This document compares different prosthetic foot options for developing countries based on criteria like cost, availability, functionality, durability, and cleanliness. It finds that the BYU 2ft prosthetic foot scores highest overall due to its simple, affordable design that provides functionality similar to a normal foot while being durable and easy to clean. The conclusion is that the 2ft prosthetic could allow amputees to have an active life rather than a sedentary one, in line with the goal of bringing hope to amputees.
3. Background Info
• There is a Need!
o Huge demand due to land mines and disease
o Most cannot receive prosthetics
o Prosthetics that are available are not meeting needs
• BYU 2ft Prosthetics
o Designed a prosthetic to address the needs that aren’t being met
o Competitive with current prosthetic market
• Purpose: To Evaluate the 2ft Prosthetic Foot
1. Establish Needs of Amputees
2. Compare Current Market and 2ft Prosthetics
3. Recommend Best Option
4. Before We Begin…
General Needs of a
“Developing Country”
o Large rural population
o Low per capita income
o Health care unable to meet
needs
Transtibial Prosthetic
“Below-the-Knee”
Socket
Component
Foot
5. Needs of Developing
Countries
4. Durability
o Unpaved paths
o Environmental conditions
o Sturdy materials
5. Cleanliness and
Comfort
o Prevent infection/fungus
o Protect limb
o Allow hard work for long
periods of time
1. Cost
o Family annual income $200-300
o Their $40 = Our $20,000
2. Availability
o Product availability
o Clinic/tool availability
3. Functionality and
Aesthetics
o Put back to rural work
o Act as a normal foot
o Prevent “partial human”
treatment
7. Peg Leg Advantages
o Cheap, local materials
o Very simple design
o Easy to replace
Disadvantages
o Poor functionality
o Poor aesthetic
o Not very durable
o Uncomfortable
o Hard to clean plaster
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
Peg Leg 10 10 3 3 2 28
8. PVC/Wooden Foot Advantages
o Cheap, local materials
o Fairly simple design
o Somewhat easy to replace
o Some surface area
Disadvantages
o Wood degrade and break
o Not very durable
o Uncomfortable
o Hard to clean plaster
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
PVC/wood 8 8 5 4 3 28
9. Jaipur Foot Advantages
o Very functional
o Smooth
o Human look
o Durable
o Comfortable
Disadvantages
o Expensive
o Specially trained and
equipped clinics
o Complicated design
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
Jaipur 2 5 10 8 8 33
10. Monolimb with
SACH Foot
Advantages
o Fair functionality
o Looks fairly human
o Quick manufacturing
o Durable plastic
Disadvantages
o Expensive
o Special equipment
o Heat damage
o SACH foot is not very
functional
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
Monolimb 1 4 7 6 6 24
12. 2ft Prosthetic Foot Advantages
o Cheap, local materials
o Simple design, easy to
make
o Functional
o Biomechanics like foot
o Durable
o Clean
Disadvantages
o Moderate cost
o Require some training
o Doesn’t look very human
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
2ft Prosthetic 6 7 8 8 9 38
13. 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Peg Leg PVC/wood Jaipur Monolimb 2ft. Prosthetic
Total Score
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Peg Leg PVC/wood Jaipur Monolimb 2ft. Prosthetic
Score of Each
Criteria
Cost
Availability
Functionality
Durability
Cleanliness
14. Conclusion
2ft Prosthetic design is well-
rounded, simple, and
affordable.
This can be the difference
between a sedentary and
solitary life, and an active
and fulfilling one.
This reflects the heart of the
2ft Prosthetic mantra, which
is “Bringing hope to
amputees, one leg at a
time.”