This slideshow begins with an explanation of the science that is driving climate change. As fossil fuels are burned, heat-trapping carbon dioxide enters the atmosphere, altering the Earth's natural carbon cycle. This has dangerous impacts around the world. Extreme temperatures are becoming the norm, which leads to catastrophic weather events like droughts that cause wildfires, or storms that cause floods. The longer it takes to reverse our emissions trends, the worse these weather events will become and the further away we get from ever reaching a stable climate. But there are solutions; natural gas has become increasingly cheaper in recent years and, if extracted and consumed properly, can offer a much cleaner energy source than traditional coal. Huge gains have been made in energy efficiency as well; in buildings, transportation, industry, and the electricity system. Renewable energy has also entered the playing field, with solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and storage now starting to be able to compete with traditional fossil fuels. Policy action is needed in order to maintain this transition toward cleaner energy. We need to manage our use of fossil fuels, expand energy efficiency, and accelerate renewables. Whether it's by state regulation, federal standards, or Congressional action, we have the opportunity to ensure a low-carbon future for the U.S. and the world.
3. 3
SCIENCE
CO2 concentrations are 40
percent higher than they
were during the Industrial
Revolution
CO2 concentrations likely
haven’t been this high in
millions of years
Scientists have long-known that CO2 is a heat-trapping gas
19. 19
IMPACTS
EXTREMES BECOME THE NORM
Increased strength and
frequency of climate-related
disasters
8 climate-related disasters in
2014 cost more than $1 billion
Existing trends are reinforced
and perpetuated
Colder, wetter east coast
Hotter, drier west coast
23. 23
METHANE RELEASE FROM MELTING TUNDRA
RUNAWAY FEEDBACK LOOPS
Melting permafrost could
raise global temperatures by
as much as 1.5°F by 2100
24. 24
WATER VAPOR CAPACITY
RUNAWAY FEEDBACK LOOPS
For every 1° increase in
temperature caused by CO2
emissions, water vapor will
cause an additional 1°
increase
25. 25
SLOWING CARBON ABSORPTION BY OCEAN
RUNAWAY FEEDBACK LOOPS
Warmer, more acidic
oceans absorb less (and
emit more) CO2
26. 26
CARBON MATH To stabilize concentrations at any level,
human emissions must get close to ZERO
C O 2 e
EMISSIONS
C O 2 e
CONCENTRATIONS
BUSINESS AS USUAL 450 PPM 650 PPM
GTCO2eEMISSIONSPERYEAR
CO2ePPMCONCENTRATIONS
0
30
60
90
120
150
2000 2025 2050 2075 2100
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
2000 2025 2050 2075 2100
Graph data come from Climate Interactive’s C-ROADS model
27. 27
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
Gigatons of
CO2/year
Business as usual
2030
start2020
start2010
start
Different pathways to 450ppm
Bigger drop
over less time
Smaller drop
over more time
THE COSTS OF DELAY
29. 29
HIGH ESTIMATE
METHANE LEAKAGE
LOW ESTIMATE
METHANE LEAKAGE
LIF E CYCLE E MISSIONS
Varied methane leakage during extraction affects the climate impact of natural gas
COAL
NATURAL GAS
Emits ½ as much
CO2 as coal
…But methane
leakage is a
HUGE concern
SOLUTIONS
Can natural gas save the day?
38. 38
SOLUTIONS
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Solar (PV and thermal)
Wind (onshore and offshore)
Biomass
Geothermal
Storage, CCS, small-scale
nuclear
Small modular reactor (Hyperion)
Eos Energy Storage
42. 42
POLICY
EXPAND ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Decouple utility profits from the
volume of electricity sold
Adopt Energy Efficiency Resource
Standards for utilities
Enact steadily tightening performance
standards for appliances and industrial
equipment
Adopt “best in class” building codes
43. 43
POLICY
ACCELERATE RENEWABLES
Introduce and expand Renewable
Portfolio Standards
Modernize grid operations
Fix the transmission system
Rethink utility business models
1/12 colder than normal; 1/6 average; 4/6 warmer than normal; 1/12 extremely above normal
The photo: Cattle farmer Marion Kujawa from Ashley, Illinois. The pond he uses to water his cattle has been drying up from the current drought.
U.S.’s midwest drought has extended beyond 2012 and into early 2013.
- Nearly 2/3 of U.S. was experiencing moderate to exceptional drought conditions in September 2012
- drought affected 67% of cattle production and 70-75% of corn and soybean production
- production estimates were down 27% for corn, 24% for sorghum, and 7% for soybeans
- Deutsche Bank Securities estimates drought will be responsible for nearly 1% drop in U.S. GDP for 2012. This comes out to about $35 billion in economic costs
Thailand floods of 2011, caused by monsoon rains and tropical storms
- 65 of Thailand’s 75 provinces experienced flooding, resulting in over 800 deaths
- estimated economic costs over $14 billion (USD), responsible for a decline of about 1.5% in Thailand’s GDP in 2011
- as much as $22 billion in property damages
- biggest impacts in Thailand’s manufacturing industries, especially for computer and automobile parts (global hard drive prices increased dramatically as a direct result of Thailand’s flooding damaging the industry)
Bushfires have raged through Victoria, Tasmania, and New South Wales, Australia in early 2013
- in January, there were more than 170 bushfires in New South Wales, 30 of which were uncontained
- heat, lightning strikes, and wind have carried fires across 350,000 hectares of land
- 33 homes and thousands of livestock have been lost in the fires
- temperatures in certain regions of southern Australia have hit nearly 50° C (or close to 120° F)
- In early January, the continent’s average temperature of 40.3° C (or 104.5° F) broke the previous heat record from 1972
Hurricane Sandy
- about $65 billion in economic costs and over 125 deaths in the U.S.
- considered a ‘superstorm’, with tropical force winds extended 820 miles at their widest
- 24 states in U.S. were affected, as well several Caribbean countries that were in Sandy’s travelling path
- more than 72,000 businesses and homes were destroyed in New Jersey alone
*Last year, professors at Stanford University conducted a survey about public perceptions about global warming and government involvement in the issue. The survey coincidentally had polled people right before and after Hurricane Sandy. Results demonstrated that Sandy had no significant influence on the public’s perception of the seriousness of global warming or that global warming causes storms. In fact, the survey found that the participants polled after Sandy occurred felt a desire for less federal government action for global warming mitigation and a reduction in personal importance of the issue of global warming.
Pine Beetle Forest in the Rocky Mountains. Without cold winters, pine beetles survive year-round and have expanded their range, leading to an explosive growth in their destruction of pine forests, which they use for habitat and food.
- Since 2003, 8% of forest coverage in continental 48 states have been severely damaged by insects, more than 4X the area affected by forest fires
As the Arctic temperatures rise, temperature differences between the Arctic and North America decrease, which changes the course of the jet stream known as the Polar Vortex. As the jet stream slows, its east-west motion fluctuates and experiences more north-south movement. While the jet stream typically keeps the frigid cold air in the arctic, increased fluctuation caused it to dip into North America in early 2014.
Impact: Record low temperatures (-16F in Chicago, wind chills in OK and TX were -40), half the country affected, 21 cold-related deaths,
Greenland now loses more than 100 billion tons of ice every year.
As temperatures rise in arctic regions, permafrost layers degrade. Under that permafrost sits large amounts of frozen organic material, which decays when it is thawed, releasing methane and CO2. Increased emissions contribute to the ‘greenhouse effect’ and warm the arctic further, causing more permafrost degradation. Global warming is occurring twice as fast in the Arctic than in other regions of the world. About 2% of global methane comes from Arctic latitudes. Methane emissions from the Arctic increased 31% between 2003 and 2007. This has the potential to increase the Arctic’s impact to 7% of global methane emissions. Melting permafrost is estimated to contribute to as much as 1.5 degrees F in global warming by 2100.
Water vapor is the largest positive feedback in the climate system. As temperatures rise, more water on the earth’s surface evaporates and turns to water vapor. Water vapor, like other greenhouse gases, traps heat and prevents it from escaping back into the atmosphere. Thus, the earth warms even more and water vapor capacity continues to increase. Scientists have predicted that water vapor roughly doubles the amount of warming caused by CO2, which means that if there is a 1 degree temperature increase caused by CO2, water vapor will cause the temperature to increase by an additional 1 degree.
Currently, oceans absorb approximately 40% of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere. However, as oceans warm and more plankton and sea plants reach their absorption limit, their capacity to store carbon dioxide decreases. More and more carbon dioxide emissions will remain in the atmosphere, further causing global warming through the ‘greenhouse effect’. Additionally, carbon dioxide disrupts the pH balance of the ocean, making it more acidic. This is detrimental to ocean life, especially coral reefs and shell-forming animals. As these plants and animals die, they contribute even further to carbon dioxide in the ocean due to their decomposition.
Currently, our CO2 emissions rate has been increasing over the years, which exponentially increases CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. It is important to note that, even if we stabilize the emissions rate, concentrations will continue to increase each year. The only way to keep concentrations flat is to completely eliminate any new carbon dioxide from entering into the atmosphere, or in other words, bring the emissions rate down to zero.
Scientists predict that we need to stay within an atmospheric concentration of 450 ppm to avoid irreversible consequences of climate change. In order to get as close as possible to this concentration, we will need to reverse our emissions rate within the next few years and bring it down to zero within the next several decades.
However, scientists estimate that, in reality, concentrations are more likely to stabilize around 650 ppm. In this scenario, we will continue on our high emissions path for the next few decades, reversing the emissions rate around 2050. As we allow the emissions rate to increase during those extra years, it will be difficult to drive it back down to initial rates (from ~90 Gt/year down to ~40 Gt/year) and even harder to continue driving it down to zero. This later start will also require more time to achieve zero emissions, which means that more emissions will build up meanwhile and further raise atmospheric concentration levels. The sooner we work to reduce emissions, the easier it will be. Stabilizing concentrations requires zero emissions. Further, stabilizing concentrations at a ‘safe’ level (closer to 450ppm) requires getting to zero emissions as soon as possible.
**Note that the lines in these graphs represent real data that was computed using C-ROADS modeling software. This is why some of the lines are not perfectly smooth.**
Source: Costs of Delay
The graph shows that CO2 may be lower for natural gas than coal, but when you factor in estimates for methane leakage (which can be anywhere between 1% and 10%), natural gas has the potential to be even more damaging to the atmosphere than coal’s CO2 emissions. Natural gas may be no better than coal if it has even a 3% estimate for methane leakage.
UC San Diego’s ‘Sustain UCSD’ initiative aims to enhance campus sustainability practices through programs in clean energy, alternative transportation, waste minimization, etc.
Image of UCSD’s 2.8 MW fuel cell, which provides about 8% of campus total energy needs. Another 85% of the campus energy is produced by a 30 MW natural gas-fired combined heat and power system, which saves the campus $8 million in energy costs each year.
A recent study from Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems reports that rooftop solar will soon be cost-competitive with coal in parts of Europe. Already, rooftop solar costs as low as .08-.14€/kWh. It estimates that levelized cost of energy could be as low as .04€/kWh in sunnier locations around the world by 2030.
The largest wind turbine in the world, located in Denmark, is over 700 feet tall and can generate up to 8 MW of power, enough to supply electricity to 3,000 American households.
Groups in Japan and Scotland have established pilot projects for floating offshore wind technologies. Floating wind turbines are beneficial because they open up new areas for wind capture and reduce/avoid the costs involved in turbine anchoring.
PNNL is working on a processing method that transforms algae into liquid crude oil in less than an hour. This is still a small-scale production - the lab can produce several liters of algae oil a day – but companies are hoping to build upon PNNL’s technology to ramp up commercial-scale production.
Within the last few days, Iceland unveiled a new geothermal project that takes advantage of heat from magma that flows underground. Iceland currently meets all of its electricity needs through geothermal and hydropower.
At first, it would appear that natural gas has the potential to save the day for us. Natural gas emits half the carbon dioxide that coal does. However, natural gas is only a solution if it is extracted, processes, and consumed correctly. Currently, there are several issues associated with natural gas that have yet to be addressed. Methane leakage is one of the biggest concerns that threatens the feasibility of natural gas as America’s next big energy source.
At first, it would appear that natural gas has the potential to save the day for us. Natural gas emits half the carbon dioxide that coal does. However, natural gas is only a solution if it is extracted, processes, and consumed correctly. Currently, there are several issues associated with natural gas that have yet to be addressed. Methane leakage is one of the biggest concerns that threatens the feasibility of natural gas as America’s next big energy source.
At first, it would appear that natural gas has the potential to save the day for us. Natural gas emits half the carbon dioxide that coal does. However, natural gas is only a solution if it is extracted, processes, and consumed correctly. Currently, there are several issues associated with natural gas that have yet to be addressed. Methane leakage is one of the biggest concerns that threatens the feasibility of natural gas as America’s next big energy source.
At first, it would appear that natural gas has the potential to save the day for us. Natural gas emits half the carbon dioxide that coal does. However, natural gas is only a solution if it is extracted, processes, and consumed correctly. Currently, there are several issues associated with natural gas that have yet to be addressed. Methane leakage is one of the biggest concerns that threatens the feasibility of natural gas as America’s next big energy source.
29 US companies (including all 5 major oil companies) are planning future business strategies around the likelihood of a carbon tax in coming years. Price estimates range from $6-60/ton CO2.