Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.
Próximo SlideShare
Ipcrf
Ipcrf
Cargando en…3
×
1 de 22

IPCRF presentation

19

Compartir

Descargar para leer sin conexión

Libros relacionados

Gratis con una prueba de 30 días de Scribd

Ver todo

Audiolibros relacionados

Gratis con una prueba de 30 días de Scribd

Ver todo

IPCRF presentation

  1. 1. IPCRF Preparation Mariches E. Begino SHT 1
  2. 2. What should be considered? Objectives should be SMART Specific Is the result achievable?  Can a supervisor verify the result? What would be the result look like?
  3. 3. Measurable Quantity  Quality Time Cost Effectiveness
  4. 4. Achievable Is the objective achievable in the available resource of time? Is the work within the individual control or view?  Is the objective appropriate to the individual experience skill and work level? Is it appropriate within a job description?
  5. 5. Relevant Employees Job Ratee’s Objective  Unit Objective Organization Objective
  6. 6. Time Bound Within an specific measure of time frame
  7. 7. Example: By ________/________/_________(When, Who? What? Include a number you can measure)will have ___________(How? Why? Remember to specify results using QET Criteria)
  8. 8. Remember: If QET is hard to be done, then there is a problem with the objective ( Not SMART) 3 objectives per KRA Turn generic into specific Presence of at least 2 measure per objective
  9. 9. QET: Quantity – Raw Numbers, Percentages Quality – e.g. Accuracy, Effectiveness Efficiency- (e.g., pesos/money saved, time saved) Timeliness- (e.g., within 3 months)
  10. 10. Remember: IPCRF is just like making LP Objective must start with the verb last is time If the focus is person, use number not % Do not shortcut
  11. 11. CCompetency
  12. 12. Lets Examine: (What is missing?)
  13. 13. Community Involvement  Objective  Prepared and submitted complete 160 DLL within the scheduled date of checking.  Quality 5- Prepared and submitted 160 DLL 4- Prepared and submitted 150-159 DLL 3- Prepared and submitted 130-149 DLL 2- Prepared and submitted 120-129 DLL 1- Prepared and submitted 119 DLL and below.  Efficiency  Timeliness 5- Submitted DLL on scheduled time. 4- Submitted DLL One (1) day late from scheduled checking. 3- Submitted DLL Two (2) days late from scheduled checking. 2- Submitted DLL Three (3) days late from scheduled checking 1- Submitted DLL Four (4) and more days late from scheduled checkin.g
  14. 14. Community Involvement  Objective  Conducted six (6) general /parents assembly meeting with 75% parents attendance within the scheduled date.  Quality 5-conducted 6 GA meetings 4-conducted 5 GA meetings 3- conducted 4 GA meetings 2-conducted 3 GA meetings 1- conducted 1 or 2 GA meetings  Efficiency 5- conducted meetings /assemblies with 75% parents attendance. 4- with 70% to 74.99 % parents attendance. 3- with 65 % to 69.99 % parents attendance. 2- with 60 % to 64.99 % parents attendance. 1- with 5 0 % and below parents attendance.  Timeliness 5-Conducted Meetings on scheduled time. 4- Conducted meeting One (1) day late from the schedule date. 3-Conducted meeting Two (2) days late from the schedule date. 2- Conducted meeting Three (3) days late from the schedule date. 1- Conducted meeting Four (4) and more days late from schedule date.
  15. 15. SDO Cam. Norte Non Negotiables  Teaching Learning (40%)  DLL Preparation (20%)  Competencies (10%)  Pupils’ Outcome (30%)  NAT Target (10%)  Drop out Rate (10%)  Community Involvement (15%)  6 Gen. Assembly meeting (5%)  Community Involvement (15%) Plus Factor used for IPCRF can not be used in promotion

×