There are some motivational elements for publishing. These elements are important for young researchers and faculty members. We should also keep in mind the quality indices such as h-index or impact factor associated with publications.
1. Motivation for
publishing & quality
indices
Dr S G Deshmukh
Mechanical Engineering Department
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
23 Dec 2019
ISME Author’s workshop , IIT Delhi
2. Purpose of this workshop
To ‘clarify’ and ‘share knowledge’ about the publishing process.
To observe good practice in paper writing.
To provide tips
To encourage all of you to publish in ISME journals
ISME Journals
ISME Journal of Thermofluids
ISME Journal of Mechanics and Design
ISME Journal of Manufacturing Sciences
Follow-up: We are always available to help.
2
3. Acknowledgement
This presentation is based on compilation from various sources (both
online and offline).
Many of the images /photos are taken from the sources available
in public domain.
Thankful to Dr Jitesh Thakkar (IIT Kgp) for his comments/observations.
3
4. Why should I write?
To express myself
To showcase my creativity
To share and disseminate my knowledge base
To widen my network
To enhance my documentation skills
To organize myself
5. Perspective on writing ..1..
Writing is mother of learning !
Active , engaged and involved learning
Experimenting and enhancing your learning
Process of learning to monitor, evaluate, and change your own
Learning and thinking
Different world view
Motivation and emotion
Behavior
Lifelong process that can be nurtured and refined over time
5
6. Perspective on writing ..2..
Psychology of writing is important
Writing is a strategical expertise (Breiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. ,
1987)
Writing is one of the most effective way to learn (Lonka & Ahola,
1995)
Writing is researcher’s main daily activity – everything else is
activated though writing
Writing and reading go together –synergy effect
Nobody ”owns the ideas” – the ideas derive from collaborative
knowledge building
Remember Google scholar's tag line…
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lonka K & Ahola K (1995) instruction: How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education Eur J of Psy of Edu,
6
7. Importance of Documentation
It is important to understand the importance of documentation.
One must be comfortable in documentation and in the habit of writing.
A regular habit is to be formed wherein writing skills are to be honed.
The writing could include: summary of a paper, some observations about
a phenomenon, a critique of the literature, etc. The following could be
opportunities to hone such skills:
Minutes of the meeting between guide and student
Minutes of the proceedings between an expert and you
Observations based on a recent Ph D viva voce attended
Summary of the proceedings of a conference /workshop attended.7
8. Proper Articulation
In the end, what matters is proper articulation of
ideas and work in the form of paper
A paper cannot be built upon unless its components
such as background, literature review, methodology,
discussion, conclusions, etc. are formed and woven
properly.
Intermediate findings must be communicated- may be
through conference papers/social media/notes
8
9. Little ways to motivate yourself for writing..
1 Imagine yourself writing
2 Remind yourself the REASON why you’re writing
3 Commit to a daily goal
4 Let yourself write horribly, just get that 1st draft out!
5 Find a quiet, clean, well-lit place to write
6 Ask a good friend to critique your topic
7 Hang out with successful or self-driven people
8 Challenge yourself on your next article
9 Use tools to help you write better
10 Talk to other writers
11 Write something you can teach
9
Source: Tiffany Sun
https://writingcooperative.com/30-little-ways-to-motivate-yourself-to-write-right-now-9982e80c408d
10. Why should I publish?
For academic pursuits
For sharing my research and findings
For enhancing my visibility (both in print and in
emedia)
For promotion /API purpose
For stimulus
For competitive spirit !!
11. Why do we publish papers ? ..1..
R1- Knowledge contribution
R2- Spreading of research outcome
R3- Enhance author prestige/esteem
R4- Institute/university prestige/esteem
R5- Demonstrate technical leadership
R6- Critical reviewing by subject specialists
11
12. Why do we publish papers ? ..2..
R7- Practical and industrial exposure
enlarged due to publishing
R8- Developing of international profile
R9- Enlarge networking
R10- Job requirement
R11- Personal satisfaction
12
14. Differences: Authors and Readers
There is a difference in perspectives !
Authors are journal (Its quality, impact)focused
Authors concerned about his/her visibility
Readers are article focused
Readers want value for time.
Publish more/read less dichotomy
15. Typical layout of a paper
Title Clearly describes the content
Authors Names and affiliations
Abstract Summarizes what was done
Keywords 4-5 keywords for indexing and abstracting purpose
Introduction Explains the problem at hand
Brief Literature Survey Describes previous work and possible gaps
Methods Explains what methodology /model/experimental set up was used
Result Describes what was observed
Discussion Discusses implications of results
Conclusion Gives summary, limitations and also scope for further work
Acknowledgements Ensures who helped in the process
References Ensures previous work is cited according to established formats
Appendix Provides supplemental data/questionnaire/details of set up
15
16. Enablers for publishing
Make a habit of reading quality papers
Identify good students
Partner with other faculty/institutes
Attend conferences/seminars/workshops
Pursue joint Ph d guidance
Leverage collaboration with others
16
18. Research Evaluation Metrics
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000
232210
Unit 1. Introduction to Research Evaluation
Metrics and Related Indicators.
Unit 2. Innovations in Measuring Science
and Scholarship: Analytical Tools and
Indicators in Evaluation Scholarship
Communications.
Unit 3. Article and Author Level
Measurements, and
Unit 4. Online Citation and Reference
Management Tools.
18
20. Author level indices
Number of citations Total citations received by an article, with data
obtained from a citation database.
Citations per paper Citation divided by number of papers
Citations per year Citations divided by number of years
H-index A scientist has index h if h of [his/her] Np
papers have at least h citations each, and the
other (Np − h) papers have at most h citations
each.
i10-index the number of publications with at least 10
citations
20
21. H-Index : Example
Article # ---- Times Cited
1---- 91
2-----82
3-----45
5-----18
6-----13
7-----12
8 ---- 9
9 ---- 8
10--- 5
11---- 2
12---- 1
An author has index h if h of [his/her] Np papers have at
least h citations each, and the other (Np − h) papers have
at most h citations each
Dr. Jorge E. Hirsch, University of San Diego
22. H-Index: Example
Article # ---- Times Cited
1-----91
2-----82
3-----45
5-----18
6-----13
7-----12
8 ---- 9
9 ---- 8
10--- 5
11---- 2
12---- 1
8 articles have been cited at least 8 or more
times and the remaining articles have been
cited 8 or less
An author has index h if h of [his/her] Np papers have at
least h citations each, and the other (Np − h) papers
have at most h citations each
23. Other metrics
I10 index number of publications with at least 10 citations. The second column has
the "recent" version of this metric which is the number of publications
that have received at least 10 new citations in the last 5 years
M quotient H index / y where y is the number of years since publishing the first paper
g index Given a set of articles] ranked in decreasing order of the number of
citations that they received, the g-index is the (unique) largest number
such that the top g articles received (together) at least g² citations
Field-Weighted
Citation Impact
(FWCI)
The ratio of citations received relative to the expected world average. A
field-weighted citation impact of 1 indicates the expected global average
number of citations have received. More than 1 indicates the expected
global average has been exceeded, and less than 1 shows the expected
global average has not been met.
23
25. Journal level indices
Impact factor a measure of the frequency with which the average
article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.
SCImago Journal
Rank (SJR)
This is a prestige metric with the idea that not all
citation have the same weight . For this reason it
considers the number of citations as well as the
journals where citations come from. This is a
competitive measure to Impact Factor, and is
calculated and published by Scopus .
25
In management domain, ABDC categories of journals are preferred (A*, A, B and C category)
Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality List https://abdc.edu.au/research/abdc-
journal-list/
26. Impact Factor (IF)
Impact factor of a journal is the average number of
citations to those papers that were published during the
two preceding years
Calculation of 2019 IF of a journal:
A = the number of times articles published in 2017
and 2018 were cited by indexed journals during 2019
B = the total number of "citable items" published in
2017 & 2018 .
2019 impact factor = A/B
26
27. Motivation for engagement..
No magic formula
Practice, Practice and Practice !
Identify your own motivational elements and work
on that
Everyone is special !
Through students? Through peers ?Through
collaboration? Through role models ???
28. ???
I don’t have time
I do not know how to
write
I am confused
I do not have adequate
journal support
I am a greenhorn !
I get upset when I get a reject
from a journal
I do not know where to start
English is not my language
My supervisor does not help
me
I have an inferiority complex !
30. Action agenda..
One has to keep himself/herself engaged -
Mechanisms of engagement may vary
Keep publishing
Be systems oriented
Evolve mechanism to get feedback
31. Author “Aaadhar”
ORCID
Open Researcher and
Contributor ID
orcid.org/0000-0002-7043-6948 https://orcid.org/
Scopus ID Author ID: 7102221659 https://www.scopus.com
Web of Science
ResearcherID
E-8267-2013 https://publons.com
31
32. Remarks..
Visibility in digital world is a must (Google
scholar/Scopus) social media(ResearchGate/academia
etc.) – source of motivation?
Open access journals as a viable medium
Webinars/online conferences etc.
Working in 24x7 in a flattened world
32