Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Qep Report on site visit November 8, 2011
1. ON-SITE VISIT NOVEMBER 8, 2011
Revised Text: April 5, 2012
Developed by Houston Community College in preparation for
reaffirmation of accreditation by the Commission of Colleges of the
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
3. Houston Community College
There are many people at Houston Community College who contributed to the writing of this QEP
.
Their contributions were invaluable and greatly appreciated.
Alan Ainsworth
Saler Axel
Tineke Berends
G. Raymond Brown
Judy Cantwell
Charles Cook
David Diehl
Lorah Gough
Stephen Levey
Martha Oburn
Jennifer O’Neil
Angela Secrest
3
5. Houston Community College
Table of Contents
1 Executive Summary....................................................................................1
2 Background.................................................................................................3
2.1 Our College District..................................................................................3
2.2 Our City....................................................................................................3
2.3 Our Students............................................................................................4
2.4 Our Faculty...............................................................................................5
3 Process and Selection.................................................................................7
3.1 Development and Selection of the QEP Topic.........................................7
3.2 Rationale for Selecting HCC INSPIRE: Answering Critical Needs.........13
3.3 Developing the QEP and Narrowing the Focus.......................................19
4 Review of Literature and Best Practices...................................................21
4.1 Literature Review...................................................................................21
4.2 Review of Best Practices and Suggestions for Implementation ............26
5 HCC INSPIRE Goals, Activities, and Student Learning Outcomes...........31
5.1 Goal 1: Ensure Science Course Readiness..........................................32
5.2 Goal 2: Institutionalize Real-World, Active and
Collaborative Learning in Science Courses.................................................34
5.3 Goal 3: Improved Science Student Engagement...................................46
6 QEP Implementation Timeline...................................................................47
7 Organizational Structure and Resources..................................................53
7.1 Institutional Structure and Organization.................................................53
7.2 Budget....................................................................................................59
8 Assessment of HCC INSPIRE...................................................................63
8.1 Outcome and Process Assessment Strategies......................................63
8.2 QEP Goal Assessments.........................................................................64
9 Appendices................................................................................................67
9.1 HCC INSPIRE Summary Chart..............................................................69
9.2 Definitions...............................................................................................70
9.3 Implementation and Assessment Plan...................................................73
9.4 Bibliography............................................................................................99
5
7. Houston Community College
1 Executive Summary
In recognition of its essential role in providing relevant learning opportunities to the students of a large
and diverse community for academic and career advancement, Houston Community College (HCC) has
developed a comprehensive Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) with a clear focus on improving student
learning, engagement, and success in the sciences.
While the US is currently the world’s leader in science and technology, numerous factors indicate a “gathering
storm” by which US leadership is presently challenged. There are few fields of study more important than
science for our social and economic security. As the current “energy capital” of the world and home to the
famed Texas Medical Center, Houston must provide thousands of workers annually dedicated to scientific
research, training, and work.
HCC’s QEP, HCC INSPIRE (Innovative Science-Program Initiatives to Reform Education) will transform the
HCC science student experience by providing real-world, active and collaborative learning opportunities.
Such learning has been shown to improve student engagement, knowledge and persistence, as well as
encourage critical thinking and higher-level reasoning. Further, such learning will contribute to 21st century
learning skills for students as adaptability, teamwork, effective use of technology, and social and personal
responsibility.
HCC INSPIRE will bring together science faculty to create and assess a series of course-specific active
learning modules with student-engaging, real-world themes. Faculty development teams in biology, chemistry,
and physics will work with instructional designers to create the modules and college teams will pilot, assess,
and scale-up implementation. The modules will be delivered in Eagle Online, the HCC learning management
system, and supplemented by a collection of online learning materials in the HCC Library for faculty and
student support. The HCC Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence will coordinate appropriate faculty
development experiences with college Curriculum Innovation Centers. Faculty will implement a sciencebased student success course at all HCC colleges to improve science student learning and success. Faculty
will also sponsor science clubs to promote student engagement. The HCC Office of Institutional Research
will assess student learning outcomes (SLOs) as well as program goals and objectives.
HCC INSPIRE will be led by Dr. A. Tineke Berends, HCC Northwest Biology Professor, who may be contacted
at tineke.berends@hccs.edu .
She will be supported by the Vice Chancellor for Instruction Charles Cook (charles.cook@hccs.edu) and
the Accreditation Compliance Director Judy Cantwell (judy.cantwell@hccs.edu).
1
8.
9. Houston Community College
2 Background – Our College, City, Students, and Faculty
2.1 Our College District
Houston Community College (HCC) is a two-year, open admission, public institution of higher education
offering high-quality, affordable education to prepare individuals for life and work in a global and technological
society. As a singularly accredited institution comprised of six colleges, HCC offers associate degrees (AA,
AS, AAT) that transfer to four-year colleges and universities across the state and nation, and associate
degrees (AAS), certificate programs, and continuing education in more than 70 fields of work. HCC has
the largest adult basic education and English-as-a-second language programs, transfers more graduates
to the university of their choice, and places more students in career employment than any other community
college in Texas.
Since its opening in 1971, HCC has grown into one of the largest community colleges in the nation with over
74,000 students enrolled each semester. More than 1.8 million students have improved their lives through
education and training obtained from HCC. Community College Week recently ranked HCC first in Texas
and fifth in the nation for associate degrees conferred in 2010-2011.
HCC’s Board of Trustees, HCC’s official governing body, is composed of nine members who are elected from
single-member districts across a taxing district that includes the Houston, Alief, North Forest, and Stafford
school districts and the city of Missouri City. The broader service area for HCC includes the Spring Branch,
Katy, and parts of the Fort Bend school districts. Administrative leadership is provided by a chancellor,
who is the chief executive officer, a deputy chancellor/COO, vice chancellors for district-wide administrative
areas, and presidents for regional colleges (Central, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, and Southwest) and
the specialized Coleman College for Health Sciences in the Texas Medical Center.
Under the leadership of the HCC board and administration, the district has made significant investments
in facilities, technology, and operational efficiencies that have prepared HCC for the future. HCC’s service
area covers over 600 square miles of Houston and consists of 22 campuses or centers. This structure is
conducive to providing a wide variety of academic and workforce offerings over a very large geographic
area and to serving a diverse community.
2.2 Our City
HCC serves the greater Houston area, the nation’s fourth largest city and its growing business economy
provides limitless career opportunities for HCC students. The Greater Houston Partnership has identified the
following key industries that drive our region and are poised for further growth, innovation, and excellence:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Advanced Manufacturing
Aerospace/Aviation
Biotechnology/Life Sciences/Medical
Distribution/Logistics
Energy, Petrochemicals, and Alternative Energies
Information Technology
Nanotechnology
The Houston region offers a strong infrastructure to support these industries. Geographically centered
between the East and West coasts of the nation, Houston hosts an exceptional airline system, deep sea
port and intra-coastal waterway, multiple major railroads and intermodal facilities, and a world-class highway
system. Houston is also home to the Texas Medical Center with the world’s largest concentration of expertise
in medical treatment and care, medical research and medical technology. Houston is second only to New
York City in the number of Fortune 500 and Forbes 2000 company headquarters.
3
10. Houston Community College
The need for a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)-trained workforce in Houston
is enormous and expected to continue to grow as the area attracts more STEM-related research and
technology corporations. Current STEM fields will add an estimated 72,510 jobs to the Houston area by
2018. BioHouston reports that emerging technologies will add an additional
Annise Parker, Mayor of the
average of 37,517 jobs per year in the greater Houston metropolitan area over
City of Houston: “HCC’s bold
that timeline.
vision to provide the
Houston prizes its racial and ethnic diversity as a source of strength in a global
economy and is becoming ever more diverse. The 2000 census found that no
racial or ethnic group constitutes a majority of the population, with approximately
42 percent white, 18 percent African-American, 32 percent Hispanic, and 5
percent Asian. By 2030, Hispanics will likely become the majority and Asians
will climb to 10 percent of the total.
educational needs of our
region will enable us to meet
the challenges
of the changing global
marketplace.”
Further, over one-fifth of Houstonians were born outside the United States. In many ways, Houston is truly an
international city, hosting 83 consulates, 21 foreign banks, over 560 foreign-owned firms, and a population
speaking over 90 languages. More than 600 Houston-area companies have offices in 129 different countries,
while over 3,500 Houston companies are engaged in international business.
The Houston Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) contains 66 school districts, 50 charter schools, and
a wide range of private and parochial schools. More than a dozen community colleges and 17 colleges
and universities educate well over 320,000 Houston area students each year. In spite of its size, Houston
provides a broad range of cost-competitive housing options; in fact Houston’s housing costs are the lowest
among the 27 metro areas in the US with more than 2 million residents.
2.3 Our Students
As an African American, Hispanic, and Asian American serving institution, HCC has a very diverse student
population with the largest number of international students of any community college in the nation. Partly
due to a traditional policy of open access and relatively low tuition rates, HCC, as most community colleges,
enrolls larger percentages of nontraditional, low-income, and minority students than four-year colleges and
universities.
Other 3%
HCC Student Demographics—Fall 2010
In Fall 2010, 83 percent of HCC students enrolled in semester
credit hour courses leading to certificates and/or degrees, nine
percent enrolled in Continuing Education Unit (CEU) courses,
one percent enrolled in non-credit courses, and seven percent
enrolled in Adult Literacy courses.
HCC students attend primarily part-time (69 percent), while only
31 percent attend full–time. HCC students primarily take day
time classes (59 percent), with 20 percent taking evening and
21 percent taking week-end or other classes.
4
Asian 14%
White 18%
Hispanic
Hispanic 34%
AA
White
Asain
other
African American 31%
Source: 2010 HCC Fact Book
11. Houston Community College
In 2009-10, HCC awarded a total of 4,946 total degrees and certificates. Other awards included 2,204
students completing the core curriculum and 1,049 students completing marketable skills achiever awards.
HCC enrolls over 7,000 students each semester in dual credit courses and operates five Early College High
Schools (ECHS) on its campuses, all named “exemplary” by the Texas Education Agency. HCC provides
students with entrée to excellent workforce opportunities and articulation agreements with colleges and
universities across the state and nation provide students with access to outstanding baccalaureate programs.
HCC created an Honors College in 2006 to attract academically talented students and provide them a costfree opportunity to study together in a cohort/learning community, develop leadership skills, increase their
global perspective through study/travel abroad, and prepare them for scholarship opportunities to prestigious
universities around the country. Our goal is to recruit a diverse, multicultural student cohort that would not
otherwise have the chance to study with outstanding professors, take advantage of numerous service and
leadership opportunities, and study/travel abroad.
HCC students qualify for the Omega Sigma Chapter, one of the largest in the nation, of the Phi Theta
Kappa honor society. The chapter and its members have won numerous state and national awards. Most
recently, HCC student and PTK member Curtwin Bismark, won both a Jack Kent Cooke Foundation transfer
scholarship and a Newman Civic Fellow Award from Campus Compact.
2.4. Our Faculty
The faculty members of HCC comprise a large and talented group of diverse individuals. During the 20102011 academic year HCC employed 910 full-time faculty members and 2,921adjunct faculty members.
Of the total group, 23 percent hold doctorate degrees and 60 percent hold master’s degrees and above.
Slightly over half (52 percent) of the faculty are female, and the ethnic breakdown includes 57 percent white,
24 percent African-American, 11 percent Hispanic, 8 percent Asian-American, and less than one percent
American Indian.
HCC faculty earned their credentials from prestigious universities across the nation and world, have won
numerous awards and honors, including Fulbright Scholarships, appointments to prestigious national and
state committees, and teaching exchanges with institutions around the globe. They have published scholarly
books and articles, presented at professional conferences, composed operas and other musical pieces,
and developed state-of-the-art curricula. HCC faculty currently write over $20 million of successful grant
proposals each year, bringing funds to the college from the National Science Foundation, the US Departments
of Agriculture, Energy, Education, and Labor, and numerous other sources.
5
12.
13. Houston Community College
3.0 HCC INSPIRE – Process and Selection
3.1 Development and Selection of the QEP Topic
The HCC QEP topic is HCC INSPIRE (Innovative Science Program Initiatives to Reform Education). The
topic was selected not only for its focus on student-centered learning, but also for its potential for districtwide, interdisciplinary participation by faculty and meaningful, scalable institutional reform. The process
that was used to select the topic spanned two years and included broad and diverse participation by HCC
students, faculty, staff, administration, community members, and Board of Trustee members. The topic
chosen answers critical needs for our nation and state and is one that HCC is in an excellent position to
pursue in terms of our setting, our infrastructure, and our track record for instructional innovation. The chart
below summarizes some of the major steps during the selection process that are detailed in the following
narrative.
7
14. Houston Community College
In Spring 2009, SACS Liaison and Vice Chancellor for Instruction Charles Cook created a new job description
for a “SACS Director for HCC,” an individual who would lead the efforts to compile the Compliance Report,
Focused Report, and Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) for HCC during its efforts for reaffirmation of
accreditation in 2012. During the Summer 2009, the job was posted and interviews were conducted. Judy
Cantwell, HCC-SE College Library Chair, was selected as the HCC SACS Director. During Fall 2011,
Director Cantwell and Dr. Cook worked with HCC Chancellor Mary Spangler to organize the HCC Steering
Committee for Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
To add to HCC senior administrators (Presidents and Vice Chancellors) and the current and incoming
Faculty Senate Presidents, Director Cantwell posted a call for volunteers and nominations by faculty and
staff to serve on the Steering Committee as well as a host of sub-committees that would examine Board
Governance and Institutional Mission, Strategic Planning and Institutional Effectiveness, Instruction, Student
Services, Institutional Resources, Administration, and Development of a QEP.
HCC Steering Committee for Reaffirmation of SACS Accreditation
Name
Location
Charles Cook (co-chair)
Judy Cantwell (co-chair)
Gisela (Bennie) Ables
District
District
Northwest College
Alan Ainsworth
Central College
Dan Arguijo
Jonathan Brook
District
Northeast College
Renee Byas
Bill Carter
District
District
Linda Comte
Northeast College
David Cross
District
Margaret Ford-Fisher
Northeast College
8
Title
Vice-Chancellor of Instruction
SACS Director
Department Chair
President of HCC Faculty Senate
(2009-2010)
Department Chair
President of HCC Faculty Senate
(2010-2011)
Chief Communications Officer
Associate Department Chair
Co-Chair Programs Committee
General Counsel
Vice-Chancellor for Information
Technology
Instructional Design Coordinator
Co-Chair Institutional Mission
Governance & Effectiveness
Committee
EEO/Compliance Director
Co-Chair Library/Student
Services Committee
President
Co-Chair Institutional Mission
Governance & Effectiveness
Committee
15. Houston Community College
Name
Location
Fena Garza
Southwest College
Lollie Green
Northeast College
Bill Harmon
Central College
Butch Herod
Northwest College
Zach Hodges
Northwest College
Dennis Klappersack
Southwest College
Stephen Levey
District
Martha Oburn
District
Diana Pino
District
Irene Porcarello
Southeast College
Angela Secrest
District
Dan Seymour
District
Mary Spangler
Art Tyler
Thomas Urban
District
District
Northwest College
Willie Williams
Betty Young
District
Coleman College
9
Title
President
Co-Chair QEP Development
Committee
Associate Dean of Student
Development
Co-Chair Institutional Mission
Governance & Effectiveness
Committee
President
Co-Chair Physical & Financial
Resources Committee
Executive Dean for Academic &
Student Services
Co-Chair QEP Development
Committee
President
Co-Chair Faculty Committee
Library Department Chair
Co-Chair Physical & Financial
Resources Committee
Assoc. Vice-Chancellor for
Academic Instruction
Executive Director of Institutional
Research
Vice-Chancellor of Student
Success
President
Co-Chair Programs Committee
Director Library/LRC Support
Services
Vice-Chancellor of Institutional
Planning & Effectiveness
Chancellor
COO/Deputy Chancellor
Faculty Philosophy
President of HCC Faculty Senate
2011-2012
Chief Human Resources Officer
President
Co-Chair Library/Student Service
Committee
16. Houston Community College
Director Cantwell and Dr. Cook presented “The Road to SACS Reaffirmation for HCC” to the Board of
Trustees in October, 2009, explaining the processes, timelines, reports, and roles and responsibilities for
all HCC constituent groups.
The Steering Committee and sub-committee members were selected and the initial kick-off meetings were
held in December 2009, including that of the QEP Development Committee, co-chaired by Dr. Fena Garza,
President of HCC-Southwest College and Dr. Butch Herod, Executive Dean of HCC-Northwest College. The
QEP Development Committee started the Spring 2010 semester by posting a QEP Suggestion Box on the
HCC web site, explaining to HCC students, faculty, and staff, the purpose of a Quality Enhancement Plan,
offering example topics, and inviting them to submit topic suggestions.
HCC QEP Development Committee
Name
Location
Butch Herod (co-chair)
Northwest
Fena Garza (co-chair)
Alan Ainsworth
Southwest
Central
Jennifer Ankenbauer
District
Laura Arzola
John Boxie
Tenecia Brown
Willie Caldwell
Southeast
District
District
Southwest
Bindu Chakravarty
David Diehl
Northeast
District
Vivian Ellis
Arnold Goldberg
Janis Innis
David Joost
Southwest
Southwest
Southwest
District
Steve Levey
District
Evelyn McClain
Mike McCormick
Cheryl Peters
District
Southwest
Central
James Smith
Northeast
Title
Executive Dean Academic
& Student Services
President
Faculty English Division Chair
Faculty Senate President
2010-2011
Faculty Alternative Certification
Program
Faculty Development Studies
Lieutenant, Police Department
Web Content Specialist
Faculty Department Chair Business
Technology
Faculty Chemistry
Director Teaching & Learning
Excellence
Pt Counselor
Dean Workforce Development
Faculty Developmental English
Director Adult Educational
Programs
A s s o c ia t e V ic e C h a n c e l l o r
Academic Instruction
Training Specialist
Faculty Department Chair History
Executive Dean Instruction
& Student Services
Public Services Librarian
10
17. Houston Community College
All HCC leadership groups, including the Chancellor’s Strategic and Operational Teams, the Deans’ Councils,
and the Faculty Senate were encouraged to have QEP discussions during the semester. HCC workforce
programs engaged the members of their advisory committees in discussions about the QEP. During the
May 2010 HCC graduation, each graduating student was asked to fill out a card answering the question:
“What one thing would you suggest to improve HCC?”
In Fall 2010, all of the HCC Colleges held QEP Forums for students, faculty, and staff participation, with
the first held by HCC-Coleman College for the Health Sciences on September 7, 2010. HCC engaged
students with focus group discussions on the QEP at meetings of the Phi Theta Kappa honors society and
the United Student Council. By the end of the semester, the HCC suggestion box and the various forums
and meetings had generated over 400 potential topics. The QEP Development Committee narrowed these
topics down to five general categories.
During the Spring 2011 semester, Director Cantwell and Dr. Cook issued a Request for Applications (RFA),
inviting HCC faculty to apply for a stipend to write a QEP “white paper” on one of the five general topics,
briefly explaining their background/experience, why they felt the topic should be selected, and what they
proposed as the most needed actions to achieve the goal of their intended topic. The RFA offered the
following further detail on the following general topics.
1. Improved Teaching and Student Learning in our Certificate and Degree Programs
This topic would address HCC efforts to ensure that students are learning what they need for completion
of their programs and successful performance at the next level. Examples include but are not limited to
the following: Innovative and effective teaching strategies (e.g. Model Course Development, Learning
Communities, etc.) and Active/Collaborative Learning (e.g., Service learning, Project based learning, etc.)
2. Improved Critical Thinking
This topic would address the enhancement of critical thinking skills across the curriculum. Examples include
but are not limited to the following: critical analysis, media literacy and information literacy.
3. Improved Teaching and Student Learning in Developmental Education and ESL at HCC
This topic would address enhancement/development of strategies that address developmental education,
focusing on one or more of its component parts: developmental reading, developmental writing, developmental
math, or English as a Second Language.
4. Improved Pathways/Interventions Leading to Higher Completion Rates for HCC Students
This topic would address means by which HCC might improve retention and persistence of students and
increase their momentum toward completion of their goals – certificates, degrees, transfer, job placement, etc.
It could include improvements in our outreach efforts, advising, orientation, mentoring, tutoring, assessment,
tracking, soft skills, etc.
5. Use of Technology for Improved Student Learning
This topic would address how HCC uses the Internet and other means of technology (iPads, computer
notebooks, Kindles, Nooks, etc.) to improve teaching and learning. It could also include how HCC might
enable students to become more literate and faculty to become more adept in utilizing ever-increasing waves
of information, including “open source” learning materials.
11
18. Houston Community College
A committee composed of Director Cantwell, Dr. Cook, Dr. Steve Levey (Associate Vice Chancellor for
Academic Instruction), Dr. Martha Oburn (Executive Director of Institutional Research), Dr. David Diehl,
Director of the HCC Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence, Dr. Alan Ainsworth (President of the
HCC Faculty Senate), Faculty Senate appointee Professors Ruth Dunn and Pamela Norwood, and the
Co-Chairs of the QEP Development Committee, Dr. Garza and Dr. Herod, selected seven faculty to write
white papers, with at least one paper in each of the five categories above. The same committee ultimately
read and judged the papers utilizing a rubric created by HCC Faculty Senate President Alan Ainsworth,
and selected one submitted by Dr. A Tineke Berends, HCC-Biology Professor at HCC-Northwest College
that included elements of active and collaborative learning, technology as a teaching tool, and “real world”
content to improve teaching and student learning in the sciences.
During the Spring semester 2011, Dr. Berends refined her topic as HCC INSPIRE: Innovative Science
Program Initiatives to Reform Education and HCC named Dr. Berends as the QEP Director. Dr. Berends
presented the topic to an HCC Faculty Roundtable to elicit feedback. She presented an overview of her
topic in the first HCC QEP Newsletter to inform HCC students, faculty, and staff and delivered a PowerPoint
presentation on the topic to the HCC Board of Trustees in May 2011.
QEP Steering Committee
Name
Title
Tineke Berends
Juan Carlos Reina
Bart Sheinberg
Martha Oburn
David Diehl
Angela Secrest
Nazanin Hebel
Steve Dessens
Kumela Tafa
Mahtash Moussavi
Beverly Perry
Zachary Hodges
Betty Fortune
Charles Cook
Judy Cantwell
QEP Director (faculty)
Director,Academic Resource Development
Program Director, West Houston Center for Science
Executive Director, Office of Institutional Research
Director, Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence
Director, HCC Libraries
Program Coordinator—Biology (faculty)
Program Coordinator—Chemistry (faculty)
Program Coordinator—Physics (faculty)
College Department Chair – SE (faculty)
College Department Chair – NE (faculty)
Northeast College President
Southwest College Dean
Vice-Chancellor for Instruction
Director, Accreditation Compliance
12
19. Houston Community College
Further actions to develop and refine the QEP topic during the Spring and Summer of 2011 included the
following:
• District-wide survey of science faculty needs for development and implementation of the QEP
• District-wide survey of science students to validate need for real world, active and collaborative learning strategies
• District-wide roundtable discussion to narrow focus of QEP
• Formation of QEP research and writing teams
• Writing and editing of QEP paper
On August 24, 2011, at the start of the Fall 2011 semester, Dr. Berends made a PowerPoint presentation to
HCC Instructional Leaders (Presidents, Deans, Program Coordinators, Department/Division Chairs) A video
of Dr. Berends’s presentation may be accessed at: http://itunes.hccs.edu/HCCS_SACS_QEP_2011.mov.
3.2 Rationale for selecting HCC INSPIRE: Answering Critical Needs
3.2.1 External Factors
The state of education in science, and more broadly, that of the STEM fields (Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics), has been a major concern in the United States for over two decades with
many observers questioning “Are We Losing Our Edge?” (Michael D. Lemonick, Time Magazine, Feb
5, 2006) as the world’s leader in science and technology. In a 2005 best seller, Thomas Friedman argues
that “The World is Flat” as new technologies have enabled the ambitious everywhere to compete successfully
across borders. With large populations earning lower salaries and governments seemingly focused more
intently on educational and economic advancements, countries as China, India, South Korea and Singapore
are outpacing the U.S. on a varied set of indicators. What is even more unsettling to many Americans is that
the advance of other countries is occurring as the progress of the United States seems to be stagnating or
even slipping.
Whereas the United States is currently the world’s leader in science and technology and the number of
jobs in these fields is expected to grow much faster than those in other fields, America’s leadership faces
major challenges. The technology workforce has traditionally consisted of white males and was regularly
supplemented with scholars and scientists from around the world seeking to study and work in the U.S. Yet,
the traditional workforce is aging, and the white male population demographic is being outpaced by minority
populations, who in addition to females, are often less successfully recruited and prepared for careers in
the STEM fields. Further, as opportunities are growing abroad, international students and workers are less
likely to study and work in the U.S.
13
20. Houston Community College
In 2005, the National Academies issued a report entitled Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing
and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, detailing problems and offering several specific
recommendations for actions. Five years later in 2010, the same report was “revisited” and the same
problems were noted and a subtitle was added that the gathering storm is “now approaching Category 5.”
Listing just a few facts to illustrate the point, the report notes the following economic realities:
• In 2009, 51 percent of United States patents were awarded to non-United States companies.
• There are sixteen energy companies in the world with larger reserves than the largest United States company.
There are 60 new nuclear power plants currently being built in the world. Only one of these is in the United
States.
• Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. (computer manufacturing) employs more people than the worldwide employment
of Apple, Dell, Microsoft, Intel and Sony combined.
• United States consumers spend significantly more on potato chips than the government devotes to energy
research and development. All the National Academies Gathering Storm committee’s recommenda¬tions could
have been fully implemented with the sum America spends on cigarettes each year—with $60 billion left over.
The Gathering Storm Revisited report (2010) also contains the following educational and quality of life
indicators:
• About 30 percent of U.S. high school math students and 60 percent of those enrolled in physical sciences
have teachers who either did not major in the subject or are not certified to teach it. The situation is worse
for low-income students.
• The United States ranks 27th among developed nations in the propor¬tion of college students receiving
undergraduate degrees in science or engineering. The United States graduates more visual arts and performing
arts majors than engineers.
• According to the ACT College Readiness report, 78 percent of high school graduates did not meet the readiness
benchmark levels for one or more entry-level college courses in mathematics, science, reading and English.
• The World Economic Forum ranks the United States 48th in quality of mathematics and science education.
The federal and state governments as well as corporate entities have responded to the crisis with numerous
initiatives to expand research and innovation and improve the teaching of math and science in American
schools and colleges. In 2009 the Obama Administration announced its Educate to Innovate Initiative
and public-private partnerships have been announced by companies such as Time Warner, Discovery
Communications, Exxon-Mobil, Intel, Xerox, and others. In 2011, the Texas Guaranteed Student Loan
Corporation donated $25 million to the Texas-STEM Challenge Scholarship to provide competitive awards
to regional partnerships between community and technical colleges and local employers to help attract,
retain and graduate STEM students.
14
21. Houston Community College
The Growing STEM Education Challenge for Community Colleges
While our national need for scientific literacy and high-quality STEM graduates continues to grow, resources
continue to shrink. Not surprisingly, enrollment at community colleges is up (Pew 2009, U.S. Department of
Education 2009). Community colleges tend to be relatively diverse, enrolling greater percentages of underrepresented minority students (Pew 2010). Clearly, community colleges will need to carry an ever-larger
share of the national responsibility to produce the much-needed STEM human capital (Boggs, G.R. 2010).
Yet, community colleges face unique challenges in shouldering their share of the national mandate. Open
enrollment policies, the commuter culture, lack of research infrastructure, and significant reliance on adjunct
instructors are but a few of these challenges. Additionally, many community college students are those least
prepared for the rigors of STEM education. Ironically, in striving to serve the needs of the under-prepared,
top community college students at the other end of the spectrum may leave if they are not being sufficiently
challenged (Atkinson R.C and Geiser S. 2009).
3.2.2 Internal Factors
STEM Innovations at HCC
HCC has already established itself as a leader in meeting the demands of its community with innovative
instructional practices. In 2004, HCC became one of the original 27 community colleges nation-wide to win
funding from the Lumina Foundation for Achieving the Dream (ATD), an initiative designed to assist students
of color and students of low income achieve greater academic success. The initial ATD strategies included
the design and implementation of student success and bridge courses. These strategies have successfully
increased retention rates (HCC fall to spring persistence rates for students improved from 68.2 percent
to 75.4 percent Fall 2002 to Fall 2010. HCC fall to fall persistence rates for students improved from 44.7
percent to 52.3 percent Fall 2002 to Fall 2009.) HCC INSPIRE will build on the proven history of ATD
success. In addition to innovative institutional practices, HCC has launched several STEM-specific pilot
programs district-wide. Among the highlights are:
• The STEM Council, newly created to coordinate STEM activities across the HCC district
• The NSF Scholars Program, a grant-funded program awarding district-wide STEM scholarships to students
participating in extracurricular activities.
• The HCC West Houston Center for Science and Engineering “Special Topics” research preparatory course
and off-campus summer research opportunities in collaboration with the University of Houston, Baylor College
of Medicine, Rice University, Purdue University, and the University of Texas – Tyler, funded by The Department
of Homeland Security and Chancellor Innovation Award.
• UST-HCC STEM & Articulation Grant, a Department of Education $5.9 million grant funding activities designed
to increase participation, retention, transfer and completion rates of Hispanic and other low-income STEM
students through a collaboration between HCC and the University of St. Thomas.
• HCC Chancellor Symposiums, involving HCC students, faculty, business and industry leaders.
2008: Life Sciences (guest speaker Dr. Malcolm Gillis, former President of Rice University and member of
BioHouston)
2009: Energy (guest speaker John Hofmeister, founder and Chief Executive of Citizens for Affordable
Energy and former President of Shell Oil).
2010: Health Sciences (guest speaker Dr. Helen W. Lane, Chief Scientist for Biological Sciences and
Space Life Sciences at NASA/Johnson Space Center.)
• Chancellor Innovation Grants to faculty. Institutional funds ($300,000-$600,000) awarded to faculty to pursue
instructional innovations including the use of mobile technology and learning communities in the sciences as
well as the technology in the scientific laboratory.
15
22. Houston Community College
In addition to district-wide programs, individual colleges have launched initiatives for enhanced STEM
opportunities including:
• Research opportunities for faculty-student pairs at The Baylor College of Medicine through HCC-Southeast
College’s Biology Department.
• Empowering the Next Generation in Agri-science with Genomics Education (ENGAGE) and Innovative
Means Promoting Agri-science Career Tracks (IMPACT), consecutive USDA grant-funded projects in
collaboration with Texas A&M University and the USDA at Baylor College of Medicine. Through ENGAGE
and IMPACT activities over 3000 HCC-Northwest College biology and chemistry students participate in oncampus, real-world research using research-grade HCC-owned instrumentation.
Clearly, HCC has demonstrated a commitment to meeting the national and local need for scientific literacy
and high-quality STEM graduates.
outstanding HCC faculty to create courses for other faculty designed to improve pedagogy, create “learnercentered” instruction, maximize ATD strategies, and allow for ongoing professional development. Both the
CIC and CTLE will be integrally involved in supporting the QEP for HCC.
Science Enrollment
The local need for STEM graduates is great and expected to continue as the area attracts STEM related
research and technology corporations. Houston residents are increasingly aware that there is job availability
in STEM fields both locally and at the national level, and that training in a STEM fields may be required to
get these jobs. Therefore, it is not surprising that 5 year trend enrollment data reflects the vast increase
in students enrolling specifically in science courses at HCC. Enrollment in biology, chemistry and physics
courses has shown steady growth, increasing 52 percent in five years. This is higher than growth in any
of the other STEM academic areas.
HCC- Five Year trend Enrollment for Science Courses,
FY 2006-2007
FY 2007-2008
FY 2008-2009
FY 2009-2010
FY 2010-2011
B I O L , C H E M , 26,032
PHYS
27,252
30,876
34,959
37,445
COLLEGE MATH 17,743
18,805
21,103
23,552
25,196
ENGR
257
547
873
1,203
Subject
172
o accommodate this growth, course sections in biology, chemistry and physics have increased accordingly.
T
This increase is reflected in both in-class and through distance education (DE) courses. In fact, enrollment
in DE biology, chemistry and physics courses is growing at a faster rate than DE overall. In fall of 2011,
12,666 students (20 percent total enrollment) were enrolled in biology, chemistry or physics courses. Of
those, 4,455 students (7 percent total enrollment) were enrolled in a core course (BIOL 1406, CHEM 1411
and PHYS 1401). In these core courses specifically, enrollment is up 37 percent in person and 196 percent
in distance education. HCC INSPIRE has the potential to have a high impact on large numbers of HCC
science students and to prepare them for STEM careers.
16
23. Houston Community College
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
BIOL-CHEMPHYS
In Person
Enrollment
9,141
9,887
11,476
12,720
12,474
Sections
452
491
522
542
532
Distance
Education
Enrollment
Sections
1206
1824
2250
53
83
87
2327
84
2933
104
Total
Enrollment
10,347
11,711
13,726
15,047
15,407
Sections
505
574
609
626
636
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
BIOL-CHEMPHYS 1406
1411 1401
Enrollment
3,309
3,660
4,075
4,376
4,358
In Person
Sections
160
175
181
186
185
Distance
Education
Enrollment
Sections
99
5
169
8
193
8
187
8
297
13
Total
Enrollment
3,408
3,829
4,268
4,563
4,655
Sections
165
183
189
194
198
Students in core biology, chemistry and physics courses are significantly more likely to be full-time
students (58.4 percent vs. 29.9 percent) and recent high-school graduates. Forty-seven percent of
students enrolled in target core courses are aged 18-22. The same age cohort represents only 37
percent of the total HCC population. Further, these students have increased retention both fall to spring
and fall to fall over HCC students in general (77% vs. 70% and 53% vs. 45% respectively). However, only
17 percent of the associates degrees awarded were the Associate in Science degree. Combined, these
data indicate that students enrolled in targeted biology, chemistry and physics courses are the type of
students who transfer to four year programs often prior to completing an associate degree. In fact, results
of the 2011 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) indicate that science students
are more likely to have the goal of transferring to a four-year college or university. Therefore, it is vital
that the core courses they take at HCC prepare them for the academic rigor and learning environment
of a four year university or college. Unfortunately, despite higher retention numbers, students in these
target courses are less likely to earn a grade of A, B or C. Student success rates are lower in targeted
courses (63.7 percent vs. 71.2 percent overall), suggesting that these students may not have the skills
required to succeed in these core courses. As students are arriving at college less ready than ever
before, it is increasingly important that we provide skills to students interested in STEM so they are ready
to succeed in their first core science course.
17
24. Houston Community College
First year student success courses have successfully been implemented at HCC as a part of the ATD
initiative designed to assist students of color and students of low income achieve greater academic success.
Initial strategies included the design and implementation of student success and bridge courses. Currently
all entering students with less than 12 college credit hours must enroll in a student success course during
their first semester. Students have had the following choices:
• GUST 1270: College and Career Exploration (for students who are undecided about a major)
• HPRS 1201: Introduction to the Health Professions
• EDUC 1200: Careers in Education
• ENGR 1201: Introduction to Engineering
• LEAD 1200: Leadership in the Workforce
The student success courses have been implemented district-wide and have had a significant impact in
terms of student success. HCC fall to spring persistence rates for students improved from 68.2 percent to
75.4 percent from the fall 2002 to fall 2010. HCC fall to fall persistence rates for students improved from
44.7 percent to 52.3 percent from the fall 2002 to fall 2009. In the fall of 2011, 476 sections of GUST1270
were offered (11,000 seat count), the largest of the success courses. GUST 1270 is designed to prepare
students for the demands of college and work. The course emphasizes prioritization, time management,
note-taking and listening skills, in addition to career assessment, financial aid, tutoring and student support
services, all skills necessary to enable students to maximize the use of college resources. Because of a
number of factors, HCC is moving from GUST 1270 to EDUC 1300: Learning Frameworks for the same
students who formerly took GUST 1270. This course, based on psychological theories of learning, will be
a more rigorous introduction for college.
Apart from HPRS 1201: Introduction to the Health Professions, HCC does not presently offer a first year
success course specific to the academic sciences. Although there are first year success courses that are
program specific, there is not a course offered that uses science content to prepare students for the specific
demands of future core science courses, despite strong and consistent growth in core science course
enrollment. Therefore, to continue and build on the proven success of ATD, one goal of the QEP will include
the design and implementation of a first year science-based student success course to prepare students
for science learning. Due to increasing enrollment in core biology, chemistry and physics courses, it is
increasingly important students be prepared and equipped with science-specific learning and study skills
that lay the foundation for future success in science courses.
HCC as a Leader in Instructional Innovation
As a result of the ATD successes, HCC received a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for
participation in the Developmental Education Initiative (DEI); and received an invitation from the Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching to participate in the Statway project. Statway is an initiative that
creates an alternative math pathway for non-STEM students. Statway students take college level Statistics as
opposed to College Algebra. In a similar way to this proposed QEP, Statway is based on learning modules
that present students with “real world” problems. For example, students are presented with various data
concerning five different breakfast cereals and asked to utilize the data to answer such questions as “Which
cereal is most nutritious?” or “Which cereal will likely sell at the cheapest price?”
This type of real world learning helps students understand the correlation between personal experience and
the material content. According to a QEP student survey (June, 2011) science students desire this same
type of relevance and real-world connection. On a scale of 1 (not helpful) to 5 (very helpful), eighty percent
of students rated “relating new information to information I already know” as “moderately to very helpful”,
18
25. Houston Community College
and eighty-one percent of students rated “seeing how new information applies to real-world situations” as
“moderately to very helpful”. When instructors emphasize relevancy to students, it increases student interest
and consequently success.
Real-world problem based learning modules, like those utilized in Statway, allow students to put their
skills into practice and demonstrate that it is not only what students learn but the way that they learn that
influences success. In the digital age where all students have one-click access to information on computers
and digital devices, it will be the student who can interpret and comprehend information who will be the
most successful. In generations past, students could suffice by preparing themselves for well-defined and
relatively predictable jobs and careers, yet many of today’s students are preparing for jobs that do not yet
exist and in time will no doubt disappear or be subject to continued and substantial change. In the workplace
of the future, long-term professional survival will depend on being able to actively adapt to rapidly evolving
technology, and to work collaboratively, solving real-world problems as they emerge. The use of online
modules to incorporate problem-based learning into the classroom has distinct advantages. The module
format will allow large scale district-wide implementation that will ensure consistency amongst HCC faculty
including a large percentage of adjunct instructors.
It is common for scientists to work collaboratively with other scientists, exchanging ideas, presenting data
at research meetings and writing papers in peer-reviewed journals. One might expect, based solely on
the collaborative nature of scientific research itself, that students in science courses are actively engaged
learners having constant interaction with classmates and the instructor. However, results of the 2011 CCSSE
indicate that science students are less likely to be engaged in class. Science students were significantly
less likely to indicate that they ask questions, make presentations or work on projects in class. Science
students were also significantly less likely to communicate with the instructor regarding grades, course
material or literature outside of the classroom. Further, HCC has only two science specific extracurricular
clubs. Research shows that actively engaged students both in and outside of the classroom are more likely
to learn, to persist, and to attain their academic goals. Reforms in science education will be necessary to
fill this need.
Concurrent to HCC efforts, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating board has recently revised the core
curriculum to ensure that students develop the essential knowledge and skills necessary for success in
college, career, community, and in life. To this end, the Coordinating board approved a 42 semester credit
hour core curriculum for all undergraduate students in Texas to be implemented in Fall 2014. The core
objectives include critical thinking skills, communication skills, empirical and quantitative skills and teamwork.
HCC INSPIRE will address and align science education reform with these new objectives.
3.3 Narrowing and Developing the QEP Focus
The HCC QEP topic, INSPIRE (INnovative Science-Program Initiatives to Reform Education) is meant to do
what its acronym suggests: set in motion innovative initiatives for district-wide education reform to improve
student learning, engagement and success at HCC. HCC INSPIRE will begin in core science courses due
to strong, consistent enrollment growth in biology, chemistry and physics core courses. Current CCSSE
and student survey data reveal that the students desire greater engagement. HCC INSPIRE will enhance
the way we teach science based on how the educational research says our students learn best. Through
the QEP development process, HCC INSPIRE has evolved into a comprehensive, integrated plan that will
lay the foundation for district-wide, sustainable, scalable science education reform at Houston Community
College. Central to meaningful reform will be the incorporation of fully-supported, faculty-driven learning
opportunities shown to improve higher-order thinking, while simultaneously ensuring science student learning,
19
26. Houston Community College
success and engagement. Through HCC INSPIRE, HCC must prepare its science students for the real
world, empowering them with intellectual capital so they will be able to continue to apply their knowledge
and succeed long after they leave HCC classrooms.
It is HCC’s vision to be “the most relevant community college in the country, the opportunity
institution for every student we serve, and essential for our community’s success
20
27. Houston Community College
4 Review of Literature and Best Practices
4.1 Literature Review
This section reviews the theory and background on real world, active, and collaborative learning techniques.
These techniques support Houston Community College defining itself as a learning college that should
embrace learner-centered practice and make “decisions [that are] evaluated in terms of the improvement of
student learning” (Muzbeck, n.d.). The best practices identified in HCC INSPIRE are in keeping with HCC’s
value of excellence and resolve to achieve student success.
Most practitioners embrace active learning as an umbrella to learner-centered education which encompasses
real world and collaborative learning. Active learning encourages student engagement to increase persistence
and real world application. It does not always involve “interaction” (Cross, 2003), but may instead generate
intra-action by stimulating learners to reflect and “self-monitor both the processes and the results of learning”
(Cross, 2003). Educators’ enhanced use of active learning in science classrooms encourages students to
achieve HCC’s defined institutional student learning outcomes (ISLOs) and competencies: reading, writing,
speaking/listening, critical thinking, and computer/information literacy.
Students, as young as age eight, exhibit science anxiety. Typically, they do not experience similar emotions
in non-science subjects. Researchers at the Science Anxiety Clinic at Loyola University Chicago questioned
college students, tested their muscle tension, and assessed their academic performance to determine how
best to reduce this behavior. Clinic professionals found that blending the following three techniques brought
about positive results and reduced anxiety in test subjects (Mallow, 2006):
• Science skills learning,
• Changing a student’s negative self-perception, and
• Desensitization, through muscle relaxation, to science anxiety-producing scenarios.
In active learning based classrooms, students feel more comfortable in their environment which helps them
feel more positive and experience less tension.
Obstacles such as science anxiety have spurred initiatives, of which HCC INSPIRE is one, to have instructors
and institutions create new approaches, new demonstrations, interactive software, and innovative pedagogies
(Tobias, 1997). For example, in one study, students’ abilities to process and integrate their understanding in
first year physics courses rose after implementation of active learning based peer instruction. Instructor Eric
Mazur (1997) discusses his students’ ability to apply Newton’s Third Law to course material. Even without
exposure to active learning, his students were able to recite definitions of the law and perform applicable
numeric problems. However, what he discovered—after issuing the famed Halloun and Hestenes (1985)
test which requires students to demonstrate an understanding about physical phenomena as opposed to
merely reciting theories—was that even after several months, students still held the conceptual beliefs with
which they entered the classroom.
During test situations, students would become frustrated because “they believe[d] they had mastered the
material” (Mazur, 1997) only to realize their knowledge could not be universally applied. After the integration
of peer instruction and concept based learning, Mazur’s students had a mean rise of 6.7 points on final
exam scores over a six year period between 1985 and 1991. Studies like his support this QEP proposal to
enhance student competencies and institute more real world, active, and collaborative learning into HCC’s
science education.
21
28. Houston Community College
Students and teachers are responsible for creating educational environments that enhance achievement.
After comparing the effects of active learning to traditional lecture based engineering courses, the hypothesis
that “active and collaborative learning instructional approaches [are] more effective than conventional . . .
methods” (Terenzini, Cabrera, Colbeck, Parente, & Bjorklund, 2001) appears validated. In a series of biology
laboratory classes at Drake University, students viewed interactive video before performing dissections.
After viewing these video tapes, students not only better understood the laboratory specimen, but their
“performance in the laboratory gained perceptibly” (Bonwell & Eison, 1991). Additionally, frustration was
reduced and the “quality of the dissections greatly improved” (Bonwell & Eison, 1991). Bonwell and Eison
also discuss similar results taking place in chemistry classes.
Instructors in active learning communities assume a facilitator role and reassign the responsibility of learning
to their students. Learners become engaged in their own education, which often requires “reorientation”
(Cross, 2003) since most students have little experience in self-exploration and evaluation. Instructors and
students should readily welcome this change when they recognize the potential rewards.
Real World Learning
Real world learning, similar to problem based learning (PBL), is initiated by the presentation of a problem,
challenge, or research question centered on a topic relevant to everyday life and career. PBL centers around
content knowledge perceived as relevant and important by students. Educators should apply PBL to their
teaching because “most students can be taught anything as long as it is relevant to their world” (Tileston,
2000). Learners gravitate toward experiences that satiate their need to understand the correlation between
personal experience and presented material. When educators effectively demonstrate real world relevancy,
the “energizing and curiosity-inducing dimensions of problems that form the basis and rationale for using
problems in teaching and learning” (Barrett & Moore, 2011) occur and make learning more enjoyable. This,
then, increases learner interest and success.
When students are spectators in a classroom, they are less engaged and less likely to demonstrate mastery
of the student learning outcomes (SLOs) necessary for success. Students who demonstrate a mastery of
Knowledge, the first of the six levels that construct Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Domain, often identify
their comprehension with key words such as (Clark, 2010):
Defines
Labels
Outlines
Selects
Describes
Lists
Recalls
States
Identifies
Matches
Recognizes
Knows
Names
Reproduces
Unengaged students characteristically climb the Cognitive Domain ladder at a comparatively slower pace
than their actively engaged peers. Students immersed in environments that endorse active learning are
empirically quicker to achieve higher levels of Cognitive Domain. Students that exhibit evaluation, the highest
level of cognitive domain, are identified by terms including (Clark, 2010):
Appraises
Criticizes
Discriminates
Justifies
Compares
Critiques
Evaluates
Relates
Concludes
Defends
Explains
Summarizes
Contrasts
Describes
Interprets
Supports
22
29. Houston Community College
Science based guided inquiry refers to actions that expand students’ “knowledge and understanding of
scientific ideas, as well as [the] understanding of how scientists study the natural world” (National Science
Education Standards, 1996). This involves “a scenario, a case, a challenge, a visual prompt, a dilemma,
a design brief, [or] a puzzling phenomenon” that creates an incentive to learning (Barrett & Moore, 2011).
Guided inquiry has been employed throughout science curricula and especially health care programs. Health
care students parlay “clinical relevance, small group interactions, and active learning” (Solomon, 2011)
into inquiry based PBL opportunities. Health care program instructors offer real life medical and ethical
problems to students. These scenarios stimulate discussions regarding learned information and how better
to conjecture potential outcomes. Questions presented may require factual knowledge, literature evaluation,
or integration (Solomon, 2011), which are key elements of guided inquiry in the sciences.
Problem-based learning (PBL) is a total approach to inquiry advocated by constructivist proponents.
Constructivists believe that learners create and interpret knowledge for themselves through experience.
Until the late 1960s, most science programs were teacher-centered and lecture formatted. Medical scientists
were among the first professionals to “assert that students could learn basic science content without sitting
in a lecture hall eight hours a day for two years” (Korin & Wilkerson, 2011). Though the first medical school
to formally revise its curriculum was McMaster Medical School in 1969, it was not until Harvard Medical
School implemented a hybridized lecture/PBL program that other schools “began adopting a problem-based
pedagogical approach to address knowledge integration across courses and years” (Korin & Wilkerson, 2011).
Modern views of learner centered education have inspired projects which heighten real life application and
inquiry based problem solving. Data demonstrates that changes in curriculum expand learning outcomes,
sustain engagement, increase problem complexity, and modify the shift from basic science content to clinical
content (Korin & Wilkerson, 2011).
Writing components within science education have recently been added into standards and curriculum because
of writing’s essential place among highly regarded teaching strategies. When students are asked to write
in science based PBL programs, they must interpret presented problems and offer hypotheses, data, and
conclusions. This can be difficult for beginning science students since writing scientifically revolves around
“factual information about structure, function, or events” (Clopton, 2011). Clopton, an introductory biology
instructor, requires students to read science based research articles and write narratives in response. This
task promotes “learning about the processes of scientific thinking and investigation” (Clopton, 2011) which
are necessary critical thinking and writing skills. Some students have to learn writing skills (specifically
those needed in science) concurrently with learning science skills and concepts. In the past, students who
passed summative exams were judged knowledgeable. It is now believed that writing, unlike traditional
testing, is a decidedly constructivist approach to formative assessment (Clopton, 2011) that couples with
active learning techniques.
Active Learning
Active learning challenges students to move from remote participation to centralized participation. With
institutional support, this teaching methodology requires students to individualize their learning needs,
take responsibility for completing assigned tasks, and perform self-assessments. With practice, students’
awareness of their strengths and weaknesses heighten. The wide-reaching shift from instructor-centered
to student-centered teaching in science education signifies institutions’ desires to enhance achievement.
23
30. Houston Community College
Notably though, evidence suggests that success increases when students are slowly initiated into the
reorientation process required of participants in active learning environments. Therefore, students who
undertake several active learning based science courses must rapidly discover the accountability required
of active learners. They may not be as successful as peers who enroll in fewer science courses their first
year. As such, post-secondary institutions limit the number of science courses that science majors can take
during their first year (Hrabowski, 2005) due to science’s intimidating perception. Active learning requires
students to challenge themselves and become committed to learning. Institutions are expected to create
pathways that strive to achieve this outcome to help create “motivated, thinking, responsible, and productive
citizens for the next century” (Tileston, 2000).
Teachers are responsible for employing guided inquiry and “orienting students to the goals and purposes
of active learning, making decisions about . . . learning groups, assigning and structuring learning tasks,
assuming active participation . . . and monitoring and assessing learning” (Cross, 2003) beyond students’ selfassessments. Such deviation from the traditional teaching experience often necessitates faculty orientation
and training. Professional development is essential to introduce faculty to the positive impact that active
learning can achieve and to provide collegial support networks. Such networks encourage “everybody to
work to top capacity” (Brandt, 1987) and to provide well researched, goal oriented educational opportunities
for students. When Mazur read articles by Halloun and Hestenes and researched best physics teaching
strategies, he assumed the necessary responsibility to teach in an active manner and best help his students
critically think about presented curriculum. In an active learning environment, teachers must be cognizant
to employ best practices.
Student success and satisfaction are important factors reliant upon, among other things, Student Faculty
Interaction (SFI). Results from The Harvard Assessment Seminars, a formal review of SFI practices, showed
that 97 percent of men and 95 percent of women were satisfied with their school experience when they
had personal contact with faculty (Light, 1992). Furthermore, “nearly every student who describes strong
academic performance can point to a specific activity that ties academic work closely to another person or
group” (Light, 1992). Light also points out that in addition to peers, the “other person is often a professor
who is supervising the student’s work in a small class” (Light, 1992). A benefit of an education at HCC is the
relatively small classroom sizes which facilitate SFI. Faculty members that employ active learning practices
are more likely to interact with students and utilize active learning if they are knowledgeable about the effects
and successes the combination of active learning and SFI will have.
Collaborative Learning
Collaborative learning is defined as a “learning paradigm [in which] there is positive interdependence among
a group of students in the learning process and each student is both individually accountable for his/her
own learning and responsible for other group members’ learning” (Sapon-Shevin & Schniedewind, 1992).
It is vital to the long term improvement of curriculum because “students teaching other students” is one of
the “most effective methods of teaching” (McKeachie & Svinicki, 2006). Several studies, including metaanalyses done by David and Roger Johnson, have been conducted on the differences between collaborative
and competitive learning environments. Empirically, students with a background in collaborative learning
not only succeed academically at higher rates than alumnae of traditional classrooms, but are also more
“positive, committed, [and] involved in more caring relationships” (Johnson, 1993).
24
31. Houston Community College
As an “accepted and highly recommended instructional procedure,” (Johnson & Johnson, n.d.) considerable
evidence exists that promotes collaborative learning as one of the most preferred methods of teaching.
Collaborative learning can be used effectively to teach any subject matter, including science, and provide
the skills necessary for success. Johnson and Johnson provide strong evidence that collaborative learning
promotes higher levels of “academic achievement, leadership training, group decision making, conflict
management” (Brandt, 1987), and social support. Social support often “provides the [necessary means]
to improve attendance, personalize the educational experience . . . and improve the quality of school life”
(Johnson & Johnson, n.d.). Collaborative learning helps reduce the “revolving door” effect that numerous
community colleges, including HCC, experience.
Collaborative learning techniques, by necessity, involve active learning. Collaborative learning falls under
the umbrella of learner-centered teaching since “students must [actively] talk about what they are learning,
relate it to past experiences, apply it to authentic problems, [and] construct their own meaning” (Stage, Muller,
Kinzie, & Simmons, 1998). In traditional, teacher-centered classrooms, students have few opportunities
to learn the interpersonal communication skills necessary to have meaningful academic dialogue. Their
communications skills, therefore, often align with the first levels of Cognitive Domain, and the lower levels
of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Affective Domain. Students who Receive Information, the first level of Affective
Domain, often identify with key words such as (Clark, 2010):
Asks
Gives
Points to
Uses
Chooses
Holds
Selects
Replies
Describes
Identifies
Sits
Names
Follows
Locates
Erects
Gives
Introducing more collaborative learning into science courses at HCC gives students the opportunity to
achieve higher levels of Affective Domain because they will experience increased communication with
others. In addition, students will have better “intergroup relations, acceptance of academically handicapped
classmates, and increased self-esteem” (Slavin, 1995). Identifiers associated with student participation at
the Characterization level, the highest level of Affective Domain, are (Clark, 2010):
Acts
Listens
Proposes
Serves
Discriminates
Modifies
Qualifies
Solves
Displays
Performs
Questions
Verifies
Influences
Practices
Revises
Communication is the foundation of a successful collaborative based classroom. Two of the four chief
communication methods mentioned in 10 BEST Teaching Practices (Tileston, 2000) help secondary students
benefit from significant educational experiences.
25
32. Houston Community College
1. Communication between teachers and students
Educators set their classroom tone. When students regularly interact with instructors, results similar to
those described in the Harvard Assessment Seminars (Light, 1992) occur. SFI leads to improved classroom
attendance, stronger classroom communities, and higher academic achievement. Teachers who are skilled
classroom managers move about their classroom to observe activities, join student discussions, and avail
themselves to questions or comments.
2. Communication between students
Students in collaborative learning based classrooms are frequently divided into formal and informal groups that
can be long or short term and vary in size. Practitioners agree that five is the ideal group number. Students
in fours often split themselves into pairs while threes often become a “pair and an outsider” (Cross, 2000).
Grouping presents several opportunities to work toward a common goal and “engage in group processing”
(Yager, Johnson, Johnson, & Snider, 2001). “The purpose of group processing is to clarify and improve
the effectiveness of [group] members in contributing to . . . collaborative efforts to learn” (Yager, Johnson,
Johnson, & Snider, 2001). Through exercises like group processing, students are exposed to student
diversity. By integrating their opinions, students learn to appreciate each other’s differences and learn from
them. Diversity awareness and appreciation are central to the community college experience. Learning how
to communicate effectively with peers is an important life skill learned through collaboration.
Formerly, students were considered “passive recipients of knowledge” (Johnson, Johnson, & Smith, 1998)
that thrived in competitive, individualistic environments propelled by extrinsic rewards. Students are now
recognized for their vibrant backgrounds which augment classroom discussion, knowledge construction,
evaluation, and interaction. Implementation of HCC INSPIRE initiatives corresponds to the paradigm shift
in post-secondary education today. Real-world, active, and collaborative learning will enable students to
develop their own understanding in science education, allowing them the opportunity to critically analyze
content, strengthen communication skills, and connect course material to real life.
4.2 Review of Best Practices and Suggestions for Implementation
A critical review of pertinent best practices, with thoughtful recommendations, very recently published by
Felder, Brent and Prince, (Felder, Brent, & Prince, 2011) is particularly relevant to the HCC INSPIRE program. Felder, Brent, and Prince explicitly address engineering education, but every point equally applies
to all STEM disciplines, including those to participate in HCC INSPIRE.
The recommendations in this study take the form of critical decisions made by an institution among several
reasonable alternatives in four categories of activities. Through a brief description of the best practices,
and the thrust of the decision-making/recommendation, those best practices appropriate to HCC INSPIRE
can be identified. (Some of the categories are only briefly touched on here, since they form the content of
other sections of this document.)
26
33. Houston Community College
The categories to be addressed are:
• Faculty training and development
• Course development and implementation
• Assessment of results
• Creating a supportive campus culture.
The critical decisions revolve around considerations of:
• Institutional type, charter and resources
• Scope of the program, whether institution-wide or limited to specific disciplines
• Composition and experience of faculty
A few global aspects need to be addressed for the sake of effectiveness of the program.
Faculty Training and Development
A wide range of activities are covered by this term. Workshops are widely used, and may meet once yearly
or per semester, and may be institution-wide or limited in attendance to faculty in a particular field or closelyrelated set of disciplines, such as the STEM fields. The facilitators of the workshops may be external to the
institution, or drawn from its members. Typically, workshops meet for a full day or two consecutive days.
In general, for workshops to be effective in leading to positive changes in STEM instructors’ teaching
activities, and in the students’ learning, the facilitator(s) need be expert in both STEM content and pedagogical
theory. There are few candidates who meet both criteria, so it is advantageous to have two facilitators, one
expert in the STEM content, the other in the pedagogical content. STEM faculty members are unlikely to
seriously consider changing their teaching habits on the words of an expert in another field, unless joined
by a respected colleague in their own area.
Seminars, meeting perhaps weekly or biweekly, can also introduce new active learning ideas, and have an
advantage over workshops in that the development instrument continues while faculty experiment with the
changes, and discuss their experiences with one another. Seminars would typically include faculty from a
single discipline or a set of STEM disciplines. (The multiple-campus structure of HCC might militate against
the use of seminars of this type.)
Mentoring (experienced member paired with a novice) or Partnering (pairing of peers) can be a very effective
method of implementing and monitoring the success of active learning techniques in the classroom, so long
as the association involves frequent discussion of the activities, and endures for at least a semester. A variant
of this is Consulting, in which an outside expert works individually with one or several faculty members.
A Learning Community may be formed for the purpose of faculty development. A Learning Community in
this context is defined by “a community of faculty members who organize themselves around individual or
communal activities intended to improve their teaching and to provide support and guidance to one another.”
(Cox, 2004) The implication is that the existence of a Learning Community is also a measure of success of
the program, since the Learning Community is formed on the initiative of its members, who are presumably
active participants and wish to “raise their game”.
27
34. Houston Community College
Finally, a last method to mention is a Teacher Certification Program, which is rarely used for STEM faculty
in the United States, but common in some other countries. These programs include mandatory instructional
development. Literature suggests that such programs are successful only if strongly supported on a national
level, which makes it reasonable to consider a Teacher Certification Program beyond the scope of this QEP
program.
Multiple Methods appear to be needed. Rarely, if ever, would the use of only a single one of the methods
listed above be considered best practice. Rather, a best practice program would combine, say, a workshop
and/or seminar series with a mentoring, partnering, consulting and/or a learning community part. An implication
is that workshops and seminars can recruit faculty members to participation in the active learning effort.
Sustaining that participation appears to be the major contribution of the other methods, with mentoring and
consulting guiding the novice, and partnering and learning communities sustaining the progress of more
mature practitioners.
The descriptions of activities engaged in as parts of the Mentoring, Consulting, Partnering and Learning
Community methods invariably include either classroom observation or video recording of teaching and
student responses in the classroom. The observations and/or recordings of classroom activities provide
concrete data on the effect of the methods. Collection of these data is not explicitly mandated as best practice
in implementing these methods, but there is a strong implication that the effectiveness of the methods could
be greatly compromised without it.
A discussion of best practices in instructional development would be remiss without reference to the principles
that learning theory indicates are essential to the design of the program. A succinct tabulation of these is
described in the chart below.
Factors that motivate adult learning (adapted from Wlodkowski, 1999)
Factor
1. Expertise of presenters
2. Relevance of content
3. Choice in application
4. Praxis (action plus reflection)
5. Group work
Rationale
Adults expect their teachers to be experts in the
material being taught, well-prepared to teach it,
and knowledgeable about the interests, needs, and
problems of their audience.
Adults may quickly become impatient with material
they cannot easily relate to their personal interests
or professional needs.
Adults respond well when given options about
whether, when, and how to apply recommended
methods, and are skeptical of “one size fits all”
prescriptions.
Adults appreciate opportunities to see implementations
of methods being taught and to try the methods
themselves, and then to reflect on and generalize
the outcomes.
Adults enjoy and benefit from sharing their knowledge
and experiences with their colleagues.
28
35. Houston Community College
Overall, there are two substantial supports needed for a successful program of instructional development:
(1) some meaningful incentive for faculty members to participate in the program, and (2) some meaningful
reward for any improvements in teaching that may result from their participation. (Felder, Brent, & Prince,
2011) There are no prescriptive best practices to provide these supports. This is supported by another
researcher in the statement that “If quality teaching is not explicitly expected and rewarded as an institutional
priority, faculty may feel that participation in such a program to strengthen teaching and improve student
learning is not highly valued by administrators compared to other activities. Therefore, administrators may
need to provide some form of external motivation for faculty participation” (Romano, 2004).
Another factor is that substantial change takes time as the American Association for the Advancement of
Science’s Program 2061 indicates: “Sensible professionals do not replace their strongly held views and
behavior patterns in response to fiat or the latest vogue; instead, they respond to developing sentiment
among respected colleagues, to incentives that reward serious efforts to explore new possibilities, and to
the positive feedback that may come from trying out new ideas from time to time—all of which can take
years.” (Ahlgren, A. and Rutherford, A.J. 1991)
It should also be recognized that a high percentage of the science courses at HCC are taught by adjunct
instructors, so HCC INSPIRE initiatives have to accommodate both full-time instructors with heavy teaching
loads and part-time instructors who may be transient and dealing with the needs of students from several
institutions. This direction responds to the simple observation that inclusion only of the full-time faculty
would have a limited impact on student learning because students do not distinguish courses taught by
full-time faculty or part-time faculty.
Therefore, district-wide implementation of a successful program will require inclusion of the following elements:
1. Recruitment: Implement on-going workshops for science faculty, with two primary stated purposes:
• 1.1.Recruitment of part-time and full-time faculty to active participation in HCC INSPIRE. Participating faculty
become members of an HCC INSPIRE Faculty Development Community. The presenter of the recruitment
part of the program might be a respected member of the science faculty at HCC.
• 1.2.Presentation of ongoing real-world, active and collaborative learning programs at other institutions, with
statistics comparing learning outcomes with those of traditional teaching techniques. This might be by someone
of a stature on the level of Dr. Richard M. Felder of North Carolina State University.
2. Incentive: A salary premium under contract per course for volunteers participating in the program.
3.Responsibilities:
• 3.1. Attendance and participation in periodic seminars of HCC INSPIRE Faculty Development Community
members. The seminars might be inclusive of all STEM disciples at a college, or limited to a particular discipline,
depending on the number of members available.
• 3.2. Frequent attendance and video recording of classes of other participants, and having such observance
and recording of one’s own classes.
• 3.3. Formation of at least one Mentor relationship or Peer Partner relationship each semester with another
participant. Frequent meetings with the partner for mutual review of classroom recordings.
• 3.4. Implementation of at least one Collaborative Learning Module per semester for a course taught during
that semester.
29
36. 4. Continuity of the Program:
• 4.1. One can reasonably expect a hesitant start to such a program. It may take three to five years before a
solid core of faculty stabilizes the HCC INSPIRE Faculty Development Community. During this startup period,
the participation level may be volatile, and a considerable amount of administrative nurturing may be required.
• 4.2. The goals of the program can only be obtained with a firm, unwavering commitment from the administration,
especially during the early years of the program. This requires a determined financial commitment by the
institution.
• 4.3. Safeguards against gaming the program by uncommitted or nonperforming faculty would be necessary.
Professional quality work should be demanded. Participants who do not fulfill the responsibilities of the
program should not be offered continuing contracts. Contracts could be limited to a single course for each
faculty member, at least initially.
• 4.4. Experienced and productive members of the HCC INSPIRE Faculty Development Community will rightfully
come to think of themselves as a teaching elite, whose example will draw the most talented of the pool of
adjunct instructors into the program. When this level is reached, the program will have become self-sustaining.
• 4.5. The experience of students taught by the members of the HCC INSPIRE Faculty Development Community
will result in a higher level of student achievement and eventual competition by universities and private industry
to attract graduates of the HCC INSPIRE program.
• 4.6. Membership in the HCC INSPIRE Faculty Development Community should be mandatory for volunteers
in the program, instead of developing over time from the initiative of the volunteers. This forcing seems slight
given the incentive offered for volunteers, and has the potential for speeding the attainment of maturity for the
program as a whole.
• 4.7. Over time, a library of modules for the STEM courses should build, providing choices of modules available
for use by instructors, and also providing good templates for future modules to be developed by inexperienced
volunteers. Thus a critical mass of high-quality modules should be attained in the program, which provides
another source of stability and continuity for the program.
37. Houston Community College
5 The QEP: HCC INSPIRE Goals, Activities, and Student Learning Outcomes
QEP PURPOSE STATEMENT: HCC INSPIRE will improve student learning, engagement
and success in the sciences.
The QEP development process produced a plan to reform science instruction at HCC. The traditional mode
of lecture-based instruction will be enhanced by the incorporation of real-world problem based learning in
the classroom. Literature searches and a study of best-practices across the nation helped confirm that
plans to change science instruction would conform to national trends. Many HCC science students have the
goal of transferring to a four-year college or university. Therefore, it is vital that the core courses they take
at HCC prepare them for the academic rigor and learning environment of a four year university or college.
Experience in the HCC classroom will teach them to practice science skills while solving real-world problems,
and help them apply what they have learned outside of the classroom. Three goals and related activities
have been identified that will result in a transformation of science teaching and learning.
Goal 1: Ensure science course readiness
Activities include the design of a first year science-based student success course to prepare students for
science learning.
Goal 2: Institutionalize real-world, active and collaborative learning in science courses
Activities include the implementation of real-world problem-based, active and collaborative learning modules
to enhance learning and engagement in science courses. Activities within the modules will allow students
to put science skills into practice..
Goal 3: Offer district-wide science enrichment opportunities
Activities include district-wide organization of faculty-sponsored science clubs to promote student engagement
and provide enrichment opportunities for students to apply science knowledge outside of the classroom.
31
38. Houston Community College
5.1 Goal 1: Ensure science course readiness
HCC INSPIRE will create a science-based first year success course (S-FSC) to ensure science course
readiness.
QEP GOAL:
STRATEGY:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL1:
Science First Year
Success Course
1: Develop science-based Science First Year Success Course
Ensure science
course readiness
2: Train faculty to teach Science First Year Success Course
3: Offer and implement Science First Year Success Course
4: Improve student science learning & study skills (an SLO-driven objective)
5: Improve student success in science courses
5.1.1: A science-based first year success course (S-FSC)
More students are arriving at college less ready than ever before. Many students lack the necessary
motivation, self-discipline, and fundamental academic skills to gather, conceptualize and process knowledge.
They arrive with limited awareness of possible science career paths and an educational plan to succeed.
Hence any implementation of science teaching best practices must be accompanied, or preceded by ensuring
science students have the tools, information and the support necessary for successful progression through
rigorous core science courses.
As noted in chapter 3, HCC has created a series of first year success courses for students interested in
pursuing study and work in engineering, education, the health sciences or the workforce in general, as well
as students who are “undecided” regarding a major. These courses go beyond a standard orientation or
study skills course, and include information about career exploration, time management techniques, financial
aid, and academic advising. One of the goals of every first year success course is that every student will
leave the course with a degree plan in hand. The establishment of these personal goals in freshman success
courses has led to a marked increase in student persistence, completion, or transfer.
Currently, of the five first year success courses offered, one is designated specifically for students who
are “undecided” (GUST1270). GUST1270 is designed to prepare students for the demands of college and
work. The course emphasizes prioritization, time management, note-taking and listening skills, in addition
to career assessment, financial aid, tutoring and student support services, all skills necessary to enable
students to maximize the use of college resources. For a number of reasons related to state approval of
courses, GUST1270 is being replaced with EDUC1300: Learning Frameworks in the Fall 2012 semester.
The proposed science-based first year success course (S-FSC) will incorporate science specific units within
the EDUC1300 course. In other words, a science emphasis will be added to certain sections of EDUC1300.
Students interested in science will be highly encouraged to sign up for the S-FSC versions of EDUC1300.
However, since all freshmen with less than 12 credit hours are required to take a success course, many
“undecided” students may enroll in the S-FSC sections and will benefit from improved science study skills
even though they may not be headed into a science career. Capturing a wider audience all across our
district will maximize the impact of the S-FSC.
SLOs for the S-FSC component of EDUC1300 are outlined in the table below. The course will incorporate
basic science learning skills, science vocabulary study skills as well as instruction regarding scientific data
and its presentation in graphs, figures and tables. The course will still cover the traditional EDUC1300
first year success course topics such as learning theories and strategies. However, the career information
portion of the course will emphasize science and science-related careers.
32
39. Houston Community College
QEP Objective:
Target Population:
Student Learning Outcomes:
Objective 1.4:
Improve student
science learning &
study skills
Science First Year
Success Course
(S-FSC) students
SLO 1.4.a: S-FSC students will demonstrate effective note taking, text
annotation, outlining and creation of graphic organizers to aid in the
comprehension of scientific information
SLO 1.4.b: S-FSC students will demonstrate effective science vocabulary
study skills
SLO 1.4.c: S-FSC students will be able to interpret scientific information,
figures and tables
SLO 1.4.d: S-FSC students will demonstrate an understanding of the scientific
method
The move from GUST 1270 to EDUC 1300 is very important in terms of strengthening students’ basic
understanding of learning in more rigorous ways. The course description of EDUC 1300 from the Texas
Academic Course Guide Manual is as follows:
• A study of the research and theory in the psychology of learning, cognition, and motivation.
• Factors that impact learning
• Application of learning strategies. Theoretical models of strategic learning, cognition, and motivation serve as
the conceptual basis for the introduction of college- level student academic strategies. Students use assessment
instruments (e.g., learning inventories) to help them identify their own strengths and weaknesses as strategic
learners. Students are ultimately expected to integrate and apply the learning skills discussed across their
own academic programs and become effective and efficient learners. Students developing these skills should
be able to continually draw from the theoretical models they have learned.
The QEP Director and the QEP Steering Committee will create an S-FSC Curriculum Development Team
from faculty applicants. This Team will consist of science faculty from biology, chemistry and physics, an
EDUC1300 Program Committee member, an Instructional Design Specialist, and a Multimedia/IT Specialist.
The S-FSC Curriculum Development Team will be responsible for the development of course materials,
exercises and assessments. The S-FSC curriculum will be presented to the Science Program committees
and the EDUC Program Committee for approval before piloting in Spring 2014. This will allow thorough
completion of the EDUC1300 curriculum, currently under construction by the EDUC1300 Curriculum
Committee, before adding the science-based units. It is expected that the Curriculum Development Team
members who created the course will pilot it at their respective colleges. Other science instructors who are
on the QEP Steering Committee and other QEP committees may also be interested in teaching pilot courses
at their colleges. Training will be provided for S-FSC instructors. The QEP Director and all members of the
various QEP committees and teams will be expected to publicize existence of the new course to counselors,
academic advisors, and high school counselors. The course will be fully developed and offered throughout
the district in the fall semester of the fourth year of the QEP.
Increasing science course enrollment has created a need for students to be prepared and equipped with
science-specific learning and study skills before enrolling in core science courses. Students who complete
an S-FSC course will be prepared, and have a solid foundation for future success in science courses. The
implementation and assessment timelines and processes for Goal 1 activities are explained in section 8 of
this document and detailed in Appendix 9.3.
33
40. Houston Community College
5.2 Goal 2: Institutionalize real-world, active and collaborative learning in science courses
HCC INPIRE will implement real-world problem-based, active and collaborative learning modules to enhance learning and engagement in science courses.
QEP GOALS:
STRATEGY:
OBJECTIVES:
GOAL 2:
Institutionalize
real-world.active
and collaborative
learning in science courses
Eagle Online science
modules
1: Develop high quality.comprehensive Eagle Online science learning
modules
2: Train science faculty to deliver the Eagle Online modules
3: Implement Eagle Online modules in science courses
4: Improve science student engagement
5: Improve student science content knowledge & science process
skills (an SLO- driven objective)
According to its mission, HCC offers a high-quality education, facilitates lifelong learning and prepares
individuals in HCC’s diverse communities for life and work in a global and technological society. Students
must learn to think in increasingly rigorous and complex ways, not only to advance their academic and
work careers, but to survive and thrive in our rapidly changing world. HCC’s students indicate a need for
connection and application of learning skills to real-world situations. On HCC’s 2010 Community College
of Student Engagement Survey (CCSSE), HCC students reported no significant improvement from the
previous year in “acquiring job [or work-related knowledge and] skills,” Further, science students expressed
a desire for relevance and a real-world connection according to HCC’s QEP Development student survey
conducted in June 2011. HCC INSPIRE will reform science education in the classroom to incorporate real
world relevance to students. In addition, HCC INSPIRE will address and align science education reform to
meet the new state core curriculum objectives targeted for implementation by the Texas Higher Education
Coordinating Board in 2014.
Real-world problem based instruction allows students to see the correlation between personal experience
and the material content. An effective method for instruction is harnessing what the student already knows
and building upon it. Effective science educators should strive to make science content relevant to students
“real-life” outside of the classroom, so they may make connections between what they already know and
what they are learning in class and through the assignments they do outside of class. Many HCC science
instructors already incorporate forms of real-world conceptually-oriented tasks into classes, but this has not
been done consistently across the district.
HCC has nearly 80,000 students across six colleges located on twenty-two campuses. The sheer size and
geographical configuration of the school necessitates the need to target high enrollment core curriculum
courses for reform. In order to achieve this ambitious goal, HCC INSPIRE will start with implementing
user-friendly modules into basic science courses beginning with General Biology I (BIOL 1406), General
Chemistry I (CHEM 1411) and College Physics I (PHYS 1401). The modular instruction will be a cost-effective
approach to changing the pedagogy in the classroom, allowing many full-time and part-time instructors
to unite multiple learning styles with multiple teaching styles. HCC will leverage existing resources and
expertise whenever possible (e.g., HCC Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence, college Curriculum
and Innovation Centers, the HCC Distance Education department, and the Library staff), especially during
the beginning phases of the QEP. Due to increased funding of STEM course innovations over the last two
decades, particularly by federal granting agencies such as the National Science Foundation and others,
there are many excellent module materials available. Some of these incorporate the hallmarks of effective
real-world, active and collaborative learning identified in the best-practices research. Further, many of these
34