Patents or open source, are patents good for us?
•Descargar como PPTX, PDF•
1 recomendación•529 vistas
This presentation was given on May 21, 2015 at the TKKR lab Enschede.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
Similar a Patents or open source, are patents good for us?
Similar a Patents or open source, are patents good for us? (20)
Más de Hendrik de Lange
Último
Último (20)
Patents or open source, are patents good for us?
- 2. Think!
- 3. Patent
- 5. On any inventions, in all fields of technology that are new, inventive and industrially applicable
- 6. New: never disclosed anywhere in the world
- 8. Industrial applicable: can be made or used in any kind of industry, including agriculture
- 9. Excluded as invention: a) discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; b) aesthetic creations; c) schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers; d) presentation of information.
- 10. Exceptions to patentability a) Inventions contrary to “ordre public” or morality b) plant or animal varieties; c) Methods for the treatment of the human or animal by surgery or therapy and diagnostic methods practised on the human or animal body.
- 16. Small innovators are forced out off the market
- 17. Big tech misuses patents to kill small tech
- 20. Patents are on the expense of consumer
- 23. 1931
- 25. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 USA television sets
- 26. 1781
- 27. 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 Steam engines in the USA and S-curve fit
- 29. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Globally installed capacity of photovoltaic cells [GWp]
- 30. Last 10 Years, some 5000 patents have been filed on solar cells
- 31. 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 Predicted global electrical power consumption and the installed PV capacity 3,3% Global Electricity consumption [GW] PV production [GW 2024
- 32. Patents do not hinder innovation
- 34. 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 GDP/capY2005ppp$ Granted patents USA Patents versus wealth 1800 2014 Source: www.gapminder.org
- 35. 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 GDP/capY2005ppp$ Granted pantents NL Patents versus wealth 2014 1800 Source: www.gapminder.org
- 36. A positive correlation exists between wealth and patents numbers
- 37. 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 1855 1865 1875 1885 1895 1905 1915 1925 2005US$GDP/cap Year GDP/cap in 2005 US$ PPP Belgium The Netherlands Germany Source: www.gapminder.org Patent free era in NL
- 38. In the Dutch patent free era, the Netherlands became from leading in wealth to lagging in wealth, compared to its neighbors whilst they maintained their patent systems
- 39. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1500 1600 1700 1800 NL patents per decade Zaagmolen 1593
- 40. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1500 1600 1700 1800 NL patents per decade Indexed purchasing power soap Source: The prices of the most important consumer goods, and indices of wages and the cost of living in the western part of the Netherlands, 1450-1800, J. Luiten van Zanden
- 41. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1500 1600 1700 1800 NL patents per decade Indexed purchasing power peat Source: The prices of the most important consumer goods, and indices of wages and the cost of living in the western part of the Netherlands, 1450-1800, J. Luiten van Zanden
- 42. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1500 1600 1700 1800 NL patents per decade Indexed purchasing power pepper Source: The prices of the most important consumer goods, and indices of wages and the cost of living in the western part of the Netherlands, 1450-1800, J. Luiten van Zanden
- 43. The absence of patents appear to destroy wealth
- 44. Are small innovators forced out off the market?
- 46. No
- 50. 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
- 51. By using patents, small innovators can survive, sometimes with a legal fight.
- 52. Does big tech misuse patents to kill small tech?
- 54. With the aid of a patent troll, the inventor could reclaim his IP and sell it for a decent price.
- 56. People pay 6-10 €ct more, for less beschuit
- 57. Because of his patent, the inventor could raise license fees
- 59. Big tech patents are 150 times more valuable than small tech patents
- 60. In EU, non uses clauses prevents abuse, in USA there is no such relief system
- 61. Non usus: if you don’t practise the invention within 3 years after grant, you cant stop others anymore, a license is obligatory by law (Article 57(2) ROW)
- 62. NPE’s sitting on their rights doing nothing are not possible in EU, contrary thereto, in the USA they can (and do sometimes)
- 64. In the Netherlands they are (since 1995)
- 65. 66% of USA applications gets granted
- 66. 50% of EPO applications gets granted
- 67. Patents are not granted for anything
- 69. SEP’s are pooled, licenses are given out under FRAND conditions
- 71. SISVEL HOLDS POOLS ON a.o.: LTE, LTE-A, Wi-Fi, Wireless, MPEG-a, DVB-T, DVB- T2, WSS, DECT, DSL, 802.11 n, 802.11 ac (WLAN MIMO)
- 72. Licenses are given out at fixed prices per device in contingents
- 73. IP holders are a.o. Phillips, Samsung, Nokia, KPN, TDF, Orange
- 75. Paying license fees avoids problems
- 76. patents can suffocate competition if infringed without paid license fees
- 77. Are patents on the expense of consumer?
- 79. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Price of Si PV cell in $/Wp 0 1 2 3 4 5 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 36$ct 80$
- 81. Patents are on the expense of the consumer, if he chooses to buy the underlying technology
- 83. Is at the choice of the innovator
- 84. Discarding the entire patent system, is a bad idea, for all of us