Week 13 Lecture, 20th Century
Denunciar
Laura SmithSeguir
17 de Apr de 2011•0 recomendaciones•2,217 vistas
Week 13 Lecture, 20th Century
17 de Apr de 2011•0 recomendaciones•2,217 vistas
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Denunciar
Educación
Laura SmithSeguir
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
Art1100 LVA 22 OnlineDan Gunn
Chapter 15 american art before world war iiPetrutaLipan
3.2 greenberg vs rosenbergMelissa Hall
Hum2250 pop! goes the worldProfWillAdams
Chapter 16 abstract expressionism and the new american sculpturePetrutaLipan
Week 4 LectureLaura Smith
Destacado
Elizabeth Murray PPTctanasse46
Frank stellaRodriguez Lehmann
Conceptual artLauren Travis
Academic Vocabulary Worksheetkenklieman
Jayangevil66
Mural ConceptsJacques de Beaufort
Similar a Week 13 Lecture, 20th Century
Lecture, 1970-79Laura Smith
Ap art history test 4 term 3mary294254374
Pp Chap37 Info Agebockoven
Globalization Ayoublachhab4
Body, Gender and IdentityAaron Lawler, PhD
Chapter 13 Race and Gender in Artprofmedina
Último
Personal Brand Exploration Keynote Jamie JohnsonJamieJohnson253007
Referencing and Its Styles And Citation.pptxTeerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad
Being at an RC: Expectations and Nitty-Gritty of Presentation Techniques, A R...Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Theoretical Considerations of Financing Education.pptShrutiMahanta1
Simple Past Tense IBI FDK 23.pptxLBB. Mr. Q
The Parts of The SpeechPP.pdfNetziValdelomar1
![[English version] Fintech Edu Brochures - 20232024 (1080 × 1080 px).pdf](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/englishversionfintechedubrochures-2023202410801080px-230919063045-afa1a2c0-thumbnail.jpg?width=2048&height=1162&fit=bounds)
Week 13 Lecture, 20th Century
- 1. History of 20 th Century Art 1971 - 79
- 2. From Self-Critique to Institutional Critique Frank Stella, More or Less , 1964 Daniel Buren, Peinture-Sculpture , 1971 Guggenheim Museum, NYC
- 3. Haacke, Shapolsky et al Manhattan Real Estate Holdings, a Real-Time Social System, as of May 1, 1971 Institutional Critique (1971)
- 4.
- 5. “ The Supreme Neutrality of Art”? Picasso, Glass and Bottle of Suze 1912 George Grosz, The Pillars of Society 1926 Mark Rothko, Untitled (Violet, Black, Orange Yellow on White and Red) , 1949
- 6. Contemporary Institutional Critique Mark Lombardi from Global Networks (a “narrative structure”) ca. 2000
- 7.
- 8. Ecstasy, Suffering & Transformation in Art History Bernini, Ecstasy of St. Teresa, c.1650 Zurbaran, The Crucifixion , 1627
- 9. Performance/Body Art – “Flesh as Material” Vito Acconci Trademarks 1970
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13. Popular Body/Performance Art David Blaine hanging upside down for 60 hrs NYC, 2008
- 14.
- 15.
- 16. Feminist Art Louise Bourgeois, The Destruction of the Father , 1974
- 17.
- 18.
- 19. Feminist Art – “The Personal is Political” Judy Chicago Dinner Party 1972-79
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23. Postmodernism 101
- 24.
- 25. Postmodernism 101 - Appropriation Levine, Untitled (After Edward Weston I) 1980 Edward Weston, Neil , 1925 Torso of a Youth, Hellenistic or Roman Copy, 2nd-1st century BCE
- 26.
- 27.
Notas del editor
- We’ve discussed at length the modernist desire to critique itself by stripping down the painting or sculpture to its basic forms, shapes, even to the extent that the painting almost no longer exists as a painting (a picture of a thing), but rather as an image-object in the way it reiterates its own form within the work itself (see Frank Stella’s work above). This kind of critical self-examination can also be dealt with in terms of context, but not in terms of site-specificity like in earthworks, rather in terms of the relationship between art and the institutions (museums/galleries) that collect and exhibit it. Some artists became interested in this phenomenon and its various socio-political implications, such as Daniel Buren who used modernist visual form (a black and white striped curtain) to bisect the museum’s interior space, much to the dismay of other exhibiting artists. The installation was subsequently removed.
- Haacke’s work has a number of implications for the art world. It seems to want to collapse distinctions between class, to bring an audience, or that audience’s proxy, into a space where that audience (the poor) haven’t historically been represented, and to use an aesthetic strategy which traditionally hasn’t found favor with museum supporters (photoconceptualism).
- Your book states that Haacke’s work lacks “any accusation or polemical tone”. Is this true? The director didn’t think so. His reasoning for asking for their removal was that he believed they violated the “supreme neutrality of the work of art and therefore no longer merits protection of the museum” (Messer). This brings up a number of questions: What is meant by “neutrality”? Is art neutral? Should it be? Should museums only support work which takes a “neutral” or apolitical stance? What Haacke seems to want to expose is the hidden ideologies and practices behind the aestheticization of art and its seemingly “neutral” function. He has long believed that the wealthy use these spaces to control public perception.
- Lombardi’s self-named “narrative structures” are somewhat indebted to Haacke. However, he culled his info from newspaper articles. Before his death in 2000, his diagrams resulted from his interest in various S&L and energy scandals, the Iran-Contra affair, and even financial connections between George W. Bush and the bin Laden family.