Open educational resources (OER) efficacy research shows that the use of OER does not negatively impact student success metrics such as grades, course completion, retention, and persistence rates. In numerous research studies involving more than 46,00 students across different types of institutions, Hilton (2016) found that students performed comparably in courses using OER vs. traditional materials.
Join us to hear from two 2017-18 Open Education Research Group Fellows as they share their research conducted at a community college and a private university about how high textbooks prices and open textbook adoptions affect students. Regina Gong, from Lansing Community College, will share her research on open textbook adoptions in high-enrollment, multi-section introductory courses (psychology and economics). David Rose, from American University in Washington, DC, will share his research which shows that rising textbook prices similarly affect students at an expensive private university as has been demonstrated at more affordable public institutions (Are Private Universities Exempt from Student Concerns About Textbook Costs? A Survey of Students at American University).
When: Wednesday, December 5th, 11am PT/ 2pm ET
Featured Speakers
David Rose, Online Learning Trainer & Curriculum Designer, American University, Washington, D.C.
Regina Gong, Librarian and OER Project Manager, Lansing Community College, Lansing, MI
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
CCCOER: Impact of OER Adoption Findings
1. Impact of OER Adoption on Cost, Outcomes, and
Stakeholder Perceptions
Dec 5, 2018, 11:00 am PST
Welcome to
image: pixabay.com
2. Agenda
• Introductions
• CCCOER Overview
• Are Private Schools Exempt from Student Concerns About
Textbook Costs?
• The Impact of OER Adoption on Cost, Outcomes, and
Stakeholder Perceptions
• Stay in the Loop
• Spring webinars: TBA
• Q & A
3. Speakers
David Rose
Online Learning Trainer &
Curriculum Designer
American University
Washington, D.C.
Regina Gong
Librarian and OER Project
Manager
Lansing Community College
Lansing, MIModerator:
Una Daly
CCCOER Director
4. ● Expand awareness & access to high-
quality OER
● Support faculty choice & development
● Improve student success
CCCOER Mission
5. Membership Fall 2018 Map
http://cccoer.org/Member
75 CCOER-OEC Members, 11 Systemwide Memberships, 32 U.S. States
Welcome
to
our newest
member:
Grayson
College
8. Are Private Schools Exempt
from Student Concerns About
Textbook Costs?
David Rose
Instructional Designer, American University
OER Research Fellow, Open Education Group
Certificate in OER Librarianship, Designer & Instructor, Open Textbook Network
13. AU Undergraduate Demographics in 2015
84% received need-based financial aid (~82% nationally)
56% received some form of institutional grant/scholarship (~66% nationally)
52% used a loan to pay for their education (~34% nationally)
17.9% were Pell eligible (~34% nationally)
15. Methodology
● Survey conducted in fall 2015, report written in summer 2018
● 13 courses across undergraduate levels, schools/colleges, disciplines
● List price of textbooks $40-$325, with majority $100+
● Drawing for two $25 gift cards to incentivize survey completions
● Method of survey capture was contingent upon professor
● n=110 (365 students invited to participate → 30% response rate)
16. Primary Research Question
Do the coping mechanisms to high textbook prices that have been demonstrated in the research by
students at public universities present themselves in students at private universities as well?
17. Fill in the blanks…
From 1977 to 2015, textbook prices rose by _____% …
… which is over _____ times the rate of inflation and faster than any other consumer product.
The College Board estimates that in 2017-2018, undergraduates could expect to pay $_____ for books
and supplies alone.
Roughly, studies show ___/___ of students don’t purchase required textbooks due to cost concerns.
18. Fill in the blanks…
From 1977 to 2015, textbook prices rose by 1,041% …
… which is over _____ times the rate of inflation and faster than any other consumer product.
The College Board estimates that in 2017-2018, undergraduates could expect to pay $_____ for books
and supplies alone.
Roughly, studies show ___/___ of students don’t purchase required textbooks due to cost concerns.
19. Fill in the blanks…
From 1977 to 2015, textbook prices rose by 1,041% …
… which is over 3 times the rate of inflation and faster than any other consumer product.
The College Board estimates that in 2017-2018, undergraduates could expect to pay $_____ for books
and supplies alone.
Roughly, studies show ___/___ of students don’t purchase required textbooks due to cost concerns.
20. Fill in the blanks…
From 1977 to 2015, textbook prices rose by 1,041% …
… which is over 3 times the rate of inflation and faster than any other consumer product.
The College Board estimates that in 2017-2018, undergraduates could expect to pay $1,170 for books
and supplies alone.
Roughly, studies show ___/___ of students don’t purchase required textbooks due to cost concerns.
21. Fill in the blanks…
From 1977 to 2015, textbook prices rose by 1,041% …
… which is over 3 times the rate of inflation and faster than any other consumer product.
The College Board estimates that in 2017-2018, undergraduates could expect to pay $1,170 for books
and supplies alone.
Roughly, studies show ⅔ of students don’t purchase required textbooks due to cost concerns.
22. 67%
of students surveyed had not purchased a textbook because of cost (Florida Virtual Campus, 2016,
n=22,906)
https://www.flvc.org/research
23. 64%
of students surveyed had not purchased a textbook because of cost (Florida Virtual Campus, 2012,
n=22,129)
24. 65%
of students surveyed had not purchased a textbook because of cost (Florida Virtual Campus, 2010)
25. 65%
of students surveyed had not purchased a textbook because of cost (Student PIRGs, 2014, n=2,039)
https://uspirg.org/reports/usp/fixing-broken-textbook-market
30. Perception of value: “In general, when you prepare for your tests/exams, what
percent of studying do you devote to each of the following?”
31. Learned behavior
● “I think it’s stupid to buy textbooks. Too expensive! Never buy them anymore!”
● “I honestly don’t end up using most of my textbooks. I’ve reached a point where I buy books later
into the semester, and only those I’ve seen used.”
● “They are RIDICULOUSLY expensive and professors often require them when they aren’t
necessary”
● “Class says required and most of the time it's not”
33. “What else would you like to share about how the cost of course materials influences your learning habits?”
34. Negative Effects on Learning
● “When studying, I find highlighting the text is incredibly beneficial. Unfortunately, with the prices of
textbooks I tend to rent rather than buy, as it is more cost effective. With rented textbooks I am not
able to highlight.”
● “Some textbooks are really expensive and I will decide not to buy the hard copy. But digital copy
makes it harder to focus since it's on a digital device”
● “[N]ot buying the book because it is too expensive leaves me to use course reserves but that limits
my access to the information to allow me to succeed in class.”
35. More comments from students who pay $50,000 a year in tuition…
● “I know people who have dropped out of classes because the book was too expensive.”
● “Because books are so expensive, I need to work more hours to pay for them and keep up with monthly
expenses, instead I could use those hours to do school work.”
● “I would buy more of the books if they were cheaper, I don't make enough to spend it all on textbooks”
● “... the cost of textbooks causes significant financial stress on me and takes away from other semester needs
(food, rent, etc.)”
● “I try to stay away from courses that I know require very expensive textbooks”
● “I don't take a certain class because of the expensive or multiple textbooks.”
37. In your academic career, has the cost of required textbooks caused you to:
2012 2016
63.6% 66.5% Not purchase the required textbook
49.2% 47.6% Take fewer courses
45.1% 45.5% Not register for a specific course
33.9% 37.6% Earn a poor grade
26.7% 26.1% Drop a course
17.0% 19.8% Fail a course
Florida Virtual Campus, 2012 vs 2016
42. The Impact of OER Adoption
on Cost, Outcomes, and
Stakeholder Perceptions
Regina Gong, OER Project Manager
Lansing Community College
Community College Consortium for Open Educational Resources
(CCCOER) Webinar
December 5, 2018
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
43. LCC AT A GLANCE
• Founded in 1957 and located in
downtown Lansing
• 26,000 students enrolled/year
• Faculty started using OER in fall
2015 semester
• No grants/stipends/incentives
were offered when we started.
• $500K approved by Board of
Trustees in Fall 2017 semester.
44. Textbook affordability
Allow faculty exploration and innovation in finding new,
better, and less costly ways to deliver quality learning
materials to students in addition to improved pedagogy.
Goals of the OER Initiative at LCC
48. OER Efficacy Research
•Studies show that students assigned OER
have lower withdrawal and drop rates.
•More likely to pass with a C or better.
•Higher persistence and retention rates.
49. Research Study Background
• PSYC 200 (Intro to Psychology)
• ECON 201 (Intro to Economics – Microeconomics)
• ECON 202 (Intro to Economics – Macroeconomics)
ALL sections adopted an open textbook in Fall 2016
50. Research Study Background
Compared publisher textbook use (AY 2015-2016)
vs. open textbook use (AY 2016-2017)
We eliminated the confounding variable of the
instructor
51. Study Population Summary
Control/
Treatment
No. of Faculty No. of
Sections
No. of
Students
Control (2015-
2016 academic
year)
46 126 3,726
Treatment (2016
-2017 academic
year)
46 113 2,876
Total 92 239 6,602
54. • What is the cost of traditional textbooks in PSYC
200, ECON 201, and ECON 202 courses
over the past two academic years (2015-16 and
2016-17) and how much did students save with
an open textbook?
• How much money students report as a typical
amount spent for textbooks each semester for
PSYC 200, ECON 201, and ECON 202?
Cost
55. Outcomes
• Is there a significant difference in PSYC 200, ECON
201, and ECON 202 student grades when comparing a
faculty member using or not using an open textbook?
• Is there a significant difference in PSYC 200, ECON
201, and ECON 202 course withdrawal rates when
comparing a faculty member using or not using an
open textbook?
• Is there a significant difference in PSYC 200, ECON
201, and ECON 202 persistence rates when comparing
a faculty member using or not using an open
textbook?
• Is there a significant difference in PSYC 200, ECON
201, and ECON 202 retention rates when comparing a
faculty member using or not using an open textbook?
•
56. • How has the adoption of open textbooks changed
in PSYC 200 and ECON 201 and ECON 202 courses
at Lansing Community College in the past two
academic years (2015-16 and 2016-17)?
• What is student’s intent to register for PSYC
200, ECON 201, and ECON 202 courses that offer
OER textbook?
• If students had a choice, do they prefer open textbook
or traditional textbook use in their PSYC 200, ECON
201, and ECON 202 classes?
Use
57. • How do PSYC 200, ECON 201, and ECON
202 students perceive the quality of open
textbooks, as compared to traditional
textbooks in other courses?
Perceptions
58. Research Results: Cost
Fall 2016 Spring
2017
Summer
2017
TOTALS
ECON 201 # sections 17 16 6 39
# students 472 444 158 1,074
Cost per
textbook
$78.00 $78.00 $78.00 n/a
Savings $36,816.00 $34,632.00 $12,324.00 $83,772.00
ECON 202 # sections 6 8 3 17
# students 172 214 79 465
Cost per
textbook
$78.00 $78.00 $78.00 n/a
Savings $13.416.00 $16,692.00 $6,162.00 $36,270.00
PSYC 200 # sections 38 30 9 77
# students 1,135 778 195 2,108
Cost per
textbook
$151.25 $154.00 $154.00 n/a
Savings $171,668.75 $119,812.00 $30,030.00 $321,510.75
65. Further observation
• Our recent analysis that looked at 2 years,
demonstrated no significance between OER and non-
OER student success rates.
• The only rate we are seeing a higher average is in
college retention. Our 2 year analysis shows OER
students at about 1.5% higher retention rate
• BUT This is not currently a significant difference, so we
can’t yet say OER has a relationship to retention rates.
• Need to take a look at our longitudinal data to show this
relationship.
66.
67. Forthcoming paper
An Analysis of Cost, Outcomes, Use, and
Perceptions in a Multi-Section Adoption of
Open Textbooks in Introductory
Psychology and Economics Courses
Regina Gong and Karen Hicks
Lansing Community College
70. Stay in the Loop
● Upcoming Conferences
See our website under “Get-Involved”
● Stay in touch thru Community Email
-- https://www.cccoer.org/community-email/
Image: pixabay.com
http://cccoer.org