This session aimed to allow the participants to have full understanding of the different formats in which the DSTs have been packaged and to see what improvements have been made to the DSTs since the last annual review meeting in Mwanza.
There were various ways of packaging the recommendations;
Smartphone app
Paper-based tools: flyers, manuals, lookup tables and maps
Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD)
Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
The smartphone app is to be downloaded from google app store. The app collects user defined variables like location, size of land, etc. asking questions in a stepwise manner and it interacts with the prediction engine on the server to provide recommendations directly on the smartphone or via SMS or email.
The paper-based tools summarize the recommendations made using most logical values for input variables and present them using tables and maps.
The USSD approach requires the user to dial in a code which will let users answer several questions to define their location, resources and other conditions and as in the smartphone app it interacts with the prediction engine to provide tailored recommendation via SMS.
The IVR method presents the same questions as in the smartphone app and USSD but in IVR users will listen to the questions and select the answer from the provided choices of numbers.
2. General approach
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
Develop and facilitate use of site-specific agronomy recommendations at scale…
Understanding of A × E interactions
(Agronomy × Environment)
Extrapolate recommendations
across target intervention area
Supply recommendations
Practical field tool
Model processes
Build prediction models
Scale the use of the tools
within partner networks
3. What process is used for tool development?
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
V0 (concept)
Literature-based
V1 (prototype)
Experimental data
V2 (pilot tool)
Validated
VF (ready tool)
N x validated
2016 2017 2018 2019
4. Validation exercises – pilot study
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
Validation requires many, simple evaluations of the recommendations.
1. Functional validation
2. Architectural validation
5. electronic tools
Paper-based tools
The format and “look and feel” of the tools
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
Various ways of packaging the recommendations…
questionnaire
maps
decision trees
budget tables
desktop software
smartphone app
USSD
interactive
voice
response
Radio +
SMS
6. Happier customers: Interactive Voice Response
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
DEMO available from VIAMO (www.viamo.com):
Dial +234 813 986 1022; you will be disconnected, then receive a call.
7. Full flexibility: a smartphone app
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
Demo version 1.0.8 available on:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.masgeek.fertilizerestimate
8. Simpler but still digital: USSD
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
Check it out on:
https://simulator.africastalking.com:1517/ Use USSD code *384*6142#
9. Full circle: back to paper
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
12. KEY QUESTIONS
In what format / how do DSTs best fit within DPs strategy?
What are EAs preferences and capacity to work with DSTs?
What are HHs capacity and willingness to apply DST advice?
www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
13. www.iita.org | www.cgiar.org | www.acai-project.org
Thank you!
Questions?
Funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation