This document summarizes a presentation on a pay-for-performance conservation program in Ohio's Old Woman Creek Watershed. The program aims to motivate farmers to reduce nutrient loss by paying them based on measured reductions rather than practices implemented. Tools like the Nutrient Tracking Tool and BMP Cost Analysis Tool were used to quantify baseline losses, estimate reductions from scenarios, and calculate costs to determine incentive payments. Under the program, three farms with 20 fields and 766 acres enrolled. This resulted in estimated reductions of 4,638 pounds of nitrogen and 116 pounds of phosphorus, earning the farmers $27,257 in incentive payments.
1. Motivating Farmers to Move the Needle on
Nutrient Loss Reduction in
Ohio’s Old Woman Creek Watershed
through Pay-for-Performance Conservation
SWCS Annual Conference
Pittsburgh, PA
July 30th, 2019
2. Presenation Overview
• Concept of pay-for-performance (PFP)
conservation
• Tools and process
• Results - Old Woman Creek watershed
7. The Economic Justification
Market failure
Performance-based incentives can serve as a
“price” for pollution control
Environmental performance becomes
incorporated into farm business planning
8. Work with Farmers to Help Develop
Appropriate Solutions
Steps:
• Identify actions for specific fields (scenarios)
• Estimate nutrient loss reductions and costs
• Provide information to farmers for decision-making
14. Quantifying Cost
• Why do we need to estimate costs?
– Farmers deserve to know.
– We need to know the cost-effectiveness.
• We need a tool that lets the technician
easily produce field-specific cost
estimates.
15. BMP Cost Analysis Tool (BMP-CAT)
• Transparent spreadsheet-based tool
• Simple and quick for the technician
• Easy to fully describe change by
checking boxes
• BMP-CAT program calculates cost/acre
and cost/field
16. BMP Cost Analysis Tool (BMP-CAT)
• Calculate cost-effectiveness
• Paste in nutrient loss information
• BMP-CAT produces tables and graphs
for farmer decision-making
19. Paying for Performance
Old Woman Creek Project:
• Project pays $35/lb P and $5/lb N
• Estimate baseline P losses very low
• Avg. cost/lb P loss reduction = $112
• N losses are much greater
• N loss reductions much less expensive
○ Avg. cost/lb N loss reduction ≈ $2
23. Farmer Sign-up Stats
• Farmers Contacted – 32(mailer)/11(phone call)
• Farms run through NTT -
– # of farms – 5.5
– # fields - 68
– # acres - 1680
– # scenarios run – about 100
• Farms Signed up
– # of farms - 3
– # fields – 20
– # acres – 766
$27,257
In Incentive Payments
Nitrogen Reduced
4,638 lbs
Phosphorus Reduced
116 lbs
24. Pay-for-Performance Conservation:
A How-To Guide
Describes steps and
data needs
Goals:
Reduce transaction costs
Create opportunities for
scale
Funded by Great Lakes
Protection Fund
https://www.winrock.org/project/running-off-pollution-
paying-midwestern-farmers-to-improve-water-quality/