Presented by Barbara Gemmill-Herren during the seminar How to Feed Nine Billion within the Planet’s Boundaries - Agroecology for Food Security & Nutrition organised by the SIANI Expert group on Agriculture Transformation on March 10, 2015. Read more here: http://www.siani.se/expert-groups/agriculture-transformation-low-income-countries-under-environmental-change
Hadapsar ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For...
Agroecology for Food Security and Nutrition
1. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Agroecology for Food
Security and Nutrition
Barbara Gemmill-Herren
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
2. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
• In the recent past: summary of the International Symposium
on Agroecology for Food Security and Nutrtion
18-19 September, 2014
• In the future: plans for 2015 and beyond
3. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Goals of the International Symposium on Agroecology for Food
Security and Nutrtion
18-19 September, 2014
• Provided a forum for taking stock of the current state of science and
practices of Agroecology,
• Facilitated exchange of information on agroecology activities in the
context of the FAO Strategic Framework;
• Produc(ing) scientific proceedings and other information material
4. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Participation
Private sector
Academia
Presenters
Civil Society
IGOs, foundations, media
Government representatives
5. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
From Hainzelin presentation; Inspired from Wezel et al, 2009
Agroecology
Scientific Disciplines
Ecology of
plots, fields,
herds
Ecology
of
Food systems
Ecology
of
agrosystems
Environ-
mentalism
Rural
Development
Sustainable
agriculture
Technologies
Social MovementPractices
5
6. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Opening Plenary
• 97% of all the farms in the
world are family farms (500
million households)
• 70% of the active farmers are
women
• They produce about 50% of the
food consumed by humans,
farming on 20% of the land
• The world produces 2720 Kcal
of food per person per day
(1800-2100 are required)
From Tittonell presentation
7. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Opening Plenary
Problems with the current food
system:
Breaking vicious cycles of food
insecurity and turning them into
“virtuous” circles and synergies
Healthy soils are linked to healthy
crops and healthy diets. There is a
variable crop response to nutrient
inputs. Where soils are degraded
there is usually a poor response to
fertilizers. This applies to 25 percent
of soils worldwide. Farmers cannot
afford to use fertilizers if they are not
effective. Creating socio-ecological virtuous cycles
From Mapfumo presentation
8. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Opening Plenary
Systems approaches: Systems need to fit the reality of farmers. The local
context must be of greater importance: a shift from “ready-to-use” to “custom-
made” cropping systems put the producers at the center of local innovation
systems, to combine technologies and traditional knowledge.
9. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Adapted from M. Griffon 2013
Natural
ecosystem
Conventional
intensified
farming
systems
Agro-
ecological
farming
systems
Uniformization
Simplification
Degradation
Regulated
dynamics
Natural
dynamics
Traditional
farming
systems with
no input
Diversification
“Complexification”
“aggradation”
10. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Opening Plenary
Up scaling of Agroecological approaches are based on enhancing interactions,
between functional biodiversity on farms (beneficial insects, etc.) but also
between people.
Smallholders and communities can be empowered through agroecology to
expand their production frontiers.
AfJARE Vol 8 No 1 Mashavave et al.
The network structure for non-participant farmers (Figure 2) had fewer dense connections
(ties) compared to that for participant farmers (see Figure 1), suggesting weak collaboration
within the network. Still, intergenerational knowledge was the most outwardly projected
source of information. Within this network type, farmers’ knowledge is usually viewed as
‘know-how’ and not acceptable by scientific research standards (Hagmann et al. 1998). Other
less common sources of information were universities and direct research, as evidenced by
their projection and few connections. Extension was viewed as the medium through which
research-based knowledge was passed on to farmers, as evidenced by the lack of direct links
between the farmer and research. Innovation dissemination was mainly through
national/private extension agents (Roux et al. 2006) or farmer unions. There were few spaces
along the value chains where farmers, extension agents and other agro-service providers met
regularly to collectively develop/share new knowledge and strategies. This subsequently
limited the farmers’ ability to realise economies of scale and hindered the farmers from
developing stable relationships with suppliers or traders. Currently, exchanges with local
farmers were mostly incidental and consisted of informal dialogue devoid of sufficient
information to constitute ‘purposeful interaction’. Generally, farmer-to-farmer interactions
were along dimensions such as age, religion and gender, a characteristic known as homophily
in social network analysis (McPherson et al. 2001; Leonard et al. 2008).
Note: Black circles indicate sources of ISFM information and knowledge, while grey squares indicate platforms
for access to and sharing ISFM information)
Figure 2: Structural layout for non-participant smallholder social network in Chinyika,
Makoni District, Zimbabwe
Besides extension meetings, other identified platforms for access to and sharing of
information included field days, agricultural shows, external workshops and Master Farmer
AfJARE Vol 8 No 1 Mashavave et al.
Note: Black circles indicate sources of ISFM information and knowledge, while grey squares indicate platforms
for access to and sharing ISFM information)
Figure 1: Social network structural layout for learning alliance participants in
Chinyika, Makoni District, Zimbabwe
The most outwardly projected platforms were exchange visits with local farmers
Without innovation
platforms/learning centres
(Zimbabwe)
With innovation platforms/learning
centres (Zimbabwe)
From Mapfumo presentation
11. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Opening Plenary
Enabling conditions:
There is a need for enabling
environments in favour of Agroecology:
for transition policies for family
agriculture, incentives for ecosystem
services, etc.
Agrobiodiversity, a key component of
resilience, must remain accessible to
small farmers as their a capital for
future adaptation.
12. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Scientific Session on Ecological Approaches
• Addressing global challenges in
achieving food and nutrition security
through Agroecology by re-introducing
biological complexity
• Agroecological systems are complex
and knowledge intensive
• Caring for the environment should be a
means to achieve other goals (not an
afterthought). There are win-win
opportunities to close yield gaps and
environmental gaps.
13. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Belowground interactions, and root zone management in intercropping
systems in China have been shown to influence yields up to 50%
From Zhang presentation
14. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
From Kasina presentation
Yields of pollinator-dependent crops can be increased by more than 40% in diverse
smallholder system with wild pollinators; but this same increase is not possible in large
monocultures with only managed honey bees
15. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
agroecological
conventional
0
200
400
600
800
Nica
Honds
Guate
Number of mudslides
After Hurricane Mitch,
Central America
From Nicholls presentation
Key points from Scientific Session on Building Synergies
16. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Species name Jan Feb Mar April May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Vit C Vit A
Lantana camara
Carica papaya + +++
Mangifera indica + +++
Musa x paradisiaca
Eriobotrya japonica +++
Morus alba (+)
Tamarindus indica
Syzygium spp. +++
Annona reticulata (+)
Psidium guajava +++ +
Punica granatum
Casimiroa edulis (+)
Vangueria madagascariensis
Citrus limon +
Citrus sinensis +
Vitex payos +++
Persea americana
Passiflora edulis +
Pappea capensis
Balanites aegyptiaca (+)
Carissa edulis
Available species 2 4 6 4 4 5 4 2 3 1 2 2
Hunger
gapFruit tree portfolio
in Machakos,
Kenya for vitamin
supply:
Vitamin A and
C supply possible
year-round, where
farms are diverse
From Prabhu presentation
Key points from Scientific Session on Building Synergies
17. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Scientific Session on Building Synergies
• Viable food systems need the involvement of
diverse groups in food social programmes
(alliances, wider coalitions, partnerships)
• Integrated crop-livestock systems address
many synergies
18. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Scientific Session on People and Economics
From Vanloqueren presentation
Nitrogen-fixing trees and shrubs in
Zambia
19. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Scientific Session on People and Economics
• Chronic health issues due to loss
of traditional diets and farming
practices
From Miller presentation
20. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Scientific Session on People and Economics
• The connections between agroecology, markets and the private sector
need to be further investigated and developed. Alternative markets may
help to reconnect producers and consumers.
21. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key points from Scientific Session on People and Economics
• Horizontal (farmer to
farmer) communication and
exchange is a powerful
mechanism for uptake and
spread of agroecological
practices
• Local knowledge of
biodiversity and use, that of
women, is as important as
that of men and that
emphasis should be put on
the knowledge generated
and maintained by women
Reference tree
Before After
From Rosset presentation, above, and Salgado presentation, below
22. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Agroecology in Practice: Africa, Asia, Latin America & Worldwide
23. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Agroecology in Practice: Africa, Asia, Latin America & Worldwide
24. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key messages identified by many speakers during the Symposium
were:
• That various understandings of Agroecology exist;
• The importance of agroecological approaches in achieving
food security and increasing resilience to climate change;
Most losses in resilience are unintended consequences
of a narrow focus on efficiency, and a neglect of
diversity
• The strong linkages between Agroecology and Family
Farming;
25. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key messages identified by many speakers during the Symposium
were:
• The need for increased research including farmer-to-farmer
and farmer to scientists platforms
• That there are no “one size fits all” solutions but rather that
agroecological approaches will be location specific
26. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key messages identified by many speakers during the Symposium
were:
• The existence of a great number of agroecological practices
used by farmers around the world, that provide significant
benefits for agricultural production and producers’
livelihoods, as a basis for any scaling up of Agroecology
27. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Key messages identified by many speakers during the Symposium
were:
• The lack of an overview of agroecological practices and a
proposed global “census” on Agroecology;
• Challenges to mainstream Agroecology remain, but
speakers indicated their readiness to strengthen
Agroecology;
• The need for FAO to continue to provide a forum for
dialogue and to facilitate technical and knowledge-based
input.
28. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
What next in 2015 and beyond?
• Planning of three regional meetings on Agroecology in Latin America,
Africa and Asia
o Latin America: in Brasilia in June
o Africa: in possibly Senegal, in September
o Asia: tbd
• Collecting elements to strengthen the evidence base for Agroecology
• Work on farmer-researcher networks and other relevant mechanisms to
strengthen the link between Agroecology and traditional and local
knowledge
• Work on policy mechanisms (supporting EOA in Africa, TEEB, SEEA-Agri,
CBD focus on agriculture and biodiversity)
29. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
30. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
31. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
32. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
33. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Articulation of policy measures to
enable implemation of
agroecological approaches:
Including:
• Including agroecological
inputs in FAOSTAT
• accounting for natural capital
• connecting consumers with
producers; local food systems
• local government policies
• alternative seed legislation
• support for pollination services
• governance of ecosystem
services by indigenous and
local communities
34. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
35. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Valuing Ecosystem Services: How do these integrate across a landscape?
In the Philippines…
Food
Water
Fodder
Carbon
Sequestration
Erosion
prevention
Biological Control
Maintenance
of soil fertility
Recreation
and Tourism
Diet diversity
Genetic diversity
36. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection DepartmentAssessment of multiple goods and services in Asian Rice
Production Systems
Maintenance
of soil fertility
37. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for
Agriculture (TEEB-Agri)
Theecologists’idea
38. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for
Agriculture (TEEB-Agri)
Theaccountants’idea
39. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
Systems of Environmental-Economic Accounting,
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Casestudiescariedoutin
Indonesia,Guatemala,
AustraliaandCanada;
guidelinesunder
development
40. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans
41. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
for a world without hunger
Agriculture and
Consumer Protection Department
THANK YOU
Notas del editor
Overview of the reports and summaries from the scientific sessions and from the “Agroecology in Practice” sessions. Not a comprehensive report, which is being drafted – with papers being compiled and edited into a proceedings. But we have tried to present as well a small sampling of some of the evidence and examples presented in the course of the symposium.
provide a forum for taking stock of the current state of science and practices of Agroecology, as well as for science-based initiatives underway around the world and thus contribute to the development of an international framework for research on Agroecology, with consideration of economic, social and environmental aspects in developed and developing countries;
facilitate exchange of information on agro-ecology activities in the context of the FAO Strategic Framework;
produce scientific proceedings and other information material for web sharing (e.g. posters, case studies of agroecological practices and video interviews).
provide a forum for taking stock of the current state of science and practices of Agroecology, as well as for science-based initiatives underway around the world and thus contribute to the development of an international framework for research on Agroecology, with consideration of economic, social and environmental aspects in developed and developing countries;
facilitate exchange of information on agro-ecology activities in the context of the FAO Strategic Framework;
produce scientific proceedings and other information material for web sharing (e.g. posters, case studies of agroecological practices and video interviews).
Registration was open to outside participants, upon submission of an application giving expressions of interest, the person’s background, and whether or not they would submit a poster. 70% of all applications were accepted, about 90 posters were received. Participants came from 90 countries.
Agroecology is simultaneously a science (food systems focus), a set of practices (grounded in local experience), and a social movement
Key statistics in setting out the
Problems with the current food system: prevailing issues of high food insecurity and climate change are well noted, but less obvious are problems linked to soils: nutrient mining, soil erosion, soil organic carbon depletion. Breaking these vicious cycles and turning them into “virtuous” circles and synergies is key
Evidence of nutrient mining; areas in Southern Africa where maize yields continue to decline after nine years of continuous cropping, leading to poor responses to fertilizer and water inputs to “kick-start” the soils into responding
Harnessing ecological processes to increase biomass productivity Indigenous legume fallows
Not in AGROVOC – a thesaurus for agriculture maintained by FAO
Learning centre’ is a field-based interactive platform integrating local, conventional and emerging knowledge on superior agricultural innovations requiring promotion or farm-level adaptive testing to address complex problems
or investment.
Smallholders and communities can be empowered through agroecology to expand their production frontiers.
Equipping farmers and actors with the principles - no prescriptions
Self-mobilization and Self-organizational capacity of participating farmers
Went back after our process research to reflect on what farmers do: drawing their and our lessons into principles (scalable)
Smallholder farmers within learning alliances had a denser network structure of social interactions and were faster to adopt innovations.
There is a need for enabling environments in favour of Agroecology: for transition policies for family agriculture, incentives for ecosystem services, etc.
Agrobiodiversity, a key component of resilience, must remain accessible to small farmers as their a capital for future adaptation .
Speakers at this seesion suggested that it is possible to move from a high reliance on chemical inputs and to achieve a greater quality and quantity of production, while addressing global challenges in achieving food and nutrition security.
This is implemented by re-introducing biological complexity (particularly increasing plant diversity, perennial cover, functional redundancies, and presence of trees).
Agroecological systems are complex and knowledge intensive (requiring a transition phase); family farmers need to be convinced to accept risks associated with innovation, and technical changes must fit within local resource constraints.
Caring for the environment should not be an afterthought. There are win-win opportunities to close yield gaps and environmental gaps
Farmers that have adopted agroecological systems are more resilient to climate change and recover rapidly when faced with impacts
lost 18 per cent less arable land to mudslides than conventional plots and had 69 per cent less gully erosion
compared to conventional farms (results from large-scale study on 180 communities of smallholders)
The global nutrition and agricultural communities need to find innovative ways to increase FV production and consumption to meet population health needs, particularly in low-income countries.
Vitamin A supply from diverse fruit farm
Vitamin C supply from diverse fruit farm
Fruit tree diversity can contribute to addressing nutrition deficits and increasing incomes (while integrating gender
Quantitative data on the effect of Agroecology on employment are mostly missing, but the existing case studies point to Agroecology being a net creator of income and jobs. Return to labour per person day of
agroforestry exceeds local daily ag. wage
“For the three agroforestry practices, the return to labour per person day was $2.63 for Gliricidia, $2.41 for Sesbania and $1.90 for Tephrosia fallow”. (Daily ag wage = approx. $0.60)
“In rural areas where road infrastructure is poor and transport costs of fertiliser are high, agroforestry practices are most likely to outperform fertilised maize in both absolute and relative profitability terms.”
Externalities (nutrition, resilience, …) to be added
“The IRR of all the production practices is higher than the discount rate. It is over 100% for the conventional land soil fertility practices (with or without fertiliser) and ranges from 83% to 99% for agroforestry practices.”
Paradigm shift : from labour-saving to employment-generating techniques and policies
Labour-saving policies have generally been prioritized by governments
Creation of employment in rural areas in developing countries is an advantage rather than a liability and may slow down rural-urban migration
(underemployment is currently massive, and demographic growth remains high)
It is well documented that populations experience a sharp increase in the prevalence of many
chronic diseases-- including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, autoimmune diseases,
cancer and depression-- when they abandon a traditional lifestyle based on diversified
farms in favor of a more industrial one.
Research shows that the nutrition transition is an
independent and significant contributor to this health decline.
To better understand this dietary
transition, most investigations have focused on identifying the ingredients within the standard
industrialized diet that are potential promoters of disease such as sugar sweetened beverages,
processed oil and refined carbohydrates. By contrast, this report focuses on understanding the
protective dietary factors that are left behind when individuals no longer are connected to a
system of agriculture based on agroecological principles.
Key points from Agroecology in Practice: Latin America and Europe
(Colombia) CIPAV Family is the unit at which results need to be achieved. Central to this process is building social cohesion and involving civil society. Youth involvement : exchange programme allows young farmers to train as researcher while you are also learning to farm
Despite small farm size, soil restoration, water conservation, water harvesting, diverse crops (staple grains and vegetables) through organic inputs, improved seeds have led to improved diet, livelihoods and income
Sustainably managed with silvopastoral systems: Tool for rehabilitating degraded lands- intensive biomass production, nitrogen fixation, soil biological activity
(Argentina) Integral agro-ecological and biodynamic farms can successfully improve health, livelihood and food security in areas with greatest risk (fluctuating markets, climate change and rural poverty)
4(Brazil) Smallholder agroecological approaches and solidarity can be successful in addressing multiple challenges of small land area, water scarcity, limited access to credit etc. - agroecological practices can help to restore water sources with the recovery of soils and vegetation cover.
(France) Scale of action cannot be individual, it needs to be collective and act at landscape level, for instance in order to reintegrate livestock in the system.
(France) Innovations by agroecological farmers are in response to technological constraints/failures in relation to issues of weed resistance, loss of soil fertility, pesticide-related health problems.
(Action Aid- Nepal and Ghana) Main producers are women, but they are invisible in the community; agroecological projects can bring them to the center and reinforce gender, equity and women’ s rights, livelihoods and income
Cuba) Support by the national association over 27 years has led to rapid expansion of intensive organic gardens on small plots of land in urban areas for family consumption of fresh vegetables and fruits (by those not previously involved in agriculture including youth,
Key points from Agroecology in Practice Africa and Asia
The Symposium highlighted the importance of enhancing farmers –to-farmers knowledge and sharing of information and experiences. Farmers from different economic, social and environmental conditions spoke from their respective experiences and technologies and pointed out the importance of FAO and other Organism to promote this exchange of knowledge and collaboration.
integrated systems from production (Mulching with wood twigs- left over from foresty operations) to harvesting and processing.
FFS have added value to extension services especially by providing a platform for experimentation. FFS goes hand and hand with adaptation to climate change. FFS have also prompted policy makers’ decision making with regard to use of external inputs in a number of countries.
We should think of creating an Extension Space and not Extension Systems going to farmers and telling them what to do.
There is a room to continue the discussion which has started during this symposium on agro-ecology organized by FAO.
There needs to be coherence between policies. There may also be opportunities to build synergies between different approaches (e.g. the principles of agroecology could help build greater resilience as a ‘climate smart’ agricultural approach). Resilience in drought years- not increasing yields, sustaining yields.
400 participants, 62 FAO members (national govts. & EU), 66 articles in the media
Problems with the current food system: prevailing issues of high food insecurity and climate change are well noted, but less obvious are problems linked to soils: nutrient mining, soil erosion, soil organic carbon depletion. Breaking these vicious cycles and turning them into “virtuous” circles and synergies is key
Problems with the current food system: prevailing issues of high food insecurity and climate change are well noted, but less obvious are problems linked to soils: nutrient mining, soil erosion, soil organic carbon depletion. Breaking these vicious cycles and turning them into “virtuous” circles and synergies is key
Problems with the current food system: prevailing issues of high food insecurity and climate change are well noted, but less obvious are problems linked to soils: nutrient mining, soil erosion, soil organic carbon depletion. Breaking these vicious cycles and turning them into “virtuous” circles and synergies is key
Problems with the current food system: prevailing issues of high food insecurity and climate change are well noted, but less obvious are problems linked to soils: nutrient mining, soil erosion, soil organic carbon depletion. Breaking these vicious cycles and turning them into “virtuous” circles and synergies is key
Problems with the current food system: prevailing issues of high food insecurity and climate change are well noted, but less obvious are problems linked to soils: nutrient mining, soil erosion, soil organic carbon depletion. Breaking these vicious cycles and turning them into “virtuous” circles and synergies is key
Problems with the current food system: prevailing issues of high food insecurity and climate change are well noted, but less obvious are problems linked to soils: nutrient mining, soil erosion, soil organic carbon depletion. Breaking these vicious cycles and turning them into “virtuous” circles and synergies is key
provide a forum for taking stock of the current state of science and practices of Agroecology, as well as for science-based initiatives underway around the world and thus contribute to the development of an international framework for research on Agroecology, with consideration of economic, social and environmental aspects in developed and developing countries;
facilitate exchange of information on agro-ecology activities in the context of the FAO Strategic Framework;
produce scientific proceedings and other information material for web sharing (e.g. posters, case studies of agroecological practices and video interviews).
We identified 155 studies that met these criteria, comprising 21 on conservation agriculture, 32 on integrated farming systems, 20 on integrated pest management, 20 on organic agriculture, 22 on the System of Rice Intensification, and 40 on holistic heritage agricultural systems. These studies contained a total of 676 individual comparisons of agroecological systems (treatments) to a contrasting farming system (controls). Some of the comparisons evaluated multiple ecosystem service outcomes. Of the reviewed comparisons, 602 were suitable for quantitative analysis and this report focuses on these data; 534 comparisons have data on both yield and ecosystem service outcomes,
,
facilitate exchange of information on agro-ecology activities in the context of the FAO Strategic Framework;
produce scientific proceedings and other information material for web sharing (e.g. posters, case studies of agroecological practices and video interviews).
,
facilitate exchange of information on agro-ecology activities in the context of the FAO Strategic Framework;
produce scientific proceedings and other information material for web sharing (e.g. posters, case studies of agroecological practices and video interviews).
,
facilitate exchange of information on agro-ecology activities in the context of the FAO Strategic Framework;
produce scientific proceedings and other information material for web sharing (e.g. posters, case studies of agroecological practices and video interviews).
,
facilitate exchange of information on agro-ecology activities in the context of the FAO Strategic Framework;
produce scientific proceedings and other information material for web sharing (e.g. posters, case studies of agroecological practices and video interviews).