SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 27
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Case Study:
FINANCING THE 169 / BREN ROAD INTERCHANGE
Merrill Shepherd King
Finance Director, City of Minnetonka, MN
104th GFOA Annual Conference
Atlanta, Georgia
June 9, 2010
The Plot
 Crucial economic development zone
 Development pressures
 Capped transportation capacity
 Expensive infrastructure fix
 NO MONEY
The Lead
The Lead
 $7.8 billion assessed market value
¾ residential, ¼ commercial
 ~$12 million major water/sewer
enterprise
 $11-$12 million annual capital budget
 $27.5 million FY10 gen’l fund budget
The Lead
 No local sales tax
 $21 million total debt - legal limit debt
capacity of $255.5 million (3%)
 ~50% total budget & 75% of gen’l
fund budget from property taxes
 No local income taxes
Opus Business
Park
• 1 sq. mile
• 80% comml
20% resid
• 12,400 jobs
3x by 2030
• 775 hholds
• Light rail
in 2016
Opus Business
Park
• At traffic
capacity
• UHG
• Single hway
entrance
The Other Players
State
Other cities
County School district
Area residents
Interested businesses
Other district businesses
Est. cost of new interchange $19.7 m.
State partnership - grants -$9.7 m.
Remainder to be financed $10.0 m.
Options Considered
• Tax abatement
• Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
• Transportation improvement district
County School district
Other district businesses
Traffic Trip Financing
The Concept - Fairness
 New development “pays its own way.”
 Only property wishing to expand
beyond current use is affected.
 Residential property is not impacted
unless redeveloped to commercial use.
Traffic Trip – single PM peak-hour traffic
count using the 169/Bren Road interchange
(from engineering traffic studies)
Definition:
The Baseline
Max. capacity (traffic trips) of current interchange
minus
Current traffic trips to current interchange
equals
Excess current capacity to be allocated
The Baseline
Allocation of current capacity based upon:
• Zoning – land use and max. density
• Trip generation rates – engineer standard
• Regional adjustment – Transit use,
carpooling, parcel peak times, etc.
• Geographic area in business district
Geographic FactorGeographic Area Factor
 Parcels below allocated capacity may develop
up to allocated traffic trips.
 Parcels above allocated capacity are
grandfathered, but must pay for new
development traffic trips, i.e. the
capacity added by the new interchange.
 No costs for status quo, no development.
Cost yet to be financed $10 million
Add’l capacity added by
new interchange
÷ 789 trips
Traffic Trip Fee
~$12,700 per
trip to new
interchange
Traffic Trip Fee Example
• Parcel at max. allocated trips
• Redevelopment will generate
total 35 new trips
• Located in pink zone (40%)
35 new trips
x 0.4 geographic factor
14 trips to interchange
x $12,700 @ trip fee
$177,800 total trip fees due
Traffic Trip Fee Example
Private Partnership
• Its proposed new development will use
37% of new interchange add’l capacity.
$10 m. local cost x 0.37 = $3.7 m.
• Willing to contribute $5 million of costs.
UHG participation $5.0 m.
$1.3 m.UHG trip fee revenue share
Final Budget
UHG “trip fees” $3.7 m.
UHG partnership $1.3 m.
City investment $5.0 m.
Total project costs $19.7 m.
State grants $9.7 m.
20:80 UHG:city
Selling the Plan
 Businesses, commercial property
owners, chamber of commerce
 Residential properties, condo &
tenant associations
 Commercial real estate group
 City council, ordinance
Measuring Success
Costs:
Engineering consultant $15,000
Staff time – development,
cumulative 6 persons
725 hours
Measuring Success
Benefits:
Property tax base increase $40 million
Permit revenue – initial,
one-time
$700,000
Job creation - initial devpt. 1,700 to city
900 to region
20-year capacity for increased traffic &
economic development
Traffic Trip Financing
KEY INGREDIENTS
 Initial capital – existing assets, public or
conduit debt
 No state or other legal constraints
 Devpt analysis – traffic, market, planning
 Ordinance
 Partnerships – private, other governments
Additional information . . .
mking@eminnetonka.com

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a 169 Bren - GFOA Conf Atlanta 6-9-10

Granite Ridge Tax Increment Financing Plan
Granite Ridge Tax Increment Financing PlanGranite Ridge Tax Increment Financing Plan
Granite Ridge Tax Increment Financing PlanKaren Pollard, CEcD, EDP
 
3.6–3.8-Group-Exercise-on-PPP-Feasibility-Studies.pptx
3.6–3.8-Group-Exercise-on-PPP-Feasibility-Studies.pptx3.6–3.8-Group-Exercise-on-PPP-Feasibility-Studies.pptx
3.6–3.8-Group-Exercise-on-PPP-Feasibility-Studies.pptxStrategyPlug
 
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)Michael Burrill
 
Financing Regional Rail
Financing Regional RailFinancing Regional Rail
Financing Regional RailJane Evans
 
HSH Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing Elevated Rail System
HSH Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing Elevated Rail SystemHSH Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing Elevated Rail System
HSH Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing Elevated Rail SystemJustin Sutton
 
Close the Gap: Mobility Freedom
Close the Gap: Mobility FreedomClose the Gap: Mobility Freedom
Close the Gap: Mobility FreedomHeartland2050
 
Transportation Benefit Districts
Transportation Benefit DistrictsTransportation Benefit Districts
Transportation Benefit DistrictsJustin_Clary
 
HSH Dublin Regional Elevated Rail System 72km 15 April 2021
HSH Dublin Regional Elevated Rail System 72km 15 April 2021HSH Dublin Regional Elevated Rail System 72km 15 April 2021
HSH Dublin Regional Elevated Rail System 72km 15 April 2021Justin Sutton
 
HSH ERS PreLimPro Bangkok 248km 22feb2022
HSH ERS PreLimPro Bangkok 248km 22feb2022HSH ERS PreLimPro Bangkok 248km 22feb2022
HSH ERS PreLimPro Bangkok 248km 22feb2022Justin Sutton
 
Decongesting New York
Decongesting New YorkDecongesting New York
Decongesting New Yorkstreetsblog
 
HSH Ireland 235km Dublin to Shannon 13 April 2021-lr
HSH Ireland 235km Dublin to Shannon 13 April 2021-lrHSH Ireland 235km Dublin to Shannon 13 April 2021-lr
HSH Ireland 235km Dublin to Shannon 13 April 2021-lrJustin Sutton
 
San Mateo County transportation tax poll
San Mateo County transportation tax pollSan Mateo County transportation tax poll
San Mateo County transportation tax pollAdina Levin
 
Final_SierraClubLP_SSF_DSAP_CommentLetter
Final_SierraClubLP_SSF_DSAP_CommentLetterFinal_SierraClubLP_SSF_DSAP_CommentLetter
Final_SierraClubLP_SSF_DSAP_CommentLetterKenneth Rosales
 

Similar a 169 Bren - GFOA Conf Atlanta 6-9-10 (20)

Funding Opportunities for Premium Transit Corridors Presenation
Funding Opportunities for Premium Transit Corridors PresenationFunding Opportunities for Premium Transit Corridors Presenation
Funding Opportunities for Premium Transit Corridors Presenation
 
Granite Ridge Tax Increment Financing Plan
Granite Ridge Tax Increment Financing PlanGranite Ridge Tax Increment Financing Plan
Granite Ridge Tax Increment Financing Plan
 
Granite ridge tif
Granite ridge tifGranite ridge tif
Granite ridge tif
 
3.6–3.8-Group-Exercise-on-PPP-Feasibility-Studies.pptx
3.6–3.8-Group-Exercise-on-PPP-Feasibility-Studies.pptx3.6–3.8-Group-Exercise-on-PPP-Feasibility-Studies.pptx
3.6–3.8-Group-Exercise-on-PPP-Feasibility-Studies.pptx
 
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)
 
Financing Regional Rail
Financing Regional RailFinancing Regional Rail
Financing Regional Rail
 
Funding the future October 2017
Funding the future October 2017Funding the future October 2017
Funding the future October 2017
 
HSH Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing Elevated Rail System
HSH Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing Elevated Rail SystemHSH Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing Elevated Rail System
HSH Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing Elevated Rail System
 
Close the Gap: Mobility Freedom
Close the Gap: Mobility FreedomClose the Gap: Mobility Freedom
Close the Gap: Mobility Freedom
 
Transportation Benefit Districts
Transportation Benefit DistrictsTransportation Benefit Districts
Transportation Benefit Districts
 
Land value tax gap closure proposal
Land value tax gap closure proposalLand value tax gap closure proposal
Land value tax gap closure proposal
 
HSH Dublin Regional Elevated Rail System 72km 15 April 2021
HSH Dublin Regional Elevated Rail System 72km 15 April 2021HSH Dublin Regional Elevated Rail System 72km 15 April 2021
HSH Dublin Regional Elevated Rail System 72km 15 April 2021
 
HSH ERS PreLimPro Bangkok 248km 22feb2022
HSH ERS PreLimPro Bangkok 248km 22feb2022HSH ERS PreLimPro Bangkok 248km 22feb2022
HSH ERS PreLimPro Bangkok 248km 22feb2022
 
Decongesting New York
Decongesting New YorkDecongesting New York
Decongesting New York
 
HSH Ireland 235km Dublin to Shannon 13 April 2021-lr
HSH Ireland 235km Dublin to Shannon 13 April 2021-lrHSH Ireland 235km Dublin to Shannon 13 April 2021-lr
HSH Ireland 235km Dublin to Shannon 13 April 2021-lr
 
San Mateo County transportation tax poll
San Mateo County transportation tax pollSan Mateo County transportation tax poll
San Mateo County transportation tax poll
 
Smart Growth Climate Change and Prosperity
Smart Growth Climate Change and Prosperity Smart Growth Climate Change and Prosperity
Smart Growth Climate Change and Prosperity
 
HTown Day 2012 - The Honorable Ronald C. Green
HTown Day 2012 - The Honorable Ronald C. GreenHTown Day 2012 - The Honorable Ronald C. Green
HTown Day 2012 - The Honorable Ronald C. Green
 
Growth Management Strategy
Growth Management StrategyGrowth Management Strategy
Growth Management Strategy
 
Final_SierraClubLP_SSF_DSAP_CommentLetter
Final_SierraClubLP_SSF_DSAP_CommentLetterFinal_SierraClubLP_SSF_DSAP_CommentLetter
Final_SierraClubLP_SSF_DSAP_CommentLetter
 

169 Bren - GFOA Conf Atlanta 6-9-10

  • 1. Case Study: FINANCING THE 169 / BREN ROAD INTERCHANGE Merrill Shepherd King Finance Director, City of Minnetonka, MN 104th GFOA Annual Conference Atlanta, Georgia June 9, 2010
  • 2. The Plot  Crucial economic development zone  Development pressures  Capped transportation capacity  Expensive infrastructure fix  NO MONEY
  • 4. The Lead  $7.8 billion assessed market value ¾ residential, ¼ commercial  ~$12 million major water/sewer enterprise  $11-$12 million annual capital budget  $27.5 million FY10 gen’l fund budget
  • 5. The Lead  No local sales tax  $21 million total debt - legal limit debt capacity of $255.5 million (3%)  ~50% total budget & 75% of gen’l fund budget from property taxes  No local income taxes
  • 6. Opus Business Park • 1 sq. mile • 80% comml 20% resid • 12,400 jobs 3x by 2030 • 775 hholds • Light rail in 2016
  • 7. Opus Business Park • At traffic capacity • UHG • Single hway entrance
  • 8. The Other Players State Other cities County School district Area residents Interested businesses Other district businesses
  • 9. Est. cost of new interchange $19.7 m. State partnership - grants -$9.7 m. Remainder to be financed $10.0 m.
  • 10. Options Considered • Tax abatement • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) • Transportation improvement district County School district Other district businesses
  • 12. The Concept - Fairness  New development “pays its own way.”  Only property wishing to expand beyond current use is affected.  Residential property is not impacted unless redeveloped to commercial use.
  • 13. Traffic Trip – single PM peak-hour traffic count using the 169/Bren Road interchange (from engineering traffic studies) Definition:
  • 14. The Baseline Max. capacity (traffic trips) of current interchange minus Current traffic trips to current interchange equals Excess current capacity to be allocated
  • 15. The Baseline Allocation of current capacity based upon: • Zoning – land use and max. density • Trip generation rates – engineer standard • Regional adjustment – Transit use, carpooling, parcel peak times, etc. • Geographic area in business district
  • 17.  Parcels below allocated capacity may develop up to allocated traffic trips.  Parcels above allocated capacity are grandfathered, but must pay for new development traffic trips, i.e. the capacity added by the new interchange.  No costs for status quo, no development.
  • 18. Cost yet to be financed $10 million Add’l capacity added by new interchange ÷ 789 trips Traffic Trip Fee ~$12,700 per trip to new interchange
  • 19. Traffic Trip Fee Example • Parcel at max. allocated trips • Redevelopment will generate total 35 new trips • Located in pink zone (40%)
  • 20. 35 new trips x 0.4 geographic factor 14 trips to interchange x $12,700 @ trip fee $177,800 total trip fees due Traffic Trip Fee Example
  • 21. Private Partnership • Its proposed new development will use 37% of new interchange add’l capacity. $10 m. local cost x 0.37 = $3.7 m. • Willing to contribute $5 million of costs. UHG participation $5.0 m. $1.3 m.UHG trip fee revenue share
  • 22. Final Budget UHG “trip fees” $3.7 m. UHG partnership $1.3 m. City investment $5.0 m. Total project costs $19.7 m. State grants $9.7 m. 20:80 UHG:city
  • 23. Selling the Plan  Businesses, commercial property owners, chamber of commerce  Residential properties, condo & tenant associations  Commercial real estate group  City council, ordinance
  • 24. Measuring Success Costs: Engineering consultant $15,000 Staff time – development, cumulative 6 persons 725 hours
  • 25. Measuring Success Benefits: Property tax base increase $40 million Permit revenue – initial, one-time $700,000 Job creation - initial devpt. 1,700 to city 900 to region 20-year capacity for increased traffic & economic development
  • 26. Traffic Trip Financing KEY INGREDIENTS  Initial capital – existing assets, public or conduit debt  No state or other legal constraints  Devpt analysis – traffic, market, planning  Ordinance  Partnerships – private, other governments
  • 27. Additional information . . . mking@eminnetonka.com