MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
The Adult Educator's Competences and Competence Development
1. The Adult Educator’s Competences
and Competence Development
Report written by Sprogøe, Vetterlain, Marquard & Vangdrup
Presentation, NVL/Nordplus-conference, Lund
27/9 2017
Jonas Sprogøe, ph.d.
2. In this presentation, I will:
- Provide some background for the survey and
the report
- Present some of the key findings and related
questions
- Initiate and facilitate a process that gives more
input for the future work of NVL/Nordplus
3. Outset
The Nordic countries all
have a well-established
and broad-based adult
education system aimed
at developing, adapting
and strengthening adult
competences to a rapidly
changing society and
labour market.
The Nordic Council of
Ministers, NMR, has a
vision of the Nordic region
as a strong knowledgeable
region, with well-
functioning education,
research and innovation
environments across
borders.
4. Why this survey?
Nordic reports show that at system level there is a lack of attention to and support
of adult educators, with regards to competence development, qualifications and
professionalism
NMR has a wish to extend the knowledge of the need for adult educators’
competence development
The purpose of the survey?
The report supplements the findings and conclusions of previous reports by
mapping the competence needs that the adult educator has experienced him or
herself.
Clarify the adult educator’s approach to joint Nordic education initiatives within
adult learning
A tendency analysis to provide perspectives and questions on the adult educator’s
competences and competence needs
Provide basis for recommendations for further work on
the competence development of Nordic adult
educators
5. Who is this survey about?
Adult learning and competence development take place in various settings;
e.g. educational institutions, professional organisations, private and public
workplaces as well as civil society
The term ‘Adult Educator’ covers several roles: e.g. teacher, facilitator,
consultant, advisor and volunteer coordinator.
How have we done the survey?
A questionnaire has been sent to a wide range of adult educators within
private, public and civil society frameworks through already known Nordic
networks in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Finland, as well as the
autonomous territories with an invitation to forward the questionnaire to
other relevant persons
A broad definition and a large number of respondents and
broadly distributed
9. Being able to treat adult participants as adults
To have knowledge about adults’ learning and learning
processes
To have updated subject specific knowledge
To have updated practice experiences
Being able to communicate
Being able to structure and plan
Being able to use information and communication technology
Being able to relate constructively to the resistance of adults
Being able to use activating working methods
Being able to give guidance to adults
Being able to work in intercultural contexts
10. Key findings and questions
Adult educators generally consider
all selected 11 competencies
important
Especially subject specific
competences, adult educational and
didactic skills are considered highly
important
But also relational skills is given high
importance
ICT and intercultural competence is
rated the least important
12. Key findings and questions
The majority believes that it will ‘to a
large extent’ or ‘to some extent’
strengthen their work if they improve at
the specified competences
Pedagogical and didactical skills are
considered very important to strengthen
Subject-specific knowledge and practical
experiences would strengthen their work
Supplementary areas of competence are
mentioned as relevant areas for
competence development
14. Key findings and questions
The 11 areas of competence are prone
to enhance one’s work, although some
differences appear
45% of employees in public sector rate
that it to a high degree would strengthen
their work to improve “treating the adult
as adult”, wheras only 25% of self-
employed (consultants etc.) think the
same.
Privately employed rate the need for
improving communication competence
higher than other sector groups
Self-employed rate the need for improving
ICT-competences lower than employees in
public sector.
The differences between the
employment groups, could call for a
differentiation in focus and scope of
competence development
16. Key findings and questions
Respondents are predominantly
positive toward joint Nordic
competence development activities
Subject-specific relevance and adult
educational relevance are stated to
be of particular importance
The uniformity of the Nordic
countries as well as the diversity of
the countries is used as a reason for
the value of joint transnational
competence development
17. Process in two steps
Individually
Fill out the competence sheet – just 2-3 minutes
What do you consider the most important competences in
relation to adult education?
What are your most important competence development
needs?
In groups
Discuss the question at the table
Please note answers, reflections and comments on flip-
charts
18. • The cards in the same colour have the same questions
– Red card is about culture and intercultural competences
– Green card is about the respondents rating of a need for
adult pedagogy and didactics
– Yellow card is about creating subject-specific courses
across borders
– Blue card is about the Nordic dimension and how this can
be used for future development of courses and education
• The answers are used as input in the process of the
possible development of a joint nordic competence
development aimed at adult educators
20. Competence sheet
What do you consider the most important competences in
relation to adult education?
Please, prioritize the competences according to importance
Being able to treat adult participants as adults
To have knowledge about adults’ learning and learning
processes
To have updated subject specific knowledge
To have updated practice experiences
Being able to communicate
Being able to structure and plan
Being able to use information and communication
technology
Being able to relate constructively to the resistance of adults
Being able to use activating working methods
Being able to give guidance to adults
Being able to work in intercultural contexts
What are your most important competence development needs?
Please, prioritize which competences could strenghten your work
as an adult educator, if developed
Being able to treat adult participants as adults
To have knowledge about adults’ learning and learning
processes
To have updated subject specific knowledge
To have updated practice experiences
Being able to communicate
Being able to structure and plan
Being able to use information and communication technology
Being able to relate constructively to the resistance of adults
Being able to use activating working methods
Being able to give guidance to adults
Being able to work in intercultural contexts
21. Question
Please, share some insights from the Competence Sheet,
then discuss:
Which significance should culture be given in the
teaching situation, and does it require specific
competences to teach in intercultural settings?
How can Nordplus/NVL work with this area on a joint
Nordic level?
Please provide 2-3 concrete suggestions
22. Question
Please, share some insights from the Competence Sheet,
then discuss:
How may we interpret the respondents’ relatively high
weighting of the importance of strengthening their
competences within the areas of adult education and
didactics?
How can Nordplus/NVL work with this area on a joint
Nordic level?
Please provide 2-3 concrete suggestions
23. Question
Please, share some insights from the Competence Sheet, then
discuss:
Which challenges and potentials can there be when organizing
subject-specific courses or competence development aimed at
professional groups across borders?
How can Nordplus/NVL work with this area on a joint Nordic
level?
Please provide 2-3 concrete suggestions
24. Question
Please, share some insights from the Competence Sheet, then
discuss:
How may we interpret the particular ‘Nordic-ness’, and how
can that be used as an outset for organizing, doing and
branding transnational competence development
activities?
How can Nordplus/NVL work with this area on a joint
Nordic level?
Please provide 2-3 concrete suggestions
Notas del editor
I have the pleasure of presenting the report The Adult Educators Competences and Competence Development on behalf of the authors.
This presentation consists of three parts.
First I will provide a little background for the survey and the report to give some context
Then I will present some of the key findings, and present some of the related questions that arose from our analysis.
And finally, I will facilitate a process that gives us more input for the future work of deciding if and how to develop competence development for adult educators in the Nordic countries.
The outset or the background for the report and our analysis are twofold:
1: we already have a well-established adult education system, and as such are already used to adapt to chanigng conditions, changing societies and labour markets. So the report is not a contribution to establishing or making up any such systems, but can build on and nuance the already existing debate on adult education in the Nordic countries.
2: and the report can be seen as one of many contributions to fulfilling the vision of the Nordic Council of Ministers of the Nordic region as a strong knowledgable region with strong education, research and innovation environments across borders.
With these two perspectives in mind, I will explain more in detail why’s and how’s of the report.
1
When reading through various other reports, is appears, that at a systems level, there is a lack of attention to and support of adult ecucatiors, with regards to competence devlopment.
And with the afore mentioned societal and demographic changes, there are new demands for competences for the adult educator, as well as on an instittutional level.
And of course it is in the interest of Nordic Council of Ministers to know more about these demands to meet future needs for competent adult educators.
2
So the purpose of the study was to build on and supplement previous reports by focusing on the competence needs from a practitioners perspective. We wanted to know more about the adult educators’ own experiences with and needs for competence development.
Also, we wanted to know more about the experiences with and needs for joint Nordic education and competence development.
And we wanted to provide new perspectives and ask new questions to the adult educator’s competences and competence needs.
The purpose of all this is to provide basis for recommendations for further work on the competence development of Nordic adult educators.
1
We have used a broad definition of the adult education; one that covers teacher, facilitator, consultant etc. We have done so to acknowledge that adult education takes place in a variety of settings – from formal education in educational institutions to more informal contexts in private and public workplaces,
2
We have sent the questionnaire to a wide range of adult educators with in the different settings with an invitation to pass it on. Some of you have probably received it and passed it on to colleagues and networks. In total more than 800 people started the questionnaire and more than 500 have completed the entire set of questions. WE have tested for these inconsistencies in the analysis.
So to reiterate, the special feature of this study is that we ask about the practitioners’ own experiences and needs.
The survey is a tendency analysis that provides a number of perspectives on the adult educator’s competences and competence needs, as well as posing new questions that may be subject to further investigation or be subject to more research and further
The study focuses on four themes:
The respondents’ experience of the importance of different competences for working with adult learning
heir own competence needs
This is what we call a competence dimension, and it highlights the competences considered important and to what extent the respondents consider a need to be developed
Then we have a target group dimension where we explore:
3) Competence needs in relation to sector affiliation, e.g are there differences to the questions whether you are puiblic or privately engaged, whether your are in formal or informal adult education.
4) And we inverstigate conditions for participation, including the respondents’ experiences with Nordic cooperation on competence development and if there are any conditioning factors that needs to be considered.
All this should is meant to provide a closer understanding of how to plan and organise competence development in relation to form, content and target group.
But let me introduce the different dimensions.
We have asked the respondents to score a number of competences in relation to how important they are for their work as adult educators. I will not go into too much detail with the numbers, as it can be a very boring presentation.
But based on the reading of another report on Nordic adult education, namely The Nordic Adult Educator (Marquard and Sørensen) from 2011, we derived these 11 competences.
The key findings.
We have not asked the respondents to compare the competences, but they generally consider all selected 11 competencies important
But also relational skills is given high importance (meeting the adult as adults and guidance)
It raises a number of questions that can be used in subequent research on joint Nordic adult educators competence development.
We have also asked the repsondents to what extent they believe that improving the 11 selected competencies would strengthen their work as adult educators. In other words, we have tried to find out what competences could lead to better adult educators.
Supplementary areas of competence, such as knowledge of target group problems, didactical tools, educational management and transfer and jobmarket, are mentioned as relevant areas for competence development – in the report you can see some examples of the suggestions, that people give.
In terms of target group we have analysed how different target groups have responded to the different questions in order to look for variations, that might be considered when planning for competence development.
The key findings relate to how different groups have responded to the need for improving certain competences.
1
In general: The 11 areas of competence are prone to enhance one’s work, although some differences appear:
45% of employees in public sector rate that it to a high degree would strengthen their work to improve “treating the adult as adult”, wheras only 25% of self-employed (consultants etc.) think the same.
Privately employed rate the need for improving communication competence higher than other sector groups
Self-employed rate the need for improving ICT-competences lower than employees in public sector.
2
The differences between the employment groups, could call for a differentiation in focus and scope of competence development
The last focus area of survey is about the wish for and conditions for participating in joint Nordic competence development
1
Nice to know that respondents are positive towards joint Nordic Competence development. It gives a sound base to work from, I think.
2
Of particular important is stated subject-specific relevance and adult educational relevance. `Whether it is important for the employer is rated lower, as is location, price and duration.
3
We also asked the repondents to elaborate on the value of joint Nordic competence development, and two stated reasons stands out: the uniformity of the Nordic countries are used as argument, as well as the diversity.
Hvilken betydning bør kultur tillægges i undervisningssituationen, og kræver det særlige kompetencer at undervise i interkulturelle sammenhænge?
Hvordan kan man forstå respondenternes relativt høje vægtning af vigtigheden af at blive bedre til voksenpædagogik og –didaktik?
Hvilke udfordringer kan der være ved at tilrettelægge specifikke fagkurser eller kompetenceudviklingsforløb rettet mod faggrupper på tværs af landegrænser?
Hvori består det særligt nordiske, og hvordan kan dette bruges som afsæt for tilrettelæggelse, afvikling og markedsføring af fælles tværnationale kompetenceudviklingsaktiviteter?