Más contenido relacionado La actualidad más candente (20) Similar a ASC 740 quarterly update (20) Más de Grant Thornton LLP (20) ASC 740 quarterly update1. CPE Credit is not available for viewing archived programs.
Please visit http://www.grantthornton.com/events for upcoming programs.
Accounting for income taxes:
ASC 740 quarterly update
Original Broadcast Date: September 2013
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
2. Today's
Presenters
Randy Robason
Chuck Evans
National Partner-in-Charge,
TARAS
Dallas, Texas
Partner,
Accounting Principles
Houston, Texas
Joe Calianno
Mark Ritter
Partner,
International Tax
Consulting
Washington, D.C.
Managing Director,
Compensation and
Benefits Consulting
Atlanta, Ga.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
2
4. ASC 740 quarterly update
Learning objectives
•
•
•
•
•
Identify updates in federal issues
Name significant international tax developments
Define accounting principles issues
Recognize significant state tax issues
Identify and discuss new compensation and
benefits developments
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
4
5. ASC 740 quarterly update
Agenda
• Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics
• International taxation
• Hot topics in accounting for taxes
• State and local taxation
• Compensation and benefits update
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
5
6. Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics
• Section 336(e) Regulations Issued
• IRS Guidance Issued after Supreme Court Strikes Down
DOMA
• Other Items You May Have Missed
• Never Too Early to Plan
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
6
6
7. Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics – Section 336(e) Regs.
What is the effect of a Sec. 336(e) election?
Who makes the election?
What is the effective date of the regulations?
Tax accounting implication
See T.D. 9619 for details.
Are you accounting for
the tax basis of acquired
assets properly?
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
7
8. Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics – IRS Issues DOMA Guidance
The Supreme Court held that section 3 of the
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional.
What are the implications?
Tax accounting implication
What did the IRS recently decide?
What should or can employers do?
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
8
•
FICA refunds should not be
accounted for under ASC
740, i.e., FICA is an excise
tax for the employer
9. Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics – Items You May Have Missed
What happened?
Tax Accounting?
• IRS will no longer issue
• Determining uncertain tax
Section 355 comfort letters
benefits under ASC 740-10
• Deduction denied for costs • Measured current tax
associated with stock
liability properly?
offering
• IRS cuts refundable
• Measured deferred tax
corporate AMT credit
asset properly?
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
9
9
10. Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics – Never Too Early to Plan
Sample of "Tax Extenders" That Will Expire at Dec.
31, 2013:
• Bonus depreciation; Increased Section 179
Expensing Limits; 15-year Straight-line Cost
Recovery for Qualified Leasehold, Restaurant and
Retail Improvements
• Credit for Increasing Research Activities
• Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC)
• Look-through Rule for Controlled Foreign
Corporations (CFCs)
• Subpart F Active Financing Income for CFCs
• and more…
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
10
Why worry?
• It's budget
season!
• Also, consider
ASC 740-10-30-2
in the future
11. ASC 740 quarterly update
Agenda
• Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics
• International taxation
• Hot topics in accounting for taxes
• State and local taxation
• Compensation and benefits update
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
11
12. Section 334(b)(1)(B)/362(e)(1) and the
Proposed Regulations
• Sections 334(b)(1)(B) and 362(e)(1) (the anti-loss
importation provisions) were enacted as part of the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 to prevent erosion of
the corporate tax base through the importation of loss in
nonrecognition transactions
– These provisions have been operative for a number of
years
– Section 334(b)(1)(B) cross-references section
362(e)(1)(B)
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
12
12
13. Section 334(b)(1)(B)/362(e)(1) and the
Proposed Regulations
• The anti-loss importation provisions apply when a
corporation acquires property that is described in section
362(e)(1)(B) in a transaction described in section
332, 362(a), or 362(b) and, under the generally applicable
basis rules (other than the anti-loss duplication rule in
section 362(e)(2) that applies in certain transactions), the
acquiring corporation (Acquiring) would take the property
with an aggregate basis in excess of value.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
13
13
14. Section 334(b)(1)(B)/362(e)(1) and the
Proposed Regulations
• Some typical transactions in which these provisions may
apply include:
– A liquidation of a foreign corporation into a U.S.
corporation in a section 332 liquidation,
– A foreign person's transfer of property to a domestic
corporation in a section 351 transfer, and
– A foreign corporation reorganizing into a U.S. corporation
in a section 368 reorganization.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
14
14
15. Section 334(b)(1)(B)/362(e)(1) and the
Proposed Regulations
– When an anti-loss importation provision applies,
Acquiring's basis in each such property is equal
to the property's value under these rules.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
15
15
16. Section 334(b)(1)(B)/362(e)(1) and the
Proposed Regulations
• Property is described in section 362(e)(1)(B) ("importation
property") if two conditions are satisfied:
– Any gain or loss recognized on a disposition of the
property would not be subject to Federal income tax in
the hands of the transferor immediately before the
transfer.
– Any gain or loss recognized on a disposition of the
property would be subject to Federal income tax in the
hands of the transferee immediately after the transfer.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
16
16
17. Section 334(b)(1)(B)/362(e)(1) and the
Proposed Regulations
• The IRS and Treasury recently issued proposed regulations
(REG-161948-05) under sections 334(b)(1)(B) and
362(e)(1) that address several issues relating to the
operation of these provisions including:
– The definition of importation property
– The treatment of partnerships, S corporations and
grantor trusts when such entities are involved in the
transaction
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
17
17
18. Section 334(b)(1)(B) / 362(e)(1) and the
Proposed Regulations
– Certain anti-avoidance rules that apply to domestic trusts,
estates, RICs, REITs and cooperatives that directly or
indirectly transfer property in a section 362 transaction, if
the property had been directly or indirectly transferred to
or acquired by the entity as part of a plan to avoid the
application of the anti-importation provisions.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
18
18
19. Section 334(b)(1)(B)/362(e)(1) and the
Proposed Regulations
– The application of the rules in the case of CFCs and
PFICs
– The interaction of sections 367(e)(1) and 367(e)(2)
– General operation of the rules
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
19
19
20. Distribution of importation property in a loss importation transaction
Example 1 - Liquidations under section 332
Prop. Reg. § 1.334-1
Facts
Analysis
On Date 1, FC distributes A1, A2 and A3
to USP in a complete liquidation that
qualifies under section 332.
1. Determine whether A1, A2 or A3 are
importation properties
•
•
U.S. Parent
("USP")
100%
Foreign Corporation
("FC")
FC Assets:
A1
A2
A3
•
Basis
$40
$120
$140
Value
$50
$30
Consider effect to transferor (FC) and
transferee (USP)
Assume that, if FC sold these assets
immediately before the transaction, no gain or
loss recognized on the sale would have been
taken into account in determining a Federal tax
liability.
•
The fact that any gain or loss recognized
by a CFC may affect an income inclusion
under section 951(a) does not alone
cause gain or loss recognized by the CFC
to be treated as taken into account in
determining a Federal tax liability.
If USP had sold these assets immediately after
the transaction, USP would take into account
any gain or loss recognized on the sale in
determining its Federal tax liability.
$20
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
20
20
21. Distribution of importation property in a loss importation transaction
Example 1 - Liquidations under section 332
Prop. Reg. § 1.334-1
Facts
Analysis
On Date 1, FC distributes A1, A2 and A3
to USP in a complete liquidation that
qualifies under section 332.
1. Determine whether the liquidation of FC is a
"loss importation transaction"
•
•
U.S. Parent
("USP")
100%
Foreign Corporation
("FC")
2.
A1
A2
Basis
$40
$120
$50
$30
A1: $50
A2: $30
A3: $20
$140
Value
Determine USP's basis in property
received
•
•
•
A3
Aggregate basis of importation property: $300
Aggregate value of importation property : $100
•
Because USP's aggregate basis in the
importation properties would be, but
for section 334(b)(1)(B) greater than
the aggregate value, the distribution is
a loss importation transaction.
$20
FC Assets:
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
21
21
22. Distribution of importation property in a loss importation transaction
Example 1A - Liquidations under section 332
Prop. Reg. § 1.334-1
Facts
Analysis
Same as Example 1, except FC is
engaged in a U.S. trade or business and
A3 is used in that U.S trade or business
1.
U.S. Parent
("USP")
2.
100%
Foreign Corporation
("FC")
A1
A2
A3
Basis
$40
$120
$140
Value
$50
$30
$20
FC Assets:
Determine whether A1, A2 or A3 are importation
properties
•
Consider effect to transferor (FC) and
transferee (USP)
•
A3 is not importation property.
•
Only A1 and A2 are importation property.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
Determine whether the liquidation of FC is a "loss
importation transaction"
•
Aggregate basis of importation property: $160
•
Aggregate value of importation property: $80
•
Because USP's aggregate basis in the
importation properties would be, but for
section 334(b)(1)(B) greater than the
aggregate value, the distribution is a
loss importation transaction.
3. Determine USP's basis in property received
•
A1: $50
•
A2: $30
•
A3: $140 (carryover)
22
22
23. ASC 740 quarterly update
Agenda
• Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics
• International taxation
• Hot topics in accounting for taxes
• State and local taxation
• Compensation and benefits update
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
23
24. Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Update
• ASU 2013 –11: Presentation of Unrecognized Tax
Benefit
• Issue 13 – B: Investments in Qualified Affordable
Housing Projects
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
24
25. EITF Issue Accounting Standards Update (ASU 2013-11)
13-C: final consensus
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward or Tax Credit
Carryforward Exists
Issue
Whether an unrecognized tax benefit can be offset against a
deferred tax asset for a net operating loss, similar tax loss,
or tax credit carryforward
Applies to all unrecognized tax benefits existing at
effective date
Addresses diversity in practice
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
25
26. EITF Issue Accounting Standards Update (ASU 2013-11)
13-C: final consensus
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward or Tax Credit
Carryforward Exists
If company has an unrecognized tax benefit and…
Exception – If
carryforwards not available
to settle additional taxes
from disallowance or entity
does not intend to use the
DTA for settlement
Deferred tax assets (NOL
or similar tax loss/credit
carryforwards) for same
jurisdiction with exception
at right…
Then…
Net presentation –
reduce deferred tax
asset
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
Gross presentation –
present a liability for
unrecognized tax
benefit
26
27. EITF Issue Accounting Standards Update (ASU 2013-11)
13-C: final consensus
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward or Tax Credit
Carryforward Exists
ABC Inc. has at the beginning of the year a deferred tax asset of $2.4 million
resulting from a $6 million net operating loss carryforward (tax rate is 40%)—this is
its only deferred tax item. The DTA is offset fully by a valuation allowance. During
the current year, ABC reports taxable income of $3 million on its tax return, which
includes a $2 million deduction that does not meet the recognition criteria of ASC
740. The unrecognized tax position is a permanent item. ABC’s NOL carryforward
is available to settle the additional taxes from disallowance of the uncertain tax
position related to the current year deduction.
Applying the guidance in ASU 2013-11:
ABC would offset the unrecognized tax position of $2 million ($0.8 million tax
affected) against the available NOL of $3 million ($6 million less the tax return
income of $3 million). The balance sheet would reflect a DTA of $0.4 million, net
of any valuation allowance needed.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
27
28. ASU 2013- 11
Effective date and transition
• Public entities: annual periods, and interim periods within
those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2013
• Nonpublic entities: annual periods, and interim periods
within those annual periods, beginning after December
15, 2014
• Prospective application, with option to apply retrospectively
• Early adoption permitted
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
28
28
29. Issue 13-B: consensus-for-exposure
Investments in affordable housing tax credits
Issue
Whether to loosen the restrictions on applying an effective
yield method for Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
investments
• Effective yield method: investor recognizes tax credit net of
the amortization of limited partnership investment as a
component of income taxes attributable to continuing
operations
• Proposed guidance expected to expand availability of the
effective yield method
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
29
29
30. Issue 13-B
Investments in affordable housing tax credits
Old "effective yield" criteria
New "effective yield" criteria
Availability of tax credits is
guaranteed by creditworthy entity
Probable that tax credits will be
available to investor
Projected yield based solely on
cash flows from tax credits is
positive
Projected yield based solely on cash
flows from both tax credits and other
tax benefits is positive
Investor is a limited partner in the
affordable housing project for
legal and tax purposes, and
liability is limited to investment
Investor is a limited liability investor
in the affordable housing project for
legal and tax purposes, and liability
is limited to investment
Investor retains no operational
influence over investment and
substantially all projected benefits
result from tax credits and other tax
benefits
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
30
30
31. ASC 740 quarterly update
Agenda
• Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics
• International taxation
• Hot topics in accounting for taxes
• State and local taxation
• Compensation and benefits update
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
31
32. Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 20013-11
(July 18, 2013)
Guidance on the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit (UTB) when
an NOL or tax credit exists
-
UTB is presented as a reduction to the deferred tax asset (DTA) if the
DTA is available to offset the UTB
- a form of "net" reporting
-
Public entities – tax years beginning after December 15, 2013
-
Nonpublic entities – tax years beginning after December 15, 2014
-
Amendments should be applied to all unrecognized tax benefits that
exist at adoption date
-
Early adoption permitted
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
32
32
33. Pennsylvania Income Tax Legislation
Pennsylvania Tax Reform (H.B. 465)
-
Intangible expense addback
- but do they really mean it?
-
Market-based sourcing of receipts for services
- at long last - some guidance, any guidance
-
Increase in NOL Cap
- but watch the refund claims on this one – What Cap?
-
Franchise Tax "Dead Horse" legislation
– the "halfway there" theorem in operation
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
33
33
34. North Carolina and Massachusetts
Income Tax Legislation
North Carolina Corporate Income Tax Rate reduction (H.B. 998)
-
from 6.9% to 5.0% (and perhaps 3.0%)
Massachusetts adopts market-based sales factor apportionment (H.B.
3535)
-
expansive adoption with some exclusions from the factor
Massachusetts sales/use tax imposed on computer and software services
(H.B. 3535)
-
H.B. 3535 overrode Gov. Patrick's veto
-
Movements afoot to repeal services tax and replace revenues
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
34
34
35. Texas Franchise (Income) Tax Developments
To simplify and improve the administration of the franchise tax (H.B 500)
-
(minor) Rate Reduction and the 0.5% tax rate to select taxpayers
-
$1MM or less Total Revenue - exemption from tax made permanent
-
Pipeline Companies may claim COGS deduction
-
certain Nonadmitted Insurance Organizations exempt from the tax
R&D Franchise Tax Credit/Sales/Use Tax Exemption (H.B. 800)
-
a 5.0% franchise tax credit on R&D activities in Texas - or
-
a sales/use tax exemption for depreciable property used in R&D activities (but
not both in a single year)
But retroactive COGS Rule amendment remains the BIG news for qualified
Taxpayers
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
35
35
36. Alaska and Oregon Tax Developments
Alaska referendum to repeal Oil Production Tax reduction
- ~$1B per year at issue
- Vote Yes! Repeal the Reduction!
- Or – Reducing What We Take is a Giveaway?
Oregon repeals related party addback statute (H.B. 3069)
- and for a very good reason!
- (they didn't really mean it)
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
36
36
37. Other State Tax recent items
MTC Three (3) Factor Elective Apportionment Formula
-
California and Michigan in the judicial lead
In New York (at least) it depends upon how unitary your definition of
"unitary" is
-
Matter of Knowledge Corp.
California Supreme Court – NO Property Tax on Emissions Reduction
Credits
-
Elk Hills Power, LLC
-
overruled appellate court, trial court and SBE
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
37
37
38. Year-end State Income Tax Accounting
considerations
Effective Tax Rate (ETR)
-
Changes in laws, regulations, court decisions
-
Mergers and divestitures
-
Changes in apportionment patterns
- reconsider market-based sourcing applications
-
Nexus
-
Combined unitary filings
-
State income tax treatment and reporting of pass-through entities
-
State taxation (or not) of foreign operations
-
Adjustments to tax expense outside the ETR
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
38
38
39. Year-end State Income Tax Accounting
considerations
ASC 740-10 (fka FIN 48)
-
Update SOL status
- know the effects of the federal SOL
-
Take another look at issues and governing authorities
- consider acquisitions and divestitures
-
Update interest and penalty computations
-
Consider federal adjustments
- State computations should parallel federal ASC 740-10
-
Current and deferred treatment of UTPs should be consistent
-
Consider ASC 450 (fka FAS 5), including disclosures
- E.g., bulk sale sales/use tax liabilities/acquired liabilities
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
39
39
40. Year-end State Income Tax Accounting
considerations
-
Account reconciliations
-
Tax assets (e.g., NOLs) and related valuation allowances
- State adoption (or not) of IRC Sec. 382 limitations
-
Estimated payments
-
Review FIT provision
-
Intercompany agreements and transactions
-
Credits and Incentives
-
File these in the Better Early than Late or Never cabinet
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
40
40
41. ASC 740 quarterly update
Agenda
• Federal Legislative Updates and Related Tax
Accounting Topics
• International taxation
• Hot topics in accounting for taxes
• State and local taxation
• Compensation and benefits
update
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
41
42. Special considerations in computing the APIC
pool: Reorganizations
• Most reorganization transactions have implications for excess tax
benefits held in APIC pool
• But first, what are excess tax benefits?
– Increments to the APIC pool created when equity compensation
deductions exceed related deferred tax asset
– Used to offset tax benefit shortfalls (where tax deduction is less than
related deferred tax asset)
• APIC pool tracks net excess benefits and shortfalls
• If insufficient balance in APIC pool to offset a shortfall, it's
recognized as increased tax expense on income statement
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
42
42
43. Special considerations in computing the APIC
pool: Reorganizations
• Most reorganization transactions have implications for excess tax
benefits held in APIC pool:
– Pooling: Accounting method that allows the balance sheets of two
companies to be added together pursuant to an acquisition or
merger
– Purchase Accounting: The alternative accounting method, whereby
the purchasing company adds the absorbed company's assets to its
own balance sheet
– Sale of a subsidiary: Excess tax benefit pool stays with the parent if
the excess tax benefit was from an award of the parent’s equity; it
follows the subsidiary if it was related to an award related to the
subsidiary’s equity
– Spin-offs: Currently conflicting views: either follow the subsidiary
sale view above, or the pool follows the employee
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
43
43
44. Special considerations in computing the APIC
pool: Reorganizations
• Poolings
– No change in basis, and include all pooled companies' excess tax
benefits
• Purchase Accounting
– Under this method new basis is recognized and excess tax benefits
of target do not carry over to purchaser
– Excess tax benefits from awards issued in the acquisition (new
awards or substitutions for target equity compensation grant) are
recognized by purchaser
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
44
44
45. Special considerations in computing the APIC
pool: Reorganizations
• Sale of a subsidiary
– Excess tax benefit pool stays with the parent if the excess tax benefit
was from an award of the parent’s equity
– Follows the subsidiary if it was related to an award related to the
subsidiary’s equity
• Spin-offs — Currently conflicting views, probably can account under
either of two ways:
– Follow subsidiary sale method above, or
– Pool follows the employee (i.e., belongs to entity for whom services
were performed)
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
45
45
46. Special considerations in computing the APIC
pool: Reorganizations
• Special note: Bankruptcy accounting:
– Company generally applies fresh-start accounting upon emerging
from bankruptcy (ASC 852-10)
– Fresh-start accounting creates new basis similar to purchase
accounting
– Therefore apply purchase accounting approach and excess tax
benefits do not remain with company upon emerging from
bankruptcy
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
46
46
48. Do you have any immediate concerns regarding
ASC 740 matters?
A member of Grant Thornton’s Tax Accounting and
Risk Advisory team would be happy to speak with
you regarding your specific situation.
Please provide your name, phone number and email in the
form on the next screen and we will be in touch. Only Grant
Thornton will have the ability to see this information.
Alternatively, please contact any of today's presenters directly.
Their contact details are provided on the next slides.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
49. Contact
Information
Randy Robason
Chuck Evans
National Partner-inCharge, TARAS
Partner,
Accounting Principles
Randy.Robason@us.gt.com
Charles.Evans@us.gt.com
Joe Calianno
Mark Ritter
Partner,
International Tax
Consulting
Managing Director,
Compensation and
Benefits Consulting
Joe.Calianno@us.gt.com
Mark.Ritter@us.gt.com
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
51. Disclaimer
**********************
IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this PowerPoint is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
used, for the purpose of (a) avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code
or (b) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or
matter addressed herein.
**********************
The foregoing slides and any materials accompanying them are educational materials prepared by Grant Thornton LLP and are not
intended as advice directed at any particular party or to a client-specific fact pattern. The information contained in this presentation
provides background information about certain legal and accounting issues and should not be regarded as rendering legal or
accounting advice to any person or entity. As such, the information is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client
relationship or accountant-client relationship with you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information so
provided. In addition, the information contained in this presentation is not specific to any particular case or situation and may not
reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements.
You may contact us or an independent tax advisor to discuss the potential application of these issues to your particular situation. In
the event that you have questions about and want to seek legal or professional advice concerning your particular situation in light of
the matters discussed in the presentation, please contact us so that we can discuss the necessary steps to form a professional-client
relationship if that is warranted. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax
treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.
© 2013 Grant Thornton LLP, the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. This
material is the work of Grant Thornton LLP, the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International, Ltd.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.
52. Thank you for viewing
this presentation.
Receive invitations to
future webcasts…
www.grantthornton.com/subscribe
Select Tax Hot Topics
www.GrantThornton.com | twitter.com/GrantThorntonUS | linkd.in/GrantThorntonUS
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.