This presentation was made by David Turner, Economics Department, OECD, at the 11th Meeting of OECD PBO & IFIs held in Lisbon, Portugal, on 4-5 February 2019
contact "+971)558539980" to buy abortion pills in Dubai, Abu Dhabi
Longer-term forecastings - David Turner, Economics Department, OECD
1. THE LONG VIEW: SCENARIOS FOR
THE WORLD ECONOMY TO 2060
OECD Economic Policy Paper #22
by Yvan Guillemette and David Turner
11th Annual Meeting of the OECD Network of
Parliamentary Budget Officials and Independent Fiscal
Institutions (PBO)
4 – February
Lisbon Portugal
2. SHORT
1-2 Quarters
MEDIUM
2-3 Years
LONG
3-4+ Decades
Accuracy
Policy
relevance/
Interest
2
The merits of forecasting at different horizons
Good &
Improving
?
For
Nerds!
Poor & Little
Improvement
Usually Miss
Downturns
Fiscal & mopo
credibility
Quantifying
uncertainty …
tricky
Planning rather
than the Plan
Timing of cycle
less important
Natural horizon:
• Structural
reforms
• Mega-trends
like ageing
• Debt
sustainability
3. • All OECD + non-OECD G20 countries
• Core is production function for potential output
• Linked to short-term Economic Outlook projections
• Saving & Investment equilibrated through R
Long-term scenarios model: key features
3
5. Fiscal block: spending pressures
• Health spending per capita projections depend on
– Growth in real GDP per capita
– Change in the share of population aged 65+
– Baumol effect: 1.3% per year
• Pension expenditure from EC Ageing Report and S&P’s projections
• Other primary expditure constant on real per capita basis.
– Additional channel demographics public finances
– Structural reforms that boost employment rate fiscal dividends.
5
6. 50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Gross government debt, % of GDP
6
Fiscal rule stabilises debt-to-GDP ratio at
initial level using overall tax rate (eg USA)
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Primary revenue, % of GDP (overall tax rate)
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Primary balance, % of GDP
8. No institutional or policy reforms
Look at fiscal pressures building up
Reference point for reform scenarios
BASELINE SCENARIO
8
9. Demographic change weighs on growth in
OECD living standards
The positive contribution from a rising employment rate declines and the
contribution of the working-age population share turns negative
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060
Trend real GDP per capita growth in the OECD, %
9
10. Living standards converge slowly
• GDP per capita advances in all countries and gradually converges toward
those of the most advanced countries, but to varying degrees.
• Living standards in high-growth emerging market and Eastern European
converge most, driven by catch-up in trend labour efficiency,
• But GDP per capita in the BRIICS and some low-income OECD countries
remains below half that of United States in 2060.
0
40
80
120
160
200
0
40
80
120
160
200
IND
IDN
ZAF
COL
BRA
CRI
CHN
MEX
ARG
CHL
RUS
GRC
LVA
TUR
HUN
POL
PRT
EST
LTU
SVK
SVN
CZE
ISR
ESP
ITA
NZL
KOR
FRA
JPN
GBR
FIN
BEL
CAN
AUS
DEU
AUT
DNK
SWE
ISL
NLD
CHE
NOR
IRL
LUX
2018 2060
C. Real GDP per capita at 2010 Purchasing Power Parities, USA = 100
10
11. Fiscal pressure builds up
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
AUS
AUT
BEL
CAN
CHE
CZE
DEU
DNK
ESP
EST
FIN
FRA
GBR
GRC
HUN
IRL
ISL
ISR
ITA
JPN
KOR
LUX
LVA
NLD
NOR
NZL
POL
PRT
SVK
SVN
SWE
USA
Health expenditure Pension expenditure Other primary expenditure Other factors Total
Change in primary revenue necessary by 2060 to stabilise public debt ratios, % pts of potential GDP
Median OECD tax rate up 6½ % pts of GDP
11
12. 12
Summary of average historical effects on income
equality and output
Source: Agkun, O., B. Cournède and J. Fournier (2017), “The Effects of the tax
mix on inequality and growth”, OECD Economics Working Papers, No. 1447.
13. 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
VAT standard rate Revenue maximizing rate 95% Conf. Interval
Country-specific revenue-maximising VAT
standard rates & actual rates, % 2016
Source: Akgun, Bartolini and Cournède (2017) 13
14. Effective marginal effective tax rates of workers
with wages of 167% of the average and estimated
revenue-maximising rate
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Chile
Mexico
Korea
NewZealand
Japan
Switzerland
Canada
Poland
Austria
Estonia
Australia
UnitedStates
Latvia
Germany
Hungary
SlovakRepublic
Turkey
Iceland
CzechRepublic
UnitedKingdom
Israel
Netherlands
Norway
Ireland
Spain
Luxembourg
Slovenia
Denmark
Greece
Finland
Portugal
France
Italy
Belgium
Sweden
EMTR (2017, %) Revenue-maximising rate 95% confidence interval
Source: Akgun, Bartolini and Cournède (2017) 14
15. 1. Better governance & educational attainment in BRIICS
2. Competition-enhancing product market reforms in OECD
3. Flexibility-enhancing labour market reforms in OECD
4. Increase in pensionable age in OECD
5. Higher R&D spending in OECD
6. Higher public investment in OECD
7. Cost containment in health care sector in OECD
8. Higher average import tariffs in all countries
REFORM SCENARIOS
15
16. Labour market reforms could be most
beneficial to women and youth
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Youth (15-24)
Prime-age men (25-54)
Prime-age women (25-54)
Older workers(55-74)
Aggregate (15-74)
Active labour market policies Union bargaining Familybenefits Maternityleave Tax wedges
Impact of labour market reforms on OECD employment rates
Difference from baseline by 2040, % pts of labour force
A reform package to improve labour market policy settings in OECD countries
up to those of leading countries raises the aggregate employment rate by 6½
percentage points by 2040, mostly via higher youth and female employment.
16
17. Labour market reforms + health cost containment
would help alleviate projected fiscal pressures
Change in tax rate to stabilise public debt ratios,
difference from baseline in % pts of potential GDP
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
AUS
AUT
BEL
CAN
CHE
CZE
DEU
DNK
ESP
EST
FIN
FRA
GBR
GRC
HUN
IRL
ISL
ISR
ITA
JPN
KOR
LUX
LVA
NLD
NOR
NZL
POL
PRT
SVK
SVN
SWE
USA
Health expenditure New ALMP and family expenditure Other primary expenditure Other factors Total
Median reduction of 3½ % pts of GDP in tax pressure relative to baseline.
17
18. Change 2017 to 2030, % pts of the population aged 55 to 74
Note: Assumes minimum and normal retirement ages rise by two-thirds of the projected
increase in life expectancy at 65, unless they are already planned to rise as fast or faster
than this, in which case the chart shows a zero effect..
Increase in participation rate of older workers if
retirement ages rise by 2/3 of gains in life
expectancy
20. Another global slump would raise tax
pressure even with no potential output effect?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SVN
LVA
CZE
ESP
POL
CHE
GBR
HUN
ISR
ISL
LTU
SVK
JPN
NZL
DEU
BEL
NLD
FRA
IRL
KOR
CAN
AUS
EST
LUX
DNK
AUT
SWE
FIN
PRT
ITA
GRC
USA
Peak change in tax rate to stabilise public debt ratio with global
downturn in 2021, difference from baseline in % pts
20
21. What if interest rates have already
‘normalized’?
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
ITA
JPN
PRT
ESP
BEL
FRA
ISR
GBR
AUT
IRL
GRC
SVK
DEU
NLD
SVN
LVA
HUN
POL
LTU
CAN
CZE
DNK
USA
NZL
ISL
CHE
AUS
KOR
SWE
EST
LUX
FIN
Peak change in primary revenue necessary to stabilise public debt
ratio assuming lower path for interest rates, difference from
baseline in % pts of potential GDP
21
22. • Possible model improvements to fiscal side:
– More complete modelling of fiscal impacts of reforms
– Incorporate Laffer curve effects of taxation
– Better modelling of pensions
• Other Scenarios to explore in detail:
– Another GFC
– Different (r-g)
• YOUR SUGGESTIONS WELCOME !
Future work?
22
23. Agkun, O., B. Cournède and J. Fournier (2017), “The Effects of the tax mix on inequality and growth”,
OECD Economics Working Papers, No. 1447, OECD Publishing, Paris,
https://doi.org/10.1787/c57eaa14-en
Agkun, O., D. Bartolini and B. Cournède (2017), “The Capacity of Governments to Raise Taxes”,
OECD Economics Working Papers, No. 1407, OECD Publishing, Paris,
https://doi.org/10.1787/6bee2df9-en
Guillemette, Y. and D. Turner (2018), “The Long View: Scenarios for the World Economy to 2060”,
OECD Economic Policy Papers, No. 22, OECD, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b4f4e03e-en
Cavalleri, M. and Y. Guillemette (2017), “A revised approach to trend employment projections in long-
term scenarios”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1384, OECD, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/075f0153-en.
Guillemette, Y. et al. (2017), “A revised approach to productivity convergence in long-term scenarios”,
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1385, OECD, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/0b8947e3-en.
Guillemette, Y. and D. Turner (2017), “The fiscal projection framework in long-term scenarios”, OECD
Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1440, OECD, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/8eddfa18-en.
Guillemette, Y., A. de Mauro and D. Turner (2018), “Saving, investment, capital stock and current
account projections in long-term scenarios”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers,
No. 1461, OECD, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/aa519fc9-en
References
23