2. Optimal emission reduction
• Climate change is long-term, global,
uncertain problem
• If you do not care about the distant
future, far-away lands, remote
probabilities, you do not care about climate
change
4. Differences in Values
• Impacts of climate change differ greatly
between countries
• Initially, people just added the monetised
climate change impacts
• This caused a furore, as health risks were
valued differently depending on income
• However, the value of a statistical life is
an empirical quantity, and cannot be
changed
• Instead, one can use different weights for
different countries
5. Equity Weights
• Fankhauser et al:
• This could imply equal values
• That is, national impacts are valued at
world average values
;
1 1
c c
C C
U c Y W
c cW
c c cM
W U Y
D D D
W Y
0 0
1 1 1 1
C C C C
cW W W
c c c c cW
c c c cc c c W
Y Y Y Y
D D V I V I V I
Y Y Y Y
10. What values
• The rates of pure time preference, inequity
aversion, and risk aversion describe how much we
care about the future, others, uncertainties
• Two approaches to such ethical parameters
– Philosophy, religion
• Would what Jesus/Lord Stern/Lady Gaga do?
– Revealed preferences
• What does the average person do?
• Consistency is crucial
– If you don‘t care about Africa in your trade policy,
why do you care about Africa in your environmental
policy?