SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 69
Biological effects of radiation
INTRODUCTION
• Radiation is all around us. It is naturally
  present in our environment & comes from
  outer space (cosmic), the ground (terrestrial),
  and even from within our own bodies.
• Certain foods such as bananas and brazil nuts
  naturally contain higher levels of radiation
  than other foods.
• Levels of natural or background radiation can
  vary greatly from one location to the next.
Typical Effective Radiation Dose from Diagnostic X Ray—Single Exposure
Typical Effective Radiation Dose from Nuclear Medicine Examination
• Radiation is of 2 types:
  – Ionizing (α, β, γ & x-rays)
  – Nonionizing (visible light, infrared, radiowaves)
• Ionizing radiation is subdivided into:
  – electromagnetic radiation (X-rays and γ rays)
  – particulate radiation (neutrons, alpha and beta
    particles).
Radiation Biology History
• 1895-Roentgen announces discovery of X-rays
• 1896-(4 months later) Reports of skin effects
  in x-ray researchers
• 1902-First cases of radiation induced skin
  cancer reported
• 1906-Pattern for differential radiosensitivity of
  tissues was discovered.
• Biological effects of ionizing radiation depend
  on several factors that make them variable
  and inconsistent.
• The effects are classified based on their nature
  and timing after exposure into
  – early or delayed,
  – somatic or hereditary,
  – stochastic or deterministic
Prompt Effects
  • High doses delivered to the whole body of healthy adults within short
    periods of time can produce effects such as blood component changes,
    fatigue, diarrhea, nausea and death. These effects will develop within
    hours, days or weeks, depending on the size of the dose. The larger the
    dose, the sooner a given effect will occur.

Effect                                               Dose

Blood count changes                                  50 rem

Vomiting (threshold)                                 100 rem

Mortality (threshold)                                150 rem

LD50/60* (with minimal supportive care)              320 – 360 rem

LD50/60 (with supportive medical treatment)          480 – 540 rem

100% mortality (with best available treatment)       800 rem
Delayed effects:
• effects such as cataract formation and cancer
  induction that may appear months or years
  after a radiation exposure
 *average lifetime risk of death from cancer following
  an acute dose equivalent to all body organs of 0.1 Sv
  (10 rem) is estimated to be 0.8%. baseline risk of
  cancer induction in the United States is
  approximately 25%.
Another way of stating this risk is by considering
the Relative Risk of a 1 in a million chance of
death from some common activities:

·   Smoking 1.4 cigarettes in a lifetime (lung cancer)
·   Eating 40 tablespoons of peanut butter (aflatoxin)
·   Spending two days in New York City (air pollution)
·   Driving 40 miles in a car (accident)
·   Flying 2500 miles in a jet (accident)
·   Canoeing for 6 minutes (drowning)
·   Receiving a dose of 10 mrem of radiation (cancer)
• Stochastic effects refer to random and
  unpredictable effects usually following chronic
  exposure to low dose radiation. E.g.
  Hereditary effects and carcinogenesis
Schematic development of the events leading to stochastic radiation effects
• Deterministic (non-stochastic) effects are non-
  random and have a highly predictable
  response to radiation. There is a threshold of
  radiation dose after which the response is
  dose-related. E.g. radiation-induced lung
  fibrosis and cataract
MECHANISMS OF RADIATION
EFFECTS
Ionizing radiation exerts its effects on biological targets through two
major mechanism:
Direct effect
• ionizing radiation acts by direct hits on target
  atoms.
• All atoms or molecules within the cells, such
  as enzymatic and structural proteins and RNA,
  are vulnerable to radiation injury but DNA is
  the principal target, in which ionizing radiation
  produces single or double-stranded
  chromosomal breaks.
• It is estimated that about one third of
  biological damage by γ radiation is caused by
  direct effects.
• This process becomes more dominant with
  high LET radiation, such as neutrons or α
  particles
Indirect Effect
• two-thirds of biological damage caused by low
  linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is due to
  indirect action
• Water Radiolysis
   absorption of energy depends on the abundance
  of material in the path of the radiation. Water is
  the most predominant molecule in living
  organisms, therefore, a major proportion of
  radiation energy deposited will be absorbed in
  cellular water.
   A complex series of chemical changes occurs in
  water after exposure to ionizing radiation. This
  process is called water radiolysis
• These primary water radicals have high reactivity
  towards molecules of cells, DNA, lipids and other
  subcellular constituents. In oxygenated solutions,
  hydrogen atoms can react with oxygen to give
  hydroperoxyl free radicals(HO2•)
• The relative yields of the water radiolysis products
  depend on the pH and LET of the radiation.
• The concentration of these radicals are expressed in
  terms of a G value which is defined as the number of
  radicals or molecules produced per 100 eV of energy
  absorbed in the medium
FACTORS AFFECTING RADIATION
HAZARD
Factors Related to Ionizing Radiation
• Type of Radiation:
  – Various types of radiation differ in penetrability
    based on LET.
  – This value is high for alpha particles, lower for
    beta particles, and even less for gamma rays and
    X-rays. Thus alpha particles penetrate a short
    distance but induce heavy damage,
• Mode of Administration:
  – a single dose of radiation causes more damage
    than the same dose being divided (fractionated)
• Dose Rate:
  – The longer the duration for the same total dose,
    the better the chance of cellular repair and the
    smaller the damage
Factors Related to Biological Target
• Radiosensitivity:
  – Radiosensitivity varies with the rate of mitosis and
    cellular maturity. Blood-forming cells are very
    sensitive to radiation, while neurons, muscle and
    parathyroid cells are highly radioresistant. With in a
    given cell, the nucleus in general is relatively more
    radiosensitive than the cytoplasm.
  – When cells in G0/G1phase of the cell cycle are
    exposed to radiation they tend to halt their
    progression into G2/M phase. G2 synchronization
    produces a cluster of radiosensitive cells. A second hit
    within a time frame of 5–12 h leads to a higher
    proportion of deleterious effects.
• Repair Capacity of Cells:

• Cell-Cycle Phase:
   – All phases of the cell cycle can be affected by ionizing radiation.
     Overall, sensitivity appears to be greatest in G2 phase.
   – Recovery from sublethal damage occurs in all phases of the cell
     cycle. However, this is most pronounced in the S phase, which is
     also the most radio-resistant phase



• Degree of Tissue Oxygenation:
   – Molecular oxygen is known to have the ability to potentiate the
     response to radiation
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR
RADIOBIOLOGY
Radiation lesions in DNA
• Radiation causes a wide range of lesions in
  DNA such as
  – single strand breaks in the phosphodiester linkage,
  – double strand breaks on opposing sites or
  – base damage,
  – protein-DNA crosslinks and protein-protein
    crosslinks involving nuclear proteins such as
    histones and non-histone proteins.
• The number of DNA lesions generated by
  irradiation is large, but the number giving rise
  to cell kill is extremely small. The numbers of
  lesions induced in the DNA of a cell by a dose
  of1-2 Gy are approximately:
   – base damages > 1000;
   – single strand breaks (ssb) ~1000;
   – double strand breaks (dsb) ~40.
• Dsb play a critical role in cell killing
Fate of Irradiated Cells
•   No effect.
•   Division Delay
•   Apoptosis: cell death before it can divide.
•   Reproductive Failure: cell death when attempting
    MITOSIS.
•   Genomic Instability: delayed reproductive failure.
•   Mutation: cells contains mutation in genome.
•   Transformation: mutation leads to carcinogenesis.
•   Bystander Effects: damaged cell induces damage in
    surrounding ones.
•   Adaptative Response: increased resistance to radiation.
• Genomic Instability:
  – Maximal radiation-induced genetic damage is
    formed shortly (minutes to hours) after radiation
    exposure. Nevertheless, it has been observed that
    not only the irradiated cells but also descendents
    may show delayed effects.
  – Cells that sustain non-lethal DNA damage show
    increased mutation rate in descendent cells
    several generations after the initial exposure
• Bystander Effect.
  – The cells in the vicinity of irradiated cells show
    effects that cannot be attributed to targeting by
    ionizing radiation tracks. The mechanism is not
    clearly understood; however, gap junctional
    intercellular communication or release of soluble
    factors (such as cytokines) from irradiated cells
    has been proposed. Through cell-to-cell
    interaction, the directly irradiated cells
    communicate with adjacent cells and spread the
    effect of radiation to a larger number of cells.
Acute effects of radiation
• Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) is an acute
  illness caused by irradiation of the entire body
  (or most of the body) by a high dose of
  penetrating radiation in a very short period of
  time (usually a matter of minutes)
• conditions for Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) are:
• The radiation dose must be large (i.e., greater than 0.7 Gray (Gy)).
    – Mild symptoms may be observed with doses as low as 0.3 Gy or 30 rads.
• The dose usually must be external ( i.e., the source of radiation is
  outside of the patient’s body).
    – Radioactive materials deposited inside the body have produced some ARS
      effects only in extremely rare cases.
• The radiation must be penetrating (i.e., able to reach the internal
  organs).
    – High energy X-rays, gamma rays, and neutrons are penetrating radiations.
• The entire body (or a significant portion of it) must have received the
  dose.
    – Most radiation injuries are local, frequently involving the hands, and these
      local injuries seldom cause classical signs of ARS.
• The dose must have been delivered in a short time (usually a matter
  of minutes).
    – Fractionated doses are often used in radiation therapy. These are large
      total doses delivered in small daily amounts over a period of time.
      Fractionated doses are less effective at inducing ARS than a single dose of
      the same magnitude.
stages of ARS
• Prodromal stage (N-V-D stage): The classic symptoms for
  this stage are nausea, vomiting, as well as anorexia and
  possibly diarrhea (depending on dose), which occur from
  minutes to days following exposure. The symptoms may
  last (episodically) for minutes up to several days.
• Latent stage: In this stage, the patient looks and feels
  generally healthy for a few hours or even up to a few
  weeks.
• Manifest illness stage: In this stage the symptoms depend
  on the specific syndrome and last from hours up to several
  months.
• Recovery or death: Most patients who do not recover will
  die within several months of exposure. The recovery
  process lasts from several weeks up to two years
three classic ARS Syndromes
• Bone marrow syndrome (aka: hematopoietic syndrome) occur with a dose
  between 0.7 and 10 Gy (70 – 1000 rads) though mild symptoms may occur
  as low as 0.3 Gy or 30 rads.
    – The survival rate of patients with this syndrome decreases with increasing
      dose. The primary cause of death is the destruction of the bone marrow,
      resulting in infection and hemorrhage.
• Gastrointestinal (GI) syndrome: occur with a dose greater than
  approximately 10 Gy (1000 rads) although some symptoms may occur as
  low as 6 Gy or 600 rads.
    – Survival is extremely unlikely with this syndrome. Destructive and irreparable
      changes in the GI tract and bone marrow usually cause infection, dehydration,
      and electrolyte imbalance. Death usually occurs within 2 weeks.
• Cardiovascular (CV)/ Central Nervous System (CNS) syndrome: occur with
  a dose greater than approximately 50 Gy (5000 rads) although some
  symptoms may occur as low as 20 Gy or 2000 rads.
    – Death occurs within 3 days. Death likely is due to collapse of the circulatory
      system as well as increased pressure in the confining cranial vault as the result
      of increased fluid content caused by edema, vasculitis, and meningitis
Cutaneus radiation syndrome
• It is possible to receive a damaging dose to the skin without
  symptoms of ARS, especially with acute exposures to beta radiation
  or X-rays. Sometimes this occurs when radioactive materials
  contaminate a patient’s skin or clothes.
• When the basal cell layer of the skin is damaged by radiation, within
  a few hours after irradiation, a transient and inconsistent erythema
  (associated with itching) can occur. Then, a latent phase may occur
  and last from a few days up to several weeks, when intense
  reddening, blistering, and ulceration of the irradiated site are
  visible.
• In most cases, healing occurs by regenerative means; however, very
  large skin doses can cause permanent hair loss, damaged
  sebaceous and sweat glands, atrophy, fibrosis, decreased or
  increased skin pigmentation, and ulceration or necrosis of the
  exposed tissue.
Initial Treatment and Diagnostic
               Evaluation
• Treat vomiting, and repeat CBC analysis, with
  special attention to the lymphocyte count,
  every 2 to 3 hours for the first 8 to 12 hours
  following exposure (and every 4 to 6 hours for
  the following 2 or 3 days).
• Sequential changes in absolute lymphocyte
  counts over time are demonstrated in the
  Andrews Lymphocyte Nomogram
From Andrews GA, Auxier JA, Lushbaugh CC. The Importance of Dosimetry to the Medical
Management of Persons Exposed to High Levels of Radiation.
In Personal Dosimetry for Radiation Accidents. Vienna :
International Atomic Energy Agency; 1965
• Patients with a minimal lymphocyte count (MLC) of 1000-
  1499/mm3 have an approximate absorbed dose of 0.5-1.9
  Gy. prognosis is good because the absorbed dose is usually
  nonlethal.
• Patients with MLC of 500-999/mm3 have an approximate
  absorbed dose of 2.0-3.9 Gy. fair prognosis.
• MLC of 100-499/mm3 coincides with an approximate
  absorbed dose of 4.0-7.9 Gy. poor prognosis,
• MLC less than 100/mm3 have an estimated absorbed dose
  of greater than 8 Gy. high incidence of death despite bone
  marrow stimulation.
• Survival has not been documented for those exposed to
  greater than 10 Gy.
• Time to emesis:
  – Time to emesis (TE) correlates with exposure
    dose, decreasing as exposure dose increases.
  – For TE less than 1 hour, whole-body dose
    estimates are greater than 4 Gy.
  – For TE between 1 and 2 hours, whole-body dose is
    estimated to be greater than 3 Gy.
  – for TE greater than 4 hours, whole-body dose is
    estimated to be around 1 Gy.
Pharmacologic Therapy for Radiation
               Injury
• Enteral binding agents
  – Barium sulfate: Adult dose: 200 mL PO x 1 dose
    Binds with strontium and radium
  – Aluminum and magnesium salts: Adult dose: 100
    mL PO x 1 dose. Binds with strontium, radium, and
    phosphorous
  – Activated charcoal
• Blockade of end-organ uptake
   – Potassium iodide: Adult dose: 130 mg PO daily (maximum: 1
     dose in 24h)
      Duration of therapy: Continue daily dose until exposure risk has
     passed and/or until other measures (eg, evacuation, sheltering,
     control of the food and milk supply) have been successfully
     implemented
     Blocks thyroid uptake of iodine and technetium
   – Calcium gluconate: Adult dose: 3 g IV x 1 dose
     Blockade into bone by increasing urinary excretion of
     radioactive strontium and calcium
   – Calcium chloride: Adult dose: 1 g IV x 1 dose
     Blockade into bone by increasing urinary excretion of radioactive
     strontium and calcium
• Dilution
  – Oral fluids: Adult dose: 5-10 L PO/IV daily x 1wk
    Excretion of tritium
  – Neutra Phos: Adult dose: 1 packet (diluted) PO
    QID x 3d. Excretion of phosphorus
  – K Phos: Adult dose: 2 tablets PO QID x 3d.
    Excretion of phosphorus
• Chelation
  – Pentetate trisodium salts(DTPA; Ca-DTPA within
    24h, Zn-DTPA after 24h): Adult dose: 1 g IV in 250
    mL saline/D5W daily. Chelates americium,
    uranium, plutonium, heavy metals
  – Penicillamine: Adult dose: 250-500 mg PO QID.
    Chelates cobalt
  – Prussian blue: Adult dose: 3 g PO TID; minimum
    30-day treatment. Chelates cesium and thallium
• Decrease organ damage
  – Sodium bicarbonate: Adult dose: 2 mEq/kg IV x 1
    dose. Nephroprotective for uranium
RADIATION AND PREGNANCY
Acute Radiation                                                          Time Post Conception
Dose* to the                    Blastogenesis          Organogenesis                                 Fetogenesis
                                (up to 2 wks)            (2 –7 wks)                (8–15 wks)                 (16 –25 wks)           (26 –38 wks)
Embryo/Fetus
< 0.05 Gy (5 rads)†                                             Noncancer health effects NOT detectable
0.05–0.50 Gy (5–50 rads) Incidence of failure to      • Incidence of • Growth retardation possible
                         implant may increase         major
                         slightly, but surviving      malformations • Reduction in IQ possible (up to
                         embryos will probably        may increase    15 points, depending on dose)
                         have no significant          slightly                                                       Noncancer health
                         (noncancer) health effects                   • Incidence of severe mental                    effects unlikely
                                                      • Growth        retardation up to 20%, depending
                                                      retardation     on dose
                                                      possible
> 0.50 Gy (50 rads)      Incidence of failure to      • Incidence of • Incidence of miscarriage             • Incidence of         Incidence of
                         implant will likely be       miscarriage may probably will increase, depending     miscarriage may        miscarriage
The expectant mother     large,‡depending on dose,    increase,       on dose                               increase, depending on and
may be experiencing      but surviving embryos will   depending on                                          dose                   neonatal
acute radiation syndrome probably have no             dose            • Growth retardation likely                                  death will
in this range, depending significant (noncancer)                                                            • Growth retardation probably
on her whole-body dose. health effects                • Substantial risk • Reduction in IQ possible (> 15   possible, depending on increase
                                                      of major           points, depending on dose)         dose                   depending o
                                                      malformations
                                                      such as            • Incidence of severe mental       • Reduction in IQ
                                                      neurological and retardation > 20%, depending on      possible, depending on
                                                      motor              dose                               dose
                                                      deficiencies
                                                                         • Incidence of major               • Severe mental
                                                      • Growth           malformations will probably        retardation possible,
                                                      retardation likely increase                           depending on dose

                                                                                                            • Incidence of major
                                                                                                            malformations may
                                                                                                            increase
Estimated Risk for Cancer from Prenatal Radiation Exposure

     Radiation Dose           Estimated Childhood Estimated Lifetime‡ Cancer Incidence§
                              Cancer Incidence* † (exposure at age 10)
No radiation exposure       0.3%                  38%
above background

0.00–0.05 Gy (0–5 rads) 0.3%–1%                         38%–40%
0.05–0.50 Gy (5–50      1%–6%                           40%–55%
rads)
> 0.50 Gy (50 rads)     > 6%                            > 55%

* Data published by the International Commission on Radiation Protection.

† Childhood cancer mortality is roughly half of childhood cancer incidence.

‡ The lifetime cancer risks from prenatal radiation exposure are not yet known. The lifetime risk
estimates given are for Japanese males exposed at age 10 years from models published by the United
Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation.
§ Lifetime cancer mortality is roughly one third of lifetime cancer incidence.
RADIATION HORMESIS:
introduction
• There are threevmodels predicting
  relationships between the radiation dose and
  the effect of such an expo-sure to a biological
  target.
• The differences between these models arise
  from different underlying assumptions
• Linear-No Threshold Model:               It assumes that any
 level of radiation is harmful and that the risk increases linearly
 with increments of dose. It is applied for radiation protection
 purposes and is meant to limit the risk to workers in radiation
 fields.
• ThresholdModel:            It assumes that the risk of radiation
 is linearly related to the dose; however, this occurs only after
 a certain threshold level is exceeded. Below the threshold
 level no risk is to be expected. The theory behind the
 threshold level is that some degree of cellular damage should
 accumulate and produce cell damage.
• Hormesis Model: In this model there is a bimodal effect
  of radiation, where below a certain threshold level radiation is
  protective, and harmful effects are seen only when this
  threshold is exceeded. The rationale is that radiation at low
  levels induces protective cellular mechanisms which prevent
  DNA damage occurring spontaneously or due to other
  stresses
definition
• Hormesis is a concept that describes the
  nature of dose-response relationships in
  biological systems as displaying a stimulatory
  response at low doses and an inhibitory
  response at higher doses.
• The probability of radiation induced adaptive
  protection measurably outweighs that of
  damage from doses well below 200 mGy low-
  LET radiation.
Note that mechanisms of DNA damage prevention and repair and the immune stimulation
decrease after a maximum at doses between 0.1 Gy and 0.2 Gy, in contrast to apoptosis
incidence that increases with dose
Single low-dose induced adaptive responses have dif-ferent times of duration depending on
protective mechanisms that begin with a delay of several hours and may last for days
to weeks – and even up to months for immune response. Note that repair in response to
 radiation damage begins immediately after damage has occurred.
Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Injuries from radiations
Injuries from radiationsInjuries from radiations
Injuries from radiationsUmar Tauqir
 
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATIONBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATIONGanesan Yogananthem
 
Tissue radiosensitivity
Tissue radiosensitivityTissue radiosensitivity
Tissue radiosensitivityDeepaGautam
 
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationLecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationAlbania Energy Association
 
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and RadioprotectorsLET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and RadioprotectorsDrAyush Garg
 
Biological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiationsBiological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiationsMirza Anwar Baig
 
Biological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiationsBiological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiationsMirza Anwar Baig
 
Radiation effect on cell
Radiation effect on cellRadiation effect on cell
Radiation effect on cellDeepaGautam
 
Ionizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protectionIonizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protectionAhmed Bahnassy
 
Biological effects of ionizing radiations
Biological effects of ionizing radiationsBiological effects of ionizing radiations
Biological effects of ionizing radiationsEneutron
 
Ppt. on Radiation Hazards by Dr. Brajesh K. Ben
Ppt. on Radiation Hazards by Dr. Brajesh K. BenPpt. on Radiation Hazards by Dr. Brajesh K. Ben
Ppt. on Radiation Hazards by Dr. Brajesh K. Bendr brajesh Ben
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationpavithra vinayak
 
4 r’s of radiobiology
4 r’s of radiobiology4 r’s of radiobiology
4 r’s of radiobiologysaikishore15
 
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effectFractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effectParag Roy
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Injuries from radiations
Injuries from radiationsInjuries from radiations
Injuries from radiations
 
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATIONBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION
 
Tissue radiosensitivity
Tissue radiosensitivityTissue radiosensitivity
Tissue radiosensitivity
 
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationLecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
 
Acute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndromeAcute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndrome
 
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and RadioprotectorsLET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
 
Biological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiationsBiological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiations
 
Biological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiationsBiological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiations
 
Radiation effect on cell
Radiation effect on cellRadiation effect on cell
Radiation effect on cell
 
Ionizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protectionIonizing radiation protection
Ionizing radiation protection
 
RBE
RBERBE
RBE
 
Biological effects of ionizing radiations
Biological effects of ionizing radiationsBiological effects of ionizing radiations
Biological effects of ionizing radiations
 
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandanaLET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
LET, RBE & OER - dr vandana
 
Radiobiology
RadiobiologyRadiobiology
Radiobiology
 
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPYBASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
 
Ppt. on Radiation Hazards by Dr. Brajesh K. Ben
Ppt. on Radiation Hazards by Dr. Brajesh K. BenPpt. on Radiation Hazards by Dr. Brajesh K. Ben
Ppt. on Radiation Hazards by Dr. Brajesh K. Ben
 
Radiation biology
Radiation biologyRadiation biology
Radiation biology
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiation
 
4 r’s of radiobiology
4 r’s of radiobiology4 r’s of radiobiology
4 r’s of radiobiology
 
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effectFractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effect
 

Destacado

Bilogical effects of mobile radiations
Bilogical effects of mobile radiationsBilogical effects of mobile radiations
Bilogical effects of mobile radiationsMadhuri Shingala
 
Personality development
Personality developmentPersonality development
Personality developmentNursing Path
 
Stress & stress management
Stress & stress managementStress & stress management
Stress & stress managementrehan012
 
Personality Development
Personality DevelopmentPersonality Development
Personality DevelopmentAshwin
 
Stress Management Presentation
Stress Management PresentationStress Management Presentation
Stress Management PresentationPk Doctors
 

Destacado (7)

Bilogical effects of mobile radiations
Bilogical effects of mobile radiationsBilogical effects of mobile radiations
Bilogical effects of mobile radiations
 
Personality development
Personality developmentPersonality development
Personality development
 
Stress & stress management
Stress & stress managementStress & stress management
Stress & stress management
 
Personality Development
Personality DevelopmentPersonality Development
Personality Development
 
Nip presentation
Nip presentationNip presentation
Nip presentation
 
Stress Management Presentation
Stress Management PresentationStress Management Presentation
Stress Management Presentation
 
Personality ppt
Personality pptPersonality ppt
Personality ppt
 

Similar a Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN

seminar.pptx
seminar.pptxseminar.pptx
seminar.pptxAbinVl1
 
Radiation biology
Radiation biologyRadiation biology
Radiation biologyDr Kumar
 
Ionizing Radiation & Health
Ionizing Radiation & HealthIonizing Radiation & Health
Ionizing Radiation & HealthAlok Kumar
 
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptxBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptxSubamProjects
 
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.pptZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppticchapipesh
 
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION (2).pdf
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION  (2).pdfBIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION  (2).pdf
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION (2).pdfiloveimo025
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationNuthan DeSouza
 
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATIONBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATIONMdshams244
 
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safetyBiological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safetyLama K Banna
 
Biological effects of radiation.ppt
Biological effects of radiation.pptBiological effects of radiation.ppt
Biological effects of radiation.pptNuhuUsman1
 
Radiation diseases
Radiation diseasesRadiation diseases
Radiation diseasesKamal Deen
 
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.pptZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppticchapipesh
 
zom703biologicaleffectsofionizingradiation-221228102135-accdae82.pdf
zom703biologicaleffectsofionizingradiation-221228102135-accdae82.pdfzom703biologicaleffectsofionizingradiation-221228102135-accdae82.pdf
zom703biologicaleffectsofionizingradiation-221228102135-accdae82.pdfsudheendrapv
 
BIOLOGICAL%20EFFECTS%20OF%20RADIATION.pptx
BIOLOGICAL%20EFFECTS%20OF%20RADIATION.pptxBIOLOGICAL%20EFFECTS%20OF%20RADIATION.pptx
BIOLOGICAL%20EFFECTS%20OF%20RADIATION.pptxYogita Janghu
 
Radiation Biology
Radiation BiologyRadiation Biology
Radiation BiologyIAU Dent
 
RADIATION hazards n protection
RADIATION hazards n protectionRADIATION hazards n protection
RADIATION hazards n protectionRMLIMS
 
radiation hazards by lalithasravani.
radiation hazards by lalithasravani.radiation hazards by lalithasravani.
radiation hazards by lalithasravani.Lalitha Sravni
 

Similar a Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN (20)

seminar.pptx
seminar.pptxseminar.pptx
seminar.pptx
 
Radiation biology
Radiation biologyRadiation biology
Radiation biology
 
Ionizing Radiation & Health
Ionizing Radiation & HealthIonizing Radiation & Health
Ionizing Radiation & Health
 
Radiobiology
RadiobiologyRadiobiology
Radiobiology
 
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptxBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
 
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.pptZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
 
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION (2).pdf
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION  (2).pdfBIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION  (2).pdf
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION (2).pdf
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiation
 
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATIONBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
 
Radiation biology
Radiation biologyRadiation biology
Radiation biology
 
Radiation ppt
Radiation pptRadiation ppt
Radiation ppt
 
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safetyBiological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
 
Biological effects of radiation.ppt
Biological effects of radiation.pptBiological effects of radiation.ppt
Biological effects of radiation.ppt
 
Radiation diseases
Radiation diseasesRadiation diseases
Radiation diseases
 
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.pptZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
 
zom703biologicaleffectsofionizingradiation-221228102135-accdae82.pdf
zom703biologicaleffectsofionizingradiation-221228102135-accdae82.pdfzom703biologicaleffectsofionizingradiation-221228102135-accdae82.pdf
zom703biologicaleffectsofionizingradiation-221228102135-accdae82.pdf
 
BIOLOGICAL%20EFFECTS%20OF%20RADIATION.pptx
BIOLOGICAL%20EFFECTS%20OF%20RADIATION.pptxBIOLOGICAL%20EFFECTS%20OF%20RADIATION.pptx
BIOLOGICAL%20EFFECTS%20OF%20RADIATION.pptx
 
Radiation Biology
Radiation BiologyRadiation Biology
Radiation Biology
 
RADIATION hazards n protection
RADIATION hazards n protectionRADIATION hazards n protection
RADIATION hazards n protection
 
radiation hazards by lalithasravani.
radiation hazards by lalithasravani.radiation hazards by lalithasravani.
radiation hazards by lalithasravani.
 

Último

The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991RKavithamani
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfchloefrazer622
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxSayali Powar
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinRaunakKeshri1
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 

Último (20)

INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
 
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSDStaff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 

Biological effects of radiation- RAVISHWAR NARAYAN

  • 3. • Radiation is all around us. It is naturally present in our environment & comes from outer space (cosmic), the ground (terrestrial), and even from within our own bodies. • Certain foods such as bananas and brazil nuts naturally contain higher levels of radiation than other foods. • Levels of natural or background radiation can vary greatly from one location to the next.
  • 4.
  • 5. Typical Effective Radiation Dose from Diagnostic X Ray—Single Exposure
  • 6.
  • 7. Typical Effective Radiation Dose from Nuclear Medicine Examination
  • 8. • Radiation is of 2 types: – Ionizing (α, β, γ & x-rays) – Nonionizing (visible light, infrared, radiowaves) • Ionizing radiation is subdivided into: – electromagnetic radiation (X-rays and γ rays) – particulate radiation (neutrons, alpha and beta particles).
  • 9. Radiation Biology History • 1895-Roentgen announces discovery of X-rays • 1896-(4 months later) Reports of skin effects in x-ray researchers • 1902-First cases of radiation induced skin cancer reported • 1906-Pattern for differential radiosensitivity of tissues was discovered.
  • 10. • Biological effects of ionizing radiation depend on several factors that make them variable and inconsistent. • The effects are classified based on their nature and timing after exposure into – early or delayed, – somatic or hereditary, – stochastic or deterministic
  • 11.
  • 12. Prompt Effects • High doses delivered to the whole body of healthy adults within short periods of time can produce effects such as blood component changes, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea and death. These effects will develop within hours, days or weeks, depending on the size of the dose. The larger the dose, the sooner a given effect will occur. Effect Dose Blood count changes 50 rem Vomiting (threshold) 100 rem Mortality (threshold) 150 rem LD50/60* (with minimal supportive care) 320 – 360 rem LD50/60 (with supportive medical treatment) 480 – 540 rem 100% mortality (with best available treatment) 800 rem
  • 13. Delayed effects: • effects such as cataract formation and cancer induction that may appear months or years after a radiation exposure *average lifetime risk of death from cancer following an acute dose equivalent to all body organs of 0.1 Sv (10 rem) is estimated to be 0.8%. baseline risk of cancer induction in the United States is approximately 25%.
  • 14. Another way of stating this risk is by considering the Relative Risk of a 1 in a million chance of death from some common activities: · Smoking 1.4 cigarettes in a lifetime (lung cancer) · Eating 40 tablespoons of peanut butter (aflatoxin) · Spending two days in New York City (air pollution) · Driving 40 miles in a car (accident) · Flying 2500 miles in a jet (accident) · Canoeing for 6 minutes (drowning) · Receiving a dose of 10 mrem of radiation (cancer)
  • 15.
  • 16. • Stochastic effects refer to random and unpredictable effects usually following chronic exposure to low dose radiation. E.g. Hereditary effects and carcinogenesis
  • 17. Schematic development of the events leading to stochastic radiation effects
  • 18. • Deterministic (non-stochastic) effects are non- random and have a highly predictable response to radiation. There is a threshold of radiation dose after which the response is dose-related. E.g. radiation-induced lung fibrosis and cataract
  • 20. Ionizing radiation exerts its effects on biological targets through two major mechanism:
  • 21. Direct effect • ionizing radiation acts by direct hits on target atoms. • All atoms or molecules within the cells, such as enzymatic and structural proteins and RNA, are vulnerable to radiation injury but DNA is the principal target, in which ionizing radiation produces single or double-stranded chromosomal breaks.
  • 22. • It is estimated that about one third of biological damage by γ radiation is caused by direct effects. • This process becomes more dominant with high LET radiation, such as neutrons or α particles
  • 23. Indirect Effect • two-thirds of biological damage caused by low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is due to indirect action
  • 24. • Water Radiolysis absorption of energy depends on the abundance of material in the path of the radiation. Water is the most predominant molecule in living organisms, therefore, a major proportion of radiation energy deposited will be absorbed in cellular water. A complex series of chemical changes occurs in water after exposure to ionizing radiation. This process is called water radiolysis
  • 25.
  • 26. • These primary water radicals have high reactivity towards molecules of cells, DNA, lipids and other subcellular constituents. In oxygenated solutions, hydrogen atoms can react with oxygen to give hydroperoxyl free radicals(HO2•) • The relative yields of the water radiolysis products depend on the pH and LET of the radiation. • The concentration of these radicals are expressed in terms of a G value which is defined as the number of radicals or molecules produced per 100 eV of energy absorbed in the medium
  • 28. Factors Related to Ionizing Radiation • Type of Radiation: – Various types of radiation differ in penetrability based on LET. – This value is high for alpha particles, lower for beta particles, and even less for gamma rays and X-rays. Thus alpha particles penetrate a short distance but induce heavy damage,
  • 29. • Mode of Administration: – a single dose of radiation causes more damage than the same dose being divided (fractionated) • Dose Rate: – The longer the duration for the same total dose, the better the chance of cellular repair and the smaller the damage
  • 30. Factors Related to Biological Target • Radiosensitivity: – Radiosensitivity varies with the rate of mitosis and cellular maturity. Blood-forming cells are very sensitive to radiation, while neurons, muscle and parathyroid cells are highly radioresistant. With in a given cell, the nucleus in general is relatively more radiosensitive than the cytoplasm. – When cells in G0/G1phase of the cell cycle are exposed to radiation they tend to halt their progression into G2/M phase. G2 synchronization produces a cluster of radiosensitive cells. A second hit within a time frame of 5–12 h leads to a higher proportion of deleterious effects.
  • 31. • Repair Capacity of Cells: • Cell-Cycle Phase: – All phases of the cell cycle can be affected by ionizing radiation. Overall, sensitivity appears to be greatest in G2 phase. – Recovery from sublethal damage occurs in all phases of the cell cycle. However, this is most pronounced in the S phase, which is also the most radio-resistant phase • Degree of Tissue Oxygenation: – Molecular oxygen is known to have the ability to potentiate the response to radiation
  • 33. Radiation lesions in DNA • Radiation causes a wide range of lesions in DNA such as – single strand breaks in the phosphodiester linkage, – double strand breaks on opposing sites or – base damage, – protein-DNA crosslinks and protein-protein crosslinks involving nuclear proteins such as histones and non-histone proteins.
  • 34. • The number of DNA lesions generated by irradiation is large, but the number giving rise to cell kill is extremely small. The numbers of lesions induced in the DNA of a cell by a dose of1-2 Gy are approximately: – base damages > 1000; – single strand breaks (ssb) ~1000; – double strand breaks (dsb) ~40. • Dsb play a critical role in cell killing
  • 35. Fate of Irradiated Cells • No effect. • Division Delay • Apoptosis: cell death before it can divide. • Reproductive Failure: cell death when attempting MITOSIS. • Genomic Instability: delayed reproductive failure. • Mutation: cells contains mutation in genome. • Transformation: mutation leads to carcinogenesis. • Bystander Effects: damaged cell induces damage in surrounding ones. • Adaptative Response: increased resistance to radiation.
  • 36. • Genomic Instability: – Maximal radiation-induced genetic damage is formed shortly (minutes to hours) after radiation exposure. Nevertheless, it has been observed that not only the irradiated cells but also descendents may show delayed effects. – Cells that sustain non-lethal DNA damage show increased mutation rate in descendent cells several generations after the initial exposure
  • 37. • Bystander Effect. – The cells in the vicinity of irradiated cells show effects that cannot be attributed to targeting by ionizing radiation tracks. The mechanism is not clearly understood; however, gap junctional intercellular communication or release of soluble factors (such as cytokines) from irradiated cells has been proposed. Through cell-to-cell interaction, the directly irradiated cells communicate with adjacent cells and spread the effect of radiation to a larger number of cells.
  • 38. Acute effects of radiation
  • 39. • Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) is an acute illness caused by irradiation of the entire body (or most of the body) by a high dose of penetrating radiation in a very short period of time (usually a matter of minutes)
  • 40. • conditions for Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) are: • The radiation dose must be large (i.e., greater than 0.7 Gray (Gy)). – Mild symptoms may be observed with doses as low as 0.3 Gy or 30 rads. • The dose usually must be external ( i.e., the source of radiation is outside of the patient’s body). – Radioactive materials deposited inside the body have produced some ARS effects only in extremely rare cases. • The radiation must be penetrating (i.e., able to reach the internal organs). – High energy X-rays, gamma rays, and neutrons are penetrating radiations. • The entire body (or a significant portion of it) must have received the dose. – Most radiation injuries are local, frequently involving the hands, and these local injuries seldom cause classical signs of ARS. • The dose must have been delivered in a short time (usually a matter of minutes). – Fractionated doses are often used in radiation therapy. These are large total doses delivered in small daily amounts over a period of time. Fractionated doses are less effective at inducing ARS than a single dose of the same magnitude.
  • 41. stages of ARS • Prodromal stage (N-V-D stage): The classic symptoms for this stage are nausea, vomiting, as well as anorexia and possibly diarrhea (depending on dose), which occur from minutes to days following exposure. The symptoms may last (episodically) for minutes up to several days. • Latent stage: In this stage, the patient looks and feels generally healthy for a few hours or even up to a few weeks. • Manifest illness stage: In this stage the symptoms depend on the specific syndrome and last from hours up to several months. • Recovery or death: Most patients who do not recover will die within several months of exposure. The recovery process lasts from several weeks up to two years
  • 42. three classic ARS Syndromes • Bone marrow syndrome (aka: hematopoietic syndrome) occur with a dose between 0.7 and 10 Gy (70 – 1000 rads) though mild symptoms may occur as low as 0.3 Gy or 30 rads. – The survival rate of patients with this syndrome decreases with increasing dose. The primary cause of death is the destruction of the bone marrow, resulting in infection and hemorrhage. • Gastrointestinal (GI) syndrome: occur with a dose greater than approximately 10 Gy (1000 rads) although some symptoms may occur as low as 6 Gy or 600 rads. – Survival is extremely unlikely with this syndrome. Destructive and irreparable changes in the GI tract and bone marrow usually cause infection, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. Death usually occurs within 2 weeks. • Cardiovascular (CV)/ Central Nervous System (CNS) syndrome: occur with a dose greater than approximately 50 Gy (5000 rads) although some symptoms may occur as low as 20 Gy or 2000 rads. – Death occurs within 3 days. Death likely is due to collapse of the circulatory system as well as increased pressure in the confining cranial vault as the result of increased fluid content caused by edema, vasculitis, and meningitis
  • 43.
  • 44. Cutaneus radiation syndrome • It is possible to receive a damaging dose to the skin without symptoms of ARS, especially with acute exposures to beta radiation or X-rays. Sometimes this occurs when radioactive materials contaminate a patient’s skin or clothes. • When the basal cell layer of the skin is damaged by radiation, within a few hours after irradiation, a transient and inconsistent erythema (associated with itching) can occur. Then, a latent phase may occur and last from a few days up to several weeks, when intense reddening, blistering, and ulceration of the irradiated site are visible. • In most cases, healing occurs by regenerative means; however, very large skin doses can cause permanent hair loss, damaged sebaceous and sweat glands, atrophy, fibrosis, decreased or increased skin pigmentation, and ulceration or necrosis of the exposed tissue.
  • 45.
  • 46. Initial Treatment and Diagnostic Evaluation • Treat vomiting, and repeat CBC analysis, with special attention to the lymphocyte count, every 2 to 3 hours for the first 8 to 12 hours following exposure (and every 4 to 6 hours for the following 2 or 3 days). • Sequential changes in absolute lymphocyte counts over time are demonstrated in the Andrews Lymphocyte Nomogram
  • 47. From Andrews GA, Auxier JA, Lushbaugh CC. The Importance of Dosimetry to the Medical Management of Persons Exposed to High Levels of Radiation. In Personal Dosimetry for Radiation Accidents. Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency; 1965
  • 48. • Patients with a minimal lymphocyte count (MLC) of 1000- 1499/mm3 have an approximate absorbed dose of 0.5-1.9 Gy. prognosis is good because the absorbed dose is usually nonlethal. • Patients with MLC of 500-999/mm3 have an approximate absorbed dose of 2.0-3.9 Gy. fair prognosis. • MLC of 100-499/mm3 coincides with an approximate absorbed dose of 4.0-7.9 Gy. poor prognosis, • MLC less than 100/mm3 have an estimated absorbed dose of greater than 8 Gy. high incidence of death despite bone marrow stimulation. • Survival has not been documented for those exposed to greater than 10 Gy.
  • 49. • Time to emesis: – Time to emesis (TE) correlates with exposure dose, decreasing as exposure dose increases. – For TE less than 1 hour, whole-body dose estimates are greater than 4 Gy. – For TE between 1 and 2 hours, whole-body dose is estimated to be greater than 3 Gy. – for TE greater than 4 hours, whole-body dose is estimated to be around 1 Gy.
  • 50. Pharmacologic Therapy for Radiation Injury • Enteral binding agents – Barium sulfate: Adult dose: 200 mL PO x 1 dose Binds with strontium and radium – Aluminum and magnesium salts: Adult dose: 100 mL PO x 1 dose. Binds with strontium, radium, and phosphorous – Activated charcoal
  • 51. • Blockade of end-organ uptake – Potassium iodide: Adult dose: 130 mg PO daily (maximum: 1 dose in 24h) Duration of therapy: Continue daily dose until exposure risk has passed and/or until other measures (eg, evacuation, sheltering, control of the food and milk supply) have been successfully implemented Blocks thyroid uptake of iodine and technetium – Calcium gluconate: Adult dose: 3 g IV x 1 dose Blockade into bone by increasing urinary excretion of radioactive strontium and calcium – Calcium chloride: Adult dose: 1 g IV x 1 dose Blockade into bone by increasing urinary excretion of radioactive strontium and calcium
  • 52. • Dilution – Oral fluids: Adult dose: 5-10 L PO/IV daily x 1wk Excretion of tritium – Neutra Phos: Adult dose: 1 packet (diluted) PO QID x 3d. Excretion of phosphorus – K Phos: Adult dose: 2 tablets PO QID x 3d. Excretion of phosphorus
  • 53. • Chelation – Pentetate trisodium salts(DTPA; Ca-DTPA within 24h, Zn-DTPA after 24h): Adult dose: 1 g IV in 250 mL saline/D5W daily. Chelates americium, uranium, plutonium, heavy metals – Penicillamine: Adult dose: 250-500 mg PO QID. Chelates cobalt – Prussian blue: Adult dose: 3 g PO TID; minimum 30-day treatment. Chelates cesium and thallium
  • 54. • Decrease organ damage – Sodium bicarbonate: Adult dose: 2 mEq/kg IV x 1 dose. Nephroprotective for uranium
  • 56. Acute Radiation Time Post Conception Dose* to the Blastogenesis Organogenesis Fetogenesis (up to 2 wks) (2 –7 wks) (8–15 wks) (16 –25 wks) (26 –38 wks) Embryo/Fetus < 0.05 Gy (5 rads)† Noncancer health effects NOT detectable 0.05–0.50 Gy (5–50 rads) Incidence of failure to • Incidence of • Growth retardation possible implant may increase major slightly, but surviving malformations • Reduction in IQ possible (up to embryos will probably may increase 15 points, depending on dose) have no significant slightly Noncancer health (noncancer) health effects • Incidence of severe mental effects unlikely • Growth retardation up to 20%, depending retardation on dose possible > 0.50 Gy (50 rads) Incidence of failure to • Incidence of • Incidence of miscarriage • Incidence of Incidence of implant will likely be miscarriage may probably will increase, depending miscarriage may miscarriage The expectant mother large,‡depending on dose, increase, on dose increase, depending on and may be experiencing but surviving embryos will depending on dose neonatal acute radiation syndrome probably have no dose • Growth retardation likely death will in this range, depending significant (noncancer) • Growth retardation probably on her whole-body dose. health effects • Substantial risk • Reduction in IQ possible (> 15 possible, depending on increase of major points, depending on dose) dose depending o malformations such as • Incidence of severe mental • Reduction in IQ neurological and retardation > 20%, depending on possible, depending on motor dose dose deficiencies • Incidence of major • Severe mental • Growth malformations will probably retardation possible, retardation likely increase depending on dose • Incidence of major malformations may increase
  • 57. Estimated Risk for Cancer from Prenatal Radiation Exposure Radiation Dose Estimated Childhood Estimated Lifetime‡ Cancer Incidence§ Cancer Incidence* † (exposure at age 10) No radiation exposure 0.3% 38% above background 0.00–0.05 Gy (0–5 rads) 0.3%–1% 38%–40% 0.05–0.50 Gy (5–50 1%–6% 40%–55% rads) > 0.50 Gy (50 rads) > 6% > 55% * Data published by the International Commission on Radiation Protection. † Childhood cancer mortality is roughly half of childhood cancer incidence. ‡ The lifetime cancer risks from prenatal radiation exposure are not yet known. The lifetime risk estimates given are for Japanese males exposed at age 10 years from models published by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. § Lifetime cancer mortality is roughly one third of lifetime cancer incidence.
  • 59. introduction • There are threevmodels predicting relationships between the radiation dose and the effect of such an expo-sure to a biological target. • The differences between these models arise from different underlying assumptions
  • 60. • Linear-No Threshold Model: It assumes that any level of radiation is harmful and that the risk increases linearly with increments of dose. It is applied for radiation protection purposes and is meant to limit the risk to workers in radiation fields.
  • 61.
  • 62. • ThresholdModel: It assumes that the risk of radiation is linearly related to the dose; however, this occurs only after a certain threshold level is exceeded. Below the threshold level no risk is to be expected. The theory behind the threshold level is that some degree of cellular damage should accumulate and produce cell damage.
  • 63. • Hormesis Model: In this model there is a bimodal effect of radiation, where below a certain threshold level radiation is protective, and harmful effects are seen only when this threshold is exceeded. The rationale is that radiation at low levels induces protective cellular mechanisms which prevent DNA damage occurring spontaneously or due to other stresses
  • 64. definition • Hormesis is a concept that describes the nature of dose-response relationships in biological systems as displaying a stimulatory response at low doses and an inhibitory response at higher doses.
  • 65. • The probability of radiation induced adaptive protection measurably outweighs that of damage from doses well below 200 mGy low- LET radiation.
  • 66.
  • 67. Note that mechanisms of DNA damage prevention and repair and the immune stimulation decrease after a maximum at doses between 0.1 Gy and 0.2 Gy, in contrast to apoptosis incidence that increases with dose
  • 68. Single low-dose induced adaptive responses have dif-ferent times of duration depending on protective mechanisms that begin with a delay of several hours and may last for days to weeks – and even up to months for immune response. Note that repair in response to radiation damage begins immediately after damage has occurred.