evaluation report of students performance

2. In 2015-2016 academic year, during the implementation process of Multidisciplinary Flipped
Learning with ICT Project’s first year, the students of Daugavpils Saskanas School worked on the
tasks which are given below.
First Year - First Semester
Improving Digital Skills
First Year - Second Semester
Improving Intercultural Awareness
September 2015
Preparation of the project board
February 2016
Preparing a presentation about the culture
October 2015
Creating the project logo
March 2016
Preparing an e-guide about the culture
December 2015
Preparation a digital postcard – Making an e-
guide about how to make a movie – Preparing a
video about the students’ own school
April 2016
Preparing a presentation about the custom and
etiquette
January 2016
Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying
May 2016
General evaluation of student’s products
At the end of May, the evaluation form, which was prepared in order to assess the students’ all
products by the main coordinator of the project, was filled for each student monthly. The goal of the
evaluation form is to obtain information about the quality degree of the students’ monthly products
and the performance of students. This year, 20 students of Daugavpils Saskanas School have
participated in FLwICT project. The evaluations of our students’ performances are given below in
details as graphics. The scale level for each item represents the least positive value 1 (Poor), 2
(Average), 3 (Above average) and 4 the most positive (Superior).

3. Graphic 1 - September 2015: Preparation of the Project Board
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
They
cooperated
with other
students
Their
motivation is
high
They studied
consistently
and
productively
They
completed the
work on time
They did the
work selflessly
Preparation of the Project Board
4
3
2
1
Graphic 1 shows that all the participants were motivated and cooperative while working on the task.
Also most of the students worked consistently and productively. However, 5 students (20%)
couldn’t completed the work on time.
Graphic 2 - October 2015: Creating the Project Logo
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
They used the
computer
program for
designing the
logo properly
They
designed
really creative
logo
They did the
w ork
selflessly
They
cooperated
w ith other
students
Their
motivation is
high
They studied
consistently
and
productively
They
completed the
w ork on time
They
published the
w ork on the
e-tw inning
w ithout
problems
They
published the
w ork on face
group
Creating the Project Logo

4. We can state that mostly students were motivated and tried to design a creative logo on time. Most
of the students published their work on Face Group. Half of the students didn’t use any computer
programme, as they got used to drawing by hand. 5 students didn’t complete their work on time as
they can’t manage their time effectively. All in all, most of the students stated that they enjoyed
doing creative tasks.
Graphic 3.1 - December 2015: Preparation a digital postcard – Making an e-guide about how
to make a movie – Preparing a video about the students’ own school
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
They used the
logos of
Erasmus+ and
NA correctly
They used the
name of the
project
They defined
the sourced
They improved
language skills
They took care
to use proper
English
They
researched
enough
Digital postcard, an e-guide about how to make a movie, a video about
school
4
3
2
1
Graphic 3.2 - December 2015: Preparation a digital postcard – Making an e-guide about how
to make a movie – Preparing a video about the students’ own school

5. 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
They
cooperated with
other students
Their motivation
is high
They studied
consistently
and productively
They completed
the work on
time
They published
the work on the
e-twinning
without
problems
They published
the work on
face group
Digital postcard, an e-guide about how to make a movie, a video about school.
4
3
2
1
Graphics 3.1 and 3.2 show that students’ answers were rather diverse. As it was the first really
challenging task for them. It can be seen that mostly students were motivated, cooperative and
worked consistently and productively. Almost all students agreed that they improved their language
skills. However, they didn’t manage to fulfill all conditions applying to product design and content.
For example, some students didn’t use the logos or define the source. Also, some students admitted
that they didn’t research enough or take care to use proper English without reminder.
Graphic 4.1 - January 2016: Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying (only for students
who attended the meeting in Italy)
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
They used the
logos of
Erasmus+ and
NA correctly
They used the
name of the
project
They defined
the sourced
They improved
language skills
They took care
to use proper
English
They
researched
enough
Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying
4
3
2
1

6. Graphic 4.2 - January 2016: Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying (only for students
who attended the meeting in Italy)
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
They
cooperated
w ith other
students
Their
motivation is
high
They studied
consistently
and
productively
They
completed
the w ork on
time
They
published the
w ork on the
e-tw inning
w ithout
problems
They
published the
w ork on face
group
Preparing a presentation about Cyberbullying
4
3
2
1
Graphics 4.1 and 4.2 show that all the participants of the Meeting in Italy were very satisfied with
their work. Particularly students emphasized cooperation with their peers.
Graphic 5.1 - February 2016: Preparing a presentation about the culture (only for students who
attended the meeting in Spain)
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
They used the
logos of
Erasmus+ and
NA correctly
They used the
name of the
project
They defined the
sourced
They improved
language skills
They took care to
use proper
English
They researched
enough
Presentation about culture
4
3
2
1

7. Graphic 5.2 - February 2016: Preparing a presentation about the culture (only for students who
attended the meeting in Spain)
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
They
cooperated
w ith other
students
Their
motivation is
high
They studied
consistently
and
productively
They
completed the
w ork on time
They
published the
w ork on the
e-tw inning
w ithout
problems
They
published the
w ork on face
group
Presentation about culture
4
3
2
1
Graphic 6.1 - March 2016: Preparing an e-guide about the culture
0
5
10
15
20
25
They used
the logos of
Erasmus+
and NA
correctly
They used
the name of
the project
They defined
the sourced
They
improved
language
skills
They took
care to use
proper
English
They
researched
enough
Preparing an e-guide about culture
4
3
2
1

8. Graphic 6.2 - March 2016: Preparing an e-guide about the culture
Four students participated in Spain Meeting. According to the responses they didn’t have any
difficulties doing this task. All students evaluated their work as “above average” and “superior”
0
5
10
15
20
25
They
cooperated
w ith other
students
Their
motivation is
high
They studied
consistently
and
productively
They
completed the
w ork on time
They
published the
w ork on the e-
tw inning
w ithout
problems
They
published the
w ork on face
group
Preparing an e-guide about the culture
4
3
2
1
Graphic 7.1 - April 2016: Preparing a presentation about the Customs and Etiquette (only for
students who attended the meeting in Latvia)
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
They used the
logos of
Erasmus+ and
NA correctly
They used the
name of the
project
They defined
the sourced
They improved
language skills
They took care
to use proper
English
They
researched
enough
Prepering a presentation about Customs and Etiquette
4
3
2
1

9. Graphic 7.2 - April 2016: Preparing a presentation about the custom and etiquette (only for
students who attended the meeting in Latvia)
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
They
cooperated w ith
other students
Their motivation
is high
They studied
consistently and
productively
They completed
the w ork on time
They published
the w ork on the
e-tw inning
w ithout
problems
They published
the w ork on
face group
Preparing a presentation about Customs and Etiquette
4
3
2
1
Graphic 7.1 and Graphic 7.2 show that the students who participated in the meeting in Latvia
fulfilled all the requirements for students’ work. Also students stated that they cooperated with peers
and improved their language skills. It can be seen that students were motivated, worked consistently
and productively and published their work on Face Group.
On the basis of the above data, the following conclusions can be drawn:
 The students have improved their English language skills while working on the project
 Mostly all students tried to use proper English while preparing the works.
 Most of the participants cooperated with each other while working on the project tasks.
 As the Graphics show, the students’ motivation was really high.
 Mostly students tried to use computer programs properly especially while preparing
presentations and videos.
 Most of the students are aware of their responsibilities in the project
 Mostly all students studied consistently and productively during the first year of the project.

10.  The vast majority of students tried to use the logos of Erasmus+ and NA, as well as the name
of the project on their products correctly.
 Almost all students published their works on Face group successfully.
Thus, we can state that while working on the project students improved their language,
developed IT skills and communication skills as well as personal skills, such as responsibility
and creativity.
Problems:
 Most of the students didn’t pay enough attention to define the sources on their products.
 It turned out that the main problem for students while working on the project tasks is time
management. Most of the students found it difficult to complete their work on time.
 Most of the students didn’t publish their products on e-twinning platform by themselves but
asked the teacher to do it.