Until recently we were the sole designers, alone in the driving seat making all the decisions. But, we have created a world of complexity way beyond human ability to understand, control, and govern. Machines now do more trades than humans on stock markets, they control our power, water, gas and food supplies, manage our elevators, microclimates, automobiles and transport systems, and manufacture almost everything.
It should come as no surprise that machines are now designing machines.
1. When Machines
Design
Wachines!
Peter Cochrane
www.cochrane.org.uk
1
2. Where is...
2001: A Space Odyssey
Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke 1968
2
3. Where is...
In 1970 it was 30 years in the future
2001: A Space Odyssey
Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke 1968
2
4. Where is...
In 1970 it was 30 years in the future
In 2000 it was 30 years in the future
2001: A Space Odyssey
Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke 1968
2
5. Where is...
In 1970 it was 30 years in the future
In 2000 it was 30 years in the future
In 2010 it was 30 year in the future
2001: A Space Odyssey
Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke 1968
2
11. After 1.8Bn years
we still can’t…
…adequately describe,
define, quantify or
understand intelligence
7
12. It is just another word that
lacks any full or adequate
descr iption, definition,
quantification, measure or
meaning...
8
13. It is just another word that
lacks any full or adequate
descr iption, definition,
quantification, measure or
meaning...
• Life
• Intelligence
• Complexity
• Scaleability
• Value
• Think(ing)
8
14. And wordy descriptions of the form...
“The faculty of rational behaviour”
“An ability to create order out of chaos”
...do not help one iota !
9
15. Unfortunately all attempts
to quantify and measure
IQ have turned out to be
a waste of time !
Despite the dire warnings
about the limitations of his test
and the way it can be applied it
is still used today !
10
16. On the other hand this would not be a good
answer !
Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything from the supercomputer,
Deep Thought, specially built for this purpose. It takes Deep Thought 7½ million years to compute
and check the answer, which turns out to be 42. Unfortunately, The Ultimate Question itself is
unknown.
Douglas Adams: The Hitchhikers Guide to The Universe
11
31. Is IBM Watson Intelligent ?
e!
n gin
e
ch
ar
se
fast
a
in ly
r ta
s ce
t i
I
21
32. Is IBM Watson Intelligent ?
e! r!
gin ni se
e n g
ch co
r re
s ea ak
as
t spe
f
a od
in ly
a go
rt a ly
ce in
i s ta
It c er
is
It
21
33. Is IBM Watson Intelligent ?
e! r!
gin ni se t!
e n g x
co te
rch re c on
s ea e ak e
fa st sp som
a o d ng
in ly go d oi
a a ly
e rt in ly in
c
rt a ta
It
is
ce cer
is is
It It
21
35. Man - Machine conflict is with us !
!
n ce
lli ge
inte
hi ne
ac
m
an
h um
in ed
b
Com
22
36. Remembering stuff ,
knowing algorithms,
creating the new and
novel ?
Remembering stuff
& applying a
rehearsed algorithm?
23
37. Remembering stuff ,
knowing algorithms,
creating the new and
novel ?
h is!
t
l ike
k ids
w ith Remembering stuff
ol
ho & applying a
sc
to
en
t rehearsed algorithm?
Iw
23
38. is!
th
l ike Remembering stuff ,
pl e knowing algorithms,
p eo
w ith creating the new and
rk
wo novel ?
o
ott
Ig
h is!
t
l ike
k ids
w ith Remembering stuff
ol
ho & applying a
sc
to
en
t rehearsed algorithm?
Iw
23
39. What we now know about intelligence
Intelligence demands:
- data...lots of data
- context...many examples
- cognition...algorithms(+) ?
- sensory systems
24
40. My analysis says Comparative Intelligence
looks like this:
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ( 1 + PM )]
S = Sensor, A = Actuator, P = Processor, M = Memory
For detail GOTO: http://www.cochrane.org.uk/publications/
25
42. Observations on:
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ( 1 + PM )]
With zero processor power intelligence is still possible
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ]
26
43. Observations on:
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ( 1 + PM )]
With zero processor power intelligence is still possible
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ]
With zero memory power intelligence is still possible
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ]
26
44. Observations on:
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ( 1 + PM )]
With zero processor power intelligence is still possible
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ]
With zero memory power intelligence is still possible
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ]
With zero sensor and/or actuator power intelligence is impossible
Ic ~ k log2[1] = 0
26
45. Relative Intelligence
Ic
Ir =
Flops (or machine cycles)
Ic ~ k log2[1 + KAS ( 1 + PM )]
27
48. Key conclusion:
Intelligence grows logarithmically and not linearly !
The singularity event isn’t going to happen just yet !
The assumption that is is is based on I ~ PM growth looks to be wrong
Kurzweil et al
29
61. A planetary
walker not by
the hand of
man....and not
an evolutionary
step on from
any existing
design!
41
62. Science fiction & Hollywood are mostly
apocalyptic on the topic:
42
63. Science fiction & Hollywood are mostly
apocalyptic on the topic:
42
64. Science fiction & Hollywood are mostly
apocalyptic on the topic:
42
65. Science fiction & Hollywood are mostly
apocalyptic on the topic:
42
66. Science fiction & Hollywood are mostly
apocalyptic on the topic:
…but the reality is quite different..so far!
42
67. AI is more than a useful tool, it is now an
essential element of our future:
- Robotics
- Cybernetics
- Complex Systems
-
- Smart Materials
- Genetics
- Proteomics
- Nano - Bio Systems
43