Mr. Mohammad Suleman Secretary (Energy), Govt. of Madhya Pradesh at RPR 2012, 23-26 August, Goa, India

1. Feeder Separation Project
Mohammed Suleman
Secretary Energy, GoMP
August 2012

2. Goal of Power Sector
 To provide 24 Hours supply to every willing household in
the State by FY 13.
 To ensure continuous 8 hours quality supply to
Agricultural consumers through separate feeders by FY 13.

3. Challenges
 Accurate Demand projection
 Availability to meet demand
 Transmission Network Strengthening
 Distribution System Strengthening
 Commercial viability of operations

4. Commercial Scenario
 AT&C losses
• Reduction in last 5 years – About 10%
• Current AT&C loss level – 31.62% (excluding
transmission losses)
• Transmission losses – 3.51%
 Share of Agriculture Consumption - 30%
 Tariff Subsidy - Rs.1925 crore (FY 12)
 Percentage recovery from Agriculture (net of
Govt. subsidy) – 50%
 RPU & ACoS Gap - Rs.1.03 per unit (FY 12)

5. Proposed Solution
 Separation of 11kV feeders for domestic and
agricultural use in rural areas.

6. Objectives of FSP
“To provide commercially viable continuous
supply of electricity in rural habitations while
ensuring sufficient supply for agricultural use to
promote sustainable exploitation of ground
water, thereby to accelerate socio-economic
development of rural areas.”

7. Benefits of FSP
 Better quality & reliability of power supply due to separate 11kV feeders and
System strengthening.
 Reduction in AT&C losses:
• Prevention of theft / Direct hooking from LT network catering to non-agricultural
load;
• Reduction in technical losses; and
• Restricted supply hours to agricultural pumps.
 Reduction in Equipment failure.
 Water Conservation with restricted hours of required power supply to
agricultural pumps.
 Round the clock power supply would encourage development of rural
industries.
 Improvement in Livelihood Index due to accessibility of power for 24 hours in
rural areas.

8. No of Feeders require Separation
Name of Company Feeders to be Feeders covered Feeders
Separated RGGVY & Old covered under
schemes Feeder
Separation
Scheme
No. No. No.
East 1891 246 1645
Central 1729 395 1334
West 2642 315 2327
State 6262 956 5306

9. Scope of Feeder Separation Project
Central West
Particulars Unit East Discom State
Discom Discom
33 kV S/s No 0 169 65 234
11 kV new
Kms 37138 17571 16979 71688
line
DTR No 28504 32553 24640 85697
HVDS Kms 0 6438 5916 12354
Conversion
Kms 21487 15000 20503 56990
to AB Cable
Meter No 587701 751269 596285 1935255
No of
No 1645 1334 2327 5306
Feeders
No of
No 15860 15745 10837 42442
Villages

10. Project Cost of Feeder Separation
Cost (Rs in Cr)
Other
Schemes
1st Phase (REC) 2nd Phase(ADB)
(RGGVY &
Name
Old ADB) Total
of the Cost
Discom
Distt. Distt.
No. of Cost No. of Cost No of
(in (in Cost
feeders feeders Feeders
No.) No.)
East 9 708 765.88 8 937 1012.32 280 119.37 1897.57
Central 7 516 427.13 9 818 717.88 376 510.80 1655.81
West 7 1209 528.26 7 1118 699.11 451 377.00 1604.37
State 23 2433 1721.27 24 2873 2429.31 1107 1007.17 5157.70
For the 1st Phase, Loan is sanctioned by REC Ltd.
For the 2nd Phase, Loan is sanctioned by ADB.

11. Project Methodology
• District-wise turnkey contracts for construction
• No material supply by the Discoms
• Contractor to design the system and approval by Independent
Engineer
• Construction supervision by Independent Engineering firm
• Concurrent supervision by Discom officers
• Centralized Project Management at Corporate offices
• Contractor to ensure loss level below 12% post completion at DTR
level

12. Procurement Strategy (1/3)
 Bid documents were prepared in advance
 Contractor conferences were organized
• Delhi (04.08.2010,No of participants-35)
• Hyderabad (05.08.2010, No of participants-32)
• Mumbai (09.08.2010, No of participants-31)
 Independent supervision- First time concept of PMC
introduced in the Discoms for better monitoring, quality
control & timely completion of the project.
• PMC for Phase-I: M/s Feedback Ventures Pvt. Ltd. for all 3
Discoms
• PMC for Phase-II: M/s UR Scott Wilson for West & East Discoms
M/s ICT Pvt. Ltd. for Central Discom

13. Procurement Strategy (2/3)
 Transparent process:
• National level publicity by arranging conferences in metro/ Tier-I cities;
• Publication in national newspapers; and
• Publicity through website of the Discoms.
 Competition: Bids received
Discom Max. Nos. Min. Nos. Average
East 27 4 13
Central 24 6 12
West 23 6 14
 Award:
Discom No of Contracts Awarded
East 29
Central 19
West 26

14. Procurement Strategy (3/3)
 Time taken in the process (Issue of NIT to LoA)
Discom Phase-I Phase-II
East 3 months 6 months
Central 4.5 months 5 months
West 4 months 5.5 months
 Some Names of contractors
• West Discom- M/s. Hythro Power Ltd. Gurgaon, M/s Aster Tele
Services Hyderabad, M/s Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. New Delhi, M/s
UbiTech Ltd. Faridabad, M/s NCC Ltd, M/s Vishwa Infrastructures
Services P. Ltd. M/s Megha Engg & Infra Ltd.–KEPCO(JV), M/s
Vishwanath Project Ltd., etc.
• East Discom- Aster, Godrej, KMG, Era, ARK, Ramky, Kepco Korea,
A2Z, Eltel, GET Power, New Modern, UB Engg.
• Central Discom- M/s KEI, Godrej, GET,NCC,Jyoti structure, Shyam
Indus, AMRCL.

15. PROGRESS OF FEEDER SEPARATION WORK UP
TO JULY 2012
Discom Total no. of Cumulative progress of %
feeder to be feeder separated up to achievement
separated 31st July 2012
in all
scheme
No. of Total
feeders villages
East 1891 617 4227 33%
Central 1729 578 3848 33%
West 2642 874 2665 33%
Total 6262 2069 10740 33%

16. Final Results (Expected)
State
After Feeder Increase
Particulars Existing
Separation
No %
33kV S/s 2638 2872 234 9%
Length of 11kV
216488 288176 71688 33%
Lines in Km
Cable (Kms) 9560 69677 60117 629%
No of DTRs 302502 388199 85697 28%
Meter 6084683 8109417 2024774 33%
No of rural
domestic
40.22 50.45 10.23 25%
Consumers (in
lakhs)

17. Sample Results
S. Particulars AT&C Loss %
No. Before After
FSP FSP
1 11 KV Bhaitari feeder 39.90 29.50
2 11 KV Kusmi feeder 49.47 31.45
3 11KV Surkhi feeder 64.55 4.71
4 11KV Sehora feeder 85.13 15.87
5 11KV Mugalia Chhap & Kodia feeder 79.00 29.00
6 Distribution Centre Harsola (8 feeders) 69.45 9.78
7 Distn.Centre Teesgaon (14 feeders) 50.50 38.32
8 Dhar Circle (154feeders) 48.57 38.30
9 Distn.Centre Jaora (R) (4 feeders) 57.91 14.90
10 Distn.Centre Uplai (12 feeders) 66.10 29.21

18. Thanks

19. Sample Results - East Discom (1/3)
SN Name of Name of Name of 11KV feeder No. of Input in Unit Demand Collection T&D Loss % AT&C
Divsiion the consumer LU Sold in in efficiency %Loss
33/11KV LU Rs.lacs %
Sub-station
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14
O&M Sidhi Kothiya Data before
commencement of
FS 478 0.52 0.3 0.72 104.17 42.31 39.90
Data after
completion of FS
1 Bhitari 669 0.65 0.52 1.01 88.12 20.00 29.50
Percentage change
39.96 25.00 73.33 40.28 -15.41 -22.31 -10.40
O&M Sidhi Kusmi Data before
commencement of
FS 440 0.5 0.33 1.41 75.89 33.41 49.47
Data after
completion of FS
3 Kusmi 504 0.33 0.28 1.56 80.13 14.45 31.45
Percentage change
14.55 -34.00 -15.21 10.64 5.59 -18.96 -18.02
Back

20. Sample Results - East Discom (2/3)
Name of Town/DC/FS 11KV SURKHI FEEDER (SAGAR CIRCLE)
S. FY Input Unit Sold Unit Billing T&D Demand Coll. Effi. AT&C RPU
No. (LU) (LU) Eff. % Loss % (Rs. in Collection % Loss % Rs./Unit
lakh) (Rs. in
lakh)
2009-10
1 18.12 7.80 44.15 55.85 7.85 6.30 80.30 64.55 0.35
(BEFORE FS)
2011-12
5 10.04 8.65 82.88 13.86 31.54 34.89 110.63 4.71 3.48
(AFTER FS)
Percentage
-44.61 8.08 38.73 -41.99 453.87 30.33 -59.84 894%
change
Back

21. Sample Results - East Discom (3/3)
Name of Town/DC/FS 11kv SEHORA FEEDER (Sagar Circle)
S. FY Input Sold Unit Billing T&D Demand (Rs. Collection Coll. AT&C RPU
No. Unit (LU) Eff. % Loss % in lakh) (Rs. in Effi. % Loss % Rs./U
(LU) lakh) nit
2009-10
1 5.73 1.00 17.43 82.57 21.30 18.17 85.33 85.13 3.17
(BEFORE FS)
2011-12
5 9.89 8.27 83.63 16.37 35.62 35.83 100.60 15.87 3.62
(AFTER FS)
%Change 72.45 727.32 66.20 -66.20 67.23 97.15 15.27 -69.26 14%
Back

22. Sample Results - Central Discom
T&D AND AT&C LOSSES OF 11 KV MUGALIYA CHHAP AND 11KV KODIA FEEDER JOINTLY
(A) BEFORE FEEDER SEPERATION
Demand
Sold
No. of Input in T&D Rs in Collection Collection Billing AT&C
Month Unit in RPU
Cons. LU loss% Lakhs Rs in Lakhs efficiency efficiency loss%
LU
Apr-12 721 4.25 1.08 74.59 1.78 1.46 82% 25% 79% 0.34
(B) AFTER FEEDER SEPERATION
Demand
Collection
No. of Input in Sold Unit T&D Rs in Collection Billing AT&C
Month Rs in Lakhs RPU
Cons. LU in LU loss% Lakhs efficiency efficiency loss%
Jun-12 2473 4.37 3.29 24.71 9.84 9.25 94% 75% 29% 2.12
Differen
243 3 284 (-)49.88 453 534 12% 50% (-)50% 523
ce in %
Back

23. Sample Results - West Discom (1/5)
AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTRES- HARSOLA
Total No. of 11 kV feeders-8 Village Covered- 3
11 KV feeders separated- 8 Village Benefitted- 3
Sold unit in Demand in Collection Billing Collection AT&C
Year Input in lacs RPU
Lacs Lacs in Lacs Eff. Eff. Losses
2010-11 114.98 79.51 170.76 160.58 69.15 94.04 34.97 1.4
2011-12 130.29 98.19 210.88 224.33 75.36 106.38 19.83 1.7
Growth in 2011- 13.32 23.49 23.49 39.70 6.21 12.34 -15.14 0.33
12 Compare to
2010-11
Upto June-2011 36.29 13.89 35.44 28.28 38.28 79.80 69.45 0.8
Upto June-2012 23.78 18.39 55.71 64.99 77.33 116.66 9.78 2.7
Difference
-12.51 4.5 20.27 36.71 39.06 36.86 59.67 1.95
Growth in June- -34.47 32.40 57.20 129.81 39.06 36.86 -59.67 250.71
12 compare to
June-2011 in %
Back

24. Sample Results - West Discom (2/5)
AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTRES - TEESGAON
Villages
Total No.of 11 KV Feeders :- 14 Covered :- 29
Villages
Benefitted :-
11 KV Feeders Separated :- 14 29
Sold unit in Collection in
Year Input in lacs Demand in Lacs Collection Eff. Demand unit RPU AT&C Loss
Lacs Lacs
2010-11 235.93 132.83 249.55 254.39 101.94 57.39 1.06 43.70
2011-12 251.17 156.34 338.95 323.67 95.49 59.44 1.35 37.76
Growth in 2011- 6.46 17.70 35.82 27.23 -6.45 2.05 0.29 -5.94
12 compare to
2010-11
Upto JUNE 2011
45.28 20.15 44.36 40.86 92.11 40.99 0.98 55.50
Upto JUNE 2012
43.09 26.58 66.89 62.03 92.73 57.20 1.55 38.32
Numeric
Difference in
JUNE 12 -2.19 6.43 22.53 21.17 0.62 16.21 0.57 -17.18
compare to JUNE
11
Growth in JUNE -4.84 31.91 50.79 51.81 0.62 39.55 58.45 -17.18
2012 compear to
JUNE 2011 in %
Back

25. Sample Results - West Discom (3/5)
AN ANALYSIS OF - DHAR CIRCLE
Total No.of 11 KV Feeders :- 244 Villages Covered :- 1337
11 KV Feeders Separated :- 154 Villages Benefitted :-483
Sold unit in Demand in Collection in Collection
Year Input in lacs Billing Eff. RPU AT&C Loss
Lacs Lacs Lacs Eff.
2009-10
749.00 466.55 12120.55 12215.23 62.29 100.78 1.62 37.71
2010-11 832.37 537.66 15289.52 14834.17 64.59 97.02 1.84 35.41
2011-12 1034.67 695.67 20110.84 19147.58 67.24 95.21 1.94 32.76
Growth in 2010- 11.13 15.24 26.15 21.44 2.30 -3.76 0.22 -2.30
11 compare to
2009-10
Growth in 2011- 24.30 29.39 31.53 29.08 2.64 -1.81 0.11 -2.64
12 compare to
2010-11
Upto June 2011
210.74 108.39 3708.84 3290.76 51.43 88.73 1.76 48.57
Upto June 2012
222.43 137.24 4991.96 4666.90 61.70 93.49 2.24 38.30
Growth in June 5.55 26.62 34.60 41.82 10.27 4.76 0.48 -10.27
2012 compear to
June 2011
Back

26. Sample Results - West Discom (4/5)
AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTERS -JAORA(R)
Total No. of 11 KV Feeders -: 4 Villages Covered-: 17
11 KV Feeders Separated-: 4 Villages Benefitted-:17
Sold unit in Demand in Collection Collection Demand
Year Input in lacs Billing Eff. RPU % loss AT&C Loss
Lacs Lacs in Lacs Eff. unit
2009-10 212.44 138.91 275.59 226.78 65.39% 82.29% 1.3 1.07 34.61% 46.19%
2010-11 205.3 145.2 292.83 266.45 70.73% 90.99% 1.43 1.3 29.27% 35.65%
2011-12 217.66 167.28 381.16 367.82 76.85% 96.50% 1.75 1.69 23.15% 25.84%
Growth in
2010-11
-3.36% 4.53% 6.26% 17.49% 5.34% 8.70% 0.13 0.23 -5.34% -10.55%
compare
to 2009-10
Growth in
2011-12
6.02% 15.21% 30.16% 38.04% 6.13% 5.51% 0.32 0.39 -6.13% -9.81%
compare
to 2010-11
Up to
35.65 19.21 48.91 38.2 53.88% 78.10% 1.37 1.07 46.12% 57.91%
May-2011
Up to
32.39 26.78 64.52 66.41 82.68% 102.93% 1.99 2.05 17.32% 14.90%
May-2012
Growth
in May-
2012
-9.14% 39.41% 31.92% 73.85% 28.79% 24.83% 0.62 0.98 -28.79% -43.02%
compare
to May-
2011 Back

27. Sample Results - West Discom (5/5)
AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTERS - UPLAI
Total No. of 11 KV Feeders -: 12 Villages Covered-: 29
11 KV Feeders Separated-: 12 Villages Benefitted-:29
Sold unit in Demand in Collection in Demand
Year Input in lacs Billing Eff. Collection Eff. RPU % loss AT&C Loss
Lacs Lacs Lacs unit
2009-10 274.4 145.42 304.91 264.11 53.00% 86.62% 1.11 0.96 47.00% 54.10%
2010-11 303.38 173.78 366.89 314.47 57.28% 85.71% 1.21 1.04 42.72% 50.90%
2011-12 348.53 186.76 422.8 429.55 53.59% 101.60% 1.21 1.23 46.41% 45.56%
Growth in
2010-11
10.56% 19.50% 20.33% 19.07% 4.29% -0.91% 0.1 0.07 -4.29% -3.19%
compare to
2009-10
Growth in
2011-12
14.88% 7.47% 15.24% 36.59% -3.70% 15.88% 0 0.2 3.70% -5.34%
compare to
2010-11
Up to May-
59.07 22.81 54.98 48.26 38.62% 87.78% 0.93 0.82 61.38% 66.10%
2011
Up to May-
51.48 25.77 59.93 84.75 50.06% 141.41% 1.16 1.65 49.94% 29.21%
2012
Growth in
May-2012
compeart -12.85% 12.98% 9.00% 75.61% 11.44% 53.64% 0.23 0.83 -11.44% -36.89%
to May-
2011
Back