This document provides an introduction to systematic literature reviews. It defines what a systematic literature review is, differentiates it from traditional reviews, and outlines the key stages in conducting an SLR. A SLR uses a systematic and comprehensive approach to minimize bias by documenting an a priori protocol. The stages discussed are formulating the research question, carrying out searches, selecting studies, extracting data, assessing risk of bias, synthesizing evidence, and defining the protocol. History and rationale for using SLRs to summarize research evidence rigorously are also presented.
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Introduction to systematic literature review
1. Introduction to systematic literature review
Nicholas Ngwili, ILRI
Online Training on Systematic Literature Review, ILRI Nairobi, 5-6 May 2020
2. Learning outcomes at the end of the
training
Describe what is SLR and their rationale
Differentiate SLR and traditional reviews
Formulate the research question and write a SLR
protocol- we will discuss a few examples
Carry out all the stages of a SLR – 6 stages
3. What is SLR
A review prepared using a systematic approach to
minimizing biases and random errors which is
documented in a material and methods section in
an a priori protocol. This is what makes a review
systematic
4. SLRs
Require comprehensive search of all evidence
Systematic reviews are observational studies – therefore also
prone to bias
Should apply the same level of rigour to reviewing research
evidence as is used producing that research evidence in the
first place.
5. Def’ continued…
A systematic review may, or may not, include a meta-analysis:
a statistical analysis of the results, which generally aim to
produce a single estimate of an intervention effect
Represented in a forest plot
The examination of variability or heterogeneity in study
results is also a critical outcome
6. History
In 1975 under the term 'meta analysis'. The phrase was
coined by Gene Glass who conducted syntheses in the areas
of psychotherapy (Smith, Glass and Miller 1980) and class size
(Glass and Smith 1979).
Archie Cochrane in 1972 urged health practitioners to practice
evidence-based medicine
7. History
In 1987, the year before Cochrane died, he referred
systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCT's) a
real milestone in the history of randomised trials and in the
evaluation of care, and suggested that other specialties
should copy the methods used
The Cochrane Collaboration in 1993- international network of
researchers, academics, practitioners and users
The Campbell collaboration adapted Cochrane methodology
to bring the same quality of systematic evidence to issues of
broader public policy.
8. Why SLR?
Researchers cannot read all relevant literature!
Lack of time, resources and skills-find, appraise and interpret
Often lots of studies sometimes with conflicting findings
Systematic reviews summarise the evidence
For relevant questions about important uncertainties in a
particular topic
- Systematic reviews are very powerful tools but are poorly
understood
10. Traditional Literatures vs SLR
Traditional reviews Systematic literature review
Are descriptive,
Involve a non- systematic search
of literature
Are selective – one chooses to
read what is available, is of
interest
Can sometimes be confusing
where similar studies provide
different results and conclusions.
It is prone to bias.
Involve using a clear, well defined
methodology to summarize past
research, with a focus to reduce
bias.
May include a meta- analysis
where data from different
studies is pooled together an a
summary provided
Rich in data to inform further
research or methodology.
11. Characteristics of systematic reviews
o A clearly stated set of objectives with pre-defined eligibility
criteria for studies;
o An explicit, reproducible methodology;
o A systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that
meet the eligibility criteria;
o An assessment of the validity of the findings of the included
studies, for example through the assessment of risk of bias; and
o A systematic presentation, and synthesis, of the characteristics
and findings of the included studies
12. Stages in SLR
Define your research question and inclusion criteria
Carry out comprehensive, systematic searches
Select eligible studies
Extract data
Assess risk of bias in included studies
Synthesise the evidence
13. The protocol- defines the process in detail
Have protocol written down and possibly reviewed
Define question and search strategies
Define Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Quality control
Extract data: primary outcomes, populations and interventions
Protocols can be registered;
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
14. Types of SLR
o Comparative Effectiveness Research -what works best
o Diagnostic test accuracy
o Prognosis
o EPOC and Health systems - Effective Practice and Organisation of Care
o Qualitative research
o Cost effectiveness and health economics
o Genomics
o Social science and the Campbell Collaboration
15. Comparative Effectiveness Research
• Randomised controlled trials
• Non-randomised and pseudo-randomised
• Observational studies - no allocation but with a comparator or
control group
• Large outcome studies or real world data - big data
• Case series - sequential or selected
18. This presentation is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
better lives through livestock
ilri.org
ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions
to the CGIAR Trust Fund
Notas del editor
There MUST be a CGIAR logo or a CRP logo. You can copy and paste the logo you need from the final slide of this presentation. Then you can delete that final slide
To replace a photo above, copy and paste this link in your browser: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ilri/sets/72157632057087650/detail/
Find a photo you like and the right size, copy and paste it in the block above.