Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Mindset - A Clash of Mindsets Part 1
1. A clash of mindsets finding a middle way
between different impact
methodologies
Joy Mackeith, Triangle, Joy@triangleconsulting.co.uk
Neil Reeder, London School of
Economics, n.b.reeder@lse.a.uk
Social Impact Analysts Association annual
conference, December 2013
2. Aims of session
• Lessons from practical experience
• Outline of findings from academic research
project
• Initiate debate on key issues arising from
different mindsets
3. Objectivity and subjectivity
(or direct and indirect measurement)
Direct measures (often end
outcomes)
Indirect measures (often
intermediate outcomes)
Things that can be directly
observed, eg housing, offending
Things that cannot be directly
observed but have an impact on
directly observable behaviour, eg
confidence, improved relationships
Associated with direct cost
savings
Associated with sustainability of
outcomes
4. Objectivity and subjectivity: Middle ground
Use both!
Bring objectivity into indirect
outcomes through tools for
standardising professional
judgement or subjective report
ie psychometric tools
Direct measures
Indirect measures
10. Research on validity, reliability and
practical application
Dickens et al (2012) “Recovery Star: validating user recovery” in
the Psychiatrist
Dr Helen Killaspy (2012) “Psychometric properties of Mental
Health Recovery Star in British Journal of Psychiatry
Harris and Andrews (2013) “Implementing the Outcomes Star
well in a multi-disciplinary environment” RMIT University,
Australia (Homelessness Star, Drug and Alcohol Star and
Empowerment Star)
York Consulting (2013) “Family Star Evaluation” published by
Family Action
11. Standardised systems versus case by
case approaches
Standardised systems
Case by case approach
Provides a shared framework
for use across many projects or
people
Responds to the uniqueness
of each project or person
Can be aggregated
Captures all impacts and
reflects values and language
of those being measured
12. Standardised systems versus case by case
approaches : Middle ground
Frameworks that allow case by case
approaches to be analysed within a
standardised system (eg BSC)
Tools that are modified for different
client groups (eg Outcomes Star)
Standardised systems
Case by case approach
13. Example: Big Society Capital Outcomes
Matrix
Outcome Area
Employment Education and
Training
Housing and Local Facilities
Income and Financial Inclusion
Physical Health
Mental Health
Family Friends and
Relationships
Citizenship and community
Arts, Heritage, Sports and Faith
Conservation of the Natural
Environment
Individual
Community, Sector and
Society
14. Example: Outcome Star versions
Recovery Star
(mental health)
Life Star
(Learning
Disabilities)
Work Star
Older Person’s
Star
Youth Star
Empowerment
Star
(domestic
violence)
Teen Star
Well-being Star
(long-term health
conditions)
Spectrum Star
(Autistic spectrum)
Family Star
Community Star
Shooting Star
(schools)
Homelessness
Star
Alcohol Star
Music Therapy
Star
Drug and Alcohol
Star
15. Experimental versus exploratory
approaches
Experimental
Exploratory
Simplify complexity by isolating
one variable and identifying its
impact (ie RCT)
Explore relationships between
variables and recognise complexity
of systems and relationships (eg St
Mungo’s work)
Can produce very persuasive
evidence
Cheaper and can produce richer
insights into cause and effect
16. Experimental versus exploratory
approaches : Middle ground
Look when each approach is
appropriate. Perhaps
experimental approaches
appropriate when sufficient
exploration carried out and in
very stable environments
Experimental
Exploratory
18. Comprehensive versus pragmatic: Middle
ground
Comprehensive provides
good intellectual framework
but measurement in
practice must be pragmatic.
Walk first, run later!
Comprehensive
Pragmatic
Notas del editor
Neil introduces himselfJoy introduces herselfJoy speaks to the aims slideJoy speaks to her slidesNeil takes over on the RCT slide Our intention is for the presentation to last 30 mins (15 mins Joy and 15 mins Neil) and take questions of clarification as we go and then have 30 mins for discussion at the end. We thought we would start that by asking everyone to speak to their neighbour aboutWhat struck me mostThe question I would most like to ask
Commissioners, politicians and social investors tend to be in the Direct Measures camp. Practitioners and managers are more likely to be in the Indirect Measures camp.
Examples of tools for standardising professional judgement areStrengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Children)Honos (mental health)Examples of tools for measuring subjective experience areCORE (counselling)SOUL record (soft outcomes such as confidence in a range of settingsOutcomes Star is a collaborative measure – incorporating both professional and client view and with scales to moderate and standardise scoringsCan use research to link intermediate outcomes to end outcomes so that routine management practice can focus on intermediate outcomes
Star as an example of a tool that brings objectivity into assessment of indirect outcomes through standardising judgements
Brief explanation of how Matrix works
Importance of regulation and quality if carrying out benchmarkingLearning St Mungos have drawn from Star data
At present many/most initiatives do not have sufficiently full understanding of key success factors to make RCT an effective use of (personal view point)Refer to Sue Holltum’s critique of a RCT on Art Therapy