This document discusses the history and developments of tissue clearing techniques. It provides a timeline of key developments from 129 AD to present day, including early animal dissections, the publication of anatomy books in 1543, and the development of light sheet microscopy and two-photon microscopy in the 1990s. Recent years have seen new clearing agents and methods introduced that build on prior techniques to further homogenize tissue refractive index and allow deep tissue imaging while preserving fluorescence and structure.
2. Key concepts
Refractive index
Refractive index variation
Main obstacle to imaging of intact tissues
Refractive index of material needs to be homogeno
http://www.microscopyu.com/articles/formulas/images/refractiveindexf
3. Key concepts
Major types of tissue clearing
Refractive index of material needs to be homogeno
1
Dry the sample
e.g. ethanol,
tetrahydrofuran
Refill with high-
index solvent that
matches the tissue
e.g. BABB, DBE,
glycerol
Fluorophore quenching
Sample shrinkage
3
4
Replace the water in
the tissue with polar
solvents with high
refractive index
e.g. formamide
2
Increase the
refractive index of
the tissue by adding
water-soluble
compounds
e.g. glucose, fructose
Sample expansion
4. More transparency
Fluorochrome degradation
Less transparency
Fluorochrome preservation
Usual problem
https://www.leica-microsystems.com/science-lab/clarity/clearing-procedures-for-deep-tissue-imaging
5. Timeline
First commercial light sheet microscope – Lavision
BABB clearing - Dodt
Deep tissue application of two-photon microscopy - Helmchen
FocusClear – Liu
First light sheet microscope – Voie
Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy - Denk
Superman x-ray vision research – Pittenger JB.
Other derivative procedures - clove oil and cedarwood oil
Method for reducing refractive index variations in tissue - Spalteholz
Publication of 6 anatomy books - Vesallii
Dissection of animals – Galen 129
1543
1914
...1914
1983
1990
1993
2003
2005
2007
2010
20. Scale – Hama 2011
2
Increase the refractive
index of the tissue by
adding water-soluble
compounds
e.g. glucose, fructose
Sample expansion
3 weeks to 6 months
Protein loss
Non-proprietary
21. More GFP friendly agents discovered DBE and tetrahydrofuran – Becker 2012
Gives rise to
3DISCO later
on
…
22. 3DISCO – Ertürk 2012
1
Dry the sample
e.g. ethanol,
tetrahydrofuran
Refill with high-index
solvent that matches
the tissue
e.g. BABB, DBE,
glycerol
Non-proprietary
1 day half-time of
GFP signal
No tissue expansion
No fluorescent
protein quenching
2-5 days
23. Clarity – Chung 2013
Non-proprietary
2 weeks
Good antibody labelling
No fluorophore quenching
Keeps tissue morphology
Custom setup, long protocol
4
24. SeeDB – Ke 2013
3 days
Keeps tissue morphology
No fluorescent protein
quenching
Non-proprietary 1 week
2
Increase the refractive
index of the tissue by
adding water-soluble
compounds
e.g. glucose, fructose
25. ClearT – Kuwajima
2013
2013
3
Replace the water in
the tissue with polar
solvents with high
refractive index
e.g. formamide
1 day - ?
No or mild expansion
Compatible with
lipophilic tracers
Non-proprietary
Not compatible
with fluorescent
proteins
26. iDISCO – Renier
2014
2014
Same as 3DISCO but for large samples
27. CUBIC Whole-brain – Susaki 2014
Mix of compounds joining
the best of many
techniquesSimple clearing and
analysis pipeline
Non-proprietary
5
Single-cell resolution,
axons and dendrites
28. 2014 CUBIC Whole-body – Tainaka 2014
Same as whole-brain
CUBIC but applied to
other organs…
5
29. More applications
Viewing neuronal populations and
projections;
Intact tissue imaging of long-range
projections, , local circuit wiring, cellular
relationships, subcellular structures,
protein complexes, nucleic acids, and
neurotransmitters;
Quantitation of distances of neural stem
cells to blood vessels;
…
30. “Both complete structural analysis (i.e. not reconstructed across tissue
sections) and molecular phenotyping are desired to gain full insights into
the relationships and functional mechanisms of biological systems.”
“Techniques that focus on molecular labelling require thin tissue
sectioning which limits structural reconstruction.”
Advantages
• No damage or thin sectioning required to visualize whole intact tissue samples
• Allows marking and visualization of long-range projections and subcellular structures
• Allows multiple rounds of molecular phenotyping
• Applicable to multiple tissue types and sizes
Disadvantages
• Multiple-step process that takes place over several days/weeks
• Immunostaining is time-consuming for thicker tissue samples
• High start-up and consumable material costs
Advantages of
tissue clearing to sectioning
http://wiki.claritytechniques.org/index.php/Main_Page
Notas del editor
EYFP (green), parvalbumin-positive neurons (red), and GFAP (blue). Permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature 497: 332–37, copyright 2013
1-BABB, 3DISCO, iDISCO
2-SeeDB, scale
3-ClearT
4-Clarity – chemical transformation of tissue instead of optical clearing
5-CUBIC
1543 – Vesallii was born in Brussels which then was still part of the netherlands. Published books at the age of 28
1914 - One option for reducing the refractive index variations in tissue is to remove the water and replace it by an organic compound that has a higher refractive index. Spalteholz described such a treatment with benzyl alcohol and methyl salicylate. He proposed that the final mounting solution must have the same refractive index as the average index of the desiccated material.
1914 - These methods dry the sample with ethanol or tetrahydrofuran and then refill it with a high-index solvent like glycerol, benzyl alcohol-benzyl benzoate (BABB) or dibenzyl ether (DBE).
Disadvantages:
Immunolabelling is only possible before processing and fluorochromes are not stable.
Sample shrinks
Scale – renders tissue transparent and preserves fluorescent signal. Urea based. Increases refractive index of the aqueous phase by adding water soluble compounds – clear technique type 2.