SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 15
R C S D I T
Landmark Supreme
Court Cases
Marbury v Madison 1803
Judicial Review
Marbury v. Madison, arguably the most important case
in Supreme Court history, was the first U.S. Supreme
Court case to apply the principle of "judicial review" --
the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in
conflict with the Constitution. Written in 1803 by Chief
Justice John Marshall, the decision played a key role in
making the Supreme Court a separate branch of
government on par with Congress and the executive.
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
“Elastic Clause”
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court
ruled that Congress had implied powers under the
Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of
the Constitution to create the Second Bank of the
United States and that the state of Maryland lacked
the power to tax the Bank. Arguably Chief Justice John
Marshall's finest opinion, McCulloch not only gave
Congress broad discretionary power to implement the
enumerated powers, but also repudiated, in ringing
language, the radical states' rights arguments
presented by counsel for Maryland.
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
Supremacy of National Laws
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) vastly expanded the powers
of Congress through a single clause in the Constitution:
the Commerce Clause of Article I, Section 8. The Court
ruled that under that clause Congress had powers to
regulate any aspect of commerce that crossed state
lines, including modes of transportation, and that such
regulation preempted conflicting regulation by the
states. Since Gibbons, the Commerce Clause has
provided the basis for sweeping congressional power
over a multitude of national issues.
Dred Scott v Sanford 1857
Slaves are property
Blacks are not citizens
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided
1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of
African descent, whether free or slave, were not
American citizens and could not sue in federal court.
The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to
ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court
declared that the rights of slaveowners were
constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment
because slaves were categorized as property.
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
Separate but Equal
In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court
considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law
passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages
for the white and colored races." The law, which
required that all passenger railways provide separate
cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be
equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black
cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses
attending children of the other race"), and penalized
passengers or railway employees for violating its terms.
Schenck v US 1919
Limits Free Speech
In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court
invented the famous "clear and present danger" test to
determine when a state could constitutionally limit an
individual's free speech rights under the First
Amendment. In reviewing the conviction of a man
charged with distributing provocative flyers to draftees
of World War I, the Court asserted that, in certain
contexts, words can create a "clear and present
danger" that Congress may constitutionally prohibit.
While the ruling has since been overturned, Schenck is
still significant for creating the context-based
balancing tests used in reviewing freedom of speech
challenges.
Korematsu v US 1944
Limit Civil Liberties During War
Early in World War II, on February 19, 1942, President
Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, granting
the U.S. military the power to ban tens of thousands of
American citizens of Japanese ancestry from areas
deemed critical to domestic security. Promptly exercising
the power so bestowed, the military then issued an order
banning "all persons of Japanese ancestry, both alien and
non-alien" from a designated coastal area stretching from
Washington State to southern Arizona, and hastily set up
internment camps to hold the Japanese Americans for
the duration of the war. In defiance of the order, Fred
Korematsu, an American-born citizen of Japanese
descent, refused to leave his home in San Leandro,
California. Duly convicted, he appealed, and in 1944 his
case reached the Supreme Court. A 6-3 majority on the
Court upheld Korematsu's conviction.
Brown v Board of Education 1954
Desegregates schools
Overturns Plessy v Ferguson
Brown v. Board of Education (1954), now
acknowledged as one of the greatest Supreme Court
decisions of the 20th century, unanimously held that
the racial segregation of children in public schools
violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment. Although the decision did not succeed
in fully desegregating public education in the United
States, it put the Constitution on the side of racial
equality and galvanized the nascent civil rights
movement into a full revolution.
Engel v Vitale 1962
Prayer in School Violates the 1st Amendment
This case determined that it is unconstitutional for
state officials to compose an official school
prayer and encourage its recitation in public
schools. The case was brought by the families of
public school students in New Hyde Park, New
York who complained that the voluntary prayer
written by the state board of regents to "Almighty
God" contradicted their religious beliefs. They
were supported by groups opposed to the school
prayer including rabbinical organizations, Ethical
Culture, and Judaic organizations.
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Right to Lawyer
In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court
ruled that the Constitution requires the states to
provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants
charged with serious offenses who cannot afford
lawyers themselves.
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Police must Inform Accused of their Rights
In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled
that detained criminal suspects, prior to police
questioning, must be informed of their constitutional
right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Roe v Wade 1971
Gave Women the Right to Abortion
Roe v. Wade (1973) ruled unconstitutional a state law
that banned abortions except to save the life of the
mother. The Court ruled that the states were forbidden
from outlawing or regulating any aspect of abortion
performed during the first trimester of pregnancy,
could only enact abortion regulations reasonably
related to maternal health in the second and third
trimesters, and could enact abortion laws protecting
the life of the fetus only in the third trimester. Even then,
an exception had to be made to protect the life of the
mother.
New York Times v US
Freedom of the press
National security not threatened by Pentagon Papers
This ruling made it possible for the New York Times
and Washington Post newspapers to publish the
then-classified Pentagon Papers without risk of
government censorship or punishment.
President Richard Nixon had claimed executive
authority to force the Times to suspend publication
of classified information in its possession. The question
before the court was whether the constitutional
freedom of the press, guaranteed by the First
Amendment, was subordinate to a claimed need of
the executive branch of government to maintain the
secrecy of information. The Supreme Court ruled that
the First Amendment did protect the right of the New
York Times to print the materials.
Regents of U of California v Bakke 1978
Affirmative Action Programs Constitutional
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke
(1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university's
use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was
unconstitutional, but a school's use of "affirmative
action" to accept more minority applicants was
constitutional in some circumstances.

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Separation of powers
Separation of powersSeparation of powers
Separation of powersraj kishor
 
Powers of the president
Powers of the presidentPowers of the president
Powers of the presidentezasso
 
Presantation, Separation of uk constitution
Presantation, Separation of uk constitutionPresantation, Separation of uk constitution
Presantation, Separation of uk constitutionS M Rubel Rana
 
Bill of right under american constitution
Bill of right under american constitution Bill of right under american constitution
Bill of right under american constitution gagan deep
 
Congress Powerpoint
Congress PowerpointCongress Powerpoint
Congress PowerpointMike Evans
 
Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. MadisonMarbury v. Madison
Marbury v. MadisonEmily Holmes
 
Evolution of judicial review in united states of america
Evolution of judicial review in united states of americaEvolution of judicial review in united states of america
Evolution of judicial review in united states of americaArushi Shrivastava
 
The Executive Branch
The Executive BranchThe Executive Branch
The Executive BranchJerome Manley
 
Checks and Balances
Checks and BalancesChecks and Balances
Checks and BalancesJames Woda
 
The civil-rights-movement
The civil-rights-movementThe civil-rights-movement
The civil-rights-movementHuong Million
 
Second Amendment
Second AmendmentSecond Amendment
Second Amendmentlisajurs
 
Korematsu vs. United States
Korematsu vs. United StatesKorematsu vs. United States
Korematsu vs. United StatesTodd Beach
 
elections in usa
elections in usaelections in usa
elections in usahiratufail
 
civil liberties & civil rights
civil liberties & civil rights civil liberties & civil rights
civil liberties & civil rights wtidwell
 
6 us political system
6 us political system6 us political system
6 us political systemmrmarr
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Separation of powers
Separation of powersSeparation of powers
Separation of powers
 
Powers of the president
Powers of the presidentPowers of the president
Powers of the president
 
Presantation, Separation of uk constitution
Presantation, Separation of uk constitutionPresantation, Separation of uk constitution
Presantation, Separation of uk constitution
 
Bill of right under american constitution
Bill of right under american constitution Bill of right under american constitution
Bill of right under american constitution
 
Congress Powerpoint
Congress PowerpointCongress Powerpoint
Congress Powerpoint
 
Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. MadisonMarbury v. Madison
Marbury v. Madison
 
Evolution of judicial review in united states of america
Evolution of judicial review in united states of americaEvolution of judicial review in united states of america
Evolution of judicial review in united states of america
 
The Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United StatesThe Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States
 
The Executive Branch
The Executive BranchThe Executive Branch
The Executive Branch
 
Checks and Balances
Checks and BalancesChecks and Balances
Checks and Balances
 
The civil-rights-movement
The civil-rights-movementThe civil-rights-movement
The civil-rights-movement
 
Second Amendment
Second AmendmentSecond Amendment
Second Amendment
 
Korematsu vs. United States
Korematsu vs. United StatesKorematsu vs. United States
Korematsu vs. United States
 
Summary of-the-us-constitution
Summary of-the-us-constitutionSummary of-the-us-constitution
Summary of-the-us-constitution
 
Civil Rights
Civil RightsCivil Rights
Civil Rights
 
elections in usa
elections in usaelections in usa
elections in usa
 
civil liberties & civil rights
civil liberties & civil rights civil liberties & civil rights
civil liberties & civil rights
 
Political Parties
Political PartiesPolitical Parties
Political Parties
 
American federalism
American federalismAmerican federalism
American federalism
 
6 us political system
6 us political system6 us political system
6 us political system
 

Destacado

Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesCory Plough
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesPiers Midwinter
 
Landmark Cases
Landmark CasesLandmark Cases
Landmark CasesKatieUmana
 
36 supreme court-cases
36 supreme court-cases36 supreme court-cases
36 supreme court-casesnorth819
 
The New Frontier
The New FrontierThe New Frontier
The New FrontierRCSDIT
 
Landmark court cases
Landmark court casesLandmark court cases
Landmark court casesmarie_fane
 
E p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
E p royappa v state of TamilnaduE p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
E p royappa v state of TamilnaduAbhinandan Ray
 
Chapter 9.access to judicial review
Chapter 9.access to judicial reviewChapter 9.access to judicial review
Chapter 9.access to judicial reviewAPSU
 
Constitution Scavenger Hunt
Constitution Scavenger HuntConstitution Scavenger Hunt
Constitution Scavenger HuntLina Nandy
 
Customs and Cross-border measures
Customs and Cross-border measuresCustoms and Cross-border measures
Customs and Cross-border measurespatent_unitedipr
 
Famous Supreme Court Cases
Famous Supreme Court CasesFamous Supreme Court Cases
Famous Supreme Court CasesCory Plough
 
10 Landmark Supreme Court Cases (shared using http://VisualBee.com).
10 Landmark Supreme Court Cases (shared using http://VisualBee.com).10 Landmark Supreme Court Cases (shared using http://VisualBee.com).
10 Landmark Supreme Court Cases (shared using http://VisualBee.com).VisualBee.com
 
2012 supreme court case project
2012 supreme court case project2012 supreme court case project
2012 supreme court case projectferrer01
 
NNI Executive Education for Tribal Leaders “The Legal Framework for Native N...
NNI Executive Education for Tribal Leaders “The Legal Framework for Native N...NNI Executive Education for Tribal Leaders “The Legal Framework for Native N...
NNI Executive Education for Tribal Leaders “The Legal Framework for Native N...Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy Program
 
Chapter 12 section 3 and 4 transportaion
Chapter 12 section 3 and 4 transportaionChapter 12 section 3 and 4 transportaion
Chapter 12 section 3 and 4 transportaionRMT Middle School
 

Destacado (20)

Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
 
Landmark Cases
Landmark CasesLandmark Cases
Landmark Cases
 
36 supreme court-cases
36 supreme court-cases36 supreme court-cases
36 supreme court-cases
 
The New Frontier
The New FrontierThe New Frontier
The New Frontier
 
Three landmark court cases answers
Three landmark court cases answersThree landmark court cases answers
Three landmark court cases answers
 
Landmark court cases
Landmark court casesLandmark court cases
Landmark court cases
 
E p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
E p royappa v state of TamilnaduE p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
E p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
 
Chapter 9.access to judicial review
Chapter 9.access to judicial reviewChapter 9.access to judicial review
Chapter 9.access to judicial review
 
Judicial Branch
Judicial BranchJudicial Branch
Judicial Branch
 
Constitution Scavenger Hunt
Constitution Scavenger HuntConstitution Scavenger Hunt
Constitution Scavenger Hunt
 
The Judicial Branch | The US Supreme Court
The Judicial Branch | The US Supreme CourtThe Judicial Branch | The US Supreme Court
The Judicial Branch | The US Supreme Court
 
Unit 7 general
Unit 7 generalUnit 7 general
Unit 7 general
 
Customs and Cross-border measures
Customs and Cross-border measuresCustoms and Cross-border measures
Customs and Cross-border measures
 
Famous Supreme Court Cases
Famous Supreme Court CasesFamous Supreme Court Cases
Famous Supreme Court Cases
 
10 Landmark Supreme Court Cases (shared using http://VisualBee.com).
10 Landmark Supreme Court Cases (shared using http://VisualBee.com).10 Landmark Supreme Court Cases (shared using http://VisualBee.com).
10 Landmark Supreme Court Cases (shared using http://VisualBee.com).
 
2012 supreme court case project
2012 supreme court case project2012 supreme court case project
2012 supreme court case project
 
Chapter 9 The Judiciary
Chapter 9 The JudiciaryChapter 9 The Judiciary
Chapter 9 The Judiciary
 
NNI Executive Education for Tribal Leaders “The Legal Framework for Native N...
NNI Executive Education for Tribal Leaders “The Legal Framework for Native N...NNI Executive Education for Tribal Leaders “The Legal Framework for Native N...
NNI Executive Education for Tribal Leaders “The Legal Framework for Native N...
 
Chapter 12 section 3 and 4 transportaion
Chapter 12 section 3 and 4 transportaionChapter 12 section 3 and 4 transportaion
Chapter 12 section 3 and 4 transportaion
 

Similar a Supreme court Landmark Cases

Federalism timeline
Federalism timelineFederalism timeline
Federalism timelineHaven Jordan
 
11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branchjtoma84
 
106 Law Memorandum
106 Law Memorandum 106 Law Memorandum
106 Law Memorandum Peter Morkos
 
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is UniqueWhy The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is Uniquebbennett
 
Civil Rights In Conflict
Civil Rights In ConflictCivil Rights In Conflict
Civil Rights In ConflictMolly Lynde
 
178144 178144-178144-178144-1-and-14
178144 178144-178144-178144-1-and-14178144 178144-178144-178144-1-and-14
178144 178144-178144-178144-1-and-14wuokanyi
 
22320171The Struggles for Equality Civil Rights.docx
22320171The Struggles for Equality Civil Rights.docx22320171The Struggles for Equality Civil Rights.docx
22320171The Struggles for Equality Civil Rights.docxtamicawaysmith
 
Bill of Rights
Bill of RightsBill of Rights
Bill of Rightsamytouro
 
US v Wong Kim Ark
US v Wong Kim Ark US v Wong Kim Ark
US v Wong Kim Ark Vincent Tsay
 
Civil Rights: Puerto Rico and United States
Civil Rights: Puerto Rico and United StatesCivil Rights: Puerto Rico and United States
Civil Rights: Puerto Rico and United StatesDr. Aitza Haddad Nuñez
 
The constitution rights essay
The constitution   rights essayThe constitution   rights essay
The constitution rights essayaquinaspolitics
 
Business Memo TemplateMEMORANDUMTOFROMDATESUB.docx
Business Memo TemplateMEMORANDUMTOFROMDATESUB.docxBusiness Memo TemplateMEMORANDUMTOFROMDATESUB.docx
Business Memo TemplateMEMORANDUMTOFROMDATESUB.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
 

Similar a Supreme court Landmark Cases (18)

Major court cases
Major court casesMajor court cases
Major court cases
 
Ch05
Ch05Ch05
Ch05
 
Federalism timeline
Federalism timelineFederalism timeline
Federalism timeline
 
No danny
No dannyNo danny
No danny
 
11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch
 
106 Law Memorandum
106 Law Memorandum 106 Law Memorandum
106 Law Memorandum
 
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is UniqueWhy The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
 
Civil Rights In Conflict
Civil Rights In ConflictCivil Rights In Conflict
Civil Rights In Conflict
 
178144 178144-178144-178144-1-and-14
178144 178144-178144-178144-1-and-14178144 178144-178144-178144-1-and-14
178144 178144-178144-178144-1-and-14
 
Civil Rights
Civil RightsCivil Rights
Civil Rights
 
22320171The Struggles for Equality Civil Rights.docx
22320171The Struggles for Equality Civil Rights.docx22320171The Struggles for Equality Civil Rights.docx
22320171The Struggles for Equality Civil Rights.docx
 
Bill of Rights
Bill of RightsBill of Rights
Bill of Rights
 
4.04.pptx
4.04.pptx4.04.pptx
4.04.pptx
 
Ch 5 presentation
Ch 5 presentationCh 5 presentation
Ch 5 presentation
 
US v Wong Kim Ark
US v Wong Kim Ark US v Wong Kim Ark
US v Wong Kim Ark
 
Civil Rights: Puerto Rico and United States
Civil Rights: Puerto Rico and United StatesCivil Rights: Puerto Rico and United States
Civil Rights: Puerto Rico and United States
 
The constitution rights essay
The constitution   rights essayThe constitution   rights essay
The constitution rights essay
 
Business Memo TemplateMEMORANDUMTOFROMDATESUB.docx
Business Memo TemplateMEMORANDUMTOFROMDATESUB.docxBusiness Memo TemplateMEMORANDUMTOFROMDATESUB.docx
Business Memo TemplateMEMORANDUMTOFROMDATESUB.docx
 

Más de RCSDIT

History of Immigration
History of ImmigrationHistory of Immigration
History of ImmigrationRCSDIT
 
The Space Race
The Space RaceThe Space Race
The Space RaceRCSDIT
 
1973 oil crisis
1973 oil crisis1973 oil crisis
1973 oil crisisRCSDIT
 
Wwii homefront
Wwii homefrontWwii homefront
Wwii homefrontRCSDIT
 
New deal
New dealNew deal
New dealRCSDIT
 
Dust bowl
Dust bowlDust bowl
Dust bowlRCSDIT
 
Stock market crash
Stock market crashStock market crash
Stock market crashRCSDIT
 
Civil rights legislation
Civil rights legislationCivil rights legislation
Civil rights legislationRCSDIT
 
Civil rights movement
Civil rights movementCivil rights movement
Civil rights movementRCSDIT
 
Monopolies and trusts
Monopolies and trustsMonopolies and trusts
Monopolies and trustsRCSDIT
 
Social darwinism
Social darwinismSocial darwinism
Social darwinismRCSDIT
 
Big buisness
Big buisnessBig buisness
Big buisnessRCSDIT
 
Urban life
Urban lifeUrban life
Urban lifeRCSDIT
 
Labor unions
Labor unionsLabor unions
Labor unionsRCSDIT
 
Immigrants
ImmigrantsImmigrants
ImmigrantsRCSDIT
 
Wwi presentation
Wwi presentationWwi presentation
Wwi presentationRCSDIT
 
Wilson's 14 points and treaty of versailles
Wilson's 14 points and treaty of versaillesWilson's 14 points and treaty of versailles
Wilson's 14 points and treaty of versaillesRCSDIT
 
Great depression ppt presentation
Great depression ppt presentationGreat depression ppt presentation
Great depression ppt presentationRCSDIT
 
Government ppt
Government pptGovernment ppt
Government pptRCSDIT
 

Más de RCSDIT (20)

History of Immigration
History of ImmigrationHistory of Immigration
History of Immigration
 
The Space Race
The Space RaceThe Space Race
The Space Race
 
1973 oil crisis
1973 oil crisis1973 oil crisis
1973 oil crisis
 
Wwii homefront
Wwii homefrontWwii homefront
Wwii homefront
 
Wwii
WwiiWwii
Wwii
 
New deal
New dealNew deal
New deal
 
Dust bowl
Dust bowlDust bowl
Dust bowl
 
Stock market crash
Stock market crashStock market crash
Stock market crash
 
Civil rights legislation
Civil rights legislationCivil rights legislation
Civil rights legislation
 
Civil rights movement
Civil rights movementCivil rights movement
Civil rights movement
 
Monopolies and trusts
Monopolies and trustsMonopolies and trusts
Monopolies and trusts
 
Social darwinism
Social darwinismSocial darwinism
Social darwinism
 
Big buisness
Big buisnessBig buisness
Big buisness
 
Urban life
Urban lifeUrban life
Urban life
 
Labor unions
Labor unionsLabor unions
Labor unions
 
Immigrants
ImmigrantsImmigrants
Immigrants
 
Wwi presentation
Wwi presentationWwi presentation
Wwi presentation
 
Wilson's 14 points and treaty of versailles
Wilson's 14 points and treaty of versaillesWilson's 14 points and treaty of versailles
Wilson's 14 points and treaty of versailles
 
Great depression ppt presentation
Great depression ppt presentationGreat depression ppt presentation
Great depression ppt presentation
 
Government ppt
Government pptGovernment ppt
Government ppt
 

Último

MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxMENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxPoojaSen20
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting DataJhengPantaleon
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Celine George
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptxPoojaSen20
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsanshu789521
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfUmakantAnnand
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsKarinaGenton
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 

Último (20)

MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxMENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSDStaff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 

Supreme court Landmark Cases

  • 1. R C S D I T Landmark Supreme Court Cases
  • 2. Marbury v Madison 1803 Judicial Review Marbury v. Madison, arguably the most important case in Supreme Court history, was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to apply the principle of "judicial review" -- the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution. Written in 1803 by Chief Justice John Marshall, the decision played a key role in making the Supreme Court a separate branch of government on par with Congress and the executive.
  • 3. McCulloch v Maryland 1819 “Elastic Clause” In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to create the Second Bank of the United States and that the state of Maryland lacked the power to tax the Bank. Arguably Chief Justice John Marshall's finest opinion, McCulloch not only gave Congress broad discretionary power to implement the enumerated powers, but also repudiated, in ringing language, the radical states' rights arguments presented by counsel for Maryland.
  • 4. Gibbons v Ogden 1824 Supremacy of National Laws Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) vastly expanded the powers of Congress through a single clause in the Constitution: the Commerce Clause of Article I, Section 8. The Court ruled that under that clause Congress had powers to regulate any aspect of commerce that crossed state lines, including modes of transportation, and that such regulation preempted conflicting regulation by the states. Since Gibbons, the Commerce Clause has provided the basis for sweeping congressional power over a multitude of national issues.
  • 5. Dred Scott v Sanford 1857 Slaves are property Blacks are not citizens In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.
  • 6. Plessy v Ferguson 1896 Separate but Equal In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms.
  • 7. Schenck v US 1919 Limits Free Speech In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court invented the famous "clear and present danger" test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment. In reviewing the conviction of a man charged with distributing provocative flyers to draftees of World War I, the Court asserted that, in certain contexts, words can create a "clear and present danger" that Congress may constitutionally prohibit. While the ruling has since been overturned, Schenck is still significant for creating the context-based balancing tests used in reviewing freedom of speech challenges.
  • 8. Korematsu v US 1944 Limit Civil Liberties During War Early in World War II, on February 19, 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, granting the U.S. military the power to ban tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese ancestry from areas deemed critical to domestic security. Promptly exercising the power so bestowed, the military then issued an order banning "all persons of Japanese ancestry, both alien and non-alien" from a designated coastal area stretching from Washington State to southern Arizona, and hastily set up internment camps to hold the Japanese Americans for the duration of the war. In defiance of the order, Fred Korematsu, an American-born citizen of Japanese descent, refused to leave his home in San Leandro, California. Duly convicted, he appealed, and in 1944 his case reached the Supreme Court. A 6-3 majority on the Court upheld Korematsu's conviction.
  • 9. Brown v Board of Education 1954 Desegregates schools Overturns Plessy v Ferguson Brown v. Board of Education (1954), now acknowledged as one of the greatest Supreme Court decisions of the 20th century, unanimously held that the racial segregation of children in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Although the decision did not succeed in fully desegregating public education in the United States, it put the Constitution on the side of racial equality and galvanized the nascent civil rights movement into a full revolution.
  • 10. Engel v Vitale 1962 Prayer in School Violates the 1st Amendment This case determined that it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools. The case was brought by the families of public school students in New Hyde Park, New York who complained that the voluntary prayer written by the state board of regents to "Almighty God" contradicted their religious beliefs. They were supported by groups opposed to the school prayer including rabbinical organizations, Ethical Culture, and Judaic organizations.
  • 11. Gideon v Wainwright 1963 Right to Lawyer In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution requires the states to provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses who cannot afford lawyers themselves.
  • 12. Miranda v Arizona 1966 Police must Inform Accused of their Rights In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
  • 13. Roe v Wade 1971 Gave Women the Right to Abortion Roe v. Wade (1973) ruled unconstitutional a state law that banned abortions except to save the life of the mother. The Court ruled that the states were forbidden from outlawing or regulating any aspect of abortion performed during the first trimester of pregnancy, could only enact abortion regulations reasonably related to maternal health in the second and third trimesters, and could enact abortion laws protecting the life of the fetus only in the third trimester. Even then, an exception had to be made to protect the life of the mother.
  • 14. New York Times v US Freedom of the press National security not threatened by Pentagon Papers This ruling made it possible for the New York Times and Washington Post newspapers to publish the then-classified Pentagon Papers without risk of government censorship or punishment. President Richard Nixon had claimed executive authority to force the Times to suspend publication of classified information in its possession. The question before the court was whether the constitutional freedom of the press, guaranteed by the First Amendment, was subordinate to a claimed need of the executive branch of government to maintain the secrecy of information. The Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment did protect the right of the New York Times to print the materials.
  • 15. Regents of U of California v Bakke 1978 Affirmative Action Programs Constitutional In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school's use of "affirmative action" to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.