evaluation tool

1. 1
Business Laboratory Research and Development Center (BLRDC)
EVALUATION TOOL
For
SSS & PSA CAMPAIGN
Submitted by:
Group 8−3rd
and 4th
Year BSBA
Checked by:
RALPH H. CELESTE, DBM
BA FACULTY
ST. MARY’S COLLEGE BAGANGA, INC.
Conception Street, Baganga
Davao Oriental
3rd
YEAR BSBA
ENRIQUEZ, SHIELLO F
DONGIAPON, ERICA JEAN
MORALES, ANA N.
GA, KHAMILLA
PAGUYAN, NILA
BAGAY, CHRISTINE MAE
PANDILI PAOLO
CAPALIT, KENN
EMUY, RODEL
4TH
YEAR BSBA
GUIWAN, LORNA
ITLANAS, JOELYN
ILIGAN, IMELDA
CANETE, CRISLIE
DUAY, CRISTY
CUBERO, MARY GRACE
DONGA, JERELL
LINSAG REABELL
LINSAG CLAUDINE
LANCIAN, MARK DONALD

2. 2
The SSS and PSA activity was conducted in Barangay Mahan Ub, Baganga Davao
Oriental. It was attended by fifty-four (54) participants age above 18 to below 60, basically they
were students, and household of the barangay. Below is the evaluation form used to evaluate
the performance of the 3rd
and 4th
Year group 8 students in conducting the activity.
Evaluation form
Date: Barangay: Cellphone number:
SECTION A (SEKSYON A)
Date (Petsa): Barangay:______________________ Cellphone Number:_______
SECTION B (SEKSYON B)
Put a check on the desired box.(Butangi og tsek ang gusto nga kahon.)
ORIENTATION COMMENT
(KOMENTO SA ORYENTASYON)
Strongly
Agree
(Hugot
nga
Pag-
uyon)
-5-
Agree
(Pag-
uyon)
-4-
Neutral
(Neyutral)
-3-
Disagree
(Dili
Mooyun)
-2-
Strongly
Disagree
(Hugot
nga Dili
Mooyun)
-1-
1. The venue was adequate and convenient.
(Ang venue igo ug kombenyente.)
2. Communication to attend the orientation was
effective and timeous. (Ang komunikasyon
aron makatambong sa oryentasyon epektibo
ug tukma sa panahon.)
3. The timing of the orientation was
suitable.(Haom ang tayming sa orientasyon.)
4. Presenters were efficient and friendly. (Ang
mga presenter episyente ug mahigalaon.)
5. Presenters demonstrated comprehensive
knowledge of their topics.(Gipakita sa mga
presenter ang komprehensibo nga kahibalo
sa ilang mga hilisgutan.)
6. SSS application and processing was clearly
articulated.(Ang aplikasyon ug pagproseso
sa SSS klaro nga gipahayag.)
7. PSA application and processing was clearly
articulated.(Ang aplikasyon ug pagproseso
sa PSA klarong gipahayag.)
8. The orientation covered all the areas I
looked forward to hear. (Ang oryentasyon
naglangkob sa tanan nga mga lugar nga
akong gipaabut nga madungog.)
9. The proceedings showed good planning and
organization. (Ang mga proseso nagpakita
ug maayong pagplano ug organisasyon.)
10. Audio-visual media was used adequately.
(Ang audio-visual media gigamit nga igo.)
11. Overall facilitation of the orientation was
great. (Ang kinatibuk-ang pagpadali sa
oryentasyon maayo.)

3. 3
The table1 shows the rating scale used in measuring the level of satisfaction of the
participants towards the performance of the 3rd and 4th year BSBA students in conducting SSS
& PSA campaign.
Table 1. Rating Scale for the Respondents’ Responses on the SSS and PSA Campaign.
RANGE DESCRIPTIVE LEVEL INTERPRETATION
4.21-5.00 VERY HIGH
The participants are very satisfied in
SSS & PSA campaign in Barangay
Mahan-ub.
3.41-4.20 HIGH
The participants are satisfied in SSS &
PSA campaign in Barangay Mahan-Ub.
2.61-3.40 NEUTRAL
The participants are neither satisfied nor
not satisfied in SSS & PSA campaign in
Barangay Mahan-Ub.
1.81-2.60 LOW
The participants are not satisfied in SSS
& PSA campaign in Barangay Mahan-
Ub.
1.00-1.80 VERY LOW
The participants are not very satisfied in
SSS & PSA campaign in Barangay
Mahan-Ub.

4. 4
Table 2 below shows the summary of the participants’ responses towards the performance
of the BSBA 3rd
& 4th
year students of St. Mary’s College of Baganga, who conducted the SSS &
PSA campaign.
Table 2. Summary of the Participants’ Responses
Items
STANDARD
DEVIATION
MEAN
DESCRIPTIVE
LEVEL
The venue was adequate and convenient. 0.14 4.98 VERY HIGH
Communication to attend the orientation was
effective and timeous.
0 5 VERY HIGH
The timing of the orientation was suitable. 0.37 4.89 VERY HIGH
Presenters were efficient and friendly. 0.26 4.93 VERY HIGH
Presenters demonstrated comprehensive
knowledge of their topics
0.36 4.85 VERY HIGH
SSS application and processing was clearly
articulated.
0.39 4.87 VERY HIGH
PSA application and processing was clearly
articulated.
0.36 4.98 VERY HIGH
The orientation covered all the areas I looked
forward to hear
0.29 4.91 VERY HIGH
The proceedings showed good planning and
organization.
0.29 4.91 VERY HIGH
Audio-visual media was used adequately 0.29 4.91 VERY HIGH
Overall facilitation of the orientation was great. 0.19 4.96 VERY HIGH
Total Mean/ SD
0.14 4.93 VERY HIGH

5. 5
Table 2 shows the data for the Summary of Participants’ Responses which has total
weighted mean of 4.93, with the standard deviation of 0.14 or it is very high which revealed the
participants are very satisfied during the SSS & PSA campaign conducted in Barangay Mahan-
ub. Based on the participants’ responses that they are very satisfied in communication to attend
the orientation was effective and timeous with a weighted mean of 5.00 or very high.
For the second highest responses revealed that the venue was adequate and convenient
with a weighted mean of 4.98 or very high which is also interpreted that the participants are very
satisfied during the conduct of the campaign. Based on the participants’ responses that the PSA
application and processing was clearly articulated with a weighted mean of 4.98 or very high,
which means that the participants are very satisfied during the conduct of activity in Barangay
Mahan Ub.
Moreover, overall facilitation of the orientation was great with a weighted mean of 4.96 or
very high, and it is interpreted as very satisfied. When they were asking about the performance
of presenters demonstrated comprehensive knowledge of their topics it has a weighted mean of
4.85 or very high, which means that they very satisfied to the performance of the presenter.
They all expressed positive feedback about the overall performance of the BSBA students
and it is manifested that they are very satisfied in all aspect of the SSS and PSA Campaign
conducted by the 3rd
and 4th
Year BSBA students of St. Mary’s College Baganga, Inc.
Other concerns of the Participants:
A. WE ARE MEMBERS OF SSS BUT WE DON’T RECEIVE ANY I’D OVER 3 YEARS.
WHY IS THAT? (Mary Juna C. Nazareno, Maribel E. Cadalso, Antonio T.
Ignacio)
B. I HAVE A FIVE YEARS CONTRIBUTION OF SSS THROUGH MY CARD INC. CAN I
AVAIL MY SSS BENEFITS? (Vivian O. Matilac)
C. MY HUSBAND IS WORKING BEFORE IN A COMPANY, THE COMPANY TOLD US
THAT WE CAN AVAIL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS. BUT MANY MONTHS HAVE PASSED,
WE EVEN DON’T GET ANY BENEFITS FROM THEM. WHAT SHOULD I DO? (Sally
Gallardo)

6. 6
Table 3. Result on the SSS & PSA campaign
Respondents 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Mean
1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
2 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4.45
3 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.73
4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4.82
6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
7 4 5 3 5 5 4 7 4 4 5 5 4.64
8 5 5 4 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 4.73
9 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
11 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
12 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
13 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
14 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.73
15 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4.82
16 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4.82
17 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
18 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4.91
18 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
20 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
21 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
22 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
23 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
24 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
25 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
26 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
28 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
29 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
30 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
31 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
32 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
33 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
34 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
35 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
36 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
37 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
38 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
39 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4.55
40 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
41 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
42 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4.82
43 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
44 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
45 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
46 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
47 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4.73
48 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4.55
49 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4.82
50 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
51 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.91
52 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
53 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
54 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
Mean 4.98 5.00 4.89 4.93 4.85 4.87 4.98 4.91 4.91 4.91 4.96 4.93
sd 0.14 0.00 0.37 0.26 0.36 0.39 0.36 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.14