Infrastructure requirements for open scholarship – Jisc and CNI conference 10 July 2014
1. Infrastructure requirements for open scholarship
Neil Jacobs
Head of Scholarly Communications Support
E n.jacobs@jisc.ac.uk
M 0784 195 1303
Skype neil.jacobs1
Twitter @njneilj
One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA
4. Open Access: new roles
Author
Publisher
Agent
Discovery
service
University
Author
University
Publisher
Intermediary
Discovery
service
University
??
??
??
From this…
To this??
University
Research
funder
University
5. Open Access: what do universities need to know?
How do I know what authors from my
institution have published?
How do I know what papers from authors at
my institution have been submitted to
journals?
How do I know what papers from authors at
my institution have accepted in journals?
How do I know what my institution has paid
for OA publications?
How do I know whether my institution /
authors have complied with funder policies?
Potential financial liabilities
Potential compliance issues
Actual financial liabilities
Actual compliance issues
Payments to be made
Compliance to be checked
Financial management
Reporting to funders
Reporting to funders
Research assessment
6. Open Access: what do authors need to know?
How do I pay to publish Gold OA if
required?
How do I know where I would prefer to
publish?
How do I know what obligations I have
under institutional and funder OA policies?
How do I deposit into a repository if
required?
How do I know whether I have complied
with funder policies?
Career implications
Institutional penalties
Funder penalties
Otherwise I might have to
use my research funds
Otherwise my paper might
not be eligible for REF
Reporting to funders
Research assessment
7. Open Access: public and private events
Each stakeholder needs certain information at
particular times
Some of that information is held by others
Some of that information might not be easily
shareable:
• It might be confidential (private, commercial, etc)
• It might be difficult or costly to share
• Standards for sharing it might not be established
9. Data Management
Planning:
DMP-Online
Journal data policy
information service
Research data
registry and
discovery service
Dissemination
platforms, eg
Figshare
Curation platforms, eg
Arkivum, Dryad,
institutional archives,
GenBank, etc
Identifier
services, eg
DataCite
Research
data
10. Research Data Management:
public and private events
• Data management plan marks beginning of
data life cycle
• Collaboration—sharing data with other
researchers
• Publication—releasing data into the public
domain
– Potential for cross-disciplinary use
– Need for additional metadata
11. Create Submit Accept Deposit Publish Read Use
Pay APC Check compliance Make discoverable
Publisher
manuscript
system
Institutional
repository /
CRIS
Subject repository
Publications
Router
Sherpa
RoMEO,
Juliet, FACT
Publisher
finance
system
Institutional
finance /
CRIS
Publisher
publication
platform
Jisc Monitor / SHARE notification (monitoring events)
CrossRef
OA
aggregation
OpenDOAR
(directory of
repositories)
DOAJ
ORCID
OpenAIRE
IRUS-UK
(usage
reports)
Funders
FundRef
ISSN
Publisher
policies
RIOXX
Preservation
services
Discovery
services
Back to OA
Events…
12. Create Submit Accept Deposit Publish Read Use
Pay APC Check compliance Make discoverable
Publisher
manuscript
system
Institutional
repository /
CRIS
Subject repository
Publications
Router
Sherpa
RoMEO,
Juliet, FACT
Publisher
finance
system
Institutional
finance /
CRIS
Publisher
publication
platform
Jisc Monitor / SHARE notification (monitoring events)
CrossRef
OA
aggregation
OpenDOAR
(directory of
repositories)
DOAJ
ORCID
OpenAIRE
IRUS-UK
(usage
reports)
Funders
FundRef
ISSN
Publisher
policies
RIOXX
Preservation
services
Discovery
services
Back to OA
Events…
13. Create Submit Accept Deposit Publish Read Use
Pay APC Check compliance Make discoverable
Publisher
manuscript
system
Institutional
repository /
CRIS
Subject repository
Publications
Router
Sherpa
RoMEO,
Juliet, FACT
Publisher
finance
system
Institutional
finance /
CRIS
Publisher
publication
platform
Jisc Monitor / SHARE notification (monitoring events)
CrossRef
OA
aggregation
OpenDOAR
(directory of
repositories)
DOAJ
ORCID
OpenAIRE
IRUS-UK
(usage
reports)
Funders
FundRef
ISSN
Publisher
policies
RIOXX
Preservation
services
Discovery
services
Back to OA
Events…
17. Open Access: public and private events
• We are identifying and characterising the
events and associated metadata
• Current focus is on:
– Acceptance – a newly ‘public’ event
– APC payment – a new event
– Publication – an event with a new importance
18. Researchers: ORCID
Organisations: (CASRAI OrgID working group)
Funders: FundRef
Publishers: ?
Journals: ISSN
Articles: CrossRef, NISO OA metadata, NISO/ALPSP versions, V4OA
Journal OA policies: Sherpa-RoMEO
Funder OA policies: Sherpa-Juliet, ROARMAP, Melibea, PASTEUR4OA
Repositories: OpenDOAR, ISSN ROAD?
Licences: ONIX-PL, Creative Commons
Usage statistics COUNTER, (P)IRUS
APCs ?????
Research data, software…
To come: relationships -
• Attribution
• Contribution
• Affiliation
• Citation
…
Open Access: standards and identifiers
Some of these are standards,
curated through established
standards bodies.
But some of these are services,
which need ongoing support
To what extent can these support an “event-
based” approach?
19. …
Open Access infrastructure sustainability
Knowledge Exchange international programme exploring options:
Phase One: scoping and engagement (Alma Swan, Key Perspectives Ltd)
• What are the critical services?
• Are they needed for ever or for now?
• How “at risk” are they?
Phase Two: business models for collective provision of services (Raym
Crow, SPARC)
• How can collective action be made to support free-to-use services?
Phase Three: tools for funders and service providers, and next steps (Alma
Swan)
• The sustainability index
• Engagement with funders, others…
20. …
Open Access infrastructure sustainability
Knowledge Exchange international programme exploring options:
Phase One: scoping and engagement (Alma Swan, Key Perspectives Ltd)
• What are the critical services?
• Are they needed for ever or for now?
• How “at risk” are they?
Phase Two: business models for collective provision of services (Raym
Crow, SPARC)
• How can collective action be made to support free-to-use services?
Phase Three: tools for funders and service providers, and next steps (Alma
Swan)
• The sustainability index
• Engagement with funders, others…
OA as a policy requirement…
21. …
Open Access infrastructure sustainability
Some thoughts from the view of a national infrastructure provider
1. Funders of research, and of infrastructure, are never global. At best they are
regional (eg EC), usually they are national or consortium
• But scholarly communications is intrinsically global, and so its services are
global (cf CrossRef)
2. Sometimes we don’t know something will become a service until people start
using it as one.
• There has to be room for innovation, and therefore “graceful failure”
• But there has to be somewhere to take global services when it becomes
clear they are meeting demand
3. Coordination is difficult for national bodies
• Different rules on funding, different funding cycles and instruments, different
constituents…
4. Coordination might be easier between services
• combining their functionality, to present infrastructure / funders with
consolidated offers, based on use cases they care about
22. Thank you
Neil Jacobs
Head of Scholarly Communications Support
E n.jacobs@jisc.ac.uk
M 0784 195 1303
Skype neil.jacobs1
Twitter @njneilj
One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA
Comments?
Questions?
Notas del editor
Add Jisc research lifecycle
Add Jisc research lifecycle
And DataCite
And RD Dataset registry and discovery – UK Data Discovery