The UK Research Councils will deliver through the GCRF £1.5b in research grants for international development research over the next five years. This funding is new and additional to existing sources of research support like DFID, the Newton Fund, etc., which will continue. The GCRF represents the largest single boost to research council funding in their history and will create an entirely new stream of development research funding across arts, humanities, social and natural sciences, with particular opportunities for interdisciplinary research.

1. Global Challenges Research Fund

2. RCUK International Champion
Professor Jane Elliott
CEO, Economic and Social Research
Council
RCUK International Champion
Research Council lead for
• Newton Fund
• Global Challenge Research Fund
• RCUK Overseas Offices
• Science Europe

3. CONTEXT

4. Global Challenges Research Fund
Cutting edge research which
addresses the problems
faced by developing
countries
2015 Government Spending Review Outcomes
 Address global challenges
through disciplinary and
interdisciplinary research
 Strengthening capability
for research and
innovation, within both UK
and developing countries
 Agile response to
emergencies and
opportunities

5. UK Context
UK Aid Strategy
 Strengthening global peace, security and
governance
 Strengthening resilience and response to
crises
 Promoting global prosperity
 Tackling extreme poverty and helping the
world’s most vulnerable

6. Global Context

7. Current RCUK Portfolio
• Active participation in Newton
• Significant and growing portfolio
of ODA research
• Strong clusters of excellence
with high engagement in
developing world issues
• Communities with untapped
potential to contribute

8. INVESTMENT STRATEGY
Setting the context

9. GCRF allocation
(4th March 2016)

10. Global Grand Challenges
Global Challenge
Research
Current 2015/16
Non-ODA ODA
Disciplinary
Interdisciplinary
RCUK Themes
Energy
Global Uncertainties
Living With Environmental Change
Lifelong Health and Well Being
Global Food Security
Digital Economy
~£460M
Newton
Fund
~£30M
(£75M BIS)
Non-
Newton
ODA
~£86M

11. Global Grand Challenges
Global Grand
Challenge
Target 2020/21
Non-ODA ODA
Disciplinary
Interdisciplinary
Council(s)
Challenge
Programmes
(£?M)
Global Challenge Fund
(£100M-£415M)
~£492M BIS
RCUK
Grand
Challenge
TBD
Newton
Fund
(£150M
BIS)
Non-
Newton
ODA
~£135M

12. Strategy for future investment
CORE
Areas with a strong UK research community, closely engaged with developing world challenges,
often actively engaged with UK and international partners and making a significant global
contribution. Examples include infectious diseases, crops for developing world, development
studies.
STRETCH
Areas with a strong research community, but not strongly orientated to developing world contexts,
examples include clean energy or industrial biotechnology where the opportunity for developing
world is considerable but nascent.
Also renewal and growth in capability through targeted new blood and early career investment.
Careful consideration of the opportunities and implications of supporting new capability overseas.
TRANSFORMATIONAL
All challenge topics benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. However, it is particularly suited to
multidimensional “wicked” challenges seeking new insights or needing radical approaches.
Examples include the consequences for developing world of climate change, demographic shifts,
economic development, rapid urbanisation and conflict.

13. Our Proposal to BIS
Forward investment profile

14. FUTURE PLANS

15. Global Challenges (draft)
Health Clean Energy Sustainable Agriculture
To tackle diseases, strengthen health
systems and reach the worlds most
vulnerable.
To provide access to clean energy,
including new technologies and the
behavioural insights required for
successful introduction to developing
countries.
To improve nutrition and food security,
support technological innovation, and
increase resilience to climate change
Conflict & humanitarian action
Foundations for Economic
Development
Other potential topics
New insights and approaches for
preventing conflict and violence, build
stability and strengthen humanitarian
action.
To understand what works best for
developing countries to build the
foundations for economic development -
macroeconomics, institutions, innovation
and private sector growth, cities and
infrastructure, education systems, jobs and
skills.
Resilient systems
Mass Migration and Refugee
Crises
Challenge categories align with research priorities of
UK Department for International Development

16. RCUK Global Challenge Research Fund
Strategic Advisory Group
To advise RCUK on:
• engagement with research and
stakeholder communities and the
facilitation of new ideas and
opportunities
• the development of a strategic research
agenda and prioritisation of challenge
topics
• the effectiveness of RCUK strategies
and mechanisms, including mechanisms
to build capability where it is needed to
address existing deficits.
• integration of ODA and non-ODA
challenge research, where this is
sensible to do so
• the allocation of research funding,
consistent with the Haldane principle.
Strategic Advisory Group
• Reflect the breadth of disciplines across
Research Councils UK
• Diverse across career stages and life
course
• Drawn from academe, government,
business and international stakeholders
Individuals who can demonstrate:
• Excellence in research
• Achievement through interdisciplinary
working
• Commitment to global development
challenges

17. Growing capability and changing culture
… to meet development needs
 Enabling broader, deeper and
more effective academic
engagement with the
development agenda
 Updating Pathways to Impact
to emphasise impacts on
developing world
 Research base capacity building:
– new faces, new blood, early career
 Strengthening international partnerships:
growing overseas capability

18. PATHWAYS TO IMPACT
Securing benefit for the developing world

19. Pathways to Impact
RCUK
Research
Translation
Innovation
Development
Action &
Impact
Challenges, problems, contexts

20. Pathways to Impact
Stakeholder roles
UK Academies
UK Stakeholders
(Government, Charities, Business)
International Stakeholders
(Universities, Charities, UN, NGO, Overseas Governments)
GCRF
RCUK
Research
Translation
Innovation
Development
Action &
Impact

21. Pathways to impact
… on the developing world
Impacts from research are always uncertain, often
unexpected and cannot be guaranteed – this includes
impacts on developing world.
The likelihood of impact is increased:
• If the research is orientated towards real world problems and
challenges
• If stakeholders that are close to the problem, or have a mandate to
implement any solutions, are involved in the progression of the
research
• If the academics and research team are motivated to achieve impact
and benefit.

22. Pathway to impact
Official Development Assistance
Research is not aid. However, “research directly and primarily
relevant to the problems of developing countries may be
counted as ODA. The costs may still be counted as ODA if the
research is carried out in a developed country.”
The limits and protocols for RCUK ODA assessment have
evolved through case law and precedent.
A new approach to ODA reporting by Research Councils is
required.
From To
Post-hoc assessment and reporting
by RC officials
ODA appraisal embedded within
proposal process and peer review.
Tacit development priorities
Explicit research challenges through
community engagement
Good practices within specific
disciplines and programmes
Mainstreamed across RCUK portfolio
Scheme and theme specific guidance
on development issues
Generic guidance around
development and pathways to impact
Increased academic commitment to
development goals

23. Strengthening pathways to impact
within developing countries
• Building research capacity and
collaborations with academics in
developing countries
• Building partnerships and
collaborative links with
NGOs/charities/civil society in
developing countries
• Developing further collaborative
opportunities to strengthen
international links (including Newton,
DfID, Commonwealth etc)
“doing things
with people and
not simply for or
to them”

24. CAUTIONARY THOUGHTS

25. Competences needed
to deliver this agenda:
• Able to identify global challenges that are tractable through
research
• Able to demonstrate a new approach to ODA compliance
• Grow capability in UK research base and overseas, to
achieve global development goals
• Deliver interdisciplinary research
• Achieve pathways to impact that extend to the developing
world
• Research Councils to operate as an integrated delivery
organisation as envisaged by Sir Paul Nurse

26. Systemic risks
Risk Mitigation
If Research Council approach to ODA
compliance is challenged, we may need to
terminate research grants
Develop a new approach to ODA
compliance, including greater engagement
from researchers
Build competence in ODA assessment within
Research UK and universities
If the balance between ODA and non-ODA
funding starts to distort the pattern of
research funding, we could lose important
opportunities UK needs
Councils to be alert to this issue, which is
likely to manifest itself for particular sub-
disciplines.
If GCRF funding is not sustained through
future Spending Reviews, Research
Councils could be left with ~£1Bn in liabilities
Ensure BIS and Treasury understand
downstream implications of the GCRF
funding profile.

27. UK Aid Strategy
Additional requirements
All departments spending ODA
will be required to put in place a
clear plan to ensure that their
programme design, quality
assurance, approval,
contracting and procurement,
monitoring, reporting and
evaluation processes represent
international best practice.

28. International Commission
for Aid Impact
The independent scrutiny body
for UK development assistance.
• undertakes reviews of UK aid
and its contribution to
development results.
• independent of government -
reports to the International
Development Committee.
• works closely with the
spending departments
throughout the review process
• Publishes reports to support
public engagement with the aid
programme.

29. Questions for discussion
How might we work together to make
the case for unallocated GCRF?
Examples of good (best) practices
– Interdisciplinary approaches
– Capability building UK & overseas
– Critical mass, networks, people
– Building global partnerships
What are the global challenges?
How might we strengthen pathways to impact?