SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 35
Descargar para leer sin conexión
RATING AGENCIES – Q&A
  The Risk of Over-reliance on Ratings




                Markus Krebsz, MSI
       SII CPD Seminar, London – 2 July 2009
CONTENT

•   Overview
•   Ratings
•   Application
•   Constructive criticism
•   Risks/Mitigants
•   Questions & close



                             2
OVERVIEW
QWIZDOM SURVEY
As part of this interactive workshop session
•   We asked 50 seminar attendees
•   to answer seven topical questions
•   and to submit their answers via each participants’
•   Qwizdom unit

The following pages
• Illustrate for each question
• the audience’s response
• Indicated by the Qwizdom symbol:

                                                         4
QUESTION 1:

Do you use Rating agencies and if so, how?
            (A) I do not use them

(B) Once a day                   (C) Once a week
    or more                          or more              A
                                                         24%
                                           D
                                          44%
                                                          B
                                                         16%
                                                    C
        (D) I do, but only infrequently            16%
                                                               5
QUESTION 2:

How many (Credit) rating agencies exist globally?

              (A) 3 to 5

                                                 A
                                                10%
(B) 6 to 15                (C) 16 to 30                 B
                                                       13%
                                           D
                                          52%
                                                       C
       (D) More than 30                               25%


                                                             6
1) A.M. Best Company, Inc.                                          33) Islamic International Rating Agency, B.S.C. (IIRA)
 2) Agusto & Co. Ltd.                                                34) Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. (JCR)
 3) Ahbor Rating                                                     35) JCR-VIS Credit Rating Co. Ltd.
 4) Apoyo & Asociados Internacionales S.A.C.                         36) Korea Investors Service, Inc. (KIS)
 5) Bank Watch Ratings S.A.                                          37) Korea Ratings Corporation
 6) BRC Investor Services S.A.                                       38) Lanka Rating Agency, Ltd. (LRA)
 7) Calificadora de Riesgo, PCA                                      39) Malaysian Rating Corporation Berhad (MARC)
 8) Capital Intelligence, Ltd.                                       40) Mikuni & Co., Ltd.
 9) Caribbean Information & Credit Rating Services Ltd. (CariCRIS)   41) Moody's Investors Service
10) Central European Rating Agency (CERA)                            42) National Information & Credit Evaluation, Inc. (NICE)
11) Chengxin International Credit Rating Co., Ltd.                   43) ONICRA Credit Rating Agency of India, Ltd.
12) China Lianhe Credit Rating, Co. Ltd.                             44) P.T. Kasnic Credit Rating Indonesia -- Indonesia
13) Clasificadora de Riesgo Humphreys, Ltda.                         45) P.T. PEFINDO Credit Rating Indonesia
14) Class y Asociados S.A. Clasificadora de Riesgo                   46) Pacific Credit Rating (PCR)
15) CMC International, Ltd.                                          47) Pakistan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. (PACRA)
16) Companhia Portuguesa de Rating, SA (CPR)                         48) Philippine Rating Services, Corp. (PhilRatings)
17) Credit Analysis & Research Ltd (CARE)                            49) RAM Rating Services Berhad (RAM)
18) Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh, Ltd. (CRAB)                  50) Rapid Ratings International, Inc.
19) Credit Rating Information and Services, Ltd. (CRISL)             51) Rating and Investment Information, Inc. (R&I)
20) CRISIL, Ltd.                                                     52) Rus Ratings
21) Dagong Global Credit Rating Co., Ltd.                            53) Seoul Credit Rating & Information, Inc.
22) Dominion Bond Rating Service (DBRS)                              54) Shanghai Credit Information Services Co., Ltd.
23) Duff & Phelps de Colombia, S.A., S.C.V                           55) Shanghai Far East Credit Rating Co., Ltd.
24) Ecuability, SA                                                   56) Slovak Rating Agency, a.s. (SRA)
25) Egan-Jones Rating Company                                        57) SME Rating Agency of India Limited (SMERA)
26) Equilibrium Clasificadora de Riesgo                              58) Sociedad Calificadora de Riesgo Centroamericana, S.A. (SCRiesgo)
27) European Rating Agency (ERA)                                     59) Standard and Poors (S&P)
28) Feller Rate Clasificadora de Riesgo                              60) Taiwan Ratings, Corp. (TCR)
29) Fitch Ratings, Ltd.                                              61) Thai Rating and Information Services Co., Ltd. (TRIS)
30) Global Credit Rating Co.                                         62) TheStreet.com Ratings, Inc.
31) Interfax Rating Agency (IRA)                                     63) Türk KrediRating (TCRating)
32) Investment Information and Credit Rating Agency (ICRA)           64) Veribanc, Inc.


 Source: www.defaultrisk.com                                                                                                                7
QUESTION 3:

AAA (Fitch) = AAA (S&P) = Aaa (Moody’s)?




    YES                          NO
    32%                          68%



                                           8
RATING PRINCIPLES

Fitch Ratings, Standard & Poor’s:
Probability of default (PD) = First dollar of loss
    What is the ultimate default risk?

Moody’s:
Expected loss (EL) = [(PD) X (LGD)]
   What is the amount of net loss suffered?

                                                     9
Y
QUESTION 4:

D (Fitch) = D (S&P) = D (Moody’s)?




   YES                      NO
   47%                      53%



                                     10
RATINGS MAPPING TABLE
                         Fitch Ratings                                  Moody’s                    Standard & Poors                       Mapped
                     Long-term rating   Short-term rating   Long-term rating   Short-term rating   Long-term rating   Short-term rating   internal
                                                                                                                                          r a t i n g
 Investment Grade




                          AAA                                     Aaa                                   AAA                                   iAAA

                          AA+                 F1+                 Aa1                                   AA+                                   iAA+
                                                                                                                            A-1+
                           AA                                     Aa2                 P1                 AA                                   iAA

                           AA-                                    Aa3                                    AA-                                  iAA-
                                           F1+ or F1
                           A+                                     A1                                     A+                 A-1               iA+

                            A                  F1                 A2              P-1 or P-2              A              A-1 or A-2            iA

                           A-               F1 or F2              A3                                     A-                                   iA-
                                                                                     P-2                                    A-2
                          BBB+                 F2                Baa1                                   BBB+                                 iBBB+

                          BBB               F2 or F3             Baa2             P-2 or P-3            BBB              A-2 or A-3           iBBB

                          BBB-                 F3                Baa3                P-3                BBB-                A-3              iBBB-


                          BB+                                     Ba1                                   BB+                                   iBB+

                           BB                  B                  Ba2                                    BB                                   iBB
 Speculative Grade




                                                                                                                             B
                           BB-                                    Ba3                                    BB-                                  iBB-
                                                                                                                       Ranges within
                           B+                                     B1                                     B+                                   iB+
                                                                                                                      B-1, B-2 and B-3

                            B                                     B2                                      B                                    iB

                           B-                                     B3              Not Prime              B-                                   iB-

                          CCC+                                   Caa1                                   CCC+                                 iCCC+
                                               C
                          CCC                                    Caa2                                   CCC                                   iCCC

                          CCC-                                   Caa3                                   CCC-                 C               iCCC-

                           CC                                     Ca                                     CC                                   iCC

                            C                                      C                                      C                                    iC

                       DDD, DD, D              D
                                                                 Moody’s: D                               D                  D                 iD




Source: Bloomberg, Fitch, Moody’s and S&P                                                                                                               11
QUESTION 5:
  SF Bond 1 rated AAA (Fitch/ S&P/ Moody’s)
= SF Bond 2 rated AAA (Fitch/ S&P/ Moody’s)?




     YES                            NO
     13%                            87%




                                               12
SUPER-SENIOR RATINGS
Structure 1                Structure 2
Tranche 1:          AAA    Tranche 1:          AAA AA
Tranche 2:          AA+    Tranche 2:          AAA A
Tranche 3:          A      Tranche 3:          AAA
Tranche 4:          BBB-   Tranche 4:          AA+
Tranche 5:          BB     Tranche 5:          A
Tranche 6:          B+     Tranche 6:          BBB-
First Loss piece:   NR     Tranche 7:          BB
                           Tranche 8           B+
                           First Loss piece:   NR
                                                    13
RATINGS
QUESTION 6:
   How would you define ‘rating’?

                (A) Opinion
(B) Benchmark                 (C) Benchmark
    measure                       measure               A
    for PD           AAA          for LGD D            25%
                                         41%

                                                     B
                                                C   31%
                                               3%

(D) View not necessarily based on facts or knowledge
                                                             15
RATING DEFINITION

• An opinion… *            [Financial journalists]
• …on the relative ability…
• …of an entity to meet financial commitments.
*

       ‹ä|xã ÇÉà ÇxvxáátÜ|Äç utáxw ÉÇ ytvà ÉÜ ~ÇÉãÄxwzx

Ratings are benchmark measures of…
• Probability of default (PD)
• Expectations of Loss given default (LGD)
                                                          16
RATINGS…
…can capture:                 …do NOT capture:

• Credit risk                   Market risk
                                Liquidity risk
                                Operational risk
                                Basis risk (IR risk)

 …and are “hard-wired”…
• by Basel II
• into banks’ credit rating models
• Investment guidelines and Asset management mandates   17
STATISTICAL: Probability of Default
30%
                                                          1-year PD
25%

20%

15%                                                                                                            Moodys
                                                                                                               S&P
10%
                                                                                                               Fitch
5%

0%
                  AA+




                               AA-


                                     A+




                                              A-




                                                                        BB+




                                                                                   BB-
                                                           BBB




                                                                                              B
                                          A




                                                   BBB+




                                                                 BBB-




                                                                                         B+




                                                                                                  B-
           AAA




                          AA




                                                                              BB




                                                                                                       CCC/C
                               AA




                                                                                   BB
                                                                 BBB
80%
                                                          10-year PD
70%

60%
50%

40%                                                                                                            Moodys

30%                                                                                                            S&P

20%                                                                                                            Fitch

10%

0%
                  AA+




                               AA-


                                     A+




                                              A-




                                                                        BB+




                                                                                   BB-
                                                           BBB




                                                                                              B
                                          A




                                                   BBB+




                                                                 BBB-




                                                                                         B+




                                                                                                  B-
           AAA




                          AA




                                                                              BB




                                                                                                       CCC/C
      Source: Fitch Ratings                                                                                             18
RATINGS SCOPE
• Public

• Private

• Credit assessment

• Market-Implied ratings

           (CDS, Equity, Spread, Price etc.)
                                               19
RATING ACTIONS
Rating                         Suffix
DEAL STAGE                     RATING WATCH
• Preliminary                  • Positive
• Final                        • Negative
• Paid in Full (PIF) /         • Evolving / Uncertain
  Redemption
                               OUTLOOK
INDICATORS                     • Positive
• Upgrade, Downgrade           • Negative
• Affirmation / Confirmation   • Stable
• Withdrawn
                                                        20
APPLICATION
RATINGS are used by …
Banks, Other Financial Institutions, Originators & Issuers,
Investors, Financial Regulators, Other Rating agencies, etc. …

in order to …
•   Outsource analysis
•   Determine required economic and regulatory capital charges
•   Manage individual credit & portfolio risks
•   Feature as input into Structured Finance models (CDO2 etc.)




                                                                  22
CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
FAILURES
AIG, Bear Stearns, Bradford & Bingley, Enron, Icelandic banks,
Lehman Bros., Monolines, Northern Rock, Parmalat, etc.

In their own words...
Fitch: “… did not foresee the magnitude of the decline…or the
    dramatic shift in borrower behavior…”
Moody’s: “We did not . . . anticipate the magnitude and speed
    of the deterioration in mortgage quality or the suddenness of
    the transition to restrictive lending.”
S&P: “it is now clear that a number of assumptions used in
    preparing ratings on mortgage-backed securities issued
    between 2005 and mid-2007 did not work.”
Source: US Government Oversight and Reform Committee, Oct 2008
                                                                    24
CRITICISM

•   Business model: Too slow to react
•   Assumptions, methodologies & models
•   Conflict of interest (“issuer-pays” model)
•   Limited capture
•   Split ratings
•   Notching
•   Implied ratings & internal competition
•   etc.
                                                 25
THE RISKS OF OVER-RELIANCE
- AND SUITABLE MITIGANTS
TIMELY ACTIONS and DEFERRAL
Rating process:                Rating scope vs. time:
Timeliness of Rating changes   Bond maturity profile
• Process stages to reach      • Legal final vs. expected final
  rating decisions               maturity
• Detection of bond- vs.       • Life-time ratings (40+ years)
  asset class-specific         • Timely payment of interest
  and/or systemic issues         & ultimate payment of
                                 principal




                                                           27
TIMELAG of RATING ACTIONS
Number of Global SF Bond Downgrades
          by CRA
190,000
180,000
170,000                                                                                                        176,046
160,000
150,000
                              TOTAL                     S&P             Moody's              Fitch
140,000
130,000
120,000
110,000
                                                                                                     111,605
100,000
 90,000
 80,000
 70,000
 60,000                                                                                    68,372
 50,000
                                                               49,594   50,968
 40,000                                                                           47,510
 30,000
 20,000
                                                      30,749
                                             7,992
 10,000                    2,042
           1,166
     0
           1Q07             2Q07             3Q07      4Q07     1Q08     2Q08      3Q08     4Q08      1Q09      2Q09
           (Since January 2007 - Source: Bloomberg)
                                                                                                                         28
Regional problem                                                             GLOBAL IMPACT
Number of Global SF Bond Downgrades
          by Region
190,000
180,000
170,000                                                                                                              175,208
160,000
150,000
                                         TOTAL                    Europe                     US
140,000
130,000
120,000
110,000
                                                                                                           111,239
100,000
 90,000
 80,000
 70,000
 60,000                                                                                           68,073
 50,000
 40,000                                                          49,160    50,676   47,284
 30,000
 20,000
                                                        30,597
                                                7,981
 10,000                      2,035
            1,161
     0
            1Q07              2Q07              3Q07     4Q07     1Q08      2Q08     3Q08          4Q08     1Q09      2Q09
          (Since January 2007 - Source: Bloomberg)

                                                                                                                               29
OPERATIONAL RISKS

• Changing methodologies and assumptions

• Timeliness of rating decisions

• Model risks

• Striking the right balance between non- and
  over-regulation
                                                30
RISK MITIGANTS

• Understanding the meaning of ratings
• Understanding instruments’ risks
• Independent analysis
• Internal ratings
• Disputing rating decisions and methodologies
  with the agencies – is it really worth it?
• Operational risk scenario: Awareness that
  agencies CAN and DO get their ratings wrong
                                                 31
QUESTIONS & CLOSE


                    32
QUESTION 7:
Would you now give CRAs more or less credit ?



                          More
                Less



     Less                           More
     70%                            30%



                                                33
CONTACT
Markus Krebsz
     +44 (0) 79 85 065 045
     krebsz@web.de
     markus.krebsz@4-most.co.uk




4most
     Linen Hall
     162-168 Regents Street
     London, W1B 5TE
     Tel. +44 (0) 207 038 3690
     www.4-most.co.uk
ANNEX: Ratings & Probability of Default (PD)
                1 year                                   5 year                                   10 year
       Moodys             S&P    Fitch          Moodys             S&P    Fitch          Moodys             S&P    Fitch
Aaa    0.00%      AAA    0.00%   0.00%   Aaa    0.18%      AAA    0.10%   0.11%   Aaa    0.40%       AAA   0.45%   0.37%

Aa1    0.00%      AA+    0.00%   0.00%   Aa1    0.15%      AA+    0.16%   0.11%   Aa1    0.25%       AA+   0.34%   0.47%

Aa2    0.00%       AA    0.00%   0.00%   Aa2    0.28%       AA    0.15%   0.14%   Aa2    0.67%       AA    0.77%   0.68%

Aa3    0.00%       AA-   0.02%   0.01%   Aa3    0.18%       AA-   0.52%   0.25%   Aa3    0.33%       AA-   1.11%   0.91%

 A1    0.00%       A+    0.05%   0.02%    A1    0.38%       A+    0.64%   0.41%    A1    0.84%       A+    1.68%   1.30%

 A2    0.03%       A     0.04%   0.04%    A2    0.68%       A     0.42%   0.57%    A2    1.69%       A     1.80%   1.78%

 A3    0.03%       A-    0.04%   0.04%    A3    0.65%       A-    0.86%   0.75%    A3    1.69%       A-    2.44%   1.91%

Baa1   0.17%      BBB+   0.22%   0.22%   Baa1   1.46%      BBB+   2.30%   1.82%   Baa1   2.31%      BBB+   4.65%   3.82%

Baa2   0.12%      BBB    0.28%   0.21%   Baa2   2.11%      BBB    2.17%   2.14%   Baa2   5.49%       BBB   5.27%   5.61%

Baa3   0.41%      BBB-   0.39%   0.42%   Baa3   3.60%      BBB-   4.94%   4.03%   Baa3   7.20%      BBB-   8.97%   8.23%

Ba1    0.66%      BB+    0.56%   0.63%   Ba1    6.76%      BB+    6.47%   6.19%   Ba1    12.38%      BB+   11.74% 12.25%

Ba2    0.62%       BB    0.95%   0.90%   Ba2    8.82%       BB    9.98%   8.37%   Ba2    14.66%      BB    17.34% 17.08%

Ba3    2.23%       BB-   1.76%   2.05%   Ba3    19.14%      BB-   15.03% 15.92%   Ba3    36.24%      BB-   24.97% 30.27%

 B1    3.03%       B+    3.01%   3.10%    B1    25.27%      B+    20.86% 21.53%    B1    47.43%      B+    30.15% 38.18%

 B2    5.93%       B     8.34%   7.24%    B2    31.24%      B     29.44% 27.84%    B2    44.48%      B     36.29% 41.06%

 B3    10.77%      B-    12.15% 11.71%    B3    43.55%      B-    37.71% 39.23%    B3    62.32%      B-    45.05% 53.69%

Caa-C 22.24%      CCC/C 28.83% 25.54%    Caa-C 60.40%      CCC/C 50.85% 53.55%    Caa-C 78.81%      CCC/C 56.45% 65.07%




                                                                                                                           35

Más contenido relacionado

Destacado (9)

Credit rating agencies
Credit rating agenciesCredit rating agencies
Credit rating agencies
 
Sound Credit Risk Experience Sharing Vietnam Fsa And Bank
Sound Credit Risk Experience Sharing   Vietnam Fsa And BankSound Credit Risk Experience Sharing   Vietnam Fsa And Bank
Sound Credit Risk Experience Sharing Vietnam Fsa And Bank
 
Understanding XBRL
Understanding XBRLUnderstanding XBRL
Understanding XBRL
 
XBRL Presentation
XBRL PresentationXBRL Presentation
XBRL Presentation
 
Credit rating
Credit ratingCredit rating
Credit rating
 
XBRL The Future Of Financial Reporting
XBRL The Future Of Financial ReportingXBRL The Future Of Financial Reporting
XBRL The Future Of Financial Reporting
 
Credit rating ppt
Credit rating pptCredit rating ppt
Credit rating ppt
 
Intro to Credit Rating Agencies
Intro to Credit Rating AgenciesIntro to Credit Rating Agencies
Intro to Credit Rating Agencies
 
XBRL
XBRLXBRL
XBRL
 

Similar a Rating Agencies - Q&A (9)

RISKY RATINGS: The Risk of Over-reliance on Credit ratings and how to use CRA...
RISKY RATINGS: The Risk of Over-reliance on Credit ratings and how to use CRA...RISKY RATINGS: The Risk of Over-reliance on Credit ratings and how to use CRA...
RISKY RATINGS: The Risk of Over-reliance on Credit ratings and how to use CRA...
 
Rating Agencies: The Risk Of Over-reliance On Ratings
Rating Agencies: The Risk Of Over-reliance On RatingsRating Agencies: The Risk Of Over-reliance On Ratings
Rating Agencies: The Risk Of Over-reliance On Ratings
 
credit raing seminar
credit raing seminarcredit raing seminar
credit raing seminar
 
Bajaj
BajajBajaj
Bajaj
 
Credit Rating
Credit RatingCredit Rating
Credit Rating
 
Seed study presentation London NESTA
Seed study presentation London NESTASeed study presentation London NESTA
Seed study presentation London NESTA
 
Seed study presentation London NESTA
Seed study presentation London NESTASeed study presentation London NESTA
Seed study presentation London NESTA
 
Tracxn - Monthly Unicorn Report - Nov 2020
Tracxn - Monthly Unicorn Report - Nov 2020Tracxn - Monthly Unicorn Report - Nov 2020
Tracxn - Monthly Unicorn Report - Nov 2020
 
Claude Resources Inc. 2012 Annual General Meeting Presentation
Claude Resources Inc. 2012 Annual General Meeting PresentationClaude Resources Inc. 2012 Annual General Meeting Presentation
Claude Resources Inc. 2012 Annual General Meeting Presentation
 

Más de Markus Krebsz

20161215 A New Dawn for Municipal Financing Instruments (long) - Lexology
20161215 A New Dawn for Municipal Financing Instruments (long) - Lexology20161215 A New Dawn for Municipal Financing Instruments (long) - Lexology
20161215 A New Dawn for Municipal Financing Instruments (long) - Lexology
Markus Krebsz
 
ECE_CTCS_WP.6_2016_4E_GRM
ECE_CTCS_WP.6_2016_4E_GRMECE_CTCS_WP.6_2016_4E_GRM
ECE_CTCS_WP.6_2016_4E_GRM
Markus Krebsz
 
20161110 FT - UK councils set for launch of munibonds after cuts
20161110 FT - UK councils set for launch of munibonds after cuts20161110 FT - UK councils set for launch of munibonds after cuts
20161110 FT - UK councils set for launch of munibonds after cuts
Markus Krebsz
 
Bond agency happy with ratings _ Room 151
Bond agency happy with ratings _ Room 151Bond agency happy with ratings _ Room 151
Bond agency happy with ratings _ Room 151
Markus Krebsz
 
Imperial College 2016 Brochure Finance-Short-Programmes
Imperial College 2016 Brochure Finance-Short-ProgrammesImperial College 2016 Brochure Finance-Short-Programmes
Imperial College 2016 Brochure Finance-Short-Programmes
Markus Krebsz
 
GlobalCrisisBibliographyWebed
GlobalCrisisBibliographyWebedGlobalCrisisBibliographyWebed
GlobalCrisisBibliographyWebed
Markus Krebsz
 
MUNICIPAL-BONDS_Dialogue-Series
MUNICIPAL-BONDS_Dialogue-SeriesMUNICIPAL-BONDS_Dialogue-Series
MUNICIPAL-BONDS_Dialogue-Series
Markus Krebsz
 
PRM_Handbook_Introduction_and_Contents_2015edition
PRM_Handbook_Introduction_and_Contents_2015editionPRM_Handbook_Introduction_and_Contents_2015edition
PRM_Handbook_Introduction_and_Contents_2015edition
Markus Krebsz
 
PRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
PRMIA_CCRM_IntroductionPRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
PRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
Markus Krebsz
 
20150203 Rating vital to new UK issuer s price hopes - GlobalCapital
20150203 Rating vital to new UK issuer s price hopes - GlobalCapital20150203 Rating vital to new UK issuer s price hopes - GlobalCapital
20150203 Rating vital to new UK issuer s price hopes - GlobalCapital
Markus Krebsz
 
20150122 LGA Press Release Municipal bonds agency makes key appointments
20150122 LGA Press Release Municipal bonds agency makes key appointments20150122 LGA Press Release Municipal bonds agency makes key appointments
20150122 LGA Press Release Municipal bonds agency makes key appointments
Markus Krebsz
 
unleashing-municipal-enterprise
unleashing-municipal-enterpriseunleashing-municipal-enterprise
unleashing-municipal-enterprise
Markus Krebsz
 
20141215 Councils pool resources to make borrowing cheaper for one another - ...
20141215 Councils pool resources to make borrowing cheaper for one another - ...20141215 Councils pool resources to make borrowing cheaper for one another - ...
20141215 Councils pool resources to make borrowing cheaper for one another - ...
Markus Krebsz
 
20141215 Council bond agency green lit to launch - LocalGov
20141215 Council bond agency green lit to launch - LocalGov20141215 Council bond agency green lit to launch - LocalGov
20141215 Council bond agency green lit to launch - LocalGov
Markus Krebsz
 

Más de Markus Krebsz (20)

20161215 A New Dawn for Municipal Financing Instruments (long) - Lexology
20161215 A New Dawn for Municipal Financing Instruments (long) - Lexology20161215 A New Dawn for Municipal Financing Instruments (long) - Lexology
20161215 A New Dawn for Municipal Financing Instruments (long) - Lexology
 
ECE_CTCS_WP.6_2016_4E_GRM
ECE_CTCS_WP.6_2016_4E_GRMECE_CTCS_WP.6_2016_4E_GRM
ECE_CTCS_WP.6_2016_4E_GRM
 
20161110 FT - UK councils set for launch of munibonds after cuts
20161110 FT - UK councils set for launch of munibonds after cuts20161110 FT - UK councils set for launch of munibonds after cuts
20161110 FT - UK councils set for launch of munibonds after cuts
 
Bond agency happy with ratings _ Room 151
Bond agency happy with ratings _ Room 151Bond agency happy with ratings _ Room 151
Bond agency happy with ratings _ Room 151
 
Imperial College 2016 Brochure Finance-Short-Programmes
Imperial College 2016 Brochure Finance-Short-ProgrammesImperial College 2016 Brochure Finance-Short-Programmes
Imperial College 2016 Brochure Finance-Short-Programmes
 
GlobalCrisisBibliographyWebed
GlobalCrisisBibliographyWebedGlobalCrisisBibliographyWebed
GlobalCrisisBibliographyWebed
 
UKMBA_QAs
UKMBA_QAsUKMBA_QAs
UKMBA_QAs
 
MUNICIPAL-BONDS_Dialogue-Series
MUNICIPAL-BONDS_Dialogue-SeriesMUNICIPAL-BONDS_Dialogue-Series
MUNICIPAL-BONDS_Dialogue-Series
 
PRM_Handbook_Introduction_and_Contents_2015edition
PRM_Handbook_Introduction_and_Contents_2015editionPRM_Handbook_Introduction_and_Contents_2015edition
PRM_Handbook_Introduction_and_Contents_2015edition
 
Brochure_FINAL_WEB
Brochure_FINAL_WEBBrochure_FINAL_WEB
Brochure_FINAL_WEB
 
WP6_2015_05E
WP6_2015_05EWP6_2015_05E
WP6_2015_05E
 
PRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
PRMIA_CCRM_IntroductionPRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
PRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
 
20150203 Rating vital to new UK issuer s price hopes - GlobalCapital
20150203 Rating vital to new UK issuer s price hopes - GlobalCapital20150203 Rating vital to new UK issuer s price hopes - GlobalCapital
20150203 Rating vital to new UK issuer s price hopes - GlobalCapital
 
20150122 LGA Press Release Municipal bonds agency makes key appointments
20150122 LGA Press Release Municipal bonds agency makes key appointments20150122 LGA Press Release Municipal bonds agency makes key appointments
20150122 LGA Press Release Municipal bonds agency makes key appointments
 
unleashing-municipal-enterprise
unleashing-municipal-enterpriseunleashing-municipal-enterprise
unleashing-municipal-enterprise
 
20141215 Councils pool resources to make borrowing cheaper for one another - ...
20141215 Councils pool resources to make borrowing cheaper for one another - ...20141215 Councils pool resources to make borrowing cheaper for one another - ...
20141215 Councils pool resources to make borrowing cheaper for one another - ...
 
20141215 Council bond agency green lit to launch - LocalGov
20141215 Council bond agency green lit to launch - LocalGov20141215 Council bond agency green lit to launch - LocalGov
20141215 Council bond agency green lit to launch - LocalGov
 
ROGUE TRADING: A People Risk Analysis
ROGUE TRADING: A People Risk AnalysisROGUE TRADING: A People Risk Analysis
ROGUE TRADING: A People Risk Analysis
 
Basel III Clinic
Basel III ClinicBasel III Clinic
Basel III Clinic
 
Global Financial Markets & The Recent Credit Crisis: Impressions from a Perso...
Global Financial Markets & The Recent Credit Crisis: Impressions from a Perso...Global Financial Markets & The Recent Credit Crisis: Impressions from a Perso...
Global Financial Markets & The Recent Credit Crisis: Impressions from a Perso...
 

Rating Agencies - Q&A

  • 1. RATING AGENCIES – Q&A The Risk of Over-reliance on Ratings Markus Krebsz, MSI SII CPD Seminar, London – 2 July 2009
  • 2. CONTENT • Overview • Ratings • Application • Constructive criticism • Risks/Mitigants • Questions & close 2
  • 4. QWIZDOM SURVEY As part of this interactive workshop session • We asked 50 seminar attendees • to answer seven topical questions • and to submit their answers via each participants’ • Qwizdom unit The following pages • Illustrate for each question • the audience’s response • Indicated by the Qwizdom symbol: 4
  • 5. QUESTION 1: Do you use Rating agencies and if so, how? (A) I do not use them (B) Once a day (C) Once a week or more or more A 24% D 44% B 16% C (D) I do, but only infrequently 16% 5
  • 6. QUESTION 2: How many (Credit) rating agencies exist globally? (A) 3 to 5 A 10% (B) 6 to 15 (C) 16 to 30 B 13% D 52% C (D) More than 30 25% 6
  • 7. 1) A.M. Best Company, Inc. 33) Islamic International Rating Agency, B.S.C. (IIRA) 2) Agusto & Co. Ltd. 34) Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. (JCR) 3) Ahbor Rating 35) JCR-VIS Credit Rating Co. Ltd. 4) Apoyo & Asociados Internacionales S.A.C. 36) Korea Investors Service, Inc. (KIS) 5) Bank Watch Ratings S.A. 37) Korea Ratings Corporation 6) BRC Investor Services S.A. 38) Lanka Rating Agency, Ltd. (LRA) 7) Calificadora de Riesgo, PCA 39) Malaysian Rating Corporation Berhad (MARC) 8) Capital Intelligence, Ltd. 40) Mikuni & Co., Ltd. 9) Caribbean Information & Credit Rating Services Ltd. (CariCRIS) 41) Moody's Investors Service 10) Central European Rating Agency (CERA) 42) National Information & Credit Evaluation, Inc. (NICE) 11) Chengxin International Credit Rating Co., Ltd. 43) ONICRA Credit Rating Agency of India, Ltd. 12) China Lianhe Credit Rating, Co. Ltd. 44) P.T. Kasnic Credit Rating Indonesia -- Indonesia 13) Clasificadora de Riesgo Humphreys, Ltda. 45) P.T. PEFINDO Credit Rating Indonesia 14) Class y Asociados S.A. Clasificadora de Riesgo 46) Pacific Credit Rating (PCR) 15) CMC International, Ltd. 47) Pakistan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. (PACRA) 16) Companhia Portuguesa de Rating, SA (CPR) 48) Philippine Rating Services, Corp. (PhilRatings) 17) Credit Analysis & Research Ltd (CARE) 49) RAM Rating Services Berhad (RAM) 18) Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh, Ltd. (CRAB) 50) Rapid Ratings International, Inc. 19) Credit Rating Information and Services, Ltd. (CRISL) 51) Rating and Investment Information, Inc. (R&I) 20) CRISIL, Ltd. 52) Rus Ratings 21) Dagong Global Credit Rating Co., Ltd. 53) Seoul Credit Rating & Information, Inc. 22) Dominion Bond Rating Service (DBRS) 54) Shanghai Credit Information Services Co., Ltd. 23) Duff & Phelps de Colombia, S.A., S.C.V 55) Shanghai Far East Credit Rating Co., Ltd. 24) Ecuability, SA 56) Slovak Rating Agency, a.s. (SRA) 25) Egan-Jones Rating Company 57) SME Rating Agency of India Limited (SMERA) 26) Equilibrium Clasificadora de Riesgo 58) Sociedad Calificadora de Riesgo Centroamericana, S.A. (SCRiesgo) 27) European Rating Agency (ERA) 59) Standard and Poors (S&P) 28) Feller Rate Clasificadora de Riesgo 60) Taiwan Ratings, Corp. (TCR) 29) Fitch Ratings, Ltd. 61) Thai Rating and Information Services Co., Ltd. (TRIS) 30) Global Credit Rating Co. 62) TheStreet.com Ratings, Inc. 31) Interfax Rating Agency (IRA) 63) Türk KrediRating (TCRating) 32) Investment Information and Credit Rating Agency (ICRA) 64) Veribanc, Inc. Source: www.defaultrisk.com 7
  • 8. QUESTION 3: AAA (Fitch) = AAA (S&P) = Aaa (Moody’s)? YES NO 32% 68% 8
  • 9. RATING PRINCIPLES Fitch Ratings, Standard & Poor’s: Probability of default (PD) = First dollar of loss What is the ultimate default risk? Moody’s: Expected loss (EL) = [(PD) X (LGD)] What is the amount of net loss suffered? 9
  • 10. Y QUESTION 4: D (Fitch) = D (S&P) = D (Moody’s)? YES NO 47% 53% 10
  • 11. RATINGS MAPPING TABLE Fitch Ratings Moody’s Standard & Poors Mapped Long-term rating Short-term rating Long-term rating Short-term rating Long-term rating Short-term rating internal r a t i n g Investment Grade AAA Aaa AAA iAAA AA+ F1+ Aa1 AA+ iAA+ A-1+ AA Aa2 P1 AA iAA AA- Aa3 AA- iAA- F1+ or F1 A+ A1 A+ A-1 iA+ A F1 A2 P-1 or P-2 A A-1 or A-2 iA A- F1 or F2 A3 A- iA- P-2 A-2 BBB+ F2 Baa1 BBB+ iBBB+ BBB F2 or F3 Baa2 P-2 or P-3 BBB A-2 or A-3 iBBB BBB- F3 Baa3 P-3 BBB- A-3 iBBB- BB+ Ba1 BB+ iBB+ BB B Ba2 BB iBB Speculative Grade B BB- Ba3 BB- iBB- Ranges within B+ B1 B+ iB+ B-1, B-2 and B-3 B B2 B iB B- B3 Not Prime B- iB- CCC+ Caa1 CCC+ iCCC+ C CCC Caa2 CCC iCCC CCC- Caa3 CCC- C iCCC- CC Ca CC iCC C C C iC DDD, DD, D D Moody’s: D D D iD Source: Bloomberg, Fitch, Moody’s and S&P 11
  • 12. QUESTION 5: SF Bond 1 rated AAA (Fitch/ S&P/ Moody’s) = SF Bond 2 rated AAA (Fitch/ S&P/ Moody’s)? YES NO 13% 87% 12
  • 13. SUPER-SENIOR RATINGS Structure 1 Structure 2 Tranche 1: AAA Tranche 1: AAA AA Tranche 2: AA+ Tranche 2: AAA A Tranche 3: A Tranche 3: AAA Tranche 4: BBB- Tranche 4: AA+ Tranche 5: BB Tranche 5: A Tranche 6: B+ Tranche 6: BBB- First Loss piece: NR Tranche 7: BB Tranche 8 B+ First Loss piece: NR 13
  • 15. QUESTION 6: How would you define ‘rating’? (A) Opinion (B) Benchmark (C) Benchmark measure measure A for PD AAA for LGD D 25% 41% B C 31% 3% (D) View not necessarily based on facts or knowledge 15
  • 16. RATING DEFINITION • An opinion… * [Financial journalists] • …on the relative ability… • …of an entity to meet financial commitments. * ‹ä|xã ÇÉà ÇxvxáátÜ|Äç utáxw ÉÇ ytvà ÉÜ ~ÇÉãÄxwzx Ratings are benchmark measures of… • Probability of default (PD) • Expectations of Loss given default (LGD) 16
  • 17. RATINGS… …can capture: …do NOT capture: • Credit risk Market risk Liquidity risk Operational risk Basis risk (IR risk) …and are “hard-wired”… • by Basel II • into banks’ credit rating models • Investment guidelines and Asset management mandates 17
  • 18. STATISTICAL: Probability of Default 30% 1-year PD 25% 20% 15% Moodys S&P 10% Fitch 5% 0% AA+ AA- A+ A- BB+ BB- BBB B A BBB+ BBB- B+ B- AAA AA BB CCC/C AA BB BBB 80% 10-year PD 70% 60% 50% 40% Moodys 30% S&P 20% Fitch 10% 0% AA+ AA- A+ A- BB+ BB- BBB B A BBB+ BBB- B+ B- AAA AA BB CCC/C Source: Fitch Ratings 18
  • 19. RATINGS SCOPE • Public • Private • Credit assessment • Market-Implied ratings (CDS, Equity, Spread, Price etc.) 19
  • 20. RATING ACTIONS Rating Suffix DEAL STAGE RATING WATCH • Preliminary • Positive • Final • Negative • Paid in Full (PIF) / • Evolving / Uncertain Redemption OUTLOOK INDICATORS • Positive • Upgrade, Downgrade • Negative • Affirmation / Confirmation • Stable • Withdrawn 20
  • 22. RATINGS are used by … Banks, Other Financial Institutions, Originators & Issuers, Investors, Financial Regulators, Other Rating agencies, etc. … in order to … • Outsource analysis • Determine required economic and regulatory capital charges • Manage individual credit & portfolio risks • Feature as input into Structured Finance models (CDO2 etc.) 22
  • 24. FAILURES AIG, Bear Stearns, Bradford & Bingley, Enron, Icelandic banks, Lehman Bros., Monolines, Northern Rock, Parmalat, etc. In their own words... Fitch: “… did not foresee the magnitude of the decline…or the dramatic shift in borrower behavior…” Moody’s: “We did not . . . anticipate the magnitude and speed of the deterioration in mortgage quality or the suddenness of the transition to restrictive lending.” S&P: “it is now clear that a number of assumptions used in preparing ratings on mortgage-backed securities issued between 2005 and mid-2007 did not work.” Source: US Government Oversight and Reform Committee, Oct 2008 24
  • 25. CRITICISM • Business model: Too slow to react • Assumptions, methodologies & models • Conflict of interest (“issuer-pays” model) • Limited capture • Split ratings • Notching • Implied ratings & internal competition • etc. 25
  • 26. THE RISKS OF OVER-RELIANCE - AND SUITABLE MITIGANTS
  • 27. TIMELY ACTIONS and DEFERRAL Rating process: Rating scope vs. time: Timeliness of Rating changes Bond maturity profile • Process stages to reach • Legal final vs. expected final rating decisions maturity • Detection of bond- vs. • Life-time ratings (40+ years) asset class-specific • Timely payment of interest and/or systemic issues & ultimate payment of principal 27
  • 28. TIMELAG of RATING ACTIONS Number of Global SF Bond Downgrades by CRA 190,000 180,000 170,000 176,046 160,000 150,000 TOTAL S&P Moody's Fitch 140,000 130,000 120,000 110,000 111,605 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 68,372 50,000 49,594 50,968 40,000 47,510 30,000 20,000 30,749 7,992 10,000 2,042 1,166 0 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 (Since January 2007 - Source: Bloomberg) 28
  • 29. Regional problem GLOBAL IMPACT Number of Global SF Bond Downgrades by Region 190,000 180,000 170,000 175,208 160,000 150,000 TOTAL Europe US 140,000 130,000 120,000 110,000 111,239 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 68,073 50,000 40,000 49,160 50,676 47,284 30,000 20,000 30,597 7,981 10,000 2,035 1,161 0 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 (Since January 2007 - Source: Bloomberg) 29
  • 30. OPERATIONAL RISKS • Changing methodologies and assumptions • Timeliness of rating decisions • Model risks • Striking the right balance between non- and over-regulation 30
  • 31. RISK MITIGANTS • Understanding the meaning of ratings • Understanding instruments’ risks • Independent analysis • Internal ratings • Disputing rating decisions and methodologies with the agencies – is it really worth it? • Operational risk scenario: Awareness that agencies CAN and DO get their ratings wrong 31
  • 33. QUESTION 7: Would you now give CRAs more or less credit ? More Less Less More 70% 30% 33
  • 34. CONTACT Markus Krebsz +44 (0) 79 85 065 045 krebsz@web.de markus.krebsz@4-most.co.uk 4most Linen Hall 162-168 Regents Street London, W1B 5TE Tel. +44 (0) 207 038 3690 www.4-most.co.uk
  • 35. ANNEX: Ratings & Probability of Default (PD) 1 year 5 year 10 year Moodys S&P Fitch Moodys S&P Fitch Moodys S&P Fitch Aaa 0.00% AAA 0.00% 0.00% Aaa 0.18% AAA 0.10% 0.11% Aaa 0.40% AAA 0.45% 0.37% Aa1 0.00% AA+ 0.00% 0.00% Aa1 0.15% AA+ 0.16% 0.11% Aa1 0.25% AA+ 0.34% 0.47% Aa2 0.00% AA 0.00% 0.00% Aa2 0.28% AA 0.15% 0.14% Aa2 0.67% AA 0.77% 0.68% Aa3 0.00% AA- 0.02% 0.01% Aa3 0.18% AA- 0.52% 0.25% Aa3 0.33% AA- 1.11% 0.91% A1 0.00% A+ 0.05% 0.02% A1 0.38% A+ 0.64% 0.41% A1 0.84% A+ 1.68% 1.30% A2 0.03% A 0.04% 0.04% A2 0.68% A 0.42% 0.57% A2 1.69% A 1.80% 1.78% A3 0.03% A- 0.04% 0.04% A3 0.65% A- 0.86% 0.75% A3 1.69% A- 2.44% 1.91% Baa1 0.17% BBB+ 0.22% 0.22% Baa1 1.46% BBB+ 2.30% 1.82% Baa1 2.31% BBB+ 4.65% 3.82% Baa2 0.12% BBB 0.28% 0.21% Baa2 2.11% BBB 2.17% 2.14% Baa2 5.49% BBB 5.27% 5.61% Baa3 0.41% BBB- 0.39% 0.42% Baa3 3.60% BBB- 4.94% 4.03% Baa3 7.20% BBB- 8.97% 8.23% Ba1 0.66% BB+ 0.56% 0.63% Ba1 6.76% BB+ 6.47% 6.19% Ba1 12.38% BB+ 11.74% 12.25% Ba2 0.62% BB 0.95% 0.90% Ba2 8.82% BB 9.98% 8.37% Ba2 14.66% BB 17.34% 17.08% Ba3 2.23% BB- 1.76% 2.05% Ba3 19.14% BB- 15.03% 15.92% Ba3 36.24% BB- 24.97% 30.27% B1 3.03% B+ 3.01% 3.10% B1 25.27% B+ 20.86% 21.53% B1 47.43% B+ 30.15% 38.18% B2 5.93% B 8.34% 7.24% B2 31.24% B 29.44% 27.84% B2 44.48% B 36.29% 41.06% B3 10.77% B- 12.15% 11.71% B3 43.55% B- 37.71% 39.23% B3 62.32% B- 45.05% 53.69% Caa-C 22.24% CCC/C 28.83% 25.54% Caa-C 60.40% CCC/C 50.85% 53.55% Caa-C 78.81% CCC/C 56.45% 65.07% 35