The document discusses location based services (LBS) and their evolution, taxonomy, uses in business, and potential outcomes. It describes how LBS have developed from using zip codes to current GPS tracking capabilities. LBS can be categorized based on their communication style, information/entertainment functions, and whether they encourage online or offline interactions. Both positive and negative outcomes for users and businesses are possible from the growing use of LBS technologies.
1. Location Based Services #lbs450
Where the offline & online converge
Megan Cramb | Connor Veitch | Ryan Phillips | Jevta Lukic
2. 2
Rated R
FourSquare For Sex
Viewer Discretion Advised
#lbs450
3. 3
What are Location Based
Services?
A location-based service (LBS) is an information or
entertainment service, which is accessible with
mobile devices through the mobile network and
which uses information on the geographical
position of the mobile device.*
*Thanks wikiepdia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Location-based_service
#lbs450
4. 4
Q: What are the uses of Location
Based Services?
#lbs450
5. 5
Three Uses of LBS
Government
Emergency Commercial
and Military
Services Services
Services
• Military • Ambulance • Fleet tracking
operations locations • Mobile
• Air-traffic • Natural applications
control disaster efforts
#lbs450
6. 6
Three Uses of LBS
Government
Emergency Commercial
and Military
Services Services
Services
• Military • Ambulance • Fleet tracking
operations locations • Mobile
• Air-traffic • Natural applications
control disaster efforts
#lbs450
7. 7
Agenda
Evolution of LBS
LBS Taxonomy
LBS & Surveillance
Motivations of use
LBS & Business
Outcomes
#lbs450
12. 12
LBS Taxonomy*
Push Services Pull Services
Communication Ex. You get an Ex. Request from
alert who is near an application
you who is near you.
Information Ex. Get a terror Ex. Look for the
alert for the city nearest cinema.
you‟re in.
Entertainment Ex. Opted to Ex. Try to find
participate in a someone in your
shooting game & area to „shoot‟.
are „being shot.‟
M-Commerce & Ex. Receive a Ex. Look for cool
Advertising voucher from a events in the
restaurant you‟re area you‟re in.
in. Adapted from: Jochen H. Schiller, A. V. (2004). Location-based services-
Morgan Kaufmann series in data management systems. Elsevier. #lbs450
13. 13
Dimension of LBS
Voluntary vs. Automatic Tracking
Degree of Game Mechanics
Offline to Online vs. Online to
Offline
Functional vs. Ego-Driven
#lbs450
14. 14
D1: Voluntary vs. Automatic
Do users input their location (“Check in”) or does
the application automatically update the user
location?
Voluntary Check-In Automatic GPS Tracking
• BuddyWay • BuddyCloud
• CheckPoints • ComeTogethr
• Facebook Places • EagleTweet
• FourSquare • Grindr
• MeetMoi
#lbs450
15. 15
D2: Degree of Game Mechanics
Creates engagement and fun when using
applications
Uses GM Doesn‟t use GM
• Yelp • Facebook
• FourSquare • Block Chalk
• Geocaching • Grindr
• Waze
#lbs450
16. 16
D3: Offline to Online vs. Online to
Offline
Your offline “real world” activities (visits to venues,
events, locations) are transferred to the online
sphere & facilitate online interaction. Vs. Your
online activities (checking in, disclosing location)
facilitate “real world” offline interaction.
Offline to Online Online to Offline
• Facebook Places • Grindr
• LocalMind • Block Chalk
• Love Clean
London
#lbs450
17. 17
D4: Functional vs. Ego-Driven
Do you do it to achieve an operational purpose or
to show-off?
Functional Ego-Driven
• UrbanSpoon • Facebook Places
• Flixster • FourSquare
#lbs450
20. 20
1st Generation Panopticon
• Early 21st century- CCTV in London
• Citizens learn & alter behaviour
“George Orwell would have been
proud and horrified…” (Kietzmann
& Angell).
#lbs450
21. 21
2nd Generation Panopticon
Enables personal information gathering via:
• Data mining & profiling,
• Loyalty cards
• Mobile phones
Problem with cohesion, Panopticon still imperfect
"Behaviour changing intentions hidden
behind...desirable outcomes".
(Kietzmann & Angell)
#lbs450
22. 22
3rd Generation Panopticon
• Outsourcing of policing duties to the general
population.
• Ultimate public panopticon can exist by convincing
population to spy on itself.
• Social media/ Mobile phone combination (GPS,
tamper-proof time stamps, and facial recognition =
public police).
• Cohesion finally realized
#lbs450
23. 23
Nonopticon
• Privacy Infringement = lack of control over ones
reputation in the world
• Four major "Privacy Interfaces"
1. Person-to-peer
2. Person-to-firm
3. Person-to-state
4. Person-to-public
"We are no longer in control of our public
personae...” (Vaidhyanathan, 2008)
#lbs450
24. 24
Nonopticon
• Two arguments against Panopticon theory:
1. Reality TV shows that presence of cameras often
stimulates odd behaviour, rather than curbing it.
2. Opposite of Penopticon in that the public is being
watched without knowing it (or at least the full
extent of it).
“We will be subjects, mere fodder for
our watchers, means instead of
ends.” (Vaidhyanathan, 2008)
#lbs450
27. 27
Motivations
Conscious Networking Communication
levels
• Posting/checking-in creates interaction.
• Friendships.
• Dating sites.
• Satisfaction.
• Feeling of community.
Find people in your area with similar interests at:
#lbs450
28. 28
Motivations
BlockChalk: a new
service built around
the idea of leaving
simple messages
directly tied to a
specific location.
For companies, it is
free word of mouth,
free reviews, and to
some degree, free
advertising.
#lbs450
30. 30
Why do we do it?
Ego-
Subconscious
Functional VS
levels
Driven
#lbs450
31. 31
Why do we do it?
Ego-
Subconscious
Functional VS
levels
Driven
• You know you are being watched (i.e.
you are deliberately checking yourself
into a location).
• How many people check in to a
location?
• In 2010, Foursquare claimed that its
users check in to locations more
than 380 million times.
#lbs450
32. 32
Why do we do it?
Ego-
Subconscious
Functional VS
levels
Driven
Creating a face on the internet.
Popularity.
• When you are reviewing a restaurant,
you are creating functionality for other
users, as well as creating an ego/face
for yourself.
• Reward:
#lbs450
35. 35
Three Uses of LBS in Business
Marketing Research
Operations & Logistics
Advertising
#lbs450
36. 36
Three Uses of LBS in Business
Marketing Research
• Internal Data Mining
• Partnerships
• Sponsorships/Advertising
• Incentives/Rewards
• Understanding competition
• Lead Generation
#lbs450
37. 37
Three Uses of LBS in Business
Operations & Logistics
• Parcel tracking
• Fleet tracking
• Inventory management
• Efficiency improvements
• Carbon emissions reductions
#lbs450
38. 38
Three Uses of LBS in Business
Advertising
• Promotion of brand through check-ins
• Offer coupons/discounts for check-ins (push
or pull)
• Local deals
• Targeted advertising based on location
(LocalResponse)
#lbs450
42. 42
References
Angell, I. & Kietzmann, J.(June, 2010). Communications of the ACM -Vol. 53, No.6. Panopticon
Revisited. doi: 10.1145/1743546.1743582
BenBassat, D. M. (2008, March). Location-Based Services Put Efficiency on the Map. Retrieved February
22, 2012, from Inbound Logistics: http://www.inboundlogistics.com/cms/article/location-based-
services-put-efficiency-on-the-map/
Holden-Bache, A. (2011, January 4). 9 Ways B2B Companies Can Use Location Based Services.
Retrieved February 22, 2012, from Social : http://socialmediab2b.com/2011/01/b2b-location-based-
services/
Jochen H. Schiller, A. V. (2004). Location-based services- Morgan Kaufmann series in data
management systems. Retrieved February 22, 2012
Location Based Service. (n.d.). Retrieved from MobileIn:
http://www.mobilein.com/location_based_services.htm
SalesBlog! (2011). Retrieved February 22, 2012, from Location Based Services Smart for Business:
http://www.lottspace.com/location-based-services-smart-for-business.html
Shontell, A. (2011, October 12). Check-In Based Ad Platform LocalResponse Raises $5 Million From A
Slew Of Investors. Retrieved February 22, 2012, from Business Insider:
http://www.businessinsider.com/localresponse-raises-5-million-2011-10
Schapsis, C. (2010, December). Location Based Social Networks, Location Based
Social apps and games - Links . Retrieved February 15, 2012, from BDNooz - LBS
Strategies: http://bdnooz.com/lbsn-location-based-social-networking-links/
#axzz1mP7XX9FE
#lbs450
43. 43
References
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2008). The Chronicle Review -Vol.54, Iss.23, P.B7. Naked in the 'Nonopticin'.
Retrieved from: http://www.english.illinois.edu/-people-
/faculty/debaron/582/582%20readings/siva%20on%20privacy.pdf
#lbs450
Notas del editor
Jevta-
Three main types of users of LBS today.
Our focus: commercial services.
The first phone with LBS abilities was the PALM VII that came out in 1999. At this point there were apps like yellowpages that would work off of postal code input to search for businesses nearby. In 2001 the first phone with Global Positioning was released in Japan.In 2002 the automatic location identification came out which no longer required user input to use LBS, this brings the technology much closer to that of today.In 2005 the Can Spam Act was enforced in the US which led to users having to opt in to have their location tracked.Present day we have tons of LBS apps from things like foursquare where you can check in to let your friends know where you are to apps like grinder which use location to determine if someone else in your proximity is looking for a “love connection”. The future holds many opportunities for LBS! One bit of news we found that may affect LBS going forward is a major patent held by apple on LBS useage. The article can be found at http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57326207-37/look-out-here-comes-apples-killer-location-services-patent/
We decided to give order to the chaos of the LBS world. Define and classify LBS according to certain dimensions.
Schiller in his book “Location-based-services” discusses four non-device oriented dimensions that are split into push & pull services. Pull services- those in which the user has to send in a call/request to receive data/information/communication/etc. Push services- those that (usually after an initial opt-in) automatically and by themselves send an update. Communication- communication of some relevant data. Information- information is provided to the user. Entertainment- a level of entertainment, fun, game within LBS. M-commerce & advertising- includes mobile purchasing or targeted advertising based on a user’s location.
Four of our own classifications.
FourSquare requires users to “check-in” to locations in order for their locations to be updated and viewed by other users.Grindr is a mobile app for gay men that automatically updates you with the location of other Grindr members in your vicinity, and then allows you to click on user profiles to get more information and send a message (if so desired).
Facebook is a good example of a LBS that doesn’t use game mechanics. You check in to let your friends know where you are so they can either be jealous or comment or even meet up with you. Aside from this there isn’t motivation to post. You don’t get any awards or recognition for checking in a certain number of times. There’s no ranking system in place to encourage more check ins.Geocaching is a great example incorporating game mechanics into LBS. I like this example because it links the online world with real world fun. Geocaching works like a scavenger hunt. The application brings you to the approximate location using LBS and provides clues about where a “cache” is hidden. After some searching you will find the “cache” (hopefully) which can be anything from the size of a film canister to a shoebox. Within it is a log that you can put your username on and there also may be trinkets inside that you can take one of if you like. Generally to take one it is customary to leave something different behind in its place. There are literally millions of these caches world wide and users comment online about how much they enjoyed the view from where the cache was hidden or that it was a tough search. There is a large online community all involved in this, they all see it as a big secret because they don’t want random people to find the caches.
We have two spheres in our lives: the offline world and the online world. Certain applications facilitate offline, real world interaction (such as checking into a physical space) and transfer that real world action into the online sphere and facilitate online discussions lately (ex. FB places takes your physical location and facilitates online interaction around it via status posts and comments); while certain applications take online interaction and using LBS facilitate offline interaction and real-world meet-ups (ex. Grindr moves online interaction to real-world offline meetings). Certain application do both
-Is it driven by achieving some sort of operational/logistics/functional purpose (I receive information about nearest bank machine) or is motivated by deeper psychological/social needs and motivations (such as need for social interaction, showing off, etc.)
Bentham had an idea for social control via an interesting architectural prison design. The concept was a round prison with the cells situated around the outside of a courtyard, facing in. A guard tower would be situated in the dead center of the courtyard so all acts of the prisoners could be monitored and good behavior would be rewarded while poor behavior would be punished. The guard tower would have one way or mirrored glass so the prisoners would be unable to see the guard, and Bentham theorized that the prisoners (unable to see whether or not a guard was present in the tower) would behave because they believed they were being monitored. This concept has been the focus of many scholarly articles concerning social media and the growing concern for privacy.
The focus of the 1st generation Panopticon was punishing of misdeeds (or the threat of doing so).Where it fell short was in its inability to cover all areas and adequately punish those deserving. It was virtually impossible to monitor all cameras at all times, so misdeeds often went unpunished - when punishment did occur it was well after the crime had been committed. The belief that misdeeds would be punished was not imbedded in society, hence the behavior wasn’t curbed. In many cases, criminals simply avoided areas they knew to be monitored.
2nd generation sees technological advances that provide a means for commerce to gather information on consumers. The focus is no longer just on criminal activity but on buyer preferences and personal interests as well.Rather than scaring the public into believing they are being watched, the 2nd generation led the public to believe they were providing info for beneficial personal outcomes, when the true use of that information was likely to be far more invasive.Once again, people start to avoid the intrusive gathering of data by paying in cash and providing fake names and numbers whenever possible.The system is still imperfect as it lacks cohesion…for example, police databases were independent of one another so crucial info was not being shared
Data gathering systems all linked, providing the cohesion that was lacking in the previous generation. Technology now allows for prevention rather than focusing on punishment alone, and the speed at which information now travels can bring about immediate results.Payment for monitoring others, either for financial reward or simply for virtue. “ The rightness of an action depends on the value of its consequences” (Bentham).
Person to peer involves what one allows friends and family to know about themPerson to firm refers to consumer to business information flows (gathering of info for warranties, contests, etc.). Person to state refers to the information one must provide to the government in the course of filing taxes, issuance of drivers licenses, collecting census data, etc.Person to public is the focus of this presentation and is the most complex. It is essentially the way we regulate what everyone else knows or assumes about us. This interface is very misunderstood and in todays world is just an illusion. As noted above, we are no longer in control of our public personae (Vaidhyanathan, 2008)
The idea that believing one is being watch will curb antisocial behavior is certainly not a slam dunk as can be seen by reality television and Youtube.Vaidhyanathan argues that this concept is not one of a modern-day Panopticon at all, because the public does not know the extent to which it is being watched and monitored.Interesting vantage points from both sides as to how location based services and social media technologies are pervading our private spaces. Both Kietzmann and Ingalls and Vaidhyanathan agree that the direction this technology is taking is leading society down a dangerous path and question whether the good will eventually be overrun by the bad.
Networking/communicationWhen people post and people post back, networking occurs between these people.Ask around is a website that allows people to communicate to one another However, with LBS, is this the same? It is easy to post Friendships are madeAka-aki is a social media app that shows people near you with similar interests and friends that you have. It is almost like an offline facebook, where instead of facebook creeping someone, you can creep them in real life.Dating sites also come to mind in terms of meeting new people.
Neighbourhood interactionsAka-aki, block chalk, the list goes on for sites that allow people to communicate about the issues in their communities, or to simply chat with people who live in the neighbourhood in real-time rather than over email.By doing so, people come together so they can, for example, fix an issue that people in the community have a problem with.
Functional vs. ego-drivenYou know you are being watched. You are deliberately checking yourself into a location, reviewing a restaurant.When you are reviewing a restaurant, you are creating functionality for other users, as well as creating an ego for yourself. Creating a face on the internetPopularity Reward (reading source?)How many people check in to a location?In 2010, foursquare claimed that its users check in to locations more than 380 million times.
The uses of LBS in business: marketing research, operations and logistics, advertising.
Marketing research uses:-conduct data mining on an application that uses LBS to figure out the usages and locations of your users. Use the information for relationship building or further promotion. -Know where your target segment is going and use it to establish partnerships with those venues, locations, establishments to further drive customer relationship building. -use the location knowledge of your customer segment to sponsor or advertise in those venues, locations, establishments they are in. -offer incentives or rewards based on their locations-understand the competitors’ customers and how they move about-use it to generate leads by promoting at where your potential customers are
Operations and logistics:-parcel tracking- value added services for both the company (be able to track and ensure delivery of packages) and for the customers (know and anticipate their packages)-fleet tracking: significantly improves efficiency and operations of various company through building of real-time knowledge of the company’s fleet. Allows for specific coordination. -Allows for superior inventory management through the increased knowledge of inventory/fleet whereabouts. -Through more coordinated planning of fleets and routes, companies significantly reduce time and distance travelled. As such, their carbon footprint is also reduced.
-leverage of social recommendations and social shopping of products. Allows business to be associated with friend recommendations and friend endorsements. As a friend checks into a specific location (ex. Restaurant), he or she essentially advertise and personally endorse that location. As such, their friends are more inclined to check out that place or purchase the same product. As such businesses are promotion check-ins through offering coupons/discounts for customers who check-in. -Hyper-targeted advertising based on a user’s location is becoming more common. This hyper-targeted advertising seems to have much higher click-through rates (upwards of 40%).