SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 19
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Making TV Pay: The Telco Challenge

The H
Th Heavy Reading Pay TV Survey
         R di P         S
November 2008



 Adi Kishore
 Senior Analyst
 Heavy Reading
      y        g
 www.heavyreading.com
Survey Overview




   • Online Survey

   • Conducted in October-November 2008

   • 193 respondents, queried on their pay TV services,
     their attitudes towards those services and the type of
     companies that provide them

   • Bases ranged from 99 to 193 for each question
Survey Focus



 • How should Telcos be marketing and positioning their
   Pay TV services for maximum take up?
                               take-up?
     • How satisfied are existing subscribers?
     • What are the key drivers of satisfaction
     • What could cause existing customers to churn?
     • What would attract new subscribers from competitors?
     • What features/applications/offers are most likely to resound
       with consumers
     • How price sensitive are consumers in this economic
       environment?
Telcos are in the unfortunate position of needing to pull away
 subscribers from cable and satellite operators

                                 Current Pay TV Provider


          Cable                                                      56.8%



         Satellite                               29.7%



            Telco                10.8%



           Other          2.7%


                     0%     10%       20%      30%       40%   50%   60%
n=185
Churn could be slowing, perhaps due to multiplay bundles


                                 Tenure with current provider


           Less than 1 yr                   15.2%



                  1-3 yrs                                  30.4%



                  3-5 yrs                  14.1%



        More than 5 Years                                            40.2%


                            0%     10%        20%       30%        40%       50%
n=184
60+ percent of respondents get multiple services from their TV
provider, but the remaining 40% are a significant opportunity


                     Additional Services From TV Provider

        100.00%


        80.00%


        60.00%                  57.8%

                                                               38.8%
        40.00%    33.50%

        20.00%
                                               7.6%
         0.00%
                  Phone         Internet      Wireless      None of above


n=185
Unfortunately, the primary driver for a bundle is price


                  Reasons For Selecting One Provider For Multiple Services


        100.00%


        80.00%
                        62.83%
        60.00%


        40.00%
                                            23.9%
        20.00%                                                   13.3%
                                                                 13 3%

         0.00%
                         Cost              Single Bill
                                              g               Best Provider


n=113
Price is also the only area where customer satisfaction is
relatively low

                             Current Providers Rating on Listed Criteria

                                                        Excellent          Good

75.0%

60.0%

45.0%

30.0%

15.0%
15 0%               11%


  0.0%
                   Price          Programming          Dependability Customer Care    Advanced      HDTV
                                                                                     Applications

Note: Advanced applications included VOD, DVR, Online gaming, premium packages
n=183, 184
Customers are not really looking to switch providers – a bad sign
for those that need to gain new subscribers

                              Likely To Switch Providers


   100.0%


        80.0%


        60.0%
                                       45.4%                46.5%
        40.0%


        20.0%
                  8.1%

        0.0%
                Very Likely
                   y      y       Somewhat Likely
                                                y          Not Likely
                                                                    y


n=185
Prior churn was driven by a number of factors


                           Reasons For Leaving Last Provider


                  Cost                                                  29.9%


        Service quality                                                  30.7%
                                                                         30 7%


  Programming Choices                                          23.6%


                Moved                                                   29.1%


                 Other                              17.32%


                          0%    5%    10%    15%     20%       25%     30%   35%
n=127
And there are various requirements stated for a new provider. But
except for price, satisfaction levels are quite high for these criteria

                        Importance Of Listed Criteria In Selecting A Provider

                                                Very Important              Important
100.0%



 75.0%
     %



 50.0%



 25.0%



   0.0%
                    Price          Programming          Dependability Customer Care      Advanced      HDTV
                                                                                        Applications
Note: Advanced applications included VOD, DVR, Online gaming, premium packages
n=183-185
But when it comes down to actually picking the pay TV provider,
 discounts drove the majority

                   Reason For Picking Current Provider



                 Discount                                            52.0%



   Friend Recommendation               12.6%



        Saw Advertisement               15.0%



                    Other                      20.47%


                            0%   10%     20%      30%    40%   50%     60%
n=127
And it’s again single-mindedly price that would make them
 switch today

                     Reason For Switching From Current Provider


                    Price                                            59.6%


   Programming Choices                  11.1%
                                        11 1%


            Dependability                 15.2%


          Customer Care          4.0%


       Advanced Features         4.04%


                            0%    10%      20%    30%   40%   50%   60%   70%
n=99
Providers aren’t being able to significantly differentiate themselves,
 so price might be the only differentiator

                        Kind of Provider I Would Choose If I Switched


 Don't Know/Not Sure                                                    42.4%


              Other          1 0%
                             1.0%


            Satellite                             21.2%


               Telco                      13.1%


              Cable                                22.22%


                        0%          10%      20%          30%     40%       50%

n=183
Summary and Conclusions


•   Price, discounts more critical than ever for subscriber acquisition
     • Very pronounced emphasis on price, quite probably a result of current
       economic situation
               i it ti
•   Churn appears to be slowing with long tenures and fairly high
    satisfaction
     • Bundling likely primary cause of this trend
     • Makes it harder for Telcos to gain subscribers
•   Emerging applications valued but not being seen as subscription
    drivers
     • After price, dependability/service quality is most important
•   Not much commitment to any particular provider type
     • Undecideds are the largest segment with majority open to a deal of some
       kind
Questions…
        Questions




Adi Kishore
Senior Analyst
Heavy Reading
www.heavyreading.com
The Heavy Reading Pay TV Survey
November 2008
N    b




Thank You.

  Adi Kishore
  Senior Analyst
  Heavy Reading
       y        g
  www.heavyreading.com
Interest in advanced features


                   Very Interested   Somewhat Interested

100.0%



 75.0%



 50.0%



 25.0%



  0.0%
            VOD     DVR         Gaming     Premium         ITV   HDTV
                                           packages

n=178-181
Previous Provider




  Never used anyone else                           30.1%
                                                   30 1%



                Satellite                14.2%
                                         14 2%



                   Telco         2.2%
                                 2 2%



                  Cable                                            53.55%


                            0%     10%    20%    30%   40%   50%     60%


n=183

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Making TV Pay: The Telco Challenge

Best Practice Approaches for Proactive Quality Management
Best Practice Approaches for Proactive Quality ManagementBest Practice Approaches for Proactive Quality Management
Best Practice Approaches for Proactive Quality Management
The Avoca Group
 
2012 benchmark data joe zeff
2012 benchmark data   joe zeff2012 benchmark data   joe zeff
2012 benchmark data joe zeff
bullhornlive
 
Innovative tv audience measurement tools
Innovative tv audience measurement toolsInnovative tv audience measurement tools
Innovative tv audience measurement tools
Steve Weaver
 
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
PMI_IREP_TP
 
Day 2 1135 - 1220 - pearl 1 - avinash kumar
Day 2   1135 - 1220 - pearl 1 - avinash kumarDay 2   1135 - 1220 - pearl 1 - avinash kumar
Day 2 1135 - 1220 - pearl 1 - avinash kumar
PMI2011
 
Managed services
Managed servicesManaged services
Managed services
rakeysh001
 

Similar a Making TV Pay: The Telco Challenge (20)

Smart TV
Smart TVSmart TV
Smart TV
 
tv.next
tv.nexttv.next
tv.next
 
Marginal Cost Pricing and Subsidy of Transit in Small Urbanized Areas
Marginal Cost Pricing and Subsidy of Transit in Small Urbanized AreasMarginal Cost Pricing and Subsidy of Transit in Small Urbanized Areas
Marginal Cost Pricing and Subsidy of Transit in Small Urbanized Areas
 
Best Practice Approaches for Proactive Quality Management
Best Practice Approaches for Proactive Quality ManagementBest Practice Approaches for Proactive Quality Management
Best Practice Approaches for Proactive Quality Management
 
Bullhorn Live Benchmarking Session
Bullhorn Live Benchmarking SessionBullhorn Live Benchmarking Session
Bullhorn Live Benchmarking Session
 
Case Study : Pricing Plan on Tight Competition
Case Study : Pricing Plan on Tight CompetitionCase Study : Pricing Plan on Tight Competition
Case Study : Pricing Plan on Tight Competition
 
2012 benchmark data joe zeff
2012 benchmark data   joe zeff2012 benchmark data   joe zeff
2012 benchmark data joe zeff
 
How Banks will Generate Revenue on Payments and Checking in the New Era
How Banks will Generate Revenue on Payments and Checking in the New EraHow Banks will Generate Revenue on Payments and Checking in the New Era
How Banks will Generate Revenue on Payments and Checking in the New Era
 
Innovative tv audience measurement tools
Innovative tv audience measurement toolsInnovative tv audience measurement tools
Innovative tv audience measurement tools
 
Wateen Wimax Marketing Research
Wateen Wimax  Marketing ResearchWateen Wimax  Marketing Research
Wateen Wimax Marketing Research
 
Tackling Technology: Viewability, Tracking & Attribution - DPRS Nashville, 11...
Tackling Technology: Viewability, Tracking & Attribution - DPRS Nashville, 11...Tackling Technology: Viewability, Tracking & Attribution - DPRS Nashville, 11...
Tackling Technology: Viewability, Tracking & Attribution - DPRS Nashville, 11...
 
Turkcell Financial Position
Turkcell Financial PositionTurkcell Financial Position
Turkcell Financial Position
 
Intellitrends Results for Dealer Website Visitor Survey
Intellitrends Results for Dealer Website Visitor SurveyIntellitrends Results for Dealer Website Visitor Survey
Intellitrends Results for Dealer Website Visitor Survey
 
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
Day 202-20-201135-20-201220-20-20pearl-201-20-20avinash-20kumar-131008015752-...
 
Day 2 1135 - 1220 - pearl 1 - avinash kumar
Day 2   1135 - 1220 - pearl 1 - avinash kumarDay 2   1135 - 1220 - pearl 1 - avinash kumar
Day 2 1135 - 1220 - pearl 1 - avinash kumar
 
Managed services
Managed servicesManaged services
Managed services
 
Managed services
Managed servicesManaged services
Managed services
 
Past and present | 25 years of Service Desk KPIs
Past and present | 25 years of Service Desk KPIsPast and present | 25 years of Service Desk KPIs
Past and present | 25 years of Service Desk KPIs
 
Vodafone marketing ppt
Vodafone marketing pptVodafone marketing ppt
Vodafone marketing ppt
 
USEAGE OF CELLULAR SERVICES Most Preferred Cellular Service
USEAGE OF CELLULAR SERVICES Most Preferred Cellular ServiceUSEAGE OF CELLULAR SERVICES Most Preferred Cellular Service
USEAGE OF CELLULAR SERVICES Most Preferred Cellular Service
 

Último

CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of ServiceCNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
giselly40
 

Último (20)

Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdfTech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
Understanding Discord NSFW Servers A Guide for Responsible Users.pdf
Understanding Discord NSFW Servers A Guide for Responsible Users.pdfUnderstanding Discord NSFW Servers A Guide for Responsible Users.pdf
Understanding Discord NSFW Servers A Guide for Responsible Users.pdf
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of ServiceCNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
CNv6 Instructor Chapter 6 Quality of Service
 
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
 

Making TV Pay: The Telco Challenge

  • 1. Making TV Pay: The Telco Challenge The H Th Heavy Reading Pay TV Survey R di P S November 2008 Adi Kishore Senior Analyst Heavy Reading y g www.heavyreading.com
  • 2. Survey Overview • Online Survey • Conducted in October-November 2008 • 193 respondents, queried on their pay TV services, their attitudes towards those services and the type of companies that provide them • Bases ranged from 99 to 193 for each question
  • 3. Survey Focus • How should Telcos be marketing and positioning their Pay TV services for maximum take up? take-up? • How satisfied are existing subscribers? • What are the key drivers of satisfaction • What could cause existing customers to churn? • What would attract new subscribers from competitors? • What features/applications/offers are most likely to resound with consumers • How price sensitive are consumers in this economic environment?
  • 4. Telcos are in the unfortunate position of needing to pull away subscribers from cable and satellite operators Current Pay TV Provider Cable 56.8% Satellite 29.7% Telco 10.8% Other 2.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% n=185
  • 5. Churn could be slowing, perhaps due to multiplay bundles Tenure with current provider Less than 1 yr 15.2% 1-3 yrs 30.4% 3-5 yrs 14.1% More than 5 Years 40.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% n=184
  • 6. 60+ percent of respondents get multiple services from their TV provider, but the remaining 40% are a significant opportunity Additional Services From TV Provider 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 57.8% 38.8% 40.00% 33.50% 20.00% 7.6% 0.00% Phone Internet Wireless None of above n=185
  • 7. Unfortunately, the primary driver for a bundle is price Reasons For Selecting One Provider For Multiple Services 100.00% 80.00% 62.83% 60.00% 40.00% 23.9% 20.00% 13.3% 13 3% 0.00% Cost Single Bill g Best Provider n=113
  • 8. Price is also the only area where customer satisfaction is relatively low Current Providers Rating on Listed Criteria Excellent Good 75.0% 60.0% 45.0% 30.0% 15.0% 15 0% 11% 0.0% Price Programming Dependability Customer Care Advanced HDTV Applications Note: Advanced applications included VOD, DVR, Online gaming, premium packages n=183, 184
  • 9. Customers are not really looking to switch providers – a bad sign for those that need to gain new subscribers Likely To Switch Providers 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 45.4% 46.5% 40.0% 20.0% 8.1% 0.0% Very Likely y y Somewhat Likely y Not Likely y n=185
  • 10. Prior churn was driven by a number of factors Reasons For Leaving Last Provider Cost 29.9% Service quality 30.7% 30 7% Programming Choices 23.6% Moved 29.1% Other 17.32% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% n=127
  • 11. And there are various requirements stated for a new provider. But except for price, satisfaction levels are quite high for these criteria Importance Of Listed Criteria In Selecting A Provider Very Important Important 100.0% 75.0% % 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% Price Programming Dependability Customer Care Advanced HDTV Applications Note: Advanced applications included VOD, DVR, Online gaming, premium packages n=183-185
  • 12. But when it comes down to actually picking the pay TV provider, discounts drove the majority Reason For Picking Current Provider Discount 52.0% Friend Recommendation 12.6% Saw Advertisement 15.0% Other 20.47% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% n=127
  • 13. And it’s again single-mindedly price that would make them switch today Reason For Switching From Current Provider Price 59.6% Programming Choices 11.1% 11 1% Dependability 15.2% Customer Care 4.0% Advanced Features 4.04% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% n=99
  • 14. Providers aren’t being able to significantly differentiate themselves, so price might be the only differentiator Kind of Provider I Would Choose If I Switched Don't Know/Not Sure 42.4% Other 1 0% 1.0% Satellite 21.2% Telco 13.1% Cable 22.22% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% n=183
  • 15. Summary and Conclusions • Price, discounts more critical than ever for subscriber acquisition • Very pronounced emphasis on price, quite probably a result of current economic situation i it ti • Churn appears to be slowing with long tenures and fairly high satisfaction • Bundling likely primary cause of this trend • Makes it harder for Telcos to gain subscribers • Emerging applications valued but not being seen as subscription drivers • After price, dependability/service quality is most important • Not much commitment to any particular provider type • Undecideds are the largest segment with majority open to a deal of some kind
  • 16. Questions… Questions Adi Kishore Senior Analyst Heavy Reading www.heavyreading.com
  • 17. The Heavy Reading Pay TV Survey November 2008 N b Thank You. Adi Kishore Senior Analyst Heavy Reading y g www.heavyreading.com
  • 18. Interest in advanced features Very Interested Somewhat Interested 100.0% 75.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% VOD DVR Gaming Premium ITV HDTV packages n=178-181
  • 19. Previous Provider Never used anyone else 30.1% 30 1% Satellite 14.2% 14 2% Telco 2.2% 2 2% Cable 53.55% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% n=183