1. Performance Evaluation of Plate-fin and Pin-fin
Heat Sinks and Design Optimization of Dynamic
Cold Plate (DCP)
By
Parth Jayeshkumar Soni
MS Mechanical Engineering Graduate Student
The University of Texas at Arlington
Date:03/21/2016
Thesis Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
Committee Members: Dr. A. Haji-Sheikh
Dr. Miguel AAmaya
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
1
2. Why Liquid Cooling…
Power Trends
https://www.cisl.ucar.edu/nar/2006/1.0.sc.jsp
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
2
3. Focus
Study 1: Design Validation of Dynamic Cold Plate
(DCP)
Study 2: Parametric Study and Performance
Comparison of Pin-fin and Plate-fin Heat Sinks for
the Application of Oil Immersed Cooling
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
3
4. Focus
Study 1: Design Validation of Dynamic Cold Plate
(DCP)
Study 2: Parametric Study and Performance Comparison
of Pin-fin and Plate-fin Heat Sinks for the Application of
Oil Immersed Cooling
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
4
5. Original Cold Plate(OCP) vs Dynamic Cold
Plate(DCP)
One inlet one outlet
Same water flow for all heat generating components
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
5
Separate inlet and outlet for different compartment inside cold
plate
Different flow for different compartment
6. What is DCP?
Dynamic cold plate is extended
version of original cold plate
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
6
CAD model Fin placement
Referance heat generating platform
7. Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
7
Dimensions (in mm)
ASICs – 14.71 × 13.31 ×
0.8
FPGA – 10.5 × 12.7 × 0.8
Reference Platform
Component Quantity Power(W)
Base 1 -
ASIC 1(B1) 40
ASIC 11 5
FPGA 1 5
LICA 137 0
ASIC:-Application-Specific Integrated Circuit
FPGA:-Field-Programmable Gate Array
• MCM serves as basis for design of solution
- Power dissipation of 485W over 78mm × 78mm
8. CFD Modeling of DCP
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
8
10. Model of Dynamic Cold Plate
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
10
Dimensions cold late
Foot print : 90*90 mm
Base height: 5mm
Fin dimensions
Thickness: 0.5 mm
Height: 2mm
Length: 29mm
Pitch: 1mm
Dimensions of cover
Footprint : 90*90 mm
Height: 15mm
Ø of inlet outlet: 7mm
Dimensions from Experimental setup
11. Purpose of Study
To visualize the flow in side the cold plate
To validate of the CFD model
For, Optimization of flow inside cold plate
For, parametric study of DCP
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
11
12. Mesh
Unstructured mesh
No of elements: 11,15,321
Shape of elements: Tetra elements
Mesh algorithm: Robust (octree)
top-down meshing approach
top-down meshing approach
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
12
13. Mesh Density
Fin surface: 0.001 m
Fin thickness: 0.005m
Other surfaces: 1m
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
13
14. Analysis
Models in fluent
Energy equation
Turbulent model: K-epsilon turbulence model
Materials used in the modeling
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
14
15. K-epsilon Turbulence Model
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
15
Turbulent kinetic energy k
Eddy Dissipation ε
10% turbulent intensity from length scale model (Fluent
user guide)
16. Boundary Conditions
4 inlets: Velocity inlets
Velocity of water: 4 lpm
(Reference experimental data)
Temperature: Ambient
Pressure : 3000 pa
4 outlets: Pressure outlets
No back pressure
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
16
19. Temperature Distribution
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
19
• This figure shows
the heat spread on
the copper plate
• As temperature of
B1 increases
neighboring chips
also shows some
higher temperature
20. Pressure Drop
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
20
Pumping power=Pressure drop *
Flow rate
Pumping power= 2.2 W(CFD result)
Pumping power=2.76 w(Experimental result)
22. Conclusion
Thus, from the CFD results this model is in good agreement
with experimental results
Hence, this model can be used for the further study of
optimization and parametric study
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
22
23. Future Work
Study 1:
This model can be used to optimize the design of the DCP
Cover design optimization for better flow rate
Parametric study and documentation of different fins and
different cover design
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
23
24. Focus
Study 1:Design Validation of Dynamic Cold Plate (DCP)
Study 2: Parametric study and performance
comparison of pin fin and plate fin heat sinks for the
application of oil immersed cooling
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
24
25. Study 1
Parametric study and
performance comparison of pin
fin and plate fin heat sinks for the
application of oil immersed
cooling for open compute
generation one server
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
25
26. Previous Study
Validation of the model using the identical boundary
condition generated in experiment
Documentation of parametric study and the performance of
the parallel plate heat sink for the oil immersed application
Optimization of the parallel plate heat sink design
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
26
27. Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
27
Evaluate the performance of pin fin and plate fin heat
sink
Compare the thermal resistance of both the heat sinks
with current heat sink in use for open compute server
Motivation
28. Methodology
Place plate fin and pin fin heat sink in place of the parallel
plate heat sink on the validated model
Parametric study of heat sinks for same condition as
experimental set up
Base height
Pin thickness and radius
Flow rate
Documentation of the performance of both heat sinks
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
28
29. Types of Heat Sinks
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
29
http://img.diytrade.com/cdimg/720673/627215
7/0/1214899819/pin_fin_heat_sink.jpg
http://www.enertron-
inc.com/images/resources/forged/forged_2.JPGhttp://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Ite
m=N82E16816101827
Parallel plate heat sink Pin fin heat sink Plate fin heat sink
30. Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
30 Material Properties
PCB, Ram- FR-4 epoxy resin
Density- 1900 kg/m3
Thermal conductivity – 0.17 W/m K
Specific heat – 749 J/kg K
Heat sink - Aluminum
Density- 2700 kg/m3
Thermal conductivity-218 W/m K
Specific heat- 900 J/Kg K
31. Mineral Oil Properties31
𝜇 = 𝐶1 ∗ 𝐸𝑥𝑝
2797.3
𝑇 + 273.2
STE Oil Company data sheets and
MSDS:http://www.steoil.com/msds-tech-data
Density – 1680 Kg/m3
Thermal conductivity – 0.13 J/kg K
Specific heat – 1680
Re: 4.6
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
32. 32 Flow Conditions
• Inlet temperature: 30˚C
• Volume rate : 1 lpm
• Velocity : 0.00115 m/s
• Pressure : 6 psi
• Re : 13.6
Volume flow rate = Area of inlet ×
Velocity
Re=
𝜌𝑣𝐷
𝝁
𝐷 =
2𝑔ℎ
𝑔+ℎ
g= channel width
h=fin height
Pumping power= pressure drop * mass
flow rate
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
33. CFD Set Up
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
33
Heat sink data:
• Foot print- 10 cm ×7 cm
• Base height – 0.6 cm
• Total height – 3.1 cm
• Number of fins – 25
• Fin radius – 0.6 cm
Model data
Cabinet
Footprint: 35*35 cm
Ram
Dimension: 14*3*8 cmHeat sink data:
• Foot print- 10 cm ×7 cm
• Base height – 0.6 cm
• Total height – 3.1 cm
• Number of fins – 25
• Fin thickness – 0.4 cm
34. Why Fixed Flow Rate
Pressure drop in air cooling application is around 4
Pa
For parallel plate heat sink in in oil cooling
application pressure drop around 0.9 Pa
Where as, in oil cooling application pressure drop is
around 0.032 Pa
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
34
Pumping power=Pressure drop * Flow rate
Advantage of fix Flow rate concept
• Less time consuming
• Easy to use
36. Grid independent Study
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
36
Inlet Temperature - 30° C
Volume rate – 1 lpm
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
Thermalresistance(c/kg.k)
No of nodes
Chart Title
Plate fin pin fin
37. Flow Rate vs Thermal Resistance
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
37
Inlet Temperature - 30° C
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Thermalresistance(c/kg.k)
Flow rate(lpm)
Flow rate vs Thermal resistance
pin fin
plate fin
38. Base Height vs Thermal Resistance
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
38
Inlet Temperature - 30° C
Volume rate – 1 lpm
0.935
0.94
0.945
0.95
0.955
0.96
0.965
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Thermalresistance(c/kg.k)
Base height (cm)
Base height vs Thermal resistance
39. Fin Height and Fin Radius vs Thermal Resistance
for Pin Fin Heat Sink
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
39
40. Fin Height And Fin Thickness vs Thermal
Resistance for Plate fin heat sink
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
40
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5 0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.3
0.32
'C:UsersParthDesktopNew folder (2)project-16resultPin fin2.dat'
Height of fin (cm)
Thickness of fin (cm)
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.3
0.32
41. Conclusion
Base height: Optimize base height can be 0.6cm as after
that the thermal resistance is not varying much.
Fin height: Fin height shows the optimum result at 2.5 to 3 cm
as after that flow passes through lease
resistance path
Fin radius or thickness:
recommended thickness of the fin can be 0.4mm to 0.6 mm
(Plate fin) as after that resistance increases and performance
decreases
Recommended radius of the fin can be 0.5 to 0.6 mm as after
that flow resistance increases and performance decreases
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
41
42. Future Work
Performance of the other available heat sinks can be
documented for the same model as well as higher
generation servers
This same can be studied for the fix pumping power
method
Parth Soni Advisor: Dr. Dereje Agonafer
42