Renewable Energy & Local Opportunities Event Highlights Local Projects
1. Renewable Energy & Local Opportunities
National programme of free events during June and July 2013 from
Climate UK in partnership with the Department for Energy and Climate Change
25th June 2013 - Chelmsford
8. Ambitious, legally binding targets:
•The Climate Change Act set a target to
reduce emissions by at least 80% by 2050
relative to 1990 levels and by at least 34%
by 2020
•The EU Renewable Energy Directive
requires the UK to meet 15% of energy
demand from renewable sources by 2020
(from 3.8% in 2011)
Legal framework
9. Key renewable technologies
Can be widely
deployed, but issues
with their placement
and public desirability
4. Onshore Wind
In 2020: 24–32TWh/yr
Very large deployment
potential - but deeper /
further out sites are
expensive. Working to
reduce cost by 2020
1. Offshore Wind
In 2020: 33–58TWh/yr
Small contribution to
2020, but potential to
provide much more in
future.
7. Marine Energy
In 2020: 1TWh/yr
Contributes around
40% of total renewable
electricity
3. Biomass Electricity
In 2020: 32–50TWh/yr
The EU defines „renewables‟ widely, as “energy from renewable non-fossil sources.
We can use any of these to meet a target of 15% of energy use in 2020, equal to 220 –
230 TWh of generation. But the following eight technologies will be most important.
Heat from
wood, waste, sewage
etc. mainly for
industrial and
commercial use.
2. Biomass Heat
In 2020: 36–50TWh/yr
Uses electricity to pull
heat from air or ground
(‘reverse refrigerator’).
5. Heat Pumps
In 2020: 16 -22TWh/yr
Classic panels on roofs
to generate electricity
from sunlight. Small to
industrial scale
6. Solar PV
In 2020: 6–18TWh/yr
Much theoretical
potential but must
ensure sustainability.
8. Renewable Transport
In 2020: < 44TWh/yr
Sources: Definition from EU, Directive 2009/28/EC; TWh figures from DECC(2011 and 2012), Renewables Roadmap
10. 31
41
48
54 58
63
2011/12
83-84
2013/14
113-116
2015/16
154-158
2017/18
223-230
2020
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
EnergyGeneratedfromRenewableSources
(TWh)
Target Range through to 2020
Electricity
Heat
Transport
Renewable Energy in the UK: Historic and Projected, 2007 - 2020
Because of the low starting
point, deployment needs to be steep
Sources: DECC(2012), Renewables Roadmap; indicative contribution based on possible sharing of burden as set out in HMG(2009), Renewable Energy Strategy
Electricity
30%Heat
12%
Transport
10%
Indicative contribution: demand
needed from renewables in 2020
Of the three sectors
making up our 2020 goal:
Renewable electricity
has made a good start.
Heat and transport
have challenges
Renewable electricity generation increased from 9.4% in 2011 to 12.5% by the end of 2012.
11. • The Renewables Obligation is currently the
main policy for supporting large scale
renewable electricity deployment. The Feed
in tariff supports smaller scale projects (up
to 5MW).
• RO closes to new generation in 2017
• Contracts for Difference will take over as
our main source of support for large scale
electricity generation projects
• Between 2014 and 2017, new renewable
energy projects will be able to make a one-
off choice between the two mechanisms
Financial Support
13. Delivering investment and jobs
Since 2010 DECC has
recorded investments in large
scale renewable energy
totalling over £29 billion, with
the potential to support
around 30,000 jobs.
Job figures based on ORED analysis of developer announcements
15. Call for Evidence: Part A- on how communities can have more of a
say over, and receive greater economic and wider social benefits
from, hosting onshore wind farms. Part B - examined the latest UK
onshore wind costs.
Over 1000 response from members of the public, NGOs
developers, Local Authorities etc.
Our response was published in June and announced:
• Maintained level of financial support for onshore wind;
• Fivefold increase in community benefits payments;
• Compulsory pre-application consultation;
• Commitment to clear and reliable evidence on the impacts of
onshore wind, through an evidence toolkit;
• Best practice guidance for use by those parties involved in
onshore wind developments;
• Register of community benefits on offer.
Onshore Wind Community
Engagement and Benefits
19. "According to a new U.N. report, the global
warming outlook is much worse than
originally predicted. Which is pretty bad
when they originally predicted it would
destroy the planet." --Jay Leno
20. Climate action
• It is estimated that $1 trillion a year
globally will be invested in „climate
solutions‟ by 2030
• UK Climate Change Bill
• EU 2020 and 2030 targets
• Decarbonise energy by 2050
21.
22. East of England growth
• The East of England has a market value of
£12.9 billion, with 6,234 companies
employing about 103,000 people.
• How much of the $1 trillion investment per
year does it want to attract?
27. Knowledge partnership
• Discover University
• Develop University - Business
• Deploy Business
Government enabled
Local and national
28. Strategic opportunities
• Feed-in-Tariff
• Renewable Heat Incentive
• Green Deal
• Planning changes
• Local authority strategic plans
• Low cost technologies
– In particular following investments over last 4 years
30. East of England: knowledge hub
Clean-tech innovation
Environmental management
Energy technologies
„Green‟ finance
„Green‟ manufacturing Transport innovation
32. Contact details
Dr Aled Jones, Director
Global Sustainability Institute
Tel: 0845 196 2931 (direct)
aled.jones@anglia.ac.uk
http://www.anglia.ac.uk/gsi
39. John Preston 25 June 2013
Introduction
John de Wilton Preston
Director of Planning and Economic Development
for Epping Forest District Council
Chairman of Essex Planning Officer Association
(EPOA)
Chairman of Epping Forest District Council Green
Corporate Working Party
40. John Preston 25 June 2013
Epping Forest District Council
Civic Offices
48. John Preston 25 June 2013
Design
The newly refurbished eco-hub
facility provides affordable
workspace, meeting rooms and
conference facilities.
The exterior space maximises
on the flexibility of the eco-
hub. It has been designed to
allow the remediation of the
existing grounds whilst
increasing the ecological value
of the local area.
49. John Preston 25 June 2013
Blending the historical contest of the
existing stables with contemporary interior
space
Benching and planters
made from re-used
timber
Naturally lit spaces
50. John Preston 25 June 2013
Design achieves a “very good” BREEAM rating
Designed to compliment
the Victoriana
51. John Preston 25 June 2013
Evogreen Photo Votaic site survey
– Buckhurst Court
Location specific
irradiance model
Structural suitability
Electrical capacity
Shade modelling
This information is then assessed to design a unique system
specific to site needs
52. John Preston 25 June 2013
PV site survey Buckhurst Court
The amount of energy produced is guaranteed
for 20 years. Most sites exceed this by around
20%
53. John Preston 25 June 2013
PV site survey Jessop Court
The amount of energy produced is guaranteed
for 20 years.
55. John Preston 25 June 2013
Credits to:
Sarah Creitzman, Environmental Coordinator, EFDC
Stuart Mitchell, Senior Building Surveyor, EFDC
Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
Chris Redman, Management Assistant, EFDC
www.ledhut.co.uk
www.southendymca.org.uk
www.ecohub.org
59. Making energy efficiency our businessMaking energy efficiency our business
Allowable Solutions and
Community Energy Funds
An analysis of viewpoints from
local authorities in the East of England
Jonathan Galton
Climate Consulting (part of the Climate Energy Group)
25th June 2013
60. Making energy efficiency our business
Background
• Proposal for Building Regulations Part L 2016 to include a zero carbon requirement
for new dwellings.
• “Zero carbon” (proposed definition) includes mandatory energy efficiency standard
and “carbon compliance” target.
• Beyond carbon compliance, developers can either meet full zero carbon target
onsite or offset remaining emissions through offsite carbon reduction projects called
“Allowable Solutions”
Making energy efficiency our business
61. Making energy efficiency our business
Background
Allowable Solutions:
Options for Developers
Direct Delivery
Contract an AS
Provider
Pay into Fund
Route A Route B
(Local authority list) (No local authority list)
Community
Energy Fund
Private
Provider
Private Energy
Fund
•Investing in social housing
retrofitting initiatives
•Investing in renewable
energy projects
•Investing in district heating
projects
•Investing via Green Deal
•Investing in embodied
carbon initiatives
• Investing in low-carbon
lighting projects
62. Making energy efficiency our business
Objectives and
Methodology
• Research project conducted with three key objectives in mind:
To explain government proposals for Allowable Solutions and Community Energy
Funds to local authorities.
Collect feedback and opinion from local authorities on these proposals
To learn from local authorities with existing “Carbon Offset Funds”.
• Research methods used:
• Desktop literature review
• Telephone interviews with 13 local authority officers (planners, building
control, sustainability officers).
Making energy efficiency our business
63. Making energy efficiency our business
Results and Analysis (1)
• Most local authorities are open to benefitting from Part L 2016 legislation
with local Allowable Solutions…
Making energy efficiency our business
No. of responses
Social housing
retrofit
Renewable
energy
Decentralised
energy
Green
deal
Low
energy
lighting
Em
bodied
energy
11
5
4 4
2
0
85% of local authorities
interviewed express a
preference for simple
Allowable Solutions
which are easy to deliver
and provide clear benefit
to the community.
64. Making energy efficiency our business
Results and Analysis (2)
• … but many have concerns over limited internal resources and knowledge
and current lack of government clarity
• Limited internal resource was identified a key challenge in implementing
Allowable Solutions.
• However, local authorities with established Carbon Offset Funds have not reported
a significant strain on resourcing when establishing their funds.
• All interview respondents expressed a need for more clarity from
government on its proposals
• NB: We are expecting a further announcement prior to the summer
recess.
• Some respondents doubted whether carbon offset payments could
generate enough income to fund worthwhile projects
• NB: Of the Carbon Offset Funds investigated, one had accrued £2.6
million (since 2008) while another had accrued £65,000 (since 2012)
Making energy efficiency our business
65. Making energy efficiency our business
Results and Analysis (3)
• Some views on using Allowable Solution funding to finance Renewable
Energy installations:
“Solar thermal panels on social housing or larger scale standalone projects
would be most appropriate”
“…small-scale renewable energy projects seem most appropriate for the
district.”
“ Councillors not keen unless direct community benefit from electricity.”
“Renewable energy projects are unlikely to meet tests of additionality as
they are fairly low risk and already receive significant funding.”
Making energy efficiency our business
66. Making energy efficiency our business
Next Steps
• Think about where your organisation fits in:
• How can you benefit from the legislation?
What challenges might you face?
• What can you start doing now?
• Respond to the government’s next consultation on Part L 2016 proposals.
Contact details:
Jonathan Galton
Principal Consultant - Sustainable Planning and Policy
jonathan.galton@climate-consulting.co.uk
020 8633 9807
www.climate-consulting.co.uk
Making energy efficiency our business
68. 1. Which example do you think brings the most positive
benefits to the community? Why?
1. In each example, how would you define the
community? Is this appropriate?
2. How would you administer the community fund in
each example?
3. What could be done to improve these schemes?
4. What benefits do you think renewable energy can
bring to an area? What does this need to be balanced
against?
73. Introduction
• The RSPB‟s response to climate
change and the need to reduce
emissions
• The risks posed to wildlife by
renewable energy deployment
• Ways these risks can be either
avoided or mitigated for
• Plus the potential opportunities
for delivering a net biodiversity
gain
74. Climate change: the greatest
long term threat to wildlife
Black tailed godwit Lapwing
AndyHay(rspb-images.com)
ChrisGomersall(rspb-images.com)
75. What are we doing about it?
Installing solar panels at RSPB Sandwell
Valley, Birmingham
AndyHay,(rspb-images.com)
76. Risks to wildlife
from renewable
energy
• Direct habitat loss and damage
• Disturbance and displacement
• Collision mortality
• Cumulative impacts of multiple
developments
Blanket bog
Curlew
Noctule bat
Blanket bog: Eleanor Bentall (rspb-images.com)
Curlew: Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com)
Noctule: Steve Knell (rspb-images.com
)
77. Renewable
energy
in harmony
with nature
• Strategic planning
• Project level considerations
• Potential to deliver positive
biodiversity gain
Nick Upton (rspb-images.com)
78. From RSPB Research report no.35
“Mapped and written guidance in relation
to birds and onshore wind energy
development in England”
Strategic
planning for
renewables
Key elements from a nature
conservation point of view:
• Robust evidence base
• Spatially-explicit approach
• Sensitivity mapping
• Community and stakeholder
engagement
79. Strategic planning
for renewables:
delivering positives
“Habitat creation or restoration
conforms to the principles contained
in the Clocaenog Statement of
Environmental Planning Principles
(SEMP)...”
80. Project Level
Considerations
• Good siting and design
• Mitigation of predicted impacts
• Early and close collaboration
• Post construction monitoring
John Bridges (rspb-images.com)
81. Take-home messages
• Climate change is here, now. We need renewable energy
projects to happen.
• Strategic planning saves time (and tempers!)
• Project level planning – plan, do, review
• Create harmony: deliver renewables and look
for opportunities to benefit wildlife directly
Nick Upton (rspb-images.com)
82. The RSPB is the country’s largest nature
conservation charity, inspiring everyone to
give nature a home.
84. RWE Innogy PAGE 84
PLANNING FOR WIND ENERGY
Robin Basten
Regional Development Manager
East of England
18.07.2013
85. RWE Innogy PAGE 85
RWE npower renewables
> UK subsidiary of RWE Innogy and one of the UK‟s leading
renewable energy developers and operators
> We operate 21 hydroelectric power schemes, 27 onshore wind
farms and 2 offshore wind farms
– including the UK‟s first major offshore wind farm, North Hoyle
> Employ 453 staff in the UK, from Development to Operation
> During 2012 our renewable energy sites contributed >£1m into
local communities
18/07/2013
86. RWE Innogy PAGE 86
Background
> The NPPF – “Development that is
sustainable should go ahead,
without delay”
> Prime Minister David Cameron
claimed last year that applications
for judicial review hamper economic
growth and that many are
"completely pointless".
– http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/nov/19/david-cameron-
clampdown-judicial-review
> Unprecedented number of onshore
wind planning decisions called in by
the Secretary of State this year
18/07/2013
87. RWE Innogy PAGE 87
NPPF – para 97
> To help increase the use and supply of renewable and low carbon
energy, local planning authorities should recognise the
responsibility on all communities to contribute to energy generation
from renewable or low carbon sources. They should:
– have a positive strategy to promote energy from renewable and
low carbon sources;
– design their policies to maximise renewable and low carbon
energy development while ensuring that adverse impacts are
addressed satisfactorily, including cumulative landscape and
visual impacts
18/07/2013
88. RWE Innogy PAGE 88
Renewable energy mapping
site selection
> Regional capacity studies undertaken such as the East of
England Renewable Energy Capacity Study & Maps [Aecom]
the evidence base
> Study undertaken by RWE nrl earlier this year
– 236 LPAs policy documents scrutinised – looking at regional
guidance and more detailed local planning documents
– 65 LPAs carried site specific guidance
– Application of high level constraints – wind speed, cumulative
impact, proximity to settlements and site size
• Reduced total of 22 LPAs and 108 sites
18/07/2013
89. RWE Innogy PAGE 89
A plan led system?
> Are these studies recognised?
> Council statements about renewable
energy and Economic
Development?
> „the proposal is not therefore
considered to be sustainable
development‟
> Community acceptance?
> Adverse impacts?
18/07/2013
90. RWE Innogy PAGE 90
The planning balance
> Current planning decisions on onshore wind are not always
reflecting a locally-led planning system. New planning guidance
supporting the planning framework from DCLG will make clear that
the need for renewable energy does not automatically override
environmental protections and the planning concerns of local
communities. [DECC/DCLG 06-06-2013]
> When determining planning applications, local planning authorities
should:
– approve the application if its impacts are (or can be made)
acceptable. [NPPF para 98]
18/07/2013
91. RWE Innogy PAGE 91
“adverse impacts”
> My attention was drawn to places where the turbines would be
seen in juxtaposition with Churches. However, a wind turbine and
a Church are legible as different objects with different functions. I
do not consider that there would be any significant competition
between them or any visual confusion as a result of the
juxtaposition. [Para 27, APP/F2415/A/09/2109745]
> As individual objects, if carefully designed and proportioned a wind
turbine or a meteorological mast can attain a degree of elegance
as a sculptural object, notwithstanding their scale and consequent
landscape impact. [Para 28, APP/F2415/A/09/2109745]
> The current landscape is what it is… [Para 39,
APP/Y2810/A/11/2164759]
18/07/2013
92. RWE Innogy PAGE 92
Engagement
> As part of the measures, the Government will make pre-
application consultation with local communities compulsory for
the more significant onshore wind applications [DECC/DCLG 06-
06-2013]
> Preparation of planning applications already involves consultation
with a wide range of statutory stakeholders and communities
> National stakeholders suffering from financial curtailment
> Community consultation – early & meaningful
18/07/2013
93. RWE Innogy PAGE 93
Localism
> Not much has changed – excepting increased
expectation from local communities!
> Pre-determination changes now enable Local
Councillors to engage in discussions – to
better represent constituents and encourage
democratic debate
– This is a change that has not really worked
its way into practice
– Implementation will facilitate engagement
18/07/2013
94. RWE Innogy PAGE 94
Community Benefit –bribe or benefit?
> an increase in the recommended
community benefit package in England
from £1,000/MW of installed capacity per
year, to £5,000/MW/year for the lifetime
of the windfarm. [DECC/DCLG 06-06-
2013]
> Little Cheyne Court wind farm
– £60,000 pa community fund
– Decisions about grant applications are
made by a panel of local community
members.
> >£1m pa paid into community initiatives
18/07/2013
95. RWE Innogy PAGE 95
Economic Development
> In 2010/2011 RWE npower renewables invested almost £1 billion
into renewable energy projects in the UK. During 2012 we invested
a further £500 million into UK renewable energy projects.
> For every £1 spent by our Civils contractors for our Novar II wind
farm in Scotland, between £1.93 to £2.31 was generated in the
wider region. The multiplier effect on the Scottish economy as a
whole is estimated as between £2.30 to £2.44. More than double
the initial £1 spend!
> For our onshore wind farms we generally agree:
– four major contracts – turbines, electrical, civil, grid
– up to 40 minor contracts – for example, site investigation,
resident engineers, tree felling
– the entire project might contain up to 200 contracts, large and
small.
18/07/2013
96. RWE Innogy PAGE 96
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR
YOUR ATTENTION.
18.07.2013
99. Please nominate a scribe to capture group a discussion
about the following points:
The Barriers
Please consider organisational barriers and those with
stakeholder engagement as well as barriers in technology
and public perception.
The Opportunities
Please consider opportunities for organisations and for areas
as a whole, e.g. reputational and financial opportunities as
well as jobs, growth, investment into an area, etc.
What would help?
At the end of the session you will be asked to feedback one
point to the group as a whole.
I’m going to set out why the UK is committed to renewables as part of a cost effective, diverse and low carbon energy mix. Why we are required to deliver this, how we are going about it – including the financial costs associated with this – the investment it brings to the country, the issue of public support for this programme and then looking in more detail at onshore wind how we are attempting to ensure communities that host onshore wind are appropriately recognised for their role. I’ve allowed time for questions at the end of my presentation. If you have any questions that can’t wait until then please ask. If you don’t get a chance to ask a question or one springs to mind during the course of the day, don’t worry. Both James and myself are here today so please feel free to grab us during the breaks or at lunch time.
The overwhelming scientific consensus is that human emissions of greenhouse gases since the industrial revolution are responsible for most of the global warming observed over recent decades. There is no longer any serious doubt on this point. We need new and sustainable sources of energy to replace our ageing power stations. Around a fifth of our power plants are set to close by the end of the next decade because they are too old or too polluting. Doing nothing is not an option. We have fantastic renewable assets including some of the best wind and tidal resources in Europe. We can use them to help secure our energy supply and to reduce our vulnerability to unpredictable fossil fuel supplies.The Government is committed to cost effective renewable energy as part of a diverse, low-carbon and secure energy mix.
Legally binding commitment:80% reduction in emissions by 2050 – 34% by 202015% of energy demand by 2020.We are making significant progress in generating more of our energy requirements from renewable resources. In 2011, for example, 3.8% of our energy came from renewables compared to 3.2% in 2010 and we are well placed to meet our goal of 15% by 2020. If we don’t meet these targets, we face infraction proceedings. The cost could be billions and it would increase each day that we didn’t meet the target!
So what renewable technologies are DECC focusing on?Offshore windBiomass HeatBiomass ElectricityOnshore windHeat PumpsSolar PVMarine EnergyRenewable TransportNo one source can deliver our objectives. We need to have a mix of renewables technologies, as well as gas, nuclear and carbon capture and storage. We cannot exclude any single technology if we are to meet our objectives and ensure secure, low carbon energy generation. Why does the Government support renewable energy?The UK must replace around a fifth of its existing electricity generation over the next decade –need to call on all the tools at our disposal to keep the lights on. This requires a balanced energy policy, comprising a mix of nuclear, fossil fuels with carbon capture, and a major roll out of renewables. Generating electricity from renewable technologies is currently more costly than from long-established fossil fuelled technologies. We provide financial support for renewables to ensure that they are viable.
This graph shows the progress the UK has made to date and the trajectory towards the 2020 renewables target. Also shows the interim targets set by European Commission (every 2 years).To date we are on course to achieve next interim target but as you can see towards end of decade we will need to see significant increase in the deployment of renewables.We need to see renewable energy deployed in not just electricity sector but also heat and transport.Electricity doing well- good support structures in place; heat and transport- have some challenges such as sustainability concerns for biofuels and disparate nature of heating solutions make it difficult to roll out across the country.
The RO works by requiring UK electricity suppliers to source a specified and annually increasing proportion of the electricity they supply from renewable sources, or to pay a penalty. Renewables generators receive financial support which starts when they begin to generate and is guaranteed at a certain rate for up to 25 years. This support tops up the revenue they get for selling their energy, so they only get paid for what they actually generate. It is up to suppliers to decide whether to pass the cost of the support on to consumers through their electricity bills.The total cost that can be levied on consumers through the RO and the Feed-in Tariff scheme is controlled within agreed limits by a mechanism called the Levy Control Framework.The Framework was introduced by Treasury in 2011 and is designed to enable DECC achieve its objectives on fuel poverty, energy and climate change in ways which are consistent with economic recovery and minimise impacts on consumer energy bills. From 2017 the RO will be closed and replaced by a new system called the Contracts for Difference (under Electricity Market Reform). This is intended to create a competitive market in which low-carbon technologies compete fairly on price and so deliver the best deal for the consumer. Our analysis estimates that the impact of the Renewables Obligation on average household electricity bills will be an increase of £37 in 2013, of which around half, i.e. £10 (in 2010 prices) is accounted for by wind power (onshore and offshore wind).
Overall our energy and climate change policies will mean an 11% reduction in bills by 2020, compared to no intervention. (from the 2013 Prices and bills report) (including VAT) at the electricity consumption level before the impact of other policies Although global gas prices and network costs have driven household energy bills up in recent years, and are predicted to continue to do so, the Government is pursuing policies aimed at putting a cushion between the price of energy and the bills paid by householders. While some policies are adding to household bills, others lead to reductions, and the net result, based on the most thorough evidence base to date, is that households are on average better off than they would have been in the absence of policies.
In addition to addressing climate change, keeping bills down in the long term renewable energy delivers significant economic benefits across the UK.For example, looking at onshore wind. We know it can bring substantial new economic benefits and job opportunities to the country as a whole and at a local level. Since 2010 DECC has recorded announced investments in onshore wind energy totalling over £3.4bn, with the potential to support around 5,400 jobs. There are an increasing number of companies around the UK involved in manufacturing turbine components and installing, operating and maintaining turbines. This is creating jobs which can often be sourced locally to a development. In addition, development of the onshore wind sector can bring a wide range of more difficult to quantify benefits to local people, including community benefit schemes which reward residents for hosting turbines, community ownership, investment in infrastructure around new developments, and improvement to wildlife and habitat management.
DECC’s latest research shows that 82% of the UK population support renewable energy, just 4% are opposed.This varies by technology: Solar 85%,Wave and tidal 77%,Off-shore wind 76%,On-shore wind 68% and Biomass 64%.Since we started monitoring support has remained fairly constant. If anything it has edged-up slightly.This compares well to other technologies. For example our research shows Nuclear, 40% support, 23% oppose.But this changes when renewables projects are proposed in their locality. DECC’s research shows that 56% would support a large-scale renewable development in their locality and 21 would oppose.So it is a complex issue driven sometimes by misconceptions e.g. onshore wind (a belief that turbines are inefficient, loud, cause health problems) whether the development affects your daily life; how people have been treated/been engaged by the developer. But can also depend upon whether people feel empowered by the development e.g. community ownership, community benefits (e.g. money of their electricity bill, local employment)
In conclusion, Government’s role is to provide a financial support framework to ensure the deployment of renewable energy to meet our targets.We believe it is industry’s role is to ensure a high level of engagement with communities hosting renewable energy and ensure communities see tangible benefits from this. Local authorities’ role is to plan positively for renewables and work with developers to maximise the local economic impact.Turning to onshore wind, we launched a call for evidence in October 2012 on onshore wind community engagement and benefits and costs of onshore wind. Announced a package of measures in June on community engagement and benefits (above) and confirmation that evidence showed onshore wind financial support was appropriate and would not be formally reviewed. This has allowed us tomaintain a stable and certain investment framework that clearly follows the evidence.The community benefits package aims to enable this approach I’ve just summarised. It puts local people at the heart of decision making on onshore wind by changing the balance to ensure that they are consulted earlier and have the skills they need to engage with developers. Best practice guidance will be issued by DECC to onshore wind developers which will lay down the higher standards expected in relation to their engagement with communities. As part of the measures, the Government will make pre-application consultation with local communities compulsory for the more significant onshore wind applications (this is already the case for national infrastructure applications). This will ensure that community engagement takes place at an earlier stage in more cases and may assist in improving the quality of proposed onshore wind developmentWe have also asked Industry to implement a fivefold increase in the amount that developers pay to communities. It will mean that, in England, community benefits packages should be worth at least £5,000 per megawatt of installed capacity for communities every year. Communities and developers will work together to decide how the money should be used – for example, to provide households with money off their energy bills, to pay for energy efficiency initiatives, establish local training projects or fund other community initiatives. Communities agreeing a medium-sized 20MW wind farm could therefore receive a package of benefits worth £100,000 per year, or up to £400 a year off each household’s annual bill.
Ring ouzel – already extinct in the Shropshire Hills and declining fast in the Peak District (as well as other upland areas) possibly due to climate change effects on its upland habitats – gradual drying out causing declines in soil invertebrates.
Photo of solar panel is from Sandwell Valley RSPB Reserve
Peatland at Forsinard RSPB reserve, SutherlandStone curlewNoctule bat
Has been mentioned in both the Conwy and Denbighshire Local Development Plans. The examination in public of the Conwy Local Development Plan took place in March and we’re waiting to see if this policy makes it into the final version.