SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 4
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Processes May Be Outsourced,
                           Maturity Cannot

                               Raju Oak, a Consultant, Researcher and Change Agent
                               specializing in Business Process Management, joins the
                               Process Excellence Network to discuss Business
                               Processes and Complexity.


PEX Network: To start, can you give me some background on your role?

Raju Oak: I have been a consultant, researcher and change agent in the last 27 years of
my career. I have been privileged to have witnessed the early days of IT in India, the
opening up of the economy, the great migration of intellectual resources, and the rise of
international process outsourcing, the growing understanding of process maturity and
Business Process Management through its many incarnations, seen through the eyes of
very different industries.
I have had the opportunity to work with the first few companies as they attempted and
scaled CMMI level 5. This gives me a unique perspective on process that I use to inform
my PhD research.
I help organizations develop their process maturity based upon the principle that
“processes may be outsourced, maturity cannot”.


PEX Network: Can you tell us a bit about how Process Excellence fits into the
culture at Kleinwort Benson (KB), where you worked previously?
Raju Oak: In a word, uneasily. In common with much of the industry, KB clearly aspires
to Process Excellence. However, like many similar organizations, it is challenged in the
following ways:
   •   Priority: It has been a turbulent couple of years, with multiple changes of ownership and
       the implementation of varying systems replacement strategies. Consequently, while the
       concept of process excellence has always been supported in principle, there has been
       little management bandwidth and airtime afforded to the reality of Process Excellence.
   •   Clarity: The definition of Process Excellence is at best ambiguous. It focuses at different
       times on different operational characteristics such as ‘no mistakes’ (quality), ‘minimizing
       cost’ (efficiency), ‘maximizing resource capability’ (effectiveness), ‘doing that bit more’
       (flexibility), ‘reducing risk’ (transparency), ‘predictability’ (control) and ‘performance’
       (throughput, responsiveness). It is driven at different times variously by internal
       departments, the front office, specific customer needs, regulatory events and owner
       aspirations. The focus tends to be fleeting and fragmentary so that local improvements
       can sometimes propagate undesirable changes in the global process picture.
   •   Visibility: The process space in KB is not really mapped in a complete or sustainable
       way. Because of the variety of products and services, processes tend to be overlapped
       and interdependent with a high degree of resource sharing and distributed accountability.
•   Approach: There is little consensus as regards the process of achieving Process
       Excellence as indeed the ownership of the process. This is largely a consequence of the
       issues of priority, clarity and visibility already mentioned.
   •   It is important to point out; however, that KB is hardly unique in this regard. Indeed, in the
       current environment, it would be unusual to find a financial services organization not
       facing challenges.


PEX Network: How do organizations typically respond to business process
complexity and in what key ways can this be improved?
Raju Oak: This was the subject of my last presentation to the BPE in Financial Services,
and this largely depends upon two factors:
   1. Whether the organization can indeed differentiate between complex and
      complicated processes
   2. The prevailing mindset in the organization.
The former requires a degree of process maturity to have already been achieved. The
latter is dictated by the dominant organization mindset.
Organizations with the mindset:
   •   That the organization is a machine - tend to deny complexity, and label the
       consequences as flaws in someone’s competence;
   •   That complexity is a necessary characteristic of organizations - tend to suffer the
       consequences and accept domination;
   •   That the organization is a self-managing organism - tend to ignore complexity as
       long as they can hoping it will somehow resolve itself;
   •   That the organization is a constant flux and transformation process - try to control
       complexity, seeing it as a temporary state to be tamed or simplified;
   •   That the organization is an information-processing brain which can think its way
       out of complexity - recognize complexity well but avoid it and find a way to survive
       without getting in its way;
   •   That the organization is essentially a culture pick and choose opportunities - to
       build a bridge over complexity (and often charge you to cross it safely)

Addressing complexity involves three R’s, Recognition, Resourcing & Response:
   •   Recognition is key, because complexity is different and invidious. It doesn’t come
       organized in neat packages that can be labeled and delegated for resolution.
   •   Resourcing is important because resources skilled at managing complicatedness,
       however large, are rarely appropriate for managing complexity.
   •   Response is important because complexity is more tractable to certain types of
       response whereas conventional responses tend to further increase complexity.


PEX Network: Can you give some examples of initiatives to deal with complexity -
outlining the challenges and solutions used to overcome them?
Raju Oak: Complexity tends to arise in contexts characterized by:
   •   A network of related entities;
•   That have behaviors determined by (often dynamic and recursive) relationships
       which can in turn depend on other relationships;
   •   That all tend to share resources;
   •   That are characterized by distributed ownership; and
   •   That pursues different (often conflicting) outcomes at the micro and the macro
       levels.
   Examples are:
   •   Within organizations - Strategy and Performance Management, Enterprise
       Architecture and IT Asset Management, Change and Transformation,
       Compliance, etc…
   •   Within industries - complex value chains (consider the payments industry), large
       program management, administration of complex financial/legal structures, etc.
       Successful initiatives dealing with complexity are characterized by:
   •   Clarity on outcomes;
   •   Emphasizing understanding before transformation;
   •   Multiple parallel but coordinated actions in a divergence/convergence learning
       pattern;
   •   Focus on building capability in managing complexity rather than purely on
       complexity resolution


PEX Network: What top tips can you offer to businesses looking to avoid common
pitfalls?
Raju Oak: My top tips would be:
   •   It is very important to recognize complexity as it is easy to confuse it with
       complicatedness;
   •   Managing complexity requires a very different approach as compared to
       managing complicated processes;
   •   Less is often more when dealing with complexity;
   •   Stability and understanding must precede predictability and change when
       planning transformations involving complexity; and
   •   Understanding is continuous and dynamic. What one understood yesterday may
       not be relevant today.


PEX Network: And finally, what is the one take-away that you would like attendees
at the Summit to get from your session?
Raju Oak: At the heart of complex processes (and indeed complexity) is the dynamic
interdependence of its constituents, and the understanding and visibility of those
interdependencies must precede any successful attempt to manage complex processes.
About PEX Network
                I invite you to join as a member of the PEX Network Group
                http://tinyurl.com/3hwakem, you will have access to Key Leaders
                Globally, Events, Webinars, Presentations, Articles, Case Studies, Blog
                Discussions, White Papers, and Tools and Templates. To access this
                free content please take 2 minutes for a 1 time FREE registration at
                http://tiny.cc/tpkd0
PEX Network, a division of IQPC, facilitates access to a wealth of relevant content for
Process Excellence, Lean, and Six Sigma practitioners. Further enhanced with an online
community of your peers, we will provide you with the tools and resources to help you
perform more effective and efficiently, while enhancing the quality operations within your
organization. As our industry becomes more and more dependent on the Web for
information, PEXNetwork.com has been developed to provide Six Sigma professionals
with instant access to information. Leveraging our strength and foundation in education,
IQPC and the Process Excellence Network are uniquely positioned to provide a
comprehensive library of webcasts gathered from our events, as well as exclusive
content from leaders in the industry.

Más contenido relacionado

Más de Nat Evans

Más de Nat Evans (17)

Outside In Steve Towers
Outside In Steve TowersOutside In Steve Towers
Outside In Steve Towers
 
Qaa Paul Nelson
Qaa   Paul NelsonQaa   Paul Nelson
Qaa Paul Nelson
 
Scatter Diagrams
Scatter DiagramsScatter Diagrams
Scatter Diagrams
 
Pareto Charts
Pareto ChartsPareto Charts
Pareto Charts
 
Histograms
HistogramsHistograms
Histograms
 
Dot Plots
Dot PlotsDot Plots
Dot Plots
 
Cause & Effect Diagrams
Cause & Effect DiagramsCause & Effect Diagrams
Cause & Effect Diagrams
 
Affinity Diagrams
Affinity DiagramsAffinity Diagrams
Affinity Diagrams
 
Six Sigma Wiife
Six Sigma WiifeSix Sigma Wiife
Six Sigma Wiife
 
Project Charter Action Template
Project Charter Action TemplateProject Charter Action Template
Project Charter Action Template
 
The Path To Operational Excellence 5 Components Of Success
The Path To Operational Excellence   5 Components Of SuccessThe Path To Operational Excellence   5 Components Of Success
The Path To Operational Excellence 5 Components Of Success
 
Creating Winning Businesses Deming’S System Of Profound Knowledge
Creating Winning Businesses   Deming’S System Of Profound KnowledgeCreating Winning Businesses   Deming’S System Of Profound Knowledge
Creating Winning Businesses Deming’S System Of Profound Knowledge
 
Perspectives On Business Process Management
Perspectives On Business Process ManagementPerspectives On Business Process Management
Perspectives On Business Process Management
 
A Formula For Calculating The Roi Of Bpm
A Formula For Calculating The Roi Of BpmA Formula For Calculating The Roi Of Bpm
A Formula For Calculating The Roi Of Bpm
 
Does This Make My Process Look Fat
Does This Make My Process Look FatDoes This Make My Process Look Fat
Does This Make My Process Look Fat
 
The New Frontier For Business Agility Intelligent Bpm
The New Frontier For Business Agility   Intelligent BpmThe New Frontier For Business Agility   Intelligent Bpm
The New Frontier For Business Agility Intelligent Bpm
 
Achieving Enterprise Process Mobility With Sequence Kinetics
Achieving Enterprise Process Mobility With Sequence KineticsAchieving Enterprise Process Mobility With Sequence Kinetics
Achieving Enterprise Process Mobility With Sequence Kinetics
 

Processes May Be Outsourced Maturity Cannot

  • 1. Processes May Be Outsourced, Maturity Cannot Raju Oak, a Consultant, Researcher and Change Agent specializing in Business Process Management, joins the Process Excellence Network to discuss Business Processes and Complexity. PEX Network: To start, can you give me some background on your role? Raju Oak: I have been a consultant, researcher and change agent in the last 27 years of my career. I have been privileged to have witnessed the early days of IT in India, the opening up of the economy, the great migration of intellectual resources, and the rise of international process outsourcing, the growing understanding of process maturity and Business Process Management through its many incarnations, seen through the eyes of very different industries. I have had the opportunity to work with the first few companies as they attempted and scaled CMMI level 5. This gives me a unique perspective on process that I use to inform my PhD research. I help organizations develop their process maturity based upon the principle that “processes may be outsourced, maturity cannot”. PEX Network: Can you tell us a bit about how Process Excellence fits into the culture at Kleinwort Benson (KB), where you worked previously? Raju Oak: In a word, uneasily. In common with much of the industry, KB clearly aspires to Process Excellence. However, like many similar organizations, it is challenged in the following ways: • Priority: It has been a turbulent couple of years, with multiple changes of ownership and the implementation of varying systems replacement strategies. Consequently, while the concept of process excellence has always been supported in principle, there has been little management bandwidth and airtime afforded to the reality of Process Excellence. • Clarity: The definition of Process Excellence is at best ambiguous. It focuses at different times on different operational characteristics such as ‘no mistakes’ (quality), ‘minimizing cost’ (efficiency), ‘maximizing resource capability’ (effectiveness), ‘doing that bit more’ (flexibility), ‘reducing risk’ (transparency), ‘predictability’ (control) and ‘performance’ (throughput, responsiveness). It is driven at different times variously by internal departments, the front office, specific customer needs, regulatory events and owner aspirations. The focus tends to be fleeting and fragmentary so that local improvements can sometimes propagate undesirable changes in the global process picture. • Visibility: The process space in KB is not really mapped in a complete or sustainable way. Because of the variety of products and services, processes tend to be overlapped and interdependent with a high degree of resource sharing and distributed accountability.
  • 2. Approach: There is little consensus as regards the process of achieving Process Excellence as indeed the ownership of the process. This is largely a consequence of the issues of priority, clarity and visibility already mentioned. • It is important to point out; however, that KB is hardly unique in this regard. Indeed, in the current environment, it would be unusual to find a financial services organization not facing challenges. PEX Network: How do organizations typically respond to business process complexity and in what key ways can this be improved? Raju Oak: This was the subject of my last presentation to the BPE in Financial Services, and this largely depends upon two factors: 1. Whether the organization can indeed differentiate between complex and complicated processes 2. The prevailing mindset in the organization. The former requires a degree of process maturity to have already been achieved. The latter is dictated by the dominant organization mindset. Organizations with the mindset: • That the organization is a machine - tend to deny complexity, and label the consequences as flaws in someone’s competence; • That complexity is a necessary characteristic of organizations - tend to suffer the consequences and accept domination; • That the organization is a self-managing organism - tend to ignore complexity as long as they can hoping it will somehow resolve itself; • That the organization is a constant flux and transformation process - try to control complexity, seeing it as a temporary state to be tamed or simplified; • That the organization is an information-processing brain which can think its way out of complexity - recognize complexity well but avoid it and find a way to survive without getting in its way; • That the organization is essentially a culture pick and choose opportunities - to build a bridge over complexity (and often charge you to cross it safely) Addressing complexity involves three R’s, Recognition, Resourcing & Response: • Recognition is key, because complexity is different and invidious. It doesn’t come organized in neat packages that can be labeled and delegated for resolution. • Resourcing is important because resources skilled at managing complicatedness, however large, are rarely appropriate for managing complexity. • Response is important because complexity is more tractable to certain types of response whereas conventional responses tend to further increase complexity. PEX Network: Can you give some examples of initiatives to deal with complexity - outlining the challenges and solutions used to overcome them? Raju Oak: Complexity tends to arise in contexts characterized by: • A network of related entities;
  • 3. That have behaviors determined by (often dynamic and recursive) relationships which can in turn depend on other relationships; • That all tend to share resources; • That are characterized by distributed ownership; and • That pursues different (often conflicting) outcomes at the micro and the macro levels. Examples are: • Within organizations - Strategy and Performance Management, Enterprise Architecture and IT Asset Management, Change and Transformation, Compliance, etc… • Within industries - complex value chains (consider the payments industry), large program management, administration of complex financial/legal structures, etc. Successful initiatives dealing with complexity are characterized by: • Clarity on outcomes; • Emphasizing understanding before transformation; • Multiple parallel but coordinated actions in a divergence/convergence learning pattern; • Focus on building capability in managing complexity rather than purely on complexity resolution PEX Network: What top tips can you offer to businesses looking to avoid common pitfalls? Raju Oak: My top tips would be: • It is very important to recognize complexity as it is easy to confuse it with complicatedness; • Managing complexity requires a very different approach as compared to managing complicated processes; • Less is often more when dealing with complexity; • Stability and understanding must precede predictability and change when planning transformations involving complexity; and • Understanding is continuous and dynamic. What one understood yesterday may not be relevant today. PEX Network: And finally, what is the one take-away that you would like attendees at the Summit to get from your session? Raju Oak: At the heart of complex processes (and indeed complexity) is the dynamic interdependence of its constituents, and the understanding and visibility of those interdependencies must precede any successful attempt to manage complex processes. About PEX Network I invite you to join as a member of the PEX Network Group http://tinyurl.com/3hwakem, you will have access to Key Leaders Globally, Events, Webinars, Presentations, Articles, Case Studies, Blog Discussions, White Papers, and Tools and Templates. To access this free content please take 2 minutes for a 1 time FREE registration at http://tiny.cc/tpkd0
  • 4. PEX Network, a division of IQPC, facilitates access to a wealth of relevant content for Process Excellence, Lean, and Six Sigma practitioners. Further enhanced with an online community of your peers, we will provide you with the tools and resources to help you perform more effective and efficiently, while enhancing the quality operations within your organization. As our industry becomes more and more dependent on the Web for information, PEXNetwork.com has been developed to provide Six Sigma professionals with instant access to information. Leveraging our strength and foundation in education, IQPC and the Process Excellence Network are uniquely positioned to provide a comprehensive library of webcasts gathered from our events, as well as exclusive content from leaders in the industry.