Comments on Glass Big Push II & III.pdf

GLASS BIG PUSH
Architectural Instances and Remote Building
MDIA
V3 Glass Package
V2 Synergy Modifications
V1 Map Testing
Glass
System
Ark/Digital
Plan
Startups
Build
Requirements
Infra-
structure
10/10/2023 1
Part II:
Impact on Simulations Model
See
this!
Part III: Mitigation and Outcomes Here
also!
1

Summary of Comments on Glass Big Push
Page: 1
Number: 1 Author: Presenter Notes Subject: Presentation Notes Date: 10/10/2023 2:11:29 PM
Part I of Glass Big Push: Pillars and Pipes, Portals and Plaits and Columns and Beams in Architectural Instances and Remote Building are broadly discussed,
in order to see glass system capability (shown separately). In Part II we prepare metrics for the simulation model from our testing, and we also prepare
cases for mitigation of conditions to prevent the project from encountering backsliding results during the crossover period of the project. Also, conditions
likely to occur in every phase are studied. In Part III: we prepare cases for Mitigation and Outcomes, to be defined in task order in our next paper.

Testing Theory
PIPES AND MAPPING STREAM-LINE BRANCH
V3 Glass Package
V1 Map Testing
• Walking through the Multiform
delivery to instances and fully
Assimilated Glass Process
10/10/2023 Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 2
Moving into the Partnering capability what
do changes in the performance of tasks do
comparatively to the Simulations Model and
how does our team benefit?
Architectural Instances and Remote Building
Portals will change the
outcome
Pipes are the first
Streamline lesson
Stars to Branch and facilitate
the glass table and modeling
design for simulations
1

Page: 2
As we build up Intellectual Properties the team is able to participate in management benefits from team and individual performance metrics related to
the profit-sharing plan. By taking on more responsibility in the partnering plan individuals may receive highly visible roles in making judgement calls
based on years of delivering certifiable experience. We want to ensure with our compliance theory of mitigation of risk that their performance is assured
by a proper and best practices strategy of risk management.

Part II Impact on Simulations
Gate &
Lens
Required
Timing
ϕ
Omega Shift 2 Lens
Model Shift 3 Lens
Lift Shift 4 Lens
“Big Push”, Part I, slide 10
System Convergence
Ω
“Car and Road Test”, Models, Slide 2
Conveyance
What if certain acquired facts
change… how will it affect our
dates? And our Forward results?
47.6
167
Compare Slide 5
“Home and Foundations Test”,
Pipe Assimilations, Slide 14
1

Page: 3
The first part of our paper is spent in delivery of the conformable metrics that should be referenced when performing the task simulation, the mitigation
required in our next paper. In our next paper we will determine if the agile dates recommended to us have changed due to the simulation of various
conditions presented to it. This enables a scope redefinition or a timing of stakeholder and placeholder requirements if need be.

Circumstances to Watch for…
Part II Impact on Simulations
10And they saw the God of
Israel: and there was under his
feet as it were a paved work
of a sapphire stone, and as it
were the body of heaven in
his clearness. Exodus 24:10
■ We’re looking to complete a table of potential
impact items and recommended mitigation
tactics, the likely impact, and how to test for it.
1. Set Parameters
2. Describe Conditions outside of
parameters
3. Actions required
Avoiding Bad Works
Part I Glass Big Push
Can this happen?
Part I,
1

Page: 4
While there is no reason to call upon the Fatima restorative promise here nor reference the Office Space Cult variety of project disintegration, we are
looking in Ark Science to deal with the extreme causes of project motivation that occur and mitigate these circumstances. In Part III we begin to look at
conditions of project delay and insufficiency. We begin to take tactical measures and strategies that will smooth or workover circumstances to negate the
outcomes that prolong the project or encumber its prolific composition. We will complete this work in our next paper, although the normative tests are
supplied in Part III for benchmarking and baselining the mitigation.

Stakeholder Means
BR
The means to
Leverage is the
Branching Capability
FIN
The Energy Star becomes the branching and finishing
aspect of loading production and completing Phase III
applications. The Streamline Warehouse is a star portal
means of conserving Properties.
Phase III
Graphics Slide 17
78.189 -78.383 Phase II Graphic
206.5544-
205.602-
.9524 -
.95589 =
.00349 x2=
.00698 (P+)
ROI curve
Slide 8
slide 16
splice
47.6
Lev
1

Page: 5
Branching and Finishing Operations begin to pickup LIFT commutations for the project and the bigger delivery requirements for lens variegations are
present to it. What is not part of the final scenarios is all the products marketed out of this scientific and technological delivery. Thus, the greater world at
large has much more capability than is expressed in it.

Push Compare
10/10/2023
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall
6
410,599,637 – 410,923,581 = -333,944 GATE/3 = 111,314,667 KEY
Scientific Assets
.47113-.47414884 Fin. Rate = .000301884 x2 =.000603768 e
75.833 2x2 =
151.666 –
151.757 = .91
What do promotions
to the streamline
warehouse mean to
the team? See next
205.602 – 205.61587
= .01387-.0134433
=.0004267 y
Change in
property
arrangements
for Warehouse
association.
Sale of Legacy
Property of
Science Building
TT Fee
Impact
Critical path assoc.
Standard
Financial Rate
*Compare 9.08~ to Trig Table
920-329 =
.00000591
^see slide 4>>
Trig for Table
Whse. Fee>>
Trig for Events
e
Whse. Fee>>Affil. Discount
Whse IP + Conversion
See Part I
Gate
205.602 x 2=
411.204-411.98589=
-.78189
V3 Glass Package
Part I Glass Big Push
At the Height of Push the
Confluent Cloud becomes the
T&M requirement to advance
78.189 compare Phase II Graphic Slide 16
1

Page: 6
Financial comparison to graphic relational tasks and corresponding trig relationships prove very beneficial to outlining the project, as shown in Part I.
Here we add the glass mass equation and perform an evaluation demonstrating a remainder of clock value only.

WAREHOUSE
MANAGEMENT
TEAM
Warehouse Team R & D Team
Virtual products live
in a Virtual Warehouse
New Roles are assigned
What do new Benefits look like?
See next…
1

Page: 7
Explanations of the Product Backlog in comparison with the Sprint Backlog as well as the Scrum-ban combination are helpful to see that the metrics used
are different and that the production-based scrum + kanban combination is helpful to the inventory relationship of delivery. Can the team keep up and
what are the benefits if they do? See next.

Financial
Change in Roles
■ The Team has acquired Pipe Engineering
Roles in a Master Builder Setting, as their
salaries have doubled
■ They have conducted material testing for
industrial physics products for 15+ years
with glass mass packaging knowledge and
the role of pipes in land and building
management.
■ At the granular glass level of production,
they are moving along into glass systems
that conduct business via star-cloud portals.
This type of engineering will become
prevalent in 50 years with cloud fluency
engineering. (This is Post-Forms and Matrix
Alignments.)
■ Notice that second or third generation glass
homes will cost at least half of the new solid
state glass composition. Profit sharing
affords savings contribution towards home.
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 10/10/2023 8
Reg. Earnings
paid out with
administration
time. Profit
sharing
distributive
wages can be
saved towards
home
purchase.
The TT Manager
is training part
time for the
Installer
Business in the
Field. He can
purchase for
$410k down.
Critical Path
ROI curve, slide 5
1

Page: 8
The impact on the project may directly affect this mid-project conclusion because the beginning of the project is more at-risk due to the circumstances of
lack of training or ground conditions that need pre-eminent work. We will put markers into the simulation to assess at-risk areas and their required
response conditions and mitigations. We are looking for best practices not to abridge the timing or the success of these performances at the crossover in
the project.

Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 10/10/2023
9
Using the Trial Mitigation scenario of
Black-Jack Testing create the worst-
case scenario where the wall is
(0,50) and find the normative state or
in-between baseline for normative
changes to occur.
 Using the ANOVA
average of best and
worst to make a
baseline norm and
schedule mitigation
tasks to determine
compliance
requirements
Black-Jack Test
Using our Simulations Model, we will test in the
next paper various impacts of these conditions
and mitigation task routines. Here in Part III, we
Baseline the Project, see next.
1

Page: 9
We will work these conditions into task mitigation routines in our next paper. We have created both the worst case and the best-case scenarios using our
test devised black-jack probability table. This supplied us with the means to take the worst case to a wall vector of (0,50) from its best case (project plan)
position of (14.4,50). Then we applied other metric conditions to create the normative case, see next slide.

Starting Basis
■ The Starting basis of our project is in line with
the ending figures we have derived from it. If
we want to test mitigation techniques, we
should at least derive a benchmark and a
baseline that assists us in origination of the
delivery of tactical applications of resolving
problems.
Early Scorecard Figures
Best Fit Line
1

Page: 10
Here we show the practical outcomes for Best –and- Worst Case Scenarios. We found an early Scorecard Anova that displays the metric case we are now
using rather simply. It is easy to view the interior lines scheduled graphically at the bottom and note that the project in the worst case is operating in the
“hole” because its early process has been disassociated. The Best Case however works entirely in a solvent state of productive conformity to the
requirements set.

Normative Cases
■ We have prepared two normative
cases with which to derive the
baseline of ascending conditions.
It is only the first half of the project
that is at risk, and so we have
focused our primary delivery
consequences on the Phase I and
Phase II processes.
■ In our next paper we will state the
causative and normalization of
processes that will develop the
simulations experience of the
project
Best Fit Line
First Norm
Second Norm
α+
167
Significant
metrics to apply
Compare Slide 4
See Cases in the Next Paper Lift factors, slide 4
NEXT
1

Page: 11
The normative cases were plotted by changing the probability plot in the black-jack test to include all positive outcomes within a customized set of
principles. Using absolute values, averaging and then doubling we created the two scenarios to depict internal ordinances to detect movement with a
different scale of motivation.

The Branch
“Choose you this day whom ye will serve … as for me and my
house, we will serve the Lord” (Joshua 24:15).
Phase III
Glass Cost remainder
Interior Asset Margin / Zero Sum Dividend
Less Time and Motion yield carriage burden
Carriage burden less mid-level burden is build -conv.
Carriage burden less high-level burden is critical path
Comparing critical path shows incumbent form
Finding incumbent form x 2 then div by 3
Branching forms
Branching forms omega
Branching forms
Single Form Margin
High Level Carriage Burden
High Level Carriage Burden Compare
Glass Cost
WAREHOUSE
MANAGEMENT
TEAM
■ To Branch to their own Streamline
Warehouse and to take on
branching partners for the sake of
their application appliances and
other tooling and media
requirements makes the business
of Magi & Marcus a considerable
Ark Enterprise
■ Through building in complex
instances and remotely they have
developed in a whole new science
More complex
portals will be
built
Ark Science
has power of
Morning Star
V3 Glass Package
1

Page: 12
Following the walk concept of ‘delivery of a competent metric service’ we followed the arrangements from its lowest form of dividend (6.5 + .2) to its
branching forms. These branching forms allow new applications to be formed.

Complex
Instancing
■ The glass mass ratio will correspond
to packaging requirements and will
enable the candle-stone packaging
which is nearly weightless in
relationship to its mass to produce
a replication product remotely and
to be then attributed with densifying
product. It is thus equally necessary
to miniaturize scientific assets for
their use in corresponding building
applications remotely.
Source of Glass-Mass
Weight (Pounds per
Kilogram) and inverse
.908
+.001
Maximum
Resource
attributable to an
equity object by
weight equivalency
■ An Example of this calculation follows:
given a load ROI of:
The remainder of
the load according
to the build ratio is
plait able and
Branch able in a
separate container
V3 Glass Package
Digital Cost
Trig for Events
1

Page: 13
The complex instancing requires careful watch on the glass mass ratio which this slide demonstrates. The branching capability of the cloud-star
arrangement keeps the partnering relationships alive and profitable. Installers are a group trained for appliance installation in the home. Note that 909
has trig consequence.

14
Predictably we do not want our timeline to change or to upend due
to various causes that require mitigation tactics; Tactics that we will
develop especially in the crossover from Phase I to Phase II.
Most at-risk
The Actual Glass
System would
allow us to
demonstrate this
better.
Most at-risk
1

Page: 14
Here we point out the crossover between phases is the most at-risk area of the project since all of the localized work needs to be raised to a higher scale of
performance. In order to mitigate the potential for loss in that conditional area we will study the methods of mitigating the outcome using the case
method we have prepared in our next paper. And also, whatever risk we find in other conditions present within the full scope of the project.

Phase I
Graphic
■ Startups and
Digital
achievement
in glass and
green energy
6L/
18L
Phase I
1

Page: 15
For each phase we have developed graphics and their regression compositions to try to find various facts by way of the metric relations.

Phase II
Graphics
■ The Graphics in Phase II are the
most productive throughout the
project supplying the underlying
LIFT components and LENS
variegation facts and work
motivations
10/10/2023
16
SA
SD
78.383 -78.189 =
.14381405 margin
78.189 Push Compare Slide 6
Phase II
slide 5
See b, Build Eq
slide 8
1

Page: 16
Phase II has the most deliberated activities and tasks.

Phase III
Graphics
■ The graphics for Branch and Finish seem
to have less bearing on the project than
the Phase II aspects of T1 & T2 where
most of the engineering occurs for secants
and lens.
■ Streaming Media has a large bearing on
Partnering for the Remote Building. We are
unable to develop the plethora of products
that develop in that composition so that
the project is weighted in the middle,
rather than the market that develops at
the end.
Full Branch Capability changes
the design from Contiguous to
Continuous
BR
FIN
Phase III
1

Page: 17
Phase III lends a great deal of momentum to the push for new products, and we see the contribution of branching and finishing more clearly.

1

Page: 18
Encryption notes borrowed from earlier papers checked for duplicate keys in this paper.

Encrypted Process (Continuous)
Changing the fingerprint for a three-step walk
BRANCHING IN APPLIANCE PROCESSES
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Encrypt Calc1 Calc2 Calc3
It is necessary to branch in appliances
and to switch appliances in a continuous
process; this encrypt mechanic aids a
three-step operation and in the last two
steps allows for a more deliberated output
in accepting three digits.
Extra key
Using 1.11 as
the foot will
convert our
encryptions to
keys for the
next walk
111024
111250
111045
111243 root
New keys
Slide 6
Compare
Original
Keys from
Phase III
Partner Key: Slide9 111,983,524,909
External
Internal
111,314,667 KEY Scientific Assets
From “Converge III”
111.193414 SSE
1

Page: 19
Encryption notes developed for continuous deployment

Partner Investments
y = -15,411,230,860.11020ln(x) +
32,523,480,785.48410
R² = 0.15180
y = 906,677,539,722.99600ln(x) -
235,989,460,005.27100
R² = 0.22145
-
10,000,000,000
20,000,000,000
30,000,000,000
40,000,000,000
50,000,000,000
60,000,000,000
70,000,000,000
(500,000,000,000)
-
500,000,000,000
1,000,000,000,000
1,500,000,000,000
2,000,000,000,000
2,500,000,000,000
3,000,000,000,000
3,500,000,000,000
ARK GLASS COMMUNITY
10/10/2023 Brij Consulting, LLC, Jean Marshall 20
^Oversight Committee LOC (Morningstar)
m
513,292,157,466
From “Converge III”
Payoff is 1000 x
1,223,425,910
Whse IP + Conversion
Gate
Encryption
Charges
1

Page: 20
Partner notes are revealing about business relationships and metric requirements. Note that the warehouse charge is a unitary conversion metric of 378 x
2 = 756. The affiliates do not pay for it.

10/10/2023 21
1. The Scope of Glass Projects: Benchmarking and IF Factor for the scope
determination of Glass and STRABO serialization for Agile
2. Glass Impact: Streaming the Engineering of Components, Solid State
Assemblage, Table Design Outcomes
3. Cascading in Green: The theories and concepts related to the Green
Wall and the starting compositing of green energy and wall migrations.
4. SSE: The Remote End: How Solid-State Engineering is Performance
mined and delivered remotely
5. Cloud-Star Evolution: Where Cloud and Star Evolve to Fluency
6. Simulations in Diminishing Scale: The use of Ring and Lens
7. Simulations: Synergy Modifications: Mitigation in Risk Analysis
SSE
CASCADE
IMPACT
SCOPE
CLOUD-STAR
Brij Consulting, LLC | SlideShare
Part I: City Scale
Part II: Remote Scale
Part III: Confluent Scale
SIMULATIONS
P a p e rs i n D e s ign S e r ies
NEXT
1

Page: 21
Papers in the design series focus on simulations and specifically Part I: City Scale, Part II: Remote Scale and Part III: Confluent Scale. We will begin to
highlight the vector requirements for tasking in our current model and the need for lens facets for scale differentiation. Then in Part II define simulations
reporting. In Part III we begin to move past forms and mix to the confluent modeling of the Ark Science of Glass in the Advancing Age to come.

10/10/2023 22
P a p e rs i n T e s t S e r ies
1. The Car and Road Test: Simulating Glass Cars and Candlestone Roads
Brij Consulting, LLC | SlideShare
V3 Glass Package
V1 Digital Testing
Strabo
Tying projects back to the Strabo Omega
allows for Simulations Cloud to orchestrate
outcomes
Part I,
From Slide 13
2. Home and Foundation Test: Simulating Glass Instances of Candle
stone and Thread in Componentizations utilizing a legacy form of Glass
3. Glass Big Push: Legacy Glass gives way to Solid State Engineering,
Instancing and Building with remote synchronization Parts I, and II/III
Of Pillars and Pipes, Portals and Plaits
Part I:
Results from Tests will be used
in Simulations Analytics… next
1

Page: 22
We look at testing of glass and various forms and methods to begin plan phases (not specific engineering dogma.) We begin with Model O as a sample of
car and road synchronous behavior. Then we will consider testing home and foundation and green energy and candle stone surfaces. We want to look for
the means to tie back into STRABO and Simulations Model for Agile playback. The Third testing paper will close the gap between legacy glass and solid-
state assimilations which develop into remote planning and building tools. In the Second Part of the Third Test Paper, Glass Big Push, we examine the
types of events or changes that impact the Simulation of the Project Performance.

1. Portal Prosperity: An overview of Glass Theory and Ark
Design develops property reconcilement for Conveyance
2. Crossover Conveyance: Beginning with Remote Signature,
threading the advancing fingerprint with a glass path and
integral site management, moving into SIMULATIONS in
Real Time
3. Converge- The Remote Build: Tasks to consider the
process of converging to the Remote Build Site and what
considerations are given to producing a remote service or
build out of a productive requirement, introducing sandbox
theory. Phase I only considers the Kitchen Tech. Phase II
is involved in whole home Media and Tech in Glass.
Phase III develops the land and its attributes. This is three
separate papers.
10/10/2023
Brij Consulting, LLC Jean Marshall 23
1. Studying T&MM: the requirement for certification of mobility
for competent conveyances
2. Portal Projects: the evidence, timing and intelligent use of
portals
3. Calling it Green: Components of Green Energy, short
review: Calling it Green requires new uses of potential and
^studies in wave glass and graphical relationships can raise up
a green energy fluency that will lead to energy self-sufficiency
4. Dimensions in Multivariant Fabrications: Determining Forms
and Contents of Green Energy and Blue Wave Cascade;
relating elements to current science and future requirements
5. Wave and Lens Assimilation: The means to compile and to
build in Glass Systems is described. The use of secant math.
6. Math Solutions for Wave and Lens Assimilations: See also
Commentary for Math Solutions
7. Supply Side Portfolio: Timing and Model of Glass and Green
events to fulfill path… Does the Tan Line help?
8. Partners in T Pluribus Unum: Measuring with Diacritical
Marks
1. Portfolio Wheels: Study of Secants and Wheels in the Dynamic
requirement for Media to write and produce in Ark Science and
Dimensional Systems, Introduction of the Story “Eru finds a Golden
Pen.”
2. Ark Media: The Dialogue of the Story and the Construction of
Storyboards, Mix and Remix specifications, beginning crosswalk and
encryptions
3. Builds and Simulations: Discuss Matrix Trees, Migratory Patterns and
the use of Secants to Build tooling
4. The Corner of Mu Sic: an update of our Digital Paper on Mu Sic to
include Ark encryptions and design considerations
5. The Glass House: Magi and Marcus Engineering plans to invest in a
Plait Glass facility for building and research in remote Ark Science.
Start of Tooling and Secant Design for the Construction Industry
6. The Remote Build: Planning a Theoretical Production for untried
Architecture
7. Glass Mix Z-Form: Production Walk-Thru Glass Mix and Forms, leads
into the Write Process
8. Bridging the Instance: Now operating multiple instances must bridge
the operations, learn about deciduous models and deliberate the
outcome of operations for the 2022 Plan of Magi and Marcus
9. Architectural Builds and Designs: Looking into Delivery Mechanics and
the Products themselves
10. Pipes and Plaits in Ark Mode Design: How the Plait Pipe System
assists with Land Products. See Number Theory
11. Continuous Modeling: Moving away from the Contiguous Model to a
strategy of seamless integration of methods and modes of operation.
See Number Theory.
12. The Glass Warehouse: From Start to Finish the streamlined operations
of the Marcus and Magi Engineering remote architectural process
13. Branch- Sound and Image Construction: Characterizing the branch
capability of new applications, appliances and mode[ls] of operations
1. Ark in Glass: Changing the Schema for Ark Mode crossover, beginning
study of Secants and Wheels for the “cube-ified glass” engineering of
Imaging, sound and motion characteristics.
2. The New Stone: Simulations and Re-instancing to package, confect and
view glass media
3. Dimensional Building: Dimensional Arrays, Z strength, Product Media,
Interdimensional Matrices.
4. The Dynamic Instance: Product Media Discussed
5. The Glass Build: Base Build and Modules Assembled, considering impact of
dimensional systems
6. Glass in the Making: Costing and Loading, Assembly and Assimilation, IP
Defined, Logos
7. Art of the Science: What can be made? Assimilation discussed, look at
basic product ideas
8. Digital Glass Production: Pipe Transit and RIK Declare, Batch Appliance
(Dialogue paper)
9. Imposition of Value Engineering: Establishing and Justifying the Load for
Pipe Transit
10. The Digital Plait Position: Engineering Design of the Load and Thruput
11. ^Mu Sic in the Advancing Age: Use of Fingerprint and Encryption for
Operational Loads
12. Engineering Objects: The Purpose of this Paper is to Consider the means to
raise up a Digital Portal Production System using appliances gained through
Plait Object and Gate driven configurations that work with Digital Mechanics.
Six-Layer Glass and Appliances
13. Instancing at the Gate: Use of Gates and Instances, bridging of the
engineering process
14. Interpolative Scope: Use of a Demand and Production Scope for building
and delivery of product, learning to specify material, looking for union of
Vector
15. Functional Glass: Fitness for Function and Moral Intelligence, Bayesian
Analysis
16. The Glass Wall: This is a very difficult staging of advanced engineering to
depict …Motivated by sound it creates a means by sound to cascade light for
safe and wireless power
17. The Glass Wave: Learning to Plait Gates, Reconcile Metrics to Scorecard,
and load value of Scrum
18. Scrum Costing w/notes (Book It Daniel): establishing scrum standards
(Dialogue paper)
19. Gate Plait Green (Mark It Mark): first scalable plait arrangement overcomes
bottleneck (Dialogue paper)
20. Scorecard Integration (Map It Ralph): A review of mappings to date, marking
old vs. new (Dialogue paper)
Motion Projects-8
Remote Theory-5
Ark Model-13 Digital-20
Go to https://www.slideshare.net/Marshallja/presentations
https://www.slideshare.net/Marshallja/commentary-for-math-solutions-for-
wave-and-lens-assimilationpdf
Roadmap: #47 & #48 & #49
Dimensional Building in Ark Design
Glass Cars and New Product Roadmap
Calendar Cartography
Building with Glass #50
New
Remote Theory
Ark Model
Motion Projects
Building
1

Page: 23
The Learning Series

Simulations
Project
Glass Systems| Brij Consulting, LLC |
Jean A. Marshall
Mitigation in Risk Analysis
Results from Tests will be used
in Simulations Analytics… next
1

Page: 24
Our next paper is highlighted as the agile tasking simulations mitigation scenario that determines the handling method of various scenarios and the
splicing effect of certain developmental requirements.

Comments on Glass Big Push II & III.pdf

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Comments on Glass Big Push II & III.pdf

Similar a Comments on Glass Big Push II & III.pdf (20)

Más de Brij Consulting, LLC

Más de Brij Consulting, LLC (20)

Último

Último (20)

Comments on Glass Big Push II & III.pdf