Workshop Trade-off Analysis - CGIAR_19 Feb 2013_CRP 3.3_Bjoern Ole Sander
Workshop Trade-off Analysis - CGIAR_20 Feb 2013_Keynote Todd Crane
1. Impact as encounter:
Research and agrarian cultures
Todd A. Crane
todd.crane@wur.nl
Knowledge, Technology and Innovation
2. Achieving Impact
Outline
Introduction
Conceptual clarifications
Examples of encounter between research and practice
Concluding remarks
3. Conceptual clarifications
Impact
Culture
Behaviors and technologies (material)
Social organization (institutional)
Knowledge, beliefs and values (ideational)
4. Rural Development Goals
Marka Fulani
Maintain extensive Maintain extensive
agriculture pastoralism
Intensify pastoralism Intensify agriculture
↑ local authority ↑ national authority
(Crane 2010)
5. Co-production of Knowledge?
Micro-politics and soil fertility trials
Cow manure applications
• 2t/year
• 5t/3years
6. Co-production of Knowledge?
Micro-politics and soil fertility trials
Goat and sheep manure?
• Goats and sheep integral part of HH economies
• Farmers’ LK values goat and sheep manure highly
Why only cow manure?
• Presumed ↑ availability of cow manure
• Scientists’ access to standardized supply
• Publishability of rigorous results
• Political objective of program
Led to comparative trials
Validating local knowledge
Illustrating ↑ diversity of options
9. Facilitating Use of ENSO-based DSS
Enable users to evaluate forecasts
Publish forecast history
Publish forecast performance records
Explain probability upfront
Integrate users’ feedback
Content
Form
Medium
http://agroclimate.org/
(Crane et al. 2010)
10. Tradeoffs in climate adaptation
Seasonal forecasts and agric. planning in Indonesia
Is information the main constraint?
(Siregar and Crane 2011)
11. Action Research
Convergence of Sciences – Strengthening
Innovation Systems (http://www.cos-sis.org/)
Benin, Ghana, Mali
Simultaneous on farm-innovation AND institutional
change
• Undirected change
• Avoiding preset indicators
• Not modeled, but practiced
12. Change as self-organization
Farmers’ practice as
Dynamic
Heterogenous
Complex Policy Science
Science
Policy
Development 3.0 ? Practice
Leeuwis, Sherwood and Crane 2012
13. Concluding Remarks on Achieving Impact
Tradeoffs, thus “impacts”, are inherently political
Change is too complex to plan or predict perfectly,
it is emergent from practice and relationships
Impact requires stepping outside of systems perspectives
Achieving impact is a process, not a goal
Avoid pre-defined targets (and indicators)
Research on research
14. References
Crane, T A. 2009. "If farmers are first, do pastoralists come second? Political ecology and participation
.
in central Mali, in Farmer First Revisited: Innovation for Agricultural Research and Development. Edited
"
by I. Scoones and J. Thompson, pp. 88-91. Bourton on Dunsmore, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
—. 2010. Of models and meanings: Cultural resilience in socio-ecological systems. Ecology and Society
15:19.
—. submitted. Participatory technology development as cultural encounter between farmers and
researchers: Bringing science and technology studies into agricultural anthropology. Culture,
Agriculture, Food and Environment.
Crane, T A., C. Roncoli, and G. Hoogenboom. 2011. Adaptation to climate change and climate
.
variability: The importance of understanding agriculture as performance. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of
Life Sciences 57:179-185.
Crane, T A., C. Roncoli, J. Paz, N. E. Breuer, K. Broad, K. T Ingram, and G. Hoogenboom. 2010. Forecast
. .
skill and farmers' skills: Seasonal climate forecasts and risk management among Georgia (U.S.) farmers.
Weather, Climate and Society 2:44-59.
Röling, N., D. Hounkonnou, D. Kossou, T W. Kuyper, S. Nederlof, O. Sakyi-Dawson, M. Traoré, and A.
.
van Huis. 2012. Diagnosing the scope for innovation: Linking smallholder practices and institutional
context: Introduction to the special issue. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 60–63:1-6.
Sherwood, S., C. Leeuwis, and T A. Crane. 2012. Development 3.0: Development practice in transition.
.
Farming Matters 12:40-41.
Siregar, P R., and T A. Crane. 2011. Climate Information and Agricultural Practice in Adaptation to
. .
Climate Variability: The Case of Climate Field Schools in Indramayu, Indonesia. Culture, Agriculture,
Food and Environment 33:55-69.
17. Quantum physics ?
Is light a particle or a
wave?
Yes, depending on
what tools you use to
analyse it.
Systems is just one
analytical approach
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v437/n7059/full/nature04040.html
18. Farmer Back to Farmer
Rhoades RE, Booth RH (1982) Farmer-back-to-farmer: A model for
generating acceptable agricultural technology. Agricultural Administration
11:127-137.
Notas del editor
04/03/13
Researcher: What is the cause of soil fertility decline in central Mali? Marka agropastoralist: There are not enough cattle, and so not enough manure for the fields. Researcher: What is the cause of soil fertility decline in central Mali? Fulani agropastoralist: There are too many fields for the number of cattle. 04/03/13
04/03/13 MARKA: 39% of Marka cited establishment of rules between farmers and herders. 29% citing the importance of village chiefs in process. Collective action and organization. “ Authorities profit from herders money, … authorities should stay out of issues with the cattle, and leave it between the villages and the herders”. FULANI: Emphasis on individual responsibility “ To avoid conflicts, the farmers have to pay attention to their fields, the herders their herds. Like that, if everyone guards their property, they would never beat each other”. “ It is necessary that the administrative authorities must be involved in order to open the trails that are planted over by fields”. Both Marka and Fulani responses confirm Painter et al’s description of the approche terroir. It is favoring the sedentary farmers and disadvantaging extensive pastoralists. Marka call for increased decentralization of NRM power. Fulani call for an establishment of boundaries between farming and herding spaces. This desire to enclose an open access resource can be seen as a defensive action against the threat of losing it altogether.
04/03/13 Scientists: Presumed availability of cow manure; Scientists’ access to standardized supply; Publishability of rigorous results Farmers: differential quality of manures; different pathways of access, technical considerations of application Soil fertility trials Differential applications of cow manure Presumed availability of cow manure Scientists’ access to standardized supply Publishability of rigorous results Goat and sheep manure? Goats and sheep integral part of HH economies Farmers’ LK values goat and sheep manure highly Led to simultaneous comparative trials Testing LK Illustrating ↑ diversity of options
04/03/13 Use of goat and sheep manure turned out as having best results in biophysical modeling
How do farmers manage their own resources (tradeoffs in terms of materials, money, time, etc.)? How does research relate 04/03/13