Lightning talk at the Agile Meetup. Discusses the idea that if you are introducing change you need to understand how the organisation got the way it is now, and address the underlying concerns and drivers, so as to make the chanegs stick.
24. I’ve been there…
Be careful that you don’t give on too many of the constraints
This is insidious, because the constraints may sound reasonable
to their owners
Focus on addressing the intent of the constraint
32. What about Scrum?
• Scrum for common naming
• XP for technical techniques
• Lean for reducing waste
33. Align KRAs to match the goals
• Reduce Sev 1s in production
• Improve Customer satisfaction score
34. What about Offshore Agile
• Increase comms (video etc)
• Visit often – put a face to the voice
• Rotate people onshore-offshore
• Shared information radiators (Mingle)
• Adjust your expectations
37. Insist on Heavy Documentation
Don’t Empower the teams
Demand tight predictability
Don’t make your resources available
Lip service, but no real support
Promote the blame culture
Punish Failure
TW get a tagged with the “Zealot” tag because the are willing to challenge the existing constraints.
TW get a tagged with the “Zealot” tag because the are willing to challenge the existing constraints.
Use the forums, but focus on intent and work on reducing delays.
A lot of change starts “Bottom up” as skunk works. For it to survive and grow past a certain size you MUST have a strong sponsor. You are talking about Organisational change. Beware the “hygiene” argument
A lot of change starts “Bottom up” as skunk works. For it to survive and grow past a certain size you MUST have a strong sponsor. You are talking about Organisational change. Beware the “hygiene” argument
Don’t be afraid of the answer.
A lot of change starts “Bottom up” as skunk works. For it to survive and grow past a certain size you MUST have a strong sponsor. You are talking about Organisational change. Beware the “hygiene” argument
A lot of change starts “Bottom up” as skunk works. For it to survive and grow past a certain size you MUST have a strong sponsor. You are talking about Organisational change. Beware the “hygiene” argument
A lot of change starts “Bottom up” as skunk works. For it to survive and grow past a certain size you MUST have a strong sponsor. You are talking about Organisational change. Beware the “hygiene” argument
A lot of change starts “Bottom up” as skunk works. For it to survive and grow past a certain size you MUST have a strong sponsor. You are talking about Organisational change. Beware the “hygiene” argument
Architecture, IT Ops, PMO, CPO etcIT Ops – Process and Documentation driven. How does ITIL fit with Agile,. I manage my SLAs by restricting changes to productionArchitecture- BUFD vs Emergent Design, Fear of loss of control, loss of value,