Presentation by Seyeol Yoon, Deputy Director, Public Safety Policy Office, Ministry of Public Safety and Security, Korea, at the 6th Workshop on Strategic Crisis Management in Geneva on 12-13 June 2017. The event was organised by the OECD and the Swiss Federal Chancellery, bringing together government crisis managers and practitioners from international organisations, industry and leading think-tanks to share strategic insights and cutting-edge policy responses. For further information please see http://www.oecd.org/governance/6th-workshop-strategic-crisis-management.htm
2. 1
Disaster & Safety policy of MPSS
Seongsu bridge collapse
Daegu subway fire Kyeongju mauna resort collapse
Sampoong department store collapse
Lessons from Large Scale Incidents
3. 1
Disaster & Safety policy of MPSS
Social disasters Natural disasters Maritime incidents
A safe society from disaster risks
Airpline accidents
Nuclear power incidents
Disaster Mitigation & Preparedness Disaster Response Disaster Recovery
5. 2
Infrastructure failure management system
- Infrastructure Diagnosis
Sampling Diagnosis for 21 types of Infrastructures(throughout the year)
- Coverage : 0.4 million facilities in Korea
- Participation : 0.7 milion of Public officers and experts
- 21 types of facilities with high possibility for large-scale disasters such as bridges, tunnels, subways, etc.
Road collapse Restoration
- Anybody can report infrastructure failure by using the app
- 3 million cases were reported by the public,
over 98% has been solved by the government
7. 3
Infrastructure failure management system - Recovery Policy
- Conduct joint drills to enhance emergency recovery capacity
- Establish facility-specific recovery plan
Obligatory insurance system for critical infrastructures
- Public facilities such as gas station, ferry terminal, underground shopping mall
8. 3
Infrastructure failure management system - Recovery Policy
- Coverage : 19 Central government department, 243 local goverment, 55 Public enterprise & Private Operator
* roadway, airport, habor, power plant and railroad etc.
- Evaluation index : 4 main index, 30 details
* Completeness of recovery plan, Participation level of disaster drills, Degree of Management
- The results of the evaluation(safety grades) go public.
9. 3
Infrastructure failure management system - Recovery Policy
Grade A 30%
Grade B 60%
Grade C 10%
Evaluation(Jan-May)
Publication of results(May)
Financial incetive
Cunsulting
- Improvement of disaster response capacity through evaluation
* 2014 : 76 point(evaluation average) 2016 : 86.4 point
* Seoul Sungdong gu : 2014(C grade) 2015(B grade) 2016(A grade)
10. 4
- M 5.1 (Sep. 12) → M 5.8 (Sep.19) → M 4.5 (Sep.21) → M3.5 (Sep.28)
* M : Magnitude
- Public infrastructure damage : $5.7 million
Individual damage : $3.4 million
- Roadways, reservoirs, troop camps, schools, cultural assets were destroyed
Case Report – The Kyung-ju earthquake (12 Sep 2016)
11. 4
Case Report – The Kyung-ju earthquake (12 Sep 2016)
- Investigation for the causes of disaster and the extent of damage
- Discussion with all participants
- Decisions for recovery plan and standards
were made through discussion
12. 4
- Special Subsidy Tax for Disaster Safety were provided quickly.
- Joint activities with Police, Troops, MPSS and volunteers
- Additional safety diagnosis by the faculties
Case Report – The Kyung-ju earthquake (12 Sep 2016)