11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL)

17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
COURT LACKS JURISDICTION
REMINDER: PRETRIAL HEARING –
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2019 – 10:00 A.M.
11/01/19 Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice
Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and
Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion
Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica
International Embassy’s Use Before International
Tribunals…
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL
COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18

17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 1 of 5
c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265 - Jackson, Mississippi 39286
Toll Free - (888) 700-5056 Phone: (601) 885-3324
Website: www.uticainternationalembassy.website
Email: interimpm@uticainternationalembassy.website
November 2, 2019
1
TO:
VIA EMAIL:
International Criminal Court/The Office Of The
Prosecutor – c/o Mark P. Dillon (Head of Information &
Evidence Unit) - otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
Fadi El Abdallah/Spokesperson Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc-
cpi.int
ICC Public Affairs - PublicAffairs.Unit@icc-cpi.int
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE:
(202) 514-9769 and/or (202) 514-8844
Office Of The Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
c/o Noel Francisco – Noel.Francisco@usdoj.gov
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW #5143
Washington, DC 20530
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (216) 698-2270
Cuyahoga County Office of the Prosecutor
ATTN: Michael C. O’Malley –
mcomalley@prosecutor.cuyahogacounty.us
The Justice Center –9thFloor
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
VIA EMAIL AND/OR FACSIMILE: (202) 514-05632
United States Department of Justice
Office of Legal Counsel
ATTN: William Pelham Barr– US Attorney General
c/o Melissa Golden (*) - usdoj-
officeoflegalcounsel@usdoj.gov
Room 5511, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Permanent Mission of South Africa
to the United Nations
ATTN: Ambassador Jerry Matthews Matjila
Matjila@dirco.gov.za
333 E 38th
Street
New York, NY 10016
U.S. House Of Representatives
ATTN: Nancy Pelosi – Speaker Of The House
c/o Patti Ross – pattie.ross@mail.house.gov3
1236 Longworth H.O.B.
Moorish Science Temple of America:
The Asiatic Nation of North America
c/o Hakim Elamenu-El, ALLI – Executive Ruler
hakimelamenuel@yahoo.com
1050 East 33rd
Street – Suite 206
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
U.S. House Of Representatives
ATTN: Ilhan Omar - Congresswoman
c/o Kelly Misselwitz –
kelly.misselwitz@mail.house.gov
1517 Longworth H.O.B.
FOREIGN NATIONS/LEADERS and the PUBLIC/WORLD-AT-LARGE
1
Boldface, Caps, Small Caps, Italics, and Underline, etc. are used for EMPHASIS!
2
(*) This Fax/Document is for DELIVERY to the person(s) that is addressed at “ATTN” – i.e. THROUGH Inter-Office Mail Services,
etc.
3
PLEASE NOTE: Links/Internet Links provided and the documents/information contained therein as well as the Pictures and the
information contained in them, are herein incorporated by reference as if set forth in full within this instant document. Information contained
herein is based on Personal Knowledge, Research, Investigations, Interviews, Beliefs, etc. and at times have been cut and pasted for usage,
etc.

17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE 2 of 5
RE: REMINDER: PRETRIAL HEARING – MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2019 – 10:00 A.M.
11/01/19 Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and
Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica
International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals…
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
Greetings!
We come to each of you in Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom and Justice! Please find a copy of the
document that we sought to have filed with the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas (Ohio) entitled,
“Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For
Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s
Use Before International Tribunals…” which may be found at the following LINK in regards to the above
referenced matter:
https://issuu.com/vogeldenise/docs/110119_michael_millerel__pretrial_
We have been advised that Michael Anthony Miller-EL’s Mother’s LIFE has been
THREATENED should she seek to have document(s) filed on her son’s behalf! Please be advised that
we want to make it VERY CLEAR that such THREATS on our Mothers’, Elders’, Seniors’, Citizens’, etc.
LIVES, are UNACCEPTABLE and will not be tolerated by our Governments and hopefully not by the
International Communities and Tribunals! Therefore, we believe that this is a matter of URGENCY and
we are bringing it to the attention of the International Criminal Court, United Nations/United Nations
Security Council, United States of America’s Solicitor General, United States Congress and other
Foreign Nations!
We believe that the evidence provided in our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL’s November 1,
2019, Court document (that is being obstructed from being filed in anticipation of the Monday, November
4, 2019, Pretrial Hearing set for 10:00 a.m.) is sufficient to address the Cuyahoga County Court of
Common Pleas’ LACK OF JURISDICTION to address this matter as well as said Court’s, its County’s
and the United States of America’s Despotism Government Officials and their Legal Counsel Baker
Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz’ and CO-Conspirators further engagement in War Crimes and
other Criminal Acts!
We wanted it CLEARLY noted of said Court’s Officials’ engagement in Fraud Upon The Court,
Kidnapping, False Imprisonment, Intimidation, Threats, Telecommunication Harassment, Mail Fraud, and
a series of other felonious acts and War Crimes clearly evidenced and carried out through a Summons
alleged to have been issued on a Strawman (MICHAEL MILLER-EL) in Macon, Georgia through a Carrier
Service (Federal Express) although said Court’s alleged, “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant” clearly
states the following:
Name Miller-El, Michael
Address 1730 Lonna Dr – NW
Roanoke, VA 24019

so, “WHY” is this Court’s alleged Summons (which is NOT reflected for viewing) being issued to a
Defendant in Macon, Georgia and then the “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant” being issued to a
Defendant who has a similar name as our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL in Roanoke, VA?
With that being said, the record evidence clearly supports War Crimes and other Criminal Acts from
the onset of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas’ Officials, Cuyahoga County Officials and their
Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and CO-Conspirators!

17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE 4 of 5
We rightfully and respectfully demand the IMMEDIATE RELEASE of our Brother Michael
Anthony Miller-EL as it has been brought to our attention (via his Son and Daughter) of his being subjected
to Torture Techniques – i.e. as we advised through our previous correspondence as that of October 18,
2019:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101819-letter-uieicc-michael-miller-mattersrevised
https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/investigations/county-jail/sheriff-pinkney-refuses-to-
answer-dozens-of-questions-about-county-jail-during-council-meeting
and other War Crimes, etc. as that presently being Investigated by the International Criminal Court in its
“Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan”
As of 10/24/19: https://www.icc-cpi.int//Pages/item.aspx?name=ma244
matter in which the United States of America has been vehemently contesting in fear of International
Prosecution!
For those who may not know, our Brother was KIDNAPPED from Roanoke, Virginia and
transported over State Lines and/or Territories (via USA Slave Trade Trafficking, etc.) to Cuyahoga
County, Ohio! War Crimes which our records and the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas’ records
support have been reported by him! Furthermore, according to News Reports, said County is presently
under Investigation; however, it is important to note that there are Conflict-Of-Interests present
As of 10/17/19: https://vimeo.com/317716020
which clearly PROHIBITS the United States of America’s Despotism Government Empire from handling!
Thus, most URGENTLY requiring the intervention of the International Community(s) and Tribunals for
the safety and freedom of our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL. Record evidence will support we seek
and have done so in a TIMELY manner - through duly mandatory notifications to the United States of
America’s Despotism Government’s Officials with the duty and obligation to report these actions to the
United Nations and/or International Tribunals; however, have made a conscious decision not to so!
Thank each of you in advance for assisting us in our GOOD-FAITH efforts to bring about a
PEACEFUL Resolution regarding the above referenced matters. We reserve the right to amend this instant
Correspondence should it be deemed necessary! Furthermore, we hope that this correspondence will serve
as further evidence of the “STATE OF EMERGENCY,” etc. that protected National/Foreign Citizens and
Immigrants are being subjected to by the United States of America’s Despotism Government’s War
Crimes… Enforcers, their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their CO-
Conspirators!

Should either of you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (888) 700-5056 and
(601) 885-3324.
Respectfully Submitted,
Utica International Embassy
c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(888) 700-5056 or (601) 885-3324
Email: interimpm@uticainternationalembassy.website
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF AMERICA:
THE ASIATIC NATION OF NORTH AMERICA
c/o Hakim Elamenu-El, ALLI – Executive Ruler hakimelamenuel@yahoo.com
1050 East 33rd
Street – Suite 206
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Phone: (443) 721-8411

of 17 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO1
THE STATE OF OHIO
Plaintiff
MICHAEL MILLER-EL
Strawman Defendant
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Case No. CR-19-641058-A
Judge: REEVE KELSEY
INDICTMENTS:
2921.03 INTIMIDATION
2921.05 RETALIATION
2917.21 TELECOMMUNICATION
HARASSMENT
PRETRIAL AND SUBSEQUENT MATTERS
NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION/
NOTICE TO CEASE and DESIST/
MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE/
MOTION OF ARREST OF JUDGMENT/
Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s
Use Before International Tribunals…
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Michael Anthony Miller-EL (a/k/a Michael Miller-EL and/or Miller-
EL) WITHOUT waiving the lack of Jurisdictional defenses of this Court states the following:
I. NOTICE OF LACK OF JURISDICTION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
1. This Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and
Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of Judgment/Authorization Of Utica
International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals… (hereinafter, “NOLOJ”) is submitted in
Love, Truth, Peace for the purpose of obtaining Miller-EL’s Freedom and to see that Justice take its course!
2. This instant NOLOJ is submitted in good faith and is not submitted for purposes of delay,
harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment, obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious
litigation, increasing the cost of litigation, etc. and is filed to protect and preserve the protected rights of
Miller-EL guaranteed and/or secured under National and/or International Laws governing said matters.
3. This instant NOLOJ has been drafted in compliance with the Ohio Rules of Criminal
Procedure (“ORCRP”) and other applicable Statutes/Laws governing said matters keeping in mind to aid
the fact-finder and in effort of eliminating needless delay, unnecessary expenses and all other impediments
1
Boldface, Caps, Small Caps, Italics, and Underline, etc. are used for EMPHASIS!

to the expeditious administration of justice. For instance, pursuant to Rule 1 of the ORCRP which states in
part and is incorporated herein by reference:
RULE 1. Scope of Rules: Applicability; Construction;
Exceptions
(B) Purpose and construction. These rules are intended to provide
for the just determination of every criminal proceeding. They shall
be construed and applied to secure the fair, impartial, speedy, and
sure administration of justice, simplicity in procedure, and the
elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay.
4. According to this Court’s Docket Entry (as of 10/31/19) in this instant matter, on or about
June 20, 2019, this Court issued a “SUMMONS – CRIMINAL (39005972)” by Federal Express to
“MILLER-EL/MICHAEL/647 HIGHTOWER ROAD MACON, GA 312060000” with knowledge that
service was being made to the wrong address! (Emphasis added)
5. On or about 06/20/19, this Court did knowingly issue a Summons to a wrong address other
than the address provided on its “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant” which provides an address of:

1730 Lonna Dr – NW
Roanoke, VA 24019
6. This Court’s issuance of a Summons (emphasis added) to a frivolous and/or wrong address
was done with willful and malicious intent and other reasons known to this Court to deprive Miller-EL of
due process, equal protection of the Laws, etc. pursuant to National and/or International Laws governing
said matters.
7. Pursuant to Rule 4 (C)(2), of the ORCRP, it states in part:
RULE 4. Warrant or Summons; Arrest
(C) Warrant and summons: form.
(2) Summons. The summons shall be in the same form as the
warrant, except that it shall not command that the defendant be
arrested, but shall order the defendant to appear at a stated time
and place and inform the defendant that he or she may be arrested
if he or she fails to appear at the time and place stated in the
summons. A copy of the complaint shall be attached to the
summons….

However, the record of this Court is void of the “mandatory” documents required pursuant to the
ORCRP to bring allege Defendants (as Miller-EL) before it. Moreover, for the purpose of providing
a “safe haven” for making “it easier for pro se litigants” in pursuit of justice to be aware of the
required forms in the prosecution of matters before the Court. For instance, pro se litigants can refer
to the Appendix provided in the ORCRP as of 10/31/19, that may be found at the Supreme Court of
Ohio’s website at:
http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/criminal/CriminalProcedure.pdf
to determine whether the Court issued the following mandatory documents – i.e. which are absent
in this instant matter – to bring allege Defendants before said Court as:
(a) A Complaint setting forth Formal Charges based on the allege Grand Jury
Indictments by the Prosecutor with supporting Affidavit(s) is absent from the record
in this matter:
(b) The Prosecutor’s “Request for Issuance of Summons Upon Complaint,” etc. is
absent from this Court’s records regarding this instant matter:

(c) The “Summons Upon/Complaint/Indictment” from the Judge, etc. is absent from
this Court’s records regarding this instant matter as provided in the Appendix at
“Form VI Summons upon complaint, indictment, or information.”

(d) The Clerk’s Instructions for Carrier Service via Express Mail (i.e. as Federal
Express, etc.) pursuant to Rule 4 of the ORCRP, Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure
(“ORCP”) and/or the governing statutes/rules is absent from the record of this Court
in this instant matter.
(D) Warrant and summons: execution or service; return.
(3) Manner. . . .
Summons may be served upon a defendant who is an
individual by delivering a copy to the defendant
personally, or by leaving it at the defendant’s usual place of
residence with some person of suitable age and discretion
then residing therein, or, except when the summons is issued
in lieu of executing a warrant by arrest, by mailing it to the
defendant's last known address by… express mail with a
return receipt requested or by commercial carrier service
utilizing any form of delivery requiring a signed receipt.…
When service of summons is made by a commercial
carrier service, it shall be served in the manner
prescribed by Civ. R. 4.1(A)(1)(b). . . .
RULE 4.1 Process: Methods of Service
(A) Service by clerk.
(1) Methods of service.
(b) Service by commercial carrier service.
Unless the serving party furnishes written
instructions to the clerk that service be made
pursuant to Civ.R. 4.1(A)(1)(a), the clerk may
make service of any process by a commercial
carrier service utilizing any form of delivery
requiring a signed receipt. The clerk shall
deliver a copy of the process and complaint or
other document to be served to a commercial
carrier service for delivery at the address set
forth in the caption or at the address set forth
in written instructions furnished to the clerk,
with instructions to the carrier to return a
signed receipt showing to whom delivered,
date of delivery, and address where delivered.

(e) Pursuant to Rule 4 of the ORCRP, the “Receipt of Summons by Serving Authority”
– i.e. Federal Express – alleged to have been used by the Clerk of this Court is
absent from the record of this Court.
(f) Pursuant to Rule 4 of the ORCRP, the mandatory “Return of Service of Summons”
is absent from the record of this Court.
(D) Warrant and summons: execution or service; return.
(4) Return. The officer executing a warrant shall make return of the warrant
to the issuing court before whom the defendant is brought pursuant to Crim.R.
5. At the request of the prosecuting attorney, any unexecuted warrant shall be
returned to the issuing court and canceled by a judge of that court.

When the copy of the summons has been served by delivering a copy
to the defendant personally or by leaving it at the defendant’s usual place of
residence with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing
therein, the person serving summons shall endorse that fact on the
summons and return it to the clerk, who shall make the appropriate entry
on the appearance docket. When the copy of the summons has been served
by mailing it to the defendant’s last known address by… by a commercial
carrier service utilizing any form of delivery requiring a signed receipt, it
shall be docketed and returned in the manner prescribed by Civ.R.
4.1(A)(2).
RULE 4.1 Process: Methods of Service
(A) Service by clerk.
(2) Docket entries; Return. The clerk shall
forthwith enter on the appearance docket
the fact of delivery to… to a specified
commercial carrier service for delivery, and
make a similar entry when the return receipt
is received. If the return shows failure of
delivery, the clerk shall forthwith notify
the… the party at whose instance process
was issued and enter the fact and method of
notification on the appearance docket. The
clerk shall file the return receipt or returned
envelope in the records of the action.
When the person attempting to serve summons by delivering a copy
to the defendant personally or by leaving it at the defendant’s usual place of
residence with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing
therein is unable to serve a copy of the summons within twenty-eight days of
the date of issuance, the person serving summons shall endorse that fact and
the reasons for the failure of service on the summons and return the summons
and copies to the clerk, who shall make the appropriate entry on the
appearance docket. If the return of service of a copy of the summons
attempted to be served by… a commercial carrier service utilizing any
form of delivery requiring a signed receipt shows failure of delivery, the
clerk shall file the return receipt or returned envelope in the records of
the case.

At the request of the prosecuting attorney, made while the
complaint is pending, …or a summons returned unserved, …may be
delivered by the court to an authorized officer for execution or service.
(g) Rule 4(C)(2) of the ORCP is clear that when a Summons is issued (as alleged in this
matter), an arrest is prohibited and/or unwarranted; moreover, when this Court
received notification of failed service, the Clerk of the Court was to notify
Defendant (allege to be Miller-EL) and enter into the record of this Court of so
doing; however, said information is absent from the record of this Court regarding
this instant matter.
(C) Warrant and summons: form.
(2) Summons. The summons shall be in the same
form as the warrant, except that it shall not
command that the defendant be arrested, but shall
order the defendant to appear at a stated time and
place and inform the defendant that he or she may be
arrested if he or she fails to appear at the time and
place stated in the summons. A copy of the
complaint shall be attached to the summons…
8. On or about June 20, 2019 (according to Docket Entry), this Court issued a Summons.
9. Pursuant to Rule 9 of the ORCP, the Process Server will have 28 days to serve the Summons
and Complaint. Likewise, upon receipt of service, the Defendant may have 28 days to respond.
RULE 9. Warrant or Summons Upon Indictment...
(C) Execution or service; return.
(2) Return. The officer executing a warrant shall make return
thereof to the court.

When the person serving summons is unable to serve a
copy of the summons within twenty-eight days of the date of
issuance, he shall endorse that fact and the reasons therefor on the
summons and return the summons, and copies to the clerk, who
shall make the appropriate entry on the appearance docket.
10. On or about June 20, 2019, from the Docket Entry of this Court, an Arraignment Hearing
was set for July 5, 2019 – i.e. approximately 15 days after issuance – to an Out-Of-State Defendant alleged
(according to address provided on the “Issue Warrant for Named Defendant.”
11. On or about June 20, 2019, from the Docket Entry of this Court, an “ORP – Warrant On
Indictment Issued.”
12. On or about June 21, 2019, from the Docket Entry of this Court, “CAPIAS SENT TO
SHERIFF.” While it is not clear to Miller-EL what the Capias is for – i.e. there is nothing in the record
of this Court to support filings and service notifying of any allege lawful and/or legal action by this Court
against him.
13. On or about July 3, 2019, approximately 15 days from the issuance of the Summons on an
Out-Of-State alleged Defendant and according to the Docket Entry of this Court, a “LETTER OF
APPREHENSION SENT TO ROANOKE POLICE DEPT IN ROANOKE, VA” – i.e. not the Macon,
Georgia Police Department but Roanoke. Therefore, a reasonable mind may conclude that this Court and
its Clerk’s Office having knowledge from the June 21, 2019, Docket Entry filing its “Issue Warrant for
Named Defendant” that said act was done with willful, malicious, fraudulent and criminal intent, etc. to
cause injury harm to the alleged Defendant (Miller-EL)!
14. On or about July 9, 2019, approximately 19 days from issuance of Summons, there is a
Docket Entry alleging, “FX RECEIPT NO. 39005972 RETURNED 6/26/2019 FAILURE OF SERVICE
ON PARTY MILLER-EL/MICHAEL/ - BAD ADDRESS AFTER 8 DAYS - ” alleging a return date of about
June 26, 2019; however, no such entry is made and neither is there an entry in the Docket of this Court to
support that the Clerk of this Court made good-faith efforts to notify the alleged Defendant in this matter
as mandatorily required to put party(s) on notice of any such Court/County action being taken! It is not
clear to Miller-EL the significance of the “after 8 days” in that according to Rule 9 of the ORCRP regarding
“Warrant or Summons Upon Indictment…,” the Process Server and/or Service of Process affords 28 days
to perfect Service – i.e. which was not! Therefore, this Court lacks Jurisdiction which has not been waived!
Instead this Court elected to send a “Letter of Apprehension” to the Roanoke Police Department and
deprive allege Defendant in this matter due process, equal protection of the laws, etc. in accordance with
National and/or International Laws governing said matters!
15. On or about July 23, 2019, there is a Docket Entry for, “SENT DETAINER TO ROANOKE
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE IN ROANOKE, VA.” Thus, further supporting that this Court and its Clerk
of the Court having knowledge in the issuance of the 06/20/19 Summons only (i.e. without mention of
Complaint) to a false address in Macon, Georgia was for purposes of committing fraud upon this Court
and for purposes of furthering War Crimes and other Criminal acts that are being carried out against
Michael Anthony Miller-EL in retaliation to his reporting of Criminal Acts to of Officials of this Court and
County, etc. As a matter of law, Miller-EL is entitled to evidence (as said Detainer issued on the Roanoke
County Sheriff’s Office in Roanoke, VA) for his records!

16. The importance and/or critical nature for the mandatory recordings of when Summons is
served on Defendant is to allow the Clerk of Court to set a date (i.e. for instance 28 days from the
Defendant’s receipt of service). However, it is obvious from the War Crimes and Criminal Acts being
carried out that the United Stated of America’s (“USA”) Legal Counsel (Baker Donelson Bearman
Caldwell & Berkowitz) and other Members of the Confederate States of America, Ku Klux Klan, White
Supremacist Groups and the Zionists want to make a Slave and example of Michael Anthony Miller-EL for
exposing their War Crimes and Criminal Acts!
17. The record evidence and “LABELLING” Miller-EL is in keeping with the compromising of
the United States of America’s Constitution, “BLACK Code” Laws, etc. which the USA has been operating
under for quite some time in its Officials/Representatives/Lawyers’ quest to strip members of protected
groups of their freedoms, nationality, sovereignty, and independence, etc.
18. The USA Officials/Representative/Lawyers’ fear of the truth getting out due to the fact that
said truth would adversely impact the USA’s Economics and Commerce, etc. – i.e. especially the Slavery
Empire that they have been masking through such MASS Incarcerations for frivolous Crimes as that to
which Michael Anthony Miller-EL is being subjected to.
II. MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE
WITHOUT waiving the lack of Jurisdictional defenses of this Court, Michael Anthony Miller-EL
(through this Motion for Production of Evidence) pursuant to Rule 12 of the ORCRP further demand that
the State of Ohio and this Court provide him with “ALL” documents noted to have been filed and issued
according to the Docket Entries in this instant matter – i.e. to include those that do not have icon to view
documents online and/or download. Said Rule which states in part:
RULE 12. Pleadings and Motions Before Trial: Defenses and
Objections
(C) Pretrial motions. Prior to trial, any party may raise by motion
any defense, objection, evidentiary issue, or request that is capable
of determination without the trial of the general issue. The following
must be raised before trial:
(1) Defenses and objections based on defects in the
institution of the prosecution;
(2) Defenses and objections based on defects in the
indictment, information, or complaint (other than failure to
show jurisdiction in the court or to charge an offense, which
objections shall be noticed by the court at any time during
the pendency of the proceeding);

(3) Motions to suppress evidence, including but not limited
to statements and identification testimony, on the ground
that it was illegally obtained. Such motions shall be filed in
the trial court only.
(5) Requests for severance of charges or defendants under
Crim. R. 14.
and further state:
19. The evidence requested to be produce is that capable of determination without a trial in that
is allege evidence according to Docket Entry.
20. His objections to this Court abuse of power, lack of jurisdiction to proceed in this matter,
and the War Crimes and other Criminal Acts being carried out against him!
21. Objection to the absence of evidence in the Docket of this Court to support that perfecting
of Service of Process in this matter.
22. Objection to fraud being committed upon this Court by the Judges, Clerks, Sheriff,
Prosecutor and Court/County Officials, etc.
23. All documents and/or evidence alleged to support the indictments made against alleged
Defendant in this action. Evidence – a reasonable mind may conclude – that should have been provided
with any such allege Complaint filed to support this matter.
24. Jurisdictional defenses set forth in this instant matter as well as the objections set forth in
same that is alleged to have instituted this frivolous prosecution.
25. Defenses and objections are based on defects in the alleged indictment(s), information, or
complaint which cannot be substantiated.
26. This instant Motion is timely, properly and adequately submitted to suppress “ALL” alleged
evidence, including but not limited to statements and identification testimony, on the ground that this action
is illegally and/or unlawful and has been instituted for purposes of committing fraud upon the Court, to
cause undue duress, pain, suffering, hardship, oppression, enslavement, torture, mental injury/harm, and
other reasons known to the State of Ohio Officials, County Officials and Court Officials, etc.
27. Through this instant Motion Miller-EL is demanding and/or requesting pursuant to Rule 14
of the ORCRP, the severance of “ALL” allege charges and/or claims against the allege Defendant in this
matter.
28. Pursuant to Rule 12 (E)(2) of the ORCRP, in the interest of affording justice to take its
course, demand and/or request the documents and/or evidence alleged to support the indictments against
the alleged Defendant as well as evidence used to support the alleged Complaint (i.e. which does not appear
in the Docket of this Court); however, is falsely alleged to exist according to Docket Entries!

29. Due to indigent status, that this Court immediately provide Miller-EL with the Transcript
from the October 25, 2019, Arraignment Hearing.
30. During the October 25, 2019, Arraignment Hearing, this Court pursuant to Rule 5 of the
ORCP, failed to advise Miller-EL that he “need make no statement.” Thus, infringing upon the protected
rights of Miller-EL which further subject him to War Crimes and other Criminal Acts.
31. According to October 25, 2019, Docket Entry, this Court notes in part, “Reading of
Indictment waived. Twenty-Four Hour Service Waived. Defendant PLEAD Not Guilty to Indictment.” A
reasonable mind may conclude that such an assertion is one alleged against Miller-EL having been placed
in life-threatening conditions, subjected to torture, abuse, intimidation, mental/physical abuse, coercion,
etc. and are practices prohibited under National and/or International Laws! Furthermore, pursuant to Rule
5 of the ORCP, this Court failed to advise Miller-EL that during an “Initial Appearance” and/or
“Arraignment Hearing” obtained through fraud and other criminal acts, that he is not required to enter a
plea!
RULE 5. Initial Appearance, Preliminary Hearing
(3) That the defendant need make no statement and any statement made may be
used against the defendant;. . .
In felony cases the defendant shall not be called upon to plead either at the initial
appearance or at a preliminary hearing.
32. That this instant matter and the frivolous indictment alleged be dismissed for the reasons set
forth in this instant NOLOJ
33. This Motion has been timely brought.
34. This instant Motion is submitted in good faith and is not submitted for purposes of delay,
Unlawful/Illegal practices in furtherance of the War Crimes and Criminal Act being carried out against
Miller-EL!
III. MOTION OF ARREST OF JUDGMENT
WITHOUT waiving the lack of Jurisdictional defenses of this Court, Michael Anthony Miller-EL
(through this Motion for Production of Evidence) pursuant to Rule 34 of the ORCRP further demand and/or
request that this Court arrest Judgment. In support thereof, further state:

RULE 34. Arrest of Judgment
The court on motion of the defendant shall arrest judgment if the indictment,
information, or complaint does not charge an offense or if the court was
without jurisdiction of the offense charged.
When the judgment is arrested, the defendant shall be discharged, and his
position with respect to the prosecution is as if the indictment, information,
or complaint had not been returned or filed.
35. The alleged Indictments, information and/or Complaint do not charge offense(s) and neither
does this Court have Jurisdiction to proceed on alleged indictments/offenses charged!
36. Michael Anthony Miller-EL demand and/or request that the Judgment be arrested and this
instant matter be discharged with prejudice.
37. In the interest of the due course of Justice, relief is sought for the arrest of Judgment in that
the alleged Indictment(s), information, and/or Complaint is frivolous and should have never been filed –
i.e. as evidenced through the War Crimes and other Criminal Acts evidenced in the record of this Court
regarding this instant matter.
IV. NOTICE TO CEASE and DESIST
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: For the above foregoing reasons set forth as well as reasons
known the Plaintiff, notice is hereby issued of and against the State of Ohio, its County Officials, Court
Officials and their Representatives, Legal Counsel, etc. to CEASE and DESIST from the unlawful acts,
War Crimes and Criminal Acts leveled against Michael Anthony Miller-EL (a/k/a Michael Miller-EL)! In
further support of this instant Cease and Desist do state that he:
38. Authorizes the use of this instant NOLOJ for use in Legal/Lawful matters before
International Tribunals…
39. Reiterates his objections to being Kidnapped, Falsely Imprisoned, Enslaved, Tortured,
Threatened, Coerced, Degraded, Humiliated, subjected to Cruelty/Inhumane Treatment, etc. in retaliation
to his being a Witness to the War Crimes and Criminal Acts being carried out in the Cuyahoga County,
Ohio – i.e. in the Judicial Process and Detention/Prison System, etc. – as set forth in his Affidavit(s)
submitted to this Court for filing. Said acts which are violations to his protected and secured Rights under
National and International Laws!
ROME STATUTE:
Section 1.01 Article 55 - Rights of Persons During An Investigation
1. In respect of an investigation under this Statute, a person:

a. Shall not be compelled to incriminate himself or herself or to confess
guilt;
b. Shall not be subjected to any form of coercion, duress or threat, to
torture or to any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
or punishment;
c. Shall, if questioned in a language other than a language the person fully
understands and speaks, have, free of any cost, the assistance of a
competent interpreter and such translations as are necessary to meet the
requirements of fairness; and
d. Shall not be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention, and shall not
be deprived of his or her liberty except on such grounds and in
accordance with such procedures as are established in this Statute.
40. Hereby incorporates consecutively the following documents :
(a) Judicial Notice and Proclamation
(b) Writ of Prohibition
(c) Common Law Writ Of Habeas Corpus
(d) Additional Article
(e) Writ Quo Warranto:/Affidavit of Truth/Public Notice
(f) Jurat Ackknowledgment
(g) Treaty of Peace & Friendship 1787 Between Morocco and The
United States
(h) Conclusion of Dejure Law & Facts
(i) War Against the Constitution/People of Congress
(j) Facts

(k) Jurisdiction Challenge
(l) Relief Sought
(m) Affidavit of Fact and Surrender of the Alleged
Defendant/Legal Person/Legal Entity, Michael Anthony Miller
(n) Certificate of Service
(o) Egypt, Capital Empire of the Dominion of Africa – Affidavit of
Truth
(p) Public Notice
[INSERTION OF THE
ABOVE REFERENCED
DOCUMENTS FOLLOW]

Michael Miller-El
Michael Miller-El,
Cuyahoga County Court Of Common Pleas

Michael Miller El
Michael Miller-EL
Michael Miller-EL
MICHAEL MILLER )
Michael Miller-EL

Michael Miller-El
Cuyahoga County City Jail #CR-19-641058-A #CR-01-414098-ZA #CR-94-305226-ZA
#CR-92-284038-B #CR-87-221522-A
Michael Miller-El

Michael Miller-El
State of Ohio Republic (dba) judges clerks et al

Michael Miller-El CR-19-641058-A

Michael Miller-El
Michael Miller-El

Michael Miller-El
CR-19-641058-A
“MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER”
Michael Anthony Miller
MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
Michael Anthony Miller-
“MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER”
MILLER A MICHAEL MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
MICHAEL MILLER
MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER

Miller-EL reserves the right to amend this Pretrial and Subsequent Matters Notice Of Lack Of
Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion Of Arrest Of
Judgment/Authorization Of Utica International Embassy’s Use Before International Tribunals… should he
and/or this Court believes it is necessary in that it is being provided in in Love, Truth, Peace for the purpose
of obtaining his Freedom and to see that Justice take its course.
This instant NOLOJ is submitted in good faith and is not submitted for purposes of delay,
Respectfully submitted this 1st
day of November, 2019.
_________________________________
Michael Anthony Miller-EL
Special Filing – Pro Se
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that in accordance with the Rule(s) governing said procedure(s) and
matter, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice Of Lack Of Jurisdiction/Notice To Cease and
Desist/Motion For Production of Evidence/Motion To Arrest Judgment/Authorization Of Use Before
International Tribunals… has been produced and has been mailed via First-Class Postage Paid or Hand
Delivered to:
Cuyahoga County Office of the Prosecutor
ATTN: Michael C. O’Malley
ATTN: Jonathan McDonald
The Justice Center –9thFloor
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
Respectfully submitted this 1st
day of November, 2019.
_________________________________
Michael Anthony Miller-EL
Special Filing - Pro Se

11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL)

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

La actualidad más candente (20)

Similar a 11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL)

Similar a 11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL) (20)

Último

Último (20)

11/02/19 REMINDER OF 110419 PRETRIAL HEARING REMINDER (Michael Miller EL)