annual system need some improvement

1. The Mechanism of Annual Education System is an obstacle
in the learning process of commerce students at
Government College of Management Sciences Peshawar.
Noorulhadi
PhD Scholar at Islamia College University Peshawar.
Lecturer at Govt College of Management sciences Peshawar.
(nooruhadi99@yahoo.co) 00923219091220

2. Introduction
Annual examination system is annually term of study
without any break and this system was inherited from
British education system, London education system
established school and university as it aggression on
Hindo-Pak in 1857.
After 1947 no change was made in education policy.
Education commission of Pakistan, 1959
1972-80 education policy was constituted.
1992 NTS was introduced, with distribution of internal
and external marks
1998 NTS, GRE, TOEFL used as instrument for
scholarships
2002, Semester system was initiated by many university.

3. Introduction (cont)
2000-2010, Annual system was replaced in private sectors
2004 Quaid-e-Azam college of management science
university of Peshawar replaced annual system.
But still in 2013, Govt college of management sciences,
Peshawar. Evaluates student using traditional way of
annual system.
Traditional system started in 1857 still acceptable in
Commerce and Management sciences colleges of
Khyberpukhtunkhuwa.
That become obstacle in learning process of B.com and
M.com Students.

4. Introduction(con’t)
 Objective :
Magnifying the iceberg problems faced by commerce
students as in Govt college of management sciences
Peshawar.

5. Literature Review
 Shirazi and Muhammad Jawad Haider ,(2004) described
maximum examination systems, major focused on annual
system with its historical backrong starting from 1857 to
2004.
 Allah Nawaz at al (2009)mentioned main drawback of
Annual system, absenteeism, Leakage of
papers, Impersonation of students, high absenteeism
External assistance during examination ,Smuggling of
unauthorized material specially in annual exam, Copying
from a nearby candidate setting in close
rows, Intimidation, and Irregularities of supervisory staff
by allocating more time to some students.

6. Literature review (con’t)
 Asfandiar and Hashim (2012) compared annual with
semester system, absenteeism, presentation and
assignments value learning process.
 Aggarwal suggested effective method for learning
process which is not possible in current system.

7. Research Methodology
 Data Collection Methods
 Researchers used two main sources that is primary and
secondary source of data.
 Primary Data
 The main obstacle that were traced from literature review and
become obstacles such as absenteeism, confidence building tools
etc in learning process of students in annual system can be
highlighted with reliability, primary data tools was best option.
primary data has been collected through Questionnaire
 Population = Govt college of management sciences, Peshawar
 Sample size = 60 students , 10 Non responses, 50 students
responses were analyzed

8. Research methodology.
 Research Instruments
 Questionnaire with close end questions.
Interview:
DDO Khalid khan Chairman of Computer Department
GCMS Peshawar.
Lecturers and students of GCMS Peshawar.

9. Result and Discussion
Descriptive analysis.
After collection of questionnaire, Ms excel of MS-office
assisted the researcher with easy
tabulation, calculation the result and used of Bar and
Pie chart gave a conceptual understanding over the
result.

30. Conclusion
 This research clearly demonstrates that there is
significant impact of annual system on student
learning process, Absenteeism in annual system
disturbs lectures sequences and also causes less
conceptual understanding, Secondly, less interest of
students arise because of less academic and co-
curriculum activities, that leads students cowardly and
also cause communication gap between students and
teachers, Assignment and presentation skill are
completely ignore in annual system that cause less
conceptual understanding and students feel the course
work as burden, and students pay full attention at the
end of annual days.

31. Recommendation
 Attendance should be valued and should be
aggregated in final result.
 In colleges external examination must be replaced
with internal and continuous evaluation.
 Assignment and presentation must be integral part of
evaluation in annual system as well.
 Education Policy need to trained and authorized
Teachers for some internal marks in annual system.
 Conceptual methodology of learning must systemized.

32. Thanks for your attention
NOORULHADI,
PhD scholar Islamia College university Peshawa.
noorulhadi99@yahoo.com