Part One of this paper provides a case for rejecting the Autochthonous Aryan theory and
proposes an alternative to the Aryan Migration Theory, i.e. it examines why the genetic input from
Central Asia may have been extremely small and how the Spread of IE language and culture in
India might have occurred in trickle in scenarios i.e. when movements of IE speakers were small. It
suggests that the IE speakers first migrated into and settled in the northernmost tip of the subcontinent,
trickled into the plains due to climatic changes in the northernmost tip of India,
synthesized with the Harappans, fused with them and got the upper hand when the transfers of
population from North-West India into the Gangetic plains took place around 1900 BC, and then
desynthesized with whatever was left of the Harappan civilization till it vanished around 1400 BC.
Cultural contacts with West Asia and then with South India would complete the process of Spread
of IE language and culture in India. This paper suggests the need for delinking race with spoken
and written forms of language and culture while studying the identity of the Harappans, analyzes
the role of internal and external migrations in shaping Indian culture and questions some other longheld
assumptions about Post-Harappan India. This paper also suggests that an integrated
framework be developed for studying Ancient India. This paper stresses the need for adopting via
media approaches for resolving the Aryan issue and comes up with a new hypothesis which the
author hopes will be taken up for a debate and discussion. This also proposes a concurrent dating
paradigm and a new heuristic framework which the Author hopes will be useful both for future
cultural studies of Ancient India and for conducting further archeological excavations, and then uses
this framework to make his own inferences about the cultural and religious history of the subcontinent.
The methodology the author adopts is to take the Aryan Migration Theory (1500 BC) as a
base and work backwards to arrive at a fresh set of conclusions. Part Two contains all the major
conclusions such as methods to derive and reconstruct the languages of the IVC, the origin of IA
languages etc.