6. Times Higher Education (THE): 5 criteria
• Teaching Reputation(30%)
• Research Reputation(30%)
• Citation (30%)
• International Outlook (7.5%)
• Industry Income (2.5%)
Quacquarelli Symonds (QS): 5 criteria
• Academic Reputation (40%)
• Employer Reputation (10%)
• Faculty Student (20%)
• Citation per Faculty (20%)
• Intenational Faculty (5%)
• International Students (5%)
The scores of WURs are all relative scores based on absolute scores.
Top university : 100 pts
Average : 50 pts
7. It is possible to say being
log-normal distributed.
THE Research Reputation
8. It is possible to say being
log-normally distributed.
THE Teaching Reputation
9. It is difficult to regard this distribution as ‘natural’.
THE Citations
10. It is difficult to regard this distribution as ‘natural’.
QS Citation per faculty
11. Conclusion
Some indicators of WUR seem to be artificially
manipulated.
Reputation surveys seems to be ‘natural’.
Indicators related to citation cannot be ‘natural’.
However, we believe that citation indicators are
statistical and scientific.
Nevertheless, research IR practitioners analyze
WUR statistically, don’t they?