Call Girls Tirupati Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Exploring the Relationship between HTA and Knowledge Management.
1. Exploring the Relationship between HTA
and Knowledge Management
Two Sides of the Same Coin
Rosmin Esmail MSc, CHE
Director, Clinical Epidemiology
Health Technology Assessment & Innovation
HTAi Conference, June 25, 2012 Bilbao, Spain
2. Background
• Formation of Alberta
Health Services (2009)
• 117 000 employees
• 7400 physicians
• 3.7 million
• Formation of HTAI
(2009)
2
4. HTA & Innovation – What We Do
HTA & Innovation Team
Support an evidence-informed decision model for managing health technologies
Identify, prioritize, assess health technology (devices and processes) expected to
significantly impact patient safety, clinical/cost effectiveness, health outcomes,
clinical practice, human resources, and/or policy
Investigate innovative alternatives for current health technology to improve safety,
quality, and/or outcomes
Promote effective and appropriate uptake of technologies
Validate effectiveness of promising health technologies with access through
evidence development initiatives (field evaluations, trials and pilot projects)
4
5. Key Message
To explore and advance the
relationship between knowledge
management and HTA.
5
6. Definition: Knowledge Management
A set of principles, tools and practices
that enable people to create
knowledge, and to share, translate
and apply what they know to create
value and improve effectiveness.
World Health Organization, 2009
6
7. Definition: Knowledge Translation
An ongoing, iterative and interactive
process that focuses on actively
translating research evidence into a
useable form that will enhance its
implementation into practice.
(Scott et al, 2007)
7
8. Two sides of the same coin…
HTA and KM are inter-related
HTA is an ally, a knowledge-broker
Both are needed for evidence-informed
decision making
8
9. Alberta Health Services
UNIT
Health Technology Assessment and Innovation
ED e
( A nc
)
nt
nt ide
ai s t
pr en
me
on
al
me Ev
Ap sm
ati
ss
lop ith
FUNCTION
& ses
ov
se
ve w
as
Inn
De ess
As
DRAFT
Re
c
Ac
PLAN
Knowledge Management & Translation
AHS
PROGRAM health
promotion
disease
prevention
public screening diagnosis intervention CDM continuing palliative
health rehabilitation care
OR
SERVICE
10. Strategy #1
Connect people to evidence-
informed decision making through
dissemination
Technology briefing notes
Operational financial
impact analysis
Reviews
10
11. Strategy #2
Provide skills to use evidence
through the application of the
knowledge cycle
11
12. Strategy #3
Support sharing of HTA knowledge
by engaging stakeholders through
knowledge transfer activities
12
14. Communities of Practice
HTAI
A process of learning when a group of people with a common
interest or problem come together regularly to share ideas,
find solutions and build innovation.
14
15. Strategy #4
Facilitate, review and implement ,
evaluate best and innovative
practices in HTA
15
16. Challenges Ahead…
Building a knowledge
sharing culture
Getting buy in
Resistance to change
Human & Financial Resources
16
18. “A little knowledge that acts
is worth infinitely more than much knowledge
that is idle.” …Khalil Gibran
Notas del editor
There once was department called HTAI. We now have 7 team members and it is now 2 and a bit years old (November 2009). It is responsible for: supporting an evidence-informed decision model for managing health technologies that helps to: Build capacity to identify, prioritize, assess health technology Investigate innovative alternatives for current health technology Promote effective and appropriate uptake of technologies Validate effectiveness of promising health technologies with access through evidence development initiatives (field evaluations, trials and pilot projects) Coordinate activities with the Alberta Advisory Committee on Health Technologies
Innovation-importance to use sound evidence both to be a gatekeeper to ineffective technologies from spreading inappropriately as it is important to stimulate introducing technologies (innovation).
That process involves managing knowledge. But knowledge alone doesn’t change behaviour, we need knowledge translation as well. Knowledge management is understood to be an umbrella term encompassing the many unique but related facets of knowledge – exchange, transfer and uptake among them. While there is no universally accepted definition of KM, most are extremely similar. There are several definitions of KM, Knowledge Translations, K exchange, knowledge transfer, K mobilization. It is important to have a common understanding. This is the one that AHS and HTAI has adopted. It resonated the most with clinicians. We are going to apply this definition to HTAI.
As described in the CIHR Act, knowledge translation is a broad concept. It encompasses all steps between the creation of new knowledge and its application to yield beneficial outcomes for society. The concept includes knowledge dissemination, technology transfer, consideration of the ethical context, knowledge management, knowledge utilization, the two-way exchange between researchers and those who apply knowledge, implementation research, technology assessment, synthesis of results within a global context, and the development of consensus guidelines. The overriding principle is that interactions between researchers and stakeholders may vary in intensity, complexity, and level of engagement depending on the nature of the research results and on the needs of the particular stakeholder. KM is about managing knowledge, KT is about putting it into action or closing the ‘know do’ gap from research to practice. a dynamic and iterative process that includes the synthesis, dissemination, exchange and ethically sound application of knowledge to improve the health of Canadians, provide more effective health services and products and strengthen the healthcare system.
Definition of HTA The systematic evaluation of properties, effects, and/or impacts of health care technology, i.e., safety, effectiveness, feasibility, cost, cost-effectiveness, and potential social, legal and ethical impact of a technology. It may address the direct, intended consequences of technologies as well as indirect, unintended consequences. (International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment). Chris Henshall (2005) at the WHO meeting provided the only direct ref to this relationship. He stated that bridging the “know-do” gap is much to do with HTA as KM. Close collaboration on WHO’s work on HTA and KM was emphasized in bridging this gap. They both address the fundamental need in healthcare today which is to put the vast amount of knowledge into action and practice. Coupling KM with an analytical tool such as HTA strengthens the application of both in EIDM HTA acts as a knowledge broker, within the health care system by collecting, analyzing and disseminating useful knowledge
Applying the principles of Knowledge management and Knowledge translation to HTAI-getting the stuff in our heads-the tacit knowledge and evidence-the explicit knowledge into practice. Through the development of a KM/KT plan which will focus on the dissemination of recommendations and results of projects from all 4 programs, provide skills to use evidence through the application of the knowledge cycle and engage stakeholders through knowledge transfer activities. It will do this with the following 4 strategies. Assessment & Appraisal reviews and makes recommendations on health technologies through the systematic evaluation of global literature with respect to the clinical and economic properties, effects and direct and indirect impacts of emerging health technology. Application of this evidence to the AHS context is a key function. This program will also identify and prioritize emerging health technologies and coordinate outcomes monitoring and reporting. Reassessment leads proactive re-assessments of potentially obsolete and/or (cost-) ineffective technologies that may be superseded by safer, more (cost-) effective technologies or those deemed to provide little health gain for the cost. Recommendations include: Disinvest (remove/reduce use of the technology), Substitute (replacement), or Innovate (better use of existing technology). AHS and AHW are collaboratively exploring the operationalization of this program. Access with Evidence Development will design and conduct “field evaluations” (including pilots and trials) that collect AHS-specific data on effectiveness and cost effectiveness of new technologies in early stages of technology development to reduce uncertainty of adoption in the province. AHW and AHS are looking at a common approach for advancing this work. Innovation will support innovations developed within and outside AHS in the areas of clinical testing, validation, data collection and value proposition within the framework of AHS priorities and needs. Knowledge Management and Translation acknowledges that the success of evidence-informed decision-making depends on the understanding and dissemination of the principles of HTA across AHS. This program will oversee strategies to disseminate project recommendations from all four programs, provide skills to use evidence through the application of the knowledge cycle, and engage stakeholders through knowledge transfer activities.
Recommendations that come from assessment, appraisals, reassessment, innovations, AED need to be shared and disseminated. We do this by: Technology briefing notes: policy, clinical question, technology description, population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, financial information, evidence. For example transient elastrography to measure liver stiffness. The operation financial impact analysis outlines the expected impact to AHS if a technology is implemented or not - specifically focusing on operational and financial implications. It provides a formalized opportunity for AHS to provide system specific information which may serve to influence provincial policy recommendations. For example Islet transplantation. Rapid, scoping, systematic reviews, HTAs (internal or external) We do not conduct assessments: we ask CADTH, IHE, uofC and UofA to do them for us
Education, skills and tools to build HTA capacity Developing interactive modules, education plan, training in HTA and KM Knowledge Cycle: A knowledge cycle is the process that knowledge passes through an organization as knowledge is identified, created, captured, shared, transferred, and utilized. I Nonaka, R Toyama, and P Byosière. (2001a). ‘A theory of organizational knowledge creation: understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge’. In Dierkes, M., Antel, A.B., Child, J. and Nonaka, I. (Eds), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 491-517.
Knowledge Transfer: A deliberate process of information exchange between producers and potential users of research that supports evidence-informed decision making and decision-informed research, ultimately for the betterment of peoples’ lives. (Research Transfer Network of Alberta website: http://www.ahfmr.ab.ca/rtna/rt.php.)
HTAI Webpage: Launched on April 1 st 2011
Knowledge Transfer: A deliberate process of information exchange between producers and potential users of research that supports evidence-informed decision making and decision-informed research, ultimately for the betterment of peoples’ lives. (Research Transfer Network of Alberta website: http://www.ahfmr.ab.ca/rtna/rt.php.)One way to do this is through communities of practice that enable use to generate and capture learnings related to HTA.Develop HTA community of practice for HTAI Satellite Units, Clinical Networks, innovation centres, HTAI, Research, Industry, CPSM, COPs capture tacit knowledge Why COPs? It captures the tacit knowledge “ The biggest information repository in most organizations sits in the heads of the people who work there, and the largest communication network is the web of conversations that binds them. Together, people, tools, and conversations—these form the “system.” Coiera, E. Interaction design theory. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2003;69:205-22
Support best and innovative practices in HTA implementation. How do we implement HTA? What are the best ways to look for technologies, innovations? Plan for horizon scanning of best practices, upcoming technologies and innovations. Innovative technologies are studies, validated and shared. Results of horizon scanning incorporated into future projects. What are we doing, how can we improve, what can we do in the future. Have an evaluation plan
Plan has been shared and is being implemented Silos do exist, people want to keep things to themselves, how do we get them to share. Biggest barrier to implementing KM practices or procedures is behaviour modification required of employees. Surgery HTAI Satellite unit was based on a local program, how do we get the other 8 clinical networks to buy in to this concept of a HTAI satellite committee. There are a lot of initiatives and things are constantly changing-is there an appetite for this or is there change fatigue? One payroll system, P2P etc Time and People to understand the application of KM/KT to HTAI
Heads or tails? HTA and KM are both required in evidence-informed decision making to managing technologies; and both will also be needed in determining future health technologies that will become part of Canada’s health care system.
Grand Canyon South Rim 7000ft, Colorado river running through it, truly inspirational We all have knowledge and access to knowledge, the key is to put this knowledge into action for the benefit of others.