SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 58
Chapter-09
Masonry Structures under
later loads
Siddharth shankar
Department of Civil(structure)
Engineering
Pulchowk Campus
Earthquake
 Earthquake cause shaking of ground, so a building resting on
it will experience motion at its base.
 The roof has a tendency to stay in its original position and the
roof experiences a force, called inertia force.
 Inertia force is the multiplication of the weight and the
acceleration, so larger the weight of the building more the
earthquake shaking.
Engineering representation of
earthquake force
Masonry Structures
Masonry is brittle and tensile and shear
strength is very low.
Due to Large mass of masonry structures,
heavy weight attracts large amounts of seismic
forces.
Wall to wall connection and roof connection is
generally weak.
Stress concentration occurs at the corners of
windows and doors.
 Out of plane failure
 In plane failure
 Diaphragm failure
 Connection Failure
 Failure due to opening of wall
 Pounding
 Non-structural component failure
Failure Modes of a Masonry buildings
Out of Plane Failure
The Earthquake force is
perpendicular to the plane.
The wall tends to overturn or bend.
This causes the partial or full
collapse of the wall.
This is due to Inadequate anchorage
of wall and roof , long and slender
wall, etc.
Characterized by vertical cracks at
corner, cracks at lintel, roof level and
gable wall, etc.
In Plane Failure
The Earthquake force is parallel to the plane
The wall is shear off or bend
X- cracks occurs
Characterized by vertical cracks at wall intersection,
separation of corners of two walls, spalling of
materials, etc
Diaphragm Failure
 Lack of anchoring produce a push of diaphragm against the
wall.
 Absence of good shear transfer between diaphragms and
reaction wall accounts for damage at corner of wall
 Rare phenomenon in the event of seismic motion
 Separation of wall and diaphragm cause collapse of buildings
Connection failure
 For given direction of earthquake, wall A acts as a shear
wall and B acts as flexure wall.
 If the walls are not tied together wall B overturn (out of
olane) and wall A slides (in plane) and collapse occurs.
 Masonry units should tied properly
Failure due to opening in walls
 Opening will obstruct the flow of forces from one wall to
another.
 Large opening in shear wall reduces the strength of wall
against the inertia forces.
 Results diagonal cracks in the areas of masonry between
opening and cracks at the level of opening.
 Thus, openings should small and away from corners.
Pounding
 When the roofs of two adjacent buildings are at different
levels, during earthquake, two buildings strike against each
other is called pounding.
 Pounding results into cracking of the wall.
Non Structural components failure
Falling of plaster from walls and ceiling.
Cracking and overturning of parapets,
chimneys, etc.
Cracking and overturning of partition walls.
Cracking of glasses.
Falling of loosely placed objects.
Ductile behaviour of reinforced & unreinforced masonry
 It is the capacity of an element or structure to undergo large
deformation without failure.
 Masonry is brittle in nature.
 Ductility of masonry structure is governed by the ductility
of masonry units & properties of mortar.
 Unreinforced masonry cannot withstand tension so cracks
develops.
 In-plane & out-of-plane failure is also due to ductility of
masonry.
 To improve ductility reinforcing bars are embedded in the
masonry, called reinforced masonry which can resist the
seismic force more than unreinforced masonry.
Brittle and Ductile force-deformation behavior
Brittle
Ductile
Δy Δu
Deformation
1. Walls tend to tear apart.
2. Walls tend to shear off diagonally in direction.
3. Failure at corners of walls
4. Walls tend to collapse
5. Failure at corners of openings
6. Hammering/pounding between two adjacent
buildings
7. Separation of thick wall into two layers
8.Separation on unconnected wall at junction
9.Seperation of wall from roof
 Non-integrity of wall floor and roof.
 Configuration – irregularity of building causes
torsional effect.
 Large opening of the building.
 Inappropriate position of opening.
 Lack of cross wall in large length of wall.
 Lack of reinforcement make the masonry building
brittle.
 Pounding effect.
 Lack of anchoring element between two walls.
Major causes of failure of masonry buildings
Elements of Lateral Load
Resisting Masonry
System
Horizontal bands for integrity
Connecting peripheral walls for
structural robustness and integrity
 Plinth band
 Lintel band
 Roof band
 Gable band
Roof structure
Light and strong roof is
desirable.
Secure tiles/slates or use GI
sheets.
Good jointing in trusses
Concrete floors in 1:2:4
concrete with reinforcement
in both directions and bend
up near supports.
Overall arrangement of masonry structure
Chapter-10
Testing of masonry
elements
siddharth shankar
Pulchowk Campus
Department of Civil Engineering
Compressive Strength of Bricks and wall
Testing of Wall in compression
Diagonal Shear Test
Normally carried out:
1. Periodically to evaluate the performance of
building
2.To gather information on old building in
order to ascertain the methods of repair or
to demolish
3. To ascertain the strength of concrete if
cube tests failed.
NON DESTRUCTIVE TEST (NDT)
 Elastic wave tomography
 Rebound Hammer / Schmidt Hammer
 Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
 Impact Echo Test
 X-Rays
 Flat Jack Test
Elastic wave tomography
 Technique used for locating shallow delaminations,
cracks, and voids.
 Elastic wave tomography is based on two basic
principles from heat transfer: conduction and
radiation. Sound materials with no voids, gaps, or
cracks are more thermally conductive than materials
that are delaminated or contain moisture.
 This allows rapid areal mapping of internal
conditions. It should be noted that the IT method is
most useful for the detection of shallow defects and
flaws.
 Tests For: Voids, Cracks, Moisture.
Rebound Method
 Can be used to determine the in-place compressive
strength of concrete within a range of 1500 – 8000 psi
(10-55MPa)
 A quick and simple mean of checking concrete
uniformity.
 Measure the distance of rebound of a spring-loaded
plunger after it struck a smooth concrete surface.
 Results of the test can be affected by factors such as
smoothness of concrete surface, size, shape, rigidity of
specimen, age & moisture condition.
 Type of coarse aggregate & the carbonation of the
surface.
Nondestructive Test
Re-bound hammer Method
Nondestructive Test Methods
 Rebound Hammer Tests
 Schmidt Hammer
 Rebound Method Using Rebound Hammer
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
 It uses measurement of the speed of ultrasonic
pulses through the concrete to correlate concrete
strength to standard strength.
 Allows the determination of compressive concrete
strength and location of cracks.
 It will identify non homogenous condition in the
structure such as honeycomb, voids and cracks.
 Size of cracks can also be determined.
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
Flat Jack Test
 Flat jack testing is a nondestructive test of
evaluating existing masonry structure. It does
not require removal of masonry units - only
the removal of small portions of mortar is
enough. The flat jack test uses small, thin,
hydraulic jacks to apply a force to a section of
an existing masonry wall, and the method
uses measuring devices to determine the
resulting displacement of the masonry.
Flat jack testing has many useful applications:
 It can be used to determine masonry
compressive modulus, which is the stress/strain
relationship of the masonry, or axial stress by
applying axial load and measuring resulting axial
deformation.
 It can be used to estimate compressive strength
and measure the shear strength.
 If the destruction of the masonry units is
acceptable, it can be used to directly measure the
compressive strength by testing the masonry to
Flat-Jack Test
Push Shear Test
 Prepare the test location by removing the brick,
including the mortar, on one side of the brick to be
tested. The head joint on the opposite side of the
brick to be tested is also removed. Care must be
exercised so that the mortar joint above or below the
brick to be tested is not damaged.
 The hydraulic ram is inserted in the space where the
brick was removed. A steel loading block is placed
between the ram and the brick to be tested so that the
ram will distribute its load over the end face of the
brick. The dial gauge can also be inserted in the
space.
Push Shear Test
 The brick is then loaded with the ram until the
first indication of cracking or movement of
the brick.
 The ram force and associated deflection on
the dial gauge are recorded to develop a
force-deflection plot on which the first
cracking or movement should be indicated. A
dial gauge can be used to calculate a rough
estimate of shear stiffness
Push Shear Test
Masonry structures -_chapter_9_and_10

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Failures In Masonry Structures Lec 1
Failures In Masonry Structures Lec 1Failures In Masonry Structures Lec 1
Failures In Masonry Structures Lec 1
Teja Ande
 
footing
footingfooting
footing
illpa
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

earthquake resistant ppt
earthquake resistant pptearthquake resistant ppt
earthquake resistant ppt
 
Retaining wall
 Retaining wall  Retaining wall
Retaining wall
 
Seismic Retrofitting Techniques
Seismic Retrofitting TechniquesSeismic Retrofitting Techniques
Seismic Retrofitting Techniques
 
DEEP FOUNDATION
DEEP FOUNDATIONDEEP FOUNDATION
DEEP FOUNDATION
 
Earthquake resistant building
Earthquake resistant buildingEarthquake resistant building
Earthquake resistant building
 
Shallow foundation
Shallow foundationShallow foundation
Shallow foundation
 
Base isolation of structures
Base isolation of structures Base isolation of structures
Base isolation of structures
 
Chapter 4 repair, rehabilitation & retrofiiting
Chapter 4 repair, rehabilitation & retrofiitingChapter 4 repair, rehabilitation & retrofiiting
Chapter 4 repair, rehabilitation & retrofiiting
 
Retaining Walls
Retaining WallsRetaining Walls
Retaining Walls
 
Shear wall
Shear wallShear wall
Shear wall
 
Retaining walls
Retaining wallsRetaining walls
Retaining walls
 
Failures In Masonry Structures Lec 1
Failures In Masonry Structures Lec 1Failures In Masonry Structures Lec 1
Failures In Masonry Structures Lec 1
 
Foundation types
Foundation typesFoundation types
Foundation types
 
Retrofitting of Masonry Buildings
Retrofitting of Masonry BuildingsRetrofitting of Masonry Buildings
Retrofitting of Masonry Buildings
 
Earthquake Resistant Masonry Buildings
Earthquake Resistant Masonry Buildings Earthquake Resistant Masonry Buildings
Earthquake Resistant Masonry Buildings
 
Retaining walls
Retaining walls Retaining walls
Retaining walls
 
footing
footingfooting
footing
 
Prestressed Concrete
Prestressed ConcretePrestressed Concrete
Prestressed Concrete
 
Shear wall ppt
Shear wall ppt Shear wall ppt
Shear wall ppt
 
Chapter 3 caisson
Chapter 3 caissonChapter 3 caisson
Chapter 3 caisson
 

Similar a Masonry structures -_chapter_9_and_10

Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structure
Presentation on earthquake resistance  massonary structurePresentation on earthquake resistance  massonary structure
Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structure
Radhey Verma
 
Review study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear walls
Review study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear wallsReview study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear walls
Review study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear walls
eSAT Publishing House
 
Ann vii -structure repairs bihar
Ann vii -structure repairs biharAnn vii -structure repairs bihar
Ann vii -structure repairs bihar
Vaishnav Mishra
 
repair rehabilitation and Retro fitting.pptx
repair rehabilitation and Retro fitting.pptxrepair rehabilitation and Retro fitting.pptx
repair rehabilitation and Retro fitting.pptx
RaviSartape1
 

Similar a Masonry structures -_chapter_9_and_10 (20)

Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structure
Presentation on earthquake resistance  massonary structurePresentation on earthquake resistance  massonary structure
Presentation on earthquake resistance massonary structure
 
Design of Reinforced Masonry
Design of Reinforced MasonryDesign of Reinforced Masonry
Design of Reinforced Masonry
 
L-3 Shear Wall Part-2.ppt
L-3 Shear Wall Part-2.pptL-3 Shear Wall Part-2.ppt
L-3 Shear Wall Part-2.ppt
 
Shear walls
Shear wallsShear walls
Shear walls
 
Review study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear walls
Review study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear wallsReview study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear walls
Review study on performance of seismically tested repaired shear walls
 
Shear wall and its design guidelines
Shear wall and its design guidelinesShear wall and its design guidelines
Shear wall and its design guidelines
 
Study_of_Cracks_in_Buildings.pdf
Study_of_Cracks_in_Buildings.pdfStudy_of_Cracks_in_Buildings.pdf
Study_of_Cracks_in_Buildings.pdf
 
Wall materials
Wall materialsWall materials
Wall materials
 
Shear Wall
Shear WallShear Wall
Shear Wall
 
Earthquake resistant buildings
Earthquake resistant buildingsEarthquake resistant buildings
Earthquake resistant buildings
 
Cracks in concrete
Cracks in concreteCracks in concrete
Cracks in concrete
 
Cracks in cOncrete
Cracks in cOncreteCracks in cOncrete
Cracks in cOncrete
 
Cracks in concrete
Cracks in concreteCracks in concrete
Cracks in concrete
 
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry wallsKrishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
 
Ann vii -structure repairs bihar
Ann vii -structure repairs biharAnn vii -structure repairs bihar
Ann vii -structure repairs bihar
 
shearwall-160814135725-161228164319.pdf
shearwall-160814135725-161228164319.pdfshearwall-160814135725-161228164319.pdf
shearwall-160814135725-161228164319.pdf
 
Shear Wall PPT
Shear Wall PPTShear Wall PPT
Shear Wall PPT
 
SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF NON-ENGINEERED SCHOOL BUILDING IN STONE MASONRY IN T...
SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF NON-ENGINEERED SCHOOL BUILDING IN STONE MASONRY IN T...SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF NON-ENGINEERED SCHOOL BUILDING IN STONE MASONRY IN T...
SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF NON-ENGINEERED SCHOOL BUILDING IN STONE MASONRY IN T...
 
Earthquick rasistant structure
Earthquick rasistant structureEarthquick rasistant structure
Earthquick rasistant structure
 
repair rehabilitation and Retro fitting.pptx
repair rehabilitation and Retro fitting.pptxrepair rehabilitation and Retro fitting.pptx
repair rehabilitation and Retro fitting.pptx
 

Último

Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Victor Rentea
 

Último (20)

Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering DevelopersWSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
Elevate Developer Efficiency & build GenAI Application with Amazon Q​
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
Biography Of Angeliki Cooney | Senior Vice President Life Sciences | Albany, ...
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital AdaptabilityPlatformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
Platformless Horizons for Digital Adaptability
 
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
FWD Group - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 

Masonry structures -_chapter_9_and_10

  • 1. Chapter-09 Masonry Structures under later loads Siddharth shankar Department of Civil(structure) Engineering Pulchowk Campus
  • 2. Earthquake  Earthquake cause shaking of ground, so a building resting on it will experience motion at its base.  The roof has a tendency to stay in its original position and the roof experiences a force, called inertia force.  Inertia force is the multiplication of the weight and the acceleration, so larger the weight of the building more the earthquake shaking. Engineering representation of earthquake force
  • 3. Masonry Structures Masonry is brittle and tensile and shear strength is very low. Due to Large mass of masonry structures, heavy weight attracts large amounts of seismic forces. Wall to wall connection and roof connection is generally weak. Stress concentration occurs at the corners of windows and doors.
  • 4.  Out of plane failure  In plane failure  Diaphragm failure  Connection Failure  Failure due to opening of wall  Pounding  Non-structural component failure Failure Modes of a Masonry buildings
  • 5. Out of Plane Failure The Earthquake force is perpendicular to the plane. The wall tends to overturn or bend. This causes the partial or full collapse of the wall. This is due to Inadequate anchorage of wall and roof , long and slender wall, etc. Characterized by vertical cracks at corner, cracks at lintel, roof level and gable wall, etc.
  • 6. In Plane Failure The Earthquake force is parallel to the plane The wall is shear off or bend X- cracks occurs Characterized by vertical cracks at wall intersection, separation of corners of two walls, spalling of materials, etc
  • 7. Diaphragm Failure  Lack of anchoring produce a push of diaphragm against the wall.  Absence of good shear transfer between diaphragms and reaction wall accounts for damage at corner of wall  Rare phenomenon in the event of seismic motion  Separation of wall and diaphragm cause collapse of buildings
  • 8. Connection failure  For given direction of earthquake, wall A acts as a shear wall and B acts as flexure wall.  If the walls are not tied together wall B overturn (out of olane) and wall A slides (in plane) and collapse occurs.  Masonry units should tied properly
  • 9. Failure due to opening in walls  Opening will obstruct the flow of forces from one wall to another.  Large opening in shear wall reduces the strength of wall against the inertia forces.  Results diagonal cracks in the areas of masonry between opening and cracks at the level of opening.  Thus, openings should small and away from corners.
  • 10. Pounding  When the roofs of two adjacent buildings are at different levels, during earthquake, two buildings strike against each other is called pounding.  Pounding results into cracking of the wall.
  • 11. Non Structural components failure Falling of plaster from walls and ceiling. Cracking and overturning of parapets, chimneys, etc. Cracking and overturning of partition walls. Cracking of glasses. Falling of loosely placed objects.
  • 12. Ductile behaviour of reinforced & unreinforced masonry  It is the capacity of an element or structure to undergo large deformation without failure.  Masonry is brittle in nature.  Ductility of masonry structure is governed by the ductility of masonry units & properties of mortar.  Unreinforced masonry cannot withstand tension so cracks develops.  In-plane & out-of-plane failure is also due to ductility of masonry.  To improve ductility reinforcing bars are embedded in the masonry, called reinforced masonry which can resist the seismic force more than unreinforced masonry.
  • 13. Brittle and Ductile force-deformation behavior Brittle Ductile Δy Δu Deformation
  • 14. 1. Walls tend to tear apart.
  • 15. 2. Walls tend to shear off diagonally in direction.
  • 16. 3. Failure at corners of walls
  • 17. 4. Walls tend to collapse
  • 18. 5. Failure at corners of openings
  • 19. 6. Hammering/pounding between two adjacent buildings
  • 20.
  • 21. 7. Separation of thick wall into two layers
  • 22. 8.Separation on unconnected wall at junction
  • 23. 9.Seperation of wall from roof
  • 24.  Non-integrity of wall floor and roof.  Configuration – irregularity of building causes torsional effect.  Large opening of the building.  Inappropriate position of opening.  Lack of cross wall in large length of wall.  Lack of reinforcement make the masonry building brittle.  Pounding effect.  Lack of anchoring element between two walls. Major causes of failure of masonry buildings
  • 25. Elements of Lateral Load Resisting Masonry System
  • 26. Horizontal bands for integrity Connecting peripheral walls for structural robustness and integrity  Plinth band  Lintel band  Roof band  Gable band
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30. Roof structure Light and strong roof is desirable. Secure tiles/slates or use GI sheets. Good jointing in trusses Concrete floors in 1:2:4 concrete with reinforcement in both directions and bend up near supports.
  • 31.
  • 32. Overall arrangement of masonry structure
  • 33. Chapter-10 Testing of masonry elements siddharth shankar Pulchowk Campus Department of Civil Engineering
  • 34. Compressive Strength of Bricks and wall
  • 35. Testing of Wall in compression
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40. Normally carried out: 1. Periodically to evaluate the performance of building 2.To gather information on old building in order to ascertain the methods of repair or to demolish 3. To ascertain the strength of concrete if cube tests failed.
  • 41. NON DESTRUCTIVE TEST (NDT)  Elastic wave tomography  Rebound Hammer / Schmidt Hammer  Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity  Impact Echo Test  X-Rays  Flat Jack Test
  • 42. Elastic wave tomography  Technique used for locating shallow delaminations, cracks, and voids.  Elastic wave tomography is based on two basic principles from heat transfer: conduction and radiation. Sound materials with no voids, gaps, or cracks are more thermally conductive than materials that are delaminated or contain moisture.  This allows rapid areal mapping of internal conditions. It should be noted that the IT method is most useful for the detection of shallow defects and flaws.  Tests For: Voids, Cracks, Moisture.
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 46. Rebound Method  Can be used to determine the in-place compressive strength of concrete within a range of 1500 – 8000 psi (10-55MPa)  A quick and simple mean of checking concrete uniformity.  Measure the distance of rebound of a spring-loaded plunger after it struck a smooth concrete surface.  Results of the test can be affected by factors such as smoothness of concrete surface, size, shape, rigidity of specimen, age & moisture condition.  Type of coarse aggregate & the carbonation of the surface.
  • 48. Nondestructive Test Methods  Rebound Hammer Tests  Schmidt Hammer
  • 49.  Rebound Method Using Rebound Hammer
  • 50. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity  It uses measurement of the speed of ultrasonic pulses through the concrete to correlate concrete strength to standard strength.  Allows the determination of compressive concrete strength and location of cracks.  It will identify non homogenous condition in the structure such as honeycomb, voids and cracks.  Size of cracks can also be determined.
  • 52. Flat Jack Test  Flat jack testing is a nondestructive test of evaluating existing masonry structure. It does not require removal of masonry units - only the removal of small portions of mortar is enough. The flat jack test uses small, thin, hydraulic jacks to apply a force to a section of an existing masonry wall, and the method uses measuring devices to determine the resulting displacement of the masonry.
  • 53. Flat jack testing has many useful applications:  It can be used to determine masonry compressive modulus, which is the stress/strain relationship of the masonry, or axial stress by applying axial load and measuring resulting axial deformation.  It can be used to estimate compressive strength and measure the shear strength.  If the destruction of the masonry units is acceptable, it can be used to directly measure the compressive strength by testing the masonry to
  • 56.  Prepare the test location by removing the brick, including the mortar, on one side of the brick to be tested. The head joint on the opposite side of the brick to be tested is also removed. Care must be exercised so that the mortar joint above or below the brick to be tested is not damaged.  The hydraulic ram is inserted in the space where the brick was removed. A steel loading block is placed between the ram and the brick to be tested so that the ram will distribute its load over the end face of the brick. The dial gauge can also be inserted in the space. Push Shear Test
  • 57.  The brick is then loaded with the ram until the first indication of cracking or movement of the brick.  The ram force and associated deflection on the dial gauge are recorded to develop a force-deflection plot on which the first cracking or movement should be indicated. A dial gauge can be used to calculate a rough estimate of shear stiffness Push Shear Test