Presentation to Centre for Studies of Childhood and Youth5th International Conference. "Researching children's everyday lives: socio-cultural contexts "
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Lm Brady cscy conference 1.7.14
1. Embedding children & young people’s
participation in health services and
research
Louca-Mai
Brady
*Picture courtesy Investing in Children
2. Embedding children and young
people’s participation in health
services and research
• How is CYP’s participation defined and
operationalised?
• What does it mean to ‘embed’ CYP’s
participation within health services and research?
• What needs to be in place for participation to be
meaningful, effective and sustainable - at different levels,
for different groups and in different settings?
• What are the barriers and challenges to meaningful,
effective and sustainable participation and how can
these be addressed?
3. Approach
• Literature review
• Critical inquiry
- workshops and presentations
- blog
- Twitter and other social media
• Action research in two case studies
4. Background
• Constructions of childhood: developmental
approaches vs sociology of childhood
• Children and young people’s participation,
rights and the UNCRC
• Growth of citizenship
and public engagement
as issues in policy
and practice
5. Navigating the landscape
• Legislation: Health & Social Care & Children and
Families Acts
• CYP’s participation in new NHS structures and
processes, incl NHS Constitution
• Children’s Health Outcomes Forum
• Tools and quality criteria: Hear by Right, You’re
Welcome
• Continued NIHR commitment to public
involvement & increasing interest in public
involvement with CYP
6. ““This expectation for patient and
public participation has no age limit.
Children and young people…should
be encouraged and facilitated to
participate in decisions about their
own care and, more broadly, about
the health and social care services
and policies that affect them”.
Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer
2012 - Our Children Deserve Better:
Prevention Pays (DH, 2013).
7. Participation
A process by which individuals influence
decisions which bring about change in
themselves, their peers, the services they
use and their communities
Participation
Works (2010)
8. • Article 12 . Every child and young person has the
right to express his or her views freely in all matters
affecting them
• Article 24. Children have the right to good quality
health care and information to help them stay
healthy
UN Convention on the Rights
of the Child (UNCRC)
9. General comment
Article 12 highlights the importance of children’s participation...This
includes their views on all aspects of health provisions, including,
for example, what services are needed, how and where they are
best provided, barriers to accessing or using services, the quality
of the services and the attitudes of health professionals, how to
strengthen children’s capacities to take increasing levels of
responsibility for their own health and development, and how to
involve them more effectively in the provision of services, as peer
educators. States are encouraged to conduct regular participatory
consultations, which are adapted to the age and maturity of the child,
and research with children, and to do this separately with their
parents, in order to learn about their health challenges, developmental
needs and expectations as a contribution to the design of effective
interventions and health programmes” (UN, 2013).
10. Case studies:
• NHS Trust working with a voluntary sector
organisation to support CYP’s participation
in the development and delivery of a
Community Children’s Health Partnership
• Young people’s involvement in an
adaptation and feasibility study of an
intervention for young people who misuse
alcohol and drugs
11. Community Children’s Health
Partnership
• Working collaboratively with groups of
staff, young people who have been
involved in participation activity and other
stakeholders, through a series of
workshops and other activities
• First cycle: developing a strategy
• Second cycle: putting strategy into
practice
12. Whole systems approach to
participation*
• Culture: demonstrating a commitment to participation
• Structure: planning, development and resourcing of
participation; including identifying key staff, roles and
resources required for implementation
• Practice: ways of working, methods of involvement, skills
and knowledge required
• Review: recording, monitoring and evaluation systems
which will enable organisation to evidence change
affected by participation
*Social Care Institute of Excellence (2006) Practice Guide 11
16. Plan A…
• Recruit an advisory group of 10-12 young
people who had previously used drug and
alcohol services and would be actively
engaged throughout the project.
• Members of this group, along with parent
representatives, would then be supported
to attend trial steering committee
meetings.
17. Plan B
• Shift from a traditional Advisory Group
model to something more localised & led by YP.
• On-going recruitment.
• More workshops or consultations with YP in services
they use and/or near where they live.
• If YP are then interested in on-going involvement in the
project will be given opportunity to be involved in smaller
and more flexible young advisors group.
• Options for input via email, text, Skype & social media
(eg Facebook) as well as face-to-face.
• Report to trial steering committee with input
from/attendance by YP if interested.
18. 2013 workshop: ‘Embedded’
participation is…
• Integrated and integral
• Meaningful
• Well-supported
• Inclusive and flexible
• Realistic
• Collaborative and sharing learning
• Demonstrates impact
19. Key questions
• CYP as ‘objects of concern’ or ‘person’s with
a voice’? Patients and/or citizens?
• Power: adult/child, professional/service user,
well/unwell, researcher/researched
• Which rights? participation, protection or
provision? Individual and collective rights
• Participation – but within adult power
structures, with adult-led agendas and with
adult agreement & support?
• Participation/involvement/engagement/voice?
Notas del editor
Despite increasing profile of CYP’s participation, there’s a lack of evidence about how to ensure it is meaningful, effective and sustained
Childhood’ has many and varied definitions including ‘the status of being a minor, the early-life state of immaturity whether actual or ascribed and the process of growing towards adulthood
Theoretical approaches to childhood in the minority world have been dominated by developmental psychology, and the idea ‘that what children mainly do during childhood is develop towards adulthood’ + idea that children are above all to be protected and provided for in order that they may develop well and be prepared to enter into the public domain upon reaching adulthood
CYP have tended to be thought of by policymakers as ‘objects of concern’ rather than ‘persons with a voice’
Childhood studies, and in particular the sociology of childhood, has challenged these ideas of children being apolitical adults-in-waiting, and instead developed paradigms of children as social actors and childhood as a social space in which children can and do have agency
Children and Families Act 2014 mentions children’s rights and the CRC, and public involvement is also a key element of the Health and Social Care Act 2012
Increasing awareness of the importance of developing CYP’s participation in health services in a strategic and systematic way. Patients working in partnership with clinicians and carers in decisions about their healthcare is one of the guiding principles of the 2013 NHS Constitution
In their response to the Children’s Health Outcomes Forum (DH, 2012) report the government acknowledged the importance of children’s rights and the CRC being at the heart of health and social care
Recent developments at a national level incl NHS England Youth Forum , new children’s experience measures within NHS, The Care Quality Commission involving CYP in their inspection activities, and the involvement of CYP on the board of Healthwatch England and within local Healthwatch bodies
Local level: services there is also increasing use of rights-based tools and quality criteria such as ‘Hear by Right’, ‘You’re Welcome’ & Young People-Friendly
But – not yet much evidence on how the rhetoric becomes reality
The most recent Chief Medical Officer’s Report talks about the expectation inherent in the Constitution ‘that patients, service users and the public participate nationally and locally in the development, implementation and accountability processes of health and social care policy and services’ (DH, 2013c). The report goes on to emphasise the importance of the CRC to these participation processes and say that:
“This expectation for patient and public participation has no age limit. Children and young people…should be encouraged and facilitated to participate in decisions about their own care and, more broadly, about the health and social care services and policies that affect them”.
Ref: models and debates but won’t discuss these here
Ratified by UK govt in 1991
A key implication of the CRC is all children have needs that must be met in order to optimise their health and wellbeing, and the CRC establishes international recognition that all CYP have a right to the highest possible standards of both healthcare and participation (Alderson, 2014). In a recent General Comment on Article 24 the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child emphasised ‘the importance of approaching children’s health from a child-rights perspective’
Discuss how deconstructed this in CCHP workshops to consider how to take a rights-based approach to participation
SCIE whole-systems approach to participation has four elements that we considered during:
Culture – Ethos of an organisation shared by all staff and services users which demonstrates a commitment to participation including an ongoing process of capacity building and information available to children, young people, parents and carers to help them participate.
Structure – The planning, development and resourcing of participation evident in organisation’s infrastructure, with key staff, roles and resources identified for its implementation.
Practice – The way of working, methods of involvement, skills and knowledge which enable children and young people to become involved.
Review - The recording, monitoring and evaluation systems which enable an organisation to evidence change affected by participation. This should be shared within the organisation, with partners and the commissioners.
http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide11/
We will retain a core Young Advisors group who will meet at regular intervals throughout the project, but this group is likely to be smaller and more flexible than anticipated with YP moving in and out of the group if necessary, and when more or less interested in different aspects of the project (see appendix I). So young people’s involvement will no longer centred around 2-3 monthly meetings but start with smaller consultations based at services or other locations convenient for young people, as well as email, phone or Skype conversations when this is more convenient or timely. We will try and arrange at least two face-to-face meetings for young advisors in the next year and keep in regular contact with young people in between. These consultations may be co-facilitated by YA members if they are available and interested (some are peer mentors or have been involved in training). If interested young people will then be given the option for on-going involvement and invited to become a young advisor, but there will be no obligation. This will give young people, and services, a chance to find out more about the study and potential involvement without making an on-going commitment at the outset.