SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 26
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Open-File Report 2016-3
Columbus 2016
Mapping Source Rock and Thermal
Maturity of the Devonian Shale Interval
in Eastern Ohio
by
Ronald A. Riley
DISCLAIMER
The information contained herein has not been reviewed for technical accuracy and conformity with the
current Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), Division of Geological Survey standards for published
or open-file materials. The ODNR Division of Geological Survey does not guarantee this information to be free
from errors, omissions, or inaccuracies and disclaims any responsibility or liability for interpretations or deci-
sions based thereon.
Cover image: Ohio Shale exposure at Copperas Mountain in Ross County, Ohio.
Recommended bibliographic citation: Riley, R.A., 2016, Mapping source rock and thermal maturity of the De-
vonian shale interval in eastern Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological
Survey Open-File Report 2016-3, 22 p.
i
CONTENTS
Abstract	...................................................................................................................................................1
Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1
Source rock geochemistry terms and definitions......................................................................................2
Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters and definitions..................................................................................2
Thermal maturity measurements and definitions................................................................................2
Previous work...........................................................................................................................................3
Methodology.............................................................................................................................................4
Regional stratigraphic and structural setting................................................................................................5
Discussion................................................................................................................................................6
Source rock geochemistry.......................................................................................................................6
Source rock potential maps...............................................................................................................6
Thermal maturity maps.................................................................................................................. 11
Conclusions............................................................................................................................................ 11
Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................................15
References cited......................................................................................................................................15
Appendix................................................................................................................................................18
FIGURES
1. Sampled wells used for source rock mapping of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.....................4
2. Typical well log from Licking County, Ohio, showing stratigraphic nomenclature for the
Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.................................................................................................5
3. Map of interval thickness of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio..................................................7
4. Structure map on top of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio........................................................8
5. Isopleth map of the maximum total organic carbon (TOC) for the Devonian shale interval in
eastern Ohio.........................................................................................................................................9
6. Isopleth map of the maximum S1
(existing hydrocarbons) for the Devonian shale interval in
eastern Ohio....................................................................................................................................... 10
7. Isopleth map of the maximum S2
(hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis) for the
Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio...............................................................................................12
8. Isograd map of the maximum vitrinite reflectance (%Ro
) for the Devonian shale interval in
eastern Ohio.......................................................................................................................................13
9. Isograd map of the conodont alteration index (CAI) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio........14
TABLES
1. Measured geochemical parameters describing source rock generative potential
from TOC, S1
, S2
, and S1
+ S2
................................................................................................................2
2. Thermal maturity parameters describing types of hydrocarbon generated
from Tmax
, PI, %Ro
, and CAI...................................................................................................................3
A-1. List of wells and data used for mapping source rock potential and thermal maturity
in eastern Ohio...................................................................................................................................18
PLATE
1. Regional stratigraphic cross section illustrating the Middle and Upper Devonian interval from Delaware
County, Ohio, to Pleasants County, West Virginia.................................................................................22
ii
ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT
Units of Measure
Foot/feet.................................................. ft
Gram(s)....................................................g
Kilometer(s)...........................................km
Meter(s).................................................. m
Mile(s)....................................................mi
Milligram(s)...........................................mg
Other
Eastern Gas Shales Project................... EGSP
Gas Research Institute............................GRI
Hydrocarbons.........................................HC
Total organic carbon ............................TOC
U.S. Department of Energy....................DOE
U.S. Geological Survey........................ USGS
1
ABSTRACT
The stratigraphic interval for this investigation extends from the top of the Middle Devonian Onondaga Lime-
stone to the base of the Upper Devonian Berea Sandstone. Devonian shale source rock geochemistry and ther-
mal maturity data were compiled from all available published sources and from archived data for 201 wells
in eastern and central Ohio. From this comprehensive database, maps of total organic carbon (TOC), existing
hydrocarbons (S1
), hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis (S2
), vitrinite reflectance (%Ro
), and conodont al-
teration index (CAI) were constructed to better refine the source rock generative potential and thermal maturity
of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Generally, westward increases in TOC, S1
, and S2
were evident
from these preliminary maps. Maximum TOC values per well ranged from 0.5 to 18.4 percent with over 70 per-
cent of the wells having values greater than 4 percent, which is considered excellent source rock potential. The
maximum value of TOC for the Devonian shale was over twice that of the Upper Ordovician Utica-Point Pleas-
ant interval in eastern Ohio. The maximum S1
value was 8.6 milligrams of hydrocarbons per gram (mg HC/g) of
rock (excellent source rock generative potential) and generally ranged from 1 to 2 mg HC/g of rock (good source
rock generative potential). Maximum S2
values were often in the range of 10–20 (very good) or 20–40 (excel-
lent) mg HC/g rock. Thermal maturity maps using %Ro
and CAI revealed a basinward (eastward) transition to
more thermally mature rocks. Maximum vitrinite reflectance values ranged from 0.33 to 1.34 %Ro
. A 0.6 %Ro
isograd trends northeast–southwest through eastern Ohio, marks the onset of oil generation, and separates the
immature region to the west. The oil window transitions eastward to a condensate or wet gas window at values
between 1.1 and 1.4 %Ro
. “Vitrinite suppression” was indicated by both a comparison with %Ro
of the overly-
ing coals and with reported historic production. While current Devonian shale horizontal drilling is focused on
the Marcellus Shale, these maps and data present strong evidence that other organic-rich Devonian shale units,
such as the overlying Huron Shale Member and Rhinestreet Shale Member, also have significant oil and gas
potential and may be good candidates for modern-day horizontal drilling techniques.
Mapping Source Rock and Thermal Maturity of
the Devonian Shale Interval in Eastern Ohio
by Ronald A. Riley
INTRODUCTION
The application of horizontal drilling combined with
multistage hydraulic fracturing has resulted in a boom
in drilling for unconventional gas and oil through-
out the United States during the past decade. Since
2006, this technology has stimulated drilling activity
and production from the Devonian Marcellus Shale
in eastern Ohio and the Appalachian Basin and more
recently, for other Devonian shale intervals such as
the Rhinestreet Shale Member. The high potential for
oil-and-gas production in these black, organic-rich
shales has created an aggressive leasing-and-permit-
ting program by many large independent and major oil
companies in Ohio and the Appalachian Basin since
the latter part of 2010.
With this renewed interest in shale exploration, ad-
ditional Devonian black shale well cuttings and core
archived at the Ohio Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Geological Survey (Ohio Geological Sur-
vey) core repository have been sampled and analyzed
by oil-and-gas operators since 2011. Recent public
domain data is extremely important to define target
areas for Devonian shale exploration and to assist in
updating and refining the resource assessment of the
Devonian black shale interval. The data compilation
and mapping project described herein are a result of
the Ohio Geological Survey efforts to provide one com-
prehensive database on Devonian shale source rock
geochemistry and thermal maturity data to be used
for evaluating and mapping the geographic limits of
this important and prolific oil-and-gas play in eastern
Ohio.
Various studies on Devonian shale thermal maturity
have been published by the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS)from selected sample sets in Ohio and across
the Appalachian Basin region. These investigations
did not include archived data published in previous
U.S. Department of Energy/Eastern Gas Shales Project
(DOE/EGSP) and Gas Research Institute (GRI) studies
during the 1970s and 1980s. In addition, source rock
geochemistry and thermal maturity analyses on nu-
merous Devonian shale cores and cuttings in storage
2
at the Ohio Geological Survey core repository recently
have become public domain data. When combined
with published geochemical data from previous DOE/
EGSP, GRI, and USGS studies, this recently acquired
data has created a larger, more extensive data set to
map and evaluate this regionally extensive Devonian
shale unconventional target.
Source Rock Geochemistry Terms and Definitions
The following definitions and descriptions are pro-
vided to aid in better understanding of basic source
rock potential properties as they are discussed in this
report.
Total organic carbon (TOC) is a measurement in
weight percent of the quantity of organic carbon
preserved in a rock sample and includes both
kerogen and bitumen (Peters and Cassa, 1994).
Organic content is largely controlled during sedi-
mentation by biologic productivity, sediment min-
eralogy, and oxygenation of the water column and
sediment. The TOC is a useful qualitative mea-
sure of petroleum potential. A TOC of 0.5 percent
generally is regarded as the minimum for defining
a petroleum source rock, but most geochemists
consider a TOC of greater than 1.0 percent as a
good source rock for generating petroleum poten-
tial (table 1).
Kerogen is the portion of organic carbon particulate
matter that is insoluble and remains after extrac-
tion of organic solvents. It is derived from the
breakdown of both marine and land-derived plant
and animal matter.
Bitumen is the portion of organic matter that is
soluble in organic solvents. It is generally derived
from the cracking (thermal disassociation) of the
kerogen and to a lesser extent from lipid com-
pounds from once-living organisms. In a broader,
informal sense it refers to tar, pitch, and asphalt.
Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters and definitions
S1
values are a measurement (mg HC/g of rock) of
the free hydrocarbons already generated that are
volatilized out of the rock without cracking the
kerogen. The hydrocarbons are distilled out of the
rock sample at initial heating to a temperature of
350°C. These values may be anomalously high
from migration and contamination by drilling flu-
ids and mud. An S1
of greater than 1 is considered
to be a good source rock (table 1).
S2
is a measurement (mg HC/g of rock) of the
amount of hydrocarbons generated through
thermal cracking of kerogen and heavy hydrocar-
bons. It represents the existing potential of a rock
to generate hydrocarbons and is a more realistic
measure of source rock potential than TOC, which
includes “dead carbon” incapable of generating
hydrocarbons. The S2
generally decreases with
burial depths greater than 1 km. A S2
of greater
than 5 is considered to have good source rock
generative potential (table 1).
Thermal maturity measurements and definitions
Vitrinite reflectance (%Ro
) and conodont alteration
index (CAI) are two of the primary indicators used
to assess the thermal maturity of source rocks, and
both were mapped for this project. Other evaluation
methods for assessing thermal maturity include the
hydrogen index (HI) and the production index (PI);
both are derived from Rock-Eval pyrolysis measure-
ments (Wallace and Roen, 1989; Peters and Cassa,
1994; McCarthy and others, 2011). The temperature
(°C) of maximum release of hydrocarbons (Tmax
) is an-
other Rock-Eval measurement used for determination
of thermal maturity and is sometimes used in deeper,
pre-Carboniferous geologic units where vitrinite is
absent (Wallace and Roen, 1989; Peters and Cassa,
1994). Ryder and others (2013) provide a detailed dis-
cussion of multiple parameters used for determining
thermal maturity of Devonian shales in the northern
Appalachian Basin, including %Ro
, gas chromatogra-
phy (GC) spectra of bitumen extracts, organic matter
type, spectral fluorescence of Tasminites algae, and HI
values.
Vitrinite reflectance (%Ro
) is a key diagnostic tool
for assessing thermal maturity and is based on
measuring the reflectivity (R) of vitrinite through
TABLE 1. Measured geochemical parameters describing source rock generative potential from TOC, S1
, S2
, and S1
+ S2
†
Quality
TOC
wt. %
S1
mg HC/g rock
S2
mg HC/g rock
S1
+ S2
mg HC/g rock
Poor <0.5 0–0.5 0–2.5 0–3.0
Fair 0.5–1.0 0.5–1.0 2.5–5.0 3.0–6.0
Good 1.0–2.0 1.0–2.0 5.0–10.0 6.0–12.0
Very good 2.0–4.0 2.0–4.0 10.0–20.0 12.0–24.0
Excellent >4.0 >4.0 >20.0 >24.0
†
Modified from Peters (1986) and Wallace and Roen (1989).
3
a microscope equipped with an oil-immersion ob-
jective lens and photometer. Vitrinite is a maceral
(plant and animal remains) found in many kero-
gens and is formed from the thermal alteration of
lignin and cellulose in plant walls. As temperature
increases, vitrinite undergoes complex, irrevers-
ible aromatization reactions that increase the
reflectance. Reflectance measurements represent
the percent of light reflected in oil, designated as
%Ro
. The oil window generally falls within a %Ro
ranging from 0.6 to 1.4 (table 2). Values less than
0.6 %Ro
are considered immature and those over
1.4 %Ro
are considered overmature.
Conodont alteration index (CAI) is based on color
changes seen in microscopic-sized fossil teeth
from the remains of eel-shaped chordates. These
fossils are highly resistant to weathering and
metamorphic temperature regimes and contain
trace amounts of organic matter. Their color
alteration is time and temperature dependent and
is a progressive, irreversible condition, making
them ideal for correlating to maximum tempera-
tures. The CAI can be determined by comparing
samples against a set of conodont color standards
(table 2). Using CAI thermal maturation indices,
the oil and gas windows are in a gradational
boundary. The onset of oil generation is placed
between 1.0 and 1.5, and the limit of oil genera-
tion is between 2.0 and 2.5 (Harris, 1979).
PREVIOUS WORK
Previous work on the source rock properties and
thermal maturity of the Devonian shale interval in
Ohio and the Appalachian Basin have been published
in studies funded by the DOE/EGSP and the GRI and
also from reports published by the USGS. These re-
ports and associated data provide a wealth of histori-
cal data from which to reexamine the Devonian shale
resources in Ohio and surrounding Appalachian Basin
states.
Reports published by EGSP contained data sets for
12 Devonian shale cores from eastern Ohio analyzed
by Geochem Research, Inc. (U.S. DOE, 2007). These
geochemical data reports included total organic carbon
(TOC) and vitrinite reflectance (%Ro
) measurements,
as well as density measurements, visual kerogen as-
sessments, saturated hydrocarbon analyses, biostrati-
graphic identification, and mineralogical analyses
throughout the entire Devonian shale interval.
Investigations funded by GRI included source rock
geochemistry data from 98 Devonian shale sidewall
core plugs from 4 wells in southeastern Ohio (Owen
and others, 1985). This joint study by Terra Tek, Inc.,
Stocker and Sitler, and ResTech, Inc., contained TOC,
Rock-Eval pyrolysis, and measured vitrinite reflectance
data. ExLog/Brown and Ruth (1988) also published
Devonian shale geochemical data based on cores and
well cuttings from 18 wells in eastern Ohio. In another
GRI-sponsored project, 98 full-diameter Devonian
shale cores were taken along the outcrop trend in the
early 1980s. This cooperative project between the
Institute of Gas Technology (IGT), HYCRUDE Corpora-
tion, Phillips Petroleum Company, and Bechtel Group
sought to determine the feasibility of hydroretorting
organic-rich shale for oil recovery (Weil and others,
1978). Although never commercially performed in
Ohio, the Hytort process, developed by HYCRUDE
Corporation, used hydrogen-rich gas during retorting
to enhance oil yields from oil shales. Archived data for
these 98 cores included TOC measurements, wireline
logs, core descriptions, and calculated oil yield in gal-
lons per ton. These cores and data permanently reside
at the offices of the Ohio Geological Survey.
U.S. Geological Survey Devonian shale investigations
included Milici and Swezey (2006), Rowan (2006),
Repetski and others (2008), East and others (2012),
Ryder and others (2013), Hackley and others (2013),
and Repetski and others (2014). Rowan (2006) ex-
amined the burial and thermal history of the central
Appalachian Basin using 2-D models for the Cambrian
through Permian interval. In a resource assessment of
the Devonian shale in the Appalachian Basin, Milici
and Swezey (2006) used vitrinite reflectance (%Ro
)
to assist in their evaluation. Milici and Swezey (2006)
noted that %Ro
values appeared to be underesti-
mated based on a comparison to the %Ro
values of
the overlying Pennsylvanian coal beds; this phenom-
enon was described as “vitrinite reflectance suppres-
sion.” Repetski and others (2008) mapped thermal
TABLE 2. Thermal maturity parameters describing types of hydrocarbon generated from Tmax, PI
, %Ro
, and CAI†
Type
Tmax
(°C)
PI
[S1
/(S1
+S2
)]
%Ro
CAI
Immature <435 <0.1 0.2–0.6 0–1.0
Top oil window 435–445 0.1 0.6 1.0–1.5
Bottom oil window 470 0.4 1.4 1.5–2.0
Postmature >470 >0.4 >1.4 >2.0
†
Modified from Peters and Cassa (1984).
4
maturity patterns for Ordovician and Devonian rocks
in the Appalachian Basin using both CAI and %Ro
.
East and others (2012) constructed a regional thermal
maturity map of the Devonian shale based on %Ro
that included the Illinois, Michigan, and Appalachian
Basins. Thermal maturity of the Devonian shale in the
northern Appalachian Basin was examined by Hackley
and others (2013) using multiple techniques. Vitrinite
reflectance, Rock-Eval pyrolysis, gas chromatography,
and GC-mass spectrometry were evaluated on three
transects. Results from vitrinite reflectance indicated
that most samples in eastern Ohio were immature,
and higher vitrinite reflectance values were present
in the overlying Pennsylvanian coals; these findings
supported previous studies that vitrinite reflectance
values in the Devonian shale appeared to be sup-
pressed. A major revision of thermal maturity patterns
was made by Repetski and others (2014) for Devonian
and Ordovician rocks in the Appalachian Basin using
CAI and vitrinite reflectance data. In their study, the
distribution of Devonian CAI and %Ro
were related to
structural features and oil-and-gas fields.
METHODOLOGY
For this project, Devonian shale source rock geo-
chemistry and thermal maturity data were compiled
from published sources and from all archived data
on file at the Ohio Geological Survey. Archived data
included older source rock data from Devonian shale
research dating back to the 1970s and 1980s along
with recently submitted data (since 2011) for uncon-
ventional shale exploration using horizontal drilling
and massive hydraulic fracturing. Published sources
included reports and data from the USGS, the EGSP
studies, and GRI investigations. The USGS has sam-
pled numerous cores and cuttings from the Devonian
shale interval over the past decade.
Published references on source rock geochemistry
for the Devonian shale interval were compiled and
all pertinent source rock data from these publications
were entered into a digital database that was incorpo-
rated into the geochemistry source rock and thermal
maturity mapping. All historic and recent source rock
geochemistry data submitted to the Ohio Geologi-
cal Survey was entered into a
digital database. The data was
edited for accuracy and com-
pleteness. The Ohio Geological
Survey source rock geochemis-
try database represents all pub-
lic domain data and includes
older data from the 1970s and
1980s, as well as recent data
obtained from operators. Source
rock data compiled and used
for this investigation are listed
in the Appendix, and the well
locations are shown in Figure 1.
For this investigation, source
rock geochemistry data was
available for 201 unique wells
in the study area of eastern
Ohio (fig. 1). For some wells,
geochemical analyses were
performed on the same well by
multiple operators. Of the 201
unique wells, 175 wells had
TOC data, 118 wells had S1
and
S2
data, and 55 wells had %Ro
data. Published CAI data was
available for only 17 wells in
the mapped area, with 13 in
Ohio and 4 in West Virginia for
additional control. Samples for
additional CAI analyses for the
Devonian Onondaga Limestone
interval were collected from 13
IN
WV
KY
PA
MI
ERIE
LAKE
Ross
Stark
Pike
Wood
Darke
Knox
Licking
Scioto
Adams
Gallia
Wayne
Huron
Perry
Clark
Allen
Butler
Lorain
Seneca
Logan
Brown
Athens
Union
Trumbull
Meigs
Ashtabula
Hardin
Henry
Franklin
Preble
Noble
Mercer
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Miami
Belmont
Hancock
Vinton
Fairfield
Putnam
Highland
Lucas
Carroll
Shelby
Richland
Monroe
Clinton
Greene
Muskingum
Fayette
Marion
Warren
Medina
Holmes
Pickaway
Guernsey
Morgan
Madison
Washington
Coshocton
Geauga
Jackson
Hocking
Summit
Ashland
Morrow
Lake
Clermont
Tuscarawas
Delaware
Williams
Harrison
Paulding
Defiance
Lawrence
Auglaize
Van Wert
Cuyahoga
Wyandot
Hamilton
Columbiana
Jefferson
Crawford
Sandusky
Mahoning
Champaign
Ottawa
Montgomery
Core (101)
Cuttings (100)
Ohio Shale outcrop
0 50 Miles
0 50 Kilometers
FIGURE 1. Sampled wells used for source rock mapping of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
5
additional wells in eastern Ohio to provide a better
geographic distribution of data. These samples were
sent to the USGS to determine the CAI, but results
were unavailable by the publication of this report.
The source rock data was reviewed for accuracy.
Data reported as suspect by the laboratory analyses
company were removed to improve the accuracy of
the interpretation and mapping. For %Ro
measure-
ments, only those samples identified as indigenous
were used for mapping. Other measured values from
cuttings that were not indigenous were considered
suspect and may have been from caving material from
higher stratigraphic intervals. Queries were performed
to calculate the average and maximum values of the
Devonian shale interval for the following attributes:
TOC, S1
, S2
, %Ro
, and CAI.
Preliminary maps of TOC, S1
, S2
, %Ro
, and CAI per
well were constructed using IHS Petra® software. The
final maps for this report were generated using ESRI
ArcGIS® software for all mapped attributes. Each con-
tour shape file was manually edited to honor all data
points. Anomalous data values were examined from
the original data sources, and the database was edited
where data was suspect. For consistency, the maxi-
mum values of source rock attributes were mapped for
this project. It should be noted that data was sampled
from both core and well cuttings, which may skew
the data. Sampling from core is generally more selec-
tive since the more organic-rich zones are targeted
for analyses. Sampling from well cuttings are blended
or mixed over a 10 to 20-ft (3–7-m) interval. Thus
measured values for well cuttings may be suppressed
when compared with those sampled from cores.
REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHIC AND
STRUCTURAL SETTING
The Devonian shale sequence of eastern Ohio is an
eastward-thickening wedge of sediments on the west-
ern flank of the Appalachian Basin. This eastward-
thickening stratigraphic interval is well documented
and illustrated in eastern Ohio and across the Appa-
lachian Basin through numerous cross sections and
schematic diagrams by various authors (Rich, 1951;
Gray and others, 1982; Potter and others, 1982; Ohio
Division of Geological Survey, 1988; Roen and Kep-
ferle, 1993; Boswell, 1996; and Baranoski and Riley,
2013). These studies provided a subsurface strati-
graphic framework that was tied into the Devonian
shale outcrops in western New York and central and
northeastern Ohio.
The Devonian shale stratigraphic interval for this
investigation extends from the top of the Middle
Devonian Onondaga Limestone to the base of the
Upper Devonian Berea Sandstone (fig. 2 and plate 1).
Stratigraphic nomenclature used for this investigation
(fig. 2) is based on the nomenclature established for
the EGSP (Gray and others, 1982) and also used in the
GRI-Devonian shale study (Ohio Division of Geological
Survey, 1988).
The basinwide Devonian shale sequence consists
of two dominant facies: black, organic-rich shale and
gray to greenish-gray, silty shale. The organic-rich
shale units can be correlated regionally across the
basin with wireline logs based on the higher gamma
ray signature and typically higher porosity response
on the density curve. The more organic-rich facies
of the Marcellus Shale, Rhinestreet Shale Member of
the Olentangy Shale, and Huron Shale Member of the
Ohio Shale have been the primary targets for hydro-
carbon production and exploration in this interval. In
these unconventional reservoirs, the organic-rich shale
serves as the source rock, reservoir, and seal. The Mar-
cellus Shale has been extensively drilled with hori-
zontal wells in western Pennsylvania, western West
Virginia, and extreme eastern Ohio where thickness is
greater than 50 ft (15 m). In Ohio, the Marcellus Shale
reaches a maximum thickness of approximately 75 ft
(23 m) in eastern Monroe and Washington Counties
(Erenpreiss and others, 2011). The Marcellus Shale and
Rhinestreet Shale thin westward and disappear in east-
ern Ohio, while the Huron Shale can be traced as far
3408922581
Hunting Oil Co.
Doyle Wolford
TD=2990 ft
911 m
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD RHOB
2.000 3.000G/C3
TVD
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
Cleveland Sh Mbr
Sunbury Sh
Bedford Sh
Berea Ss
Chagrin Sh Mbr
upper Huron Sh Mbr
middle Huron Sh Mbr
lower Huron Sh Mbr
Java Fm
Angola Sh Mbr
Pipe Creek
Sh Mbr
Rhinestreet Sh Mbr
Onondaga Ls
Hamilton Gp
Marcellus Sh
Ohio Sh
“Upper”
Olentangy Sh
“Lower”
Olentangy Sh
Depth ft. Porosity
GR
600
ROHB
MIDDLE
DEVONIAN
UPPER
DEVONIAN
MISSIS–
SIPPIAN
Unit abbreviations: Fm = Formation, Gp = Group, Ls = Limestone, Mbr = Member, Sh = Shale, Ss = Sandstone.
Geologic Unit System/
Period
FIGURE 2. Typical well log from Licking County, Ohio, showing stratigraphic
nomenclature for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
6
west as the outcrop belt in central Ohio (plate 1). The
Devonian shale outcrops at the surface in central Ohio
trending north–south and then curves eastward along
Lake Erie in northern Ohio. In the Appalachian Basin
portion of Ohio, the Devonian shale interval is absent
west of the outcrop belt with the exception of the
Bellefontaine Outlier in Logn County. The Devonian
shale interval thickens eastward to over 3,500 ft (1,067
m) in extreme eastern Ohio (fig. 3). The Devonian An-
trim Shale (Ohio Shale equivalent) outcrops in north-
western Ohio at the southeastern edge of the Michigan
Basin and deepens basinward to the northwest.
Devonian shales are thought to be transgressive
basin-fill sequences related to active subsidence and
tectonism (Potter and others, 1981). Deposition of
these shales occurred in a shallow to deep foreland
basin setting west of the active Acadian orogenic belt.
Rapid transgression following the Middle Devonian
unconformity resulted in sediment covering the Cin-
cinnati and Findlay Arches. Controls on distribution
and preservation of organic matter remains in debate,
but the organics are thought to have been deposited
during anoxic to dysoxic conditions (Potter and oth-
ers, 1981). Black shales accumulated under low-energy
conditions in a euxinic basin across the region far
from the Acadian orogenic belt. These black shales are
deeper-water facies equivalent to the clastics deposited
from the Catskill delta to the east.
The top of the Devonian shale interval deepens basin-
ward from the outcrop belt in central Ohio to more than
1,250 ft (380 m) below sea level in extreme eastern Ohio
(fig. 4). Regional dip on the top of the Devonian shale in-
terval averages about 30 ft per mi (5.7 m per km), but this
may vary by local structural anomalies. The most promi-
nent structural feature is the northwest–southeast-trending
Cambridge Cross-Strike Structural Discontinuity. Three
major fault zones are evident at the top of the Devonian
shale interval and are named the Highlandtown Fault, the
Akron-Suffield Fault System, and the Middleburg Fault.
DISCUSSION
Source rock geochemistry provides the fundamental
information needed to evaluate and map the organic rich-
ness, type, and thermal maturity of a source rock. The re-
sulting maps are a necessary step to aid in determining the
stratigraphic and geographic extent of source rocks in the
Devonian shale petroleum system. The volume, organic
richness, and thermal maturity of these source rocks deter-
mine the amount of oil and gas that may be generated and
become available for traps.
Source Rock Geochemistry
The preliminary findings of source rock geochemistry
data for Ohio represent a first-round screening of Devo-
nian black shale source rock potential based on recent
and historical data. These data and interpretations do not
take into account the sample quality. Rock sample quality
for source rock measurements generally decrease in the
following order: conventional full-diameter core, side-
wall core, drill cuttings, and outcrops. Well cuttings may
be contaminated by caving material from higher in the
stratigraphic section or from drilling mud. Age of the rock
samples also affects their reliability and source rock mea-
surements. Samples that have been stored for long periods
of time generally are reliable if they are cleaned and stored
under proper conditions to restrict the growth of fungus
(Peters and Cassa, 1994). For this project, data that was
indicated to be suspect by the analytical laboratory was
removed for mapping and interpretation purposes. Ad-
ditional work is necessary to take into account the quality
and storage time of rock samples used for these source
rock measurements.
Source rock potential maps
Parameters to assess source rock generative potential for
hydrocarbon production include TOC, S1
, and S2
. Source
rock quality based on these parameters was defined by
Peters (1986; table 1). Maximum TOC values for the
Devonian shale interval in Ohio range from 0.5 to 18.4
percent in eastern and central Ohio (table A-1). Over 70
percent of the maximum TOC values per well were greater
than 4 percent (excellent source rock generative potential).
The maximum TOC map indicated a general westward
increase in values across the state (fig. 5). Extreme east-
ern Ohio typically had values ranging from 2 to 4 percent,
which is considered very good source rock generative
potential. West of the 4 percent contour, maximum TOC
was generally greater than 4 percent. The highest values
were in central Ohio along the Devonian shale outcrop
trend where maximum TOC values generally were greater
than 10 percent. All values along the outcrop trend were
taken from core samples. As noted previously, source rock
measurements from core often exceed those from well cut-
tings because they generally are sampled preferentially in
intervals of more organic-rich zones when compared with
well cuttings, where the samples are blended over a 10 to
20-ft (3–7-m) interval. When compared with maps and
data for the Upper Ordovician shale interval (Utica-Point
Pleasant units) published by the Ohio Division of Geologi-
cal Survey (2013a), the Devonian shale interval has sig-
nificantly higher TOC values than the deeper Ordovician
shales. Maximum TOC values for the Upper Ordovician
shale interval typically ranged from 2 to 3 percent with a
maximum value of 7.3 percent.
The S1
and S2
measurements also can be useful indica-
tors of source rock potential (Peters, 1986; Wallace and
Roen, 1989). Maximum S1
values range from 0.2 to 8.6 mg
HC/g of rock in Ohio (table A-1). A westward-increasing
trend of higher S1
measurements, similar to the TOC trend,
is reflected on the S1
isopleth map (fig. 6). Extreme eastern
Ohio is generally in the 1 to 2 mg HC/g range, which is
7
IN
WV
KY
PA
MI
ERIE
LAKE
Ross
Stark
Pike
Wood
Darke
Knox
Licking
Scioto
Adams
Gallia
Wayne
Huron
Perry
Clark
Allen
Butler
Lorain
Seneca
Logan
Brown
Athens
Union
Trumbull
Meigs
Ashtabula
Hardin
Henry
Franklin
Preble
Noble
Mercer
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Miami
Belmont
Hancock
Vinton
Fairfield
Putnam
Highland
Lucas
Carroll
Shelby
Richland
Monroe
Clinton
Greene
Muskingum
Fayette
Marion
Warren
Medina
Holmes
Pickaway
Guernsey
Morgan
Madison
Washington
Coshocton
Geauga
Jackson
Hocking
Summit
Ashland
Morrow
Lake
Clermont
Tuscarawas
Delaware
Williams
Harrison
Paulding
Defiance
Lawrence
Auglaize
Van Wert
Cuyahoga
Wyandot
Hamilton
Columbiana
Jefferson
Crawford
Sandusky
Mahoning
Champaign
Ottawa
Montgomery
3250
2750
2500
2250
2000
1750
1500
1250
1000
750
50
0
2750
2000
1000
1750
1500
1250
750
500
250
0
3500
2500
3250
3000
250
3000
250
250
3500
ASFS
HF
MF
CCSD
250-ft contour
Fault
Thickness, in ft
3,530 (1,076 m)
0
0 50 Miles
0 50 Kilometers
FIGURE 3. Map of interval thickness of the Devonian Shale interval. Modified from Wickstrom and others (2005).
Ohio Shale outcrop
Akron-Suffield Fault System
Cambridge Cross-Strike Structural Discontinuity
Highlandtown Fault
Middleburg Fault
ASFS =
CCSD =
HF =
MF =
FIGURE 3. Map of interval thickness of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Modified from Wickstrom and others (2005).
8
IN
WV
KY
PA
MI
ERIE
LAKE
Ross
Stark
Pike
Wood
Darke
Knox
Licking
Scioto
Adams
Gallia
Wayne
Huron
Perry
Clark
Allen
Butler
Lorain
Seneca
Logan
Brown
Athens
Union
Trumbull
Meigs
Ashtabula
Hardin
Henry
Franklin
Preble
Noble
Mercer
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Miami
Belmont
Hancock
Vinton
Fairfield
Putnam
Highland
Lucas
Carroll
Shelby
Richland
Monroe
Clinton
Greene
Muskingum
Fayette
Marion
Warren
Medina
Holmes
Pickaway
Guernsey
Morgan
Madison
Washington
Coshocton
Geauga
Jackson
Hocking
Summit
Ashland
Morrow
Lake
Clermont
Tuscarawas
Delaware
Williams
Harrison
Paulding
Defiance
Lawrence
Auglaize
Van Wert
Cuyahoga
Wyandot
Hamilton
Columbiana
Jefferson
Crawford
Sandusky
Mahoning
Champaign
Ottawa
Montgomery
250
0
-250
-500
-750
-1000
750
500
1000
750
7
50
500
500
250
-1250
750
1000
750
750
750
750
-1250
-1250
ASFS
HF
MF
CCSD
250-ft contour
Fault
Elevation, in ft
1,070 (326 m)
-1,505 (-459 m)
0 50 Miles
0 50 Kilometers
FIGURE 4. Structure map on top of the Devonian Shale interval in eastern Ohio. Modified from Wickstrom and others (2005).
Akron-Suffield Fault System
Cambridge Cross-Strike Structural Discontinuity
Highlandtown Fault
Middleburg Fault
ASFS =
CCSD =
HF =
MF =
Ohio Shale outcrop
FIGURE 4. Structure map on top of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Modified from Wickstrom and others (2005).
9
FIGURE 5. Isopleth map of the maximum total organic carbon (TOC) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
IN
WV
KY
PA
MI
ERIE
LAKE
Ross
Stark
Pike
Wood
Darke
Knox
Licking
Scioto
Adams
Gallia
Wayne
Huron
Perry
Clark
Allen
Butler
Lorain
Seneca
Logan
Brown
Athens
Union
Trumbull
Meigs
Ashtabula
Hardin
Henry
Franklin
Preble
Noble
Mercer
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Miami
Belmont
Hancock
Vinton
Fairfield
Putnam
Highland
Lucas
Carroll
Shelby
Richland
Monroe
Clinton
Greene
Muskingum
Fayette
Marion
Warren
Medina
Holmes
Pickaway
Guernsey
Morgan
Madison
Washington
Coshocton
Geauga
Jackson
Hocking
Summit
Ashland
Morrow
Lake
Clermont
Tuscarawas
Delaware
Williams
Harrison
Paulding
Defiance
Lawrence
Auglaize
Van Wert
Cuyahoga
Wyandot
Hamilton
Columbiana
Jefferson
Crawford
Sandusky
Mahoning
Champaign
Ottawa
Montgomery
5
2
5
4
10
3
5
3
5 3
3
2
10
5
5
4
5
4
4
3
3
2
5
4
5
4
4
3
5
5
6
10
5
4
3
5
10
5
4
4
2
2
2
5
3
4
3
1
3
1 0
10
5
5
5
4
3
3
1
4
4
7.4
7.1
6.6
6.2
1.3
7.3
1.5
13
3.5
8.7
6
4.4
3.6
5.45.3
4.5
2.9
3.8
2.3
7.4
3.4
3.6
5.2
8.8
5.8
6
13.8
7.3
9.6
9.1
4 3.9
4.8
7.1
2.91.1
3.6
2.8
5.2
5.1
7.7
4
3.9
8.2
4.3
3.3
7.6
6.7 2.7
2.3
11.7
4.4
3.7
2.7
3
4.9
1.5
6.3
1.3
1.6
4.4
4
3.7
5.6
9
3
1.2
12.6
4.6
5.4
5.2
7.3
8.1
4.4
8.3
6.1
8.6
1.9
8.4
3.6
2.61.8
5.3
2.6
2.4
3.4
1.1
5.3
4.7
6.1
2.4
6
3.6
2.5
4.8
1.7
5.5
3.6
3.7 1.9
11.3
4.3
3.6
8
4.9
8.8
6.6
2.2
1.5
4.1
12.1
3.6
12.6
16.6
9.2
9.9
12.718.4
3.9
14.4
13.7
11.4
11.2
11.3
12.1
12.5
11.9
11.5
10.5
11.7
11.9
11.6
10.3
8.6
8.5
11.1
14
12.8
14.3
12.4
14.4
10.8
13.3
11.2 10.5
8.9
10.9
10
12.1
12.1
10.9
11.2
10.6
10.8
18.3
13.313.8
14.2
13.6
13.6
14.2 13.5
14.4
6.3
TOC data source
TOC contour
TOC maximum, weight %
High : 18.4%
Low : 0.5%
0 50 Miles
0 50 Kilometers
FIGURE 5. Isopleth map of the maximum total organic carbon (TOC) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
Ohio Shale outcrop
10
FIGURE 6. Isopleth map of the maximum S1
(existing hydrocarbons) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
IN
WV
KY
PA
MI
ERIE
LAKE
Ross
Stark
Pike
Wood
Darke
Knox
Licking
Scioto
Adams
Gallia
Wayne
Huron
Perry
Clark
Allen
Butler
Lorain
Seneca
Logan
Brown
Athens
Union
Trumbull
Meigs
Ashtabula
Hardin
Henry
Franklin
Preble
Noble
Mercer
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Miami
Belmont
Hancock
Vinton
Fairfield
Putnam
Highland
Lucas
Carroll
Shelby
Richland
Monroe
Clinton
Greene
Muskingum
Fayette
Marion
Warren
Medina
Holmes
Pickaway
Guernsey
Morgan
Madison
Washington
Coshocton
Geauga
Jackson
Hocking
Summit
Ashland
Morrow
Lake
Clermont
Tuscarawas
Delaware
Williams
Harrison
Paulding
Defiance
Lawrence
Auglaize
Van Wert
Cuyahoga
Wyandot
Hamilton
Columbiana
Jefferson
Crawford
Sandusky
Mahoning
Champaign
Ottawa
Montgomery
3
1
4
3
3
1
4
3
2
3
2
2
1
3
1
3
2
4
2
2
1
3
2
1
2
3
2
3
2
4
3
4
3
2
1
1
0.5
4
2
1
1
4
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
2
1
2 2
4
0.50.5
2
2
0.5 0.5
4
3
2
0.5
2
1
1
3
0.6
1.7
1.8
1.5
2
0.8
2.6
0.7
3
1.4
3.1
3.6
1.72
1.92.4
2.8
0.7
1
1.2
2.5
1.3
2
1.5
2
1.4
3
0.5
2
4.7
1.4 1.6
0.9
1.1
0.7
0.6
2.2
1.1
2.5
0.9
2.3
2.9
0.8
2.2
2
1.6
4.7
4.6 1.3
1
2.7
1.1
1.4
1
1.5
1.8 4.3
0.60.4
0.5
2.2
1
2.3
2.4
0.8
0.4
6.5
2.2
2
2.4
1.9
5.2
1.2
2
4.9
0.8
5.7
1.1
0.80.4
1.6
0.8
1.1
1.1
0.4
1.3
1.8
1.7
2
1.1
2.4
0.8
1.4
3
0.3
1.2
2.5
2.4
5.6
2
2.2
8.1
2.6
2.8
3.3
1.3 0.4
2.1
4.4
2.2
2
1.7
4
4.8
4.5
5.97.3
2.3
S1 data source
S1 contour
S1 maximum, generative potential
8.6
0.2
0 50 Miles
0 50 Kilometers
FIGURE 6. Isopleth map of the maximum S1 (existing hydrocarbons) for the Devonian Shale interval in eastern Ohio.
Ohio Shale outcrop
11
considered to be good source rock generation potential
(table A-1). Measurements of S1
and S2
were not taken for
the cores along the Devonian shale outcrop trend. Thus
the majority of measurements for these maps are from
well cuttings. The S2
measurements for the Devonian
shale interval range from 0.5 to 115 mg HC/g of rock in
Ohio (table A-1). Extreme eastern Ohio contains S2
values
of less than 5 mg HC/g of rock (fair source rock generative
potential). Most values are in the 10–20 (very good source
rock generative potential) or 20–40 mg HC/g of rock range
(excellent source rock generative potential). The S2
map
reflects a similar westward-increasing trend with the TOC
and S1
maps (fig. 7).
Thermal maturity maps
Maximum vitrinite reflectance values for the Devonian
shale interval in Ohio ranged from 0.33 to 1.34 %Ro
(table
A-1). A basinward (eastward) transition to more thermally
mature rocks is evident on the %Ro
isograds (fig. 8). An
immature region is evident throughout central and west-
ern Ohio where values trending northeast–southwest are
less than 0.6 %Ro
. Four local anomalies are present west
of the 0.6 %Ro
isograd where values exceed the 0.6 cutoff.
These anomalies may be a result of false measurements
from well cuttings that were not indigenous to the zone of
interest. The onset of oil generation is considered to begin
at 0.6 and to end at 1.1 %Ro
(table 2). This narrow zone
is present on the isograd map of the maximum vitrinite
reflectance and trends northeast–southwest through east-
ern Ohio (fig. 8). The oil window transitions eastward to
a condensate or wet gas window based on a thermal ma-
turity of 1.1 to 1.4 %Ro
(fig. 8). Using a cutoff of 1.4 %Ro
,
a dry gas window is not evident in the mapped area of
Ohio but is shown to the east on regional maps of extreme
western Pennsylvania and West Virginia by Ryder and
others (2013) and Repetski and others (2014). As expected,
%Ro
values were lower than those on the deeper Upper
Ordovician %Ro
map (Ohio Division of Geological Survey,
2013b), but displayed the same eastward-maturing trend.
The phenomenon described by Lo (1993) as “vitrin-
ite reflectance suppression” or underestimation of %Ro
values has been recognized by numerous authors for the
Devonian shale interval in the northern Appalachian Basin
(Milici and Swezey, 2006; Hackley and others, 2013; Ryder
and others, 2013; Repetski and others. 2014). Evidence
for Devonian shale “vitrinite suppression” is supported
by comparison to values in the overlying Pennsylvanian
coals and the position of Devonian shale natural gas fields
compared with mapped %Ro
values in eastern Ohio.
Devonian shale %Ro
values commonly are lower than
those for the overlying coals that are 1,500 to 2,000 ft (450-
600m)shallower. The %Ro(max)
of 0.6 for the Pennsylvanian
isograd is up to 50 mi (80km) west of the 0.5 %Ro
isograd
for the Devonian shale interval (Ryder and others, 2013).
Assuming the Pennsylvanian coal vitrinite measurements
are accurate, this creates an inverted thermal maturity
profile and indicates that the Devonian shale %Ro
values
are anomalously low. Explanations for this “vitrinite sup-
pression” are related to syndepositional and post-burial
processes that include bitumen impregnation, host rock
lithology, overpressure, variations in vitrinite precursor
material, and incorporation of organic sulfur (Hutton and
Cook, 1980; Price and Barker, 1985; McTavish, 1998; Carr,
2000; Barker and others, 2007; Ryder and others, 2013).
The production of dry gas and absence of produced
liquids from the Devonian shale in southeastern Ohio also
indicates a thermal maturity greater than that indicated by
the %Ro
map. Devonian shale producing fields in south-
eastern Ohio are dominated by dry gas production with no
oil reported (Riley and others, 2004). The vitrinite reflec-
tance map shows values ranging from 0.6 to 1.0 %Ro
(oil
window) in these dry gas producing fields. These produc-
tion numbers are further evidence that the vitrinite reflec-
tance values may be suppressed. If these thermal maturity
measurements are accurate, then natural gas likely mi-
grated from the deeper part of the basin to the east.	
All data for the CAI map was based upon a published
report by Repetski and others (2008), and since no ad-
ditional data was available for this project, the CAI map
closely resembles that from their published study. The
immature, oil, gas-and-oil, and gas windows are evident
from this mapped data and also show an increased ma-
turity basinward (fig. 9). The immature boundary (using
a CAI value of 1 or less) that trends roughly north–south
through central Ohio is influenced by a lack of data in
western Ohio. The onset of oil generation is generally
considered to begin at a CAI value of 1.0 and end at 2.0.
Additional data points in eastern Ohio currently are being
analyzed for CAI measurements but were not available for
this publication.
CONCLUSIONS
During the past decade, exploration in the Devonian
organic-rich black shale interval using horizontal drill-
ing and massive hydraulic fracturing has generated
additional source rock geochemistry data for this pro-
lific, unconventional oil-and-gas play in Ohio, Penn-
sylvania, and West Virginia. Up to now, the focus of
this drilling and exploration has been in the Marcellus
Shale, the basal unit of the Devonian shale sequence.
Based on historic conventional production and source
rock geochemistry compiled for this project, other
Devonian organic-rich shale units, such as the lower
Huron Shale Member and Rhinestreet Shale Member,
also have significant potential and are good candidates
for modern-day horizontal drilling techniques.
Devonian shale source rock geochemistry and ther-
mal maturity data was compiled from a detailed inven-
tory of all published and archived sources to provide a
12
FIGURE 7. Isopleth map of the maximum S2
(hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
IN
WV
KY
PA
MI
ERIE
LAKE
Ross
Stark
Pike
Wood
Darke
Knox
Licking
Scioto
Adams
Gallia
Wayne
Huron
Perry
Clark
Allen
Butler
Lorain
Seneca
Logan
Brown
Athens
Union
Trumbull
Meigs
Ashtabula
Hardin
Henry
Franklin
Preble
Noble
Mercer
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Miami
Belmont
Hancock
Vinton
Fairfield
Putnam
Highland
Lucas
Carroll
Shelby
Richland
Monroe
Clinton
Greene
Muskingum
Fayette
Marion
Warren
Medina
Holmes
Pickaway
Guernsey
Morgan
Madison
Washington
Coshocton
Geauga
Jackson
Hocking
Summit
Ashland
Morrow
Lake
Clermont
Tuscarawas
Delaware
Williams
Harrison
Paulding
Defiance
Lawrence
Auglaize
Van Wert
Cuyahoga
Wyandot
Hamilton
Columbiana
Jefferson
Crawford
Sandusky
Mahoning
Champaign
Ottawa
Montgomery
25
5
35
30
25
20
15
10
40
20
35
30
25
25
20
201510
20
10
35
25
15
10
10
5
105
10
5
15
15
10
40
25
35
35
40 35
40
30
20
15
35
30
25
20
20
15
5
5
20
2
0
10
5
35
3
0
25
25
25
5
2
0
25
15
10
35.3
34
29.5
22.1
32.1
3.3
28.8
16.4
10.9
3.6
1013.4
7.3
9.6
13.4
20.3
8.2
36.5
15.9
14.9
20.7
41.7
25.9
29
18
36.3
39.7
18.9 20
15.6
19.1
7.5
2.1
12.8
6.1
25.9
18.9
44.4
14.1
19.3
44.3
4.3
2.9
39.1
31.7
8.9
7.3
24.1
9.9
13.8
8.2
8.5
18.1 27.3
2.62.8
11.6
18.4
20.9
20.4
11.8
5.6
1.6
28.6
22.3
20.7
21.2
33.4
41.2
21
29.3
55.9
5
37
10.3
8.9
6.6
15.9
7.5
8.912.3
2.1
26.1
30
9.3
12.1
5.9
13.6
4.1
4.3
14.6
3.7
19.5
33.1
13.6
73.7
11.4
5.3
42
24.2
31.5
20.7
5.5 1.3
14.9
55.7
9.343.6
34.4
51
39.4
67.9
65.3115
5.8
S2 data source
S2 contour
S2 maximum, generative potential
115
0.5
0 50 Miles
0 50 Kilometers
FIGURE 7. Isopleth map of the maximum S2 (hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis) for the Devonian shale interval in Ohio.
Ohio Shale outcrop
13
FIGURE 8. Isograd map of the maximum vitrinite reflectance (%Ro
) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
ERIE
LAKE
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.59
0.72
1.04
0.42
0.35
0.45
0.44
0.41
0.44
0.61
0.72
0.78
0.45
0.39
0.72
1.34
0.76
0.46
0.75
0.79
0.78
0.43
0.55
1.16
0.46
0.43
0.43
0.4
0.57
0.42
0.44
0.62
0.92
0.62
0.64
0.7
0.8
0.72
1.28
0.51
0.69
0.67
0.59
0.82
0.62
0.43
0.98
0.42
0.42
0.33
0.48
0.480.46
0.49
1.06
14
FIGURE 9. Isograd map of the conodont alteration index (CAI) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
IN
WV
KY
PA
MI
ERIE
LAKE
Ross
Stark
Pike
Wood
Darke
Knox
Licking
Scioto
Adams
Gallia
Wayne
Huron
Perry
Clark
Allen
Butler
Lorain
Seneca
Logan
Brown
Athens
Union
Trumbull
Meigs
Ashtabula
Hardin
Henry
Franklin
Preble
Noble
Mercer
Portage
Erie
Fulton
Miami
Belmont
Hancock
Vinton
Fairfield
Putnam
Highland
Lucas
Carroll
Shelby
Richland
Monroe
Clinton
Greene
Muskingum
Fayette
Marion
Warren
Medina
Holmes
Pickaway
Guernsey
Morgan
Madison
Washington
Coshocton
Geauga
Jackson
Hocking
Summit
Ashland
Morrow
Lake
Clermont
Tuscarawas
Delaware
Williams
Harrison
Paulding
Defiance
Lawrence
Auglaize
Van Wert
Cuyahoga
Wyandot
Hamilton
Columbiana
Jefferson
Crawford
Sandusky
Mahoning
Champaign
Ottawa
Montgomery
1
1
1
1.5
2
1.5
1.5
2
1.5
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1+
1+
1+
1.5
1+
1+
1.5
1+
1.5
1.5
CAI data source
CAI contour
1
1.5
2
0 50 Miles
0 50 Kilometers
FIGURE 9. Isograd map of the conodont alteration index (CAI) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
Ohio Shale outcrop
CAI maximum
<1
1–1.5
1.5–2
>2
15
comprehensive database from 201 wells in eastern and
central Ohio. Preliminary maps of TOC, S1
, S2
, %Ro
,
and CAI were constructed to better refine the source
rock generative potential and thermal maturity of the
Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
Maximum TOC values per well for the Devonian
shale interval range from 0.5 to 18.4 percent. A west-
ward increase in TOC is present with over 70 percent
of the wells having values greater than 4 percent
(excellent source rock generative potential). Devonian
shale maximum TOC values along the outcrop trend
usually exceed 10 percent. The maximum TOC value
of the Devonian shale interval is over twice that of
the underlying Upper Ordovician Utica-Point Pleasant
shale interval, which has a maximum value of 7.3 per-
cent and values typically in the 2 to 3 percent range.
The S1
and S2
values in the Devonian shale interval
also indicate good source rock generative potential
and maps display a westward increase similar to the
TOC map. Maximum S1
values per well range from 0.2
to 8.6 mg HC/g of rock. In eastern Ohio the S1
values
generally range from 1 to 2 mg HC/g of rock, which
is indicative of good source rock generative potential.
Maximum S2
values are often in the 10–20 (very good)
or 20–40 (excellent) mg HC/g rock range.
Vitrinite reflectance and CAI were mapped to assess
the thermal maturity of the Devonian shale interval
in eastern Ohio. A basinward (eastward) transition to
more thermally mature rocks is evident on both maps.
Maximum vitrinite reflectance values range from 0.33
to 1.34 %Ro
. A 0.6 %Ro
isograd trends northeast–
southwest through eastern Ohio and marks the onset
of oil generation and separates the immature region
to the west. The oil window transitions eastward to
a condensate or wet gas window at values between
1.1 and 1.4 %Ro
in extreme eastern Ohio. “Vitrinite
suppression” is supported by previous USGS studies,
comparison to %Ro
in the overlying coals, and also
with historic production numbers in southeastern
Ohio, which indicate natural gas production with no
liquids. Further study is recommended to account for
the apparent “vitrinite suppression” and better refine
the %Ro
map. A limited dataset of 17 wells were used
for the CAI map. The immature boundary trends ap-
proximately north–south in central Ohio based on CAI
values of 1 or less. Onset of oil generation is generally
considered to begin at a CAI of 1.0 and end at 2.0.
The preliminary maps and data generated for this
report are a result of Ohio Geological Survey efforts
to provide an updated compilation of information to
assist explorationists in assessing this important and
high potential oil-and-gas play. Thickness, depth, and
pressure are additional geologic factors, as are current
economic pricing conditions, which need to be taken
into account in the assessment and exploration strat-
egy of these organic-rich Devonian shale zones.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I gratefully acknowledge all of the operators who
have submitted source rock geochemistry data.
Thanks also go to the U.S. Geological Survey for its
continuing research on this topic and for the analy-
ses it has performed on Ohio samples over the years.
Without USGS data, this study would not have been
possible. Thanks to Dean Martin of the ODNR Office
of Information Technology for doing the final revi-
sions to the maps, to Matt Erenpreiss for assisting with
figures, and to Joe Wells for providing assistance in
the database compilation. This manuscript was greatly
improved because of the edits of Chuck Salmons. The
assistance of reviewers Mohammad Fakhari and Tom
Serenko is greatly appreciated. Finally, thanks to Dave
Orr of the ODNR Creative Services group for the final
compilation of this report.
REFERENCES CITED
Baranoski, M.T., and Riley, R.A., 2013, Analysis of
stratigraphic, structural, and production relation-
ships of Devonian shale as reservoirs in Meigs
County, Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Resourc-
es, Division of Geological Survey Open-File Report
88-3, 29 p.
Barker, C.E., Lewan, M.D., and Pawlewicz, M.J., 2007,
The influence of extractable organic matter on vi-
trinite reflectance suppression—A survey of kero-
gen and coal types: International Journal of Coal
Geology, v. 70, p. 67–78.
Boswell, Ray, 1996, Play UDs—Upper Devonian black
shales, in Roen, J.B., and Walker, B.J., eds., The
atlas of major Appalachian Basin gas plays: West
Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Publica-
tion V25, p. 93–99.
Carr, A.D., 2000, Suppression and retardation of vitrin-
ite reflectance, part 1—Formation and significance
for hydrocarbon generation: Journal of Petroleum
Geology, v. 23, p. 313–343.
East, J.A., Swezey, C.S., Repetski, J.E., and Hayba,
D.O., 2012, Thermal maturity map of Devonian
shale in the Illinois, Michigan, and Appalachian
basins of North America: U.S. Geological Survey
Scientific Investigations Map 3214, scale 1:24,000.
Erenpreiss, M.S., Wickstrom, L.H., Perry, C.J., Riley,
R.A., Martin, D.R., and others, 2011, Organic-
thickness map of the Marcellus Shale in Ohio: Ohio
Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geo-
logical Survey, scale 1 inch equals 27 miles.
EXLOG and Brown and Ruth Laboratories, 1988, Well
16
sample/borehole diagnostic methods for tight black
shales—Final report (October, 1985–August, 1988)
prepared for GRI: Gas Research Institute report per
Contract No. 5085-213-1181, 28 p., 5 appendices.
Gray, J.D., and others, 1982, An integrated study of
the Devonian-age black shales in eastern Ohio:
Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Geological Survey final report for U.S. DOE East-
ern Gas Shales Project, U.S Department of Energy
Report No. DOE/ET/12131-1399.
Hackley, P.C., Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., and Alimi,
Hossein, 2013, Thermal maturity of northern Ap-
palachian Basin Devonian shales—Insights from
sterane and terpane biomarkers: Fuel, v. 106, p.
445-462.	
Harris, A.G., 1979, Conodont color alteration, an orga-
no-mineral metamorphic index, and its application
to Appalachian Basin geology, in Scholle, P.A., and
Schluger, P.R., eds., Aspects of diagenesis: Society
of Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publi-
cation 26, p. 3–16.
Hutton, A.C., and Cook, A.C., 1980, Influence of al-
ginite on the reflectance of vitrinite: Fuel, v. 59, p.
711–716.
Lo, H.B., 1993, Correction criteria for the suppression
of vitrinite reflectance in hydrogen-rich kerogens;
Preliminary guidelines: Organic Geochemistry, v.
20, no. 6, p. 653–657.
McCarthy, Kevin, Rojas, Katherine, Niemann, Martin,
Palmoski, Daniel, Peters, K.E., and Stankiewicz,
Arthur, 2011, Basic petroleum geochemistry for
source rock evaluation: Oilfield Review, v. 23, no.
2, p. 32–43.
McTavish, R.A., 1998, The role of overpressure in the
retardation of organic matter maturation: Journal of
Petroleum Geology, v. 21, p. 153–186.
Milici, R.C., and Swezey, C.S., 2006, Assessment of
Appalachian Basin oil and gas resources—Devo-
nian shale–Middle and Upper Paleozoic total pe-
troleum system: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File
Report Series 2006-1237, 70 p.
Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 1988, Analysis of
stratigraphic and production relationships of De-
vonian shale gas reservoirs in Ohio: Ohio Depart-
ment of Natural Resources, Division of Geological
Survey final report (October 1985–November 1988)
prepared for Gas Research Institute Contract No.
5085-213-1154, 49 p., 15 pls.
Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 2013a, Maximum
TOC value per well of the Upper Ordovician shale
interval in Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Re-
sources, Division of Geological Survey map, scale
1:2,000,000, accessed December 18, 2015, <http://
geosurvey.ohiodnr.gov/portals/geosurvey/Energy/
Utica/Ordov-Shale_TOC-Max_03-2013.pdf>.
Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 2013b, Calculated
%Ro
average per well of the Upper Ordovician shale
interval in Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Re-
sources, Division of Geological Survey map, scale
1:2,000,000, accessed December 18, 2015, <http://
geosurvey.ohiodnr.gov/portals/geosurvey/Energy/
Utica/Ordov-Shale_Ro-Average_03-2013.pdf>.
Owen, L.B., Holland, M.T., Strawn, J.A., Schrauf,
T.W., DiBona, B.G., Sitler, G., and Truman, R.B.,
1985, Devonian shale exploration-production stud-
ies—Southeast Ohio data book, Jackson/Vinton
counties: Gas Research Institute report per Contract
No. 5083-213-0874, 235 p., 5 appendices.
Peters, K.E., 1986, Guidelines for evaluating petroleum
source rocks using programmed pyrolysis: AAPG
Bulletin, v. 70, no. 3, p. 318–329.
Peters, K.E., and Cassa, M.R., 1994, Applied source
rock geochemistry, in Magoon, L.B., and Dow,
W.G., eds., The petroleum system—From source to
trap: AAPG Memoir 60, p. 93–120.
Potter, P.E., Maynard, J.B., and Pryor, W.A., 1981,
Sedimentology of gas-bearing Devonian shales of
the Appalachian Basin: University of Cincinnati,
H.N. Fisk Laboratory of Sedimentology, 20 p.
Potter, P.E., Maynard, J.B., and Pryor, W.A., 1982, Ap-
palachian gas bearing Devonian shales—statements
and discussions: Oil and Gas journal, v. 80, no. 4,
p. 290–302.
Price, L.C., and Barker, C.E., 1985, Suppression of
vitrinite reflectance in amorphous rich kerogen—A
major unrecognized problem: Journal of Petroleum
Geology, v. 8, p. 59–84.
Repetski, J.E., Ryder, R.T., Weary, D.J., Harris, A.G.,
and Trippi, M.H., 2008, Thermal maturity patterns
(CAI and %Ro
) in Upper Ordovician and Devonian
rocks of the Appalachian basin—A major revision
of USGS Map I–917–E using new subsurface collec-
tions: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investiga-
tions Map 3006.
Repetski, J.E., Ryder, R.T., Weary, D.J., Harris, A.G.,
and Trippi, M.H., 2014, Thermal maturity pat-
terns (conodont color alteration index and vitrinite
reflectance) in Upper Ordovician and Devonian
rocks of the Appalachian basin—A major revision
of USGS Map I–917–E using new subsurface collec-
tions, chap. F.1 of Ruppert, L.F., and Ryder, R.T.,
eds., Coal and petroleum resources in the Appala-
17
chian basin; Distribution, geologic framework, and
geochemical character: U.S. Geological Survey Pro-
fessional Paper 1708, 27 p., 11 oversized figures, ac-
cessed at <http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/pp1708F.1>.
Rich, J.L., 1951, Probable fondo origin of Marcellus-
Ohio-New Albany-Chattanooga bituminous shales:
AAPG Bulletin, v. 47, no. 8, p. 2017–2040.
Riley, R.A., Baranoski, M.T., and Wickstrom, L.H.,
2004, Oil and gas fields map of Ohio: Ohio Depart-
ment of Natural Resources, Division of Geological
Survey Map PG-1, scale 1:500,000.
Roen, J.B., and Kepferle, R.C., eds., 1993, Petroleum
geology of the Devonian and Mississippian black
shale of eastern North America: U.S. Geological
Survey Bulletin 1909, 13 pls.
Rowan, E.L., 2006, Burial and thermal history of the
central Appalachian Basin, based on three 2-D
models of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia:
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1019,
35 p.
Ryder, R.T., Hackley, P.C., Alimi, Hossein, and Trippi,
M.H., 2013, Evaluation of thermal maturity in
the low maturity Devonian shales of the northern
Appalachian Basin: AAPG Search and Discovery
Article No. 10477, 67 p., 6 appendices.
U.S. DOE, 2007, Western U.S. gas sands, secondary
gas recovery, eastern U.S. gas shales, methane hy-
drates, deep source gas, general UGR, and methane
gas recovery from coalbeds: U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy
Technology Laboratory Natural Gas Program Ar-
chive, 2 CDs.
Wallace, L.G., and Roen, J.B., 1989, Petroleum source
rock potential of the Upper Ordovician black shale
sequence, northern Appalachian Basin: U.S. Geo-
logical Survey Open-File Report 89-488, 66 p.
Weil, S.A., Feldkirchner, H.L., Punwani, D.V., and
Jana, J.C., 1978, The IGT Hytort™ process for
hydrogen retorting of Devonian oil shales, [paper
presented at] The Chattanooga Shale Conference,
Oak Ridge, Tenn., November 14, 1978: Institute of
Gas Technology, 34 p.
Wickstrom, L. H., Venteris, E. R., Harper, J. A., and 26
other authors, 2005, Characterization of geologic
sequestration opportunities in the MRCSP region:
Final report under DOE cooperative agreement no.
DE-PS26-05NT42255, 152 p.
18
API	
  NO. PERM	
  NO. CORE	
  # CUTTING	
  #
COUNTY	
  
NAME
SOURCE	
  OF	
  DATA COMPANY	
  NAME
MAX	
  
TOC	
  (%)
MAX	
  
%RO	
  
MAX	
  S1	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
(mg	
  HC/g	
  
of	
  rock)
MAX	
  S2	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
(mg	
  HC/g	
  of	
  
rock)
MAX	
  
CAI
4701100537 537 NA NA Cabell Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Cyclops	
  Corp. 1.5
4705100221 221 NA NA Marshall Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Allied	
  Chemicals 2
4705300069 69 NA NA Mason Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) United	
  Fuel	
  Gas 1.5
4710700756 756 NA NA Wood Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Exxon	
  Co. 2
34001600130000 60013 2718 Adams ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 14.44
34001600140000 60014 2719 Adams ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.71
34005230410000 23041 3461 Ashland ODGS	
  core	
  records Deep	
  Resources	
  Llc 5.51 0.616 1.2 19.51
34007200030000 20003 68 Ashtabula ODGS	
  core	
  records Magnolia	
  Pet.	
  Co. 4 0.61 13.05
34007200150000 20015 440 Ashtabula ODGS	
  core	
  records Benedum	
  -­‐	
  Trees	
  Oil	
  Co. 7.36 1.72 35.26
34007200280000 20028 2008 Ashtabula ODGS	
  core	
  records Platco	
  Corp. 7.08 1.79 33.96
34007200960000 20096 846 Ashtabula ODGS	
  core	
  records Lenox	
  Truck	
  &	
  Dozer 6.63 1.47 29.5
34007200990000 20099 850 Ashtabula ODGS	
  core	
  records Northern	
  Natural	
  Gas	
  Prod.	
  Co. 6.15 1.98 22.05
34007202130000 20213 2238 Ashtabula Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Petrox,	
  Inc. 1.28 0.81 2.51
34007202660000 20266 2306 Ashtabula ODGS	
  core	
  records Dietrich	
  Philip	
  H. 7.29 2.58 32.12
34007205240000 20524 2933 Ashtabula Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Petrox,	
  Inc. 1.47 0.66 3.34
34007210870000 21087 2839 Ashtabula ODGS	
  core	
  records Bessemer	
  &	
  Lake	
  Erie	
  Rr 13.01 0.49
34007210870000 21087 2839 Ashtabula Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Bessemer	
  &	
  Lake	
  Erie	
  Rr 7.89 0.59 2.98 28.76 1.5
34009217690000 21769 3095 Athens ODGS	
  core	
  records Premier	
  Energy	
  Corp. 3.54 0.72 1.37 16.43
34009219160000 21916 3727 Athens ODGS	
  core	
  records Partners	
  Oil	
  Co. 3.64 0.64 2.48 33.11
34009219630000 21963 3738 Athens ODGS	
  core	
  records Marshall	
  Reba	
  M. 3.69 0.7 2.43 13.61
34009229690000 22969 4961 Athens ODGS	
  core	
  records Atha	
  Edward	
  E. 1.87 0.634 0.21 2.07
34013201290000 20129 166 Belmont ODGS	
  core	
  records Texas	
  Co. 8.73 3.09 10.87
34013202770000 20277 2842 Belmont Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 5.97 1.04 3.58 3.62
34013202790000 20279 3473 Belmont Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Ky.	
  Crude	
  Oil	
  &	
  Gas	
  Co.	
  Inc. 0.47 0.2 0.49
34019208350000 20835 2845 Carroll ODGS	
  core	
  records Petrox,	
  Inc. 6.33
34029201520000 20152 227 Columbiana ODGS	
  core	
  records Dominion	
  East	
  Ohio 4.4 1.66 9.99
34029206000000 20600 2279 Columbiana ODGS	
  core	
  records Pin	
  Oak	
  Petroleum	
  Inc. 3.57 1.95 13.41
34029206040000 20604 2247 Columbiana ODGS	
  core	
  records Tri-­‐State	
  Producing	
  Co. 5.43 1.86 7.35
34029206070000 20607 2246 Columbiana ODGS	
  core	
  records Pin	
  Oak	
  Petroleum	
  Inc. 5.31 2.39 11.21
34029206560000 20656 2411 Columbiana ODGS	
  core	
  records Statewide	
  Oil	
  &	
  Gas	
  Co. 4.45 2.76 9.59
34031212740000 21274 795 Coshocton ODGS	
  core	
  records W.H.	
  Bears 2.94 0.66 13.36
34031220950000 22095 2790 Coshocton ODGS	
  core	
  records Samples,	
  James	
  F. 3.82 1.02 20.3
34031221390000 22139 2953 Coshocton Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 2.27 0.42 1.17 8.24 1.5
34031224600000 22460 3252 Coshocton ODGS	
  core	
  records Redman	
  Oil	
  Co. 7.42 2.54 36.51
34031225700000 22570 3379 Coshocton ODGS	
  core	
  records Cyclops	
  Corp. 3.39 1.26 15.89
34031260030000 26003 3903 Coshocton Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Rhdk	
  Oil	
  &	
  Gas	
  Llc/Dba	
  Red	
  Hil 3.59 1.98 14.94
34033600410000 60041 2722 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.38
34033600420000 60042 2723 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.19
34033600440000 60044 2725 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.34
34033600450000 60045 2726 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.11
34033600460000 60046 2727 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.53
34033600470000 60047 2728 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.86
34033600480000 60048 2729 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.31
34033600490000 60049 2730 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.54
34033600500000 60050 2731 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.48
34033600510000 60051 2732 Crawford ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.72
34035200570000 20057 60 Cuyahoga ODGS	
  core	
  records Benedum-­‐Trees	
  Co. 5.18 1.47 20.72
34041600120000 60012 2648 Delaware Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Ohio	
  Div.	
  Of	
  Geological	
  Survey 8.82 0.35 1.96 41.7
34041600130000 60013 2736 Delaware ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.85
34041600140000 60014 2737 Delaware ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.6
34043200050000 20005 734 Erie Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Nickel	
  Plate	
  Development	
  Co. 5.8 0.45 1.44 25.85
34045202340000 20234 636 Fairfield Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) C.	
  A.	
  Davis	
  Drg.	
  Contractor 5.95 0.44 3.03 29.01
34045617000000 61700 2740 Fairfield ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.83
34045617000000 61700 2740 Fairfield Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Phillips	
  Pet	
  Co. 4.92 0.41 0.52 17.96
34049600040000 60004 859 Franklin Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Andrix 7.32 0.44 2.04 36.31 1.5
34051600250000 60025 2744 Fulton ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.7
34051600280000 60028 2747 Fulton ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.72
34051600290000 60029 2748 Fulton ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 9.65
34053204740000 20474 2874 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Mitchell	
  Energy	
  Corp. 9.65 0.51
34053204770000 20477 2871 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Mitchell	
  Energy	
  Corp. 9.53 0.61
34053204770000 20477 2871 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Mitchell	
  Energy	
  Corp. 7.7 0.54 4.74 39.68
34053204770000 20477 2871 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Mitchell	
  Energy	
  Corp. 7.68 0.61 3.38 38.71
34053204780000 20478 2875 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Mitchell	
  Energy	
  Corp. 9.55 0.59
34053204790000 20479 2872 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Mitchell	
  Energy	
  Corp. 9.05 0.55
34053204800000 20480 3557 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Energy	
  Search	
  Inc. 4 0.72 1.37 18.93
34053204820000 20482 2873 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Mitchell	
  Energy	
  Corp. 11.79 0.64
34053204820000 20482 2873 Gallia Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Mitchell	
  Energy	
  Corp. 2.49 0.47 0.46 7.59
34053207690000 20769 3654 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Elgin	
  Service	
  Center	
  Inc. 3.92 0.78 1.64 20.02
34053207690000 20769 3654 Gallia Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Elgin	
  Service	
  Center	
  Inc. 2.46 1.33 9.36
34053209970000 20997 3695 Gallia ODGS	
  core	
  records Continental	
  Resources	
  Inc. 11.3 0.796 5.63 73.74
34055200020000 20002 193 Geauga ODGS	
  core	
  records Benedum	
  Trees	
  Oil	
  Co. 4.77 0.95 15.55
34055200200000 20020 2392 Geauga ODGS	
  core	
  records Twm	
  Petrolwum	
  Inc. 7.11 1.14 19.13
34059207990000 20799 7 Guernsey Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Well	
  Supervision	
  Inc. 2.92 0.45 0.69 7.47
34059223890000 22389 3703 Guernsey Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Kenoil 1.1 0.62 2.07
34059226450000 22645 3763 Guernsey ODGS	
  core	
  records Eastland	
  Energy	
  Group	
  Inc. 4.35 0.72 1.96 11.36
34059227340000 22734 3868 Guernsey Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Artex	
  Oil	
  Company 3.59 2.2 12.81
34067201030000 20103 2287 Harrison Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Moore	
  Jerry	
  Inc. 0.8 0.35 0.79
34067201040000 20104 2389 Harrison ODGS	
  core	
  records Amerada	
  Hess	
  Corp. 2.85 1.05 6.08
34067203450000 20345 3709 Harrison ODGS	
  core	
  records Sound	
  Energy	
  Co.	
  Inc. 0.88
34067203550000 20355 3735 Harrison ODGS	
  core	
  records Exco	
  -­‐	
  North	
  Coast	
  Energy	
  Inc. 3.62 1.28 2.22 5.25
34069600740000 60074 2749 Henry ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.74
34069600760000 60076 2751 Henry ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.95
34069600780000 60078 2753 Henry ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.22
TABLE A-1. List of wells and data used for mapping source rock potential and thermal maturity in eastern Ohio.
APPENDIX
19
API	
  NO. PERM	
  NO. CORE	
  # CUTTING	
  #
COUNTY	
  
NAME
SOURCE	
  OF	
  DATA COMPANY	
  NAME
MAX	
  
TOC	
  (%)
MAX	
  
%RO	
  
MAX	
  S1	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
(mg	
  HC/g	
  
of	
  rock)
MAX	
  S2	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
(mg	
  HC/g	
  of	
  
rock)
MAX	
  
CAI
34073204970000 20497 679 Hocking Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Barton	
  A.	
  Holl 5.22 0.39 2.51 25.91
34073206110000 20611 738 Hocking Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Kewanee	
  Oil	
  Co. 1+
34075207290000 20729 662 Holmes ODGS	
  core	
  records Pan-­‐Ohio	
  Oil	
  &	
  Gas	
  Co. 5.07 0.94 18.87
34075214090000 21409 2412 Holmes ODGS	
  core	
  records Pin	
  Oak	
  Petroleum	
  Inc. 7.73 2.25 44.4
34075216090000 21609 2911 Holmes ODGS	
  core	
  records Raber,	
  Aden	
  B. 3.97 2.88 14.12
34077200700000 20070 1980 Huron Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Glynn	
  Trolz	
  &	
  Assoc.	
  Inc. 3.92 0.75 19.27
34077201440000 20144 2823 Huron Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) D.	
  L.	
  Woody	
  Inc. 1+
34077600240000 60024 2757 Huron ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.3
34079201020000 20102 3465 Jackson ODGS	
  core	
  records Artex	
  Oil	
  Company 8.19 0.72 2.17 44.34
34079201680000 20168 NA NA Jackson ODGS	
  core	
  records Cgas	
  Exploration 8 0.51 8.06 41.98
34081203400000 20340 1060 Jefferson ODGS	
  core	
  records Lake	
  Shore	
  Pipeline	
  Co. 4.3 1.98 4.25
34081204120000 20412 3747 Jefferson ODGS	
  core	
  records Exco	
  -­‐	
  North	
  Coast	
  Energy	
  Inc. 3.35 1.34 1.55 2.88
34081204120000 20412 3747 Jefferson Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Exco	
  -­‐	
  North	
  Coast	
  Energy	
  Inc. 0.87 0.33 0.7
34083225990000 22599 2900 Knox ODGS	
  core	
  records Maram	
  Energy	
  Co. 7.63 0.76
34083225990000 22599 2900 Knox Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Maram	
  Energy	
  Co. 7.2 0.63 4.74 39.13 1+
34085200170000 20017 855 Lake Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Morton	
  Salt	
  Co. 6.67 0.46 4.61 31.7 1.5
34085201420000 20142 2509 Lake Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Ici	
  Americas	
  Inc. 2.7 1.33 8.86
34085202210000 20221 3453 Lake ODGS	
  core	
  records Lubrizol	
  Corp. 1.47
34087202570000 20257 3609 Lawrence Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Petro	
  Quest	
  Inc. 2.29 1 7.27
34087202580000 20258 3721 Lawrence ODGS	
  core	
  records Petro	
  Quest	
  Inc. 4.93 0.69 2.62 24.16
34089233410000 23341 3755 Licking ODGS	
  core	
  records Brown	
  Phillip	
  H.	
  Jr.	
  Corporation 8.79 0.67 2.82 31.52
34089234990000 23499 3707 Licking ODGS	
  core	
  records Enervest	
  Operating	
  Llc. 6.64 0.59 3.31 20.74
34093211000000 21100 2909 Lorain ODGS	
  core	
  records Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 11.66 0.75
34093211000000 21100 2909 Lorain Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 5.66 0.36 2.74 24.14
34093605050000 60505 2762 Lorain ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 8.56
34093605060000 60506 2763 Lorain ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 8.46
34099200200000 20020 63 Mahoning ODGS	
  core	
  records Magnolia	
  Petroleum 4.43 1.09 9.87
34099201790000 20179 1016 Mahoning ODGS	
  core	
  records Bocor	
  Holdings,	
  Llc/Bocor	
  Prod. 3.73 1.43 13.83
34099211890000 21189 3748 Mahoning Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data H	
  &	
  W	
  Energy 2.68 0.97 8.23
34101600290000 60029 2766 Marion	
   ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.09
34101600310000 60031 2768 Marion	
   ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 14.01
34103211430000 21143 819 Medina Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Bocor	
  Holdings,	
  Llc/Bocor	
  Prod. 3 1.51 8.46
34105213130000 21313 827 Meigs ODGS	
  core	
  records The	
  Ohio	
  Fuel	
  Gas	
  Co. 4.94 0.79 1.77 18.15
34105214220000 21422 2249 Meigs ODGS	
  core	
  records Jadoil	
  Inc.	
  D.	
  Vernau 1.48
34105220580000 22058 2921 Meigs ODGS	
  core	
  records Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 6.34 0.78 3.95 27.28
34105220580000 22058 2921 Meigs ODGS	
  core	
  records Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 2.88 0.59 0.35 11.15
34105220580000 22058 2921 Meigs ODGS	
  core	
  records Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 5.7 0.73
34105220580000 22058 2921 Meigs Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 5.52 0.48 4.34 21.68
34105224990000 22499 2922 Meigs Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 0.57 0.97 0.84
34111203450000 20345 NA NA Monroe ODGS	
  core	
  records Miley	
  Gas	
  Company 2.21 1.33 5.51
34111218810000 21881 3714 Monroe ODGS	
  core	
  records Buckeye	
  Oil	
  Producing	
  Co. 1.53 0.82 0.44 1.33
34115217720000 21772 3731 Morgan ODGS	
  core	
  records Inland	
  Drilling	
  Co	
  Inc. 4.05 0.62 2.14 14.85
34115217720000 21772 3731 Morgan Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Inland	
  Drilling	
  Co	
  Inc. 2.39 1.07 6.06
34115235700000 23570 3848 Morgan Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Hanna	
  M.	
  A.	
  Co. 1.25 0.64 2.59
34115237590000 23759 4964 Morgan ODGS	
  core	
  records Smith	
  Ronald	
  Dba	
  Chipco 1.64 0.37 2.82
34117600380000 60038 2769 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.81
34117600390000 60039 2770 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.11
34117600390000 60037 2770 Morrow Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Phillips	
  Pet	
  Co. 9.92 0.43 4.41 55.69 1+
34117600410000 60041 2772 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.18
34117600420000 60042 2773 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 14.25
34117600430000 60043 2775 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.42
34117600440000 60044 2776 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.35
34117600450000 60045 2777 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 14.37
34117600460000 60046 2778 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.81
34117600480000 60048 2780 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.33
34117600540000 60054 2786 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.18
34117600550000 60055 2787 Morrow ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.47
34119201460000 20146 65 Muskingum ODGS	
  core	
  records E.	
  M.	
  Shields 4.42 0.53 11.56
34119216170000 21617 799 Muskingum Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Barco	
  Corporation 4.02 0.43 2.18 18.4
34119219500000 21950 2128 Muskingum ODGS	
  core	
  records Sidwell,	
  Cris	
  D. 3.68 0.96 20.85
34119252500000 25250 3767 Muskingum ODGS	
  core	
  records Cgas	
  Exploration 5.64 0.55 2.34 20.41
34119252500000 25250 3767 Muskingum Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Cgas	
  Exploration 3.64 1.3 18.05
34121206580000 20658 385 Noble ODGS	
  core	
  records H.	
  Rey.	
  Halvenston 9 2.36 11.79
34121213120000 21312 2292 Noble ODGS	
  core	
  records Waite,	
  James	
  D. 3.02 0.79 5.57
34121221000000 22100 3723 Noble Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Zilkha	
  Energy	
  Inc. 1.24 0.42 1.6
34121221130000 22113 3734 Noble ODGS	
  core	
  records Green	
  Gas	
  Co 3.64 0.98 2.21 9.27
34121222550000 22255 2936 Noble ODGS	
  core	
  records Stonebridge	
  Operating	
  Co. 12.63 1.16 6.51 28.65
34121222550000 22255 2936 Noble ODGS	
  core	
  records Stonebridge	
  Operating	
  Co. 11.35
34121222550000 22255 2936 Noble Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Stonebridge	
  Operating	
  Co. 7.03 1.01 4.5 17.72 1+
34127223800000 22380 1573 Perry Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Kentucky	
  Drilling	
  &	
  Operating	
  Corp. 4.56 0.46 2.21 22.34
34127228550000 22855 2290 Perry Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Kentucky	
  Drlg.	
  &	
  Operating	
  Corp. 1.5
34129600030000 60003 2788 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.38
34129600030000 60003 2788 Pickaway Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Phillips	
  Pet	
  Co. 10.54 0.42 2.05 43.56
34129600050000 60005 2790 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 8.86
34129600060000 60006 2791 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.92
34129600070000 60007 2792 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.88
34129600080000 60008 2794 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 9.95
34129600090000 60009 2796 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.08
34129600100000 60010 2797 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.06
34129600110000 60011 2799 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.87
34129600120000 60012 2800 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 11.21
34129600130000 60013 2801 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.63
34129600140000 60014 2802 Pickaway ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 10.8
20
API	
  NO. PERM	
  NO. CORE	
  # CUTTING	
  #
COUNTY	
  
NAME
SOURCE	
  OF	
  DATA COMPANY	
  NAME
MAX	
  
TOC	
  (%)
MAX	
  
%RO	
  
MAX	
  S1	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
(mg	
  HC/g	
  
of	
  rock)
MAX	
  S2	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
(mg	
  HC/g	
  of	
  
rock)
MAX	
  
CAI
34131200220000 20022 2946 Pike	
   Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Karl	
  Wehmeyer	
  &	
  Co. 1+
34131600600000 60060 2803 Pike	
   ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 18.26
34131600610000 60061 2804 Pike	
   ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 12.62
34131600610000 60061 2804 Pike	
   Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Phillips	
  Pet	
  Co. 7.2 0.42 1.71 34.4
34131600620000 60062 2805 Pike	
   ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.3
34131600630000 60063 2806 Pike	
   ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.77
34133200020000 20002 242 Portage ODGS	
  core	
  records J.	
  W.	
  Cashdollar 5.37 1.96 20.74
34133205180000 20518 3092 Portage ODGS	
  core	
  records Enervest	
  Operating	
  Llc. 5.19 2.37 21.22
34139205230000 20523 2949 Richland Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Fry,	
  Andrew	
  M. 7.27 0.43 1.94 33.39
34139205270000 20527 2955 Richland Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Bates,	
  Lew	
  Jr. 8.08 0.43 5.23 41.17
34141600060000 60006 562 Ross Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) OSU	
  Engineering 4.43 0.4 1.2 20.96
34141600250000 60025 2807 Ross ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 14.23
34141600260000 60026 2808 Ross ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.57
34145201930000 20193 2959 Scioto ODGS	
  core	
  records Continental	
  Oil	
  Co. 8.28 0.57 1.98 29.31
34145202120000 20212 2161 Scioto ODGS	
  core	
  records Aristech	
  Chemical	
  Corp. 6.07 0.7 1.81 30.38
34145601410000 60141 3409 Scioto Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Aristech	
  Chemical	
  Corp. 8.64 4.93 55.89
34145601450000 60145 2813 Scioto ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 21.08
34145601460000 60146 2814 Scioto ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 16.58
34145601460000 60146 2814 Scioto Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Phillips	
  Pet	
  Co. 9.57 0.33 4.03 51.04
34145601470000 60147 2815 Scioto ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.55
34145601490000 60149 2816 Scioto ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 14.15
34145601530000 60153 2817 Scioto ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 13.46
34145601540000 60154 2818 Scioto ODGS	
  core	
  records N.	
  American	
  Exploration,	
  Inc. 14.41
34151228270000 22827 3704 Stark Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Miller,	
  William	
  S.	
  Inc. 1.9 0.79 5.03
34153604170000 60417 510 Summit Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Pittsburgh	
  Plate	
  Glass	
  Co.	
  Columbia	
  Chem.	
  Div. 9.21 0.48 4.76 39.42 1.5
34155212380000 21238 2962 Trumbull Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Columbia	
  Gas	
  Transmission 8.44 0.42 5.67 37.02 1.5
34157200040000 20004 41 Tuscarawas ODGS	
  core	
  records O.	
  F.	
  G. 3.6 1.15 10.34
34157200660000 20066 209 Tuscarawas Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Brendel	
  Prod.	
  Co. 2.58 0.44 0.85 8.93
34157201010000 20101 308 Tuscarawas ODGS	
  core	
  records Columbian	
  Carbon	
  Co. 1.77 0.43 6.56
34157207880000 20788 820 Tuscarawas ODGS	
  core	
  records Dr.	
  Thos.	
  Christopher 5.33 1.65 15.88
34157210360000 21036 2071 Tuscarawas ODGS	
  core	
  records Eclipse	
  Resources-­‐Ohio	
  Llc. 2.57 0.8 7.48
34157211610000 21161 2337 Tuscarawas ODGS	
  core	
  records Tipka	
  Energy	
  Devlopment	
  Co. 2.42 1.11 8.87
34157216610000 21661 2810 Tuscarawas ODGS	
  core	
  records Welling	
  John 3.44 1.14 12.27
34157233200000 23320 3733 Tuscarawas Unpublished	
  USGS	
  data Enervest	
  Operating	
  Llc. 1.13 0.37 2.11
34163203310000 20331 2015 Vinton ODGS	
  core	
  records Doyle	
  Baird 5.32 1.32 26.1
34163203690000 20369 2508 Vinton ODGS	
  core	
  records Quaker	
  State	
  Oil	
  Ref	
  Corp. 6.93 0.62 1.81 30.04
34163205570000 20557 NA NA Vinton ODGS	
  core	
  records Donald	
  Byers	
  Oil	
  &	
  Gas	
  Llc. 9.92 0.48 4.45 67.91
34163206190000 20619 NA NA Vinton ODGS	
  core	
  records Donald	
  Byers	
  Oil	
  &	
  Gas	
  Llc. 12.65 0.46 5.9 65.26
34163206540000 20654 NA NA Vinton ODGS	
  core	
  records Trainer,	
  Everett	
  C. 18.37 0.49 7.35 115.04
34167203030000 20303 481 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records Columbian	
  Carbon	
  Co.	
  &	
  Joe	
  Rubin 4.7 1.66 9.28
34167215150000 21515 506 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records Ohio	
  Fuel	
  Gas	
  Co. 6.08 2.02 12.09
34167216980000 21698 2734 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records B.H.	
  Putnam 2.39 1.12 5.91
34167217000000 21700 2732 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records B.H.	
  Putnam 5.98 2.39 13.56
34167231000000 23100 2382 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records Amerada	
  Petroleum	
  Corp. 3.55 0.81 4.08
34167233060000 23306 2500 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records Whipple	
  Run	
  Oil	
  &	
  Gas	
  Co. 2.54 1.38 4.3
34167235210000 23521 2966 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records Indian	
  Hills	
  Resources	
  Llc. 4.85 0.868 3.05 14.56
34167235210000 23521 2966 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records Indian	
  Hills	
  Resources	
  Llc. 2.71 0.77 2.2 6.75
34167235210000 23521 2966 Washington Repetski	
  and	
  others	
  (2008) Indian	
  Hills	
  Resources	
  Llc. 2.93 0.92 2.44 11.09
34167252410000 25241 3760 Washington ODGS	
  core	
  records Triad	
  Hunter	
  	
  Llc. 3.86 1.06 2.32 5.79
34169215640000 21564 2252 Wayne ODGS	
  core	
  records Wenner	
  Petroleum	
  Corp. 1.66 0.33 3.7
Ohio Department of Natural Resources
Division of Geological Survey
2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-1
Columbus, OH 43229-6693
Telephone: (614) 265-6595
Fax: (614) 447-1918
3404120123
CLIFTON LEWIS
PAUL EVART
TD=3231 ft
985 m
13.6 mi
21.8 km 3408921981
LAKE SHORE PIPELINE
GRANVILLE S. & H.M.DROKE
TD=4505 ft
1373 m
20.6 mi
33.1 km 3408922581
HUNTING OIL CO.
DOYLE WOLFORD
TD=2990 ft
911 m
29.3 mi
47.2 km 3411926771
RPJ ENERGY FUND MGMT.INC.
SMITH
TD=4771 ft
1454 m
11.3 mi
18.2 km 3412123096
CAVENDISH PETRO.OF OH.INC
OHIO POWER CO.
TD=5541 ft
1689 m
4.1 mi
6.6 km 3412121744
CARTER-JONES LUMBER CO.
DON E. PARRISH
TD=5779 ft
1761 m
7.1 mi
11.4 km 3412123199
BENATTY CORP.
OHIO POWER CO.
TD=6221 ft
1896 m
10.7 mi
17.2 km 3416725241
ARAPAHO VENTURES OF NY INC
DAVID L. REYNOLDS
TD=6678 ft
2035 m
14.4 mi
23.2 km 4707300667
COMMONWEALTH NATURAL
KERNS 1
TD=6862 ft
2092 m
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
NEUT
0 8000NAPI
100
200
300
400
500
600
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
NEUT
0 4000
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
RHOB
2.000 3.000G/C3
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
NPHI
0.3 -0.1V/V
RHOB
2.000 3.000G/C3
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
NPHI
0.3 -0.1V/V
RHOB
2.000 3.000G/C3
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
NPHI
0.3 -0.1V/V
DPHI
0.3 -0.1V/V
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
NPHI
0.3 -0.1V/V
RHOB
2.000 3.000G/C3
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
NPHI
30 - 10none
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
Correlation
GR
0 200GAPI
Depth
TVD
Porosity
NEUT
0 1200NAPI
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
2900
3000
3100
3200
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4400
4500
Cleveland Sh Mbr
Bedford Sh
upper Huron Sh Mbr
Chagrin Sh Mbr
middle Huron Sh Mbr
lower Huron Sh Mbr
Ohio
Sh
Hanover Sh Mbr
Angola Sh Mbr
Onondaga Ls
Pipe Creek Sh Mbr
Hamilton Gp
Marcellus Sh
Sunbury Sh
Berea Ss
Upper Devonian und
Chagrin Sh Mbr
lower Huron Sh Mbr
Hanover Sh Mbr
Pipe Creek Sh Mbr
Angola Sh Mbr
Rhinestreet Sh Mbr
Rhinestreet Sh Mbr
Cashaqua Sh Mbr
Middlesex Sh Mbr
Geneseo Sh Mbr
Marcellus Sh
Onondaga Ls
Geologic Unit
Java Fm
W est Falls Fm
System/
Series
UPPERDEVONIAN
MIDDLE
DEVONIAN
Geologic Unit
Ohio Sh
Java Fm
West Falls Fm
Sonyea Fm
Genesee Fm
System/
Series
???
Hamilton Gp
West River Sh Mbr
WVOH
Location of cross section line and Ohio Shale outcrop.
Angola Sh Mbr
Hanover Sh
M
br
low
er Huron
Sh
M
br
BedfordSh
SunburySh
upper
Huron
Sh
M
br
Cleveland
Sh
M
br
BereaSs
Cuyahoga Fm
m
iddle
Huron
Sh
M
br
A A'
Unit abbreviations: Fm = Formation, Gp = Group, Ls = Limestone, Mbr = Member, Sh = Shale, Ss = Sandstone, und= undifferentiated.
MISSISS-
IPPIAN
UPPER
DEVONIAN
MIDDLE
DEVONIAN
Lawrence
Adams
Pike Meigs
Jackson
Brown
Clermont Highland
Vinton
Ross Athens
Warren
Hocking
Morgan
Pickaway Monroe
Perry
Montgomery
Preble
Madison
Muskingum
Belmont
Guernsey
ChampaignDarke
Harrison
Shelby
Logan
Knox Tuscarawas
Auglaize MorrowMercer
Hardin
WayneWyandot
Ashland
Lorain
Mahoning
Hancock
Putnam
SenecaPaulding
Van Wert
Allen
Medina
Huron
Summit
Trumbull
Portage
ErieHenry SanduskyWood Cuyahoga
Geauga
Fulton Lucas Lake
Ottowa
Williams
Defiance
Miami
Union
Clark
Butler
Greene
Clinton
Fayette
Hamilton
Gallia
Scioto
Fairfield
Licking
Coshocton
Holmes
Marion
Delaware
Franklin
Richland Stark
Washinton
Noble
Jefferson
Carroll
Columbiana
Ashtabula
M I L A K E
E R I E
PA
A
A'
W
V
IN
K Y
0
4300
PLATE 1. Regional stratigraphic cross section illustrating the Middle and Upper Devonian interval from Delaware County, Ohio, to Pleasants County, West Virginia.

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources Report on Potential for Drilling in Devonian Shale

USGS Study of Marcellus Shale Wastewater Radioactivity Levels
USGS Study of Marcellus Shale Wastewater Radioactivity LevelsUSGS Study of Marcellus Shale Wastewater Radioactivity Levels
USGS Study of Marcellus Shale Wastewater Radioactivity LevelsMarcellus Drilling News
 
Geology and Activity Update of the Ohio Utica-Point Pleasant Play
Geology and Activity Update of the Ohio Utica-Point Pleasant PlayGeology and Activity Update of the Ohio Utica-Point Pleasant Play
Geology and Activity Update of the Ohio Utica-Point Pleasant PlayMarcellus Drilling News
 
News Release: Numerous Drill Targets Identified on Gibbons Creek Uranium Pro...
News Release:  Numerous Drill Targets Identified on Gibbons Creek Uranium Pro...News Release:  Numerous Drill Targets Identified on Gibbons Creek Uranium Pro...
News Release: Numerous Drill Targets Identified on Gibbons Creek Uranium Pro...Lakeland Resources Inc. (TSXv: LK)
 
Molofsky_etal._2013_Groundwater
Molofsky_etal._2013_GroundwaterMolofsky_etal._2013_Groundwater
Molofsky_etal._2013_GroundwaterLisa Molofsky
 
Study: Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern Pennsylvania
Study: Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern PennsylvaniaStudy: Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern Pennsylvania
Study: Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern PennsylvaniaMarcellus Drilling News
 
Tip & Glow Radioactive Waste Amendment in the State Budget Bill Webinar
Tip & Glow Radioactive Waste Amendment in the State Budget Bill WebinarTip & Glow Radioactive Waste Amendment in the State Budget Bill Webinar
Tip & Glow Radioactive Waste Amendment in the State Budget Bill WebinarOhio Environmental Council
 
Kliffi Blackstone_ENVS601_Report_Final_12.16.16
Kliffi Blackstone_ENVS601_Report_Final_12.16.16Kliffi Blackstone_ENVS601_Report_Final_12.16.16
Kliffi Blackstone_ENVS601_Report_Final_12.16.16Kliffi Blackstone
 
Chen Box Model Study 2013-2014
Chen Box Model Study 2013-2014 Chen Box Model Study 2013-2014
Chen Box Model Study 2013-2014 Alex Chen
 
Poster_Housela_Updated_10_26
Poster_Housela_Updated_10_26Poster_Housela_Updated_10_26
Poster_Housela_Updated_10_26Lindsay House
 
AlecLeeSeniorThesis
AlecLeeSeniorThesisAlecLeeSeniorThesis
AlecLeeSeniorThesisAlec Lee
 
Wong, 2011 (B.Sc.G.Sc.Hons.Thesis-Final).compressed
Wong, 2011 (B.Sc.G.Sc.Hons.Thesis-Final).compressedWong, 2011 (B.Sc.G.Sc.Hons.Thesis-Final).compressed
Wong, 2011 (B.Sc.G.Sc.Hons.Thesis-Final).compressedMay Vogan (Wong)
 
58 S C I E N T I F I C A M E R I C A N M A R C H 2 0 0 6.docx
58 S C I E N T I F I C  A M E R I C A N  M A R C H  2 0 0 6.docx58 S C I E N T I F I C  A M E R I C A N  M A R C H  2 0 0 6.docx
58 S C I E N T I F I C A M E R I C A N M A R C H 2 0 0 6.docxtroutmanboris
 

Similar a Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources Report on Potential for Drilling in Devonian Shale (20)

USGS Study of Marcellus Shale Wastewater Radioactivity Levels
USGS Study of Marcellus Shale Wastewater Radioactivity LevelsUSGS Study of Marcellus Shale Wastewater Radioactivity Levels
USGS Study of Marcellus Shale Wastewater Radioactivity Levels
 
NW - B.Sc. Thesis
NW - B.Sc. ThesisNW - B.Sc. Thesis
NW - B.Sc. Thesis
 
Utica shale presentation_cwc2011
Utica shale presentation_cwc2011Utica shale presentation_cwc2011
Utica shale presentation_cwc2011
 
of_7948
of_7948of_7948
of_7948
 
Geology and Activity Update of the Ohio Utica-Point Pleasant Play
Geology and Activity Update of the Ohio Utica-Point Pleasant PlayGeology and Activity Update of the Ohio Utica-Point Pleasant Play
Geology and Activity Update of the Ohio Utica-Point Pleasant Play
 
News Release: Numerous Drill Targets Identified on Gibbons Creek Uranium Pro...
News Release:  Numerous Drill Targets Identified on Gibbons Creek Uranium Pro...News Release:  Numerous Drill Targets Identified on Gibbons Creek Uranium Pro...
News Release: Numerous Drill Targets Identified on Gibbons Creek Uranium Pro...
 
Molofsky_etal._2013_Groundwater
Molofsky_etal._2013_GroundwaterMolofsky_etal._2013_Groundwater
Molofsky_etal._2013_Groundwater
 
Study: Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern Pennsylvania
Study: Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern PennsylvaniaStudy: Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern Pennsylvania
Study: Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern Pennsylvania
 
Arctic change 2017
Arctic change 2017Arctic change 2017
Arctic change 2017
 
Se ohio
Se ohioSe ohio
Se ohio
 
Tip & Glow Radioactive Waste Amendment in the State Budget Bill Webinar
Tip & Glow Radioactive Waste Amendment in the State Budget Bill WebinarTip & Glow Radioactive Waste Amendment in the State Budget Bill Webinar
Tip & Glow Radioactive Waste Amendment in the State Budget Bill Webinar
 
Kliffi Blackstone_ENVS601_Report_Final_12.16.16
Kliffi Blackstone_ENVS601_Report_Final_12.16.16Kliffi Blackstone_ENVS601_Report_Final_12.16.16
Kliffi Blackstone_ENVS601_Report_Final_12.16.16
 
Chen Box Model Study 2013-2014
Chen Box Model Study 2013-2014 Chen Box Model Study 2013-2014
Chen Box Model Study 2013-2014
 
Moritz-_Methane_baseline
Moritz-_Methane_baselineMoritz-_Methane_baseline
Moritz-_Methane_baseline
 
Poster_Housela_Updated_10_26
Poster_Housela_Updated_10_26Poster_Housela_Updated_10_26
Poster_Housela_Updated_10_26
 
AlecLeeSeniorThesis
AlecLeeSeniorThesisAlecLeeSeniorThesis
AlecLeeSeniorThesis
 
Joel Poster 2_2
Joel Poster 2_2Joel Poster 2_2
Joel Poster 2_2
 
Wong, 2011 (B.Sc.G.Sc.Hons.Thesis-Final).compressed
Wong, 2011 (B.Sc.G.Sc.Hons.Thesis-Final).compressedWong, 2011 (B.Sc.G.Sc.Hons.Thesis-Final).compressed
Wong, 2011 (B.Sc.G.Sc.Hons.Thesis-Final).compressed
 
of_7056
of_7056of_7056
of_7056
 
58 S C I E N T I F I C A M E R I C A N M A R C H 2 0 0 6.docx
58 S C I E N T I F I C  A M E R I C A N  M A R C H  2 0 0 6.docx58 S C I E N T I F I C  A M E R I C A N  M A R C H  2 0 0 6.docx
58 S C I E N T I F I C A M E R I C A N M A R C H 2 0 0 6.docx
 

Más de Marcellus Drilling News

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongMarcellus Drilling News
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Marcellus Drilling News
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateMarcellus Drilling News
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateMarcellus Drilling News
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesMarcellus Drilling News
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingMarcellus Drilling News
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesMarcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015Marcellus Drilling News
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsMarcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsMarcellus Drilling News
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookMarcellus Drilling News
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideMarcellus Drilling News
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditMarcellus Drilling News
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportMarcellus Drilling News
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectMarcellus Drilling News
 

Más de Marcellus Drilling News (20)

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
 

Último

Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's DevelopmentNara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Developmentnarsireddynannuri1
 
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceEnjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfHow Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfLorenzo Lemes
 
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptxMinto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptxAwaiskhalid96
 
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdhEmbed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdhbhavenpr
 
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Pooja Nehwal
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopkoEmbed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopkobhavenpr
 
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceEnjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 
1971 war india pakistan bangladesh liberation.ppt
1971 war india pakistan bangladesh liberation.ppt1971 war india pakistan bangladesh liberation.ppt
1971 war india pakistan bangladesh liberation.pptsammehtumblr
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceDelhi Call girls
 
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书Fi L
 
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreie
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreieGujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreie
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreiebhavenpr
 
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docxkfjstone13
 
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docxkfjstone13
 
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s LeadershipTDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadershipanjanibaddipudi1
 
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)Delhi Call girls
 
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 

Último (20)

Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's DevelopmentNara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
 
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceEnjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfHow Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
 
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptxMinto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
 
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdhEmbed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
Embed-4.pdf lkdiinlajeklhndklheduhuekjdh
 
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopkoEmbed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
 
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceEnjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Iffco Chowk Gurgaon >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
1971 war india pakistan bangladesh liberation.ppt
1971 war india pakistan bangladesh liberation.ppt1971 war india pakistan bangladesh liberation.ppt
1971 war india pakistan bangladesh liberation.ppt
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
 
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreie
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreieGujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreie
Gujarat-SEBCs.pdf pfpkoopapriorjfperjreie
 
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
 
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
 
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s LeadershipTDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
 
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
 
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
28042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 

Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources Report on Potential for Drilling in Devonian Shale

  • 1. Open-File Report 2016-3 Columbus 2016 Mapping Source Rock and Thermal Maturity of the Devonian Shale Interval in Eastern Ohio by Ronald A. Riley
  • 2. DISCLAIMER The information contained herein has not been reviewed for technical accuracy and conformity with the current Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), Division of Geological Survey standards for published or open-file materials. The ODNR Division of Geological Survey does not guarantee this information to be free from errors, omissions, or inaccuracies and disclaims any responsibility or liability for interpretations or deci- sions based thereon. Cover image: Ohio Shale exposure at Copperas Mountain in Ross County, Ohio. Recommended bibliographic citation: Riley, R.A., 2016, Mapping source rock and thermal maturity of the De- vonian shale interval in eastern Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016-3, 22 p.
  • 3. i CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 Source rock geochemistry terms and definitions......................................................................................2 Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters and definitions..................................................................................2 Thermal maturity measurements and definitions................................................................................2 Previous work...........................................................................................................................................3 Methodology.............................................................................................................................................4 Regional stratigraphic and structural setting................................................................................................5 Discussion................................................................................................................................................6 Source rock geochemistry.......................................................................................................................6 Source rock potential maps...............................................................................................................6 Thermal maturity maps.................................................................................................................. 11 Conclusions............................................................................................................................................ 11 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................................15 References cited......................................................................................................................................15 Appendix................................................................................................................................................18 FIGURES 1. Sampled wells used for source rock mapping of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.....................4 2. Typical well log from Licking County, Ohio, showing stratigraphic nomenclature for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.................................................................................................5 3. Map of interval thickness of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio..................................................7 4. Structure map on top of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio........................................................8 5. Isopleth map of the maximum total organic carbon (TOC) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.........................................................................................................................................9 6. Isopleth map of the maximum S1 (existing hydrocarbons) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio....................................................................................................................................... 10 7. Isopleth map of the maximum S2 (hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio...............................................................................................12 8. Isograd map of the maximum vitrinite reflectance (%Ro ) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.......................................................................................................................................13 9. Isograd map of the conodont alteration index (CAI) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio........14 TABLES 1. Measured geochemical parameters describing source rock generative potential from TOC, S1 , S2 , and S1 + S2 ................................................................................................................2 2. Thermal maturity parameters describing types of hydrocarbon generated from Tmax , PI, %Ro , and CAI...................................................................................................................3 A-1. List of wells and data used for mapping source rock potential and thermal maturity in eastern Ohio...................................................................................................................................18 PLATE 1. Regional stratigraphic cross section illustrating the Middle and Upper Devonian interval from Delaware County, Ohio, to Pleasants County, West Virginia.................................................................................22
  • 4. ii ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT Units of Measure Foot/feet.................................................. ft Gram(s)....................................................g Kilometer(s)...........................................km Meter(s).................................................. m Mile(s)....................................................mi Milligram(s)...........................................mg Other Eastern Gas Shales Project................... EGSP Gas Research Institute............................GRI Hydrocarbons.........................................HC Total organic carbon ............................TOC U.S. Department of Energy....................DOE U.S. Geological Survey........................ USGS
  • 5. 1 ABSTRACT The stratigraphic interval for this investigation extends from the top of the Middle Devonian Onondaga Lime- stone to the base of the Upper Devonian Berea Sandstone. Devonian shale source rock geochemistry and ther- mal maturity data were compiled from all available published sources and from archived data for 201 wells in eastern and central Ohio. From this comprehensive database, maps of total organic carbon (TOC), existing hydrocarbons (S1 ), hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis (S2 ), vitrinite reflectance (%Ro ), and conodont al- teration index (CAI) were constructed to better refine the source rock generative potential and thermal maturity of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Generally, westward increases in TOC, S1 , and S2 were evident from these preliminary maps. Maximum TOC values per well ranged from 0.5 to 18.4 percent with over 70 per- cent of the wells having values greater than 4 percent, which is considered excellent source rock potential. The maximum value of TOC for the Devonian shale was over twice that of the Upper Ordovician Utica-Point Pleas- ant interval in eastern Ohio. The maximum S1 value was 8.6 milligrams of hydrocarbons per gram (mg HC/g) of rock (excellent source rock generative potential) and generally ranged from 1 to 2 mg HC/g of rock (good source rock generative potential). Maximum S2 values were often in the range of 10–20 (very good) or 20–40 (excel- lent) mg HC/g rock. Thermal maturity maps using %Ro and CAI revealed a basinward (eastward) transition to more thermally mature rocks. Maximum vitrinite reflectance values ranged from 0.33 to 1.34 %Ro . A 0.6 %Ro isograd trends northeast–southwest through eastern Ohio, marks the onset of oil generation, and separates the immature region to the west. The oil window transitions eastward to a condensate or wet gas window at values between 1.1 and 1.4 %Ro . “Vitrinite suppression” was indicated by both a comparison with %Ro of the overly- ing coals and with reported historic production. While current Devonian shale horizontal drilling is focused on the Marcellus Shale, these maps and data present strong evidence that other organic-rich Devonian shale units, such as the overlying Huron Shale Member and Rhinestreet Shale Member, also have significant oil and gas potential and may be good candidates for modern-day horizontal drilling techniques. Mapping Source Rock and Thermal Maturity of the Devonian Shale Interval in Eastern Ohio by Ronald A. Riley INTRODUCTION The application of horizontal drilling combined with multistage hydraulic fracturing has resulted in a boom in drilling for unconventional gas and oil through- out the United States during the past decade. Since 2006, this technology has stimulated drilling activity and production from the Devonian Marcellus Shale in eastern Ohio and the Appalachian Basin and more recently, for other Devonian shale intervals such as the Rhinestreet Shale Member. The high potential for oil-and-gas production in these black, organic-rich shales has created an aggressive leasing-and-permit- ting program by many large independent and major oil companies in Ohio and the Appalachian Basin since the latter part of 2010. With this renewed interest in shale exploration, ad- ditional Devonian black shale well cuttings and core archived at the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey (Ohio Geological Sur- vey) core repository have been sampled and analyzed by oil-and-gas operators since 2011. Recent public domain data is extremely important to define target areas for Devonian shale exploration and to assist in updating and refining the resource assessment of the Devonian black shale interval. The data compilation and mapping project described herein are a result of the Ohio Geological Survey efforts to provide one com- prehensive database on Devonian shale source rock geochemistry and thermal maturity data to be used for evaluating and mapping the geographic limits of this important and prolific oil-and-gas play in eastern Ohio. Various studies on Devonian shale thermal maturity have been published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)from selected sample sets in Ohio and across the Appalachian Basin region. These investigations did not include archived data published in previous U.S. Department of Energy/Eastern Gas Shales Project (DOE/EGSP) and Gas Research Institute (GRI) studies during the 1970s and 1980s. In addition, source rock geochemistry and thermal maturity analyses on nu- merous Devonian shale cores and cuttings in storage
  • 6. 2 at the Ohio Geological Survey core repository recently have become public domain data. When combined with published geochemical data from previous DOE/ EGSP, GRI, and USGS studies, this recently acquired data has created a larger, more extensive data set to map and evaluate this regionally extensive Devonian shale unconventional target. Source Rock Geochemistry Terms and Definitions The following definitions and descriptions are pro- vided to aid in better understanding of basic source rock potential properties as they are discussed in this report. Total organic carbon (TOC) is a measurement in weight percent of the quantity of organic carbon preserved in a rock sample and includes both kerogen and bitumen (Peters and Cassa, 1994). Organic content is largely controlled during sedi- mentation by biologic productivity, sediment min- eralogy, and oxygenation of the water column and sediment. The TOC is a useful qualitative mea- sure of petroleum potential. A TOC of 0.5 percent generally is regarded as the minimum for defining a petroleum source rock, but most geochemists consider a TOC of greater than 1.0 percent as a good source rock for generating petroleum poten- tial (table 1). Kerogen is the portion of organic carbon particulate matter that is insoluble and remains after extrac- tion of organic solvents. It is derived from the breakdown of both marine and land-derived plant and animal matter. Bitumen is the portion of organic matter that is soluble in organic solvents. It is generally derived from the cracking (thermal disassociation) of the kerogen and to a lesser extent from lipid com- pounds from once-living organisms. In a broader, informal sense it refers to tar, pitch, and asphalt. Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters and definitions S1 values are a measurement (mg HC/g of rock) of the free hydrocarbons already generated that are volatilized out of the rock without cracking the kerogen. The hydrocarbons are distilled out of the rock sample at initial heating to a temperature of 350°C. These values may be anomalously high from migration and contamination by drilling flu- ids and mud. An S1 of greater than 1 is considered to be a good source rock (table 1). S2 is a measurement (mg HC/g of rock) of the amount of hydrocarbons generated through thermal cracking of kerogen and heavy hydrocar- bons. It represents the existing potential of a rock to generate hydrocarbons and is a more realistic measure of source rock potential than TOC, which includes “dead carbon” incapable of generating hydrocarbons. The S2 generally decreases with burial depths greater than 1 km. A S2 of greater than 5 is considered to have good source rock generative potential (table 1). Thermal maturity measurements and definitions Vitrinite reflectance (%Ro ) and conodont alteration index (CAI) are two of the primary indicators used to assess the thermal maturity of source rocks, and both were mapped for this project. Other evaluation methods for assessing thermal maturity include the hydrogen index (HI) and the production index (PI); both are derived from Rock-Eval pyrolysis measure- ments (Wallace and Roen, 1989; Peters and Cassa, 1994; McCarthy and others, 2011). The temperature (°C) of maximum release of hydrocarbons (Tmax ) is an- other Rock-Eval measurement used for determination of thermal maturity and is sometimes used in deeper, pre-Carboniferous geologic units where vitrinite is absent (Wallace and Roen, 1989; Peters and Cassa, 1994). Ryder and others (2013) provide a detailed dis- cussion of multiple parameters used for determining thermal maturity of Devonian shales in the northern Appalachian Basin, including %Ro , gas chromatogra- phy (GC) spectra of bitumen extracts, organic matter type, spectral fluorescence of Tasminites algae, and HI values. Vitrinite reflectance (%Ro ) is a key diagnostic tool for assessing thermal maturity and is based on measuring the reflectivity (R) of vitrinite through TABLE 1. Measured geochemical parameters describing source rock generative potential from TOC, S1 , S2 , and S1 + S2 † Quality TOC wt. % S1 mg HC/g rock S2 mg HC/g rock S1 + S2 mg HC/g rock Poor <0.5 0–0.5 0–2.5 0–3.0 Fair 0.5–1.0 0.5–1.0 2.5–5.0 3.0–6.0 Good 1.0–2.0 1.0–2.0 5.0–10.0 6.0–12.0 Very good 2.0–4.0 2.0–4.0 10.0–20.0 12.0–24.0 Excellent >4.0 >4.0 >20.0 >24.0 † Modified from Peters (1986) and Wallace and Roen (1989).
  • 7. 3 a microscope equipped with an oil-immersion ob- jective lens and photometer. Vitrinite is a maceral (plant and animal remains) found in many kero- gens and is formed from the thermal alteration of lignin and cellulose in plant walls. As temperature increases, vitrinite undergoes complex, irrevers- ible aromatization reactions that increase the reflectance. Reflectance measurements represent the percent of light reflected in oil, designated as %Ro . The oil window generally falls within a %Ro ranging from 0.6 to 1.4 (table 2). Values less than 0.6 %Ro are considered immature and those over 1.4 %Ro are considered overmature. Conodont alteration index (CAI) is based on color changes seen in microscopic-sized fossil teeth from the remains of eel-shaped chordates. These fossils are highly resistant to weathering and metamorphic temperature regimes and contain trace amounts of organic matter. Their color alteration is time and temperature dependent and is a progressive, irreversible condition, making them ideal for correlating to maximum tempera- tures. The CAI can be determined by comparing samples against a set of conodont color standards (table 2). Using CAI thermal maturation indices, the oil and gas windows are in a gradational boundary. The onset of oil generation is placed between 1.0 and 1.5, and the limit of oil genera- tion is between 2.0 and 2.5 (Harris, 1979). PREVIOUS WORK Previous work on the source rock properties and thermal maturity of the Devonian shale interval in Ohio and the Appalachian Basin have been published in studies funded by the DOE/EGSP and the GRI and also from reports published by the USGS. These re- ports and associated data provide a wealth of histori- cal data from which to reexamine the Devonian shale resources in Ohio and surrounding Appalachian Basin states. Reports published by EGSP contained data sets for 12 Devonian shale cores from eastern Ohio analyzed by Geochem Research, Inc. (U.S. DOE, 2007). These geochemical data reports included total organic carbon (TOC) and vitrinite reflectance (%Ro ) measurements, as well as density measurements, visual kerogen as- sessments, saturated hydrocarbon analyses, biostrati- graphic identification, and mineralogical analyses throughout the entire Devonian shale interval. Investigations funded by GRI included source rock geochemistry data from 98 Devonian shale sidewall core plugs from 4 wells in southeastern Ohio (Owen and others, 1985). This joint study by Terra Tek, Inc., Stocker and Sitler, and ResTech, Inc., contained TOC, Rock-Eval pyrolysis, and measured vitrinite reflectance data. ExLog/Brown and Ruth (1988) also published Devonian shale geochemical data based on cores and well cuttings from 18 wells in eastern Ohio. In another GRI-sponsored project, 98 full-diameter Devonian shale cores were taken along the outcrop trend in the early 1980s. This cooperative project between the Institute of Gas Technology (IGT), HYCRUDE Corpora- tion, Phillips Petroleum Company, and Bechtel Group sought to determine the feasibility of hydroretorting organic-rich shale for oil recovery (Weil and others, 1978). Although never commercially performed in Ohio, the Hytort process, developed by HYCRUDE Corporation, used hydrogen-rich gas during retorting to enhance oil yields from oil shales. Archived data for these 98 cores included TOC measurements, wireline logs, core descriptions, and calculated oil yield in gal- lons per ton. These cores and data permanently reside at the offices of the Ohio Geological Survey. U.S. Geological Survey Devonian shale investigations included Milici and Swezey (2006), Rowan (2006), Repetski and others (2008), East and others (2012), Ryder and others (2013), Hackley and others (2013), and Repetski and others (2014). Rowan (2006) ex- amined the burial and thermal history of the central Appalachian Basin using 2-D models for the Cambrian through Permian interval. In a resource assessment of the Devonian shale in the Appalachian Basin, Milici and Swezey (2006) used vitrinite reflectance (%Ro ) to assist in their evaluation. Milici and Swezey (2006) noted that %Ro values appeared to be underesti- mated based on a comparison to the %Ro values of the overlying Pennsylvanian coal beds; this phenom- enon was described as “vitrinite reflectance suppres- sion.” Repetski and others (2008) mapped thermal TABLE 2. Thermal maturity parameters describing types of hydrocarbon generated from Tmax, PI , %Ro , and CAI† Type Tmax (°C) PI [S1 /(S1 +S2 )] %Ro CAI Immature <435 <0.1 0.2–0.6 0–1.0 Top oil window 435–445 0.1 0.6 1.0–1.5 Bottom oil window 470 0.4 1.4 1.5–2.0 Postmature >470 >0.4 >1.4 >2.0 † Modified from Peters and Cassa (1984).
  • 8. 4 maturity patterns for Ordovician and Devonian rocks in the Appalachian Basin using both CAI and %Ro . East and others (2012) constructed a regional thermal maturity map of the Devonian shale based on %Ro that included the Illinois, Michigan, and Appalachian Basins. Thermal maturity of the Devonian shale in the northern Appalachian Basin was examined by Hackley and others (2013) using multiple techniques. Vitrinite reflectance, Rock-Eval pyrolysis, gas chromatography, and GC-mass spectrometry were evaluated on three transects. Results from vitrinite reflectance indicated that most samples in eastern Ohio were immature, and higher vitrinite reflectance values were present in the overlying Pennsylvanian coals; these findings supported previous studies that vitrinite reflectance values in the Devonian shale appeared to be sup- pressed. A major revision of thermal maturity patterns was made by Repetski and others (2014) for Devonian and Ordovician rocks in the Appalachian Basin using CAI and vitrinite reflectance data. In their study, the distribution of Devonian CAI and %Ro were related to structural features and oil-and-gas fields. METHODOLOGY For this project, Devonian shale source rock geo- chemistry and thermal maturity data were compiled from published sources and from all archived data on file at the Ohio Geological Survey. Archived data included older source rock data from Devonian shale research dating back to the 1970s and 1980s along with recently submitted data (since 2011) for uncon- ventional shale exploration using horizontal drilling and massive hydraulic fracturing. Published sources included reports and data from the USGS, the EGSP studies, and GRI investigations. The USGS has sam- pled numerous cores and cuttings from the Devonian shale interval over the past decade. Published references on source rock geochemistry for the Devonian shale interval were compiled and all pertinent source rock data from these publications were entered into a digital database that was incorpo- rated into the geochemistry source rock and thermal maturity mapping. All historic and recent source rock geochemistry data submitted to the Ohio Geologi- cal Survey was entered into a digital database. The data was edited for accuracy and com- pleteness. The Ohio Geological Survey source rock geochemis- try database represents all pub- lic domain data and includes older data from the 1970s and 1980s, as well as recent data obtained from operators. Source rock data compiled and used for this investigation are listed in the Appendix, and the well locations are shown in Figure 1. For this investigation, source rock geochemistry data was available for 201 unique wells in the study area of eastern Ohio (fig. 1). For some wells, geochemical analyses were performed on the same well by multiple operators. Of the 201 unique wells, 175 wells had TOC data, 118 wells had S1 and S2 data, and 55 wells had %Ro data. Published CAI data was available for only 17 wells in the mapped area, with 13 in Ohio and 4 in West Virginia for additional control. Samples for additional CAI analyses for the Devonian Onondaga Limestone interval were collected from 13 IN WV KY PA MI ERIE LAKE Ross Stark Pike Wood Darke Knox Licking Scioto Adams Gallia Wayne Huron Perry Clark Allen Butler Lorain Seneca Logan Brown Athens Union Trumbull Meigs Ashtabula Hardin Henry Franklin Preble Noble Mercer Portage Erie Fulton Miami Belmont Hancock Vinton Fairfield Putnam Highland Lucas Carroll Shelby Richland Monroe Clinton Greene Muskingum Fayette Marion Warren Medina Holmes Pickaway Guernsey Morgan Madison Washington Coshocton Geauga Jackson Hocking Summit Ashland Morrow Lake Clermont Tuscarawas Delaware Williams Harrison Paulding Defiance Lawrence Auglaize Van Wert Cuyahoga Wyandot Hamilton Columbiana Jefferson Crawford Sandusky Mahoning Champaign Ottawa Montgomery Core (101) Cuttings (100) Ohio Shale outcrop 0 50 Miles 0 50 Kilometers FIGURE 1. Sampled wells used for source rock mapping of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
  • 9. 5 additional wells in eastern Ohio to provide a better geographic distribution of data. These samples were sent to the USGS to determine the CAI, but results were unavailable by the publication of this report. The source rock data was reviewed for accuracy. Data reported as suspect by the laboratory analyses company were removed to improve the accuracy of the interpretation and mapping. For %Ro measure- ments, only those samples identified as indigenous were used for mapping. Other measured values from cuttings that were not indigenous were considered suspect and may have been from caving material from higher stratigraphic intervals. Queries were performed to calculate the average and maximum values of the Devonian shale interval for the following attributes: TOC, S1 , S2 , %Ro , and CAI. Preliminary maps of TOC, S1 , S2 , %Ro , and CAI per well were constructed using IHS Petra® software. The final maps for this report were generated using ESRI ArcGIS® software for all mapped attributes. Each con- tour shape file was manually edited to honor all data points. Anomalous data values were examined from the original data sources, and the database was edited where data was suspect. For consistency, the maxi- mum values of source rock attributes were mapped for this project. It should be noted that data was sampled from both core and well cuttings, which may skew the data. Sampling from core is generally more selec- tive since the more organic-rich zones are targeted for analyses. Sampling from well cuttings are blended or mixed over a 10 to 20-ft (3–7-m) interval. Thus measured values for well cuttings may be suppressed when compared with those sampled from cores. REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHIC AND STRUCTURAL SETTING The Devonian shale sequence of eastern Ohio is an eastward-thickening wedge of sediments on the west- ern flank of the Appalachian Basin. This eastward- thickening stratigraphic interval is well documented and illustrated in eastern Ohio and across the Appa- lachian Basin through numerous cross sections and schematic diagrams by various authors (Rich, 1951; Gray and others, 1982; Potter and others, 1982; Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 1988; Roen and Kep- ferle, 1993; Boswell, 1996; and Baranoski and Riley, 2013). These studies provided a subsurface strati- graphic framework that was tied into the Devonian shale outcrops in western New York and central and northeastern Ohio. The Devonian shale stratigraphic interval for this investigation extends from the top of the Middle Devonian Onondaga Limestone to the base of the Upper Devonian Berea Sandstone (fig. 2 and plate 1). Stratigraphic nomenclature used for this investigation (fig. 2) is based on the nomenclature established for the EGSP (Gray and others, 1982) and also used in the GRI-Devonian shale study (Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 1988). The basinwide Devonian shale sequence consists of two dominant facies: black, organic-rich shale and gray to greenish-gray, silty shale. The organic-rich shale units can be correlated regionally across the basin with wireline logs based on the higher gamma ray signature and typically higher porosity response on the density curve. The more organic-rich facies of the Marcellus Shale, Rhinestreet Shale Member of the Olentangy Shale, and Huron Shale Member of the Ohio Shale have been the primary targets for hydro- carbon production and exploration in this interval. In these unconventional reservoirs, the organic-rich shale serves as the source rock, reservoir, and seal. The Mar- cellus Shale has been extensively drilled with hori- zontal wells in western Pennsylvania, western West Virginia, and extreme eastern Ohio where thickness is greater than 50 ft (15 m). In Ohio, the Marcellus Shale reaches a maximum thickness of approximately 75 ft (23 m) in eastern Monroe and Washington Counties (Erenpreiss and others, 2011). The Marcellus Shale and Rhinestreet Shale thin westward and disappear in east- ern Ohio, while the Huron Shale can be traced as far 3408922581 Hunting Oil Co. Doyle Wolford TD=2990 ft 911 m Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD RHOB 2.000 3.000G/C3 TVD 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 Cleveland Sh Mbr Sunbury Sh Bedford Sh Berea Ss Chagrin Sh Mbr upper Huron Sh Mbr middle Huron Sh Mbr lower Huron Sh Mbr Java Fm Angola Sh Mbr Pipe Creek Sh Mbr Rhinestreet Sh Mbr Onondaga Ls Hamilton Gp Marcellus Sh Ohio Sh “Upper” Olentangy Sh “Lower” Olentangy Sh Depth ft. Porosity GR 600 ROHB MIDDLE DEVONIAN UPPER DEVONIAN MISSIS– SIPPIAN Unit abbreviations: Fm = Formation, Gp = Group, Ls = Limestone, Mbr = Member, Sh = Shale, Ss = Sandstone. Geologic Unit System/ Period FIGURE 2. Typical well log from Licking County, Ohio, showing stratigraphic nomenclature for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio.
  • 10. 6 west as the outcrop belt in central Ohio (plate 1). The Devonian shale outcrops at the surface in central Ohio trending north–south and then curves eastward along Lake Erie in northern Ohio. In the Appalachian Basin portion of Ohio, the Devonian shale interval is absent west of the outcrop belt with the exception of the Bellefontaine Outlier in Logn County. The Devonian shale interval thickens eastward to over 3,500 ft (1,067 m) in extreme eastern Ohio (fig. 3). The Devonian An- trim Shale (Ohio Shale equivalent) outcrops in north- western Ohio at the southeastern edge of the Michigan Basin and deepens basinward to the northwest. Devonian shales are thought to be transgressive basin-fill sequences related to active subsidence and tectonism (Potter and others, 1981). Deposition of these shales occurred in a shallow to deep foreland basin setting west of the active Acadian orogenic belt. Rapid transgression following the Middle Devonian unconformity resulted in sediment covering the Cin- cinnati and Findlay Arches. Controls on distribution and preservation of organic matter remains in debate, but the organics are thought to have been deposited during anoxic to dysoxic conditions (Potter and oth- ers, 1981). Black shales accumulated under low-energy conditions in a euxinic basin across the region far from the Acadian orogenic belt. These black shales are deeper-water facies equivalent to the clastics deposited from the Catskill delta to the east. The top of the Devonian shale interval deepens basin- ward from the outcrop belt in central Ohio to more than 1,250 ft (380 m) below sea level in extreme eastern Ohio (fig. 4). Regional dip on the top of the Devonian shale in- terval averages about 30 ft per mi (5.7 m per km), but this may vary by local structural anomalies. The most promi- nent structural feature is the northwest–southeast-trending Cambridge Cross-Strike Structural Discontinuity. Three major fault zones are evident at the top of the Devonian shale interval and are named the Highlandtown Fault, the Akron-Suffield Fault System, and the Middleburg Fault. DISCUSSION Source rock geochemistry provides the fundamental information needed to evaluate and map the organic rich- ness, type, and thermal maturity of a source rock. The re- sulting maps are a necessary step to aid in determining the stratigraphic and geographic extent of source rocks in the Devonian shale petroleum system. The volume, organic richness, and thermal maturity of these source rocks deter- mine the amount of oil and gas that may be generated and become available for traps. Source Rock Geochemistry The preliminary findings of source rock geochemistry data for Ohio represent a first-round screening of Devo- nian black shale source rock potential based on recent and historical data. These data and interpretations do not take into account the sample quality. Rock sample quality for source rock measurements generally decrease in the following order: conventional full-diameter core, side- wall core, drill cuttings, and outcrops. Well cuttings may be contaminated by caving material from higher in the stratigraphic section or from drilling mud. Age of the rock samples also affects their reliability and source rock mea- surements. Samples that have been stored for long periods of time generally are reliable if they are cleaned and stored under proper conditions to restrict the growth of fungus (Peters and Cassa, 1994). For this project, data that was indicated to be suspect by the analytical laboratory was removed for mapping and interpretation purposes. Ad- ditional work is necessary to take into account the quality and storage time of rock samples used for these source rock measurements. Source rock potential maps Parameters to assess source rock generative potential for hydrocarbon production include TOC, S1 , and S2 . Source rock quality based on these parameters was defined by Peters (1986; table 1). Maximum TOC values for the Devonian shale interval in Ohio range from 0.5 to 18.4 percent in eastern and central Ohio (table A-1). Over 70 percent of the maximum TOC values per well were greater than 4 percent (excellent source rock generative potential). The maximum TOC map indicated a general westward increase in values across the state (fig. 5). Extreme east- ern Ohio typically had values ranging from 2 to 4 percent, which is considered very good source rock generative potential. West of the 4 percent contour, maximum TOC was generally greater than 4 percent. The highest values were in central Ohio along the Devonian shale outcrop trend where maximum TOC values generally were greater than 10 percent. All values along the outcrop trend were taken from core samples. As noted previously, source rock measurements from core often exceed those from well cut- tings because they generally are sampled preferentially in intervals of more organic-rich zones when compared with well cuttings, where the samples are blended over a 10 to 20-ft (3–7-m) interval. When compared with maps and data for the Upper Ordovician shale interval (Utica-Point Pleasant units) published by the Ohio Division of Geologi- cal Survey (2013a), the Devonian shale interval has sig- nificantly higher TOC values than the deeper Ordovician shales. Maximum TOC values for the Upper Ordovician shale interval typically ranged from 2 to 3 percent with a maximum value of 7.3 percent. The S1 and S2 measurements also can be useful indica- tors of source rock potential (Peters, 1986; Wallace and Roen, 1989). Maximum S1 values range from 0.2 to 8.6 mg HC/g of rock in Ohio (table A-1). A westward-increasing trend of higher S1 measurements, similar to the TOC trend, is reflected on the S1 isopleth map (fig. 6). Extreme eastern Ohio is generally in the 1 to 2 mg HC/g range, which is
  • 11. 7 IN WV KY PA MI ERIE LAKE Ross Stark Pike Wood Darke Knox Licking Scioto Adams Gallia Wayne Huron Perry Clark Allen Butler Lorain Seneca Logan Brown Athens Union Trumbull Meigs Ashtabula Hardin Henry Franklin Preble Noble Mercer Portage Erie Fulton Miami Belmont Hancock Vinton Fairfield Putnam Highland Lucas Carroll Shelby Richland Monroe Clinton Greene Muskingum Fayette Marion Warren Medina Holmes Pickaway Guernsey Morgan Madison Washington Coshocton Geauga Jackson Hocking Summit Ashland Morrow Lake Clermont Tuscarawas Delaware Williams Harrison Paulding Defiance Lawrence Auglaize Van Wert Cuyahoga Wyandot Hamilton Columbiana Jefferson Crawford Sandusky Mahoning Champaign Ottawa Montgomery 3250 2750 2500 2250 2000 1750 1500 1250 1000 750 50 0 2750 2000 1000 1750 1500 1250 750 500 250 0 3500 2500 3250 3000 250 3000 250 250 3500 ASFS HF MF CCSD 250-ft contour Fault Thickness, in ft 3,530 (1,076 m) 0 0 50 Miles 0 50 Kilometers FIGURE 3. Map of interval thickness of the Devonian Shale interval. Modified from Wickstrom and others (2005). Ohio Shale outcrop Akron-Suffield Fault System Cambridge Cross-Strike Structural Discontinuity Highlandtown Fault Middleburg Fault ASFS = CCSD = HF = MF = FIGURE 3. Map of interval thickness of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Modified from Wickstrom and others (2005).
  • 12. 8 IN WV KY PA MI ERIE LAKE Ross Stark Pike Wood Darke Knox Licking Scioto Adams Gallia Wayne Huron Perry Clark Allen Butler Lorain Seneca Logan Brown Athens Union Trumbull Meigs Ashtabula Hardin Henry Franklin Preble Noble Mercer Portage Erie Fulton Miami Belmont Hancock Vinton Fairfield Putnam Highland Lucas Carroll Shelby Richland Monroe Clinton Greene Muskingum Fayette Marion Warren Medina Holmes Pickaway Guernsey Morgan Madison Washington Coshocton Geauga Jackson Hocking Summit Ashland Morrow Lake Clermont Tuscarawas Delaware Williams Harrison Paulding Defiance Lawrence Auglaize Van Wert Cuyahoga Wyandot Hamilton Columbiana Jefferson Crawford Sandusky Mahoning Champaign Ottawa Montgomery 250 0 -250 -500 -750 -1000 750 500 1000 750 7 50 500 500 250 -1250 750 1000 750 750 750 750 -1250 -1250 ASFS HF MF CCSD 250-ft contour Fault Elevation, in ft 1,070 (326 m) -1,505 (-459 m) 0 50 Miles 0 50 Kilometers FIGURE 4. Structure map on top of the Devonian Shale interval in eastern Ohio. Modified from Wickstrom and others (2005). Akron-Suffield Fault System Cambridge Cross-Strike Structural Discontinuity Highlandtown Fault Middleburg Fault ASFS = CCSD = HF = MF = Ohio Shale outcrop FIGURE 4. Structure map on top of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Modified from Wickstrom and others (2005).
  • 13. 9 FIGURE 5. Isopleth map of the maximum total organic carbon (TOC) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. IN WV KY PA MI ERIE LAKE Ross Stark Pike Wood Darke Knox Licking Scioto Adams Gallia Wayne Huron Perry Clark Allen Butler Lorain Seneca Logan Brown Athens Union Trumbull Meigs Ashtabula Hardin Henry Franklin Preble Noble Mercer Portage Erie Fulton Miami Belmont Hancock Vinton Fairfield Putnam Highland Lucas Carroll Shelby Richland Monroe Clinton Greene Muskingum Fayette Marion Warren Medina Holmes Pickaway Guernsey Morgan Madison Washington Coshocton Geauga Jackson Hocking Summit Ashland Morrow Lake Clermont Tuscarawas Delaware Williams Harrison Paulding Defiance Lawrence Auglaize Van Wert Cuyahoga Wyandot Hamilton Columbiana Jefferson Crawford Sandusky Mahoning Champaign Ottawa Montgomery 5 2 5 4 10 3 5 3 5 3 3 2 10 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 2 5 4 5 4 4 3 5 5 6 10 5 4 3 5 10 5 4 4 2 2 2 5 3 4 3 1 3 1 0 10 5 5 5 4 3 3 1 4 4 7.4 7.1 6.6 6.2 1.3 7.3 1.5 13 3.5 8.7 6 4.4 3.6 5.45.3 4.5 2.9 3.8 2.3 7.4 3.4 3.6 5.2 8.8 5.8 6 13.8 7.3 9.6 9.1 4 3.9 4.8 7.1 2.91.1 3.6 2.8 5.2 5.1 7.7 4 3.9 8.2 4.3 3.3 7.6 6.7 2.7 2.3 11.7 4.4 3.7 2.7 3 4.9 1.5 6.3 1.3 1.6 4.4 4 3.7 5.6 9 3 1.2 12.6 4.6 5.4 5.2 7.3 8.1 4.4 8.3 6.1 8.6 1.9 8.4 3.6 2.61.8 5.3 2.6 2.4 3.4 1.1 5.3 4.7 6.1 2.4 6 3.6 2.5 4.8 1.7 5.5 3.6 3.7 1.9 11.3 4.3 3.6 8 4.9 8.8 6.6 2.2 1.5 4.1 12.1 3.6 12.6 16.6 9.2 9.9 12.718.4 3.9 14.4 13.7 11.4 11.2 11.3 12.1 12.5 11.9 11.5 10.5 11.7 11.9 11.6 10.3 8.6 8.5 11.1 14 12.8 14.3 12.4 14.4 10.8 13.3 11.2 10.5 8.9 10.9 10 12.1 12.1 10.9 11.2 10.6 10.8 18.3 13.313.8 14.2 13.6 13.6 14.2 13.5 14.4 6.3 TOC data source TOC contour TOC maximum, weight % High : 18.4% Low : 0.5% 0 50 Miles 0 50 Kilometers FIGURE 5. Isopleth map of the maximum total organic carbon (TOC) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Ohio Shale outcrop
  • 14. 10 FIGURE 6. Isopleth map of the maximum S1 (existing hydrocarbons) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. IN WV KY PA MI ERIE LAKE Ross Stark Pike Wood Darke Knox Licking Scioto Adams Gallia Wayne Huron Perry Clark Allen Butler Lorain Seneca Logan Brown Athens Union Trumbull Meigs Ashtabula Hardin Henry Franklin Preble Noble Mercer Portage Erie Fulton Miami Belmont Hancock Vinton Fairfield Putnam Highland Lucas Carroll Shelby Richland Monroe Clinton Greene Muskingum Fayette Marion Warren Medina Holmes Pickaway Guernsey Morgan Madison Washington Coshocton Geauga Jackson Hocking Summit Ashland Morrow Lake Clermont Tuscarawas Delaware Williams Harrison Paulding Defiance Lawrence Auglaize Van Wert Cuyahoga Wyandot Hamilton Columbiana Jefferson Crawford Sandusky Mahoning Champaign Ottawa Montgomery 3 1 4 3 3 1 4 3 2 3 2 2 1 3 1 3 2 4 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 3 2 4 3 4 3 2 1 1 0.5 4 2 1 1 4 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 2 1 2 2 4 0.50.5 2 2 0.5 0.5 4 3 2 0.5 2 1 1 3 0.6 1.7 1.8 1.5 2 0.8 2.6 0.7 3 1.4 3.1 3.6 1.72 1.92.4 2.8 0.7 1 1.2 2.5 1.3 2 1.5 2 1.4 3 0.5 2 4.7 1.4 1.6 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.6 2.2 1.1 2.5 0.9 2.3 2.9 0.8 2.2 2 1.6 4.7 4.6 1.3 1 2.7 1.1 1.4 1 1.5 1.8 4.3 0.60.4 0.5 2.2 1 2.3 2.4 0.8 0.4 6.5 2.2 2 2.4 1.9 5.2 1.2 2 4.9 0.8 5.7 1.1 0.80.4 1.6 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.4 1.3 1.8 1.7 2 1.1 2.4 0.8 1.4 3 0.3 1.2 2.5 2.4 5.6 2 2.2 8.1 2.6 2.8 3.3 1.3 0.4 2.1 4.4 2.2 2 1.7 4 4.8 4.5 5.97.3 2.3 S1 data source S1 contour S1 maximum, generative potential 8.6 0.2 0 50 Miles 0 50 Kilometers FIGURE 6. Isopleth map of the maximum S1 (existing hydrocarbons) for the Devonian Shale interval in eastern Ohio. Ohio Shale outcrop
  • 15. 11 considered to be good source rock generation potential (table A-1). Measurements of S1 and S2 were not taken for the cores along the Devonian shale outcrop trend. Thus the majority of measurements for these maps are from well cuttings. The S2 measurements for the Devonian shale interval range from 0.5 to 115 mg HC/g of rock in Ohio (table A-1). Extreme eastern Ohio contains S2 values of less than 5 mg HC/g of rock (fair source rock generative potential). Most values are in the 10–20 (very good source rock generative potential) or 20–40 mg HC/g of rock range (excellent source rock generative potential). The S2 map reflects a similar westward-increasing trend with the TOC and S1 maps (fig. 7). Thermal maturity maps Maximum vitrinite reflectance values for the Devonian shale interval in Ohio ranged from 0.33 to 1.34 %Ro (table A-1). A basinward (eastward) transition to more thermally mature rocks is evident on the %Ro isograds (fig. 8). An immature region is evident throughout central and west- ern Ohio where values trending northeast–southwest are less than 0.6 %Ro . Four local anomalies are present west of the 0.6 %Ro isograd where values exceed the 0.6 cutoff. These anomalies may be a result of false measurements from well cuttings that were not indigenous to the zone of interest. The onset of oil generation is considered to begin at 0.6 and to end at 1.1 %Ro (table 2). This narrow zone is present on the isograd map of the maximum vitrinite reflectance and trends northeast–southwest through east- ern Ohio (fig. 8). The oil window transitions eastward to a condensate or wet gas window based on a thermal ma- turity of 1.1 to 1.4 %Ro (fig. 8). Using a cutoff of 1.4 %Ro , a dry gas window is not evident in the mapped area of Ohio but is shown to the east on regional maps of extreme western Pennsylvania and West Virginia by Ryder and others (2013) and Repetski and others (2014). As expected, %Ro values were lower than those on the deeper Upper Ordovician %Ro map (Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 2013b), but displayed the same eastward-maturing trend. The phenomenon described by Lo (1993) as “vitrin- ite reflectance suppression” or underestimation of %Ro values has been recognized by numerous authors for the Devonian shale interval in the northern Appalachian Basin (Milici and Swezey, 2006; Hackley and others, 2013; Ryder and others, 2013; Repetski and others. 2014). Evidence for Devonian shale “vitrinite suppression” is supported by comparison to values in the overlying Pennsylvanian coals and the position of Devonian shale natural gas fields compared with mapped %Ro values in eastern Ohio. Devonian shale %Ro values commonly are lower than those for the overlying coals that are 1,500 to 2,000 ft (450- 600m)shallower. The %Ro(max) of 0.6 for the Pennsylvanian isograd is up to 50 mi (80km) west of the 0.5 %Ro isograd for the Devonian shale interval (Ryder and others, 2013). Assuming the Pennsylvanian coal vitrinite measurements are accurate, this creates an inverted thermal maturity profile and indicates that the Devonian shale %Ro values are anomalously low. Explanations for this “vitrinite sup- pression” are related to syndepositional and post-burial processes that include bitumen impregnation, host rock lithology, overpressure, variations in vitrinite precursor material, and incorporation of organic sulfur (Hutton and Cook, 1980; Price and Barker, 1985; McTavish, 1998; Carr, 2000; Barker and others, 2007; Ryder and others, 2013). The production of dry gas and absence of produced liquids from the Devonian shale in southeastern Ohio also indicates a thermal maturity greater than that indicated by the %Ro map. Devonian shale producing fields in south- eastern Ohio are dominated by dry gas production with no oil reported (Riley and others, 2004). The vitrinite reflec- tance map shows values ranging from 0.6 to 1.0 %Ro (oil window) in these dry gas producing fields. These produc- tion numbers are further evidence that the vitrinite reflec- tance values may be suppressed. If these thermal maturity measurements are accurate, then natural gas likely mi- grated from the deeper part of the basin to the east. All data for the CAI map was based upon a published report by Repetski and others (2008), and since no ad- ditional data was available for this project, the CAI map closely resembles that from their published study. The immature, oil, gas-and-oil, and gas windows are evident from this mapped data and also show an increased ma- turity basinward (fig. 9). The immature boundary (using a CAI value of 1 or less) that trends roughly north–south through central Ohio is influenced by a lack of data in western Ohio. The onset of oil generation is generally considered to begin at a CAI value of 1.0 and end at 2.0. Additional data points in eastern Ohio currently are being analyzed for CAI measurements but were not available for this publication. CONCLUSIONS During the past decade, exploration in the Devonian organic-rich black shale interval using horizontal drill- ing and massive hydraulic fracturing has generated additional source rock geochemistry data for this pro- lific, unconventional oil-and-gas play in Ohio, Penn- sylvania, and West Virginia. Up to now, the focus of this drilling and exploration has been in the Marcellus Shale, the basal unit of the Devonian shale sequence. Based on historic conventional production and source rock geochemistry compiled for this project, other Devonian organic-rich shale units, such as the lower Huron Shale Member and Rhinestreet Shale Member, also have significant potential and are good candidates for modern-day horizontal drilling techniques. Devonian shale source rock geochemistry and ther- mal maturity data was compiled from a detailed inven- tory of all published and archived sources to provide a
  • 16. 12 FIGURE 7. Isopleth map of the maximum S2 (hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. IN WV KY PA MI ERIE LAKE Ross Stark Pike Wood Darke Knox Licking Scioto Adams Gallia Wayne Huron Perry Clark Allen Butler Lorain Seneca Logan Brown Athens Union Trumbull Meigs Ashtabula Hardin Henry Franklin Preble Noble Mercer Portage Erie Fulton Miami Belmont Hancock Vinton Fairfield Putnam Highland Lucas Carroll Shelby Richland Monroe Clinton Greene Muskingum Fayette Marion Warren Medina Holmes Pickaway Guernsey Morgan Madison Washington Coshocton Geauga Jackson Hocking Summit Ashland Morrow Lake Clermont Tuscarawas Delaware Williams Harrison Paulding Defiance Lawrence Auglaize Van Wert Cuyahoga Wyandot Hamilton Columbiana Jefferson Crawford Sandusky Mahoning Champaign Ottawa Montgomery 25 5 35 30 25 20 15 10 40 20 35 30 25 25 20 201510 20 10 35 25 15 10 10 5 105 10 5 15 15 10 40 25 35 35 40 35 40 30 20 15 35 30 25 20 20 15 5 5 20 2 0 10 5 35 3 0 25 25 25 5 2 0 25 15 10 35.3 34 29.5 22.1 32.1 3.3 28.8 16.4 10.9 3.6 1013.4 7.3 9.6 13.4 20.3 8.2 36.5 15.9 14.9 20.7 41.7 25.9 29 18 36.3 39.7 18.9 20 15.6 19.1 7.5 2.1 12.8 6.1 25.9 18.9 44.4 14.1 19.3 44.3 4.3 2.9 39.1 31.7 8.9 7.3 24.1 9.9 13.8 8.2 8.5 18.1 27.3 2.62.8 11.6 18.4 20.9 20.4 11.8 5.6 1.6 28.6 22.3 20.7 21.2 33.4 41.2 21 29.3 55.9 5 37 10.3 8.9 6.6 15.9 7.5 8.912.3 2.1 26.1 30 9.3 12.1 5.9 13.6 4.1 4.3 14.6 3.7 19.5 33.1 13.6 73.7 11.4 5.3 42 24.2 31.5 20.7 5.5 1.3 14.9 55.7 9.343.6 34.4 51 39.4 67.9 65.3115 5.8 S2 data source S2 contour S2 maximum, generative potential 115 0.5 0 50 Miles 0 50 Kilometers FIGURE 7. Isopleth map of the maximum S2 (hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis) for the Devonian shale interval in Ohio. Ohio Shale outcrop
  • 17. 13 FIGURE 8. Isograd map of the maximum vitrinite reflectance (%Ro ) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. ERIE LAKE 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.59 0.72 1.04 0.42 0.35 0.45 0.44 0.41 0.44 0.61 0.72 0.78 0.45 0.39 0.72 1.34 0.76 0.46 0.75 0.79 0.78 0.43 0.55 1.16 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.4 0.57 0.42 0.44 0.62 0.92 0.62 0.64 0.7 0.8 0.72 1.28 0.51 0.69 0.67 0.59 0.82 0.62 0.43 0.98 0.42 0.42 0.33 0.48 0.480.46 0.49 1.06
  • 18. 14 FIGURE 9. Isograd map of the conodont alteration index (CAI) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. IN WV KY PA MI ERIE LAKE Ross Stark Pike Wood Darke Knox Licking Scioto Adams Gallia Wayne Huron Perry Clark Allen Butler Lorain Seneca Logan Brown Athens Union Trumbull Meigs Ashtabula Hardin Henry Franklin Preble Noble Mercer Portage Erie Fulton Miami Belmont Hancock Vinton Fairfield Putnam Highland Lucas Carroll Shelby Richland Monroe Clinton Greene Muskingum Fayette Marion Warren Medina Holmes Pickaway Guernsey Morgan Madison Washington Coshocton Geauga Jackson Hocking Summit Ashland Morrow Lake Clermont Tuscarawas Delaware Williams Harrison Paulding Defiance Lawrence Auglaize Van Wert Cuyahoga Wyandot Hamilton Columbiana Jefferson Crawford Sandusky Mahoning Champaign Ottawa Montgomery 1 1 1 1.5 2 1.5 1.5 2 1.5 2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1+ 1+ 1+ 1.5 1+ 1+ 1.5 1+ 1.5 1.5 CAI data source CAI contour 1 1.5 2 0 50 Miles 0 50 Kilometers FIGURE 9. Isograd map of the conodont alteration index (CAI) for the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Ohio Shale outcrop CAI maximum <1 1–1.5 1.5–2 >2
  • 19. 15 comprehensive database from 201 wells in eastern and central Ohio. Preliminary maps of TOC, S1 , S2 , %Ro , and CAI were constructed to better refine the source rock generative potential and thermal maturity of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. Maximum TOC values per well for the Devonian shale interval range from 0.5 to 18.4 percent. A west- ward increase in TOC is present with over 70 percent of the wells having values greater than 4 percent (excellent source rock generative potential). Devonian shale maximum TOC values along the outcrop trend usually exceed 10 percent. The maximum TOC value of the Devonian shale interval is over twice that of the underlying Upper Ordovician Utica-Point Pleasant shale interval, which has a maximum value of 7.3 per- cent and values typically in the 2 to 3 percent range. The S1 and S2 values in the Devonian shale interval also indicate good source rock generative potential and maps display a westward increase similar to the TOC map. Maximum S1 values per well range from 0.2 to 8.6 mg HC/g of rock. In eastern Ohio the S1 values generally range from 1 to 2 mg HC/g of rock, which is indicative of good source rock generative potential. Maximum S2 values are often in the 10–20 (very good) or 20–40 (excellent) mg HC/g rock range. Vitrinite reflectance and CAI were mapped to assess the thermal maturity of the Devonian shale interval in eastern Ohio. A basinward (eastward) transition to more thermally mature rocks is evident on both maps. Maximum vitrinite reflectance values range from 0.33 to 1.34 %Ro . A 0.6 %Ro isograd trends northeast– southwest through eastern Ohio and marks the onset of oil generation and separates the immature region to the west. The oil window transitions eastward to a condensate or wet gas window at values between 1.1 and 1.4 %Ro in extreme eastern Ohio. “Vitrinite suppression” is supported by previous USGS studies, comparison to %Ro in the overlying coals, and also with historic production numbers in southeastern Ohio, which indicate natural gas production with no liquids. Further study is recommended to account for the apparent “vitrinite suppression” and better refine the %Ro map. A limited dataset of 17 wells were used for the CAI map. The immature boundary trends ap- proximately north–south in central Ohio based on CAI values of 1 or less. Onset of oil generation is generally considered to begin at a CAI of 1.0 and end at 2.0. The preliminary maps and data generated for this report are a result of Ohio Geological Survey efforts to provide an updated compilation of information to assist explorationists in assessing this important and high potential oil-and-gas play. Thickness, depth, and pressure are additional geologic factors, as are current economic pricing conditions, which need to be taken into account in the assessment and exploration strat- egy of these organic-rich Devonian shale zones. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge all of the operators who have submitted source rock geochemistry data. Thanks also go to the U.S. Geological Survey for its continuing research on this topic and for the analy- ses it has performed on Ohio samples over the years. Without USGS data, this study would not have been possible. Thanks to Dean Martin of the ODNR Office of Information Technology for doing the final revi- sions to the maps, to Matt Erenpreiss for assisting with figures, and to Joe Wells for providing assistance in the database compilation. This manuscript was greatly improved because of the edits of Chuck Salmons. The assistance of reviewers Mohammad Fakhari and Tom Serenko is greatly appreciated. Finally, thanks to Dave Orr of the ODNR Creative Services group for the final compilation of this report. REFERENCES CITED Baranoski, M.T., and Riley, R.A., 2013, Analysis of stratigraphic, structural, and production relation- ships of Devonian shale as reservoirs in Meigs County, Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Resourc- es, Division of Geological Survey Open-File Report 88-3, 29 p. Barker, C.E., Lewan, M.D., and Pawlewicz, M.J., 2007, The influence of extractable organic matter on vi- trinite reflectance suppression—A survey of kero- gen and coal types: International Journal of Coal Geology, v. 70, p. 67–78. Boswell, Ray, 1996, Play UDs—Upper Devonian black shales, in Roen, J.B., and Walker, B.J., eds., The atlas of major Appalachian Basin gas plays: West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey Publica- tion V25, p. 93–99. Carr, A.D., 2000, Suppression and retardation of vitrin- ite reflectance, part 1—Formation and significance for hydrocarbon generation: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 23, p. 313–343. East, J.A., Swezey, C.S., Repetski, J.E., and Hayba, D.O., 2012, Thermal maturity map of Devonian shale in the Illinois, Michigan, and Appalachian basins of North America: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3214, scale 1:24,000. Erenpreiss, M.S., Wickstrom, L.H., Perry, C.J., Riley, R.A., Martin, D.R., and others, 2011, Organic- thickness map of the Marcellus Shale in Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geo- logical Survey, scale 1 inch equals 27 miles. EXLOG and Brown and Ruth Laboratories, 1988, Well
  • 20. 16 sample/borehole diagnostic methods for tight black shales—Final report (October, 1985–August, 1988) prepared for GRI: Gas Research Institute report per Contract No. 5085-213-1181, 28 p., 5 appendices. Gray, J.D., and others, 1982, An integrated study of the Devonian-age black shales in eastern Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey final report for U.S. DOE East- ern Gas Shales Project, U.S Department of Energy Report No. DOE/ET/12131-1399. Hackley, P.C., Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., and Alimi, Hossein, 2013, Thermal maturity of northern Ap- palachian Basin Devonian shales—Insights from sterane and terpane biomarkers: Fuel, v. 106, p. 445-462. Harris, A.G., 1979, Conodont color alteration, an orga- no-mineral metamorphic index, and its application to Appalachian Basin geology, in Scholle, P.A., and Schluger, P.R., eds., Aspects of diagenesis: Society of Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publi- cation 26, p. 3–16. Hutton, A.C., and Cook, A.C., 1980, Influence of al- ginite on the reflectance of vitrinite: Fuel, v. 59, p. 711–716. Lo, H.B., 1993, Correction criteria for the suppression of vitrinite reflectance in hydrogen-rich kerogens; Preliminary guidelines: Organic Geochemistry, v. 20, no. 6, p. 653–657. McCarthy, Kevin, Rojas, Katherine, Niemann, Martin, Palmoski, Daniel, Peters, K.E., and Stankiewicz, Arthur, 2011, Basic petroleum geochemistry for source rock evaluation: Oilfield Review, v. 23, no. 2, p. 32–43. McTavish, R.A., 1998, The role of overpressure in the retardation of organic matter maturation: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 21, p. 153–186. Milici, R.C., and Swezey, C.S., 2006, Assessment of Appalachian Basin oil and gas resources—Devo- nian shale–Middle and Upper Paleozoic total pe- troleum system: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report Series 2006-1237, 70 p. Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 1988, Analysis of stratigraphic and production relationships of De- vonian shale gas reservoirs in Ohio: Ohio Depart- ment of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey final report (October 1985–November 1988) prepared for Gas Research Institute Contract No. 5085-213-1154, 49 p., 15 pls. Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 2013a, Maximum TOC value per well of the Upper Ordovician shale interval in Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Re- sources, Division of Geological Survey map, scale 1:2,000,000, accessed December 18, 2015, <http:// geosurvey.ohiodnr.gov/portals/geosurvey/Energy/ Utica/Ordov-Shale_TOC-Max_03-2013.pdf>. Ohio Division of Geological Survey, 2013b, Calculated %Ro average per well of the Upper Ordovician shale interval in Ohio: Ohio Department of Natural Re- sources, Division of Geological Survey map, scale 1:2,000,000, accessed December 18, 2015, <http:// geosurvey.ohiodnr.gov/portals/geosurvey/Energy/ Utica/Ordov-Shale_Ro-Average_03-2013.pdf>. Owen, L.B., Holland, M.T., Strawn, J.A., Schrauf, T.W., DiBona, B.G., Sitler, G., and Truman, R.B., 1985, Devonian shale exploration-production stud- ies—Southeast Ohio data book, Jackson/Vinton counties: Gas Research Institute report per Contract No. 5083-213-0874, 235 p., 5 appendices. Peters, K.E., 1986, Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rocks using programmed pyrolysis: AAPG Bulletin, v. 70, no. 3, p. 318–329. Peters, K.E., and Cassa, M.R., 1994, Applied source rock geochemistry, in Magoon, L.B., and Dow, W.G., eds., The petroleum system—From source to trap: AAPG Memoir 60, p. 93–120. Potter, P.E., Maynard, J.B., and Pryor, W.A., 1981, Sedimentology of gas-bearing Devonian shales of the Appalachian Basin: University of Cincinnati, H.N. Fisk Laboratory of Sedimentology, 20 p. Potter, P.E., Maynard, J.B., and Pryor, W.A., 1982, Ap- palachian gas bearing Devonian shales—statements and discussions: Oil and Gas journal, v. 80, no. 4, p. 290–302. Price, L.C., and Barker, C.E., 1985, Suppression of vitrinite reflectance in amorphous rich kerogen—A major unrecognized problem: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 8, p. 59–84. Repetski, J.E., Ryder, R.T., Weary, D.J., Harris, A.G., and Trippi, M.H., 2008, Thermal maturity patterns (CAI and %Ro ) in Upper Ordovician and Devonian rocks of the Appalachian basin—A major revision of USGS Map I–917–E using new subsurface collec- tions: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investiga- tions Map 3006. Repetski, J.E., Ryder, R.T., Weary, D.J., Harris, A.G., and Trippi, M.H., 2014, Thermal maturity pat- terns (conodont color alteration index and vitrinite reflectance) in Upper Ordovician and Devonian rocks of the Appalachian basin—A major revision of USGS Map I–917–E using new subsurface collec- tions, chap. F.1 of Ruppert, L.F., and Ryder, R.T., eds., Coal and petroleum resources in the Appala-
  • 21. 17 chian basin; Distribution, geologic framework, and geochemical character: U.S. Geological Survey Pro- fessional Paper 1708, 27 p., 11 oversized figures, ac- cessed at <http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/pp1708F.1>. Rich, J.L., 1951, Probable fondo origin of Marcellus- Ohio-New Albany-Chattanooga bituminous shales: AAPG Bulletin, v. 47, no. 8, p. 2017–2040. Riley, R.A., Baranoski, M.T., and Wickstrom, L.H., 2004, Oil and gas fields map of Ohio: Ohio Depart- ment of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Map PG-1, scale 1:500,000. Roen, J.B., and Kepferle, R.C., eds., 1993, Petroleum geology of the Devonian and Mississippian black shale of eastern North America: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1909, 13 pls. Rowan, E.L., 2006, Burial and thermal history of the central Appalachian Basin, based on three 2-D models of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1019, 35 p. Ryder, R.T., Hackley, P.C., Alimi, Hossein, and Trippi, M.H., 2013, Evaluation of thermal maturity in the low maturity Devonian shales of the northern Appalachian Basin: AAPG Search and Discovery Article No. 10477, 67 p., 6 appendices. U.S. DOE, 2007, Western U.S. gas sands, secondary gas recovery, eastern U.S. gas shales, methane hy- drates, deep source gas, general UGR, and methane gas recovery from coalbeds: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Natural Gas Program Ar- chive, 2 CDs. Wallace, L.G., and Roen, J.B., 1989, Petroleum source rock potential of the Upper Ordovician black shale sequence, northern Appalachian Basin: U.S. Geo- logical Survey Open-File Report 89-488, 66 p. Weil, S.A., Feldkirchner, H.L., Punwani, D.V., and Jana, J.C., 1978, The IGT Hytort™ process for hydrogen retorting of Devonian oil shales, [paper presented at] The Chattanooga Shale Conference, Oak Ridge, Tenn., November 14, 1978: Institute of Gas Technology, 34 p. Wickstrom, L. H., Venteris, E. R., Harper, J. A., and 26 other authors, 2005, Characterization of geologic sequestration opportunities in the MRCSP region: Final report under DOE cooperative agreement no. DE-PS26-05NT42255, 152 p.
  • 22. 18 API  NO. PERM  NO. CORE  # CUTTING  # COUNTY   NAME SOURCE  OF  DATA COMPANY  NAME MAX   TOC  (%) MAX   %RO   MAX  S1                             (mg  HC/g   of  rock) MAX  S2                               (mg  HC/g  of   rock) MAX   CAI 4701100537 537 NA NA Cabell Repetski  and  others  (2008) Cyclops  Corp. 1.5 4705100221 221 NA NA Marshall Repetski  and  others  (2008) Allied  Chemicals 2 4705300069 69 NA NA Mason Repetski  and  others  (2008) United  Fuel  Gas 1.5 4710700756 756 NA NA Wood Repetski  and  others  (2008) Exxon  Co. 2 34001600130000 60013 2718 Adams ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 14.44 34001600140000 60014 2719 Adams ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.71 34005230410000 23041 3461 Ashland ODGS  core  records Deep  Resources  Llc 5.51 0.616 1.2 19.51 34007200030000 20003 68 Ashtabula ODGS  core  records Magnolia  Pet.  Co. 4 0.61 13.05 34007200150000 20015 440 Ashtabula ODGS  core  records Benedum  -­‐  Trees  Oil  Co. 7.36 1.72 35.26 34007200280000 20028 2008 Ashtabula ODGS  core  records Platco  Corp. 7.08 1.79 33.96 34007200960000 20096 846 Ashtabula ODGS  core  records Lenox  Truck  &  Dozer 6.63 1.47 29.5 34007200990000 20099 850 Ashtabula ODGS  core  records Northern  Natural  Gas  Prod.  Co. 6.15 1.98 22.05 34007202130000 20213 2238 Ashtabula Unpublished  USGS  data Petrox,  Inc. 1.28 0.81 2.51 34007202660000 20266 2306 Ashtabula ODGS  core  records Dietrich  Philip  H. 7.29 2.58 32.12 34007205240000 20524 2933 Ashtabula Unpublished  USGS  data Petrox,  Inc. 1.47 0.66 3.34 34007210870000 21087 2839 Ashtabula ODGS  core  records Bessemer  &  Lake  Erie  Rr 13.01 0.49 34007210870000 21087 2839 Ashtabula Repetski  and  others  (2008) Bessemer  &  Lake  Erie  Rr 7.89 0.59 2.98 28.76 1.5 34009217690000 21769 3095 Athens ODGS  core  records Premier  Energy  Corp. 3.54 0.72 1.37 16.43 34009219160000 21916 3727 Athens ODGS  core  records Partners  Oil  Co. 3.64 0.64 2.48 33.11 34009219630000 21963 3738 Athens ODGS  core  records Marshall  Reba  M. 3.69 0.7 2.43 13.61 34009229690000 22969 4961 Athens ODGS  core  records Atha  Edward  E. 1.87 0.634 0.21 2.07 34013201290000 20129 166 Belmont ODGS  core  records Texas  Co. 8.73 3.09 10.87 34013202770000 20277 2842 Belmont Repetski  and  others  (2008) Columbia  Gas  Transmission 5.97 1.04 3.58 3.62 34013202790000 20279 3473 Belmont Unpublished  USGS  data Ky.  Crude  Oil  &  Gas  Co.  Inc. 0.47 0.2 0.49 34019208350000 20835 2845 Carroll ODGS  core  records Petrox,  Inc. 6.33 34029201520000 20152 227 Columbiana ODGS  core  records Dominion  East  Ohio 4.4 1.66 9.99 34029206000000 20600 2279 Columbiana ODGS  core  records Pin  Oak  Petroleum  Inc. 3.57 1.95 13.41 34029206040000 20604 2247 Columbiana ODGS  core  records Tri-­‐State  Producing  Co. 5.43 1.86 7.35 34029206070000 20607 2246 Columbiana ODGS  core  records Pin  Oak  Petroleum  Inc. 5.31 2.39 11.21 34029206560000 20656 2411 Columbiana ODGS  core  records Statewide  Oil  &  Gas  Co. 4.45 2.76 9.59 34031212740000 21274 795 Coshocton ODGS  core  records W.H.  Bears 2.94 0.66 13.36 34031220950000 22095 2790 Coshocton ODGS  core  records Samples,  James  F. 3.82 1.02 20.3 34031221390000 22139 2953 Coshocton Repetski  and  others  (2008) Columbia  Gas  Transmission 2.27 0.42 1.17 8.24 1.5 34031224600000 22460 3252 Coshocton ODGS  core  records Redman  Oil  Co. 7.42 2.54 36.51 34031225700000 22570 3379 Coshocton ODGS  core  records Cyclops  Corp. 3.39 1.26 15.89 34031260030000 26003 3903 Coshocton Unpublished  USGS  data Rhdk  Oil  &  Gas  Llc/Dba  Red  Hil 3.59 1.98 14.94 34033600410000 60041 2722 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.38 34033600420000 60042 2723 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.19 34033600440000 60044 2725 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.34 34033600450000 60045 2726 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.11 34033600460000 60046 2727 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.53 34033600470000 60047 2728 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.86 34033600480000 60048 2729 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.31 34033600490000 60049 2730 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.54 34033600500000 60050 2731 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.48 34033600510000 60051 2732 Crawford ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.72 34035200570000 20057 60 Cuyahoga ODGS  core  records Benedum-­‐Trees  Co. 5.18 1.47 20.72 34041600120000 60012 2648 Delaware Repetski  and  others  (2008) Ohio  Div.  Of  Geological  Survey 8.82 0.35 1.96 41.7 34041600130000 60013 2736 Delaware ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.85 34041600140000 60014 2737 Delaware ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.6 34043200050000 20005 734 Erie Repetski  and  others  (2008) Nickel  Plate  Development  Co. 5.8 0.45 1.44 25.85 34045202340000 20234 636 Fairfield Repetski  and  others  (2008) C.  A.  Davis  Drg.  Contractor 5.95 0.44 3.03 29.01 34045617000000 61700 2740 Fairfield ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.83 34045617000000 61700 2740 Fairfield Repetski  and  others  (2008) Phillips  Pet  Co. 4.92 0.41 0.52 17.96 34049600040000 60004 859 Franklin Repetski  and  others  (2008) Andrix 7.32 0.44 2.04 36.31 1.5 34051600250000 60025 2744 Fulton ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.7 34051600280000 60028 2747 Fulton ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.72 34051600290000 60029 2748 Fulton ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 9.65 34053204740000 20474 2874 Gallia ODGS  core  records Mitchell  Energy  Corp. 9.65 0.51 34053204770000 20477 2871 Gallia ODGS  core  records Mitchell  Energy  Corp. 9.53 0.61 34053204770000 20477 2871 Gallia ODGS  core  records Mitchell  Energy  Corp. 7.7 0.54 4.74 39.68 34053204770000 20477 2871 Gallia ODGS  core  records Mitchell  Energy  Corp. 7.68 0.61 3.38 38.71 34053204780000 20478 2875 Gallia ODGS  core  records Mitchell  Energy  Corp. 9.55 0.59 34053204790000 20479 2872 Gallia ODGS  core  records Mitchell  Energy  Corp. 9.05 0.55 34053204800000 20480 3557 Gallia ODGS  core  records Energy  Search  Inc. 4 0.72 1.37 18.93 34053204820000 20482 2873 Gallia ODGS  core  records Mitchell  Energy  Corp. 11.79 0.64 34053204820000 20482 2873 Gallia Repetski  and  others  (2008) Mitchell  Energy  Corp. 2.49 0.47 0.46 7.59 34053207690000 20769 3654 Gallia ODGS  core  records Elgin  Service  Center  Inc. 3.92 0.78 1.64 20.02 34053207690000 20769 3654 Gallia Unpublished  USGS  data Elgin  Service  Center  Inc. 2.46 1.33 9.36 34053209970000 20997 3695 Gallia ODGS  core  records Continental  Resources  Inc. 11.3 0.796 5.63 73.74 34055200020000 20002 193 Geauga ODGS  core  records Benedum  Trees  Oil  Co. 4.77 0.95 15.55 34055200200000 20020 2392 Geauga ODGS  core  records Twm  Petrolwum  Inc. 7.11 1.14 19.13 34059207990000 20799 7 Guernsey Repetski  and  others  (2008) Well  Supervision  Inc. 2.92 0.45 0.69 7.47 34059223890000 22389 3703 Guernsey Unpublished  USGS  data Kenoil 1.1 0.62 2.07 34059226450000 22645 3763 Guernsey ODGS  core  records Eastland  Energy  Group  Inc. 4.35 0.72 1.96 11.36 34059227340000 22734 3868 Guernsey Unpublished  USGS  data Artex  Oil  Company 3.59 2.2 12.81 34067201030000 20103 2287 Harrison Unpublished  USGS  data Moore  Jerry  Inc. 0.8 0.35 0.79 34067201040000 20104 2389 Harrison ODGS  core  records Amerada  Hess  Corp. 2.85 1.05 6.08 34067203450000 20345 3709 Harrison ODGS  core  records Sound  Energy  Co.  Inc. 0.88 34067203550000 20355 3735 Harrison ODGS  core  records Exco  -­‐  North  Coast  Energy  Inc. 3.62 1.28 2.22 5.25 34069600740000 60074 2749 Henry ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.74 34069600760000 60076 2751 Henry ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.95 34069600780000 60078 2753 Henry ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.22 TABLE A-1. List of wells and data used for mapping source rock potential and thermal maturity in eastern Ohio. APPENDIX
  • 23. 19 API  NO. PERM  NO. CORE  # CUTTING  # COUNTY   NAME SOURCE  OF  DATA COMPANY  NAME MAX   TOC  (%) MAX   %RO   MAX  S1                             (mg  HC/g   of  rock) MAX  S2                               (mg  HC/g  of   rock) MAX   CAI 34073204970000 20497 679 Hocking Repetski  and  others  (2008) Barton  A.  Holl 5.22 0.39 2.51 25.91 34073206110000 20611 738 Hocking Repetski  and  others  (2008) Kewanee  Oil  Co. 1+ 34075207290000 20729 662 Holmes ODGS  core  records Pan-­‐Ohio  Oil  &  Gas  Co. 5.07 0.94 18.87 34075214090000 21409 2412 Holmes ODGS  core  records Pin  Oak  Petroleum  Inc. 7.73 2.25 44.4 34075216090000 21609 2911 Holmes ODGS  core  records Raber,  Aden  B. 3.97 2.88 14.12 34077200700000 20070 1980 Huron Unpublished  USGS  data Glynn  Trolz  &  Assoc.  Inc. 3.92 0.75 19.27 34077201440000 20144 2823 Huron Repetski  and  others  (2008) D.  L.  Woody  Inc. 1+ 34077600240000 60024 2757 Huron ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.3 34079201020000 20102 3465 Jackson ODGS  core  records Artex  Oil  Company 8.19 0.72 2.17 44.34 34079201680000 20168 NA NA Jackson ODGS  core  records Cgas  Exploration 8 0.51 8.06 41.98 34081203400000 20340 1060 Jefferson ODGS  core  records Lake  Shore  Pipeline  Co. 4.3 1.98 4.25 34081204120000 20412 3747 Jefferson ODGS  core  records Exco  -­‐  North  Coast  Energy  Inc. 3.35 1.34 1.55 2.88 34081204120000 20412 3747 Jefferson Unpublished  USGS  data Exco  -­‐  North  Coast  Energy  Inc. 0.87 0.33 0.7 34083225990000 22599 2900 Knox ODGS  core  records Maram  Energy  Co. 7.63 0.76 34083225990000 22599 2900 Knox Repetski  and  others  (2008) Maram  Energy  Co. 7.2 0.63 4.74 39.13 1+ 34085200170000 20017 855 Lake Repetski  and  others  (2008) Morton  Salt  Co. 6.67 0.46 4.61 31.7 1.5 34085201420000 20142 2509 Lake Unpublished  USGS  data Ici  Americas  Inc. 2.7 1.33 8.86 34085202210000 20221 3453 Lake ODGS  core  records Lubrizol  Corp. 1.47 34087202570000 20257 3609 Lawrence Unpublished  USGS  data Petro  Quest  Inc. 2.29 1 7.27 34087202580000 20258 3721 Lawrence ODGS  core  records Petro  Quest  Inc. 4.93 0.69 2.62 24.16 34089233410000 23341 3755 Licking ODGS  core  records Brown  Phillip  H.  Jr.  Corporation 8.79 0.67 2.82 31.52 34089234990000 23499 3707 Licking ODGS  core  records Enervest  Operating  Llc. 6.64 0.59 3.31 20.74 34093211000000 21100 2909 Lorain ODGS  core  records Columbia  Gas  Transmission 11.66 0.75 34093211000000 21100 2909 Lorain Repetski  and  others  (2008) Columbia  Gas  Transmission 5.66 0.36 2.74 24.14 34093605050000 60505 2762 Lorain ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 8.56 34093605060000 60506 2763 Lorain ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 8.46 34099200200000 20020 63 Mahoning ODGS  core  records Magnolia  Petroleum 4.43 1.09 9.87 34099201790000 20179 1016 Mahoning ODGS  core  records Bocor  Holdings,  Llc/Bocor  Prod. 3.73 1.43 13.83 34099211890000 21189 3748 Mahoning Unpublished  USGS  data H  &  W  Energy 2.68 0.97 8.23 34101600290000 60029 2766 Marion   ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.09 34101600310000 60031 2768 Marion   ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 14.01 34103211430000 21143 819 Medina Unpublished  USGS  data Bocor  Holdings,  Llc/Bocor  Prod. 3 1.51 8.46 34105213130000 21313 827 Meigs ODGS  core  records The  Ohio  Fuel  Gas  Co. 4.94 0.79 1.77 18.15 34105214220000 21422 2249 Meigs ODGS  core  records Jadoil  Inc.  D.  Vernau 1.48 34105220580000 22058 2921 Meigs ODGS  core  records Columbia  Gas  Transmission 6.34 0.78 3.95 27.28 34105220580000 22058 2921 Meigs ODGS  core  records Columbia  Gas  Transmission 2.88 0.59 0.35 11.15 34105220580000 22058 2921 Meigs ODGS  core  records Columbia  Gas  Transmission 5.7 0.73 34105220580000 22058 2921 Meigs Repetski  and  others  (2008) Columbia  Gas  Transmission 5.52 0.48 4.34 21.68 34105224990000 22499 2922 Meigs Unpublished  USGS  data Columbia  Gas  Transmission 0.57 0.97 0.84 34111203450000 20345 NA NA Monroe ODGS  core  records Miley  Gas  Company 2.21 1.33 5.51 34111218810000 21881 3714 Monroe ODGS  core  records Buckeye  Oil  Producing  Co. 1.53 0.82 0.44 1.33 34115217720000 21772 3731 Morgan ODGS  core  records Inland  Drilling  Co  Inc. 4.05 0.62 2.14 14.85 34115217720000 21772 3731 Morgan Unpublished  USGS  data Inland  Drilling  Co  Inc. 2.39 1.07 6.06 34115235700000 23570 3848 Morgan Unpublished  USGS  data Hanna  M.  A.  Co. 1.25 0.64 2.59 34115237590000 23759 4964 Morgan ODGS  core  records Smith  Ronald  Dba  Chipco 1.64 0.37 2.82 34117600380000 60038 2769 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.81 34117600390000 60039 2770 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.11 34117600390000 60037 2770 Morrow Repetski  and  others  (2008) Phillips  Pet  Co. 9.92 0.43 4.41 55.69 1+ 34117600410000 60041 2772 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.18 34117600420000 60042 2773 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 14.25 34117600430000 60043 2775 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.42 34117600440000 60044 2776 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.35 34117600450000 60045 2777 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 14.37 34117600460000 60046 2778 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.81 34117600480000 60048 2780 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.33 34117600540000 60054 2786 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.18 34117600550000 60055 2787 Morrow ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.47 34119201460000 20146 65 Muskingum ODGS  core  records E.  M.  Shields 4.42 0.53 11.56 34119216170000 21617 799 Muskingum Repetski  and  others  (2008) Barco  Corporation 4.02 0.43 2.18 18.4 34119219500000 21950 2128 Muskingum ODGS  core  records Sidwell,  Cris  D. 3.68 0.96 20.85 34119252500000 25250 3767 Muskingum ODGS  core  records Cgas  Exploration 5.64 0.55 2.34 20.41 34119252500000 25250 3767 Muskingum Unpublished  USGS  data Cgas  Exploration 3.64 1.3 18.05 34121206580000 20658 385 Noble ODGS  core  records H.  Rey.  Halvenston 9 2.36 11.79 34121213120000 21312 2292 Noble ODGS  core  records Waite,  James  D. 3.02 0.79 5.57 34121221000000 22100 3723 Noble Unpublished  USGS  data Zilkha  Energy  Inc. 1.24 0.42 1.6 34121221130000 22113 3734 Noble ODGS  core  records Green  Gas  Co 3.64 0.98 2.21 9.27 34121222550000 22255 2936 Noble ODGS  core  records Stonebridge  Operating  Co. 12.63 1.16 6.51 28.65 34121222550000 22255 2936 Noble ODGS  core  records Stonebridge  Operating  Co. 11.35 34121222550000 22255 2936 Noble Repetski  and  others  (2008) Stonebridge  Operating  Co. 7.03 1.01 4.5 17.72 1+ 34127223800000 22380 1573 Perry Repetski  and  others  (2008) Kentucky  Drilling  &  Operating  Corp. 4.56 0.46 2.21 22.34 34127228550000 22855 2290 Perry Repetski  and  others  (2008) Kentucky  Drlg.  &  Operating  Corp. 1.5 34129600030000 60003 2788 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.38 34129600030000 60003 2788 Pickaway Repetski  and  others  (2008) Phillips  Pet  Co. 10.54 0.42 2.05 43.56 34129600050000 60005 2790 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 8.86 34129600060000 60006 2791 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.92 34129600070000 60007 2792 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.88 34129600080000 60008 2794 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 9.95 34129600090000 60009 2796 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.08 34129600100000 60010 2797 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.06 34129600110000 60011 2799 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.87 34129600120000 60012 2800 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 11.21 34129600130000 60013 2801 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.63 34129600140000 60014 2802 Pickaway ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 10.8
  • 24. 20 API  NO. PERM  NO. CORE  # CUTTING  # COUNTY   NAME SOURCE  OF  DATA COMPANY  NAME MAX   TOC  (%) MAX   %RO   MAX  S1                             (mg  HC/g   of  rock) MAX  S2                               (mg  HC/g  of   rock) MAX   CAI 34131200220000 20022 2946 Pike   Repetski  and  others  (2008) Karl  Wehmeyer  &  Co. 1+ 34131600600000 60060 2803 Pike   ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 18.26 34131600610000 60061 2804 Pike   ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 12.62 34131600610000 60061 2804 Pike   Repetski  and  others  (2008) Phillips  Pet  Co. 7.2 0.42 1.71 34.4 34131600620000 60062 2805 Pike   ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.3 34131600630000 60063 2806 Pike   ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.77 34133200020000 20002 242 Portage ODGS  core  records J.  W.  Cashdollar 5.37 1.96 20.74 34133205180000 20518 3092 Portage ODGS  core  records Enervest  Operating  Llc. 5.19 2.37 21.22 34139205230000 20523 2949 Richland Repetski  and  others  (2008) Fry,  Andrew  M. 7.27 0.43 1.94 33.39 34139205270000 20527 2955 Richland Repetski  and  others  (2008) Bates,  Lew  Jr. 8.08 0.43 5.23 41.17 34141600060000 60006 562 Ross Repetski  and  others  (2008) OSU  Engineering 4.43 0.4 1.2 20.96 34141600250000 60025 2807 Ross ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 14.23 34141600260000 60026 2808 Ross ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.57 34145201930000 20193 2959 Scioto ODGS  core  records Continental  Oil  Co. 8.28 0.57 1.98 29.31 34145202120000 20212 2161 Scioto ODGS  core  records Aristech  Chemical  Corp. 6.07 0.7 1.81 30.38 34145601410000 60141 3409 Scioto Unpublished  USGS  data Aristech  Chemical  Corp. 8.64 4.93 55.89 34145601450000 60145 2813 Scioto ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 21.08 34145601460000 60146 2814 Scioto ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 16.58 34145601460000 60146 2814 Scioto Repetski  and  others  (2008) Phillips  Pet  Co. 9.57 0.33 4.03 51.04 34145601470000 60147 2815 Scioto ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.55 34145601490000 60149 2816 Scioto ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 14.15 34145601530000 60153 2817 Scioto ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 13.46 34145601540000 60154 2818 Scioto ODGS  core  records N.  American  Exploration,  Inc. 14.41 34151228270000 22827 3704 Stark Unpublished  USGS  data Miller,  William  S.  Inc. 1.9 0.79 5.03 34153604170000 60417 510 Summit Repetski  and  others  (2008) Pittsburgh  Plate  Glass  Co.  Columbia  Chem.  Div. 9.21 0.48 4.76 39.42 1.5 34155212380000 21238 2962 Trumbull Repetski  and  others  (2008) Columbia  Gas  Transmission 8.44 0.42 5.67 37.02 1.5 34157200040000 20004 41 Tuscarawas ODGS  core  records O.  F.  G. 3.6 1.15 10.34 34157200660000 20066 209 Tuscarawas Repetski  and  others  (2008) Brendel  Prod.  Co. 2.58 0.44 0.85 8.93 34157201010000 20101 308 Tuscarawas ODGS  core  records Columbian  Carbon  Co. 1.77 0.43 6.56 34157207880000 20788 820 Tuscarawas ODGS  core  records Dr.  Thos.  Christopher 5.33 1.65 15.88 34157210360000 21036 2071 Tuscarawas ODGS  core  records Eclipse  Resources-­‐Ohio  Llc. 2.57 0.8 7.48 34157211610000 21161 2337 Tuscarawas ODGS  core  records Tipka  Energy  Devlopment  Co. 2.42 1.11 8.87 34157216610000 21661 2810 Tuscarawas ODGS  core  records Welling  John 3.44 1.14 12.27 34157233200000 23320 3733 Tuscarawas Unpublished  USGS  data Enervest  Operating  Llc. 1.13 0.37 2.11 34163203310000 20331 2015 Vinton ODGS  core  records Doyle  Baird 5.32 1.32 26.1 34163203690000 20369 2508 Vinton ODGS  core  records Quaker  State  Oil  Ref  Corp. 6.93 0.62 1.81 30.04 34163205570000 20557 NA NA Vinton ODGS  core  records Donald  Byers  Oil  &  Gas  Llc. 9.92 0.48 4.45 67.91 34163206190000 20619 NA NA Vinton ODGS  core  records Donald  Byers  Oil  &  Gas  Llc. 12.65 0.46 5.9 65.26 34163206540000 20654 NA NA Vinton ODGS  core  records Trainer,  Everett  C. 18.37 0.49 7.35 115.04 34167203030000 20303 481 Washington ODGS  core  records Columbian  Carbon  Co.  &  Joe  Rubin 4.7 1.66 9.28 34167215150000 21515 506 Washington ODGS  core  records Ohio  Fuel  Gas  Co. 6.08 2.02 12.09 34167216980000 21698 2734 Washington ODGS  core  records B.H.  Putnam 2.39 1.12 5.91 34167217000000 21700 2732 Washington ODGS  core  records B.H.  Putnam 5.98 2.39 13.56 34167231000000 23100 2382 Washington ODGS  core  records Amerada  Petroleum  Corp. 3.55 0.81 4.08 34167233060000 23306 2500 Washington ODGS  core  records Whipple  Run  Oil  &  Gas  Co. 2.54 1.38 4.3 34167235210000 23521 2966 Washington ODGS  core  records Indian  Hills  Resources  Llc. 4.85 0.868 3.05 14.56 34167235210000 23521 2966 Washington ODGS  core  records Indian  Hills  Resources  Llc. 2.71 0.77 2.2 6.75 34167235210000 23521 2966 Washington Repetski  and  others  (2008) Indian  Hills  Resources  Llc. 2.93 0.92 2.44 11.09 34167252410000 25241 3760 Washington ODGS  core  records Triad  Hunter    Llc. 3.86 1.06 2.32 5.79 34169215640000 21564 2252 Wayne ODGS  core  records Wenner  Petroleum  Corp. 1.66 0.33 3.7
  • 25. Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Geological Survey 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. C-1 Columbus, OH 43229-6693 Telephone: (614) 265-6595 Fax: (614) 447-1918
  • 26. 3404120123 CLIFTON LEWIS PAUL EVART TD=3231 ft 985 m 13.6 mi 21.8 km 3408921981 LAKE SHORE PIPELINE GRANVILLE S. & H.M.DROKE TD=4505 ft 1373 m 20.6 mi 33.1 km 3408922581 HUNTING OIL CO. DOYLE WOLFORD TD=2990 ft 911 m 29.3 mi 47.2 km 3411926771 RPJ ENERGY FUND MGMT.INC. SMITH TD=4771 ft 1454 m 11.3 mi 18.2 km 3412123096 CAVENDISH PETRO.OF OH.INC OHIO POWER CO. TD=5541 ft 1689 m 4.1 mi 6.6 km 3412121744 CARTER-JONES LUMBER CO. DON E. PARRISH TD=5779 ft 1761 m 7.1 mi 11.4 km 3412123199 BENATTY CORP. OHIO POWER CO. TD=6221 ft 1896 m 10.7 mi 17.2 km 3416725241 ARAPAHO VENTURES OF NY INC DAVID L. REYNOLDS TD=6678 ft 2035 m 14.4 mi 23.2 km 4707300667 COMMONWEALTH NATURAL KERNS 1 TD=6862 ft 2092 m Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity NEUT 0 8000NAPI 100 200 300 400 500 600 Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity NEUT 0 4000 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity RHOB 2.000 3.000G/C3 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity NPHI 0.3 -0.1V/V RHOB 2.000 3.000G/C3 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity NPHI 0.3 -0.1V/V RHOB 2.000 3.000G/C3 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity NPHI 0.3 -0.1V/V DPHI 0.3 -0.1V/V 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity NPHI 0.3 -0.1V/V RHOB 2.000 3.000G/C3 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity NPHI 30 - 10none 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 Correlation GR 0 200GAPI Depth TVD Porosity NEUT 0 1200NAPI 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4400 4500 Cleveland Sh Mbr Bedford Sh upper Huron Sh Mbr Chagrin Sh Mbr middle Huron Sh Mbr lower Huron Sh Mbr Ohio Sh Hanover Sh Mbr Angola Sh Mbr Onondaga Ls Pipe Creek Sh Mbr Hamilton Gp Marcellus Sh Sunbury Sh Berea Ss Upper Devonian und Chagrin Sh Mbr lower Huron Sh Mbr Hanover Sh Mbr Pipe Creek Sh Mbr Angola Sh Mbr Rhinestreet Sh Mbr Rhinestreet Sh Mbr Cashaqua Sh Mbr Middlesex Sh Mbr Geneseo Sh Mbr Marcellus Sh Onondaga Ls Geologic Unit Java Fm W est Falls Fm System/ Series UPPERDEVONIAN MIDDLE DEVONIAN Geologic Unit Ohio Sh Java Fm West Falls Fm Sonyea Fm Genesee Fm System/ Series ??? Hamilton Gp West River Sh Mbr WVOH Location of cross section line and Ohio Shale outcrop. Angola Sh Mbr Hanover Sh M br low er Huron Sh M br BedfordSh SunburySh upper Huron Sh M br Cleveland Sh M br BereaSs Cuyahoga Fm m iddle Huron Sh M br A A' Unit abbreviations: Fm = Formation, Gp = Group, Ls = Limestone, Mbr = Member, Sh = Shale, Ss = Sandstone, und= undifferentiated. MISSISS- IPPIAN UPPER DEVONIAN MIDDLE DEVONIAN Lawrence Adams Pike Meigs Jackson Brown Clermont Highland Vinton Ross Athens Warren Hocking Morgan Pickaway Monroe Perry Montgomery Preble Madison Muskingum Belmont Guernsey ChampaignDarke Harrison Shelby Logan Knox Tuscarawas Auglaize MorrowMercer Hardin WayneWyandot Ashland Lorain Mahoning Hancock Putnam SenecaPaulding Van Wert Allen Medina Huron Summit Trumbull Portage ErieHenry SanduskyWood Cuyahoga Geauga Fulton Lucas Lake Ottowa Williams Defiance Miami Union Clark Butler Greene Clinton Fayette Hamilton Gallia Scioto Fairfield Licking Coshocton Holmes Marion Delaware Franklin Richland Stark Washinton Noble Jefferson Carroll Columbiana Ashtabula M I L A K E E R I E PA A A' W V IN K Y 0 4300 PLATE 1. Regional stratigraphic cross section illustrating the Middle and Upper Devonian interval from Delaware County, Ohio, to Pleasants County, West Virginia.