7. Ref: Book - Target
Volume Delineation
and Field Setup
ANATOMY
8. STAGE GROUPING
T1
< 2cm
T2
2-4 cm
T3
>4cm
T4a
+
Invasion
T4b
++Invasio
n
M1
N0 I II III IV A IV B IV C
N1
<3cm
III III III IV A IV B IV C
SIPSI
N2
3-6cm
BIL
IV A IV A IV A IV A IV B IV C
N3
>6cm IV B IV B IV B IV B IV B IV C
9. CLASSIFICATION – LARYNGEAL
TUMORS
T1
< 2cm
T2
2-4 cm
T3
>4cm
T4a
+
Invasion
T4b
++Invasio
n
M1
N0 EARLY LOCALLY ADVANCED
METASTATIC
N1
<3cm
SIPSI
LOCALLY ADVANCED
N2
3-6cm
BIL
N3
>6cm
Very Locally Advanced
o T4b
o Unresectable N
o Unfit for surgery
10. TREATMENT MODALITIES IN
LARYNX TUMORS 2014
Surgery
Radiotherapy (RT)
Chemotherapy (CT)
} As a single modality
Combined therapy
Palliative therapy
Targeted Therapy
Alone or in
combination with CMT,
RT, CT
1. Induction Chemotherapy(ICT)
2. Concomitant CT and RT
3. Sequential therapy (ICT > CCRT)
4. Adjuvant CT (ART)
5. Postoperative (RT /CCCRT)
11. TREATMENT OPTIONS
T1
< 2cm
T2
2-4 cm
T3
>4cm
T4a
+ Invasion
T4b
++Invasion
M1
N0
I- II
EARLY
RESECTABLE
III -IV B LOCALLY ADVANCED
METASTATIC
CHEMOTHERAPY
III
??RESECTABLE
IV A
??
IV B
IRRESECTABLE
N1
<3cm
SIPSI
III
LOCALLY
ADVANCED
RESECTABLE
III
??RESECTABLE
IV A
??
IV B
IRRESECTABLE
N2
3-6cm
BIL
IV A
LOCALLY ADVANCED
?? RESECTABLE
N3
>6cm
IV B
LOCALLY ADVANCED
?? IRRESECTABLE
12. TREATMENT OPTIONS
T1
< 2cm
T2
2-4 cm
T3
>4cm
T4a
+ Invasion
T4b
++Invasion
M1
N0 EARLY
RESECTABLE
S = RT
LOCALLY ADVANCED
IV C
MET
CT
??RESECTABLE
CRT
??
CRT
IRRESECTABLE
CRT
N1
<3cm
SIPSI
LOCALLY
ADVANCED
RESECTABLE
S > RT / CRT
??RESECTABLE
CRT
??
CRT
IRRESECTABLE
CRT
N2
3-6cm
BIL
LOCALLY ADVANCED
?? RESECTABLE
CRT
N3
>6cm
LOCALLY ADVANCED
?? IRRESECTABLE
CRT
13. T1
< 2cm
T2
2-4 cm
T3
>4cm
T4a
+ Invasion
T4b
++Invasion
M1
N0 LOCALLY ADVANCED
IV C
MET
CT
??RESECTABL
E
S > RT
S > CRT
CRT > S
??
CRT > s
IRRESECTABLE
CRT
N1
<3cm
SIPSI
LOCALLY
ADVANCED
RESECTABLE
S > RT /CRT
N2
3-6cm
BIL
LOCALLY ADVANCED
?? RESECTABLE
CRT > S
N3
>6cm
LOCALLY ADVANCED
?? IRRESECTABLE
CRT
18. Treatment decision making flow
charts
https://tmc.gov.in/clinicalguidelines/EBM/Vol11/TreatmentofAlgorithms.pdf
https://tmc.gov.in/clinicalguidelines/EBM/Vol11/HeadandNeck.pdf
19. Larynx – T1-2 N2-3
Normal Cord mobility
Larynx T1-2,
N2-3
Non Surgical
Options
Normal Cr Cl CRT
Cr Cl – poor
Poor PS
Concurrent
Targeted therapy
with RT
Surgical
Options
Trans oral Laser microsurgery +
BLND+RT /CRT
Open Partial Laryngectomy + BLND +
RT/CRT
Split
therapy
Neck Dissection with Adjuvant
therapy (RT/CRT)
20. Larynx T3 Any N , Operable nodes
Larynx T3 , Any N
(Operable
nodes)
Laryngeal
Function Intact
Normal Cr CL CRT
Poor Cr Cl
Concurrent Targeted
therapy with RT
Altered Fraction RT for
N0-1
Open PL + Ipsi ND (N0)
and BLND (N+) with
Adjvuant RT /CRT
Laryngeal
function
Compromised NTL / TL with BLND
+ Adjuvant RT/CRT
21. Laryngeal
Function
and
Framework
Function Intact
Cartilage - N
Cr Cl
Normal
NTL /TL + BLND
+ RT/CRT
CRT
Cr Cl
Compromised
Concurrent Targeted
Therapy
Altered Fraction RT
NTL/TL with BLND +
RT/CRT
Function
Compromised
Cartilage damaged
NTL/TL with BLND +
RT/CRT
Larynx T4 Any N
22. Very locally-advanced HNC
Include T4b, unresectable N, unfit for surgery
• CRT or ICT RT/CRT
• ± Surgery to T and N if feasable PS 0-1
• RT or CRT
• ± Surgery to T and N if feasable PS 2
• Palliative RT
• Single agent Chemotherapy
• Reassess for Surgery if feasable PS 3
PS 4 • Best Supportive Care
37. Organ Preservation – Larynx cancer
• Compared with RT alone, LFS significantly better
with
– ICT followed by RT
– RT/concurrent cisplatin
• Compared with ICT followed by RT or RT alone
– Laryngeal Preservation and locoregional control
significantly better with RT/concurrent cisplatin
• No significant difference in OS
• CRT now the standard of care in organ preservation
53. Concomitant RT PLUS Cisplatin vs Cetuximab
A meta-analysis
5 Trials – Total of 1808 patients
Conclusions: Platinum-based CTRT still remains the standard of care in LAHNC
until prospective trials can demonstrate equivalence.
J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 6014)
59. Combined EORTC /RTOG Analysis
Overall Survival for Patients WITHOUT Positive Margin
and/or ECE
Bernier, Cooper. Head Neck 2005;27:843
60. Combined EORTC /RTOG Analysis
Overall Survival for Patients WITH Positive Margin and/or ECE
Bernier, Cooper. Head Neck 2005;27:843
5 yr Follow up Data
61. Long term followup of RTOG 9501
Patients with Positive Margin and/or ECE
Cooper et al. IJROBP 2012
10 yr Follow up Data
62. Postoperative RT- Indications
1. Positive resection margins
2. Extracapsular lymph node
spread
Any 2 of the following
3. Close margins < 5 mm.
4. Invasion of soft tissues. (T3/T4)
5. Two or more lymph nodes positive.
6. More than one positive nodal group.
7. Involved node > 3 cm in diameter.
8. Multicentre primary.
9. Perineural invasion.
10. Lymphovascular Invasion
OR
1 or 2 --- Post op ChemoRT Any 2 of 3-10 ---- Post op RT only
63. Other factors to be considered
11. Poor differentiation
12. Stage T3/4
13. Oral cancer with Level 4/5 positive node
14. CIS, dysplasia at edge of resection margin
15. Uncertainties concerning surgical/pathological
findings
16. HPV negativity
65. Target Volume Delineation (1)
• If neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been given
prior to radiation, the targets should be
outlined on the planning CT according to
their prechemotherapy extent.
• Review the operation notes and discuss with
surgeon to know more about areas of
concern.
• Review the detailed HPE report and if
necessary discuss with the pathologist
66. Target Volume Delineation (2)
• May deliver RT as soon as the wound is
healed
• Ideally initiate after 2 weeks but within 6
weeks after surgery
• Registration of Pre-Op images to sim CT
• Use proper immobilisation device and to do
Planning CT with Contrast and atleast 3 mm
slice thickness
• PET – CT for fusion where ever possible
67. Post operative RT Dose
Negative Margins • 60 Gy in 30 fractions
• 66 Gy in 33 fractions
Microscopically positive
margins
Gross Residual Disease • 70 Gy in 35 fractions
• Stoma Boost – With Electrons 10 Gy in 5
fractions (Level II Evidence)
Subglottic Extension
Chemotherapy • If positive Margin or ECE present.
Text book: Practical Essentials of IMRT –Chao, 3rd Edition
68. Nodal Volume Delineation - Larynx
Submandibular nodes • N2c Cases when Level 2 is involved
• Ipsilateral Neck in all cases
Upper Deep jugular nodes
(Junctional / Parapharyngeal)
• Bilaterally all cases (Level 2-4) Jugulodigastric, mid jugular,
SCLN
• All cases - Ipsilateral if jugular nodes are involved Posterior Cervical nodes (Level
5)
Retropharyngeal nodes • If evidence of metastases is present
Text book: Practical Essentials of IMRT –Chao, 3rd Edition
69. Postoperative IMRT
• Residual Tumor and adjacent region
• Surgical bed with soft tissue invasion
• Extracapsular extension of nodes
CTV1
CTV2 • Prophylactically the treated neck
Text book: Practical Essentials of IMRT –Chao, 3rd Edition
70. Post op IMRT
T2 N2b Mo
CA Supraglottis
Clinically Level 2 node +
TL + BLND
HPE- Sq cell carcinoma
4 nodes positive
No ECE
CTV 1 – Surgical Bed
CTV 2 – Prophylactic neck
72. Definitive IMRT
• Gross Tumor (Primary and Nodes)
and the region adjacent to it CTV1
• High risk regions in the Ipsilateral
CTV2 neck
CTV 3 • Prophylactically treated neck
Text book: Practical Essentials of IMRT –Chao, 3rd Edition
73. Radical IMRT
T3 N2b Mo , Ca Supraglottis
Presentation - Hoarseness and
sore throat.
DL Scopy – A Tumor in the left
false vocal cord and AEF.
Multiple left-sided lymph nodes
GTV p
GTV n
CTV 1 GTVp+n + 5mm
CTV 2 IN(Adjacent LN)
CTV 3 IN + CN + RPLN
74. Radical IMRT
T3 N2b Mo , Ca Supraglottis
Presentation - Hoarseness
and sore throat.
DL Scopy – A Tumor in the
left false vocal cord and AEF.
Multiple left-sided lymph
nodes
GTV p
GTV n
CTV 1 GTVp+n + 5mm
CTV 2 IN(Adjacent LN)
CTV 3 IN + CN + RPLN
75. CTV Guidelines – Definitive IMRT Larynx
Tumor Site Stage CTV 1 CTV 2 CTV3
Glottis
T1-2 N0 GTVp +5mm ----- -----
T3-4 N0 GTVp+5mm
Whole laryngeal
apparatus
IN + CN (II-V)
Any T , N+
GTVp+n
+ 5mm
IN(Adjacent LN) +
Whole Laryngeal
Apparatus
IN + CN + RPLN*
Supraglottis
Any T , N0 GTVp+5mm
Whole laryngeal
apparatus
IN + CN (II-V)
Any T , N+
GTVp+n
+5mm
IN(Adjacent LN)
+Whole laryngeal
apparatus
IN + CN + RPLN*
Adjacent LN – with in 3 cm of CTV 1
RPLN * --- Include when midline tumors/ advanced tumors
Text book: Practical Essentials of IMRT –Chao, 3rd Edition
76. Dose Prescription – Definitive IMRT Larynx
Dose for
ChemoRT
CTV 1 CTV 2 CTV3
33 fractions 70 Gy in 33 # 59.4 Gy in 33 # 54 Gy in 33 #
35 fractions 70 Gy in 35 # 63 Gy in 35 # 56 Gy in 35 #
Text book: Practical Essentials of IMRT –Chao, 3rd Edition
77. Post Organ Preservation Treatment Evaluation
• DL Scopy / NPL scopy and CT scan 6 weeks after
treatment
• PETCT scan if ordered to be done only after 12
weeks
• Thyroid Function tests after 6 months or
symptomatic whichever is earlier
• Swallowing Therapy To initiate in pre treatment
setting and continue during and after radiation
78. Treatments following CRT in LA Larynx Tumors
CR (T + N)
Follow up
Residual
(PR /SD)
Resectable
• R0 in T and N – Follow up
• R1 /R2 – Chemotherapy
Unresectable
• Treat as PD
• Chemotherapy
Metastases
Progression
Palliative
Chemotherapy
79. Time Line for Salvage Surgery after CRT
ee
Salvage surgery within 4-6 months after CRT
80. Treatments after ICT Induction therapy
• Radical RT only
CR – Both T and
N
• RT and then assess for node
• If residual post RT – Neck dissection CR – T only
• RT /CCRT and follow up
• If Residual post RT – Salvage Surgery PR – T only
SD or PD at T • Surgery Post op RT /CRT
81. Conclusion
• Chemo radiotherapy (concomitant or sequential) is
better than RT alone in irresectable HN cancer and
resectable glottic or supraglottic malignancies
• CCRT is better than SCRT in laryngeal preservation
• SCRT is not significantly inferior to CCRT in
irresectable tumors
83. Increase the Likelihood of Successful Larynx
Preservation (cont’d)
• Factors Associated with Decreased Larynx-Preservation Outcomes:
– Male / Smoker
– Anemia (at start of treatment)
– Advanced T stage
– Clinically detectable impaired vocal cord mobility
– Subglottic extension
– Involvement of anterior commissure
– Large tumor volume
– Invasion of specific anatomic sites (determined by CT or MRI)