18. Make-up of the Ag Committee
•Lot of new faces
•Every farm bill the committee
structure is getting more urban
•Many of the traditional, powerful
rural politicians are gone
21. The extension really wasn’t so much
an “extension” as a rewrite of the
Farm Bill with no debate
•Extended to the end of September
•Preserved Direct Payments
•Dairy pretty well got screwed
•Livestock indemnity payments gone, not funded
•Livestock forage disaster program gone, not funded
•Livestock emergency assistance gone, not funded
•Crop disaster gone.
•Beginning Farmer Program gone. (Extended but not
funded)
22. •REAP program in USDA Rural
Development gone. (Extended but not
funded)
•Conservation Security program (CSP)
gone, not funded.
•Grassland Reserve Program (GRP)
gone.
•Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP)
gone.
•McGovern-Dole International Food
Program, gone.
23. A couple of “okay” things in the
extension
•Crop Insurance still there
•With the Direct Payments still fully
funded the budget baseline is
protected for the next round of
negotiations on the farm bill
27. Effects of Farm Bill Expiration
Continuing Provisions Expiring Provisions
Crop Insurance Direct and Countercyclical Payments
Supplemental Nutrition New sign-ups for Conservation Reserve
Assistance Program (SNAP) Program (CRP) and Wetlands Reserve
Noninsured Crop Disaster Program (WRP)
Assistance (NAP) Grassland Reserve Program (GRP)
Agricultural Management Rural Energy for America Program
Assistance (AMA) Value-Added Product Development
Emergency Conservation Program Grants Program
Resource Conservation and Milk Income Loss Contract (MILC)
Development (RC&D) Program All 2008 Farm Bill Disaster Programs
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable
Program
28. Effects of Farm Bill Expiration
More Expiring Provisions
Beginning Farmer and Rancher
Development
Organic Agriculture Research and Extension
Initiatives
Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement
Projects
Farmers’ Market Promotion Program
Specialty Crop Research Initiative
…and many more
30. Why hasn’t the Farm Bill passed?
• Republican leadership of the House hasn’t allowed
the bill to be voted on
– Speaker Boehner has never supported a Farm Bill
– Ranking Member Peterson says there are enough votes
• Disagreement over depth of cuts to nutrition
– Senate SNAP cuts = $4 billion
– House Ag Committee SNAP cuts = $16 billion
– “Ryan Budget” SNAP cuts = $134 billion
31.
32. Farm Bill Spending Comparisons to
2013-2022 Baseline
Senate House
Commodity Programs -$19,428 -$23,584
Crop Insurance $5,036 $9,524
Conservation -$6,374 -$6,062
Nutrition -$4,000 -$16,075
Energy $780 $0
Rural Development $115 $105
Research $681 $546
Other $50 $482
Total -$23,140 -$35,064
33. Differences between Farm Bills
Senate Farm Bill (S. 3240) House Farm Bill (H.R. 6083)
Saves $23 billion Saves $35 billion
Includes farm-level revenue Does not include farm level
coverage option (ARC) option
Does not include much Includes reasonable levels of
protection against long-term protection against long-term
price collapse price collapse (PLC)
Tightens payment limits Doesn’t change payment limits
Funding levels & the safety net
34. Differences between Farm Bills
Senate Farm Bill (S. 3240) House Farm Bill (H.R. 6083)
Cuts $6.3 billion from Cuts $6 billion from
conservation title conservation title
Includes sodsaver provision Doesn’t include sodsaver
Ties conservation compliance No conservation compliance
to crop insurance eligibility restrictions for crop insurance
Allows funding for REAP Prohibits funding for REAP
Provides $780 million in Doesn’t provide any mandatory
mandatory funding for energy funding for energy programs
Energy & conservation
35. In both farm bills…
• Direct and countercyclical payments, ACRE, and
SURE areeliminated
• Crop insurance becomes the largest of the farm
safety net programs
• Conservation programs are restructured and
strengthened for effective delivery
• Dairy programs shift to margin insurance and
weak supply management
• The sugarprogram is extended
36. Existing House PLC
Price Protection Target Prices Target Prices
in Existing Law Wheat (bu.) $4.17 $5.50
Corn (bu.) $2.63 $3.70
and House Bill
Grain sorghum (bu.) $2.63 $3.95
Payment amount =
Barley (bu.) $2.63 $4.95
Target price X 85% of
total acres planted to Oats (bu.) $1.79 $2.40
crop (30% for Upland Cotton (lb.) $0.7125 STAX
prevented plant) Rice, med &lg (cwt.) $10.50 $14.00
X existing CCP yield or Soybeans (bu.) $6.00 $8.40
90% of 2008-2012 avg. Other oilseeds (cwt.) $12.68 $20.15
yield/planted acre Dry peas (cwt.) $8.32 $11.00
Lentils (cwt.) $12.81 $19.97
Peanuts (ton) $495 $535
37. An Alternative Safety Net
• Farmer-Owned Reserves
– includes a combination of farmer-owned
reserves, increased loan rates, set-asides, the
elimination of direct payments, and reduced reliance on
other government payment instruments.
37
43. HB 2575 Immigrant ID bill. This is a weird
one, it will allow illegal immigrants living here
for 5 years, or employed by a multi-state
company, to legally work in Kansas and to apply
for a Kansas driver’s license. I think it is
commendable that the state is finally
recognizing this very large hidden part of our
society but am disappointed that it
intentionally does not make this a step toward
citizenship. Long time opponents, corporate Ag
and social welfare groups, are allied in support
of this bill. Labor unions are opposed.
45. 9 AM – Welcome & Introductions
9:15 AM – Donn Teske, KFU President
and former farmer financial adviser
10 AM – Char Henton& Becky
O’Donnell, KS Ag Mediation Service
10:45 AM – Barb Depew, Kansas
Farm-To-School Program
11:15 AM – Rhonda Janke, K-State
Sustainable Agriculture
12 PM – Lunch by Nelson’s Landing
Restaurant
46. 1 PM – Charlie Griffin – Kansas Rural
Family Helpline
1:30 PM – Bernard Irvine –
agricultural law including farm
leases/terminations, fencing and
boundary disputes,
regulatory issues, business/succession
planning and secured transactions
2:15 PM – Chuck Otte – Geary County
agricultural extension agent
47. 3-5 PM – Producer Panel
Darrell Parks of Manhattan, sustainable pasture pork
Ed Reznicek of Goff, Kansas Organic Producers general
manager
Jason Schmidt and Herb Bartel of Hillsboro, organic
farming and grazing partnership
Warren Sutton of Norway, green bean grower
Dan Kuhn of Courtland, “Depot Market” growing and
marketing wholesale and retail produce
Dale Strickler of Jamestown, grazing specialist
Robert Nutsch of Norway, produce growing on less
than one acre
Norm Oeding of Hillsboro, organic farm manager
Chris Janssen of Scandia, high tunnel produce grower
48. Food Hubs / Food Co-ops
April 6th, 2013
Hiawatha Kansas
How Local Family Farms can feed our
communities
Americans pay just 10 cents of every disposable dollar for groceries, the lowest price of any country in the world. America’s farmers and ranchers provide the safest, most abundant, most affordable food supply in the world. It is a fantastic bargain. It is because of this safety net that they are able to continue producing. The cost for this safety net for farmers and ranchers is only 14 percent of the farm bill, or 0.28 percent of the total federal budget.
According to projections from the Congressional Budget Office for the years 2010 to 2020, farm bill programs will account for about $1.1 trillion of federal spending. (This includes nutrition and conservation programs.)Only 14 % of the total Farm Bill spending – $150.2 billion – will be spent on farm income stabilization efforts. Of this, about $49 billion will be spent on direct payments; $5.5 billion on countercyclical payments; $3.2 billion to the new Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) program; and $1.7 billion to marketing loan benefits. Crop insurance programs were slated to receive $82.8 billion, although after the recent issuance of the 2011 Standard Reinsurance Agreement, this number will be $4-$6 billion smaller.
The Congressional Budget Office projects that total federal spending over the next 10 years will be $44.3 Trillion. That includes spending on defense, social security, medicaid, foreign aid, and everything else. The Farm Bill is projected to account for 2.2% of that total, or about $970 billion. For the sake of comparison, this chart is based on the version of the bill that was passed by the Senate in June. On the bigger pie chart, you can see how that Farm Bill spending is divided. Nearly 80 percent goes to nutrition programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Only about 15 percent goes to traditional farm safety net programs, and 6 percent goes to conservation. All other farm bill programs have outlays that account for $4.5 billion in outlays over ten years.
The farm bill expired on September 30, 2012. The date is important, because it marks the end of the effective time frame of the bill passed in 2008. However, some programs continue beyond the expiration date because of the way they are written into law. These include crop insurance, the SNAP program, and several others as seen on the left. The Conservation Reserve Program, for example, will remain in effect but new contracts or sign-ups will not be allowed.However, there are several commodity programs, such as direct and countercyclical payments, ACRE, and dairy supports like MILC, that will wind down after September 30. If the previous farm bill is not extended or a new bill is not passed, commodity support programs based on a concept known as “parity” will kick in, which would mean high support prices for many crops but also high costs to the government.Also, September 30 marked the end of baseline funding for 37 programs which were part of the 2008 farm bill. This includes: Beginning Farmer and Rancher DevelopmentHealthy Forests Reserve ProgramBiobased Market ProgramBiorefinery AssistanceRepowering AssistanceBioenergy Program for Advanced BiofuelsBiodiesel Fuel Education ProgramRural Energy for America (REAP)Market Loss Assistance for Asparagus ProducersNational Sheep Industry Improvement CenterSurvey of Foods Purchased by School Food AuthoritiesAssistance for Community Food Projects: Healthy Urban Food Enterprise Development CenterRural Microentrepreneur Assistance ProgramFunding of Pending Rural Development Loan and Grant ApplicationsOrganic Agriculture Research and Extension InitiativesSURE and other disaster programsOutreach and Technical Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged FarmersValue-Added Agricultural Market Development Program GrantsOutreach and Technical Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and RanchersWetlands Reserve ProgramGrassland Reserve ProgramVoluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive ProgramSmall Watershed Rehabilitation ProgramDesert Terminal Lakes ProgramMcGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition ProgramLocal and Regional Food Aid Procurement ProjectsPilot projects to evaluate health and nutrition promotion in the supplemental nutrition assistance programStudy on Comparable Access to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance for Puerto RicoWhole Grain Products for school lunches and breakfastsBiomass Research and DevelopmentBiomass Crop Assistance ProgramFarmers’ Market Promotion ProgramNational Clean Plant NetworkNational Organic Certification Cost-SharingOrganic Production and Market Data InitiativesDetermination on Merits of Pigford ClaimsSpecialty Crop Research Initiative
The farm bill expired on September 30, 2012. The date is important, because it marks the end of the effective time frame of the bill passed in 2008. However, some programs continue beyond the expiration date because of the way they are written into law. These include crop insurance, the SNAP program, and several others as seen on the left. The Conservation Reserve Program, for example, will remain in effect but new contracts or sign-ups will not be allowed.However, there are several commodity programs, such as direct and countercyclical payments, ACRE, and dairy supports like MILC, that will wind down after September 30. If the previous farm bill is not extended or a new bill is not passed, commodity support programs based on a concept known as “parity” will kick in, which would mean high support prices for many crops but also high costs to the government.Also, September 30 marked the end of baseline funding for 37 programs which were part of the 2008 farm bill. This includes: Beginning Farmer and Rancher DevelopmentHealthy Forests Reserve ProgramBiobased Market ProgramBiorefinery AssistanceRepowering AssistanceBioenergy Program for Advanced BiofuelsBiodiesel Fuel Education ProgramRural Energy for America (REAP)Market Loss Assistance for Asparagus ProducersNational Sheep Industry Improvement CenterSurvey of Foods Purchased by School Food AuthoritiesAssistance for Community Food Projects: Healthy Urban Food Enterprise Development CenterRural Microentrepreneur Assistance ProgramFunding of Pending Rural Development Loan and Grant ApplicationsOrganic Agriculture Research and Extension InitiativesSURE and other disaster programsOutreach and Technical Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged FarmersValue-Added Agricultural Market Development Program GrantsOutreach and Technical Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and RanchersWetlands Reserve ProgramGrassland Reserve ProgramVoluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive ProgramSmall Watershed Rehabilitation ProgramDesert Terminal Lakes ProgramMcGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition ProgramLocal and Regional Food Aid Procurement ProjectsPilot projects to evaluate health and nutrition promotion in the supplemental nutrition assistance programStudy on Comparable Access to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance for Puerto RicoWhole Grain Products for school lunches and breakfastsBiomass Research and DevelopmentBiomass Crop Assistance ProgramFarmers’ Market Promotion ProgramNational Clean Plant NetworkNational Organic Certification Cost-SharingOrganic Production and Market Data InitiativesDetermination on Merits of Pigford ClaimsSpecialty Crop Research Initiative
The main reason that the farm bill hasn’t passed is because of Republican leadership in the House of Representatives. It is widely believed that there is a divide among Republicans, as many newly-elected members would very much like to cut as much as possible from all programs, especially nutrition spending, which puts them at odds with those who want to pass a bill that is responsible and can be compromised with the Senate version. It is worth noting that Speaker Boehner has never supported a Farm Bill.Ranking Member of the House Ag Committee, Collin Peterson,said in September that there were enough votes to pass the bill, but Republican leadership didn’t want to have a internal party fight on the floor of the House.Here’s an example of the disagreement of the level of cuts to nutrition:Senate SNAP cuts = $4 billionHouse Ag Committee SNAP cuts = $16 billion“Ryan Budget” SNAP cuts = $134 billion
In terms of spending, the House bill includes much higher cuts than the Senate version. The House bill cuts $35 billion while the Senate bill cuts $23 billion. Of particular note, the House bill cuts $16 billion from nutrition programs while the Senate bill only cuts $4 billion.
There are two versions of the farm bill currently in play. Looking at a comparison of the Senate passed bill and the bill passed out of the House Agriculture Committee, there are several key differences:The Senate bill cuts $23 billion while the House bill cuts $35 billionThe Senate bill Includes farm-level revenue coverage option while the House bill does notThe House bill includes reasonable levels of protection against long-term price collapse and the Senate bill does notThe Senate bill includes roughly $800 million in mandatory funding for energy programs while the House bill zeroes out fundingThe Senate bill tightens payment limits while the House will doesn’t change themNFU would like to see a blend of the Senate and House safety net title
Conservation programs are wildly popular and the demand for the programs continues to grow. They represent an opportunity to continue providing farmers and ranchers with a variety of tools to be good stewards of the environment. Current programs extended in both bills include the Environmental Quality Incentive Program, Conservation Stewardship Program, and the Conservation Reserve Program. The Senate bill includes a sodsaver provision and reattaches conservation compliance to crop insurance. The House bill includes neither.The energy title creates an opportunity for farmers and ranchers to earn an additional revenue stream, creates jobs in rural America and enhances energy security. Both the House and the Senate bills reauthorizes the Energy Title but only the Senate bill provides mandatory funding.
Despite the differences between the two versions of the legislation, there is a good deal of common ground.Direct and countercyclical payments, ACRE, and SURE are eliminated and are replaced by more defensible, need-based programs that help farmers survive difficult times.In both bills, crop insurance becomes the largest part of the farm safety net.Conservation interests reached a general consensus compromise and agreed to a streamlined set of programs. Dairy programs are based on the National Milk Producers Federation’s “Foundation for the Future” and will shift to margin insurance and weak supply management.The no-cost sugar program is extended in both bills.
This chart shows a comparison between the existing target prices for various commodities as well as the House PLC target prices. The Price Loss Coverage safety net option in the House Farm Bill increases target prices to levels that better reflect the realities of today’s market. It also protects against long-term price collapses, as other programs like RLC and ARC are based on average prices, not a fixed figure.The payment rate is also explained, as the program will make up some – but not all – of the difference between actual and target prices. The existing Upland Cotton program is replaced by a stand-alone, cotton-only program called STAX, or Stacked Income Protection Program.