Submit Search
Upload
Intellectual Property In California
•
Download as PPT, PDF
•
1 like
•
401 views
E
EEVaranini
Follow
March 2010 Presentation I gave to a Chinese Delegation
Read less
Read more
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 18
Download now
Recommended
Cutting edge technology is a driving force behind America’s sustained economic growth; domestic technology and knowledge-based markets are growing at unprecedented rates; new markets are opening to American goods under the influence of free-trade treaties; and companies that specialize in high technology are increasingly global in scope and reach. United States Government has played and continues to play very significant role in the development of these, being the biggest consumer of the cutting edge technology. In today’s marketplace, the private sector is also significant contributor. Some of the good examples are Internet and Wireless technology, which has fueled the growth digital age. The United States Constitution gives the rights to the government to protect the technology and innovations which are the key to maintaining competitive edge over other nations. One of the “Bills Of Rights” is the protection of copyrights and patents, or what we now call “Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs)”.
Intellectual property in_federal_contracts
Intellectual property in_federal_contracts
Pravin Asar
"Trademark Strategies for 2012" Presentation to the American Bar Association's Cyberspace Institute in Austin Texas on January 28, 2011. The presentation explores recent changes to the practice of trademark law, and what the future might hold for trademark owners and attorneys who advise them.
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
erikpelton
comments on trademark scams from law firm of Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC
EMP&A comments re FTC's "Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government...
EMP&A comments re FTC's "Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government...
erikpelton
June's ARTICLES
June's ARTICLES
Junghye June Yeum (염정혜)
Knobbe Martens Partner Mauricio Uribe recently wrote "The Effect of Microsoft v. Motorola" for Bloomberg BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal. Uribe discusses how Judge James L. Robart’s framework for determining a royalty rate for infringement of a standard essential patent ‘‘is now on the cusp of changing the patent litigation landscape.’’
The Effect of Microsoft v. Motorola
The Effect of Microsoft v. Motorola
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
On May 11, 2016, the President signed into law the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). The DTSA significantly expands protection of intellectual property rights by creating a body of trade secrets law that applies nationwide and by allowing businesses to enforce their trade secret rights in federal court. Previously, trade secrets were protected only by state laws (which varied from state to state), and trade secret claims ordinarily could be brought only in state court. The new federal law does not preempt the state laws; it provides an additional avenue for protection and enforcement.
The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 - New Federal Protection for Trade Secre...
The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 - New Federal Protection for Trade Secre...
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
Falls Church Chamber of Commerce - May 18, 2010
Falls Church Chamber of Commerce - May 18, 2010
erikpelton
Eff presentation on_tp_ms_and_civil_rights_sd
Eff presentation on_tp_ms_and_civil_rights_sd
Carolina Rossini
Recommended
Cutting edge technology is a driving force behind America’s sustained economic growth; domestic technology and knowledge-based markets are growing at unprecedented rates; new markets are opening to American goods under the influence of free-trade treaties; and companies that specialize in high technology are increasingly global in scope and reach. United States Government has played and continues to play very significant role in the development of these, being the biggest consumer of the cutting edge technology. In today’s marketplace, the private sector is also significant contributor. Some of the good examples are Internet and Wireless technology, which has fueled the growth digital age. The United States Constitution gives the rights to the government to protect the technology and innovations which are the key to maintaining competitive edge over other nations. One of the “Bills Of Rights” is the protection of copyrights and patents, or what we now call “Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs)”.
Intellectual property in_federal_contracts
Intellectual property in_federal_contracts
Pravin Asar
"Trademark Strategies for 2012" Presentation to the American Bar Association's Cyberspace Institute in Austin Texas on January 28, 2011. The presentation explores recent changes to the practice of trademark law, and what the future might hold for trademark owners and attorneys who advise them.
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
erikpelton
comments on trademark scams from law firm of Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC
EMP&A comments re FTC's "Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government...
EMP&A comments re FTC's "Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government...
erikpelton
June's ARTICLES
June's ARTICLES
Junghye June Yeum (염정혜)
Knobbe Martens Partner Mauricio Uribe recently wrote "The Effect of Microsoft v. Motorola" for Bloomberg BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal. Uribe discusses how Judge James L. Robart’s framework for determining a royalty rate for infringement of a standard essential patent ‘‘is now on the cusp of changing the patent litigation landscape.’’
The Effect of Microsoft v. Motorola
The Effect of Microsoft v. Motorola
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
On May 11, 2016, the President signed into law the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). The DTSA significantly expands protection of intellectual property rights by creating a body of trade secrets law that applies nationwide and by allowing businesses to enforce their trade secret rights in federal court. Previously, trade secrets were protected only by state laws (which varied from state to state), and trade secret claims ordinarily could be brought only in state court. The new federal law does not preempt the state laws; it provides an additional avenue for protection and enforcement.
The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 - New Federal Protection for Trade Secre...
The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 - New Federal Protection for Trade Secre...
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
Falls Church Chamber of Commerce - May 18, 2010
Falls Church Chamber of Commerce - May 18, 2010
erikpelton
Eff presentation on_tp_ms_and_civil_rights_sd
Eff presentation on_tp_ms_and_civil_rights_sd
Carolina Rossini
A brief insight on Cyber law & Intellectual property issues
Cyber law & Intellectual property issues
Cyber law & Intellectual property issues
atuljaybhaye
Knobbe Martens Partners Catherine Holland, Lynda Zadra-Symes, Jeff Van Hoosear and Jonathan Hyman give insight into the major trademark law issues across multiple jurisdictions, covering: ownership and scope of trademarks, application for registration, appeal of failed applications, third-party opposition to registration, duration and maintenance of marks, assignment, markings, types of trademark enforcement proceedings, procedural format and timing, discovery, litigation costs, defenses and remedies and appeals. Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in Getting the Deal Through: Trademarks 2016, (published in September 2015) For further information please visit www.gettingthedealthrough.com.
Getting the Deal Through - Trademarks
Getting the Deal Through - Trademarks
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
As the legal landscape continues to evolve in terms of intellectual property law, the Los Angeles Business Journal once again turned to some of the leading IP attorneys and experts in the region to get their assessments regarding the current state of IP legislation, the new rules of copyright protection, licensing and technology, and the various trends that they have been observing, and in some cases, driving. Below is a series of questions the Business Journal posed to these experts and the unique responses they provided – offering a glimpse into the state of intellectual property law in 2014 – from the perspectives of those in the trenches of our region today.
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
Starting May 13, significant changes in the law of design patents come into effect. First, the U.S. and Japan both join the Hague Agreement for the Registration of Industrial Designs. Second, all U.S. design patents filed May 13 or later will have a 15-year term from issuance. This is an increase from the current 14-year term. Third, starting May 13, applicants are no longer required to file a petition and pay fees to include color drawings in U.S. design applications.
Hague — A New Consideration For US Design Applications
Hague — A New Consideration For US Design Applications
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
Presentation to SCL Tech Law Futures Conference, London UK, 10 November 2016.
Internet Jurisdiction Primer
Internet Jurisdiction Primer
Graham Smith
The extraordinary two-year legal saga of Pintrips has ended in a California U.S. federal court. In a bench trial, a judge sided with Pintrips, ruling that the travel-planning site can’t be blocked from using its like-sounding name. The judge found that Pintrips invented its name by its own efforts. He was persuaded by the evidence that “pin” has been a term in generic use among the computer savvy prior to the existence of Pinterest. Two years ago Pinterest, which claims to be the country’s third-most visited social network, alleged that Pintrips chose a name similar to its own and thus infringed on its trademark. But despite the risk of significant legal costs and distraction, Pintrips defended itself until the end, represented by the law firm Kenyon & Kenyon.
Pintrips vs. Pinterest, final decision
Pintrips vs. Pinterest, final decision
tnooz
The U.S. Supreme Court recently made a significant change to the geographic location where patent infringement lawsuits may be filed. In TC Heartland v. Kraft Food Groups, decided on May 22, 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously limited the venue for patent suits against domestic corporations to either (1) the defendantʼs state of incorporation, or (2) where the defendant has a regular place of business and committed allegedly infringing acts. This decision represents a break from 30 years of precedent that allowed patent owners to sue essentially anywhere in the U.S. that the defendant sold the allegedly infringing products. By Nicholas Zovko and Brandon Smith, Knobbe Martens
Shifting Venue for Patent Infringement Lawsuits
Shifting Venue for Patent Infringement Lawsuits
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
RESEARCH - STUDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
RESEARCH - STUDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Chirine Haddad ?
International Intellectual Property, Spring 2009 A Compa
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Kathleen Broughton
Presentatie dma boston 2011: Welke impact heeft us privacyregulering op uw bu...
Presentatie dma boston 2011: Welke impact heeft us privacyregulering op uw bu...
DDMA
Tamiko Franklin's Second Life CLE on IP enforcement in virtual worlds.
Ip Enforcement In V Es
Ip Enforcement In V Es
Brian Rowe
Marcia Hofmann is a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, where she works on a broad range of digital civil liberties issues including computer security, electronic privacy, free expression, and copyright. She is also a non-residential fellow at the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society and an adjunct professor at the University of California Hastings College of the Law. She tweets about law and technology issues at @marciahofmann.
Legal Issues in Mobile Security Research
Legal Issues in Mobile Security Research
London School of Cyber Security
electronic commerce act presentation
electronic commerce act 8792 (2000)
electronic commerce act 8792 (2000)
Alison - Free Online Learning
Atty. Jesus M. Disini Jr. wrote this guide for the Philippine Exporters Confederation Inc. (PhilExport) with Janette Toral providing legislative history. Atty. Rodolfo Noel S. Quimbo also gave inputs on the Senate deliberation with respect to the Senate deliberation on Senate Bill 1523. More info on the E-Commerce Law legislative history can be found at http://www.scribd.com/doc/11306151/Philippine-Internet-Review-10-Years-of-Internet-History-19942004 Full text of the E-Commerce Law can be found at http://www.digitalfilipino.com/the-philippines-e-commerce-law-republic-act-no-8792
The Electronic Commerce Act and its Implementing Rules and Regulations
The Electronic Commerce Act and its Implementing Rules and Regulations
Janette Toral
The Federal Circuit Review is a monthly newsletter featuring the latest case summaries handed down from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In this Issue: Smartphone War Update: Some of Apple’s Patents Survive Invalidity Challenge • Sale by Foreign Supplier Invalidated Patent • District Court Abused Discretion in Refusing to Keep Confidential Documents Secret
Federal Circuit Review | September 2013
Federal Circuit Review | September 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided on is for educational purposes only. Company names mentioned herein are the property of, and may be trademarks of, their respective owners.
The Human Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
The Human Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
- Mark - Fullbright
Enforcement of Intellectaul Property Laws :Trademark Copyright Patent Design in India - Procedure and Law.
Ipr Enforcement
Ipr Enforcement
Vijay Dalmia
Resource guide by Attorney General for revenge porn cases.
Cyber exploitation-law-enforcement-bulletin
Cyber exploitation-law-enforcement-bulletin
Internet Law Center
Privacy and Privacy Law in India By Prashant Mali
Privacy and Privacy Law in India By Prashant Mali
Adv. Prashant Mali ♛ [Bsc(Phy),MSc(Comp Sci), CCFP,CISSA,LLM]
The Federal Circuit Review is a monthly newsletter featuring the latest case summaries handed down from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In this Issue: • Judgment of Infringement Entered as Sanction • Patent Exhaustion Does Not Apply to Harvested Seeds • Judges Disagree on § 101 Standards • Litigation Is Not a Domestic Industry
Federal Circuit Review | June 2013
Federal Circuit Review | June 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
Translating Related Words to Videos and Back through Latent Topics
Translating Related Words to Videos and Back through Latent Topics
Pradipto Das
A published article in the California State Bar\'s Journal - Competition - on pass-on
Exiting The Fun House Of Mirrors Clayworth V. Pfizer By Emilio Varanini
Exiting The Fun House Of Mirrors Clayworth V. Pfizer By Emilio Varanini
EEVaranini
More Related Content
What's hot
A brief insight on Cyber law & Intellectual property issues
Cyber law & Intellectual property issues
Cyber law & Intellectual property issues
atuljaybhaye
Knobbe Martens Partners Catherine Holland, Lynda Zadra-Symes, Jeff Van Hoosear and Jonathan Hyman give insight into the major trademark law issues across multiple jurisdictions, covering: ownership and scope of trademarks, application for registration, appeal of failed applications, third-party opposition to registration, duration and maintenance of marks, assignment, markings, types of trademark enforcement proceedings, procedural format and timing, discovery, litigation costs, defenses and remedies and appeals. Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in Getting the Deal Through: Trademarks 2016, (published in September 2015) For further information please visit www.gettingthedealthrough.com.
Getting the Deal Through - Trademarks
Getting the Deal Through - Trademarks
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
As the legal landscape continues to evolve in terms of intellectual property law, the Los Angeles Business Journal once again turned to some of the leading IP attorneys and experts in the region to get their assessments regarding the current state of IP legislation, the new rules of copyright protection, licensing and technology, and the various trends that they have been observing, and in some cases, driving. Below is a series of questions the Business Journal posed to these experts and the unique responses they provided – offering a glimpse into the state of intellectual property law in 2014 – from the perspectives of those in the trenches of our region today.
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
Starting May 13, significant changes in the law of design patents come into effect. First, the U.S. and Japan both join the Hague Agreement for the Registration of Industrial Designs. Second, all U.S. design patents filed May 13 or later will have a 15-year term from issuance. This is an increase from the current 14-year term. Third, starting May 13, applicants are no longer required to file a petition and pay fees to include color drawings in U.S. design applications.
Hague — A New Consideration For US Design Applications
Hague — A New Consideration For US Design Applications
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
Presentation to SCL Tech Law Futures Conference, London UK, 10 November 2016.
Internet Jurisdiction Primer
Internet Jurisdiction Primer
Graham Smith
The extraordinary two-year legal saga of Pintrips has ended in a California U.S. federal court. In a bench trial, a judge sided with Pintrips, ruling that the travel-planning site can’t be blocked from using its like-sounding name. The judge found that Pintrips invented its name by its own efforts. He was persuaded by the evidence that “pin” has been a term in generic use among the computer savvy prior to the existence of Pinterest. Two years ago Pinterest, which claims to be the country’s third-most visited social network, alleged that Pintrips chose a name similar to its own and thus infringed on its trademark. But despite the risk of significant legal costs and distraction, Pintrips defended itself until the end, represented by the law firm Kenyon & Kenyon.
Pintrips vs. Pinterest, final decision
Pintrips vs. Pinterest, final decision
tnooz
The U.S. Supreme Court recently made a significant change to the geographic location where patent infringement lawsuits may be filed. In TC Heartland v. Kraft Food Groups, decided on May 22, 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously limited the venue for patent suits against domestic corporations to either (1) the defendantʼs state of incorporation, or (2) where the defendant has a regular place of business and committed allegedly infringing acts. This decision represents a break from 30 years of precedent that allowed patent owners to sue essentially anywhere in the U.S. that the defendant sold the allegedly infringing products. By Nicholas Zovko and Brandon Smith, Knobbe Martens
Shifting Venue for Patent Infringement Lawsuits
Shifting Venue for Patent Infringement Lawsuits
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
RESEARCH - STUDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
RESEARCH - STUDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Chirine Haddad ?
International Intellectual Property, Spring 2009 A Compa
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Kathleen Broughton
Presentatie dma boston 2011: Welke impact heeft us privacyregulering op uw bu...
Presentatie dma boston 2011: Welke impact heeft us privacyregulering op uw bu...
DDMA
Tamiko Franklin's Second Life CLE on IP enforcement in virtual worlds.
Ip Enforcement In V Es
Ip Enforcement In V Es
Brian Rowe
Marcia Hofmann is a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, where she works on a broad range of digital civil liberties issues including computer security, electronic privacy, free expression, and copyright. She is also a non-residential fellow at the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society and an adjunct professor at the University of California Hastings College of the Law. She tweets about law and technology issues at @marciahofmann.
Legal Issues in Mobile Security Research
Legal Issues in Mobile Security Research
London School of Cyber Security
electronic commerce act presentation
electronic commerce act 8792 (2000)
electronic commerce act 8792 (2000)
Alison - Free Online Learning
Atty. Jesus M. Disini Jr. wrote this guide for the Philippine Exporters Confederation Inc. (PhilExport) with Janette Toral providing legislative history. Atty. Rodolfo Noel S. Quimbo also gave inputs on the Senate deliberation with respect to the Senate deliberation on Senate Bill 1523. More info on the E-Commerce Law legislative history can be found at http://www.scribd.com/doc/11306151/Philippine-Internet-Review-10-Years-of-Internet-History-19942004 Full text of the E-Commerce Law can be found at http://www.digitalfilipino.com/the-philippines-e-commerce-law-republic-act-no-8792
The Electronic Commerce Act and its Implementing Rules and Regulations
The Electronic Commerce Act and its Implementing Rules and Regulations
Janette Toral
The Federal Circuit Review is a monthly newsletter featuring the latest case summaries handed down from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In this Issue: Smartphone War Update: Some of Apple’s Patents Survive Invalidity Challenge • Sale by Foreign Supplier Invalidated Patent • District Court Abused Discretion in Refusing to Keep Confidential Documents Secret
Federal Circuit Review | September 2013
Federal Circuit Review | September 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided on is for educational purposes only. Company names mentioned herein are the property of, and may be trademarks of, their respective owners.
The Human Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
The Human Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
- Mark - Fullbright
Enforcement of Intellectaul Property Laws :Trademark Copyright Patent Design in India - Procedure and Law.
Ipr Enforcement
Ipr Enforcement
Vijay Dalmia
Resource guide by Attorney General for revenge porn cases.
Cyber exploitation-law-enforcement-bulletin
Cyber exploitation-law-enforcement-bulletin
Internet Law Center
Privacy and Privacy Law in India By Prashant Mali
Privacy and Privacy Law in India By Prashant Mali
Adv. Prashant Mali ♛ [Bsc(Phy),MSc(Comp Sci), CCFP,CISSA,LLM]
The Federal Circuit Review is a monthly newsletter featuring the latest case summaries handed down from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In this Issue: • Judgment of Infringement Entered as Sanction • Patent Exhaustion Does Not Apply to Harvested Seeds • Judges Disagree on § 101 Standards • Litigation Is Not a Domestic Industry
Federal Circuit Review | June 2013
Federal Circuit Review | June 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
What's hot
(20)
Cyber law & Intellectual property issues
Cyber law & Intellectual property issues
Getting the Deal Through - Trademarks
Getting the Deal Through - Trademarks
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Intellectual Property Law Roundtable - What Businesses Need to Know | Los Ang...
Hague — A New Consideration For US Design Applications
Hague — A New Consideration For US Design Applications
Internet Jurisdiction Primer
Internet Jurisdiction Primer
Pintrips vs. Pinterest, final decision
Pintrips vs. Pinterest, final decision
Shifting Venue for Patent Infringement Lawsuits
Shifting Venue for Patent Infringement Lawsuits
RESEARCH - STUDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
RESEARCH - STUDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Presentatie dma boston 2011: Welke impact heeft us privacyregulering op uw bu...
Presentatie dma boston 2011: Welke impact heeft us privacyregulering op uw bu...
Ip Enforcement In V Es
Ip Enforcement In V Es
Legal Issues in Mobile Security Research
Legal Issues in Mobile Security Research
electronic commerce act 8792 (2000)
electronic commerce act 8792 (2000)
The Electronic Commerce Act and its Implementing Rules and Regulations
The Electronic Commerce Act and its Implementing Rules and Regulations
Federal Circuit Review | September 2013
Federal Circuit Review | September 2013
The Human Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
The Human Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
Ipr Enforcement
Ipr Enforcement
Cyber exploitation-law-enforcement-bulletin
Cyber exploitation-law-enforcement-bulletin
Privacy and Privacy Law in India By Prashant Mali
Privacy and Privacy Law in India By Prashant Mali
Federal Circuit Review | June 2013
Federal Circuit Review | June 2013
Viewers also liked
Translating Related Words to Videos and Back through Latent Topics
Translating Related Words to Videos and Back through Latent Topics
Pradipto Das
A published article in the California State Bar\'s Journal - Competition - on pass-on
Exiting The Fun House Of Mirrors Clayworth V. Pfizer By Emilio Varanini
Exiting The Fun House Of Mirrors Clayworth V. Pfizer By Emilio Varanini
EEVaranini
CIKM11 Full Paper Presentation
Simultaneous Joint and Conditional Modeling of Documents Tagged from Two Pers...
Simultaneous Joint and Conditional Modeling of Documents Tagged from Two Pers...
Pradipto Das
This is a copy of an article comparing EU and U.S. law on information sharing in the antitrust context. It was just published in the Spring 2010 ABA Newsletter of the Trade Association Committee, entitled Information Sharing.
ABA Newsletter T Mobile Article 1
ABA Newsletter T Mobile Article 1
EEVaranini
And out again I curve and flow To join the gleaming seer, For models may come and models may go, But I go on for ever.
All good things
All good things
Pradipto Das
ESTADOS DE AGREGACION DE LA MATERIA
ESTADOS DE AGREGACION DE LA MATERIA
ESTADOS DE AGREGACION DE LA MATERIA
Karen Bonis
Evaluación de la información con fines académicos.
Evaluar la información científica
Evaluar la información científica
UCAH
Viewers also liked
(7)
Translating Related Words to Videos and Back through Latent Topics
Translating Related Words to Videos and Back through Latent Topics
Exiting The Fun House Of Mirrors Clayworth V. Pfizer By Emilio Varanini
Exiting The Fun House Of Mirrors Clayworth V. Pfizer By Emilio Varanini
Simultaneous Joint and Conditional Modeling of Documents Tagged from Two Pers...
Simultaneous Joint and Conditional Modeling of Documents Tagged from Two Pers...
ABA Newsletter T Mobile Article 1
ABA Newsletter T Mobile Article 1
All good things
All good things
ESTADOS DE AGREGACION DE LA MATERIA
ESTADOS DE AGREGACION DE LA MATERIA
Evaluar la información científica
Evaluar la información científica
Similar to Intellectual Property In California
Learning Objectives After studying this chapter, you should be able to: 1. Describe the business tort of misappropriating a trade secret. 2. Describe how an invention can be patented under federal patent laws and the penalties for patent infringement. 3. List the items that can be copyrighted and describe the penalties of copyright infringement. 4. Define trademark and service mark and describe the penalties for trademark infringement. 5. Define cyber piracy and describe the penalties for engaging in cyber infringement of intellectual property rights. Chapter Outline 1. Introduction to Intellectual Property and Cyber Piracy 2. Intellectual Property 3. Trade Secret 1. Ethics • Coca-Cola Employee Tries to Sell Trade Secrets to Pepsi-Cola 4. Patent 1. Case 7.1 • U.S. Supreme Court Case • Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. 2. Contemporary Environment • Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) 5. Copyright 1. Critical Legal Thinking Case • BMG Music v. Gonzalez 2. Case 7.2 • U.S. Supreme Court Case • Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 3. Digital Law • Digital Millennium Copyright Act 6. Trademark 1. Case 7.3 • Intel Corporation v. Intelsys Software, LLC 2. Case 7.4 • V Secret Catalogue, Inc. and Victoria’s Secret Stores, Inc. v. Moseley 3. Global Law • International Protection of Intellectual Property “The Congress shall have the power . . . to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution Introduction to Intellectual Property and Cyber Piracy The U.S. economy is based on the freedom of ownership of property. In addition to real estate and personal property, intellectual property rights have value to both businesses and individuals. This is particularly the case in the modern era of the Information Age, computers, and the Internet. Federal law provides protections for intellectual property rights, such as patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Certain federal statutes provide for either civil damages or criminal penalties, or both, to be assessed against infringers of patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Trade secrets form the basis of many successful businesses, and they are protected from misappropriation. State law imposes civil damages and criminal penalties against persons who misappropriate trade secrets. “And he that invents a machine augments the power of a man and the well-being of mankind.” Henry Ward Beecher Proverbs from Plymouth Pulpit—Business This chapter discusses trade secrets, patents, copyrights, and trademarks and how to protect them from infringement, misappropriation, and cyber piracy. Intellectual Property Intellectual property is a term that describes property that is developed through an intellectual and creative process. Intellectual property falls into a category of property known as intangible rights, which are not tang ...
Learning ObjectivesAfter studying this chapter, you should be ab.docx
Learning ObjectivesAfter studying this chapter, you should be ab.docx
smile790243
R Bays - Comparative Patent Registration
R Bays - Comparative Patent Registration
Richard Bays JD, MBA, RN, CPHQ
Patent owners often initiate concurrent proceedings against infringers in US district court and the International Trade Commission (ITC). The district court provides an avenue for an award of damages. The ITC provides an avenue for an order excluding the importation of infringing goods into the US. The Federal Circuit, in Motiva v ITC, continues to create a barrier to jurisdiction before the ITC for those patent owners, such as Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs), whose business is focused on licensing and litigation. For more information, contact info@shimokaji.com; www.shimokaji.com
Litigation Activities May Be Insufficient To Obtain An Exclusion Order: Motiv...
Litigation Activities May Be Insufficient To Obtain An Exclusion Order: Motiv...
SHIMOKAJI IP
Online trademark infringement and the liability of intermediaries
Online trademark infringement and the liability of intermediaries
Ishan Gupta
Trademark/Copyright Law Update 2008
Trademark/Copyright Law Update 2008
Jim Francis
Wiki Presentation
Intellectual properties presentation
Intellectual properties presentation
DarylSavage
Explore the nuances of various patent infringement types and their implications on intellectual property rights. Learn how patent law governs these infringements and gain valuable insights into protecting your innovations. Visit InventionIP.com for comprehensive information on patent-related matters. Visit: https://inventionip.com/
Patent Infringement Unveiled: Understanding the Different Flavors and How to ...
Patent Infringement Unveiled: Understanding the Different Flavors and How to ...
Invention ip
✍️
Technology Law Case Study
Technology Law Case Study
Jenny Richardson
This presentation discusses 5 ways corporations can minimize their risk when operating in foreign markets.
5 Ways Corporations Can Avoid International Liability
5 Ways Corporations Can Avoid International Liability
Scueto77
patents,law,basic
intellectual property in industry.ppt
intellectual property in industry.ppt
wadhava gurumeet
Mark With Care (Bob Barrett)
Mark With Care (Bob Barrett)
bob_barrett
Intellectual property generally includes patent rights, copyright rights, trademark and servicemark rights, and trade secrets. The foundation of intellectual property law is the protection of exclusive rights afforded to original works and invention. These rights can be significantly impacted by bankruptcy proceedings. This webinar examines some of these key issues including the perfection of security interests in intellectual property, the protection of certain intellectual property licenses and lack of protection for other types of intellectual property, the relief available to licensors, as well as special issues regarding assignment of licenses in bankruptcy proceedings. To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/the-intersection-of-ip-bankruptcy-2021/
The Intersection of IP & Bankruptcy (Series: Chapter 11 Potpourri)
The Intersection of IP & Bankruptcy (Series: Chapter 11 Potpourri)
Financial Poise
Online trademark infringement and the liability of intermediaries
Online trademark infringement and the liability of intermediaries
Ishan Gupta
Highlights the US Supreme Court decision in Illinois Tool Works v. Independent Ink Inc. and the rejection of the presumption of market power in patent tying cases. Comparison is made with the EU abuse of dominance in standard essential patents.
Intellectual Property Rights: Between Exclusivity and Market Power
Intellectual Property Rights: Between Exclusivity and Market Power
Moses Muchiri
ASSIGNMENT 3 (CHAPTERS 8-9) QUESTIONS Name .docx
ASSIGNMENT 3 (CHAPTERS 8-9) QUESTIONS Name .docx
ASSIGNMENT 3 (CHAPTERS 8-9) QUESTIONS Name .docx
Abhinav816839
A crucial element of formulating a firm’s technological innovation strategy is determining whether and how to protect its technological innovation.
Chapter 9 protecting innovation
Chapter 9 protecting innovation
Muhammad Anang
First Inventor to File Patent System
New Patent System
New Patent System
Melissa Woolfrey
Strauss Emarketing Chapter 5 Ethical Legal
E Marketing Ch5 Ethical Legal
E Marketing Ch5 Ethical Legal
Largest Catholic University
Cross-border licensing transactions involve a complex interplay of national and international laws and many pitfalls for the unwary.
Cross-Border Licensing Issues
Cross-Border Licensing Issues
Roger Royse
IPR
UNIT-4 PART -3 UNFAIR COM.pptx
UNIT-4 PART -3 UNFAIR COM.pptx
GovadaDhana
Similar to Intellectual Property In California
(20)
Learning ObjectivesAfter studying this chapter, you should be ab.docx
Learning ObjectivesAfter studying this chapter, you should be ab.docx
R Bays - Comparative Patent Registration
R Bays - Comparative Patent Registration
Litigation Activities May Be Insufficient To Obtain An Exclusion Order: Motiv...
Litigation Activities May Be Insufficient To Obtain An Exclusion Order: Motiv...
Online trademark infringement and the liability of intermediaries
Online trademark infringement and the liability of intermediaries
Trademark/Copyright Law Update 2008
Trademark/Copyright Law Update 2008
Intellectual properties presentation
Intellectual properties presentation
Patent Infringement Unveiled: Understanding the Different Flavors and How to ...
Patent Infringement Unveiled: Understanding the Different Flavors and How to ...
Technology Law Case Study
Technology Law Case Study
5 Ways Corporations Can Avoid International Liability
5 Ways Corporations Can Avoid International Liability
intellectual property in industry.ppt
intellectual property in industry.ppt
Mark With Care (Bob Barrett)
Mark With Care (Bob Barrett)
The Intersection of IP & Bankruptcy (Series: Chapter 11 Potpourri)
The Intersection of IP & Bankruptcy (Series: Chapter 11 Potpourri)
Online trademark infringement and the liability of intermediaries
Online trademark infringement and the liability of intermediaries
Intellectual Property Rights: Between Exclusivity and Market Power
Intellectual Property Rights: Between Exclusivity and Market Power
ASSIGNMENT 3 (CHAPTERS 8-9) QUESTIONS Name .docx
ASSIGNMENT 3 (CHAPTERS 8-9) QUESTIONS Name .docx
Chapter 9 protecting innovation
Chapter 9 protecting innovation
New Patent System
New Patent System
E Marketing Ch5 Ethical Legal
E Marketing Ch5 Ethical Legal
Cross-Border Licensing Issues
Cross-Border Licensing Issues
UNIT-4 PART -3 UNFAIR COM.pptx
UNIT-4 PART -3 UNFAIR COM.pptx
Intellectual Property In California
1.
Intellectual Property in
California Emilio Varanini Deputy Attorney General California Office of the Attorney General Antitrust Section
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Download now