through these slides, Mahdi Modarres tries to show how the writing task 2 band descriptors are interpreted by a typical examiner and suggest how we may integrate writing activities with reading practice in our IELTS preparation courses.
through these slides, Mahdi Modarres tries to show how the writing task 2 band descriptors are interpreted by a typical examiner and suggest how we may integrate writing activities with reading practice in our IELTS preparation courses.
"How Write the "Specific Aims" and "The Rebuttal Letter" by Scott Filler, PhDUCLA CTSI
Scott Filler, PhD speaks on the topic of "How Write the "Specific Aims" Section of a Grant Application” and "The Rebuttal Letter" at the R Award Workshop on November 09, 2017 at UCLA.
"How Write the "Specific Aims" by Scott Filler, PhDUCLA CTSI
Scott Filler, PhD speaks on the topic of "How Write the "Specific Aims" Section of a Grant Application” and "The Rebuttal Letter" at the R Award Workshop on November 08, 2018 at UCLA.
Phoenix IELTS Academy- The best IELTS institute in Mohali- Presents to you the IELTS Writing Task 2 Question Types. Watch the video and clear your doubts regarding IELTS Writing Task 2. To know more, you can also read the article on writing pattern at https://goo.gl/qcxnzV
China and You - Medical Devices and IVDDs in the Worlds Second Biggest Economybrandwood
The story of the emerging opportunities in China for Medtech. This presentation by Brandwood Biomedical Head of China Operations Dr. Davey Han explores the rapidly changing market in CHina for medical products, the lessons for international manufacturers and the opportunities and success factors in the emerging China market.
"How Write the "Specific Aims" and "The Rebuttal Letter" by Scott Filler, PhDUCLA CTSI
Scott Filler, PhD speaks on the topic of "How Write the "Specific Aims" Section of a Grant Application” and "The Rebuttal Letter" at the R Award Workshop on November 09, 2017 at UCLA.
"How Write the "Specific Aims" by Scott Filler, PhDUCLA CTSI
Scott Filler, PhD speaks on the topic of "How Write the "Specific Aims" Section of a Grant Application” and "The Rebuttal Letter" at the R Award Workshop on November 08, 2018 at UCLA.
Phoenix IELTS Academy- The best IELTS institute in Mohali- Presents to you the IELTS Writing Task 2 Question Types. Watch the video and clear your doubts regarding IELTS Writing Task 2. To know more, you can also read the article on writing pattern at https://goo.gl/qcxnzV
China and You - Medical Devices and IVDDs in the Worlds Second Biggest Economybrandwood
The story of the emerging opportunities in China for Medtech. This presentation by Brandwood Biomedical Head of China Operations Dr. Davey Han explores the rapidly changing market in CHina for medical products, the lessons for international manufacturers and the opportunities and success factors in the emerging China market.
General guidelines for writing reaction papers (Read this documeJeanmarieColbert3
General guidelines for writing reaction papers
(Read this document fully! It’s 5 pages and contains important information):
Reaction papers are thought papers where you critique an article. As you read the assigned articles, point out 1) at least one interesting fact that you learned from the introduction, 2) study’s strengths, 3) the limitations of their research design (for example, the way they defined or measured their variables, the measures’ reliability/validity, their data collection technique [e.g., self-report, lab visits, direct observation]), 4) implications of their findings (so what do they findings mean in real world!. In your implications section you must relate the study’s findings to real life, and give it some context to make it relevant for lay people), 5) future direction ideas (what would you want to test next to build up on the findings of this research, and/or to address its shortcomings).
These are some questions to have in mind as you read the article:
· Did they account for confounding factors?
· What other factors could explain their findings?
· Were the findings substantial? Who will benefit from these?
· What were some of the considerations or little things that the researchers took into account that strengthened their design?
· If you were to do subsequent investigations, what next steps would you take?
· Also, if the article posed questions in your mind, mention the questions and take a stab at giving answers too!
Show me that you’ve thought the article thorough. I evaluate your reaction papers based on thedepth of your thoughts and how sophisticated and well explained your arguments comments are.
SUPER IMPORTANT NOTE regarding LIMITATIONS:
When pointing out the limitations, EXPLAIN how addressing the limitation could mean getting different results. For example, if the study’s participants are all socioeconomically advantaged and you see this a limitation because it’s not nationally representative, discuss how results of a mid/low SES sample could be different. Simply saying that the results aren’t “generalizable” IS NOT ENOUGH. You must justify your argument for selecting a more diverse sample, otherwise there is not enough evidence to suggest that the study’s findings are not generalizable! Again, please realize that it is your explanations and arguments that I evaluate, so don’t leave your comments unexplained or unsupported.
SUPER IMPORTANT NOTE regarding STRENGHTS:
I have found that students are often confused as to what they should consider a “strength” and what things are just “given (must haves!)” in a work that is published in an academic journal. Below are things that are NOT strengths, and rather “given”, so please don’t include these as strengths of the article! Violation of these can be considered a limitation:
· Random assignment
· Having conditions that differ on only one aspect
· Coders being blind to the study’s hypotheses
· Use of reliable and valid measures
· Citing relevant pri ...
Scoring Guide for Rhetorical Analysis (10 of grade; 100 po.docxaryan532920
Scoring Guide for Rhetorical Analysis (10% of grade; 100 points)
The scoring guide helps you and your instructor see some of the specific ways your writing is matching expectations. No rubric can encompass everything a piece of writing can or
needs to accomplish, so your instructor will comment both about and beyond these categories to help you understand how this piece of writing is effective and how it (or future pieces)
could be more effective. Your grade will be determined by your instructor’s overall evaluation of this piece of writing and the revision process it enjoyed, with the top three categories
carrying more weight than the bottom three. Note: If for any category, the piece does not meet “Developing” standards, your instructor will assign no credit for that category.
KHO/16
Categories Excellent (A) Effective (B) Adequate (C) Developing (D)
Invention and
Purpose
Provides exceptional detail, depth,
and clarity about the effects of one or
two specific elements (e.g., patterns,
rhetorical strategies, audience,
purpose); interesting, sophisticated
argument develops through the paper
Provides solid detail, depth, and clarity
about the the effects of one or two
specific elements (e.g., patterns,
rhetorical strategies, audience,
purpose); solid argument develops as
the paper progresses
Provides some detail and clarity about
the effects of one or two specific
elements (e.g., patterns, rhetorical
strategies, audience, author, purpose);
consistent argument
Provides little detail, depth, or clarity
about the effects of specific elements,
may attempt to discuss many
elements without depth; may use
terms inaccurately; confusing, vague,
or inconsistent argument
Arrangement
and Audience
Awareness
Arrangement enhances the central
idea; intro intrigues readers, provides
helpful context, and prepares readers
well; sophisticated transitions guide
readers; conclusion refines thesis,
provides a satisfying resolution
Arrangement supports the central idea
and its development; intro provides
context and prepares readers well;
effective transitions guide readers;
conclusion recasts thesis and provides
a satisfying resolution
Arrangement mostly supports the
central idea; intro provides limited
context or reader preparation;
transitions formulaic or not always
effective; conclusion merely repeats
thesis or provides little resolution
Arrangement doesn’t consistently
support the central idea; intro provides
little context or reader preparation;
transitions missing or ineffective;
relationship among ideas unclear;
conclusion off-topic or underdeveloped
Ethos and
Evidence
Evidence and overall content easily
convince the reader that the author is
credible and that the analysis is valid;
evidence fully supports or enhances
writer’s claims
Evidence and overall content convince
the reader that the author is credible
and that the analysis is valid; evidence
supports writ ...
Discussion Rubric Graduate Your active participation i.docxpetehbailey729071
Discussion Rubric: Graduate
Your active participation in the discussion forums is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions are designed to help you make meaningful
connections between the course content and the larger concepts and goals of the course. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own
thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance.
Requirements for Discussion Board Assignments
Students are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment.
For your initial post (1), you must do the following:
Compose a post of one to two paragraphs.
In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time.
In Modules Two through Ten, complete the initial post by Thursday at
11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Take into consideration material such as course content and other
discussion boards from the current module and previous modules, when
appropriate.
Reference scholarly or peer-reviewed sources to support your discussion
points, as appropriate (using proper citation methods for your discipline).
For your response posts (2), you must do the following:
Reply to at least two different classmates outside of your own initial post
thread.
In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time.
In Modules Two through Ten, complete the response posts by Sunday at
11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating “I agree” or
“You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in each discussion prompt.
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value
Comprehension Develops an initial post with an
organized, clear point of view or
idea using rich and significant
detail (100%)
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea using
appropriate detail (90%)
Develops an initial post with a
point of view or idea but with
some gaps in organization and
detail (70%)
Does not develop an initial post
with an organized point of view
or idea (0%)
20
Timeliness Submits initial post on time
(100%)
Submits initial post one day late
(70%)
Submits initial post two or more
days late (0%)
10
Engagement Provides relevant and
meaningful response posts with
clarifying explanation and detail
(100%)
Provides relevant response posts
with some explanation and
detail (90%)
Provides somewhat relevant
response posts with some
explanation and detail (70%)
Provides response posts that are
generic with little explanation or
detail (0%)
20
Critical Thinking Draws insightful conclusions that
are thoroughly defended with
evidence and examples (100%)
Draws informed conclusions that
are justified with evidence (90%)
Draws logical conclusions (70%) Does not draw logic.
General guidelines for writing reaction papers (Read this docume.docxgilbertkpeters11344
General guidelines for writing reaction papers
(Read this document fully! It’s 5 pages and contains important information):
Reaction papers are thought papers where you critique an article. As you read the assigned articles, point out 1) at least one interesting fact that you learned from the introduction, 2) study’s strengths, 3) the limitations of their research design (for example, the way they defined or measured their variables, the measures’ reliability/validity, their data collection technique [e.g., self-report, lab visits, direct observation]), 4) implications of their findings (so what do they findings mean in real world!. In your implications section you must relate the study’s findings to real life, and give it some context to make it relevant for lay people), 5) future direction ideas (what would you want to test next to build up on the findings of this research, and/or to address its shortcomings).
These are some questions to have in mind as you read the article:
· Did they account for confounding factors?
· What other factors could explain their findings?
· Were the findings substantial? Who will benefit from these?
· What were some of the considerations or little things that the researchers took into account that strengthened their design?
· If you were to do subsequent investigations, what next steps would you take?
· Also, if the article posed questions in your mind, mention the questions and take a stab at giving answers too!
Show me that you’ve thought the article thorough. I evaluate your reaction papers based on thedepth of your thoughts and how sophisticated and well explained your arguments comments are.
SUPER IMPORTANT NOTE regarding LIMITATIONS:
When pointing out the limitations, EXPLAIN how addressing the limitation could mean getting different results. For example, if the study’s participants are all socioeconomically advantaged and you see this a limitation because it’s not nationally representative, discuss how results of a mid/low SES sample could be different. Simply saying that the results aren’t “generalizable” IS NOT ENOUGH. You must justify your argument for selecting a more diverse sample, otherwise there is not enough evidence to suggest that the study’s findings are not generalizable! Again, please realize that it is your explanations and arguments that I evaluate, so don’t leave your comments unexplained or unsupported.
SUPER IMPORTANT NOTE regarding STRENGHTS:
I have found that students are often confused as to what they should consider a “strength” and what things are just “given (must haves!)” in a work that is published in an academic journal. Below are things that are NOT strengths, and rather “given”, so please don’t include these as strengths of the article! Violation of these can be considered a limitation:
· Random assignment
· Having conditions that differ on only one aspect
· Coders being blind to the study’s hypotheses
· Use of reliable and valid measures
· Citing relevant pri.
General guidelines for writing reaction papers (Read this docume.docxshericehewat
General guidelines for writing reaction papers
(Read this document fully! It’s 5 pages and contains important information):
Reaction papers are thought papers where you critique an article. As you read the assigned articles, point out 1) at least one interesting fact that you learned from the introduction, 2) study’s strengths, 3) the limitations of their research design (for example, the way they defined or measured their variables, the measures’ reliability/validity, their data collection technique [e.g., self-report, lab visits, direct observation]), 4) implications of their findings (so what do they findings mean in real world!. In your implications section you must relate the study’s findings to real life, and give it some context to make it relevant for lay people), 5) future direction ideas (what would you want to test next to build up on the findings of this research, and/or to address its shortcomings).
These are some questions to have in mind as you read the article:
· Did they account for confounding factors?
· What other factors could explain their findings?
· Were the findings substantial? Who will benefit from these?
· What were some of the considerations or little things that the researchers took into account that strengthened their design?
· If you were to do subsequent investigations, what next steps would you take?
· Also, if the article posed questions in your mind, mention the questions and take a stab at giving answers too!
Show me that you’ve thought the article thorough. I evaluate your reaction papers based on thedepth of your thoughts and how sophisticated and well explained your arguments comments are.
SUPER IMPORTANT NOTE regarding LIMITATIONS:
When pointing out the limitations, EXPLAIN how addressing the limitation could mean getting different results. For example, if the study’s participants are all socioeconomically advantaged and you see this a limitation because it’s not nationally representative, discuss how results of a mid/low SES sample could be different. Simply saying that the results aren’t “generalizable” IS NOT ENOUGH. You must justify your argument for selecting a more diverse sample, otherwise there is not enough evidence to suggest that the study’s findings are not generalizable! Again, please realize that it is your explanations and arguments that I evaluate, so don’t leave your comments unexplained or unsupported.
SUPER IMPORTANT NOTE regarding STRENGHTS:
I have found that students are often confused as to what they should consider a “strength” and what things are just “given (must haves!)” in a work that is published in an academic journal. Below are things that are NOT strengths, and rather “given”, so please don’t include these as strengths of the article! Violation of these can be considered a limitation:
· Random assignment
· Having conditions that differ on only one aspect
· Coders being blind to the study’s hypotheses
· Use of reliable and valid measures
· Citing relevant pri ...
Preparing for the AssessmentMN7367 Week 7 Lecture 1Anne-.docxharrisonhoward80223
Preparing for the Assessment
MN7367 Week 7 Lecture 1
Anne-marie Greene
1
Brewis, Jo (Prof.) (BJ() - Add module code and name here
Your assessment
Part 1
Essay Assignment
50% of overall mark
Part 2
Unseen Examination
50% of overall mark
A Two-Headed Monster?
Essay Assignment 2017
The ability of HRM to lead to improved organisational performance is contingent on achieving a fit between business strategy and HRM practice. Discuss the validity of this statement with specific reference to two HRM practices.
As a business operating in markets all around the world, we believe diversity brings benefits for our customers, our business and our people. We want a connected workforce that reflects the communities where we operate and helps us meet the needs of customers from all walks of life. Different ideas and perspectives help us innovate, manage risk, and grow the business in a sustainable way…Diversity and inclusion is part of who we are at HSBC. It is vital to the future of our business (HSBC Bank). Consider this recent organisational statement on diversity and discuss the rationale for attention to equality and diversity issues within human resource management, reflecting on both business case and moral/social justice cases.
Sociologists tend to see conflict as normal part of organisational functioning. Consider the implications of this view for the management of people within organisations, with specific reference to two HRM practices.
Discuss whether you agree with the view which sees that ‘the importance of HRM lies not in the objective reality of its normative models and their implementation, but in the… reality of its rhetoric… redefining the meaning of work and the way individual employees relate to their employers.’ (Legge, 2005: 123)
Most mainstream HRM research starts from the premise of there being a generic, universal worker. Discuss the extent to which you agree with this statement, reflecting on the factors that determine an organisation’s approach to HRM?
‘A core managerial belief appears to be that not only is managing through the payment system the most appropriate means of managing human resources, but that the existence of a payment system is also sufficient for managing human resources’. Discuss this statement, looking at the centrality of payment systems within, and the common problems faced in performance management.
Essay Assignment
3,000 word essay (+/- 10%)
Selection of ONE essay question ONLY from a possible selection of six.
Deadline Tuesday 12th December 2017.
A penalty of 10% of the available marks will be imposed if a student misses the above deadline
A further penalty of 5% will be imposed for every ten subsequent working days the submission is late.
Submit the Assignment via the Turnitin link on BB
Q from seminar 1: Turnitin: can I submit my essay and check for plagiarism?
A: No, this is not allowed. You must avoid plagiarism from the beginning and before you submit.
Answer the quest.
SOCI 403 Social ChangeAmerican Public University SystemWri.docxjensgosney
SOCI 403 Social Change
American Public University System
Written Assignment Four: Final Paper (Due Week 8)
IMPORTANT NOTE: This assignment is due in Week 8 to give you ample time to explore our class topics and create a thorough and informed paper. It must be turned in by 11:55 pm (EST) on Sunday of Week 8. Because this is the end of class, NO EXTENSIONS can be given for this paper. When class ends, all assignments must be in! Please plan your time carefully and turn this paper in early if at all possible.
In this assignment, you will construct a 10-12 page final research paper. Your paper should utilize sound critical thought and it should provide appropriate APA in-text citations and APA full-reference citations. The overall assignment is worth 20% of your final course grade. Be sure to read the directions for Submitting the Assignment.
Your paper will adhere to the general standards of the APA-formatting guidelines. It will include a title page, a short abstract, body of paper (Introduction/Thesis, Analysis, Application of Research, Summary and Conclusion) and a reference page. Comment by mothertao: Where the APA guidelines and the rules of this assignment diverge, stick to the rules of the assignment.
The Purdue Online Writing Lab offers information about APA guidelines and formatting:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
This site offers you answers to the most frequently asked questions on APA style as well as other useful APA information:
http://www.apastyle.org/learn/faqs/index.aspx
ALL Written assignments (i.e. Your Paper assignments) must be submitted TWICE: 1) Through the Sakai assignment submission link, and 2) Through www.turnitin.com. See Turnitin.com Directions
Format, Length and Content of Paper:
Title (First whole page of paper)
Abstract (Separate page)
Body of Paper: (10 -12 pages total) Clearly mark each part of the body of your paper with the following four section headings. Watch the page requirements carefully as you will be graded on them.
I. Introduction and Thesis Questions/Statement (1 page):
Introduce your topic and explain its relevance to you personally. Summarize the significance of this topic for others (e.g., the reader, groups, society). Describe the research questions that will guide your inquiry or the thesis statement that you will explore.
II. Analysis Using Concepts/Theories (2 – 3 pages):
Clearly and significantly apply at least five concepts/theories from our text to your research topic. While this sounds like what you did in Assignment One, this is no longer an exploration of how these might apply. Rather, these applications should be strong and well-supported in the final draft.
III. Application of Research (6 - 7 pages):
Clearly and significantly apply findings from at least 8 meaningful, up-to-date resources, 5 of which are from reputable academic journals. Your research in Assignment Two should help you with this, but remember that the final pape.
TOPIC Write an original research report consisting of one of the .docxturveycharlyn
TOPIC: Write an original research report consisting of one of the following topic areas:
2) Network Organizations, 3) Spin-out Organizations, 4) Ambidextrous Organizations, 5) Front-Back Organizations, 6) Sense and Response Organizations.
.
4. Each student submission will be checked for plagiarism. Warning... Turnitin has a very good and historical memory and is capable of accessing reports from both internal and external resources (i.e. Universities, Governments, etc.) including those originally written in non-English languages.
5. Only one submission attempt is permitted – BE SURE BEFORE YOU HIT ENTER. Plagiarism will result in a grade of zero (non-negotiable) for the assignment and may results in other university actions. The department chairperson will be notified of the violation.
6. Acceptable file formats for submissions include Microsoft Word (doc, docx) or Adobe Acrobat (PDF). Other formats are not acceptable.
7. The research paper must be at least 2,500 words supported by evidence (citations from peer-reviewed sources).
8. A minimum of four (4) peer-reviewed journal citations are required.
9. Formatting should be double-spaced, one-inch boarders, no extra space for headings, no extra white space, no more than two levels of heading, page numbers, front and back matter).
10.Extra white space use to enhance page count will negatively affect student grade.
11.Focus for the research paper:
a. Describe, compare / contrast, and evaluate two (2) database implementations in your field of interest. You may also want to consider referencing journal case studies.
b. The first implementation should be a database that was essentially successful
c. The second implementation should be a database that had significant "challenges"
d. The databases may either be ones with which you are personally familiar or ones that are reported in the literature
e. Be sure to go well beyond just personal opinion in your analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Student submissions must be anchor in peer reviewed literature.
12.As a graduate student, you are expected to be proficient in the use of the English language. Errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax will affect student grade. As your professor, I will not provide remedial help for writing problems. If you are unable to write clearly and correctly, I urge you to contact the program office for sources of remedial help.
Some students have asked for a sample or recommended outline. While I cannot provide samples of previous work, I have provided a general outline that you may refer to. The outline below may only be used as a very general guide and is “NOT” a subject that can be selected. Also, keep in mind the research paper needs to be scholarly and derived from peer-reviewed literature. Citations are required.
The following outline (unrelated to the subject matter of the research report) may help in your understanding of the research report via analysis & synthesis ...
BA 308Writing Assignment #1 ProblemOpportunity Identification.docxwilcockiris
BA 308
Writing Assignment #1: Problem/Opportunity Identification
This term, your team will be writing a proposal to an important partner, The Lundquist College of Business Executive Council on Experiential Learning & Leadership (ExCELL) to address a critical project to be implemented in Fall 2018. For this assignment, you will write a memo that focuses on a specific constituency and a problem on which you would like to focus. Ultimately, you will try to convince your teammates they should adopt your choice of constituency and community issue for your team’s proposal project.
The Executive Council on Experiential Learning & Leadership (ExCELL):
ExCEL is committed to the development of Experiential Learning & Leadership opportunities for LCB Students. They are looking for dynamic and innovative proposals that will help students develop leadership and communication skills outside of the traditional classroom setting. Their mission is to “Prepare students for the to be leaders in the workplace through experiential learning opportunities.”
Experiential learning is the process of learning (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. through experience (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and is more specifically defined as "learning through reflection on doing" Experiential learning is distinct from rote (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. or didactic (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. learning, in which the learner plays a comparatively passive role. It is related to, but not synonymous with, other forms of active learning (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. such as action learning (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., adventure learning (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., free-choice learning, cooperative learning (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., service-learning (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and situated learning (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Choosing a Problem/Constituency
With these criteria in mind, think creatively and broadly about leadership and experiential learning. For example, you might choose to focus on service-learning, project-based learning or outdoor education. Your task is not to come up with a solution to a problem, but rather to :
1. Describe a significant problem
2. Pick specific constituency (group of people) in the community and,
3. Provide evidence for the problem. For example, you might provide evidence for the following problems:
· Low career-readiness, job preparedness
· Lack of experience with leadership, communication or decision-making skills
· Physical of mental health of college students
Note that each of these problems has many possible solutions. That’s good. You’ll know that you have identified a problem instead of a solution when there are many possible ways to address it. We often make the mistake of offe.
Directions essay 3 Write a post-session summary based on the com.docxmariona83
Directions essay 3
Write a post-session summary based on the completed experience. Include the following:
1. Explain the two learning disciplines that you examined for this assessment: team learning and systems thinking.
2. Team exercise plan:
. Outline the schedule for your team development session. Include the job titles or roles of the team members participating in the session. List the scheduled meeting date and time.
. Describe the problem or issue you chose as the intended purpose for your team development session.
. Identify the learning discipline that you chose to focus on for your team exercise. Explain the process used to select that learning discipline, the rationale for its selection, and the team development exercise that you used with your team.
· Post-session summary:
. Describe your team development experience in a narrative format.
. Explain the successful and unsuccessful aspects of the team development exercise.
. Explain the lessons learned for team facilitation, including both planned and unplanned journeys that resulted.
. Explain the lessons learned for your chosen discipline, and its potential for helping a group examine itself, choose new direction, and commit to that direction.
DDDEEEHHH 111888000000 DDDeeennntttaaalll HHHyyygggiii eeennn eee 111
Informative Poster Research Paper Peer Evaluation Form
At the conclusion of each group project, please rate yourself and your team colleagues on regarding the relative
contributions that were made in preparing, submitting, and presenting your group project. Please be honest,
objective, constructive, and fair in your evaluation of yourself and your colleagues. Your ratings will not be
disclosed to other students. In rating yourself and your peers, using the following five-point scale, where:
5 = Always 4 = Most of the time 3 = Sometimes 2 = Seldom 1 = Never
Project or Paper Title: _________________________________________________________________
*Insert YOUR NAME IN THE FIRST COLUMN and those of your peers’ in the other spaces. (One name at the top of each column).
Names __________ __________ __________ __________ __________
Participated in discussions or
meetings
Contributed thoughtful research
germane to topic
Helped keep the group on the
task
Contributed useful ideas
Quantity of work done
Quality of work done
Shared equally in the work
Cooperated with colleagues
Made fair, considered decisions
re: direction of project and work
Deliverables on time, as promised
= = = = =
Total Score
Please take a moment to reflect, and answer the following questions.
1. Would you want to work with this group again? Why or why not?
2. In one sentence each; describe each team member’s contribution toward the project reaching completion?
Dental Hygiene 1 Informative Poster Research Paper Rubric for Evaluation (100 points poss.)
Qualities and C.
RESD 600Dr. Ling WangGrading Rubric for Research Proposa.docxaryan532920
RESD 600
Dr. Ling Wang
Grading Rubric for Research Proposal
Student Name:
For Quantitative Research Proposal
Category
Grade Points Allocated
Grade Points Earned
Research Problem
1. Is the problem clearly and precisely stated?
1
2. Is it of appropriate scope: i.e. sufficiently narrow and specific that it can be studied yet sufficiently rich that it will yield important theoretical or practical findings?
1
Review of Literature
1. Scope – does the review cite the important relevant literature?
1
2. Critique & Synthesis - Does the review adequately evaluate the literature rather than just summarize it?
2
3. Building a case from the literature – Does the review build a case for the significance of the problem, provide a theoretical framework for the problem, and support the need for studying the problem?
2
Statement of Purpose, Hypotheses or Questions
1. Is the purpose of the study clearly stated?
1
2. Are the hypotheses / research questions consistent with the problem statement and the theoretical rationale / framework?
1
3. Are the hypotheses /research questions operationally defined in such a way that data can be gathered to answer research questions (are the variables operationally defined?)
1
Methodology
1. Design: Is the design clear and is it appropriate to answer the questions asked?
2
2. Sampling: Is there a sufficient and clear description of the sample? What sampling method will be used? Is the sample representative of the target population (the group to whom the researcher wants to generalize)?
2
3. Measurement & data collection: Are the instruments AND procedures used for measuring variables and gathering data clearly stated? Is evidence of reliability and validity presented?
2
4. Data analysis techniques: Will statistical techniques be used to analyze the data? If so, are the techniques clearly and sufficiently described? Are the most appropriate techniques employed?
2
Potential Weaknesses
Are there any potential weaknesses or limitations in the overall design of the proposed study? Are weaknesses / limitations clearly stated?
1
Formatting
Is the formatting consistent with APA (6th edition)?
1
Total Points Earned
/20
Student Name:
For Qualitative Research Proposal
Category
Grade Points Allocated
Grade Points Earned
Introduction
1. Is the problem clearly and precisely stated?
1
2. Is the focus, purpose, or topic clearly stated?
1
3. Are the research questions well developed in consistency with the research problem?
2
4. Is it of appropriate scope: i.e. sufficiently narrow and specific that it can be studied yet sufficiently rich that it will yield important theoretical or practical findings?
1
Review of Literature
1. Scope – does the review cite the important relevant literature?
1
2. Critique & Synthesis - Does the review adequately evaluate the literature rather than just summarize it?
2
3. Building a case from the literature – Does the review build a case for the significance o ...
Assessment Task 1 Leadership Development ReportThis assessmen.docxdavezstarr61655
Assessment Task 1: Leadership Development Report
This assessment task is a REPORT.
This requires you to use a particular style of writing which involves both the way the report is structured and the way that you acknowledge other people’s ideas used in your work.
Your second step should be mastering the art of referencing. There are many styles of referencing in use in different disciplines and geographical locations.
HARVARD REFERENCING is required.
Remember: this current assessment task is a REPORT not an ESSAY.
The critical thinking element
We want you to be very comfortable with questioning everything you read and hear.
Anyone can remember facts and state other people’s views but a far more useful skill is to critically review what you read and hear and decide for yourself how reliable, accurate, applicable, contemporary, objective and fair it is.
In this report, your assessor will value the fact that you are able to see both benefits and deficiencies in a particular theory. Make sure you look through the critical thinking exercises in the course site to get a clear understanding of critical thinking!
How many references should I cite?
There is no right answer to this question because it all depends on what you write in your report. Some statements you make in your report will certainly need a reference to support them.
So, to determine how many references you need to cite, first (as described in the report writing tutorial) draw a mind map of ideas to go into your report and for each idea try to link it to a reference source.
How will the report be marked?
Your lecturers have already created a marking rubric that will be used to award you a mark out of 50 as the report comprises 50 of the overall 100 marks available in this course.
The rubric is reproduced over the page and will be used as a way of providing feedback to you on how you performed.
The most important thing about the rubric is that it DEFINES what you will be marked on. If you include additional material that is not mentioned in the rubric it will not attract any marks, if you forget to write about something listed in the rubric, you’ll lose marks.
So the rubric is like a “contract” between you and your lecturer. Following the rubric clearly is your best strategy for a good result
THE TASK
1. Explore the Central Michigan University competencies model (5 clusters eg. Self-Management, Leading others, Task management, Innovation and Social Responsibility)
2. Identify your current strengths and weaknesses as a leader (or potential leader) within the context of the CMU (eg. Create a clear vision of yourself in approx. 5-10 years time – only then will you be able to identify your strengths and weaknesses)
3. Review the leadership theories explored in this course and describe how they relate to you and your leadership development (again in the context of the CMU model eg. Blake and Mouton model grid)
4. Create a leadership development plan (*Starting point – Acti.
Assessment Task 1 Leadership Development ReportThis assessmen.docxfredharris32
Assessment Task 1: Leadership Development Report
This assessment task is a REPORT.
This requires you to use a particular style of writing which involves both the way the report is structured and the way that you acknowledge other people’s ideas used in your work.
Your second step should be mastering the art of referencing. There are many styles of referencing in use in different disciplines and geographical locations.
HARVARD REFERENCING is required.
Remember: this current assessment task is a REPORT not an ESSAY.
The critical thinking element
We want you to be very comfortable with questioning everything you read and hear.
Anyone can remember facts and state other people’s views but a far more useful skill is to critically review what you read and hear and decide for yourself how reliable, accurate, applicable, contemporary, objective and fair it is.
In this report, your assessor will value the fact that you are able to see both benefits and deficiencies in a particular theory. Make sure you look through the critical thinking exercises in the course site to get a clear understanding of critical thinking!
How many references should I cite?
There is no right answer to this question because it all depends on what you write in your report. Some statements you make in your report will certainly need a reference to support them.
So, to determine how many references you need to cite, first (as described in the report writing tutorial) draw a mind map of ideas to go into your report and for each idea try to link it to a reference source.
How will the report be marked?
Your lecturers have already created a marking rubric that will be used to award you a mark out of 50 as the report comprises 50 of the overall 100 marks available in this course.
The rubric is reproduced over the page and will be used as a way of providing feedback to you on how you performed.
The most important thing about the rubric is that it DEFINES what you will be marked on. If you include additional material that is not mentioned in the rubric it will not attract any marks, if you forget to write about something listed in the rubric, you’ll lose marks.
So the rubric is like a “contract” between you and your lecturer. Following the rubric clearly is your best strategy for a good result
THE TASK
1. Explore the Central Michigan University competencies model (5 clusters eg. Self-Management, Leading others, Task management, Innovation and Social Responsibility)
2. Identify your current strengths and weaknesses as a leader (or potential leader) within the context of the CMU (eg. Create a clear vision of yourself in approx. 5-10 years time – only then will you be able to identify your strengths and weaknesses)
3. Review the leadership theories explored in this course and describe how they relate to you and your leadership development (again in the context of the CMU model eg. Blake and Mouton model grid)
4. Create a leadership development plan (*Starting point – Acti ...
Presentation by Professor Simon Haslett at the University of Wales, Newport, Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) Writing Retreat Workshop at Gregynog Hall, Wales, on Wedmesday 11th May 2011. Simon Haslett is Professor of Physical Geography and Dean of the School of STEM at the University of Wales. He is also Visiting Professor of Pedagogic Research at the University of Wales, Newport.
Research Project IntroductionThis project will require you to sho.docxgholly1
Research Project Introduction:
This project will require you to show initiative, to work effectively in a group, and to do research on a chosen topic. It will require you to write an individual research paper, and do a group presentation on the topic.
Technology and Information Systems are constantly changing. It is important that you learn how to investigate and understand current and emerging trends throughout your career. This project will aid you in learning how to identify and synthesize multiple perspectives on important topics. It will also help you to appreciate and utilize the contributions of team members that will augment your own personal efforts.
The research project will involve two phases as described below.
1.
Identify a topic and write an individual research paper on that topic.
2.
Work with a group to do a group presentation in which one or more of you will highlight important findings from your research.
Part 1 Individual Paper:
If your paper is late, you will receive a 25% deduction per day.
Plagiarism detection will be enabled, you must put other source content into your own words. You will get zero points on the paper if too much (an excessive amount of) content is copied word for word from another source.
Topics that students can research on include but are not limited to:
Big Business Topics
·
IT Outsourcing
·
IT Security
·
Business Intelligence/DSS
·
App development
·
NoSQL
·
Data Warehousing
·
Salesforce
·
Investigate an Information System known as a CRM or an ERP
·
Virtualization
·
Software project management
·
Software product management
Small Entrepreneurial Business Topics
·
Search Engine Optimization
·
Link Building
·
Affiliate Marketing
·
Email Brokering
If you are interested in choosing a topic that is not on this list, the only requirement is that you find at least one other person to do the presentation with you on this topic.
Write this paper as if you were writing a structured report/letter to another person in this class who would be interested in this topic and would appreciate an overview of it. In considering what to write about, consider addressing many of the questions that an uninformed but curious person would have about this topic, such as:
What does the phrase that describes this topic mean?
How is work in this field conducted?
What are the major components of this topic?
Who are the major vendors involved (if any) and what are their product lines and how are they differentiated from other vendors?
How much money is involved with this field/topic?
What are the trade offs (pros and cons/risks) to consider within this topic?
If you wrote a tutorial on this topic, how would explain to another person how you do it?
Why did this field/topic come about? What preceded it?
Which individuals with which type of training are best situated to take advantage of the opportunities in this space?
Any other questions that you would ask about this topic as you dive into it. The t.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Implicitly or explicitly all competing businesses employ a strategy to select a mix
of marketing resources. Formulating such competitive strategies fundamentally
involves recognizing relationships between elements of the marketing mix (e.g.,
price and product quality), as well as assessing competitive and market conditions
(i.e., industry structure in the language of economics).
Company Valuation webinar series - Tuesday, 4 June 2024FelixPerez547899
This session provided an update as to the latest valuation data in the UK and then delved into a discussion on the upcoming election and the impacts on valuation. We finished, as always with a Q&A
B2B payments are rapidly changing. Find out the 5 key questions you need to be asking yourself to be sure you are mastering B2B payments today. Learn more at www.BlueSnap.com.
Improving profitability for small businessBen Wann
In this comprehensive presentation, we will explore strategies and practical tips for enhancing profitability in small businesses. Tailored to meet the unique challenges faced by small enterprises, this session covers various aspects that directly impact the bottom line. Attendees will learn how to optimize operational efficiency, manage expenses, and increase revenue through innovative marketing and customer engagement techniques.
LA HUG - Video Testimonials with Chynna Morgan - June 2024Lital Barkan
Have you ever heard that user-generated content or video testimonials can take your brand to the next level? We will explore how you can effectively use video testimonials to leverage and boost your sales, content strategy, and increase your CRM data.🤯
We will dig deeper into:
1. How to capture video testimonials that convert from your audience 🎥
2. How to leverage your testimonials to boost your sales 💲
3. How you can capture more CRM data to understand your audience better through video testimonials. 📊
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
What is the TDS Return Filing Due Date for FY 2024-25.pdfseoforlegalpillers
It is crucial for the taxpayers to understand about the TDS Return Filing Due Date, so that they can fulfill your TDS obligations efficiently. Taxpayers can avoid penalties by sticking to the deadlines and by accurate filing of TDS. Timely filing of TDS will make sure about the availability of tax credits. You can also seek the professional guidance of experts like Legal Pillers for timely filing of the TDS Return.
Kseniya Leshchenko: Shared development support service model as the way to ma...Lviv Startup Club
Kseniya Leshchenko: Shared development support service model as the way to make small projects with small budgets profitable for the company (UA)
Kyiv PMDay 2024 Summer
Website – www.pmday.org
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/startuplviv
FB – https://www.facebook.com/pmdayconference
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Recruiting in the Digital Age: A Social Media MasterclassLuanWise
In this masterclass, presented at the Global HR Summit on 5th June 2024, Luan Wise explored the essential features of social media platforms that support talent acquisition, including LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdfKaiNexus
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
The world of search engine optimization (SEO) is buzzing with discussions after Google confirmed that around 2,500 leaked internal documents related to its Search feature are indeed authentic. The revelation has sparked significant concerns within the SEO community. The leaked documents were initially reported by SEO experts Rand Fishkin and Mike King, igniting widespread analysis and discourse. For More Info:- https://news.arihantwebtech.com/search-disrupted-googles-leaked-documents-rock-the-seo-world/
Search Disrupted Google’s Leaked Documents Rock the SEO World.pdf
Djim workshop on peer review 2012
1. DJIM workshop
on Peer Review
Lara Killian (MA, MLIS 2010)
Journal of Library Innovation
(JOLI) Peer Reviewer, 2010-2012
DJIM Past Editorial Co-Chair
2008-2010 (Volumes 5 & 6)
19 Jan 2012
lara.killian@dal.ca
2. Why peer review?
Looks excellent on a résumé
Can help you evaluate your own work, keep
a better eye on overall coherence of
arguments, flow of writing
Gives you the opportunity to network within
the Faculty and get to know the review
process before you graduate and enter the
professional world where you may need or
want to publish in the future
3. Peer review @ DJIM:
Peer review is not copy editing
Professionally
evaluate a colleague's work
using clear guidelines, and contribute
constructive feedback
Reviewers should be familiar with
standard of previous content (read past
issues of DJIM!)
4. Peer review aka “blind review”
The peer review process, for DJIM’s
purposes, is anonymous (“blind review”)
One faculty member and two current
students review each submission
Reviewer should not know whose work they
are reviewing
Author should not know who is reviewing their
work
Everything goes through the editorial board
5. Peer reviewers can always…
Ask editorial board for guidance or
clarification
Express concern that they may have
inadvertently discovered author identity
Request help with completing the peer review
feedback form clearly and completely so the
author will benefit from the process
6. Editorial board support
Editorial
staff have already screened for
adherence to submission guidelines
Eachsubmission should already have the
necessary components
Peer reviewers can focus on central
question: Is this submission suitable for
publication?
7. Peer review is not copy editing
Try to leave typos and grammar alone –
unless they interfere with comprehension
Focus on the big picture: Is the article suitable
for publication or not?
Consult guidelines provided by editorial
board throughout the process, provide
meaningful feedback for author and to let
editorial board why you made the
recommendation to publish (or not)
8. Consider:
Does the title describe the submission’s
scope?
Does the abstract summarize the content?
Is the content clearly organized?
Is the writing understandable to students at
the graduate level of your field?
9. Consider questions such as:
Are arguments made in the submission sound and
reasonable, based on your knowledge of the
field?
Are arguments well supported by the evidence
presented?
If the submission contains statistical evaluation, are
all statistical techniques identified and, when
appropriate, referenced?
Is the conclusion relevant to the arguments of the
submission, and interesting to readers?
10. Red flags
Unsupported statements
Abstract subject, vagueness (reader can’t
grasp the meaning)
Passive voice, weak or repetitive verbs
Lack of clarity
Wordiness, lack of conciseness
Official style (high diction, ponderous
nouns, strings of prepositions)
Inanity, superficiality, superfluousness
www.brandeis.edu/.../uwsexercises/peer-review-exercises.doc
12. Time commitment (step 1)
Set aside adequate time to read the
submission through completely, rather than
piece by piece
If you must leave the submission partway
through and return to it, re-read at least the
introductory section to be sure you remember
what the author’s intentions were
Do the author a favor and really pay
attention, offer constructive feedback
13. Time commitment (step 2)
Come back to the submission a day or a week
later and review all of the text as well as your
comments on the peer review feedback form
Are your comments or questions still clear and
easy to understand?
Do you clearly indicate where in the submission
you are referring to? If you can’t find where you
meant, the author will also have trouble
If you can’t follow your own comments a few days
later, the author won’t understand them either
14. Sample feedback:
DJIM 2012 Peer Review Form
Please attach a Word document assessing the proposed article on the
following criteria by assigning a rank of 1-5, where
1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Very Good, and 5=Outstanding
Relevance to Interdisciplinary Management:
Originality of the Topic:
Significance of the Topic:
Methodology:
Theoretical Grounding:
Adequate Reference to Existing Literature:
Choose One:
Recommended for publication:
as is / with minor changes (please describe below) / with major changes
(please describe below) OR Not recommended for publication
Comments to the Author:
Major contributions/strengths of the article:
Weaknesses of the article:
Suggestions for changes:
15. Giving feedback (1)
Be very specific when pointing out issues
to the author
Simply
noting “unclear” or “?” as a note
about a particular section is unhelpful
Imagine
yourself as the author – do you
have enough guidance to revise your
work?
16. Giving feedback (2)
Ask questions (give page & para # for location)
like:
“Do you mean X? Or do you mean Y?”
“I don’t understand what you mean by X; could
you clarify?”
Make comments such as
“Here it sounds like you’re saying X, when on page
# you wrote [something contradictory]; please
clarify.”
“This idea would be better included on page #
where you talk about [something related].”
“This section is extraneous to your main argument;
consider omitting.”
17. Problems?
Anystumbling blocks or areas of
concern, contact the DJIM editorial
board right away!
Ifyou’re not sure what to do, and wait
until the last minute, the board is delayed
in returning content to the author
Be professional, observe timeline