SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 39
Malaysia Report
2016 Edelman
Trust Barometer
Informed Public
‣ 8 years in 20+ markets
‣ Represents 15% of total global population
‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries
Must meet 4 criteria:
‣ Ages 25-64
‣ College educated
‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each country
‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news
General Online Population
‣ 5 years in 25+ markets
‣ Ages 18+
‣ 1,150 respondents per country
Methodology
28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000). Country-
specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500),
Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100).
‣ 16 years of data
‣ 33,000+ respondents total
‣ All fieldwork was conducted between
October 13th and November 16th, 2015
Online Survey in 28 Countries
Mass Population
‣ All population not including Informed Public
‣ Represents 85% of total global population
2
Trust in Retrospect
3
Rising Influence
of NGOs
2001
Business Must
Partner with
Government to
Regain Trust
2009
Fall of the
Celebrity CEO
2002
Earned Media
More Credible
Than Advertising
2003
U.S. Companies
in Europe Suffer
Trust Discount
2004
Trust Shifts from
“Authorities” to
Peers
2005
“A Person Like
Me” Emerges as
Credible
Spokesperson
2006
Business More
Trusted Than
Government
and Media
2007
Young Influencers
Have More Trust
in Business
2008
Trust is Now an
Essential Line
of Business
2010
Rise of
Authority
Figures
2011
Fall of
Government
2012
Crisis of
Leadership
2013
Business to
Lead the Debate
for Change
2014
Trust is
Essential to
Innovation
2015
Growing
Inequality
of Trust
2016
76
67
61
50
41
27
51
38
36
37
23
21
Trust Matters
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies
that you trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. Q377-380. Still thinking about the past 12
months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you do not trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population,
Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
4
Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust
Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies
Refused to buy products/services
Criticized companies
Shared negative opinions
Disagreed with others
Paid more than wanted
Sold shares
Chose to buy products/services
Recommended them to a friend/colleague
Shared positive opinions online
Defended company
Paid more
Bought shares
most trusted
content creators:#1
Friends and
Family
most trusted
media source:#1
Online Search
Engines
General
Population
1 The state
of Trust
49 Ireland
47 Turkey
46 Sweden
42 Poland
42 Russia
41 Japan
49 Australia
49 Italy
49 U.S.
47 Hong Kong
46 Spain
45 S. Africa
42 Germany
42 S. Korea
42 U.K.
41 France
41 Ireland
41 Turkey
39 Russia
38 Japan
37 Sweden
35 Poland
73 China
66 UAE
65 India
64 Singapore
62 Indonesia
60 Mexico
82 China
78 India
74 UAE
72 Mexico
72 Singapore
70 Indonesia
64 U.S.
63 Australia
63 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Colombia
56 Canada
55 Colombia
52 Netherlands
51 Argentina
51 Malaysia
50 Brazil58 Brazil
58 Italy
58 Malaysia
57 U.K.
55 France
54 S. Africa
53 Argentina
53 Spain
52 Hong Kong
51 Germany
50 S. Korea
Trust Index:
General Population
Lags
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public vs.
General Population, 2016
Nearly 6 in 10
countries are
distrusters among the
General Population
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
28-country global total.
Informed
Public
General
Population
60 Global 50 Global
6
Trusters
Neutrals
Distrusters
55 Global 60 Global
82 China
78 India
74 UAE
72 Mexico
72 Singapore
70 Indonesia
64 U.S.
63 Australia
63 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Colombia
84 UAE
79 India
78 Indonesia
75 China
65 Singapore
64 Netherlands
49 Ireland
47 Turkey
46 Sweden
42 Poland
42 Russia
41 Japan
48 Italy
48 S. Africa
47 Hong Kong
47 S. Korea
46 U.K.
45 Argentina
45 Poland
45 Russia
45 Spain
45 Sweden
40 Turkey
37 Ireland
37 Japan
58 Brazil
58 Italy
58 Malaysia
57 U.K.
55 France
54 S. Africa
53 Argentina
53 Spain
52 Hong Kong
51 Germany
50 S. Korea
59 Brazil
59 Mexico
56 Malaysia
53 Canada
52 Australia
52 France
52 U.S.
50 Germany
Trust Index:
Informed Public
Drives Rebound
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public, 2015 vs. 2016
2015 2016
Informed Public
trust up 5 points
Trusters from 22% in
2015 to 39% in 2016
Distrusters from 48%
in 2015 to 21% in 2016
Trusters
Neutrals
Distrusters
7
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
27-country global total.
49 Australia
49 Italy
49 U.S.
47 Hong Kong
46 Spain
45 S. Africa
42 Germany
42 S. Korea
42 U.K.
41 France
41 Ireland
41 Turkey
39 Russia
38 Japan
37 Sweden
35 Poland
73 China
66 UAE
65 India
64 Singapore
62 Indonesia
60 Mexico
57 Mexico
55 Canada
55 Colombia
52 Netherlands
50 Argentina
50 Malaysia
48 Brazil
47 Australia
47 Italy
46 Hong Kong
45 U.S.
44 S. Africa
44 Spain
42 Germany
40 S. Korea
40 U.K.
39 France
39 Ireland
39 Russia
39 Turkey
38 Japan
36 Sweden
34 Poland
71 China
65 UAE
62 India
62 Indonesia
62 Singapore
56 Canada
55 Colombia
52 Netherlands
51 Argentina
51 Malaysia
50 Brazil
Trust Index:
Mass Population
Left Behind
Average trust in institutions,
Informed Public vs. General
Population vs. Mass Population
For the mass
population,
17 of 28 countries
are distrusters
The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the
institutions of government, business, media and NGOs.
28-country global total.
General
Population
Mass
Population
50 Global 48 Global
49 Ireland
47 Turkey
46 Sweden
42 Poland
42 Russia
41 Japan
82 China
78 India
74 UAE
72 Mexico
72 Singapore
70 Indonesia
64 U.S.
63 Australia
63 Canada
62 Netherlands
61 Colombia
58 Brazil
58 Italy
58 Malaysia
57 U.K.
55 France
54 S. Africa
53 Argentina
53 Spain
52 Hong Kong
51 Germany
50 S. Korea
Informed
Public
60 Global For the mass
population, the
global index falls into
distruster territory
8
Trusters
Neutrals
Distrusters
59 60
46 46
61 58
45
39
67 67
46 45
71 67
59
34
Trust in Malaysia
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public
and General Population, Malaysia
9
Percent trust in the four institutions of
government, business, media and NGOs, 2015 vs. 2016
Informed
Public
General
Population
NGOs Business Media Government
+4 0 +13 -11
2015 2016
+2 -2 -1 -7
68
76 75
67
71
58
65 65
59
61
49
60
54
45
34
52
59
51
46
39
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
65 63
72
67 67
58
64
62 60 58
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public
and General Population, Malaysia
10
Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 vs. 2016
47
60
59
46
59
46
58
51
46 45
NGO’s
Government
Media
Business
A five year view of Malaysia
Informed
Public
General
Population
50%
41
75
68
47
51
37
44
41
35 36
34
30
28
22
27
23
15 16
83
68
65
51
48
40
46
27
32
23
42
79
74
53 53
45 45
42
39 39
36 35
32 32
30
26 26
16
32
80
65
58
49
45
39 39
24
21
19
Global27
China
Singapore
Canada
Russia
Australia
HongKong
Turkey
US
Japan
UK
SouthKorea
Mexico
Ireland
Italy
Argentina
Spain
SouthAfrica
Colombia
UAE
India
Indonesia
Netherlands
Sweden
Germany
Malaysia
France
Brazil
Poland
Government Increases Slightly Worldwide
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust
that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“
(Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total.
11
Percent trust in government, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016
General
Population
Increased/equal trust in 17 countries
+10 +11 -11
2015 2016
50%
55
46
19 21
28
48
41
45
42
47
44
57
46
50
46
63
52
49
58 55 55
51
69
62 64
73 73
79 81
87
47
37
15
20
24
31 31 33 33 34 34
36 36 37
39
45 46 47 49 49 49
57
64 64 65
69 70
74
81 83
Global
GDP5
Japan
France
Germany
U.K.
Australia
Italy
S.Korea
Netherlands
Sweden
Poland
HongKong
Canada
Russia
U.S.
Singapore
Turkey
Ireland
S.Africa
Spain
Malaysia
Mexico
Argentina
Brazil
China
UAE
Indonesia
Colombia
India
In 19 of 28 countries, less than half of Mass Population
think they will be better off in five years
Malaysia More Optimistic than the majority of countries
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q445. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing
in five years' time? (Top 2 Box, ‘Much better off than today,’ and ‘Somewhat better off than today.’) Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 12
Percent of the Informed Public vs. Mass Population who
believe they and their families will be better off in five years’ time Informed
Public
Mass
Population
17 10 12 13 10 21 10 13 18
2 Peer to peer in a
changing media
landscape
50%
45
64
55
48
52
54
51
45
41 42
39
41 41
34
31 30
33
28
18
70
68
62
50
46 45
39
42
38
47
73
60
58
55 55 54 53
50 49
47
45
43 42
39 38
36
31
23
55
63 63
59
47
45 44
38 38
34
Global
China
Singapore
Mexico
Canada
Netherlands
Brazil
Argentina
Italy
Spain
US
SouthAfrica
SouthKorea
Australia
Ireland
Japan
UK
Sweden
Turkey
Colombia
India
Indonesia
UAE
HongKong
Malaysia
Germany
France
Russia
Poland
Media Increases
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [MEDIA IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that
institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4
Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total.
14
Percent trust in media, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016
General
Population
+10
Increased trust in 18 countries
2015 2016
Power of Peer-Driven Media
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - How often do you read, view, click on or engage with the following types of content, media or information sources? Online
search engines, such as Google… (Q285), Television news and information (Q287), Social networking sites, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter,
etc.(Net of Q278 Social Networking, Q279 Blogs, Q289 Online message boards, forums or newsgroups), articles in printed newspapers (Q284), articles in printed
magazines(Q283), Blogs (Q279) (Several times a week+) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
15
Percent who use each media source several times a week or more
General
Population
81
77
68
56
41
41
Social
Search
TV
Newspapers
Magazines
Blogs
2 of top 3 most-used
sources of news and
information are peer-
influenced media
Millennials Peer-Driven Media
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q278-597 How often do you read, view, click on or engage with the following types of content, media or information
sources? Online search engines, such as Google… (Q285), Television news and information (Q287), Social networking sites, such as Facebook, LinkedIn,
Instagram, Twitter, etc.(Net of Q278 Social Networking, Q279 Blogs, Q289 Online message boards, forums or newsgroups), articles in printed newspapers (Q284),
articles in printed magazines(Q283), Blogs (Q279) (Several times a week+) General Population Millennials (aged 21-34), Malaysia, question asked of half the
sample.
16
Percent who use each media source several times a week or more, 2015 vs 2016
General
Population
85
82
66
60
42
39
83
81
62
49
46
37
Social
Search
TV
Newspapers
Blogs
Magazines
2015 2016
2 of top 3 most-used
sources of news and
information are peer-
influenced media
57
61
59
57
4949
56
54
49
52
51
59
56
49
42
64
70 69
66 66
52
58
56
52
47
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Trust across the Media Landscape
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general
news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box,
Trust) General Population and Millennials, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
Trust in each source for general news and information
*From 2012-2015, we included Online Search Engines as a media type. In 2016, we changed to Search Engines.
**From 2012-2015, we included Hybrid as a media type. In 2016, we changed this over to Online-Only.
Millennials
even more trusting
of digital media than
general population
Industry Millenials Gap
Search Engines* 69% 3
Online-only Media** 58% 6
Traditional Media 52% 3
Owned media 52% 5
Social media 44% 2
General
Population
67 66
59
52
47 49
52 52
27
35
74 73
68
57
53
49
45
40
32 30
My friends
and family
An academic
expert
Companies
that I use
A company
CEO
Elected
officials
Employees of
a company
A well-known
online
personality
A journalist Companies
[brands] I
don’t use
Celebrities
Every Voice Matters
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q598-609. Thinking about the information you consume, how much do you trust the information from each of the following
authors or content creators? (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
18
Percent who trust information created by each author on social networking
sites, content sharing sites and online-only information sources, 2015 vs. 2016 2015 2016
General
Population
+9
50%
70 69
62
51
55
53
50
41 40
69
67
58 57 56
51
43
37
35
Peers More Credible than Leaders
Source: 2016 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-587. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
19
Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible
2015 2016
+6
Technical
Expert
Academic
Expert
A person
like
yourself
Financial
Industry
Analyst
EmployeeCEO NGO
representative
Board of
Directors
Government
official/regul
ator
Person like yourself
credibility
increased the most
General
Population
20
“This year’s data reinforces the trusted role that search and social technology platforms play in taking
a fragmented landscape of published content and re-aggregating it in a fashion that often directly
reflects an individual’s worldview. The data reinforces the need to build integrated communications
programs that map the total journey stakeholders take to consume information.”
Steve Rubel
Chief Content Strategist
Influence
The Inversion of
Influence
21
Influence
& Authority
Authority
Old Model
‣ Elites have access
to more/better
information
‣ Elites’ interests
interconnected with
those of mass
‣ Becoming an “elite”
open to all
New Reality
‣ Peer-to-peer influence
more powerful than top-
down
‣ Increasing distrust
among mass population
‣ Mass movements based
on dissatisfaction and
urgency
The Divide
‣ Democratization of
information and more
information
‣ High-profile revelations
of greed and
misbehavior
‣ Income inequality
The Inversion of Influence
22Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public
and Mass Population, Malaysia.
Mass
Population
Authority
& Influence
Influence
Authority
85%
of
population
50 Trust Index
15%
of
population
58 Trust Index
Informed
Public
3 Business can
Provide Leadership
in a Divided World
50%
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [BUSINESS IN GENERAL] [GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please
indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you
“trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
48 47
64
70
58
68
65
59 56 57
48
51
43
46
51
36
44
30
46
36
40
32
42
38 36 37
30
60
57
53
50
76
71 70 69 67
64
60 60
57 56
53
52 51
48 46 46 46
43 43 42 42
39 38 38
33
58 56
Global27
GDP5
Mexico
Indonesia
China
India
UAE
Brazil
S.Africa
Singapore
Italy
Canada
Argentina
Australia
U.S.
Spain
UK
France
Sweden
Ireland
Japan
Turkey
Germany
HongKong
Poland
Russia
S.Korea
Malaysia
Netherlands
Global Increase in Business Trust
24
Percent trust in business, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016
Increased or equal trust in business in 26 countries
+12 +12 +10 +12 +16 +10
General
Population
2015 2016
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
Sector Trends:
Financial Services Rebounds
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429. Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Malaysia
*From 2012-2014, Pharma included as subsector(Q61f-65f).
**From 2012-2015, Pharma included as an industry sector (Q43-60). 2012-2014 data recalibrated as a sector.
Trust in each industry sector, 2012 - 2016
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
5 yr.
Trend
Technology 80% 85% 81% 83% 81% 1
Pharmaceutical 66% 73% 67% 70% 81% 15
Automotive 70% 79% 76% 79% 74% 4
Telecommunications 73% 81% 72% 75% 71% 2
Food & Beverage 69% 76% 69% 69% 68% 1
Energy 65% 75% 69% 69% 68% 3
Financial Services 67% 72% 69% 67% 67% 0
Consumer Packaged Goods 59% 69% 64% 69% 64% 5
General
Population
25
78
70 68
64 66
58
62
58
63
55 55
45
42
33 33 31
80
72 71 70 69
65 64 63 61 61
57 57
47
39 38 37
28
Japan
UK
Australia
Germany
Switzerland
SouthKorea
Sweden
Canada
France
US
Italy
Netherlands
Spain
China
India
Brazil
Mexico
2015 2016
50%
Trust in National Identity of Companies Mainly Unchanged
Q26-422. [TRACKING] Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the
following countries to do what is right. Use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. [RANDOMIZE.
SELECT ONE RESPONSE]
Trust in companies based on country of origin, 2015 - 2016 General
Population
Significant Increase
71
67
59
34
66
77
64
39
61
58
45
39
63
68
54
41
NGOs Business Media Government
Business Most Trusted to Keep Pace
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right
using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Q441-444 Below
is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to keep up with the changing times using a 9-point scale where one means
that you “do not trust them at all to keep up with change” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal to keep up with change”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed
Public and General Population, Malaysia.
27
Percent trust, and percent who trust each institution to keep up
with the changing times, 2016
Informed
Public
General
Population
Trust Trusted to
keep pace
Business in the lead
Business Must Lead to Solve Problems
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population,
Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
.
85% agree
“A company can take
specific actions that both
increase profits and improve
the economic and social
conditions in the community
where it operates.”
up from 78% in 2015
General
Population
28
Purpose Impacts Trust
Percent who cite each as a reason for why their trust in business has increased or decreased
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q328-329. For which of the following reasons, if any, has your trust in each institution listed below increased over the past year? Q330-331. For which
of the following reasons, if any, has your trust in each institution listed below decreased over the past year? General Population, Malaysia
Reasons Trust in
Business Has Increased
Reasons Trust in
Business Has Decreased
Produces
economic growth
Contributes to the
greater good
Productive member of
society
Lacks economic growth
Provides few public
services
Fails to contribute
to the greater good
62%
55%
45%
46%
42%
41%
General
Population
29
Access to education/training
Address income inequality
Access to healthcare
Protecting/improving the environment
Reducing poverty
Supporting human & civil rights
Modern infrastructure
E
E
P
H
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q561-573 Thinking about businesses in your country, how important is it that they play a role in solving each of the following societal issues?
Please use a nine-point scale where one means that it is “not at all important” and nine means that it is “extremely important”. (Top 4 Box, Importance) General Population, 28-country
global total, question asked of one quarter the sample.
Societal
Expectations
Vary
30
Most important issue for
business to address in
each country
Canada
Brazil
Germany
France
China
U.S.
Poland
Argentina
Sweden
Mexico
U.K.
Ireland
Netherlands
Turkey
Singapore
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Colombia
Japan
Australia
Russia
S. Korea
Italy
Spain
Indonesia
UAE
S. Africa
India
General
Population
R
I
I
E
E
R
H
E
E
E
E
E
P
P
E
H
P
E
H
H
H
E
E
E
E
E
P
I
H
E
I
Purpose and Profits Matter
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q496-506. How visible do you think a CEO should personally be in these different types of business situations? Please
use a 9-point scale where one means that it is “not visible at all” and nine means that it is “extremely visible”. (Top 4 Box, Visible) General Population, Malaysia,
question asked of half the sample.
31
Percent who agree that CEOs should be personally visible in discussing…
80%
Societal
Issues
‣ Income inequality
‣ Public policy discussions
‣ Personal views on
societal issues
72%
Financial
Results
General
Population
Company NOT
engaged in
societal issues
Company
engaged in
societal issues
Employee Advocacy Increases
With Societal Issue Engagement
32
Percent who agree with each statement, comparing those who work at
companies/for CEOs involved in addressing broader societal issues vs.
those who do not
58
66
73
68
78
73
85
Recommend company as an employer
Stay working for the company
Recommend products and services to
others
Confidence in the future of the company
Committed to achieving our strategy
Motivated to perform
Do the best possible job for the customer
Impact of
Company
Engagement
4
16
9
19
12
18
25
89
89
87
87
85
84
83
General
Population
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q527-529. Does your company and your company’s CEO get involved in addressing broader societal issues beyond the
core business, through programs or relationships with other companies? Q530-536. Thinking about your current company, please indicate how much you agree
with each of the following statements using a 9-point scale where one means that you “strongly disagree” and nine means that you “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box,
Agree) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
65
60
40
48 48 50
54 55 56
57 58 59 60 62 62 63 64 64 64
72 73 76 76 77 77 78 79
83 85
89
Global
GDP5
Japan
Russia
France
Sweden
Australia
S.Korea
Poland
U.K.
Italy
HongKong
Ireland
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Turkey
Canada
U.S.
S.Africa
Singapore
Malaysia
UAE
Indonesia
Brazil
Argentina
China
India
Colombia
Mexico
50%
Malaysian Employees More Trusting
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q525-526. Thinking about your own company and other companies in your industry, please indicate how much you trust
each to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box,
Trust) General Population, 28-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
33
Percent who trust the company for which they work
TrustedNot Trusted
General
Population
Integrity 38% 56% 18
Has Ethical Business Practices 39% 57% 18
Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 36% 53% 17
Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 40% 57% 17
Engagement 38% 55% 17
Treats Employees Well 38% 56% 18
Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 38% 57% 19
Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 37% 54% 17
Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 39% 54% 15
Products 38% 50% 12
Offers High Quality Products Or Services 41% 59% 18
Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 35% 41% 6
Purpose 33% 46% 13
Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 34% 50% 16
Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 34% 47% 13
Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 33% 47% 14
Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 29% 39% 10
Operations 34% 43% 9
Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 33% 44% 11
Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 31% 39% 8
Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 37% 46% 9
Trust Building
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust
Barometer Q80-95 How important is
each of the following attributes to
building your TRUST in a company?
Use a 9-point scale where one means
that attribute is “not at all important to
building your trust” and nine means it
is “extremely important to building
your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box,
Importance) Q114-129 Please rate
businesses in general on how well
you think they are performing on each
of the following attributes. Use a 9-
point scale where one means they are
"performing extremely poorly" and
nine means they are "performing
extremely well". (Top 2 Box,
Performance) General Population,
Malaysia.
Company Importance vs. Performance
ImportancePerformance Gap
General
Population
34
31
36
20
35
32
42
34
37 37
34
49
40
32
29
49
27 28
32
21
28 29
25 26
18
23
20
18
25
19 19
3
6 6
14
10 9
Employees Are Essential Advocates
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Q610 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company's financial earnings and operational performance, and top leadership’s accomplishments? Q611 A company’s
business practices and handling of a crisis: Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s business practices, both positive and negative, and its handling of a crisis? Q612 Who do you trust MOST
to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s employee programs, benefits and working conditions, and how a company serves its customers and prioritizes customer needs ahead of company profits? Q613 Who do you
trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s partnerships with NGOs and effort to address societal issues, including those to positively impact the local community? Q614 Who do you trust MOST to provide
you with credible and honest information about a company’s innovation efforts and new product development? Q615 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s stand on issues related to the
industry in which it operates? General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
35
Most trusted spokesperson to communicate each topic
Innovation effortsFinancial earnings &
operational
performance
Business practices/
crisis handling
Treatment of
employees/customer
Partnerships/
Programs to address
societal issues
Views on
industry issues
Employees Most Trusted
General
Population
Company CEO
Senior executive
Employee
Activist consumer
Academic
Media spokesperson
3 Providing a focus
for CEOs
CEO Focus Misplaced
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q451-461. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree/Bot 5 Box, Disagree)
General Population, Malaysia [‘CEOs do too much lobbying,’ ‘CEOs can be trust to create jobs,’ ‘Given that the average tenure of CEOs is just 4 years, CEOs aren’t in their role long enough to
make a positive impact,’ ‘CEOs are too focused on short-term financial results,’]
37
Percent who agree with each statement about CEOs
Too Much
Focus on short-term
financial results59%
Lobbying57%
Not Enough
Job creation38%
Positive
long-term impact61%
General
Population
67%
73%
81%83%
Their education and
how it shaped them
Their personal
success story
The obstacles
they have overcome
Their personal values
Personal Values and History Matter
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q507-514. Thinking about how a CEO communicates with a variety of groups and individuals, how important are each of the following activities a CEO could engage in? Please
use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust”. (Top 4 Box, Important) General Population, 28-country
global total, question asked of half the sample. [Media Engagement net = Q507 ‘Interviews with the media,’ and ‘Q512 ‘Sharing their views on a blog or on social media.’ Direct Engagement net = Q508 ‘Communications
with employees,’ and ‘Participation in industry conferences.’] Q516-524. For you to trust a CEO, how important is it that you have information on each of the following aspects of the CEO’s personal life outside of their
business? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust. (Top 4 Box, Important) General
Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
Percent who agree that each type of information
is important in building trust in a CEO
General
Population
38
76
67
61
50
41
27
51
38
36
37
23
21
Trust Matters
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies
that you trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. Q377-380. Still thinking about the past 12
months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you do not trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population,
Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 39
Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust
Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies
Refused to buy products/services
Criticized companies
Shared negative opinions
Disagreed with others
Paid more than wanted
Sold shares
Chose to buy products/services
Recommended them to a friend/colleague
Shared positive opinions online
Defended company
Paid more
Bought shares
most trusted
content creators:#1
Friends and
Family
most trusted
media source:#1
Online Search
Engines
General
Population

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global ResultsEdelman
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007edelman.milan
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Italy
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - ItalyEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Italy
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - ItalyEdelman Italia
 
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016Edelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian ResultsEdelman
 
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust Index
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust IndexThe Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust Index
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust IndexProof
 
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry Edelman
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust BarometerDaniel Roth
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman_UK
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - EnglishEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisEdelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisBrandwatch
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndonesiaEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European ResultsEdelman Amsterdam
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman Japan
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Edelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer India
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
Edelman Trust Barometer 2007
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Italy
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - ItalyEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Italy
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Italy
 
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016
Trust in Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa 2016
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Canadian Results
 
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust Index
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust IndexThe Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust Index
The Environics Communications 2016 CanTrust Index
 
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Energy Industry
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Australia
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - UK Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - English
 
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in CrisisEdelman: Trust in Crisis
Edelman: Trust in Crisis
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Indonesia
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 

Destacado

2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global ResultsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Edelman APACMEA
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan Edelman APACMEA
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global ResultsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential ElectionEdelman
 
2015 Earned Brand Australia
2015 Earned Brand Australia2015 Earned Brand Australia
2015 Earned Brand AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - ChinaEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
Organisational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinner
Organisational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinnerOrganisational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinner
Organisational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinnerTorben Rick
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK ResultsEdelman_UK
 

Destacado (18)

2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (English)
 
2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan 2016 Earned Brand Japan
2016 Earned Brand Japan
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the U.S. Presidential Election
 
2015 Earned Brand Australia
2015 Earned Brand Australia2015 Earned Brand Australia
2015 Earned Brand Australia
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Korea
 
2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia2016 Earned Brand Australia
2016 Earned Brand Australia
 
Organisational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinner
Organisational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinnerOrganisational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinner
Organisational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch and dinner
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK Results
 
Digital in 2017: Southeast Asia
Digital in 2017: Southeast AsiaDigital in 2017: Southeast Asia
Digital in 2017: Southeast Asia
 
Digital in 2016
Digital in 2016Digital in 2016
Digital in 2016
 
SlideShare 101
SlideShare 101SlideShare 101
SlideShare 101
 

Similar a 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia

Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Soymimarca
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf instituteChristina Fuhr, Ph.D.
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South AfricaEdelman APACMEA
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Italia
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage ResultsEdelman
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector ResultsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy ResultsEdelman
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services ResultsEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South AfricaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa ReportEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services ResultsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer Edelman
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEOEdelman
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy ResultsEdelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Argentina
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - ArgentinaEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Argentina
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - ArgentinaPaula Herreros
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial ServicesEdelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial ServicesEdelman.ergo GmbH
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2019 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer - JapanEdelman Japan
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong ResultsEdelman
 

Similar a 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia (20)

Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launchEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Italian launch
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Food & Beverage Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer 2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
2017 Edelman Ireland Trust Barometer
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
 
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
Barómatro de Confianza 2017 por Edelman- Trust barometer global report final
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Argentina
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - ArgentinaEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Argentina
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Argentina
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial ServicesEdelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
 
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan2019 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
2019 Edelman Trust Barometer - Japan
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Hong Kong Results
 

Más de Edelman APACMEA

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - ChinaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - MalaysiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South KoreaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAEEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - IndiaEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong KongEdelman APACMEA
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - SingaporeEdelman APACMEA
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - AustraliaEdelman APACMEA
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Edelman APACMEA
 
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016   Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016 Edelman APACMEA
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - ChineseEdelman APACMEA
 

Más de Edelman APACMEA (13)

2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - China
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Korea
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - India
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Hong Kong
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Singapore
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia
 
2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India2016 Earned Brand India
2016 Earned Brand India
 
2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China2016 Earned Brand China
2016 Earned Brand China
 
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
Trust in China and Europe 2016 (Chinese)
 
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016   Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
Edelman China Public Affairs Update - March 2016
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer China - Chinese
 

Último

How videos can elevate your Google rankings and improve your EEAT - Benjamin ...
How videos can elevate your Google rankings and improve your EEAT - Benjamin ...How videos can elevate your Google rankings and improve your EEAT - Benjamin ...
How videos can elevate your Google rankings and improve your EEAT - Benjamin ...Benjamin Szturmaj
 
pptx.marketing strategy of tanishq. pptx
pptx.marketing strategy of tanishq. pptxpptx.marketing strategy of tanishq. pptx
pptx.marketing strategy of tanishq. pptxarsathsahil
 
Forecast of Content Marketing through AI
Forecast of Content Marketing through AIForecast of Content Marketing through AI
Forecast of Content Marketing through AIRinky
 
Local SEO Domination: Put your business at the forefront of local searches!
Local SEO Domination:  Put your business at the forefront of local searches!Local SEO Domination:  Put your business at the forefront of local searches!
Local SEO Domination: Put your business at the forefront of local searches!dstvtechnician
 
Moving beyond multi-touch attribution - DigiMarCon CanWest 2024
Moving beyond multi-touch attribution - DigiMarCon CanWest 2024Moving beyond multi-touch attribution - DigiMarCon CanWest 2024
Moving beyond multi-touch attribution - DigiMarCon CanWest 2024Richard Ingilby
 
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdfTOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdfasiyahanif9977
 
Social Samosa Guidebook for SAMMIES 2024.pdf
Social Samosa Guidebook for SAMMIES 2024.pdfSocial Samosa Guidebook for SAMMIES 2024.pdf
Social Samosa Guidebook for SAMMIES 2024.pdfSocial Samosa
 
Cost-effective tactics for navigating CPC surges
Cost-effective tactics for navigating CPC surgesCost-effective tactics for navigating CPC surges
Cost-effective tactics for navigating CPC surgesPushON Ltd
 
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly BulletinBLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly BulletinBalmerLawrie
 
Mastering SEO in the Evolving AI-driven World
Mastering SEO in the Evolving AI-driven WorldMastering SEO in the Evolving AI-driven World
Mastering SEO in the Evolving AI-driven WorldScalenut
 
Netflix Ads The Game Changer in Video Ads – Who Needs YouTube.pptx (Chester Y...
Netflix Ads The Game Changer in Video Ads – Who Needs YouTube.pptx (Chester Y...Netflix Ads The Game Changer in Video Ads – Who Needs YouTube.pptx (Chester Y...
Netflix Ads The Game Changer in Video Ads – Who Needs YouTube.pptx (Chester Y...ChesterYang6
 
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdfBrand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdftbatkhuu1
 
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentationKraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentationtbatkhuu1
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 150 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 150 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 150 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 150 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 
Unraveling the Mystery of Roanoke Colony: What Really Happened?
Unraveling the Mystery of Roanoke Colony: What Really Happened?Unraveling the Mystery of Roanoke Colony: What Really Happened?
Unraveling the Mystery of Roanoke Colony: What Really Happened?elizabethella096
 

Último (20)

How videos can elevate your Google rankings and improve your EEAT - Benjamin ...
How videos can elevate your Google rankings and improve your EEAT - Benjamin ...How videos can elevate your Google rankings and improve your EEAT - Benjamin ...
How videos can elevate your Google rankings and improve your EEAT - Benjamin ...
 
pptx.marketing strategy of tanishq. pptx
pptx.marketing strategy of tanishq. pptxpptx.marketing strategy of tanishq. pptx
pptx.marketing strategy of tanishq. pptx
 
SEO Master Class - Steve Wiideman, Wiideman Consulting Group
SEO Master Class - Steve Wiideman, Wiideman Consulting GroupSEO Master Class - Steve Wiideman, Wiideman Consulting Group
SEO Master Class - Steve Wiideman, Wiideman Consulting Group
 
BUY GMAIL ACCOUNTS PVA USA IP INDIAN IP GMAIL
BUY GMAIL ACCOUNTS PVA USA IP INDIAN IP GMAILBUY GMAIL ACCOUNTS PVA USA IP INDIAN IP GMAIL
BUY GMAIL ACCOUNTS PVA USA IP INDIAN IP GMAIL
 
Forecast of Content Marketing through AI
Forecast of Content Marketing through AIForecast of Content Marketing through AI
Forecast of Content Marketing through AI
 
Local SEO Domination: Put your business at the forefront of local searches!
Local SEO Domination:  Put your business at the forefront of local searches!Local SEO Domination:  Put your business at the forefront of local searches!
Local SEO Domination: Put your business at the forefront of local searches!
 
Moving beyond multi-touch attribution - DigiMarCon CanWest 2024
Moving beyond multi-touch attribution - DigiMarCon CanWest 2024Moving beyond multi-touch attribution - DigiMarCon CanWest 2024
Moving beyond multi-touch attribution - DigiMarCon CanWest 2024
 
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdfTOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
TOP DUBAI AGENCY OFFERS EXPERT DIGITAL MARKETING SERVICES.pdf
 
Social Samosa Guidebook for SAMMIES 2024.pdf
Social Samosa Guidebook for SAMMIES 2024.pdfSocial Samosa Guidebook for SAMMIES 2024.pdf
Social Samosa Guidebook for SAMMIES 2024.pdf
 
Cost-effective tactics for navigating CPC surges
Cost-effective tactics for navigating CPC surgesCost-effective tactics for navigating CPC surges
Cost-effective tactics for navigating CPC surges
 
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly BulletinBLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
BLOOM_April2024. Balmer Lawrie Online Monthly Bulletin
 
Top 5 Breakthrough AI Innovations Elevating Content Creation and Personalizat...
Top 5 Breakthrough AI Innovations Elevating Content Creation and Personalizat...Top 5 Breakthrough AI Innovations Elevating Content Creation and Personalizat...
Top 5 Breakthrough AI Innovations Elevating Content Creation and Personalizat...
 
Mastering SEO in the Evolving AI-driven World
Mastering SEO in the Evolving AI-driven WorldMastering SEO in the Evolving AI-driven World
Mastering SEO in the Evolving AI-driven World
 
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel LeminTurn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
 
Netflix Ads The Game Changer in Video Ads – Who Needs YouTube.pptx (Chester Y...
Netflix Ads The Game Changer in Video Ads – Who Needs YouTube.pptx (Chester Y...Netflix Ads The Game Changer in Video Ads – Who Needs YouTube.pptx (Chester Y...
Netflix Ads The Game Changer in Video Ads – Who Needs YouTube.pptx (Chester Y...
 
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel LeminTurn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
Turn Digital Reputation Threats into Offense Tactics - Daniel Lemin
 
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdfBrand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
Brand experience Dream Center Peoria Presentation.pdf
 
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentationKraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
Kraft Mac and Cheese campaign presentation
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 150 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 150 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 150 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 150 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Unraveling the Mystery of Roanoke Colony: What Really Happened?
Unraveling the Mystery of Roanoke Colony: What Really Happened?Unraveling the Mystery of Roanoke Colony: What Really Happened?
Unraveling the Mystery of Roanoke Colony: What Really Happened?
 

2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia

  • 2. Informed Public ‣ 8 years in 20+ markets ‣ Represents 15% of total global population ‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries Must meet 4 criteria: ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College educated ‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each country ‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news General Online Population ‣ 5 years in 25+ markets ‣ Ages 18+ ‣ 1,150 respondents per country Methodology 28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000). Country- specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100). ‣ 16 years of data ‣ 33,000+ respondents total ‣ All fieldwork was conducted between October 13th and November 16th, 2015 Online Survey in 28 Countries Mass Population ‣ All population not including Informed Public ‣ Represents 85% of total global population 2
  • 3. Trust in Retrospect 3 Rising Influence of NGOs 2001 Business Must Partner with Government to Regain Trust 2009 Fall of the Celebrity CEO 2002 Earned Media More Credible Than Advertising 2003 U.S. Companies in Europe Suffer Trust Discount 2004 Trust Shifts from “Authorities” to Peers 2005 “A Person Like Me” Emerges as Credible Spokesperson 2006 Business More Trusted Than Government and Media 2007 Young Influencers Have More Trust in Business 2008 Trust is Now an Essential Line of Business 2010 Rise of Authority Figures 2011 Fall of Government 2012 Crisis of Leadership 2013 Business to Lead the Debate for Change 2014 Trust is Essential to Innovation 2015 Growing Inequality of Trust 2016
  • 4. 76 67 61 50 41 27 51 38 36 37 23 21 Trust Matters Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. Q377-380. Still thinking about the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you do not trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 4 Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies Refused to buy products/services Criticized companies Shared negative opinions Disagreed with others Paid more than wanted Sold shares Chose to buy products/services Recommended them to a friend/colleague Shared positive opinions online Defended company Paid more Bought shares most trusted content creators:#1 Friends and Family most trusted media source:#1 Online Search Engines General Population
  • 6. 49 Ireland 47 Turkey 46 Sweden 42 Poland 42 Russia 41 Japan 49 Australia 49 Italy 49 U.S. 47 Hong Kong 46 Spain 45 S. Africa 42 Germany 42 S. Korea 42 U.K. 41 France 41 Ireland 41 Turkey 39 Russia 38 Japan 37 Sweden 35 Poland 73 China 66 UAE 65 India 64 Singapore 62 Indonesia 60 Mexico 82 China 78 India 74 UAE 72 Mexico 72 Singapore 70 Indonesia 64 U.S. 63 Australia 63 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Colombia 56 Canada 55 Colombia 52 Netherlands 51 Argentina 51 Malaysia 50 Brazil58 Brazil 58 Italy 58 Malaysia 57 U.K. 55 France 54 S. Africa 53 Argentina 53 Spain 52 Hong Kong 51 Germany 50 S. Korea Trust Index: General Population Lags Average trust in institutions, Informed Public vs. General Population, 2016 Nearly 6 in 10 countries are distrusters among the General Population The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. 28-country global total. Informed Public General Population 60 Global 50 Global 6 Trusters Neutrals Distrusters
  • 7. 55 Global 60 Global 82 China 78 India 74 UAE 72 Mexico 72 Singapore 70 Indonesia 64 U.S. 63 Australia 63 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Colombia 84 UAE 79 India 78 Indonesia 75 China 65 Singapore 64 Netherlands 49 Ireland 47 Turkey 46 Sweden 42 Poland 42 Russia 41 Japan 48 Italy 48 S. Africa 47 Hong Kong 47 S. Korea 46 U.K. 45 Argentina 45 Poland 45 Russia 45 Spain 45 Sweden 40 Turkey 37 Ireland 37 Japan 58 Brazil 58 Italy 58 Malaysia 57 U.K. 55 France 54 S. Africa 53 Argentina 53 Spain 52 Hong Kong 51 Germany 50 S. Korea 59 Brazil 59 Mexico 56 Malaysia 53 Canada 52 Australia 52 France 52 U.S. 50 Germany Trust Index: Informed Public Drives Rebound Average trust in institutions, Informed Public, 2015 vs. 2016 2015 2016 Informed Public trust up 5 points Trusters from 22% in 2015 to 39% in 2016 Distrusters from 48% in 2015 to 21% in 2016 Trusters Neutrals Distrusters 7 The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. 27-country global total.
  • 8. 49 Australia 49 Italy 49 U.S. 47 Hong Kong 46 Spain 45 S. Africa 42 Germany 42 S. Korea 42 U.K. 41 France 41 Ireland 41 Turkey 39 Russia 38 Japan 37 Sweden 35 Poland 73 China 66 UAE 65 India 64 Singapore 62 Indonesia 60 Mexico 57 Mexico 55 Canada 55 Colombia 52 Netherlands 50 Argentina 50 Malaysia 48 Brazil 47 Australia 47 Italy 46 Hong Kong 45 U.S. 44 S. Africa 44 Spain 42 Germany 40 S. Korea 40 U.K. 39 France 39 Ireland 39 Russia 39 Turkey 38 Japan 36 Sweden 34 Poland 71 China 65 UAE 62 India 62 Indonesia 62 Singapore 56 Canada 55 Colombia 52 Netherlands 51 Argentina 51 Malaysia 50 Brazil Trust Index: Mass Population Left Behind Average trust in institutions, Informed Public vs. General Population vs. Mass Population For the mass population, 17 of 28 countries are distrusters The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs. 28-country global total. General Population Mass Population 50 Global 48 Global 49 Ireland 47 Turkey 46 Sweden 42 Poland 42 Russia 41 Japan 82 China 78 India 74 UAE 72 Mexico 72 Singapore 70 Indonesia 64 U.S. 63 Australia 63 Canada 62 Netherlands 61 Colombia 58 Brazil 58 Italy 58 Malaysia 57 U.K. 55 France 54 S. Africa 53 Argentina 53 Spain 52 Hong Kong 51 Germany 50 S. Korea Informed Public 60 Global For the mass population, the global index falls into distruster territory 8 Trusters Neutrals Distrusters
  • 9. 59 60 46 46 61 58 45 39 67 67 46 45 71 67 59 34 Trust in Malaysia Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Malaysia 9 Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2015 vs. 2016 Informed Public General Population NGOs Business Media Government +4 0 +13 -11 2015 2016 +2 -2 -1 -7
  • 10. 68 76 75 67 71 58 65 65 59 61 49 60 54 45 34 52 59 51 46 39 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 65 63 72 67 67 58 64 62 60 58 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Malaysia 10 Percent trust in the four institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 2012 vs. 2016 47 60 59 46 59 46 58 51 46 45 NGO’s Government Media Business A five year view of Malaysia Informed Public General Population
  • 11. 50% 41 75 68 47 51 37 44 41 35 36 34 30 28 22 27 23 15 16 83 68 65 51 48 40 46 27 32 23 42 79 74 53 53 45 45 42 39 39 36 35 32 32 30 26 26 16 32 80 65 58 49 45 39 39 24 21 19 Global27 China Singapore Canada Russia Australia HongKong Turkey US Japan UK SouthKorea Mexico Ireland Italy Argentina Spain SouthAfrica Colombia UAE India Indonesia Netherlands Sweden Germany Malaysia France Brazil Poland Government Increases Slightly Worldwide Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total. 11 Percent trust in government, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016 General Population Increased/equal trust in 17 countries +10 +11 -11 2015 2016
  • 12. 50% 55 46 19 21 28 48 41 45 42 47 44 57 46 50 46 63 52 49 58 55 55 51 69 62 64 73 73 79 81 87 47 37 15 20 24 31 31 33 33 34 34 36 36 37 39 45 46 47 49 49 49 57 64 64 65 69 70 74 81 83 Global GDP5 Japan France Germany U.K. Australia Italy S.Korea Netherlands Sweden Poland HongKong Canada Russia U.S. Singapore Turkey Ireland S.Africa Spain Malaysia Mexico Argentina Brazil China UAE Indonesia Colombia India In 19 of 28 countries, less than half of Mass Population think they will be better off in five years Malaysia More Optimistic than the majority of countries Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q445. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing in five years' time? (Top 2 Box, ‘Much better off than today,’ and ‘Somewhat better off than today.’) Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 12 Percent of the Informed Public vs. Mass Population who believe they and their families will be better off in five years’ time Informed Public Mass Population 17 10 12 13 10 21 10 13 18
  • 13. 2 Peer to peer in a changing media landscape
  • 14. 50% 45 64 55 48 52 54 51 45 41 42 39 41 41 34 31 30 33 28 18 70 68 62 50 46 45 39 42 38 47 73 60 58 55 55 54 53 50 49 47 45 43 42 39 38 36 31 23 55 63 63 59 47 45 44 38 38 34 Global China Singapore Mexico Canada Netherlands Brazil Argentina Italy Spain US SouthAfrica SouthKorea Australia Ireland Japan UK Sweden Turkey Colombia India Indonesia UAE HongKong Malaysia Germany France Russia Poland Media Increases Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [MEDIA IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total. 14 Percent trust in media, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016 General Population +10 Increased trust in 18 countries 2015 2016
  • 15. Power of Peer-Driven Media Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - How often do you read, view, click on or engage with the following types of content, media or information sources? Online search engines, such as Google… (Q285), Television news and information (Q287), Social networking sites, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter, etc.(Net of Q278 Social Networking, Q279 Blogs, Q289 Online message boards, forums or newsgroups), articles in printed newspapers (Q284), articles in printed magazines(Q283), Blogs (Q279) (Several times a week+) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 15 Percent who use each media source several times a week or more General Population 81 77 68 56 41 41 Social Search TV Newspapers Magazines Blogs 2 of top 3 most-used sources of news and information are peer- influenced media
  • 16. Millennials Peer-Driven Media Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q278-597 How often do you read, view, click on or engage with the following types of content, media or information sources? Online search engines, such as Google… (Q285), Television news and information (Q287), Social networking sites, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter, etc.(Net of Q278 Social Networking, Q279 Blogs, Q289 Online message boards, forums or newsgroups), articles in printed newspapers (Q284), articles in printed magazines(Q283), Blogs (Q279) (Several times a week+) General Population Millennials (aged 21-34), Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 16 Percent who use each media source several times a week or more, 2015 vs 2016 General Population 85 82 66 60 42 39 83 81 62 49 46 37 Social Search TV Newspapers Blogs Magazines 2015 2016 2 of top 3 most-used sources of news and information are peer- influenced media
  • 17. 57 61 59 57 4949 56 54 49 52 51 59 56 49 42 64 70 69 66 66 52 58 56 52 47 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Trust across the Media Landscape Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust it at all” and nine means that you “trust it a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population and Millennials, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. Trust in each source for general news and information *From 2012-2015, we included Online Search Engines as a media type. In 2016, we changed to Search Engines. **From 2012-2015, we included Hybrid as a media type. In 2016, we changed this over to Online-Only. Millennials even more trusting of digital media than general population Industry Millenials Gap Search Engines* 69% 3 Online-only Media** 58% 6 Traditional Media 52% 3 Owned media 52% 5 Social media 44% 2 General Population
  • 18. 67 66 59 52 47 49 52 52 27 35 74 73 68 57 53 49 45 40 32 30 My friends and family An academic expert Companies that I use A company CEO Elected officials Employees of a company A well-known online personality A journalist Companies [brands] I don’t use Celebrities Every Voice Matters Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q598-609. Thinking about the information you consume, how much do you trust the information from each of the following authors or content creators? (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 18 Percent who trust information created by each author on social networking sites, content sharing sites and online-only information sources, 2015 vs. 2016 2015 2016 General Population +9 50%
  • 19. 70 69 62 51 55 53 50 41 40 69 67 58 57 56 51 43 37 35 Peers More Credible than Leaders Source: 2016 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-587. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 19 Percent who rate each spokesperson as extremely/very credible 2015 2016 +6 Technical Expert Academic Expert A person like yourself Financial Industry Analyst EmployeeCEO NGO representative Board of Directors Government official/regul ator Person like yourself credibility increased the most General Population
  • 20. 20 “This year’s data reinforces the trusted role that search and social technology platforms play in taking a fragmented landscape of published content and re-aggregating it in a fashion that often directly reflects an individual’s worldview. The data reinforces the need to build integrated communications programs that map the total journey stakeholders take to consume information.” Steve Rubel Chief Content Strategist
  • 21. Influence The Inversion of Influence 21 Influence & Authority Authority Old Model ‣ Elites have access to more/better information ‣ Elites’ interests interconnected with those of mass ‣ Becoming an “elite” open to all New Reality ‣ Peer-to-peer influence more powerful than top- down ‣ Increasing distrust among mass population ‣ Mass movements based on dissatisfaction and urgency The Divide ‣ Democratization of information and more information ‣ High-profile revelations of greed and misbehavior ‣ Income inequality
  • 22. The Inversion of Influence 22Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, Malaysia. Mass Population Authority & Influence Influence Authority 85% of population 50 Trust Index 15% of population 58 Trust Index Informed Public
  • 23. 3 Business can Provide Leadership in a Divided World
  • 24. 50% Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. [BUSINESS IN GENERAL] [GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.“ (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 27-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 48 47 64 70 58 68 65 59 56 57 48 51 43 46 51 36 44 30 46 36 40 32 42 38 36 37 30 60 57 53 50 76 71 70 69 67 64 60 60 57 56 53 52 51 48 46 46 46 43 43 42 42 39 38 38 33 58 56 Global27 GDP5 Mexico Indonesia China India UAE Brazil S.Africa Singapore Italy Canada Argentina Australia U.S. Spain UK France Sweden Ireland Japan Turkey Germany HongKong Poland Russia S.Korea Malaysia Netherlands Global Increase in Business Trust 24 Percent trust in business, General Population, 2015 vs. 2016 Increased or equal trust in business in 26 countries +12 +12 +10 +12 +16 +10 General Population 2015 2016
  • 25. 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% Sector Trends: Financial Services Rebounds Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q45-429. Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, Malaysia *From 2012-2014, Pharma included as subsector(Q61f-65f). **From 2012-2015, Pharma included as an industry sector (Q43-60). 2012-2014 data recalibrated as a sector. Trust in each industry sector, 2012 - 2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Industry 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 5 yr. Trend Technology 80% 85% 81% 83% 81% 1 Pharmaceutical 66% 73% 67% 70% 81% 15 Automotive 70% 79% 76% 79% 74% 4 Telecommunications 73% 81% 72% 75% 71% 2 Food & Beverage 69% 76% 69% 69% 68% 1 Energy 65% 75% 69% 69% 68% 3 Financial Services 67% 72% 69% 67% 67% 0 Consumer Packaged Goods 59% 69% 64% 69% 64% 5 General Population 25
  • 26. 78 70 68 64 66 58 62 58 63 55 55 45 42 33 33 31 80 72 71 70 69 65 64 63 61 61 57 57 47 39 38 37 28 Japan UK Australia Germany Switzerland SouthKorea Sweden Canada France US Italy Netherlands Spain China India Brazil Mexico 2015 2016 50% Trust in National Identity of Companies Mainly Unchanged Q26-422. [TRACKING] Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific countries. Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following countries to do what is right. Use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. [RANDOMIZE. SELECT ONE RESPONSE] Trust in companies based on country of origin, 2015 - 2016 General Population Significant Increase
  • 27. 71 67 59 34 66 77 64 39 61 58 45 39 63 68 54 41 NGOs Business Media Government Business Most Trusted to Keep Pace Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Q441-444 Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to keep up with the changing times using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all to keep up with change” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal to keep up with change”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, Malaysia. 27 Percent trust, and percent who trust each institution to keep up with the changing times, 2016 Informed Public General Population Trust Trusted to keep pace Business in the lead
  • 28. Business Must Lead to Solve Problems Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. . 85% agree “A company can take specific actions that both increase profits and improve the economic and social conditions in the community where it operates.” up from 78% in 2015 General Population 28
  • 29. Purpose Impacts Trust Percent who cite each as a reason for why their trust in business has increased or decreased Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q328-329. For which of the following reasons, if any, has your trust in each institution listed below increased over the past year? Q330-331. For which of the following reasons, if any, has your trust in each institution listed below decreased over the past year? General Population, Malaysia Reasons Trust in Business Has Increased Reasons Trust in Business Has Decreased Produces economic growth Contributes to the greater good Productive member of society Lacks economic growth Provides few public services Fails to contribute to the greater good 62% 55% 45% 46% 42% 41% General Population 29
  • 30. Access to education/training Address income inequality Access to healthcare Protecting/improving the environment Reducing poverty Supporting human & civil rights Modern infrastructure E E P H Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q561-573 Thinking about businesses in your country, how important is it that they play a role in solving each of the following societal issues? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that it is “not at all important” and nine means that it is “extremely important”. (Top 4 Box, Importance) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of one quarter the sample. Societal Expectations Vary 30 Most important issue for business to address in each country Canada Brazil Germany France China U.S. Poland Argentina Sweden Mexico U.K. Ireland Netherlands Turkey Singapore Hong Kong Malaysia Colombia Japan Australia Russia S. Korea Italy Spain Indonesia UAE S. Africa India General Population R I I E E R H E E E E E P P E H P E H H H E E E E E P I H E I
  • 31. Purpose and Profits Matter Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q496-506. How visible do you think a CEO should personally be in these different types of business situations? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that it is “not visible at all” and nine means that it is “extremely visible”. (Top 4 Box, Visible) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 31 Percent who agree that CEOs should be personally visible in discussing… 80% Societal Issues ‣ Income inequality ‣ Public policy discussions ‣ Personal views on societal issues 72% Financial Results General Population
  • 32. Company NOT engaged in societal issues Company engaged in societal issues Employee Advocacy Increases With Societal Issue Engagement 32 Percent who agree with each statement, comparing those who work at companies/for CEOs involved in addressing broader societal issues vs. those who do not 58 66 73 68 78 73 85 Recommend company as an employer Stay working for the company Recommend products and services to others Confidence in the future of the company Committed to achieving our strategy Motivated to perform Do the best possible job for the customer Impact of Company Engagement 4 16 9 19 12 18 25 89 89 87 87 85 84 83 General Population Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q527-529. Does your company and your company’s CEO get involved in addressing broader societal issues beyond the core business, through programs or relationships with other companies? Q530-536. Thinking about your current company, please indicate how much you agree with each of the following statements using a 9-point scale where one means that you “strongly disagree” and nine means that you “strongly agree”. (Top 4 Box, Agree) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample.
  • 33. 65 60 40 48 48 50 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 62 62 63 64 64 64 72 73 76 76 77 77 78 79 83 85 89 Global GDP5 Japan Russia France Sweden Australia S.Korea Poland U.K. Italy HongKong Ireland Germany Netherlands Spain Turkey Canada U.S. S.Africa Singapore Malaysia UAE Indonesia Brazil Argentina China India Colombia Mexico 50% Malaysian Employees More Trusting Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q525-526. Thinking about your own company and other companies in your industry, please indicate how much you trust each to do what is right using a nine-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, 28-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. 33 Percent who trust the company for which they work TrustedNot Trusted General Population
  • 34. Integrity 38% 56% 18 Has Ethical Business Practices 39% 57% 18 Takes Responsible Actions To Address An Issue Or A Crisis 36% 53% 17 Has Transparent And Open Business Practices 40% 57% 17 Engagement 38% 55% 17 Treats Employees Well 38% 56% 18 Listens To Customer Needs And Feedback 38% 57% 19 Places Customers Ahead Of Profits 37% 54% 17 Communicates Frequently And Honestly On The State Of Its Business 39% 54% 15 Products 38% 50% 12 Offers High Quality Products Or Services 41% 59% 18 Is An Innovator Of New Products, Services Or Ideas 35% 41% 6 Purpose 33% 46% 13 Works To Protect And Improve The Environment 34% 50% 16 Creates Programs That Positively Impact The Local Community 34% 47% 13 Addresses Society's Needs In Its Everyday Business 33% 47% 14 Partners With NGOs, Government And Third Parties To Address Societal Issues 29% 39% 10 Operations 34% 43% 9 Has Highly-Regarded And Widely Admired Top Leadership 33% 44% 11 Ranks On A Global List Of Top Companies, Such As Best To Work For Or Most Admired 31% 39% 8 Delivers Consistent Financial Returns To Investors 37% 46% 9 Trust Building Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q80-95 How important is each of the following attributes to building your TRUST in a company? Use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust” in a company. (Top 2 Box, Importance) Q114-129 Please rate businesses in general on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a 9- point scale where one means they are "performing extremely poorly" and nine means they are "performing extremely well". (Top 2 Box, Performance) General Population, Malaysia. Company Importance vs. Performance ImportancePerformance Gap General Population 34
  • 35. 31 36 20 35 32 42 34 37 37 34 49 40 32 29 49 27 28 32 21 28 29 25 26 18 23 20 18 25 19 19 3 6 6 14 10 9 Employees Are Essential Advocates Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Q610 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company's financial earnings and operational performance, and top leadership’s accomplishments? Q611 A company’s business practices and handling of a crisis: Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s business practices, both positive and negative, and its handling of a crisis? Q612 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s employee programs, benefits and working conditions, and how a company serves its customers and prioritizes customer needs ahead of company profits? Q613 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s partnerships with NGOs and effort to address societal issues, including those to positively impact the local community? Q614 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s innovation efforts and new product development? Q615 Who do you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company’s stand on issues related to the industry in which it operates? General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 35 Most trusted spokesperson to communicate each topic Innovation effortsFinancial earnings & operational performance Business practices/ crisis handling Treatment of employees/customer Partnerships/ Programs to address societal issues Views on industry issues Employees Most Trusted General Population Company CEO Senior executive Employee Activist consumer Academic Media spokesperson
  • 36. 3 Providing a focus for CEOs
  • 37. CEO Focus Misplaced Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q451-461. Thinking about CEOs, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements? (Top 4 Box, Agree/Bot 5 Box, Disagree) General Population, Malaysia [‘CEOs do too much lobbying,’ ‘CEOs can be trust to create jobs,’ ‘Given that the average tenure of CEOs is just 4 years, CEOs aren’t in their role long enough to make a positive impact,’ ‘CEOs are too focused on short-term financial results,’] 37 Percent who agree with each statement about CEOs Too Much Focus on short-term financial results59% Lobbying57% Not Enough Job creation38% Positive long-term impact61% General Population
  • 38. 67% 73% 81%83% Their education and how it shaped them Their personal success story The obstacles they have overcome Their personal values Personal Values and History Matter Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q507-514. Thinking about how a CEO communicates with a variety of groups and individuals, how important are each of the following activities a CEO could engage in? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust”. (Top 4 Box, Important) General Population, 28-country global total, question asked of half the sample. [Media Engagement net = Q507 ‘Interviews with the media,’ and ‘Q512 ‘Sharing their views on a blog or on social media.’ Direct Engagement net = Q508 ‘Communications with employees,’ and ‘Participation in industry conferences.’] Q516-524. For you to trust a CEO, how important is it that you have information on each of the following aspects of the CEO’s personal life outside of their business? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that attribute is “not at all important to building your trust” and nine means it is “extremely important to building your trust. (Top 4 Box, Important) General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. Percent who agree that each type of information is important in building trust in a CEO General Population 38
  • 39. 76 67 61 50 41 27 51 38 36 37 23 21 Trust Matters Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q371-589. Thinking back over the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. Q377-380. Still thinking about the past 12 months, have you taken any of the following actions in relation to companies that you do not trust? Please answer yes or no to each action. General Population, Malaysia, question asked of half the sample. 39 Percent who engage in each behavior based on trust Behaviors for Distrusted Companies Behaviors for Trusted Companies Refused to buy products/services Criticized companies Shared negative opinions Disagreed with others Paid more than wanted Sold shares Chose to buy products/services Recommended them to a friend/colleague Shared positive opinions online Defended company Paid more Bought shares most trusted content creators:#1 Friends and Family most trusted media source:#1 Online Search Engines General Population

Notas del editor

  1. Hello everyone. Welcome. Thanks for coming.
  2. IT
  3. IT
  4. IT - Trust is not an abstract concept or an afterthought. It is directly linked to how people behave. Your credibility determines whether people consume your products, services and message or choose an alternative. In the all-important realm of social media, trust determines whether they will recommend and defend you or be your harshest critics. Trust may even matter more in Malaysia than elsewhere….. Choose to buy: 76 Vs 68 (global figure) Recommended them to a friend/colleague: 67 Vs 59 (global figure) Shared positive opinions online: 61 Vs 41 (global figure)
  5. IT - So what do this year’s results tell us about the state of trust in 2016?
  6. IT – choose data points. But among the General Population, things look very different. Compare the chart on the right to that on the left: instead of just a handful of distrusters for Informed Public, 60% of the General Population are distrusters, even where economies are good. For example, look at the difference in the U.S. 64% of Informed Public say they’re trusting; while only 49% Gen Pop thinks that. Also notice that all the trusting countries for general population are in Asia. It’s as if you’re looking through the world through two different sets of glasses.
  7. IT - Even in a year where we have had profound change and many high-profile scandals (FIFA’s leadership ousted, leadership of Brazil’s biggest bank arrested, Germany’s Deutsche Bank issues) -- even with these, the number of distrusting countries fell substantially among Informed Publics vs. last year and previous years. Overall, Informed Public trust is up 5 points, and the number of truster countries has increased from just a handful to nearly 40% of the total. ===== Country Insights: China: Trust still up +7 despite Q3 2015 market crash Communist Party in October 2015 outlines a new development approach, with a focus on innovation and reassured the public that market fundamentals and reforms are on track = gov’t proactive in shaping public’s perceptions through formalized agendas Growing start-ups with tremendous VC support Local MNCs doing well with Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei and Lenovo Government has enabled shared economy infrastructure and business People have mixed feelings on hidden government intervention to protect shareholders/investors translating into public economic “rescue” No major corruption scandals due to gov’t efforts Psychological disposition of people Booming internet + technology enhancing consumer experience- elevating consumption Expectation for media to “do the right thing” UAE: Drop is economic driven: prospect of long-term depressed oil prices and unknown economic consequences NOT a drop in trust in government ; still remains the among the most trusting environments Reflects the broader macroeconomic story in the region Uncertainly over the regional conflicts (KSA, Iran) has affected public confidence on geo political stability Italy: Among distrusters last year, now in neutral zone Driven by economic recovery, though slow, forecasting higher growth rate in 2016 Exports driving economic growth Benefiting from success of Expo 2015 in Milan Reforming attitudes driven by PM Matteo Renzi, who initiated a constitutional reform resulting in a referendum and Jobs Act that changed labor market’s legislative infrastructure- well received in business segments Unemployment down to 11.5% vs. 13% in 2015 Higher trust in media driven by expose, Mafia Capitale, which uncovered the corruption scandal in Rome Australia: surprise to Australians- with new power regime: The Turnbull Effect New PM brought a fast economic rebound- but now public wants more tangible results New administration is cited as the core reason behind the sustainability of booming real estate sector Banks and business sector are confident despite commodities crash, turmoil in China (AUS’ major trading partner) Experiencing strong economic position,: Effects felt more with informed public: higher property values Employment levels within skilled/tertiary educated workers remained high with big demand for professional work force All driving a more positive outlook and linked with higher personal wealth levels and higher pension funds UK: turning to conservative economic policies and no opposition to new Conservative party Strong economic performance geographically insulated from immigration crisis/China crash/terrorism Not seen any larger scandals Business has a positive role to play in social and economic development: has become a channel for positive government initiatives
  8. IT - The difference is even more profound when you look at the Mass Population—that segment of the General Population that does not include the Informed Public. The global Index for the mass population falls into distruster territory as 17 of 28 – more than half– of countries are distrusters These distrusters include nearly all European countries, the US, and other significant economies from around the world. While the Informed Public is becoming more trusting, the mass population is being left behind.
  9. RK – NGO & Govt story. NGOs are most trusted across the world and the same is true in Malaysia. Business trust continues to rise globally but is static or marginally declining in Malaysia. Malaysia saw one of the highest increases in trust in media in the region for informed publics. And Government continues to be the least trusted of the four institutions around the world, and that is again true in Malaysia.
  10. RK – Trend and implications. GE13 gave bump. Anomaly in media. Trust in business, media and government is falling as the general population of Malaysians grow weary of scandals and how they have been handled. That’s the bad news from the Edelman Trust Barometer 2016. The good news is that it can be fixed – if chief executives and senior officials step up with more transparency and greater commitment to tackling broader social challenges.
  11. RK/IT – Globally, Govt is the least trusted of the four main institutions of society. SIN/AUS data points. Election bumps. And we saw that in Malaysia in 2013 too. Malaysia is in the top half of trust in govts. across all countries we surveyed. Context – everything is relative.
  12. RK – Good news Malaysia. What I’d call the ‘Happy Chart’ Repeat Q. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing in five years' time? (Top 2 Box, ‘Much better off than today,’ and ‘Somewhat better off than today.’) In Malaysia we’re in top one-third of all countries for optimism. And that optimism is driven by Mass more than informed publics. There is concern around future expectations among the global audience. In more than two-thirds of the nations surveyed, the mass population believe they will not be better off in five years’ time, while more than half of informed publics are optimistic about their future economic prospects. 
  13. RK - Trust can be built or eroded in many ways but understanding the impact of Peer to Peer on trust in Malaysia is worth exploring. How we consume information, how much we trust that information and who gives it to us, is changing. If you’re in the business of communication we need to adapt.
  14. Media in high trust mkts: role is not the 4th Estate – it’s to help guide the country in developing (good news stories and nation building – China & UAE) Rebound in certain markets where it is already performing the role of 4th estate – UK, US & Aus A watch out! – globally trust in media on rise but ½ in rooms like this one don’t trust media
  15. RK - This shift in influence is created in great part by the dramatic changes in where people go for news and information. If you look at the most-frequently referenced media sources, you can see that 2 of the top 3 are peer-driven media: social, and search, where the behavior of other search engines and users own profiles will affect the rankings of the results you see.
  16. Small dips across the board for Millenials, with exception of Blogs. Newspapers down 11 points.
  17. RK – 1 No channel is a massive winner. 2 Search engines an aggregation of all others 3 Unpack social in a minute….. As we know, fragmentation and re-aggregation means the media landscape is changing dramatically. Today, it is no longer enough to rely on traditional media for your message to be heard: you have to be everywhere that your stakeholders are. The most used media (social) is also the least trusted in Malaysia. Malaysians are now much less trusting of content shared on social media, with a seven-point drop to 42 percent that could be the result of rampant sharing of misinformation online in the past year. Trust in Traditional media dropped to 49—a significant decline over the last year. As doubts about traditional and social media rise, search engines held their lead as the most trusted source for information at 66 percent – largely because people have more control over what they read and see. Note that this year owned media—a company’s own channels—has surpassed social media in terms of trust. And for millennials, these trends are even more pronounced, with millennials indexing even higher in their trust of digital media platforms.
  18. We consume a lot of social content. We wanted to know how much do you trust the information from each author or content creator. Trust in content created by “friends and family” saw a 7-point jump from last year, keeping peers just ahead of academic experts as most trusted digital content creators. Trust in content created by “companies that I use” had the most significant increase. And with the increased trust in CEOs being seen as more credible content creators and the earlier rise in trust in owned media,…. this creates a remarkable opportunity for companies to connect with stakeholders directly. Watch out if you’re using celebrities (mindful of ROI) And if you’re a company they don’t use, don’t spam.
  19. RK – Here we’re talking about the credibility of the spokesperson. From an academic expert to the board of directors there’s a whole village of credible people. The latest survey shows a significant six-point jump in trust of peers or “a person like me” as credible spokespeople, eclipsing CEOs for the first time and reflecting the way people in Malaysia increasingly share and weigh information and opinions online. The main question to ask though, is how many of you have a diversified bench that you’re regularly using? Both from within your first team but also from within the fan base?
  20. IT
  21. IT – 1. the divide, 2 the old model and 3 new reality…. Today, peer influence is more powerful than top-down influence, and there is an increasing distrust and sense of dissatisfaction among the mass population. This has led to a significant divide between authority and influence. In the old model, those with authority had better access to information. There was a general sense that the interest of the elites were aligned with those of the masses, and that the opportunity to gain authority and influence was open to all who were willing to work hard. But, the old world no longer works. We are now operating in a new reality characterized by peer-to peer influence, a reality where there is a divide between influence and authority.
  22. Gone are the days if the traditional “pyramid of influence,” in which both authority and influence were concentrated in the hands of a small number of opinion shapers. This model was predicated on the belief that the informed publics have access to superior information, their interests were interconnected with those of the broader public and that becoming ‘an elite’ was open to all of those who work hard. But today, due primarily to the democratization of information, we have seen the pyramid turned upside down. Influence now rests among the broad population, who talk to each other on social media or use search to access information, and no longer need to rely on the more “informed” population for ideas. Influence is no longer automatically granted to those in authority. And, as we have seen, the Malaysian Mass Population’s view of the world—at a trust level of just 50—is significantly different from that of the 18% who have a trust level of 58, creating real challenge for those in authority who want to earn the ability to have broad influence. Gone are the days if the traditional “pyramid of influence,” in which both authority and influence were concentrated in the hands of a small number of opinion shapers. This model was predicated on the belief that the informed publics have access to superior information, their interests were interconnected with those of the broader public and that becoming ‘an elite’ was open to all of those who work hard. But today, due primarily to the democratization of information, we have seen the pyramid turned upside down. Influence now rests among the broad population, who talk to each other on social media or use search to access information, and no longer need to rely on the more “informed” population for ideas. Influence is no longer automatically granted to those in authority. And, as we have seen, the Malaysian Mass Population’s view of the world—at a trust level of just 50—is significantly different from that of the 18% who have a trust level of 58, creating real challenge for those in authority who want to earn the ability to have broad influence.
  23. IT - What does it mean to be a leader when we have a division of trust, where influence no longer flows directly from authority? Old ways of leadership won’t work. This is a new era of business, with a moral imperative for business to lead. So how can you lead in a divided world? Malaysians expect business to take a lead on social challenges and to do much more, to discuss public policy and issues such as income inequality.
  24. IT
  25. IT
  26. Sweden saw a significant rise in trust among general population, as did Switzerland and India.
  27. IT
  28. IT - The survey shows Malaysians see no conflict between doing well and doing good – with 85 percent agreeing that companies can act to raise profits while also improving economic and social conditions. But six in 10 people from the general population believe chief executives put too much emphasis on short-term financial results at the expense of job creation and long-term benefits  . Global comp – 80%  
  29. IT - Insert question: if you were more trusting in business than last year, what were your reasons? And purpose matters—it has a direct impact on trust. When asked for their most important reasons why trust in business has increased or decreased, you can see that of course they want you to do your job and deliver economic growth. But the nr 2 reason business trust increases? Contributing to the greater good. And this is also a big threat to trust: when asked why their trust in business might have decreased, a failure to contribute to greater good is in the top 3 of the list. Sidebar = one of few markets to “provide public services’
  30. IT – CSR sales pitch
  31. RK – Q - . How visible do you think a CEO should personally be in these different types of business situations? Not incompatible that they can be visible across both. Of course they expect CEOs to be talking about financials. But an even greater number also want to hear what CEOs have to say about societal issues; to take a stand on issues such as income inequality, public policy and their personal views on societal issues. We will unpack the role of the CEO a little later….
  32. RK - Percent who agree with each statement, comparing those who work at companies/for CEOs involved in addressing broader societal issues vs. those who do not. Call out just three benefits to those that engage on societal issues: 1 recommend their own products, 2 stay working for the company and 3 recommend the company as an employer Low hanging fruit if you want to grow a successful business.
  33. RK - Thinking about your own company – how much do you trust them to do what is right? Globally, only 2 in 3 employees trust the company they work for. As a business leader, having the trust of only 65% of your workforce is not a result that should be considered a good report card, given how influential these employees are. Good news for Malaysia: 3 out 4 do trust their own company. But still room to create advocates out of those one in four that don’t ; ) Don’t lose that trust – build employee engagement programmes, talk & listen to them, look after them. So how do you gain your employees trust? So how do we build trust with employees? Iain? Country Insights: France: Transitioning out of civil service mentality (jobs for life) Country is traumatized by fear of unemployment with limited economic culture Workforce is still marked by class war Trade unions now very weak and unrepresentative Japan: A Cultural Change + Generational Transformation- is skepticism increasing due to failure of companies allowing their employees to participate in the benefits of an economic revival? Historically, managers have not focused on EE because there was no need (because population had been homogenous) Now, after 20 years of deflation, globalism, accounting scandals, etc.- Japanese employees have become more skeptical of management With the absence of EE culture, this has reached a boiling point Abe administration has achieved some success in top level economic revival, but has not reached the general population Gov’t has been pressuring business to raise wages but has been very slow and met with much resistance Even through historically favorable cash positions of Japanese companies Crisis of pension system driving mistrust- blame is shifted to government and businesses Prospect of happy retirement disappearing = “underclass elderly”, poverty and misery of retired “former middle class” has been highlighted in the media UK: Return to the “Dickensian” work environment? Largest pay gap influencing public perceptions of fairness The perception that Management are not affected by austerity compared to working class people see CEOs doing much better… Media stories about companies like Sports Direct and how they treat their workers Senior management unaware of employee access to information about companies Unions have the lowest membership and now seen as public sector spokespeople
  34. IT
  35. IT
  36. RK - What does it mean to be a leader when we have this division of trust, where influence no longer flows directly from authority? Old ways of leadership won’t work. This is a new era of business, with a moral imperative for business to lead. So how can you lead in a divided world? Malaysians expect business to take a lead on social challenges and to do much more, to discuss public policy and issues such as income inequality.
  37. Rk – despite the best intentions of CEO’s ….Malaysians said….that….
  38. Rk – to build trust means revealing your human qualities. So the next time we’re drafting a release or a speech and the text comes back with strike through on those human qualities that we wanted to include… Well we now have the evidence to ask that their values and their personal story does indeed matter.
  39. IT – Comms perspective: 1 Roadmap for a trusting nation 2 developing peer driven trust 3 Trust for business by engaging societal issues 4 action plan for CEOs, now questions….